If you get a call like this are you first going to pull out your pen and paper and notes and investigate this? No. That’s why they didn’t shoot upon arrival. They gave time for the situation to reveal itself. Use some common sense. If they do sit around investigating before they arrive someone could die. The cops did the right thing in this situation.
After Columbine, police SOP to active shooter situations have changed. Presently, if a call comes about hostage or active shooter situation, SOP call for respond first, investigate later to minimize casualty. That is why if you look at the Allen mall shooting incident or the Nashville school incident, you will see that first responding police units do not stop to give aid to the injured - they rush to the active shooter.
@@arghyachatterjee3008 Two cops can show up and see if the threat is true first. Not an entire police force. Especially, when there is only one person calling after shots were supposedly fired. I see many more lawsuits in the future for law enforcement if this policy doesn’t change. The Constitution matters.
@@quill6211 It depends on how many officers are responding. I don't thing these were SWAT teams. These were regular cops responding. If you watch the body camera of Allen Mall and Nashville school shooting, there were between two and four responders.
RU-vid has a horrible problem with Nickalina 777 calling in false swatting call, she does it all the time and no one does anything about it when we report her 🤬
Soooo... SWATing happens when you call 911 and say someone has a bomb and guns etc. at a residence and then the response is to send big bearded men in tactical police gear to the house that's the subject of the call? Then is it okay then if I SWAT myself? For reasons?
Don't need one in this situation. On the plus side, even if they found something incriminating in the house, if it was unrelated to the call and there was no warrant, it could not be used in any prosecution since it was unlawfully obtained.
@@arghyachatterjee3008 There was no “ probable cause” because no cop witnessed a crime. My advice to you would be… Don’t try and cite statutes when you have no clue what you’re talking about because it makes you look foolish.
Indicia of reliability: “Signs, indications, or circumstances that point to the existence of a certain fact as being probable.” The cops had none of it. They violated this family Rights on a made up 911 call.
