Urbanization and the future of cities - Vance Kite 

Simply DGD mhm

Yessir

yes im doing mine today

yep ;-;

here xD

Me, too.😏

same here m8

+Synochra same...

+Synochra we ARE stdying

1503nemanja just not what we should

Yep

yep me to

Me to, greetings from Germany

yess

YUP

yep- It was a Geography lesson ._.

Hi Keir I was brought here as well lol

@@Jorell8 *i didnt expect anybody i knew to find this*

I'm the teacher 😂😁

Plot twist: I'm actually the teacher lol

Thank you!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you I needed this!

thank you so much!!!

Vishita THX NOW I DONT HAVE TO WATCH THAT VID

Lets go

Blame inefficiency, dude. That's what's responsible for much of the suffering in the world.

Feynstein 100 your 4 years late.. and I guess im 2 yrs late too :b

More people than we need more like

It’s also overpopulation

@@shayseahawkraptorfanTrue 😢

Thx , u deserve more likes

As someone from an urban area of some of the world's poorest countries, I can attest, my city (which was named once here) is expanding f*cking rapidly. The prices of flats have gone up 1.5 times in the last two years in my neighborhood, inflation accounted.

ily so much

@@kakalimukherjee3297 inflations hitting worse now but i hope youre doing fine.

ty

Hahaha

🤣🤣🤣

Lol

we dont lmao, 10 billion is fine

WHY- ARE YOU RUNNING?!

8 years ago you were learning this know i am for exams how's life you've probably got a job too

lmao

NewZero hope this statement doesn’t remain constant

Exactly!!!!

well these year werent great

Myrissa Neufeld and change it to “urbanisation”

Have you seen the movie inception?

I Subed to u

Exactly!!!!

Are you having a stroke

Whitby Waves calm down, breath in and out.

+g0lanu Can you provide examples?

+eluxsus0195684 well, take a simple stuff from the conclusion part of the video, it's so generic that it's most likely true. it's like reading one's horoscop. if they don't provide specifics, they're just stating platitudes. but it's not necessarily the way things will move forward. i.e. this idea that we'll grow foods in pots in our homes is laughable when you think of the total needs of a family during a year and the lack of spacing in current multi-story building (even in developed countries). of all the probable solutions, they pick 2 and one of them doesn't even start to address the issue. and it also doesn't cover other controversial topics, for example, humans are already producing enough food to feed 10 billion people, but a lot of it is wasted... and there's the history of urbanisation which I think I covered well with my initial comment, it wasn't a linear progression at all. it's also not a good segue way into the conclusion of the video, it's not even a logical argument for the necessity of these changes (it's actually irrelevant, we have different issues today from 300 years ago or more). it makes little sense considering the ending.

g0lanu I see your point, but this video is really just a broad summary of a possible outcome. It's four minutes long, not an hour long documentary. Details aside, I don't find the probability impossible, but there would need to be a drastic decrease in population and usage of resources.

+eluxsus0195684 See?! now this is what got me worried about the video: rash conclusions. If you only have 4 minutes at your disposal than why waste them with parts that don't connect with each other? Also, by not making a strong case for the issues, how do you even know your conclusions are true?? (and they aren't)... It also gives room for dangerous assumptions, such as "the population would need to decrease to ..." - which are also not true, that is some fear mongering coined 200years ago that was never factually true, nor did it meet the burden of proof or the test of time. The population kept increasing and we kept finding new ways to deal with the situation. Whatever the problem is, a population decrease would either imply a calamity of catastrophic proportions or genocid - so this can't be it's solution. Any reasonable solution needs to consider an ever increase of the population (that will cap out at some point if we do manage to increase income per capita, education and health) and the solution to those actual problems that such a trend implies.... and they're all in our grasp, if we're honest.

Empires come and fall. Only libtards assume everything will be perfect by creating state dictatorships.

RIP

f

F

F

F

We need do somethink for earth faaast we need to speak about what happen now in this world! We need to do somethink speak with presidents!

CoRoNA

Bruh don't swear

@@haydenharding-hubbard8083 fu

no YOU help me 😰😟

Yes, we might have a utopian city in the future!🚝

@@bennymora3086with all the wealth we have exploited we better do, especially for our future generations!

City states like Singapore aren't self-sustaining genius, Singapore is the executive of a company and require a huge network underneath it to flow in capital or physical goods like food! London flourishes because the capital of the rest of the UK flows disproportionately into London, same goes for Shanghai, Tokyo, Seoul, Berlin etc etc. You think every rural village can become a city state? Every farmer as affluent as urban bankers? Capitalism is by definition a pyramid, if everybody becomes a city state then competition would drive them all tribal, with no one actually producing the basic raw goods that people at the top take for granted!

city states will make the raw goods and much better than villages. On say a modern farm, the main job of a farmer is to fix machinery and have a good understanding of plants. Now lets say we have a guy with a Bachelors degree a lab and a drone which goes out and gets samples. That is a far better way of knowing what to do than going out with the 4 wheeler and taking notes on what plants look like in different parts of the field. So know we have a man who can care for the well being of 1000x as many acres of plants as before and he must choose where to live. He will want to live in the city were he can buy what he needs and go to movies and do all the other things people do in cities and all this comes at the small cost of a bit more energy in a tiny drone. Technology is allowing people to live were they want(usually the city) more and more with every innovation.(no matter how they help the economy, banker or farmer or steel worker)

kkknotcool Do you... know how food is harvested and transported across the world? 1 - Certain foods require certain climates. People today take food from all across the globe as granted, ignoring the huge amount of logistics and manpower required to get that one flipping mango or coffee to in front of your face in fresh condition. 2 - If your solution is to "use technology" as the deus ex machina of everything, then greenhouses still require raw material and energy to construct and maintain environments not of the local climate! Creating something that isn't there doesn't come for free! 3 - Do you think entire hectares of farmland will be picked clean by a tiny drone? Do you know how many flipping people are on the planet and how fast we're reproducing? You're underestimating stuff *a bit* aren't you? Lastly, your lovely technology is funded by and depends on, hello, capitalism! In an utopian world we'd all adopt the newest tech and spread it around the globe, but patents and conglomerate monopoly, as seen in the pharmaceutical industry, don't work on our altruistic ideals do they? Buddy tech doesn't solve everything, and in certain cases, leads to even more control, as opposed to freedom.

Da ve To your first statement. Yes, different foods are grown in different climates but I can never eat a pineapple again and be fine for the rest of my life in turns of diet. Most people can grow everything they need in the climate they live in. To your second statement. yes things cost money and no, not every problem is solved by technology. If somewhere the food was not plentiful enough to make it economically then people would just move to where food is or that city would buy food from another city to keep the valuable population. To your third statement, NO I do not think the flying drones will harvest crops, but people don't harvest staple crops like corn anymore ether. The combines do almost all the work with human supervising.(A farmers job is mostly mechanic nowadays, believe me I live in the country) You should really make a million dollars then complain about capitalism. Almost every American can make a million dollars if they want and you will learn a lot about how markets work if you try.

kkknotcool You know, we still live in the age of scarcity, a.k.a. stuff don't randomly generate out of nothing ad infinitum. that goes for physical goods like food and raw material, and that goes for economic concepts like money. By the laws of socioeconomics if everybody's a millionaire, NOBODY IS, inflation? So as one accumulates disproportionate amount of wealth, others will invariably suffer for it. If it's post-scarcity then it's another matter entirely, but have you invented molecular reorganisers yet? In the pursuit of wealth, education is key, yet if all schools are prestigious, no one is! In the accumulation of wealth, if you're paid a millionaire's salary, can all your workers get the same? Again, bit naive about socioeconomics? Reagan and Thatcher's laissez-faire attitudes are as old as civilisation itself, and they have been debunked plenty of times. So why does it persist? *Because you are a lottery-buyer, so claims everybody have equal chances, but there will invariably be just a few winners, and if all receive equal shares of the jackpot, then there are no winners are there?* Perhaps you should study economics 101 before you condescendingly ask others to do the same...

Yeah, and forgetting about their behavior that forgetiing trees

@@bonvg6037 What is the meaning

Hehe doing geography HW wight

@@ayanfaisal2404 Already done

Papyrusans Online school brought me here

School also brought me here and i did not learn a damn thing

im in geography rn

Dexter Gestern come on don't be rude )':

Dexter Gestern However .. thank you this is your opinion

thats the one that the jews conquered

Nerd

CoRoNa

No even with the economy collapse, another dark age is now impossible. Although a extinction level event could do it.

+Workdove An economic collapse of the dollar will force corporations to create digital currency to maintain jobs and civil unrest. It could work splendidly, but then we'd all be slaves to their whims (as if we already aren't) working in a borderline feudal system with the likes of McDonalds ruling over urban fiefdoms. If people reject it, well, it's nice knowing ya. Either way, it's looking pretty grim.

Me: Please stop being so negative Also me: Nah y’all gonna died, so why even try

@Workdove I think we have a catalyst for that now, don't you...

cakeman son Global warming is natural. I'm sorry if you think otherwise.

Blockman Zan oh well thx for telling me

no, the climate was supposed to be cooling. instead it's warming 170x faster than natural climate change

Yes, Yes it was

F

Right and now west Bengal will become bengal

@@randomdude9135 i told will

@@randomdude9135 but is should be bengal as now there is no west bengal..... it is bengal cuz bangladesh had parted way with us....

rest in pizza my dear friend

F

KajiRider1997 I guess they didn't want to stir controversy with the young-earthers

lol true. though looking back I made a mistake too. that's 7500bce not 7500 years old.