USAF Lockheed C-5M Super Galaxy Wittman Regional Airport - Oshkosh 2016 

Larry Clark, I applaud your comment. As an employee, you're a company's most valuable asset.

Yes, indeed, a lot of engineering man hours applied to the design of this aircraft. Same with the Boeing 747-100. My Dad wore employee badge number 120 for Grumman Aircraft Eng. Co., Bethpage, NY, he joined them in 1934 he was shop foreman for many years at Plant 2 - I learned a lot about planes from him when I was a little kid. I grew up in Village of Hempstead, NY, about 1.5 miles west of Mitchel AFB, and got to see nearly all of the MATS Atlantic Div., piston powered transport and troop carrier planes when I was really little, around 1956 thru 1961. I loved my childhood!

CF-6 jet engine with landing then jet blow to braked-short landing, but- not having jet blow to braked with TF-39 Jet engine why too long landing,,, C-17 with jet engine with jet blow to fast braked - very short landing

She has new engines

Set slot of records with these new engines

Gwyyquezcbwmts

E scene end b

3rd.

@@rickdavis3593 2nd

@@juliusadams1931 Stratolaunch, AN 225, C5

The big problem I have with the Antonov is they only built 1, or 1 1/2, or whatever.

Hi, Magnus, The fog you see on take off is a water injection stream applied to all engines to increase the power or thrust output for the engines for short durations, typically applied at low speeds and at take off.

CF-6 jet engine with landing then jet blow to braked-short landing, but- not having jet blow to braked with TF-39 Jet engine why too long landing,,, C-17 with jet engine with jet blow to fast braked - very short landing

@@iginiobluevest9259 WHAT?

No, it’s better in every way.

The toilet - just kidding!

I believe that's the APU exhaust

Depending on which port you are referring to. The two close to each other are for pressurization, the one by its self on the lower part of the fuselage is the APU exhaust.

Apu exaust

Unfortunately. As vf84tcat1 commented, "Without the awesome sound of those TF-39 turbines, this Tiger sounds toothless". Trade-off of sounding badass for efficiency haha

Tom's Planes ehh true. But I can understand that they needed more reliable engines for better reliability and efficiency, thrust, range, and payload. I support it, but I do miss the old TFs. The C-5s are still awesome to look at and see though. It’s for the best, and to make sure they stay in the sky.

I have! Dover AFB has quite the inventory, visited their AMC Museum and airshow many times in the past. At their 2017 airshow they had the C-5 pop flares in a photo pass as well as perform a tactical short field landing along with the C-17. Always fun to see the big birds do their thing

@@TomsPlanes Cool, I grew up not far from Charleston AFB back when all the planes were still camo painted, I was actually USAF active for 20 years & my first base was Travis, I was there for 3 years...

@@vinewood8295 Awesome, bet that allowed you to see a lot of cool things over the years. Anything in particular stand out?

Nope, well then again yeah. The first time I saw a C-17 reverse thrust into a parking spot that was pretty cool. You know at some locations we have planes parked like cars, planes like the C-130 because you know a C-130 can also backup but seeing a jet engine aircraft do it was like jaw dropping the first time...

Heat from the brakes. A lot of plane to stop in such a short distance

@@TomsPlanes thanks. I wasn't sure.

Weed

Only one is operating isn’t it?

@@Kanti12311 yes only one is operation BUT IT IS THE WORLD LARGEST

It's Ukrainian.

Нет никогда!

Yeah, some copying going on, but the other way around. The C-5 Galaxy first flew in 1968. The AN-124 Ruslan didn't fly until 14 years later in 1982!

Dimosh - You dumbass, do some fucking research before you open that shithole on your face!

@@holeefuk4217 LOL easy man.

Нет никогда!

Absolutely.