22:16 - Paxman's hesitation in ruling the answer incorrect is due to the fact that the movie is a remake/version of Johnson's answer under a different name.
He's overly hasty, argues, and gets it wrong twice on the same question, while - granted - being entertaining in the process. A portent of things to come?
First key thing to be noted - by the world - left and right are represented on each team. A wondrous-looking thing in and of itself, by the standards of 2024.
Extraordinary how some people's loathing of the good Mr Paxman makes them use just any old nastiness to describe his reactions. To describe his reaction at 9:57 as a sneer is not just wrong, it's simply st*p*d. Such corruption of the language is one of the worst manifestations of Wokery.
@@castelodeossos3947 I do not loathe Jeremy Paxman. He is as far as I know a perfectly decent and honourable man, but it cannot be overlooked that he is pompous and self-regarding, which possibly explains your affinity for him.
Sadly the CONcervative membership voted wrongly back in August but it would so good of Klaus Schwab to help the parliamentary party get the right answer second time round
@@BlueBlazer47 I guess so, but change has happened so rapidly in the lifetimes of old people alive today that anyone who didn't change their mind for a few decades might be considered arch conservative too
@@Rootle2: No one's being cruel to conservatives. If the right wing ideal is to make poor people poorer, or to be allowed to use abusive language to mock the disabled, to use two instances, they're making their own lives harder as well as others'.
