Vacuum Pressure Hydrogen fuel cell defeats high gas prices using hydrogen from H2O. 

Just buy a plastic container it'll last longer

$2 fix. And no mechanic needed.

Here they come car running off of water 💦 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NMH1pBAYgYs.html Here they come car running off of water💦

🧓 Son, have you seen my large canning jars around? They are not where I keep them🤨!

those are some good-ass pickles too

Bro... prices are wat higher than 4X. They should be $0.30/litre. The government is fuc*ing us hard

Just curious how much does fuel cost over in the US?

@Jupiter-rs4zl it really depends on where you live in the states. If you live more towards the Gulf of Mexico intends to be a little bit cheaper because that's where they were fine a lot of the fuel... Prices are anywhere from $2.90 per gallon to$6 a gallon in certain states. Thanks very much for the comment.

@Jupiter-rs4zl California is 5.99 a gallon averagely... traffic depends where you travel takes 17-45 minutes normally , LA is 45 minutes to 2 hours on a terribly accident filled day. So here on the coast we travel by time not by distance. If you own a V8 truck that runs 18+ gallons to the mile and if that 1 mile takes you 17 minutes due to traffic your looking at way more then 18 gallons for that one little trip since all your gas is spent on traffic and crawling under 5mph, wheras a little 4 cylinder honda is way more gas efficient at 30+ miles to the gallon. And electric is a fail, we get warnings all the time about our power grid being strained .

I'm always looking to save gas at all times. Might make a low cc motorized bicycle. But I did get me a max mpg spec 93 Ranger as well. Pretty amazed with it, wonder if the mileage can be increased.

Pickle jar and wires. I'm a Going to do this on a friend Car 1st To make sure I am doing This right

If not by that - you'll be disillusioned by the lack of MPG and performance gains.

do your home work its not tru. you battery will be empty befor you can start the car hahahahaha

I was coming to comment this 😂😂😂 dead

His cousin needed his 500ml beaker for a meth lab so he had to make due with what he had.

Context?

I'm assuming becaus of high gas price and he said double the mileage

That smoky swill you almost wanna spit out but always swallow

You can do the same thing with fuel injection just a little more difficult cause you have to send it through the intake manifold

@@anthonykocks3385would you need to reprogram the vehicle?

​I believe the car would adjust itself after awhile

Adding HHO to a fuel injection system would give you more power and less emissions but I think you’re right that you’d have to program the injectors spray to actually save on fuel

@timchapman8359 in some cases most definitely. But not in all circumstances. Manufacturers have been warned of this modification but it is so effective it has a very strange way of getting significant benefits. We have a new video coming out which will show some improvements we've made over the years be sure to subscribe and I thank you very much for your comment.

So big you can cause a new big bang ...😂😂😂😂

No need 😆

Yeah. But most of us are old enough not to be so stupid as to need warning labels.

His “dryer jug” is supposed to be filled with water and used as a makeshift flashback arrestor

He instaled a arrester after tank of water to avoid flashback fire.

It's just an HHO scam that was the most popular in 2000's.

Not a scam my friend.

We have a new video coming out when the timing is right that will show a much safer way of implementing the system. The Primary system itself hasn't changed much but you will find our improvements quite intriguing. Thanks very much for the comment, be sure and subscribe.

@@metalpresstvdoes that Silverado still run

holy fuck cant believe it just checking back after planning to set one up for years and now i got a 61 d200 so glad to see someone witha similar whip making it work. < 3

@@metalpresstvwhere’s it at?

@@metalpresstvwhen you making the video

😂

As long as he's not trying to sell the technology, he's fine.

JustinHit. I don’t think so. Just putting this video out is enough to get a death penalty.

this man does not live long this way. you should know if you separate water into hydrogen and oxygen, he forgets what else is released!!! for example, glow and pale,

Dominique meijer. Water consists of 2 Hydrogen atoms & 1 Oxygen atom (H2O). When you separate water into it’s two parts there is nothing left.

This is not a hydrogen generator. its a hydroxy booster...

Thou hast summoned me from the death, just as this comment.

The truth does not have an expiration date (Y)

and that's why it doesn't work. It can't generate nearly enough hydrogen to even turn the engine on revolution. Not powerful enough, because it's as the other commenter explained. It's oxy hydrogen and there is not NEARLY enough being generated by this little setup to make a damned bit of difference. Even as a supplement to gas. It take energy to make energy and this takes more than it makes.

Bill Does Stuff YOUR COMMENTS, WE ASSUME ARE BASED UPON YOUR OWN EXPERIENCE WITH YOUR OWN VEHICLE PRESENTLY ? ALONG WITH ALL THE OTHER NEIGHBORS, COMMENTING ?

We have a new video we're working on that will be out very soon. We show the installation greatly improved and some serious advancements we have made. We've also learned a few secrets that you should find interesting. Be sure and subscribe so you don't miss it. Thanks for the comment.

@@metalpresstvdid you ever finish recording that next video?

@@vinm8297 It's been in production for over a year and will be released as soon as we finish the last segment. We have installed the system on a 454 stroker but we had to get to 454 stroker in line, before we install it and that took a very long time. Divorced choke, non- electronic system, EMP proof, stuff like that and timing problems were quite difficult getting it lined out. Thanks for your patience and keep checking back.

@@metalpresstv awesome, can’t wait to see it!

Will this work on a fuel injection engine? ​@@metalpresstv

9v battery dropped into bottle with high dose of electrolite

It actually does not work. You introduce more air into the system and the fuel injectors will introduce more fuel therefore burning more fuel than normal............ Common Sense is a thing of the past my friends.

Wow, if only you could reproduce these results in actual tests you'd be a billionaire. Shame you're a liar.

Bullshit.

What was the dodge mpg like

@@stn7172 I have no idea gauge was broken

Hydrogen isn't all that flammable, even less than propane but when you have the other byproduct (oxygen) its very explosive and helps burn the gas more efficiently.

Hydrogen has a self combustion at think at 500 degrees Celsius vs gasoline at 240s degree Celsius so I don't know about that explosion idea with the tubing.

What sort of fuel saving did you get and is there a loss or gain in power?

@@sjg3890 i can't tell you exact numbers, but you do save on fuel and it doesn't require that much power to make it work. you could easily produce the gas for free using solar power from a few good solar panels.

Do you have a video out?

Exactly. Thanks for your comment.

Christina Eckels I like that it’s made mostly of trash that would otherwise end up in a landfill.

Why China don't make like this or US

@@a.freeamerican7267 PVC creates static.. bad idea.... glass does not

How often do you change plates?

😂😂😂

cbmbdb If I had such a setup under my hood I’d show it to everyone! Then I’d tell them that I hardly ever have to buy gas! That way I’d look smart and they’d be jealous.

I ....I can't tell if you understood that he was joking

@@FrankGutowski-ls8jt lier

randell gribben You mean liar, I assume.

really hold my moonshine.

This is the modern equivalent of the first person to light their fart

@@oneplaneteer1708 I assume you’ve installed one on your vehicle and gotten terrible results?

@@oneplaneteer1708 methane

@@oneplaneteer1708 I’m sure you’ve built an HHO generator that works properly? If not, go sit on the porch.

@@oneplaneteer1708 your logic would be solid except for the fact that Jesus has changed the world in countless ways and also lives rent free in your head. I hope God opens the gospel to you and your family as well, AMEN

Really lol 😆 🤣

Mom's pissed

@@Brittvanegas no I'm not

Maybe so, but you didn't make one yourself i bet! Go back to your mommys basement and get online...hurry hurry!

@@gunguyforlife630 🤦👆 this guy.😂

Actually this system in no way interferes with the law of the conservation of energy. The engine itself is only burning about 80% of the fuel the rest is consumed by the catalytic converter. What we are doing is burning all of the fuel in the cylinder instead of the emission system. All gains come from the gasoline.

@@metalpresstv Then it would burn more gas because the load on the alternator which powers the the battery that the cells uses. The only way this setup would actually work is by creating the energy from another source not using the battery or alternator.

@@suoppsdn9751 20% more gasoline is a lot of energy. I understand you need to back the powers that be and stand with all the forces of science. I would like to point out that if you think these interesting little crafts that have been shown to you by your government that are flying around are powered by lithium batteries you're sadly mistaken. There's more to science than what they teach you in school and college. We have a new video coming out soon so be sure and subscribe thanks for all the comments my friend.

​@@metalpresstv Allow me: In the video you state that the HHO generator consumes 29 amps. Assuming your truck runs at 12 volts DC, that is 29 (A) x 12 (V) = 348 (W). Your truck is probably a few horsepower and 1 horsepower is ~750 watts. There alternator is spun by the pulley. The pull is spun by the belt. The belt is spun by the engine's pully. The engine's pully is spun by the crankshaft. The crankshaft is spun by pistons pushing on it. The pistons are pushed by hot expanding gases. The hot expanding gases are the result of a chemical reaction between air(21% O2) + gasoline + HHO. The air comes from the air intake and oxidizes the gasoline. The HHO comes from the HHO gas generator. The HHO gas generator pulls 29 amps. Assuming your truck runs at 12 volts DC, that is 29 (A) x 12 (V) = 348 (W). Your truck is probably a few horsepower and 1 horsepower is ~750 watts. There alternator is spun by the pulley. The pull is spun by the belt. The belt is spun by the engine's pully. The engine's pully is spun by the crankshaft. The crankshaft is spun by pistons pushing on it. The pistons are pushed by hot expanding gases. The hot expanding gases are the result of a chemical reaction between air(21% O2) + gasoline + HHO. The air comes from the air intake and oxidizes the gasoline. The HHO comes from the HHO gas generator. The HHO gas generator pulls 29 amps... The only NEW energy input into the system is the gasoline and air burning. All other steps CONSUME energy. The HHO generator will only produce a small fraction of the power out into it. The rest escapes from the water as heat. The HHO generator is costing an extra 1/2 horsepower and providing very little back. Thermodynamics is a bitch.

@@thetruepetre2771 I'm not sure if you caught in the hundreds of comments where I've explained where the energy comes from. This engine wastes up to 20% of the gasoline. We are not in any way powering the engine with this gas. What we are doing is trying to burn as much of the 20% of the wasted gasoline which is wasted and burns in the catalytic converter. I understand your disbelief. There are hundreds of video showing and proving that HHO does not work. And they are right. Without a vacuum you cannot inject HHO into an engine and see any results at all. It was probably 17 years ago now when we started doing this and we discovered that fact very early on. Unfortunately we had already shared how to do this with many people and some people were disillusioned and thought it worked by squirting it into the carburetor. We proved it did not work and we moved on. When we put this system into the vacuum we had immediate changes in the engine. The smell of the exhaust changed and the catalytic converter remained cool and water began pouring out of the tailpipe. This system was tested by running the engine out of gas multiple times with the cell on and off and we proved it did boost the mileage considerably. We make no claims of over unity. We tell you exactly where the energy comes from and that is the gasoline and not the hho. A more efficient burning of the gasoline is all we are doing. Car makers do not make efficient engines and I think there's a reason. Just imagine if you made a vehicle that burned all of the fuel and it required no catalytic converter. Do you honestly think they can't do that? There's a reason that engines burn dirty. I appreciate your insightful comments and I hope you appreciate mine. You can rest assured I know all of the science behind it because I've been doing it so long. We have a new video on this topic and if you can tell from the age of the video it's been a long time. There's a reason we're not releasing it yet because it's not the right time. The time is coming and when we do I really hope you'll watch it. Thanks very much for the comment.

HAHAHAHHAA 32+ dildo know-nothing losers

Can someone make a parts list?

@Dave Pin do you think a 2000 ford ranger computer needs to be modified?

@Dave Pin for the engine not to run too rich.

He left out a few critical statements here. Introducing more air into the vacuum line will cause fuel injectors to introduce more fuel, therefore burning way more fuel than you did before. Also without a good way to vent the gas you would most likely build up enough HHO gas under the hood to kill everyone in the truck................................If it's on the internet and someone made a extra long video about it = IT MUST BE TRUE? XD

Pretty sure water to 2H+O is highly endothermic😅

@@josephvinson7348 Have you access to Google?

EFIE (Electronic Fuel Injection Enhancer) The EFIE is intercepting signals from the oxygen sensor to the computer and fools the computer by giving it false exhaust readings from the Oxygen sensor.This is necessary because the computer is set up for a regular burn of fuel and compensates for the more efficient and cleaner burn by dumping more gasoline into the engine (until it gets the reading it expects) which ruins your fuel savings. Gasoline burns better (cleaner less waste) with HHO gas because the increase burn temperature . You can buy a EFIE on the internet or if you have the skills you can build one.

Theyve been using the current EFI systems with o2 sensors since halfway thru 1985.

This setup does not work on any car because it uses more power to split water molecules than you get out.

The truck in the video is using an EFI system...

An efficient electrolizer must be used EFIE device or similar must be used Ignition timing (ATDC) must be changed Even compression ratio adjustments (more) That way you will get the most out of this, otherwise expect the ussual 10% only improvement.

i want to do this .

How was it?

You should update everyone on how that truck is now probably in the scrap yard and you've gone through batteries and alternators like crazy

@@jimmio3727 actually loaned it to a friend and he promptly ran it into a tree.

I have seen and heard a lot of that over the years. I do know that pulsing can be more efficient as it allows time for the bubbles to get out of the way of the plates. I have yet to see anyone produce the Ferocious bubbling that can be achieved running the Cell at 100 amps. If they can do that with pulsing frequencies at say 5 or 10 amps I would be totally impressed. Thanks for the comment.

Any idea of what frequency, or frequencies?

@@TheHeartCharmer you need to use the 11th harmonic (2 frequencies, 1 at11x the other0, than with a sine wave generator(2) find the resonant frequency of a water molecule. This will produce hydrogen at a milliamp electrical load,. Separate the anode and cathodes as each will produce the gasses separately.(safety). A membrane installed in jar can produce electricity from the reassociation of the unused gas to water.

@@ranmanification Ok. Thanks for saying. Wish I had more time to experiment. Have you successfully achieved this yourself, may I ask out of interest?

Electrolyte:water ratio can also lower amperage.

Use a potentiometer 100 Watts 200 Ohms or something close. The electricity for elektrolyses must be dc so you use the battery to start. When your engine is running use a transformer from your alternator to 3.5 Volts. ( 10 Amps * 3.5 Volts is 35 Watts ) and put an AC-DC converter on the secundaire side. On the DC side you put the potentiometer. The hydrogen contains 3 times more energy than liquid petrol gas. Use original lpg tubes to your engine.

@@marcelmolenaar5684 not sure what you're saying but it doesn't have to be DC for mixed gas, only if your separating the O and H.

you will get more amps with a stainless egg beater and steel wool

High grade stainless is a must for longevity. New video is coming out very soon. Be sure and subscribe. Thank you for the comment.

Go big or go home

It must take energy to break the water into hydrogen and oxygen. This energy is coming from the alternator. I think the alternator doing its thing as a generator with a load on it, supplying electricity to make the hydrogen, is in turn putting more load on the engine because you don't get something for nothing. This increases the gas mileage but some of the energy to move the car is coming from the burning hydrogen and the system ends up breaking even or possibly worse than using the gasoline alone.

You need too get a kit { I got it on Ebay } to hook to the O2 sensor to tell the computer it is dumping way too much fuel into the system I was getting 55 mpg in a 87 Dodge grand caravan with a set up of a HHO generator The gas burns clean without the regulator you will burn MORE GAS Im babysitting my grandson so I can not look in my shop what that O2 regulator is called ON NEWER cars they changed the O2 sensors to where you can not trick them with a battery current to make it cut back the fuel flow to run these set ups

That's why I said it doesn't work.

Hence the explanation from Jon.

www.defensenews.com/land/2017/04/03/hydrogen-fuel-cell-technology-could-bring-stealth-to-army-vehicles/

Have you seen the date of the video lol

Back in the day, I didn't believe it, but some classmates in college bought an HHO device that supplemented the fuel in the car, and it did work. This is not perpetual energy. It wouldn't run without real fuel. Think they only saw a 20% jump in fuel efficiency ...still not bad though.

@@jerrogance Yes, why does it seem like every guru here doesn't realize it's an addition to the gas and not changing the fuel to hydrogen. It's so fucking obvious even a 10 year old would get it.

I find that confusing. As an electrician you should know that the number 10 gauge solid copper wire won't suffer from wicking when put into the water. Also, that wire is fully capable of handling 40 amp load. You see double circuit breakers on either side of the load. The only thing that would be questionable is the light switch. But as an electrician, I'm sure you're aware that those circuits are designed to not catch on fire. They undergo rigorous testing that normal toggle switches do not. I certainly do not condone anyone else replicating this however has an electrician you should be intrigued, not horrified. But, I completely understand. I respect your judgment. Do not replicate what you see here. Thanks very much for the comment. We have a new video coming out soon that shows some definite safety improvements that I think you would approve of. Don't forget to subscribe.

Can i go fuseless?

Just like the atom bomb is used as trigger in hydrogen bomb.

29A is about 400W. depending on alternator voltage. For this to be practical, the increase in efficiency would have to generate in excess of 400W to be practical. Also, the electrolysis cell in this video is very inefficient as it is subject to huge resistive power losses which do nothing in terms of gas generation - after some time, you're just boiling water, the temperature which is reduced due to the vacuum. The neutral plates I saw do help a bit but do note there is still resistive path between 12V plate and the ground plate. Not only is H2 and O2 going into the engine, so too is water vapour which tends to reduce the efficiency of the burn. Note that excess H2 and O2 is actually considered a loss to the engine because this will never recoup the power that was extracted by the engine to generate that H2 and O2. It would be better if 1. The voltage to the plates were reduced to about 2V, will also need bigger plate area to compensate for lower voltage. Plate spacing can be reduced, but not too much otherwise gas generation will be reduced. 2. The second bottle needs to be higher than the first with its bottom connected by some tubing to return condensed water back to first bottle. 3. The second bottle also needs to be packed full of some type of brass wool which will serve two purposes a. if any flash back occurs, the flame will be extinguished before reaching the main gas production bottle, preventing an explosion b. The brass wool will cool the water vapour to liquid (hopefully) - Note the brass wool needs to be thermally connected to some cold sink. Under vacuum, the boiling point of water is reduced and you want to prevent water vapour getting into your engine. 4. The power is regulated, perhaps if this was fed via a computer program that monitors engine parameters via OBD2 port. No sense in pumping excess H2 and O2 into the cylinder than the amount of fuel in there. This should keep the efficiency of the system over a wider RPM. I am not doubting the increase burn efficiency but am very skeptical. None of the videos I have seen show the vehicle on a dyno with and without the generator so it's kind of hard to believe these guys. Hard to know if some kind of bias is involved. Perhaps they are driving more efficiently with the generator installed and therefore show better fuel economy.

@@adam3141 Interesting info.

@@lracegroeg7990 $$ and that vehicle was "lost" by my ex wife

Keep a spare alternator in the trunk lolololololol

Did you forget about the second law of thermodynamics? These fake stories are getting out of hand, people dont know shit electrodynamics or physics.

@@zo0ot404 sir, my story is definitely not fake

@@jasonrist6582 Just idling your engine is over a 600 rpms. Driving a 2.5 liter 4cly motor is about 150 cubic inches. That's 37.5 cubic inches per a cylinder. A cylinder fires ever 2 full rotations. So in a minute of idling at 600 rpms your engine will use 11,250 cubic inches of air a minute at just idle. That's a 187.5 cubic inches a second of air. You're not producing even 2 cubic inches a second. But don't forget that it's h2O 2 parts hydrogen 1 part oxygen. So 1/3 of the gas isn't even hydrogen it's oxygen. So not even 1% of the air being taken into the cylinder is hydrogen. The only thing being accomplished here is the alternator is working harder for the high amp draw dragging the motor down more reducing fuel mileage. This is why water isn't used as fuel in a motor vehicle. Now don't forget we don't drive at 600 RPMs most people will be around 1800 rpms at cruising speed. That's 3x the amount of air with still the same hydrogen production. So now ur way below the threshold of .03% hydrogen in the cylinder. Using a spark arrestor on the output hose to keep from blowing the jar up you would be hard pressed to even candle a flame let alone put anything measurable in every cylinder 900x a minute cruising down the highway at the speed limit. Why be a liar. This is why we don't use water as fuel... Takes way more energy to make it then it produces. This is why in Iceland we use compressed hydrogen from a fueling station. You can't make the volume on the fly and if u could the energy I took to make it wouldn't be returned so you wouldn't be going far. You should delete ur fake story just makes u look bad to any semi intelligent person

You're making the assumption that we're powering the engine with HHo. That is a misunderstanding. Not all of the gasoline is burned in the combustion process. We are simply burning as much as possible in the cylinder instead of the catalytic converter. Any gain at all comes from the gasoline that we are using and not the HHO. New video coming soon so be sure and subscribe. Thanks very much for the comment.

​@@metalpresstv. Nope. You are making the assumption here. There's a good reason why the world is not powered by electrolysing water under vacuum. It takes more energy to break the valent atomic bonds to release the hydrogen and oxygen than the resulting gases can themselves supply. To claim that you are getting better mileage or better performance would be to claim that you are pulling extra energy out of your ass. Sorry, but the second law of thermodynamics says that you're a liar.

won't the steam (water) corrode the engine instead of just cleaning it?

@@duhovnagozba1770 You're not thinking about this correctly.

@@narutofanz4 can you explain how I'm wrong - why won't it corrode?

We're using solid copper wire, not stranded. Copper skins itself over and protects itself. As far as the plates go it's extremely high grade stainless non magnetic. It will last a very very long time. We have a new video coming out soon so be sure and subscribe. Thanks for the comment.

@@duhovnagozba1770 because rust needs oxygen, most of the o2 explodes in the cylinder anyways and out the exhaust

Be sure and subscribe because we're working on a new video covering this topic. We show an improvement that makes it safer to operate. We have a different design plate setup that also produces an extremely large amount of gas. Thanks very much for the comment.

@@metalpresstv 👍🍻

Car makers are about to if not already releasing HHO cars. It's supposed to be the latest. I do believe the setup will work, and I'm planning on making the same setup. My only concern is the engines internal parts getting rusted. Like the piston rings, valves, etc. Mainly because the engine wasn't designed for water. I'm planning on having some sort of lubrication to the setup to avoid that. Now if the engine was manufactured to keep from getting rusted. I don't think there would be a problem, but may just be the solution to global warming.

@@bobt7531 Cars fully powered by HHO work very well, that isn't the problem I'm highlighting. The issue is that energy is that electrolysis wastes quite a lot of energy by producing heat, this fact combined with the inefficiencies inherent in a alternator means that you would up burning more fuel with this system. Not less. In physics you don't ever get more energy out of a system than you put in. If energy is released by a chemical change in one direction, it will cost you at least that much energy to change it back to the original state. but there is waste at every stage. burning fuel to produce movement as waste in terms of heat and sound; turning that movement into electricity produces some waste heat and light; using that electricity to generate HHO produces waste heat; and finally burning HHO to produce mechanical movement wastes energy in terms of sound and heat. All you have done in this complicated process is waste the energy that you produced by burning fuel. If you were adding an HHO tank to your vehicle that you filled up at home the story would be different; but this particular system makes no sense.

Well, fooey on you. J/K Thanks for stopping me from blowing myself up for nothing.

So your telling me hydrogen gas has net 0 joules of energy and isnt a highly explosive gas. They couldn't tune the fuel pump to restict fuel pressure either? Think a bit harder than highschool science class bud. I felt dumber reading your comment.

I assure you the gas is quite energetic. Some engines only burn 80% of the fuel or less. That leaves a lot of room for improvement. It is not over unity, it is just using a little more energy to bring that efficiency level really high. Thanks for the comment.

I’m guessing it’s about 1/100th horse power minus the drag on the on the alternator. When the wires going into the glass jar “HYDROGEN FUEL CELL” haha he will blow the shit out of the engine bay.

@@adriantaylor9535 12V at 30A is 0.36KW, about 0.5hp. Never gonna get those back from his "fuel cell"

No one said anything about more horspower. He said more miles.

@@sondresrbraten205 You are taking away power(hp) from the engine to produce hydrogen and you gotta give those back and plus some extra to increase the efficiency and get more miles. But you use more than give back and thats why this can't work. So yeah, it is about horsepower.

@@Stripcherry3 yeah i know this won't work. My point was only that he never said that the engine would get more power. 👍

its very simple... electrolysis generate's hydrogen and oxygen from water... you feed it into the intake of the engine (since its not liquid like gase thats it) an engine will suck in as much as it needs to run. backfires are easily supressed with a spring top bottle.. backfire = the top pops up release gas then closes.. totatally safe. if I recall nasa use's hydrogen as fuel for the simple fact... what they said... "Hydrogen is the best.. SAFEST FUEL in the world"

@@harleyme3163 First problem, i see here, it is BS. Before you start pissing on me i will explain: 1. This is NOT a fuel cell. It is a standard HHO generator. 2. It costs more to supply energy to this system then to use gasoline. Best electrolysis HHO generators operate at about 70% efficiency. I doubt this home made device is that good. And he would need a few tons of batteries for it to work. If you have that much power in a form of electricity, why convert it into chemical power with 30% loss? Use it directly - inverters have about 98% efficiency. Electric motors are similar with efficiency. 3. Let's assume 2l motor, 4 stroke. So it takes 1l of fuel mixture for one revolution. This little jar wouldn't produce enough mixture to run any engine besides maybe a little few cc toy motor. Yes it may work, but it will have a very lean mixture and no power. That's a beauty of hydrogen, it will work with very low concentration too. 4. If this is a normal gasoline engine, it will get destroyed quickly. Water, different working temperature, different behavior of combustion. Wonderful comparison of combustion gasoline and hydrogen motors was done by channel "Engineering Explained" - "The Difference Between Gasoline And Hydrogen Engines"

@Rich B soon

@@ogi22 You dont have 2g of brain.

@@sikismeker You are right. In fact i have about 1,3kg of that in my head. Thank you for noticing ;D

Yes, but isn't it due to condensation, other than a exhaust.

@@joe3414 I meant water as in H20 not just the liquid form of water. So H20 vapor is created by combusting fuel and then when the vapor cools it turns to liquid water. For the sake of simplicity, you can take gasoline as C8H18. Then, C8H18 + 12.5O2 ->8CO2 + 9H20

Not sure why you would think that. We are just burning all of the fuel in the cylinder instead of the catalytic converter. The boost comes from normally wasted gasoline. Thanks for the comment.

Like a nitrous port.

Whats the technicals behind this? Why are so many people saying it doesn't work.? You sound like you know what you're talking about. Is there anyway we can chat?

@@YNYNYNYNYNYN in theory it works. It absolutely produces hydrogen. If its hooked up correctly and monitored by scan tool data, that is the most definitive proof of if it works or not. I'd say as a base run, get on flowing highway, maintain 55-60, engage generator and figure a way to pulse width modulate the ground for the new "purge" solenoid you would add. If the fuel trim numbers aren't going negative, there's too much O2 in the exhaust so the car will just add the same fuel. I would need this all played out to condemn it. Theres the efficiency of the total thing at play as well. Someone posted some number like it takes 238 joules to produce 200 joules worth of hydrogen. I'm not calling that fact, but infinite momentum/energy has yet to be released to the general public. If I had time and money to donate to this science experiment, I would. I've produced hydrogen off a cell just like this. The yield is small even up to 10 amps. I think the answer to volumetric efficiency of this would be to increase the plates size and numbers. More surface area to ionize= more hydrogen/more efficiently using the size of the jar/generator

@@YNYNYNYNYNYN part 2! Your car monitors needed fuel by a calculation of load by,rpm,air temp, coolant temp, manifold pressure, barometric pressure, grams per second of air flowing past the mass air flow sensor, voltage from the throttle position sensor and in closed loop it looks at the oxygen sensor. Closed loop is hot engine, hot cats, hot oxygen sensors. Oxygen sensors produce voltage based on oxygen content in the exhaust. If oxygen becomes more prevalent by adding hydrogen+ its oxygen by product, car adds gasoline to reach a stoichiometric mixture. The car has no logic programmed for the primate trying to circumvent the fuel source.

@@YNYNYNYNYNYN id also not discount the people who have actually built this and claim to buy less gas. Vs keyboard warriors who looked a bunch of stuff up on Google and just don't agree its doing anything, so iTs StOoPiD

Thanks man. I'm going to speak with my mechanic mate and ask him to translate this for me in a much simplified way i appreciate your information. I really want to do this.

wouldnt filling the other jar with plain water prevent this?

You had that much power draw and you SAVED fuel?....no...you did not.

The arrestor jar is self filling and drains back to the main cell when turned off due to a thermally initiated vacuum.

​@@metalpresstv he said a "flashback" arrester. If any HHO gas ignites further down the line and comes back toward the HHO generator it'll blow up everything in the chain. A flashback arrester creates a smaller controlled explosion instead of exploding your HHO generator jar. What I'm assuming you made is more of a pressure overflow jar, to keep your HHO generator from overpressurizing and cracking, but really all you've added is just a container of excess HHO gas waiting to explode if it sparks.

Still here. With something still to offer when the time is right. Ty for the comment

@@metalpresstv haha Hell yeah! 👍

hey my friend i live in mexico as well and are interested in building these so we can make a cheap help out poor people ti=ype of buisness i want to try to make some of these and test them out so i can help out peoople who have old v8 car or 6 cylinder cars so they can run efficiently

oil business has nothing to do with this. it's mother nature and her laws of physics that ensures, that such a setup would never work.

Your beleif that "big oil" is keeping this away from you and not seeing that your own inability to see that it actually doesn’t work is what's keeping you poor. You can't create energy out of nothing. The electricity needed to create the hydrogen comes from the generator/alternator, the energy needed to make the alternator work comes from.. You guessed it, the engine, and where does the engine get it's power from? The fuel, the freaking fuel! You could drive a car on hydrogen, but it's not possible to create it with energy from the same engine you're trying to operate of that hydrogen. Understood? (I must be insane even trying to cure stupid)

@@MrSilvertech and yet still rust out

Salt on the roads eats it alllllllll

@@RobertELee420 especially where i live. Its brutal

Also, even if you could produce enough hydrogen, taking into consideration the Sankey flow, where 33% of power is lost to exhaust heat, 29% to the cooling system, 5% in mechanical loss and another 5% to radiation, there's only 28% of combustion used for power. F1 cars barely reach 35% efficiency with millions of dollars in tech. Compare the specific energy density of gasoline vs hydrogen, which hydrogen falls way, way short of gasoline on. It's impossible to achieve efficiency beyond this point with internal combustion engines with gasoline and especially with hydrogen. Then you have to consider the drastic change in flame front speed of the combustion of gasoline vs hydrogen, the engine ignition timing is way off from what would be required of hydrogen combustion. You would experience almost catastrophic pre-ignition.

The hose that goes into the inlet, is connected after the O2 sensor, actually. This way you odnt allow the computer to get confused about the 'richer air' mixture and start sending more gasoline into the process.

@@onlinebills9169 the o2 sensor is in the exhaust FFS.

@@onlinebills9169 Bra where are your oxygen sensors.....? 😅

@@elemele4real I left mine with your mom. Any other questions?

This is definitely a different approach from that. I myself owned an Edelbrock water injector. It is pretty amazing they quit making all of that. We have a new video coming out on this topic very soon so be sure and subscribe. Thank you very much for the comment.

My father in law had one on his big motorhome in the 1970s or so. It was made by Speer and ran on manifold vacuum. He was able to advance the timing a couple degrees and got better performance and gas mileage, too...@@metalpresstv

Alternator gonna turn similar rpm range no matter what and the torque it needs to function is minimal.

Catalyse a more complete burn?

I know. He's going to die mysteriously in about 30-40 years.

Unfortunately, stupidity is rarely fatal. Hydrogen implosion counteracts gasoline's explosive pressure... I doubt the cartels have any problem with this guy showing people how to reduce gasoline efficiency.

@@hintzofcolorconcepts: What is most interesting about this device is that it can't even make enough hydrogen to interfere with the combustion of the gasoline vapors.

@@timhallas4275 Sucks cause that's how they all go. More people need to learn this fast

@Frank Wiley Bullshit.

If you understand the physics and the chemistry involved here, electricity should not be hard to get your head around... At the simplest level, it's like plumbing. Study up, and follow safety rules.

You should learn thermodynamics first so you understand why this video is fake and this would never work and save yourself the trouble and making it.

Combustion of the fuel is not near 100%. Even on brand new vehicles. What would they sell in 10 years if ICE were at their peak this year or the next one.

Where did you come up with new vehicles running at 100% efficiency? They do make controllers so you can take advantage of different fuels. Ever went to drag race. Combustion engines still use carburetors. Fuel injection is just easier to control.

You're too stupid to have any kind of relevant opinion about pretty much anything.

Dude... this would never work SMFH

@@blanksender7808 you have actual evidence, or just insults?

Magic Yeti Dude, my jacked Titan loves those lil critters.. Specially the lil velociraptors, raw!

Yeah it's amazing how long those dinosaurs keep us going

This is as helpful to the environment as a Prius is. By that I mean only dumb people don't understand that neither helps.

You don’t think it will melt?

The plastic jug and lid that is

@@VinelandVinny Good point on the plastic melting. I would try a plastic jar and lid filled with water - no electric flow - and see if it can hold up to the heat. I did say if you use a metal lid to use rubber grommets for the wires for the best protection from shorting. If you could also line the inner walls of a metal jar that would be best, but glass to me looks like an accident waiting to happen - as is this whole project because Hydrogen is involved.

The bad thing about plastic is it might be able to handle the heat but when you combine vacuum and heat it's pretty hopeless. Just my two cents. It video coming soon, thanks guys.

@@metalpresstv I hear ya! I am now thinking a metal lid with rubber grommets for the wires, and a metal jar with some kind of insulation inside just incase the electrodes inside get jarred (no pun intended) around. Glass is just too fragile for my nerves.

I can't publicly sanction anyone actually doing this, but I can tell you we have a new video that shows an improved version and a lot of detailed information. We will release this video when the time is right. Be sure and subscribe so you don't miss it. Thanks very much for the comment.

@@metalpresstv I will subscribe and will be waiting

Yeah but I guess it skips the step of having to separate it and then having to reintroducing oxygen to the hydrogen. He probably has to clean it more than he drives it

@@kunkeypander6293 No need to "reintroduce" the O2 (I assume you mean from the split). Hydrogen burns just fine in open air. Normal air will be enough, in fact adding O2 from the split could make it unstable and explode because it is indeed an oxidizer.

The government needs shit that doesn't work?

This is for the unintelligent. Zero motor vehicles have ran off of water and zero ever will. Just idling your engine is over a 600 rpms. Driving a 2.5 liter 4cly motor is about 150 cubic inches. That's 37.5 cubic inches per a cylinder. A cylinder fires ever 2 full rotations. So in a minute of idling at 600 rpms your engine will use 11,250 cubic inches of air a minute at just idle. That's a 187.5 cubic inches a second of air. You're not producing even 2 cubic inches a second. But don't forget that it's h2O 2 parts hydrogen 1 part oxygen. So 1/3 of the gas isn't even hydrogen it's oxygen. So not even 1% of the air being taken into the cylinder is hydrogen. The only thing being accomplished here is the alternator is working harder for the high amp draw dragging the motor down more reducing fuel mileage. This is why water isn't used as fuel in a motor vehicle. Now don't forget we don't drive at 600 RPMs most people will be around 1800 rpms at cruising speed. That's 3x the amount of air with still the same hydrogen production. So now ur way below the threshold of .03% hydrogen in the cylinder. Using a spark arrestor on the output hose to keep from blowing the jar up you would be hard pressed to even candle a flame let alone put anything measurable in every cylinder 900x a minute cruising down the highway at the speed limit. If u think Stan Myers ran a dune buggy of water learn how acetylene is made. You take the gas off the top of the tank after u add the water.

Hi

You do this or what you say, and you will carry a time explosive ready to burst very soon.

Lol no this doesn't do anything.

You're going to wind up a stain on your driveway when the hydrogen based bomb you're building levels your car. I just hope a camera is running.

@@JohnDoe-mx1sq ehh it's pretty small output and it's in glass not much compression. Burn the car up likely. Blow up not at all.

@@magicalphones not you, Ron replacing the fuel tank with a huge tank full of water and plates.

Gasoline produces water, all exhausts have water in them.

@@Jordan-rb28 not as much as hydrogen

@@Scott.Farkus Dude you should see mine at lest a 1/4 cup drips out every time I drive even a short drive like 30 miles I checked the fluid level i'm not losing any fluid

@@punker4Real That's what she said

Burning any hydrocarbon fuel produces water. That's why they are called hydrocarbons. All exhaust systems are designed to be in contact with it. 🤦

It's completely useless.

They were pushing it heavy in the 70s and 80s. Then companies like chevron lobbied against it

It would be too hard to tax water.

If distance is very near for example 1mm, voltage between the electrode is 2v, and give enough pressure (1/2psi) then in 12v 1a KOH 2% (30gram KOH in 1500ml water) can make very big output gas around 1LPM with maximum temprature around 35c. If 25a is not efficient, need a lot of KOH and for long time water become hot. You can see how it's made in my RU-vid.

@@vincentcliong lol a litre a minute is worthless... Just idling your engine is over a 600 rpms. Driving a 2.5 liter 4cly motor is about 150 cubic inches. That's 37.5 cubic inches per a cylinder. A cylinder fires ever 2 full rotations. So in a minute of idling at 600 rpms your engine will use 11,250 cubic inches of air a minute at just idle. That's a 187.5 cubic inches a second of air. You're not producing even 2 cubic inches a second. But don't forget that it's h2O 2 parts hydrogen 1 part oxygen. So 1/3 of the gas isn't even hydrogen it's oxygen. So not even 1% of the air being taken into the cylinder is hydrogen. The only thing being accomplished here is the alternator is working harder for the high amp draw dragging the motor down more reducing fuel mileage. This is why water isn't used as fuel in a motor vehicle. Now don't forget we don't drive at 600 RPMs most people will be around 1800 rpms at cruising speed. That's 3x the amount of air with still the same hydrogen production. So now ur way below the threshold of .03% hydrogen in the cylinder. Using a spark arrestor on the output hose to keep from blowing the jar up you would be hard pressed to even candle a flame let alone put anything measurable in every cylinder 900x a minute cruising down the highway at the speed limit.

@@magicalphones I make normally for inhalation. 0.5LPM HHO is more than enough. You can check my design in my youtube. For using in engine i don't have experience. I use RO Housing 10 inch not jar. If don't want to blow the water must always full. In last bottle before output. If can distance between plate 0.5mm can very efficient. Using -nnnnn+nnnnn- drycell.

@@magicalphones ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-41IIEJaCdWY.html i didn't use it for engine but for inhalation.

@@magicalphones yes for engine is not efficient and make more things to maintain. I don't use it for engine.

It's not a fuel cell.

Actually, what I was trying to say was the electricity that comes out of the alternator is not like a battery. It is more of a pulsing. Thank you for the comment.

Spoken like a true pseudo-intellectual. Thanks for the comment.

@@metalpresstv there’s no such thing as “vacuum pressure”, genius. A vacuum, by definition, is a lack of pressure. There’s either pressure. Or vacuum. But yea. I’m the pseudo intellectual. Your dumbshit idea has been debunked about a thousand times. And here you are putting pickle jars under your hood. Dumbest. Shit. Ever. 1. Your little glue isn’t holding a vacuum 2. The moment you start extracting the hydrogen from the water, the “vacuum” disappears. 3. This isn’t even close to a “fuel cell” 4. Introducing electricity to water makes hydrogen. It also makes oxygen. Your brilliant mind doesn’t even consider the fact that introducing oxygen might be making the change you see or feel 5. There is an oxygen sensor that will adjust engine performance based on oxygen intake. If your car takes in too much oxygen, it’s running lean and the sensor will tell the computer to INJECT MORE FUEL. 6. You’re full of crap 💩

@@metalpresstv Bro you put pickle jars that do nothing, in a ICU car running on gasoline If this was real, people OTHER than redneck trash would be building it. 14 year old indian kids would be building them for the science fair.

It is actually still connected directly to the battery. A lot of modifications happened over the years. We've been very cautious about posting updates on this topic. HHO is misunderstood because there are two types of injection. Injecting into the carburetor in an atmospheric environment is quite useless. We found this out but continued on and eventually went to a vacuum system. For some reason the vacuum is key to the thermal properties and the performance of the unit. We have a new video coming out which will do it's very best to explain everything. We have taken a lot of time to get this right because frankly it's probably the last opportunity we're going to get. Please subscribe so you don't miss it. I don't waste people's time with a bunch of videos that just go on and on for views. The Next video will be the last video on this subject and hopefully will be able to put a nail in the coffin people thinking this technology does not function. It will not work on every single vehicle out there because frankly there's just so many. Thank you very much for the comment and I greatly appreciate your support. 😁

Caution higher Hz + the voltage can kill ya.

I try to avoid Gee M o myself. Ty for comment.

Bubbies...mmmm delicious

Lmfao 🤣!!! Haven’t laughed so hard at a comment in a while. Good one.

Current Science is nothing more than a religion. True science is building, testing, measuring and repeating. Thanks for the comment.

@@metalpresstvthe more you understand the scientific method (and science) the less you understand your reply