Updated 'Guess Who?' Game Now Has All 437 Genders 

If you ask do they have rainbow hair you'd eliminate 98 percent so that's my go to start question.

🌮 or 🍆? It`s that easy

​@@censorshipsucks9493 Oh oh oh!!! Septum piercings!!!

WTF is wrong with you?

"Where is the exit?"

I like that.

...and incomprehensible rules around real estate transactions nobody understands or needs...

But the Get Out of Jail Free card can stay!

The sequel to Ms. Monopoly.

@@kylemacdougall8355 Actually, the Get Out of Jail Free card will replace all the community chest and 50% of the "chance" cards, but doesn't apply to the top hat, the purse, the horse, or anybody with white privilege.

lol Wish I had thought of that. Batteries are a patriarchal heterogenic fallacy based on male and female terminals.

Well you generally need batteries for a vibrator...

Sockets and plugs 🔌 are actually labeled as Male and Female. Plug male into female to make the electrical current flow. If you try some other combination it won’t work.

I identify as a AA battery.

Since when were there batteries in guess who?

😂

I bet you they kept re recording because more genders showed up 😂

Teach exponential growth with number of genders: "5 years ago there were only 2 genders. Today there are 57. How many genders will there be in 20 years?"

@@artstocker60 It sounds like commercial back in the day that asked the question "how many licks does it take to get to the center tootsie pop?" The world may never know.

Only a 100? How hateful, exclusive, and all the made-up -ist and -phobe can you be, huh?

👌😂 xx & xy?

Bro doesn’t understand the difference between gender and sexuality 😂

​@@SteamStorm445 Que? Because there is none. They are two different words that mean the same thing.

@@Mines00 They do NOT mean the same thing. Please educate yourself from actual sources and not youtube videos.

​@@julbiot9768sex biology Gender is words describing someone sex gender

And you sometimes get mugged if you try to go detroit

100th like lol

Sloppy Joe has got to go.

Valefisk got you covered

I want an inflationary monopoly no joke

Masterpiece of a comment right here.

That explains why Ukraine is losing. They're still fighting with HORSES!!

🎖️

You mean one mangy horse you argued about for half a year

You should see the new version of monopoly. Every time you land on "Luxury Tax" all your money goes to the railroads and utilities, the cost of all properties on the board doubles, and when passing Go you collect 5% less. Free Parking also has meters now.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Perfect!!!

Oh they definitely missed an opportunity. Like, isn't that misgendering or improper use of pronouns or something?

Guess who is not inclusive anymore.

Best comment!!

Did they give you a "I'd rather not say" option? Because that's invasive and could be considered sexual harassment.

Need to generate statistics🙄

@@graciegj63 Yes they did, but given how audacious the choices were, I was afraid "rather not say" would make them think I was into zoophelia or something. I just said I was straight.

@@tarfap.kpamber9732 Because every job needs at least one two-spirited gay pansexual to be inclusive I suppose... And yes, two-spirited was a gender option. So was nonbinary, and I think the difference between to the two may be whether or not you hear voices in your head.

@@nathanc6516 Two spirited sounds like they're describing demonic possession

Except those with natural immunity

It prefers to be called the death of colour

And particularly relevant in 2024.

Eastern Europe does not escape corruption

Not for long buddy 😂

- 10% for Brandon.😁

Funny I would be a zillionaire

@@danmadison5087 You go big guy.

@@vampiregoat69 Yeah, with funny money in the loony bin.

A million billion...no that can't be right...a zillion billion gajillion

Capitalism

Gender of the week club. If you join you will get the next 52 genders for a discounted price, but only if you get them all.

But that would support the capitalist uber suppressors and cannot be tolerated, or something like that.

Hahahahha capitalism

@@TOMiX1024yeah but capitalism infects everything

Oh so you're NOT going to play our super inclusive game?! What are you, a BIGOT?!

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-aN-dbvA7WYE.html

fax lmao

Bingo!

“ermm, actually, that is offensive since every gender has to participate”

Dude I know, the world is legitly going crazy.

the world is being destroyed by our pollution, people are dying daily from the inability to buy food due to inflation, and your biggest problem with modern society is gender identity i dont supports 400+ genders, but you really need to get your priorities straight.

Seriously. The amount of people who joke about the lgbtq+ community like this and often treat them like they have mental illnesses is really sad. Oh you were one of those people, nevermind, sorry.

Same. That hit me about midway into it too lol

​@@vintasaruThe delusion is just salt to the wound

YOU LEFT OUT THE "I" AND THE "A," YOU NON-INCLUSIVE MONSTER!!!!! 😮

@@kylemacdougall8355 OMG! Send me to the gulag immediately. Haha. :)

add a plus when the line is ..FOREVER

​@@kylemacdougall8355 an LGBTQueue I aint standing anywhere near

@@kylemacdougall8355 DON'T YOU DARE FORGET D FOR DAUGHTER-SEXUAL, A FOR AUTISTIGENDER, Z FOR ZELDAGENDER, AND MOST IMPORTANT, S FOR SATANSEXUAL, YOU HATEFUL RACIST SEXIST HOMOPHOBIC FASCIST RELIGIOUS CHRIST BELIEVING WHITE HETERONORMATIVE BIGOT!!!

And now WALMART!

Wait, do furries and femboy count as gender too now?

@@MP-vc4nuif furries are now considered a gender i’m lighting myself on fire.

​@@MP-vc4nuNo

@@MP-vc4nuno they don’t deserve a spot

I think they had some good stuff a bit more recent than 20 years, tbh, they really lost their minds when Trump became a candidate. It was all political after that point, with just a few breaks more recently.

@@briana6181 no...20 years sounds accurate. Obama years showed us that. Hence the need for Babylon Bee

Such a true statement, and it makes me sad. I can hear Phil Hartman doing the voiceover in my head.

They are so woke, it's sickening. The glory days of SNL are long gone.

Nah, this feels more MadTV

The fine print was what got me rolling.

Target went woke & missed its mark.

But isn't Target reversing on the gay stuff? lol

Yes. But that doesn't narrow it down

😂😂😂

W-w-w-what?

It's definitely not marcel wallace.

Wait a second... Did you just assume the gender by saying "he"? That's racist!

Also the game extends itself. Every 5 turns you have to flip up most of your down pieces because those characters have transitioned into something else.

@@kentonkruger8333 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-aN-dbvA7WYE.html

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-aN-dbvA7WYE.html

@@kentonkruger8333😂 damn

​@@kentonkruger8333 In addition. Every 10 turns, a new expansion gets released with 25 new genders every time.

Well said.

Endocrinologists disagree with you. you’re just showing your ignorance and hurting people.

​@Lapusso650 lol you speak for them all? What an ignorant thing to say

It is so hard to respect people as decent human beings

​@@mxpofficial3443 indeed it is

no way bro they scammed us

The remaining pieces self-identify as invisible and non-corporeal

Some of them have two genders.

Several of the pieces identify as multiple genders at once, therefore fewer than 437 pieces are required to cover them all.

Now *THAT* is a good one! Thumbs up!

You'd only need to make eight extra guesses, as a yes/no question's response provides one bit of information, the standard two-gender game requires one bit to state the gender (since 2^0

@@Anonymous-df8it they have already probably coded “long unsigned int gender” so there’s nothing to worry about

@@ragtowne 32-1=31 extra questions?

@@ragtowne 2^32~4,000,000,000 or about half the world's population. So 2G male, 2G female, 4G others.

oh I get it because they’re all dirty fuckin’ liars hahaha how original 😂 Truly, is there no other joke about LGBTQ? Have they found the end of comedy?

THIS.

​@@SomethingSomethingSynth try asking yourself why the "one joke" that seems to upset you so much continues to be relevant satire. "You don't get it, I really am snufflegendered! How dare you, it's not made up! No, neither are the 3000 other gender identities listed on wikipedia! You're just a bigot if you say otherwise!"

That is just wrong on so many levels I don't know where to begin. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A " REAL GENDER " ALL GENDERS ARE MADE UP BY THE STEREOTYPES WE PLACE ON PEOPLE. THERE ARE TWO SEXES AS SEX AND GENDER ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THING. FOR THE LOVE OF WHATEVER CULT LEADER YOU FOLLOW SHUT UP AND LET PEOPLE BE PEOPLE 💖🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈💖 HAPPY PRIDE BTW

@@milliegirl2005 YAAAAAAAY! 💝🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈💝

OG MrBeast reference?

If the answer to the mythical creature is "no", you can immediately take out 435 possibilities. Good move.

@@ChibiNyan Technically, that's a bad idea as a binary search is probably better as the expected value of information (entropy) is higher. Also, Guess Who? has (had?) an actual problem; the completely antiscientific 'male as default' for humans, which is like stating that water flows uphill Before I clarify the expected value of information, let log(b,x) be log base b of x. Also, let's work out the amount of information in bits of finding out a trait: If the trait occurs in half the sample, knowing whether or not it's present gives one bit of information by definition. If you found out that a sample member had two independent traits with (not necessarily) different probabilities, the probability of having both traits is the product of the probabilities for each trait. Since we want the amount of information to be additive, not multiplicative, it's going to involve some base of logarithm for the probability of the trait. Therefore, the amount of information in bits of finding out a trait is -log(2,[probability of trait]). Finally, the expected value of something is defined by taking the probability of getting a certain value multiplied by the value itself, repeating this for all possible values, then adding them up. In other words, the expected value is the sum of the values weighted by the likelihood of each value occurring. In the case of information, given two possibilities 'yes' and 'no' with probabilities p and 1-p respectively, the expected value of information is p*[amount of information gained if 'yes']+(1-p)*[amount of information gained if 'no'], or p*(-log(2,p))+(1-p)(-log(2,1-p)). Therefore, in your example, if you had a binary search, then the expected value would be (1/2)(-log(2,1/2))+(1/2)(-log(2,1/2)), (1/2)+(1/2), or 1 bit of information. If you ask a question that takes out either 2 or 435 possibilities, the expected value would be (2/437)(-log(2,2/437))+(435/437)(-log(2,435/437)) or (approximately) a whopping 0.042155 bits, which shows that it's a *_terrible, terrible_* move. Also, Guess Who? did run into a problem, though it wasn't the lack of non-binary genders; the problem was one would expect that 'is it [sex]?' would form a binary search (i.e., either sex would show up in 12 cards out of 24), but it didn't as femaleness (as opposed to maleness) was treated as a 'characteristic' and thus only showed up in 5 cards out of 24, which is completely antiscientific (not to mention sexist) as humans are mammals, not birds, and this is how mammalian sex determination works: Female mammals have XX chromosomes and male ones have XY chromosomes. When mammals procreate, one of the female's X chromosomes unite with the male's X or Y chromosome with equal probability, giving rise to (approximately) equal proportions of male and female offspring. The X chromosome, like the autosomes, are essential for life, whereas the Y chromosome simply signals to produce testes that release androgens, triggering masculine development, as opposed to feminine development, which is the default mammalian pathway. In birds, this is reversed, as I alluded to in the previous paragraph. If you absolutely must treat a human sex as the default (which you shouldn't), it has to be femaleness

@@Anonymous-df8it what's log ?

​@@ChibiNyan logarithm

​@@ChibiNyan log(b,x) is defined such that b^log(b,x)=x. Now, let's define b^k. For positive integer values of k, b^k is defined as b*b*b*b... k times, or more formally: b^1=b, and b^(k+1)=b*(b^k). Here, I'll outline how it is typically defined for arbitrary real k Before we start, let's make it clear that b^(m-n)=b^m/b^n. This is because the right-hand side looks like b*b*b*b... (m times)/(b*b*b*b... (n times), that is, n copies of b in the denominator cancel with m copies of b in the numerator, leaving (m-n) copies of b in the numerator. Similarly, b^(m+n)=(b*b*b*b... m+n times)=(b*b*b*b... m times)*(b*b*b*b... n times)=(b^m)(b^n). Also, let's make it clear that, b^(mn)=(b^m)^n. This is because the left-hand side looks like: b*b*b*b*b...* b*b*b*b*b...* b*b*b*b*b...* ... where each row has m b's and each column has n b's. We can add parentheses as shown: (b*b*b*b*b...)* (b*b*b*b*b...)* (b*b*b*b*b...)* ... =(b^m)*(b^m)*(b^m)... n times, or (b^m)^n, the right-hand side. Now, we can use these two identities to define b^k for all rational k. Let k be equal to m/n, where m and n are integers and n is positive. We want to define b^(m/n) such that the above properties still hold, allowing us to conclude that (b^(m/n))^n=b^(mn/n)=b^m. If m is positive, we can define b^(m/n) such that when you multiply it by itself n times, you get the same result as multiplying b by itself m times. If m is zero, and since we want the above properties to still hold, we can define b^0 as b^(1-1) or (b^1)/(b^1)=1. Also, as a bonus, if m=0, m/n also equals zero, so we're done here. If m is negative, and again, since we want the above properties to still hold, we can define b^m as b^(0-(-m)), or (b^0)/(b^(-m))+1/(b^(-m)). In other words, we can define b^(m/n) such that when you multiply it by itself n times, you get the same result as multiplying b by itself -m times, then taking the reciprocal. Now, assuming that we want b^k to be continuous, we can define b^k for all real k. Let k be equal to the limit of k_1, k_2, k_3... where k_n for all n are rational. b^k can then be the limit of b^(k_1), b^(k_2), b^(k_3)... If we set k such that b^k=x, then k would be log(b,x). Now finally, to see how logarithms turn multiplication into addition, consider that b^(log(b,x)+log(b,y))=(b^(log(b,x)))(b^(log(b,y)))=xy. Taking the base b logarithm of both sides gives the following: log(b,x)+log(b,y)=log(b,xy)

*Fortnite*

They say there are 2 sexes and a bajillion genders

In some countries you just contact the ones who run your personal records as a citizen and tell them you want your gender label changed. I mean why do anything complicated when you can become a woman through just a telephone call?

​@@jex-the-notebook-guy1002 correct because sex and gender are completely different from each other. Sex is purely about what part of the reproductive sistom you have wals gender is about the stereotypes we have placed on top of them and whether or not you identifi with them

@@milliegirl2005 why are you here?

@@jex-the-notebook-guy1002 to try to edacat you brain dead idiots in to realising just how hopelessly wrong you are

Not fully related, but it's Pierre.

You don’t use 50 dollar terms or words, and if I asked you to name the capital of Albania you wouldn’t have a clue, so don’t go ragging on people.

But they'd know who shot the pooch

And how to pronounce it correctly.

It's so demeaning to put a dollar amount on someone's gender identity, you patriarchal Nazi. And it's Des Moines.

😂🤣

You wanna get together and talk pretzels, Highness?

@chambergoosepaste9164 I like the big soft kind with salt and cheese.

Nice. Mine is hot, gooey canned cheese.

@@jonhall3151 I would love to dip my big, soft pretzel in your cheese. Yummy.

Find a new doctor and tell him or her why

Be careful, there are 437 different kinds of nurse assistants.

Assume someone's gender by looking at them: offensive Look at a man wearing makeup, earrings and a dress, assume he's a man playing dress up: "LOOK at me! Do I LOOK like a MAN?" You can't win.

"Did you just assume my gender?" "No, I inferred your sex, and if I got it wrong it's because you deliberately made it difficult to determine through normal observation--a practice that has been important for the continuation of the species throughout human existence."

If I go into a shop or other service provider and am asked my gender, I leave. Simple as that. No need for cumbersome conversation, no money for the dipstick, everyone wins!

As a liberal, I find conservative humor concerningly unfunny. There one joke is "duhh woke 100 gender drag queen"

@@AtariTheAnimator The real funny thing is calling this stuff "conservative". This should just be surreal, but it's not.

No, an Apache helicopter. Im offended and i'll proceed to complain on twitter.

They were going to have an expansion pack with 10 different models of attack helicopter, but they had to ship them all to the Ukraine instead.

Are we back in 2015? Find a funnier meme next time. That's just uninspired lmao

​@@carimeslockdownedtree2654attack helicopter

@@purple6705 wow I'm so offended ;p nah man this is a matter of unfunny memes. Sometimes, you just have to let old memes go.

@@carimeslockdownedtree2654 "Sometimes, you hav-" 🏠🚁

How do you know which one is straight?

Funny... but the vast majority of straight white males in today's world and history are anything but privileged. That's just another racist lie.

a straight white man

This sounds like the exponential number of board states you can have in chess

You're missing the obvious answer - the people currently in charge of the company made superficial changes to pander to as many people as possible (according to their focus group) without actually understanding the game or its lore.

A fellow gameoligist i see

Haven't you heard Math is "racist" The more you know.

a) The male to female ratio is 19:5, as they had the completely antiscientific 'male as default' assumption for humans, which is like stating that water flows uphill. and b) You'd only need to make eight extra guesses in the modified game a) Femaleness (as opposed to maleness) was treated as a 'characteristic' and thus only showed up in 5 cards out of 24, which is completely antiscientific (not to mention sexist) as humans are mammals, not birds, and this is how mammalian sex determination works: Female mammals have XX chromosomes and male ones have XY chromosomes. When mammals procreate, one of the female's X chromosomes unite with the male's X or Y chromosome with equal probability, giving rise to (approximately) equal proportions of male and female offspring. The X chromosome, like the autosomes, are essential for life, whereas the Y chromosome simply signals to produce testes that release androgens, triggering masculine development, as opposed to feminine development, which is the default mammalian pathway. In birds, this is reversed, as I alluded to in the previous paragraph. If you absolutely must treat a human sex as the default (which you shouldn't), it has to be femaleness b) A yes/no question's response provides one bit of information, the standard two-gender game requires one bit to state the gender (since 2^0

Just identify as a poc even if your white

EQUITY!

@@GuiltyGaming Equity would rather be that the dice only has 1 value on all sides, leading to everyone getting the same result.

@@linusgustafsson2629 Yeah, you and I both know those sides are “color-coded.”

A better comparison would be that ON AVERAGE white people would start on say space 40 while POC start at the begininng. Their are no chutes, and there are only ladders sprinkled in spaces 0-40. That's racial equity in a nutshell these days. Someone else's opportunities are not harming your success. Though I agree a better way to do it would probably be more income-based or disability-based and less race-based.

The point isn't to irritate; it's to point out the truth.

​@@treason520 Yes, and nothing irritates them more than when someone tells them a fact they don't want to hear.

What if you make your pronouns you/your and confuse everybody?

@@EdKolis When they speak to you, of course the you/your pronouns apply.

​@@yunidai16and the confusion starts when they don't

Yes sir you would

Fair

And an octodecillion imaginary dollars... lol

Probably a good thing that you did. You know how tolerant and accepting those kind are when it comes to people who refuse to play along with their delusions. You avoided getting violently assaulted.

Yeah if we put these guys in regular guess who they would get out like half the people with the gender question and then be fucked

Not to worry - there is no more cabbage anyway.

@@shaventalz3092 No more cabbage?? How dare you slander the Party! Off to the gulag you go!

There is no potato either. Such is life.

@@EdKolis I commented about how a complaint regarding the lack of cabbage would be slander against the Party. YT deleted it!

Indeed! The more ridiculous it gets, the more real fun is to be had :)

It’s satira. Obviously you could.

Is your character on the left side or right side of the board. Is your character in the top half or the bottom half of the board or something that's how I played it lol. My friends and I stopped playing because it became a game of who gets to ask first.

You seem fun

You really must get out more.

Most of them self identify as a file

Soon to be an RF D I chip.

I'm the baby! Gotta love me!

I'm going to repeat your comment to see if its deleted. Hope you don't mind! A game which requires rules to satirize a social contagion that exerts control over people by constantly and deliberately changing the rules. Great satire 👏 Plus the desperate-to-play-the-game parents being berated by their children is perfect

Liberals and Oppression Olympics. Name a more iconic duo

@@Pidatha Liberals and Conservatives. Name a more iconic duo. (The joke is that they're functionally the same thing, people wasting their lives arguing about meaningless culture war bullshit)

No actually we have you too. So two jokes

@@yurisei6732Fr. This geñder crap is a bunch of baloney but taking a political side honestly makes you the bigger 🤡

​@@yurisei6732 Trump and Biden. Name a more iconic duo

either way every single comment assumes it’s right wing

Ok buddy, go and buy the Guess Who set from this video and then we’ll talk.

Good satire never gets old. As long as people in the woke crowd like you insist on there being "at least 3" genders (your POTUS's words) the rest of us will continue to make fun of it. I'm a liberal, btw: its pretty ironic how you see politics as binary, but not gender.

...and counting.

colors has always been that way, everything, other than the 3 primary colors, has like a thousand different names

​@@user-nx3by5gy1ntrue but these days if you say the word black it's offense or brown or coloured. So wouldn't surprise me if they'll be a pc version.

@@SoulFaeWorldliterally no one thinks that’s true

@@Paradoxical8945 there was a time people thought that about genders . The thumbs up and society says different. People do think that

@@SoulFaeWorld Who is “the thumbs up”? And why do they say different?

They’re liberals then.

@@BaconFaceMcGeeWhat about people with health conditions who need to wear masks.

@@Cupcake_Royale Then they should wear them.

Pedo in chief or is that Pedo in daughter?

legit 😭 they’ve been using the same joke for like 15 years. ITS SO BORING!!!!