VIDEO: Dear Prudence- An Interview With Prudence Farrow Bruns 

Like Rikki Ducornet.

@@hoz49 or Pattie Boyd. She inspired quite a few masterpieces by more than one person.

...................... *_NO_*

Like Don McLean possibly

The best version, ever. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KhyygqGMiAo.html

cheeseball!

Just my thoughts.

Do you enjoy your name btw?

That’s pretty cool.😎

Nice! I would usually hear Martha my Dear. Being a dog lover (inspired by Paul's sheepdog, Martha) I appreciated the song even more!! 🐕💖

In short, an indictment of our educational system.

Thank YOU Mr. Ronnie Brown

She looks like her mom!!

Prudence is still a teacher of TM, her sister Mia explains in a recent documentary.

Yes. Absolutely !!!

haha Mia Farrow is not a kind person.

🤣 @ shooting angle. The camera can be a friend or enemy.

Wasn't she sexually assaulted by maharishi?

how odd, I just did too!

So did I - just now.

so did I!

Ditto

lol! i just did exactly the same! I saw the Mia's clip with Letterman and then came right here! (btw, Mia was damn freaking gorgeous!)

Hi I wished you had more manners, she is being interviewed and talks about a period you probably did not experience.

Willswalkingwest As opposed to you, who no one knows from Adam, who gives everyone a 10-minute update, for all 43 of the people who watched your rambling video.

Spot on!

@Hi I don't like being rude, contrarily to you. But sometimes one cannot help it. If you don't like this interview, what are you doing here? Oh, I get it. You cannot read the video titles!

She's "hawking" her book.

Sue Phelps try 1946

Robert Durst liked her too.

When it came out, I liked it, but didn't quite get it. Now I can hear it better.

I agree. Many college professors nowadays are from that generation. (Though they have begun retiring, sadly.) Many share similar values and life experiences. (Especially those in the arts and humanities departments.) In retrospect, I have felt fortunate to have had college professors both from the pre-60s era, as well as from the 60s generation: Both have their strengths - but they are worlds apart.

Yes. You are right. For me, their value lie in their professional expertise. Despite a jaded review by word of mouth, I never turned down an instructor´s expertise over his/her ability to entertain a class. If, in addition to the expertise the professor happened to be witty as well, then - well, yes, I enjoyed taking the course even better! Because teaching is, to an extent, a performative act as well: And because professors from different generations approach content delivery differently, often originally; not solely based on their scholarship, but also driven by the values and life experiences as they were within the environment that they came of age into themselves, it is indeed refreshing to transition between styles. Each one, having a different background, being capable of handling instruction differently. Scholarship and life experiences do not contradict, but reinforce the other in the context of the class situation but, in essence, merits due to hard work is what should matter the most, I agree. Thanks! for addressing my comment.

That´s fine ;-)

Cj Murray good catch

i always thought they were saying buffalo bill. which would have been better don't you think?

@@tomitstube No.

@@charleslascari7191 "hey buffalo bill, what did you kill". better.

It's @ 01:39

No,she never did.Poor John And George, Tried so hard but couldn’t even get her to open up her eyes.

He introduced the west to Indian mysticism and therefore away from Christ. The was the jump off point.

They did not collaborate with Eric Clapton. George brought him in because John and Paul were not overall interested in doing George's song's on the White Album. Lennon also was instrumental with Phil Spector producing the Let It Be album - McCartney hated the end product and that was the final part that ended the Beatles.

Is that correct? That black musicians would not collaborate with white groups in the UK? I hadn't heard that before. I thought Billy Preston was American though so, if correct, he may not have been aware if that was a political stance at the time. Or may not have agreed with it.

@@herseem The fact is that black musicians and artists did not have free access to mainstream tv shows, records charts etc. Mingling was not a possibility. When the Beatles toured USA they refused to perform if black people were made to sit in separate stands. Naturally, it was Frank Sinatra who first stood up for black people's rights in the American showbiz, refusing to have the black components of his band stay and eat in specific hotel and restaurants.

@@lilise3965 yes, I'd heard that Frank Sinatra had taken a stand although what you've described goes further than what I'd heard mentioned previously. And i knew the Beatles had refused to play to segregate crowds. And i understand about black musicians not having the same access, i was just surprised to hear that you described black musicians refusing to collaborate with white groups in the UK.

And something about the Maharishi putting the moves on Prudence, which was why she wouldn’t come out to play....or so the story goes

@@RockHardRiffs No, it was not Prudence. The rumour was that it was an American woman called Pam. However, there is some evidence the rumour about the Maharishi is not true - as Alex, a hanger on of John Lennon, spread the rumour to get John away from the Maharishi.

@@dannyvine3605 interesting

But the Maharishi and Ravi Shankar were vehemently against using drugs- especially LSD.

Syd Barrett

Wrong era. Say what you want about the Boomers, but these people were very grown up for their age, nearly all of them worked summer jobs starting at 13 or 14 and most lived on their own and were married with children by their early 20s. This doesn't mean they were any better or worse than any other generation, its just that the 1960s was the apex of the postwar liberal order and welfare state; college was low cost and owning a house was a dream even lower middle class people could hope to achieve. They were afforded a world that came under attack almost immediately by conservatives who detested a "nanny state" and thought their Ayn Rand fantasy of libertarian independence would create a truly great world. Unfortunately many od these same Boomers who lived to benefit from rhis generous state suddenly resented it when the next generation began to take advantage of it and turned towards their new savior, Reagan. The cointry has yet to recover bc wekeep returning yo a revised version of an anti welfare state. Resentment will always be a powerful motivator in politics. I'm happy to see people be given some help from the state even if I'm blessed enough to not need it. Because I grew up adjacent to areas that did not have thr same luck as Me. But others feel resentment when viewing the same situation. Meanwhile thjs resentment leads people to vote in politicians who further fuel abd normalize this resentment while putting in policies that hurt the very people who voted them in. Nowhere is thks more evident then the deep south, where racial resentment has allowed to GOP a stranglehold on politics, leading states like Mississippi to have Elizabethan style poverty and maternal death rates on par wkth Afghanistan. The poor white people who vote these people in are hurt nearly as much but your social status is based on those around you, so as long as you're doknt better than "them". ⁶A famous politician from thr Soutb had a quote where he told a fellow pol "these people don't care jf they have paved roads, schools worth a damn, or a hospital to treat basic infections, as long as they know they're doing better than the n!@@#$ across town, abd that they ain't getting a penny. " Ultimately the acceptance of that attitude by the Boomers throughout the US has led to the situation we're in now where they were largely responsible for the entire Trump phenomenon and it won't be until this conflicted generation passes from the scene that the newer Generations will be able to move out from under their shadow. My mother, who is a boomer, once said to me "you know, we lit a match and blew up the world in the 60s which provoked a massive massive reaction in politics that took us back 60 years in response. It took us 30 years and two new generations of Americans to finally decide the Mad Max world of the Reagan 80s was not benefiting anybody just as we were putting the pieces back together and finally getting somewhere constructive, our generation decided to become old, scared, and racist and did it all over again and voted this clown in in 2016. I think it's time that we remove ourselves from the scene and let someone else have a say for once. we become awful haughty" So lazy and living off their parents? That's simply was not the case for the hippies or any other part of that generation nearly all of them lived on their own by the time they were 18. What they were guilty though of is forgetting their roots and forgetting how they were able to accomplish those very things and taking away the ability of future generations to do the same. And that's why children are living with their Boomer parents until they're 30 because of the world the Boomers themselves created so I do not feel bad for them I feel bad for the kids

I really enjoyed reading this. Thank you

Goofy AF!

What if you defeat Nazis, is that a shame?

Rothschild family (federal reserve board/bank of England) started world war I and in 1917 made an agreement to start world war ii. This same bank burned down the white house in the war of 1812. We lost that war and Andrew Jackson won it back 20 years later. Israel attacked the USS Liberty in 1967 killing many sailors and america did not retaliate - I would have been proud to fight against Israel for attacking us but we did not defend ourselves but work for the Rothschild bank.

"Dissolved"? Boy do you read that wrong. The principles grew and spread and changed the world.

She does not seem at all materialistic to me!

I'm Prudence Ann

Interesting and funny thought.

Get back.

@@dukeemzworth3005 Good one!