Have to agree. The 2.0 V Trail seems smaller to me also. I’m an M40 in everything except the old Mocs. The 2.0 does feel smaller and harder to break in. But I do like the really grippy sole. I feel comfortable running down inclines on any type of surface with this soles.
I totally agree with you; I got 2 pairs of V-Trail 1st gen., blue and orange, and I'm using them a lot less to allow them to last. The 2nd gen. it's been a total disappointment, for me.
I agree about the V-Trail being the best shoe for running. I didn't get the 2.0 though because I didn't like the seams on the toes from the new reinforced fabric, so I switched to the V-Treks. I really really loved the V-treks, I like the outsole the best because it was firmer than the V-trails and it felt like it was more protective on rocky trails. However, because the V-treks are not designed for running, my big toe broke through the fabric after about 50 miles. So that was disappointing. Have you tried the V-treks?
What’s a good substitute for the original v trails? Looking for an everyday durable version that can do it all the same as you speak about the original v trails!
Great review. Totally agree. V-trail 1.0 were just perfect. I called them my trail running slippers. Yes the sole was softer and yeah it did hurt a bit in rocky downhills in the Alps but they were so comfy that I almost welcomed the pain😊. I've been cursing vibram since I had to replace them with 2.0. 😢 First time in 10 years of VFF that I got black big toes' nails😭 I have also an issue on the top on my right foot, too tight at the big toe's base, improved a bit after breaking them in (and stuffing a tennis ball in while at home). Can we send a petition to Vibram to bring the originals back?
