Vlad's Twitter thread: x.com/VladVexler/status/17559... Vlad's main channel / vladvexler Support Vlad's work on Patreon! / vladvexler Support Vlad via PayPal www.paypal.com/paypalme/vladv...
Vlad's Twitter thread: x.com/VladVexler/status/1755932312246632656?s=20 Vlad's main channel ru-vid.comvideos Support Vlad's work on Patreon! www.patreon.com/vladvexler Support Vlad via PayPal www.paypal.com/paypalme/vladvexler?country.x=GB&locale.x=en_GB
I truly believe now what General SVR since October is claiming...that Putin died by the end of October. The interview yesterday was a cumulus of nonsense and lies. It is indeed a double and the real one would never agree to that kind of interview. 100%.
Hey Vlad, you have 5000 videos sucking on war and "Russia bad" topics, but nothing on dementia ruled opposite side of things and Europe. Makes me think you're another biased blogger funded by those you don't talk about. Can you please prove the opposite and post something on that matter? Thanks!
You haven't waych his videos to write this comment. He's telling truths and you can t handle it. The problem is not with russians per say but with leadership. Citizens should have risen before to prevent this but now it's too late and they're stuck imo@@old-schematic
"I could have made this speech 10x more destructive." I believe it, and am glad that our most competent ally in this struggle is their sheer incompetence.
@@AstroGremlinAmerican Maybe because he is not as bad as the establishment media makes him out to be. Russia SHOULD take back Ukraine because Ukraine is a NAZI STATE
Whilst I believe this is true and I did find it odd that he didn't go in deeper when given many open goals by Tucker I do wonder if this is by design. Putin isn't stupid, though I don't think he's a mastermind strategist either, but at the moment the US by not passing military aid bills for Ukraine (which ironically is actually giving them older munitions whilst the money actually goes on updating America's arsenal and keeps American companies doing well) is doing exactly what he wants and if he has gone in hard on the US he might have convinced me Americans that this needs to change. He already has his lackeys in the Republican Party and Trump saying everything he wants to hear so why risk any of this when he knows if aid doesn't come Russia will take more and more of Ukraine. It's very sad to see what is happening in the US happening and even though I found this interview very odd just having it happen I think he sees as a win for him.
To call it an interview is a bit of a stretch to start with. This was just an opportunity to release the bots and trolls on all comment boxes of all social media platforms around the world
Yeah ,but now we know for sure that putin is raving ...so often people think there is a rationale behind his beliefs somewhere but now we know .. all those that cry out for negotiations will reLise ,you can't negotiate with someone who isn't present to himself ,let alone anyone else !
Yeah, I myself subscribed to the British (Russell Brand turned Ruzzian Brand) and Indian (Amit Sengupta, but this one stepped back some time ago and didn't cover several months). Bots under their posts are multiplying so fast, just like bacteria in the lab 🤢
So people ARE aware most interactions with people that have a positive opinion of russia and their warmongering are fake? Comments like yours need to be TOP comment all the time because the people who don't know are exactly the ones who get influenced by bots. Go to CNN, Fox, DW or any other news channel. You will get downvoted, your comment gets deleted, yet somehow you will still get tons of notifications of bots that simp for Putin. Worst thing is that it's facilitated by platforms in the west. On the one hand they want to engage with comments; on the other hand they don't do enough to counter disinformation.
Since the beginning of the war, there was a well-known meme where Lukashenko tried to show everyone a map where Ukraine was preparing an attack, but mister Pu overmeme him by passing to an freeze Karlson a folder with Khmelnytskyi's letters.😂😂😂
His part about Poland in WW2 was very interesting, he said Poland did not compromise with Hitler over Danzig and therefore he had no choice but to invade Poland. Not only does this demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding of WW2, and also undermines his view of "might makes right" and moral indifference, he basically says Hitler was right/didn't do anything wrong. Which is not what I expected from this to say the least.
He apparently hates Natzis but somehow loves and admires then too - it is weird. Basically he would have loved them if they didn't happen to be German rather than Russian I think!! 🤔 Basically the only problerm with them is that they were German
@@skywillfindyou After 23years of putin i think we have an absolute certainty about the russian system under him now and your one of the nobodies that prop him up like the good little Zombie that you are..
Yeah I agree that it was surprisingly poor! He really felt like a sad old man rather than a powerful super intelligent 4d chess player. It’s a tragedy that so many have died rather than a few relatives getting annoyed over a cantankerous Christmas dinner - “yeah grandad, we get it the West is being super unfair on you 😂”. There’s too many old confused people hanging on in politics these days. Of course Putin has no choice… I can’t remember if it was this channel said that being a dictator is like holding onto the ears of a wolf, the only thing worse than continuing to hold on is letting go.
@@pindapoy1596But what does Avdiivka have to do with Tucker and Putin being unhinged? Russians may as well march to Kyiv - it will just prove my point...
@@andyhx2 The unhinged guy is winning. Is he therefore that unhinged meaning "irrational" or "acting crazy"? Results and achievements is what counts on the battlefield.
The fact that you can summarize a 2-hour interview so quickly and effectively might reflect the emptiness of Carlson and Putin. Putin pulling out specific dates is just hilarious!
Corrupt is rather common for politician, so it's like nothing said here. Head of mafia just show how ridiculously deep did you sink into media propaganda.
My mother just watched this interview and was fawning over how intelligent she thought Putin was. I thank you for your input, I send your video to my mother.
To be honest...he may be intelligent. He has enough time to educate himself. The thing is: You can be intelligent and at the same time evil. And that's the problem. He also may be charismatic for some people. And the ancient Greeks with their democracy said once: Be aware of the charismatic! It's true. Be aware.
I am an American. I am not sure what an average American is, but I don’t think most Americans are even aware that this interview took place, nor do they care.
The average MAGA just keeps droning on and on about how NATO is costing them money. They are pretty stupid and lack any insight into economics or Geopolitics.
What frightens me as an American is that the US is the largest producer of Oil and LNG but we fight the Middle East so Europe can have cheap oil prices. What frightens me is EUROPE has started two world wars and literally dragged America into both just so 80 years later cry baby Europeans can call Americans war mongers! 8 of the top 10 Universities in the world are in the US. We're not dumb we just don't give a shit about Europe
The average American has an attention span related to the length of a tik tok video so you have nothing to fear from the interview. What you do need to be concerned about is the degree to which the right-wing mediasphere controls our discourse and the Democratic party can't produce a better candidate than Biden. Any American is going to have fathers or brothers who served in Europe and grandfathers and great-grandfathers who fought there. The possibility of the US abandoning Europe like after 1918 is remote in the extreme despite Putin's blather and Trump or not.
Could explain, your highness Fuhrer Why you feel the need to invade Poland and burn the Jewish people? Thank you, now i understand your point of vieux. They had it coming!
I personally see Tucker as a grifter, like Solovyov; he is fully aware that everything he says on TV and social media is B.S. and is just in it for the money.
I don't see why interviewing Hitler would have been a bad thing. Journalists are supposed to seek out the viewpoints of different folk. Yes it was reeking of propaganda but I'm happy it exists. When making decisions, one should see and hear as much information as possible. Just because you listened to what someone has to say, doesn't mean you agree with all, or indeed any of it. In fact, if you want good life advice, you'll often learn a lot more about yourself or the subject, when reading a book you dont agree with. Consuming only material we already agree with is precisely what leads to the polarized echo chamber modern social media and politics is.
But you have to remember who his intended audience was... the American Maga types.. he waffled so innocently that he was making it look like all he wanted was a tea-party in Ukraine by the gentle giant Russia..and to save them from the oppressive Nazi state in which no one has any rights and don't understand that they are really Russian... ...and on the day it was announced that the opposition candidate would not allowed to run against Putin in the election in Russia... 😂 So much for defending freedom.and rights huh..😊 But Tucker's audience will have swallowed everything Putin said hook line and sinker...
To be honest, I find it insanely hilarious that Tucker desperately tried to placate to Putin with his questions but Putin's view is so unhinged that he made him look bad anyway.
It's more than just groveling by Carlson. Another poster commented that this gave Putin an opportunity to vent to Western audiences and Carlson a chance to play an important person. Here we are talking about Carlson like he's something other than a racist hack and Putin like he's not a murderer with something useful to say. You see what I mean?
putin hasnt said anything he hasnt said 100 times before, and tucker was too afraid or too uninformed to actually argue any of the talking pooints. overall, a waste of two hours. if you havent seen it yet, dont bother.
Ah, yes. Take your word for it random internet stranger. Completely defeating the point and further adding to the ignorance that western media wants to keep the peasants in. Bravo, sir. You're a shill and sheep. Follow the flock over the cliff.
Tucker: "Why did you invade Ukraine?" putin: "In the beginning, God created the Earth...." The interview was comedy gold. putin's lack of self-awareness was stunning.
If he is so easily tricked by western politicians; are you the right leader of your country? If he is so obsessed with history; why does he not try a debate with Snyder or Plokhy?
I didn't watch the interview myself, because... c'mon! But I've read Putin blamed Poland for ww2. What did he say, why? Was Poland wearing a miniskirt?
@@moonasha Charles de Gaulle said similar, that it was only himself that liberated France and placed France among the victors of World War II. As for Putin, I guess the Soviets reneging on their repayment of US Lend-Lease after WWII means it never existed. To all those who served on the Artic convoys, shame on Putin.
well the people who support him was saying the Ukraine invasion is a "Western propaganda", then they said that it will be fast bloodless conflict where they restore order in Ukraine, then they say that Putin actually never planned to take over Kyiv, so...
It is a bit scary though, because Hitler also “rambled” a lot of nonsense before WW2, including in his book. People dismissed it, but then he tried to implement even the most nonsensical of his ideas, multiplying them by a thousand. When reading The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, it was incredible to me how much of what Hitler did he foreshadowed, but the world didn't respond it adequately, because they didn't expect that he was actually for real.
Vlad Vexler provides a calm leadership in his measured conversation style, that leads responders to be measured in comments and not devolve into shouting matches.
@@VladVexlerChatyou do your part in the best way that it can be done. I still wouldn’t call it failing, since we have no true control over other people. Also keep in mind that some will have a reasoning or reaction that will be inappropriate, whatever the approach is being used.
@@VladVexlerChat Leadership: doing YT channels with high quality content. that you do. Authenticity: doing it with the acknowledgement that we are all human (you said "I fail", which is that acknowledgment). These two together, sharing competence with humility amount to TRUE and GENUINE Leadership. You make a huge contribution! Thank you!
It was a NASCAR car crash. One of the is botched interviews I’ve ever seen. At least watch him fetishize dates and events of history. And look at the look on Tucker’s face. He’s holding in laughing at Putin.
Like a schoolyard bully, Putin lectured Carlson about how 'mistreating' Russia is 'self-destructive,' one of those classic, "Why are you punching yourself?" the bully asks while punching. I also noticed the Trumpian hand gestures and movements. What a strange fantasy world he lives in.
His world is not fantasy he just knows more then public is aware off.Back channel negotiation are ongoing between Russia and USA at least since Vilnius summit of NATO none of it is public so far
I'm mildly masochistic in other circumstances but I'm not enough of a pervert to enjoy even the thought of sitting through that shitshow. So thank you for watching the interview and giving us this summary. I'm glad you had a laugh about parts of it. I'd worry for your mental health if that weren't the case.
My subjective take- Russo-victimization is utterly fascinating to me. I've had conversations with Russian citizens, and certain parts of the citizenry are just completely under the spell of this victim mindset. It always ties back to the World Wars and the horrible things that happened to the Russo-citizens of the time period. I agree what happened in Russia was horrific, but we are now generations away from the wars and the need to feel victimized in certain parts of the modern day population is bizarre. Sometimes, it appears to me that Russia is one of the very few countries that never really started moving forward after the wars ended. Maybe some Russians are still fighting those wars.
As a Russian myself, I agree. I used to have the same type of thinking, but I was able to look critically into it. But I see this attitude around me and it bothers me a lot. It’s a huge problem and the core for other problems
Right, you should never check sources yourself, let others explain everything to you, or you risk to develop opinions that will conflict with current narative.
I don't think Putin reached anyone in Tucker's audience. The vast majority of Twitter followers can't absorb a message of over 140 characters. A half hour lecture on Russian history. Oh please. Most of Trump's followers couldn't sit thru of half hour of American history.
Wrong, and in this Putin is correct, the western world leadership has undermined the wealth and freedom of its own people and have embraced war. Have refused to sit at the negotiation table, after the west created the war themselves by failing to adhere to agreements they themselves concocted.
So many Maga people were really looking forward to the interview to finally get the "truth" and confirm their long held suspicions. My guess is that these same people with be left feeling unsatisfied. They are very quiet after this "most Important interview ever" turned out to be the opposite. Soon to be forgotten
"There’s no point in debating with delusional people" Your mileage varies. When the delusional person has nuclear weapons the "point" is to find out when, where and why he would use them. If you simply decide he's the enemy, well, he appears to have decided YOU are and then it's war.
evil Vlad Vexler be like "hello ugly community, today I am going to explain how to destroy our democratic institutions by tethering them to the practiced vice of untruthfulness"
@jessehachey2732 I can sense bitterness. No, if his content is of great intellectual, he would be interviewing putin instead of carlson tucker. What he's adhering to pertains to women gossiping. He'll make the goons bored that throwing him off the window wouldn't be entertaining.
Reductio ad absurdam: As the Denisovans were the very first occupants of Russia: should we now move all of today's Russians out in favour of those with the most left-over Denisovan DNA even in current times!?
And don't forget about how Kaliningrad is actually Königsberg and belongs to Germany. No wait, before Prussia got Germanized by the Teutonic knights, the Prussians were a baltic speaking people. So Kalinigrad actually belongs to Lithuania! And don't forget about the Neanderthals that lived there before the Baltics. What about the Neanderthals?
This is one of the best videos I've seen in this channel. So much that if you would be so kind of providing a transcript, I'm willing to make proper subtitles for this video in both English and Spanish. Best regards from Argentina :)
Whether he is smart or not, Carlson's signature move is to just stare back with a dumbfounded look when someone he is interviewing says something incredibly stupid and illogical. My guess is that he was hoping to hit paydirt, but just ended up going over a played out stretch of old tailings.
Thank You Vlad! As a Latvian, it did get me nervous when he mentioned Latvia. Putin lies when he opens his mouth so singling out Latvia and Poland did seem worrisome.
Poland and Baltic states should unite in order to make him tweak. For some reasons Russians still fear Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth. It's been centuries since Poland was a superpower but Putin still thinks we matter a lot smh
As for now, he doesn´t "have an interest" in your country, but you as well as a finn like me knows that could be a very different story if he succeeds in Ukraine.
You'd rather watch this guy wearing his overweight aunt's sweater. He feeds all your preconceived notions. Putin forces you to think which hurts the two brain cells in your head bumping together
I'm glad I wasn't the only one laughing First he lays out the thousand year history of the country he's claiming doesn't exist Then claims the West was mean to him. Which led to the best line of the night, when Tucker responded with an actually insightful "You're obviously bitter about it..." 😅 to which an I'm sure annoyed Putin had to say "no no no" Another doozy was him sympathizing with Hitler over Poland stubbornly refusing to be conquered by him even when he asked nicely. So Hitler had to invade 🤷♂️ Kinda like Putin and Ukraine? Smh And the topping on the cake were the two 5 minute infomercials for China lololol
This playbook is revealed in the book "Utopia" by Thomas More. They claim to abhor war, including a list of reasons for going to war, some seem noble; to help a friendly nation, but it includes "to get that thing which the neighbor refused to give" or (page 83) "for they account it a very just cause of war for a nation to hinder others from possessing a part of that soil of which they make no use," in other words, if I can make better use of your land, than you are making of your land, I will take it. basilica.ca/documents/2016/10/Thomas%20More-Utopia.pdf
In fairness, Putin asked Tucker if he wants serious conversation or a talk show. Serious talk requires serious analysis so a lot of information was being presented which is always a good thing. If Tucker wanted a talk show, Putin could have presented short answers that he knew would be popular amongst audience. But that would neither bring anyone closer to understanding the current situation, nor it would be Presidential of him. Putin presented part of what type of knowledge is required for being considered a serious global political figure. - The first part is the history of Russia. You maybe wish he was talking about the history of the state of Ukraine, but that one did not exist and is country of recent history. He basically painted a picture that most of Ukrainians are Russian in origin. - Russia won WWII, it was only natural for it to be included into global security instead of being targeted by NATO. With refusals of NATO to include Russia, Russia is in the right to conclude that NATO is anti Russian block. It is obvious. - it is not sympathizing with Hitler, it is analyzing Hitler's way of thinking towards Poland back in the day. Russia was only sympathizing with Checkoslovakia being attacked by Hitler and Poland and that was one of the reasons why Russia also attacked Poland when Hitler did. - what is untrue in what Putin said about China? Finally, is there anything untrue in anything Putin said?
@@js4182 World ;Wars 1 and 2 drew lines on a map often with little regard of who lives there. But a *natural* border exists, the Dnieper river. East of it is strongly Russian, around 90 percent ethnic Russian. West of it is European and slavs. That would be a natural division BUT it splits Kiev.
I think this a great observation, that it could've been made so much "better" and more destructive. And I think that's revealing in itself, as it indicates that Putin is winging it in semi-isolation. Yes, he prepares, but he doesn't prepare as head of a great influence operation with great advisers.
Very true, imagine if an educator such as a "dark" Vlad had been there to coach Putin! Also Putin completely misunderstood Carlson's audience, eg, if the audience is shallow UN world order etc wouldnt be interested in RuZZian history at all.
The irony of all this is that, Tucker, a promoter of free speech, interviewing someone who despises it to pass on his message to the other people that promote it.
@@josephsmith106 gee, why would someone not want to watch an interview with a grifter, and a guy who poisons journalists with polonium. Gee, can't think of any reasons
Putin is a joke 😂😂😂 He said he wasn't going to invade Ukraine but he did. 😂😂😂 Latvia and the rest should better beef up their defence and deterrent measures
@@thomasmaughan4798 Effectively that’s all he’s got. If he didn’t have nukes, western intervention would have been overwhelming and this war would have ended in Moscow long ago. Then the Russian people could have had their Nazi germany moment and moved on to become a peaceful, prosperous, respected nation.
@@marymarlow3646 "western intervention would have been overwhelming and this war would have ended in Moscow long ago." Likely so. "moved on to become a peaceful, prosperous, respected nation." Russia was rapidly becoming exactly that up to a couple of years ago. I very much wanted the awesome Russian TX-500 radio from Lab 599 but they could not manufacture enough of them for the demand. Astronauts reached the ISS (International space station) on Russian rockets.
I think the part where Putin went on to defend the Nazis invasion of Poland, or at least justify it is worth it alone as it shows how bullshit the claims of this war being about “denazification” is.
Thanks Vlad, I don't think I could have sat through three hours of Putin and Tucker Carlson. Why am I not surprised that an interview with Putin turned into a lecture?
Apparently he likes to lecture Americans on his version of history. Every phone call he had with Obama started with a 45 minute history lecture , according to aides, since he thinks every Western leader is stupid. It seems obvious to me he’s the dumb one .
Well said. I watched it. It was interesting. But yeah...a great lecture. There were no really tough questions for Putin. But there would have been some. 😅 Like: "You are talking about the war with the word "war". Many other of your people are sitting in jail or maybe siberia because they used the same language and words just like you! Why?" Or his 'not so beloved political partner' who then got poisoned...Tucker could had mentioned it. But he didn't. But of course I understand him...maybe overwhelmed by the Kreml.... it's not a good place maybe to ask tough questions. 😂
Hi Vlad, thank you. Your forensic analysis with intuitive professional input always gives clarity, allowing us to see behind the haze of delusional narcissism. Great posts
Haha same thing happened to me Vlad, I started watching the interview and about 15 minutes in, I just had to laugh out loud. FIrst of all at the utter incompetence of Putin to start with a 30 minute history lecture on stuff no Western listener cares about, but then also at the absolute pathetic whining that was present in every sentence. The mind of a child, trapped in the body of an ultra rich and powerful czar. And then Tucker's look whenever he was shown. Isn't he aware that his "I'm listening to every word intensely"-look could be a cave man parody instead? What a bizarre disaster.
I started laughing 3 minutes in, when he mentioned "Prince Rurik". For one, no American or Western viewer will be able to stand that, and two - the disconnect between the question and the answer was hilarious at that point. He could only be funnier if he decided to do some ball-juggling as his answer. Possibly, with invisible balls 😄.
I watched the interview and found it very enlightening. It's not that I found Putin sympathetic, but we learned a great deal about what motivates him. Overall, I would say that Tucker has done us a great service... something that the corporate media has utterly failed to do. Thank you Vlad. Love your content. Please consider doing a piece on the accuracy of the history lecture that Putin did.
As Carlson mentioned before the interview part of the video, the history part of the interview was to provide the context and timeline of what did happen. It would really be great to get an accuracy check, because Vlad did say, the dates mentioned by Putin are wrong. In what way are they wrong?
Mind you, Putin advertised what he wants you to think to be his thoughts on the matter. ( At best assume these to be political motivated, his chess game.) Putin will never disclose his true toughts.
@@wouterke9871 I got two big "takeaways" from the interview, if you'll allow me a crude analogy. 1. Putin is like the abusive husband who beat his wife half to death and then blames it on his wife, saying, "see what you made me do". 2. He accuses the US and more specifically the CIA of all sorts of nefarious activities, including manipulation, coercion, election interference, and coup d'etat, which I'm sure is likely true. What he failed to mention is that Russia does exactly the same things. As an American, I view these kinds of activities to be as Russian as vodka! Putin comes off as a man who's upset because he's losing at a game which he considers himself to be a world champion of. So... he's tossing the whole chess board on the floor, saying, see what you made me do? It would be laughable if it weren't so tragic.
One look at your thumbnail and I'm not surprised. Also you used the word "bare" incorrectly. It's "bear" just to let you know. Remember darling, you are useless.
"Thank you for watching the interview so I didn't have to" if you want to know what the interview was about just watch the interview, this is one persons summary and opinion and your not actually going to get a full picture of the interview
He came across as someone that firmly believes his own lies which makes him so dangerous. Sadly looking at some of the comments on here and a huge amount of comments on other videos a lot of people are unable to see through it and are more than happy to forgive his past commentary that proved to be demonstrably false. We wont be invading Ukraine for example......
Thank you for carrying and helping through this issue, I feel a lot more clear and calm now. And can't wait to see the main channel video of course, lots of love and feel better Vlad
Thanks Vlad! It definitely seemed like Putin was rambling in the first half hour, although that might have been because the interpreter was having a tough time 😂.
I had the same thoughts you did while watching it. Putin went extremely easy on Western audiences, for whatever reason. I've seen a lot of his speeches and usually he's foaming at the mouth about the corruption in the West and so on. This time, he was more like a jilted lover, "well, you made some mistakes, really the most mistakes, I really just tried to make you happy, but whatever, let's call it a day and move on." It was like tried to give the impression that he was the bigger man and didn't find it necessary to list all his grievances.
The interview had several goals, a brief retelling of events from Russia’s side, even for those who are not at all aware of the events, and the humanization of the figure of Putin himself, who was demonized in the Western media. I think these parts were done well, although overall the interview is quite average, taking into account my obvious pro-Russian position.
@@user-nl6zv6hz6xCurious where your 'Pro RU' position comes from? Tbh the interview nearly bored me to sleep, this Putin seems to be quite a step down from previous. Is he just this clueless now? I doubt even Tuckers audience could feign interest at his ramblings for more than a few minutes. Curious to hear your take
