Understanding the weirdness of humans 

It would had to have a beige print and cover (maybe embossed letters so one can see them).

Beige pages with beige cover, the text is comic sans in dark red ink.

that would be the name of the book "nothing in particular" by Loyd

and he should call it 50 shades of Beige

I'd buy it.

"Bald patchs are the peacock feathers of maturity and intelligence." - Bald Guy

His brain is so big it's pushed the hair out!

Is the mouthful of broken teeth he has a _"jaw ventilation system?"_

@@itsmonsta8614 Its because his height is higher than his hair ceiling

it's his convertible

Ill need a few beers to get my head around that!

That's a classical thing to say tho

From wikiquote There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them. - Possibly a paraphrase of Bertrand Russell in My Philosophical Development (1959): "This is one of those views which are so absurd that only very learned men could possibly adopt them." It is similar in meaning to Orwell's line from Notes on Nationalism (1945): "One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe things like that: no ordinary man could be such a fool." However, Russell was commenting not on politics, as Orwell was, but on some philosophers and their ideas about language.

Back when I was trying to convince my friends to buy Bitcoin when it had lulled at 300-350 for a year or so I realized I'm so smart in comparison to them that they think I'm stupid.

It's even funnier because he's a career intellectual.

Wouldn't that require shrinking down?

You can be whatever you want Omi, my little squirrel

@@morningstar9233 if furries want the right to be animals, we have the right to hunt them.

Hunt the little squirrels, Jeremy.@@jeremy1392

Nut allergies can be cruel kid, tough luck.

So we can rehearse grief ofc

stuart cole We have baguettes

George Pêcheur and you know what you can do with them. 😉

@@Robert_Emu_Leemake it a jambon beurre and you're on to something!

Diabolical indeed. The poor child will be force fed vile things like snails and frogs legs. :(

Yeah, I know a guy who got a C and had to get glasses.

I scored a 20/20 on the final exam

@Ei Dirst wheee :D 3rd dimension is for sissies

@@kasper7203 me after getting called out: :( You sitting there smug: .)

Pat fenis

Cuck Master Flex Well.

@@cuckmasterflex9106 you tell em

Luckily, we all have quite a degree of control over our width.

Unfortunately my width is determined by my love of cheesecake.

Paul Paulson width of what? Is this a dingus joke? Like the front naughty?

@@Rokaize he's probably talking about his waist.

thicc

@Marry Christmas As a non brit i always think Newcastle upon Tyne is the default Newcastle.

@@carlosandleon Absolutely! Newcastle upon Tyne is the only genuine one. All of the others are just pale imitations.

Not only integrity; but a basis of reality that is based objective realities.

@@JoeyVol What do you believe the problem is hmmm?

America needs a heavy dose

Vero nihil verius.

@@argonhammer9352 he just stated what he believes the problem to be. you might require an IQ of some description to be able to read between his lines though. if i say i need water, i am also saying that my problem is a lack of water.

technically males and females ARE different,because nobody is really the same

@Ei Dirst actually women are way more emotional and dramatic

@@zejdland that has to do more with your environment as a child. I think what happens is that women are generally "protected" more as children. If your son is being bullied, you tell him to sucker punch the kid. Your daughter is being bullied? you talk to the principle.

You have added punctuation where it was never used or required. "The idea that men and women are the same upstairs is so stupid that only an intellectual could believe it!" - Wonderful stuff! :-)

@@MrTrollinglol lmao what country were you braught up in where you tell your kids to hit other kids, yall need help

Spoken as a true Brit.

A minute's silence?

Fell off my chair!

Imagine the baby sent to Somalia....?!? Dreadful....

Why do people hate France so much? I mean, I guess I can think of why the British might, you know - because history. But they copped a pretty bad reputation as being "soft" when Napolean was basically the pre-WW2 Hitler and France the Pre-British "world power". I think the Americans think because France's allies fucked them in the leadup and start of WW2 and then the USA swept in right at the very end after the Nazi's were already terminally fucked (I don't doubt the US reduced the time until they were defeated, but it was inevitable by the time they jumped in) - that somehow that makes the US so much tougher than the French (who actually survived through the epicenter of BOTH world wars)

Maybe you're at the cutting edge of feeding ducks by the pond

@@morningstar9233 EXTREME duck feeding. Now with three types of bread. Oh, yeah!

Don't worry. Age brings wisdom, and wise men speak the most amazing words of truth.

@@nobodyimportant5417 now you need to upload a video of you feeding ducks while Infant Annihilator plays in the background, and have a frame of fire on the video. That will be some extreme duck feeding.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yhuMLpdnOjY.html

Romanian here

He can do it for 2 hours, believe it or not. Check out the Gladiators video

Most RU-vidrs start when they're very young, so of course their early content will be cringe worthy and looked down on later in life. Loyd here had the advantage of having recorded that both when he was somewhat older and when recording such things wasn't as easy as pressing a few buttons.

Yet he doesn't accept the wrong thing he has stated in many old videos, he made a video in 2009 outright denying man made climate change,yet has not either made one or a comment retracting that statement, I agree it's good to acknowledge your past videos no matter how wrong or cringey they are, but to talk of how much we should accept science like he did in this video, surely he should address the things he himself got wrong in the past, rather than just plugging his own videos that were (or might be ) right.

Hey, don't forget his machine gun video too! ...we should leave some things to professionals...

Aye, but we should also let people like Lloyd take a good crack at it anyway, I'd be far less knowledgeable on a lot of subjects if it wasn't for lindy (machine guns included) but with comments and further research you can get a good amount of knowledge on subjects you'd never have even thought of. But people like Lloyd should take responsibility, or at least acknowledge when they're misinformed or just straight up wrong alongside bringing new videos. I don't think anyone one would love his videos less if he admitted mistakes

His climate change video is utterly embarrassing , even though I respect him very much, it tarnishes his other videos especially since he apparently values "truth" and "facts" above all, yet he fell victim to corporate propaganda.

babysealsareyummy and that's already better than never noticing at all you're off topic!

I know, right? He just kept talking in one long incredibly unbroken sentence moving from topic to topic so that no one had a chance to interrupt it was really quite hypnotic...

babysealsareyummy: my mother can pick up a topic (ad libitum) where we left off because of an interruption a year earlier.

He may use cue cards...

Louis Stubbolo: a few lines will serve. I once made a speech at an international engineering conference from a single cue card with four key points on it. It received an ovation. :) :)

People are so desperate to get away from the tyranny of the EU that they take the most terrifying risks in their desperation to escape. One refugee tried to swim from Norway to Scotland in January! Needless to say, he didn't make it. Many others make the hazardous crossing from France, and some pay for it with their lives. Yet nitwits wonder why we left the EU! We had a very narrow escape. Other people are escaping all the time, especially from France. What idiot would send a child there, perhaps to be literally terrified out of its life?

Social scientists look at the evidence. They just see it as a tool of patriarchal oppression.

@@gorkyd7912 Mostly because they prefer to look at the past and the trees, not the forest and the truth.

Agriculture started in the stone age, you know. He didn't specify which stone age, he might well have meant the neolithic.

And fast alcohol metabolism. Screw your typhus we got beer.

I am well known for my superior loughing.

marshaul supirior*

@@kapjoteh Silly me!

Hi , you need some stem cells , and an ap called crisper , ivdont know why squirrel , there was a 600 lb 9 foot tall ,gaint 3 toed sloth , aim high ! Keep going!

You should self identify as a squirrel. ;)

@@useodyseeorbitchute9450 And then turn out to be a very very "lousy" squirrel" ;)

Nuclear Power Plants?

German neighbors

How dare you, sir. France is the nation of romance! Just ask any barn animal...

No.

The bitter knowledge of knowing that without british toughened glass bottle technology (for cider) there would be no champagne?, British merchants were producing "sparkling Champagne before the French were?

He is, after all, the bear.

That was bugging me for a while haha. "Is that the fecking bear!?"

Some women might state it because albeit wrong, it helps to fight the "history of ideas" issues. And some men might agree, either for the same reason or because they hope to get laid. But what kind of progress do you make if you have to put ideology over truth?

.... and the quote that will earn Lloyd a place in the hall of fame of "alt-right" sexist (probably voted for Brexit) demagogues standing in the way of true progress towards equity. Or some such. Too many people stating the obvious get branded these days, while I found this episode widely entertaining and insightful. Go evolutionary psychology!

He's right, but calling someone stupid for having a wrong belief isn't exactly profound.

@@dmitchel0820 Given that we are talking about science here in this video: He says the NOTION is stupid. He was challenging an argument/idea. You interpreted is as an ad hominem attack. Which it wasn't. I say the point goes to Lindybeige in this one instant :)

'so stupid only an intellectual could believe it' is a very old quote, originating from George Orwell. Lloyd is not the first to say it, so I'm afraid it's not the 'funniest, most profound quote of 2018'.

But he was born in a beige shirt and a sweater, right?

@@MWSin1 Humm yes, seems very possible from my calculations

Nope, nurture made him bald. Probably worn too many helmets

Trisha Dwyer you should go to a Malaysian math class you’d find it hysterical!!!! ;-)

That concept actually shows up a lot in HFY forums, where the age old "Humans have no instincts" line is put in direct opposition with aliens who very much disagree. "I have to strap a computer targeting system to my face and rely on mechanical augmentation to do the impossibly complex math involved in throwing this ball at that target. Human, how are you just casually scoring a hit without any augments at all!?"

@@animorph17 The human would reply with something only they can do without augmentation. Like seeing in the darkness. Also while we can throw stuff we are still terrible at it.

@@animorph17 Funny you mention the ball analogy as it's used often to explain why stereotype accuracy is one of the most replicated findings in psychology. Your brain is a pattern recognition machine that can distil information you don't even notice into emotions and reactions that you can't begin to explain without post-hoc rationalisations. If someone threw a ball to you with the intent for you to catch it catch it, chances are you could probably do it unless you were otherwise impaired. If someone told you to work out every single variable involved in the arc of the ball, speed of the throw and where you need to place your hands you would find it impossible. For better or worse your brain is built for shortcuts.

​@@thefirstprimariscatosicari6870 Terrible implies a standard. As an objective baseline, you have arms and hands so you're immediately more adept at throwing a ball than 99% of all known living creatures and your direct competition is other humans, machines humans built, or theoretical perfections that exist only in the minds of humans.

Digressception

I read this in the voices of Monty python. Brought a bit of joy to my day. Thanks :)

Pedantic, I know, but "paleo", "neo" and "lithic" all derive from Greek, not Latin.

@@jameson44k I was afraid of that.

@@BaronVonQuiply Still a nice quip there mate. I almost had a thought like that but instead just went on listening to the ramblings. If you ever do that gag again you'll know to change the last word to Greek, which I think might even make it funnier...

jameson44k HEY! Who taught you Greek?!?

ive got a question. what if the friends just keep falling off the cliff and there is nothing you can do about it? shall you just keep feeling all the inconvenience? i think at some point enough is enough and shutting the inconvenience down is better, as at some point the inconvenience will shut you down instead. ?!

Be careful now, displaying an open mind will get you expelled.

I searched long and hard for a comment like this one just so I could like it. This could only have been destiny.

Thank you for adding this comment as you have saved me from having to do it myself!

If so then there would be more courses than all the tea bags in the world.

I have never understood how people can view things as so clean cut, black and white when in reality almost nothing is.

@@Hedgehog1039 it seems like it's easier to categorise and evaluate ideas quickly and "get shit done" if you see things in black and white. Oh look, there's s grizzly bear in your backyard. You happen to be holding a shotgun. Maybe the bear is just looking for some berries to eat before leaving. Maybe he's going to feel threatened by you and attack. I'd argue that people that think more in black-and-white -- ("I'm in danger") -- and shoot the hypothetical, unsuspecting bear immediately would be statistically more likely to survive and pass on their black/white thinking genes.

@@JohnDoe-ne4kg Hmm, I am not entirely convinved of that. Just because you don't expect it to attack doesn't mean you wouldn't be prepared to shoot it dead like the other type of person. I'd argue that having a wider range of ideas and opportunities at your disposal due to your way of thinking would result in higher success. Perhaps they can get things done quicker but I would think it will be to a - generally - lower standard. Hell, maybe that's the reason I can't find a single tradesman who can fix / fit or make something right. They just "get it done". If I do have people in doing things (when I don't have time to do it) I usually have to fix it afterwards or re-do it anwyway so I avoid it at all costs. "Prepare for all scenarios but never be too quick to determine which one it may be" Everything is unpredictable, even what you may encounter going to the supermarket. Regardless of that. It just seems crazy that when some things are so obviously not black and white people still manage to view it in that manner (which is completely confusing to me). It is as if they need a definite clean cut answer to back up, as if anything more is too much thought or effort or not stable enough for them to pitch on.

Ahh, the Beigepill. It's not quite a Red, but it is far from a Blue. Tread carefully fellow pillpoppers, you wouldn't want to over dose on Blackpills… lest you be left with no other choice than the dreaded Ironpill!

lololol! Beigepilled needs to be a thing

The eternal Anglo pill

It's definitely a thing now

With a huge pencil in the background

Got any immediate questions that need a quick answer? I've done some research, I understand it quite well, and I love talking about it.

Patreon has started cancelling people's accounts to stop them discussing this. PayPal forced them to do it. Asserting we are all interchangeable justifies setting quotas as opposed to merely promoting equal opportunity. Because of the situation in Scandinavia with people choosing roles according to interest not income, minority activists are aggressively pushing against this and insisting on quotas to 'solve' the 'problem' . To talk about it is financial suicide if you rely on PayPal which services Patreon. Recently PayPal closed down a business called Subscribestar because people started going through Subscribestar to avoid using Patreon after a You Tuber decided he'd had enough. It's a mess, and we are NOT ALLOWED to discuss such things.

No the thing to take away is that 99% of them DON'T when they have that choice. Therefore it makes no sense to point at differences and call them a problem.

@@piotr78 it's really not at all 99%, lol.

@@pseudonamed It's actually the highest in Scandinavian countries. Look it up

@@piotr78 "highest" doesn't mean "99%", lol.

for example, about 25% of engineers in Sweden are women, not 1%. So why should we stop 1/4 of engineers from doing what they love just because they are women?

I wished you'd told me that before!

your point

Actually, you do. It could be a scam. Or you could look for fresh seared palm. But you can act immediately as if the stove were hot.

What you described is witnessing PHYSICAL pain, and deducing what caused it and how to avoid it, thus saving yourself from potential injury. Lindybeige however talked about EMOTIONAL pain, which at first glance seems to serve no real purpose.

Do you have a Phd in stating the fuckin' obvious.....?!

That's a very silly pun, but I loved it, it made me laugh out loud, thank you for that.

hmmm.. you should probably take Poes Law into account when communicating with text containing exaggerated syntax.

@@Ghryst nope, this is the comments section of RU-vid, feel free to project your world view on others words.

Yeah, very nice. I wonder where he got it from.

@@Direkin The same place that issued the gun, I assume.

Thank you for this comment. I thought it looked like a Judge shield but I wasn't 100%, and no one was going to see my comment asking about it after 5 days have past. PS- There is going to be a TV series possibly starring the man with the best scowl in Hollywood himself: Karl Urban. He's said that if they can write a compelling script with characterization he can get behind, he's on board. Highly anticipated for me.

Exercise to failure is to muscular strength... It's a good point. Antifragility is the concept. Systems which become stronger in response to stressors are very strong evolutionarily.

Those who study military training regimes have referred to combat training with its loud noises and simulated peril as a form of behavioural innoculation against the possible confusion and paralysis induced by fear. Get your fear over with in training: you'll still experience it in real combat but will know how to function despite it. This, at least, is the theory!

I think that framework also explains the popularity of watching fail videos and other kinds of slapstick entertainment. Observing and remembering ways you could hurt yourself is rewarded.

Count me in

this is not conclusive, as in the stoneage humans had no cattle to milk yet many europeans have genes allowing for milk consumption in the adult age, therefore acutly evolution ocurred after the stone age. also evolution can't stop it literaly can't

Speaking of evolutionary sociology! Look up Jordan Peterson! He is cool!

@@patriciusvunkempen102 If we are no longer subject to environmental pressures we do. Now all we need to do is decide what counts as an environmental pressure...

@@gnarlestongnu637 Sure, but other people count as environmental pressures.

@@grahamstewart2968 Society in general would be an environmental pressure but not other people directly, otherwise the same could apply to other animals. It's fairly irrelevant in terms of evolutionary pressure compared to everything that came before, human nature etc.

That’s determinism, not evolution.

@@jsbrads1 : no, it's just downright weird.

Just imagine what I do to shower trays

Yeah I just noticed that too...

but you dont need to know how they lived in the paleolithic period beyond the basics. What sort of predators were relevant, what sort of dwellings did they have, what sort of food did they eat etc. What happened in any given period is less important than the evolutionary pressures over very very long stretches of time

@@matthewantonello5029 Actually, yes you do. A modern person's conjectures about what pressures were felt by paleolithic people could easily be wildly wrong, and likely are, because we don't know nearly enough about their cultures or behaviors. As an example, for centuries we have believed that prehistoric man lived in a "barter" economy. because that was how 18th, 19th and 20th century behaviorists thought people would have lived, whereas, now, we think that he (and she) lived in what is described as a "gift" economy which was much more (dare I say...dare. dare) communistic. The false assumption (assuming that modern thought on the matter does not switch back) led to huge misapprehensions about what sorts of evolutionary pressures those people felt. Evolutionary Psych is a very, very loose field that is approximately as fertile ground for imported biases as eugenics was.

Bigger problem is the 'built for the stoneage' hypothesis, that pretends humans haven't had significant genetic change over the last few tens of or even few thousand years, which is ironically an appeal to the loathed tabula rasa - that is, once humans evolved the capacity for cultural evolution, there was no longer any need for genetic evolution. But actually, the two reinforce each other; genes shaping culture shaping genes, even more rapidly than in a state of nature. So we know that e.g. the spread of agriculture correlates with the spread of the genes of the people who first started doing it. So it wasn't that the idea of agriculture spread out from, say, the middle east to europe, but that the people doing agriculture in those regions slowly migrated everywhere else, which suggests that the people they were supplanting didn't have the genes to do whatever it is you need to function as a settled, agricultural society. Which was probably something less obvious than not understanding how to take care of crops. It might've been something more in the area of how to keep such large numbers of people working together peacefully towards one goal over long periods. This spread of agriculture also correlates with the appearance of more spiritual artifacts, so it might be the agriculturalists were more religious than the people they replaced; this increased religiosity serving as a powerful glue to keep these groups unified and workings towards the same goal over generations. Or maybe it was something else. Evolutionary explanations for strange behaviours are rarely the first ones you can think of, and we often incorrectly attribute effects to causes that have nothing to do with each other (but sound compelling) and vice versa.

@@MrCattlehunter Right now I think the adaptive pressure on humans is diminishing. We can fix the results of an increasing number of genetic flaws (e.g. bad sight, bad mobility etc.) and those are not selection traits any more, so the genetic pool of the human specie is accumulating more diversity, at the expense of the average adeptness to the natural environment without the help of a complex society. It's the opposite of a bottle neck, and it's the effect of technological advancement. So one can say we stopped evolving, since evolution (selection, differentiation) is what happens during bottleneck phases, when the diversity generated during the easier times is screened and selected according to the parameters of the changing environment. The problem with this is that we are increasingly dependent on a complex society to live, and few of us would be able to even survive if this enormous globally interconnected system (->e.g. the parts needed for assembling a car come from all corners of the world) failed abruptly for any reason. If - say - an unpredictable period of strong solar instability were to wipe all satellites from the sky, and cook all complex electronics from one day to the next, we'd be pretty much all fucked, except for people who still live in very underdeveloped regions. A nuclear war could have the same "tabula rasa" effect, and I fear we wouldn't have good chances of rebuilding, for a lack of "Stone Age - rated" individuals. In the end, while the advancement of technology provides a solution to our most basic needs, it also opens up a whole new world of possibilities for even greater dangers. Cavemen who lived in small communities didn't have to fear criminality; as soon as we lived in cities, this once non existent threat emerged. Bushmen who lived in tents and huts didn't really care about seismic activity, but as soon as stone masonry and architecture were part of our society and culture, earthquakes became an issue. Every step forward alleviates some of the hardship of life but comes at the price of some increase in dependence on society, and risk, in one form or another.

A lot of evopsych's assumptions can be confirmed by studying modern-day apes and humans. And the important bit is, those studies are factual. Facts don't change with re-interpretation.

Welcome my fellow, I hope you’ll enjoy your stay

Hello to you! 👋

i thought it was great. not only because of the joke. it also makes the whole great courses plus thing less theoretical seeing some footage from it

"They will look for his coming from the White Tower. but he will not return." *weeps*

But what if it do? Luminerty confirmed

Yes, but as opposed to Lindy, the criticism of the use of these ideas is absolutely valid when it comes to you given your fascistoid videos.

VERY INDO-EUROPEAN

@@Qsdd0 "Reeee fascist!" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-OZAGF2KdwUo.html

Helder Monteiro What that euphemism stands for definetly is. Also given your own propensity to be dominated by strongmen, you shouldn't be calling anyone cucks.

Before any alt-righters straw man this to oblivion: I don't have a problem with the interest in paganism, EvoPsy, genetics and what have you. The problem is the adoration for Evola, and the obvious association with clear fascist youtubers like The Golden One, yet being obtuse about your own affiliation with fascism in your videos.

I'm glad Joe Biden won and shut up the MAGA crowd. What an irritating group of people they are! Dear oh dear!

True. Wind the evolutionary clock all the way back and we were all the same (maybe not technically, but essentially). It was literally the appearance of a couple of weirdos that led to the diversity of life we see now. ;)

Weird is only that of which is out of the norm. Weird is subjective, normal is subjective, it’s all bonkers.

Admiral. i perfer to ask "What is normal?"

kudosbudo normal is me, for im a dog in her majestys navy

^

en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/myriad A countless or extremely great number of people or things.

@@ajnasreddin But it is still Ancient Greek word for 10.000

@@TheMrjohannes1995 it sounded like he was speaking English to me. At no time in the video did i have to say, "That's Greek to me."

@@ajnasreddin it is like Allah Snakbar meens that u are gay here in Denmark. But in Allah land it means "God is Great"

They still exist today but popularity has waned.

“Oh, you just got married?”

@@calebfail2116 wat

How did a Shadiversity comment end up under this video????

@@shkvorrel9660 cuz this is RU-vid after all lol

It’s from his T shirt promo. “Oh, you just got married? BUT WHAT ABOUT DRAGONS?!?”

...and didn't even provide sources for verification en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-equality_paradox#Possible_causes_and_criticism

I think that happened a long time ago. Did you not see the climate change denial video?

@@TheRevWillNotBeTelevised i did. I would love to see someone knowledgeable seriously address Lloyds very sensible points. But mostly i didn't want to mention it in case it would encourage the almost inevitable dogpiling. I hope that Lloyds channel is something like the youtube equivalent of 'the Shire', where slightly parochial, but inquisitive and civilised folk can lead a good and pleasant life while the more embittered armies of ideological conflict don't deign to look. This will of course last only so long, until the the general conflagration intrudes. At which point i fully expect Lloyd to arise as an indignantly affronted hobbit of great stature, to smite the armies of darkness in his own genteel way, before returning to his chosen lindyhop and antiquarianism. Despite the distaste he might feel for such crude conflict, I am quite sure he will not duck

koopification I do not agree with all of his points, but he is often insightful. Anyways, I don’t think he had a patron or even that many subscribers when he made the climate change video.

@@AURORA08A Our great indignant furry footed fellow will find and return the ring of ideological circular thinking and echo chamber indoctrination into the magma chamber of the intellectual Mount Doom, and fail to chuck it in at the last moment, only to have it snatched by the Gollum of goofiness who thereupon fumble footedly flounces, in a thoroughly unintentional Lindyhop imitation, over the inexplicable "stone lip" and down into the roiling molten rock, thus freeing all those suffering from enslavement by the current intellectual Sauronians (!?) so as to thenceforth enjoy, without irony or bad breath, the aforesaid goofiness of the likes of Lingybeige, thus making the world a better place on which to flounce around in that unintentional Lindyhop sort of way that comes naturally when we are pleased by simple wonder as our furry footed fellow, and apparent savior, is.

@@AURORA08A Haha that was one of the most well worded and satisfying RU-vid comments I've read in a while, and I completely agree. His channel is a nice, quiet escape from the political rubbish that seems to be everywhere on RU-vid nowadays.

@Bill Whittaker If you recognised most of them, where would you recommend me to start? Absolute beginner in the subject. Thanks!

As mankind eventually burns everything they've ever thought of, they're all barbeque sources . . .

@@loddude5706 That's what the Internet is for: all knowledge for all people for all time. You'd have to burn the entire world to the ground to get rid of it. But since that's now possible, we really should get going on that offsite backup on the Moon. ;)

Is somebody going to use this for a paper in school? I think maybe.

@@brodieknight772 Haha, no. Just a curious (and lazy) guy hoping to learn something.

Yes, I caught that massive contradiction too. Also, how are they any more or less pointless than any other form of entertainment?