When he says "the only person that can cause you to get a bad result in stocks is yourself", so many people will say to themselves "how the hell is it my fault when the stocks fall?", he means that we need to practice patience and constant study and learn.
With markets tumbling, inflation soaring, the Fed imposing large interest-rate hike, while treasury yields are rising rapidly-which means more red ink for portfolios this quarter. How can I profit from the current volatile market, I'm still at a crossroads deciding if to liquidate my $275k bond/stock portfolio
I merely looked her up on Google and was highly impressed by her credentials; I got in touch with her because I need all the help I can get. Thanks for sharing!!
Nah, holding good-quality companies will do fine over time and stay invested no matter the macro environment. Bond hasn't done well since 2021 because rate goes up, value of the bond goes down.
He means wait. when the stocks are going up it has to dip at some point you dont know how big the dip is or when it will fix its self but as it goes down 1st day end of day buy may have second dip. buy second dip day as there is only one sertainty the market will always go up he said so buying an up is wrong take the suffering in dip or get good at rope a dope.
A crash and bullish market provides equal high-yield potential, it's all about information and strategy application, I've seen folks make huge 7figure profit in a crashing market and pull it off much easily in a bull market Unequivocally the crash/recession is getting somebody somewhere rich.
Ahmed Khader not with 100$, commissions would eat up your capital if you buy individual stocks. Find a broker with 0 commission on funds and buy monthly
Panagiotis Tamvakeras If you still think commission will eat you up, you dont deserve to be rich. There are so many platform out there that offers free commission on stock purchases ie Robinhood. Stop making excuses and find a solution. This is the information age after all.
Get the Economist Subscription for only $12 for 12 weeks! You get both a digital and hard copy! subscription.economist.com/OA/EXP/UB-Student-Campaign/UB12
not sure about this, JCpenny, Hertz intelsat... did not come back up.. he even sold GE and right now... not sure if GE will even make it. But the Chinese owned stocks seems like doing fine...
@@ThahnG413 I think that is a valid point. But still, at some point, you need at least the option to take money out - if you want to buy a product, a house, or something else. Even Warren holds a lot of cash I hear, he got the cash from selling something? (Cash is trash according to Dalio..).
@@martina5328 I wouldn't take stock money out to buy a house unless it was a house I was renting out because you'd be better off slowly paying it off and getting percent gains from stocks
Still...I dunno how Warren buys his stocks when they are down. How many companies and how much he put down on each of them? What is his magic formula???
Funfact, Although Mr. Buffett has accumulated a vast amount of wealth he still lives in a modest single family home that bought for $31,500 in 1958 or about $250,000 in today's dollars.
Unfortuantely property prices are so inflated where I live that nobody could buy a decent house for less than around £800,000 - which is well beyond what a salary can deliver.
He is fooling you. He buys companies, not stocks. Buying stocks is speculation. Buying companies based on the principles of simple accounting is his approach.
Buffet was cash heavy in 2008 and sachs turned to buffet and had to offer a great deal and high interest plus dividend to buffet everyone was stuck in the markets buffet was cadh heavy and Berkshire is still cash heavy. Sachs needed the help anf warren was unsure do to the last banker deal with Solomon.
It is foolish to drive a vehicle as there is some risked posed of a drunk driver ending your life. The idea that you won't die is speculation. I know of plenty of day and swing traders who have consistently made money over 10+ years.
I think he just looks at whether it's a good business or not and then if he likes it he buys it doesn't really care goes in on good businesses and he like sits around weights
Warren is a long term investor. His model is simple really. It's not geared towards buying and selling to get fast cash. It looks more like this --> Coca-Cola $45.00/share buy 100 shares. Price drops to $44.00/share over the course of 3 months buy 100 more shares. Price rises to $46.00 over the course of a month buy 50 more shares. HOLD HOLD HOLD and keep buying more shares as time goes on averaging down if necessary and averaging up slightly when the price increases. As he keeps doing this his position(number of shares he owns) keeps increasing and any money he makes he puts a portion towards buying more Coca-Cola shares. Over the next 70 years his position will look something like 500,000 shares and the price of Coca-Cola will be around $250/share his profit will be enormous. He's a holder and because he has a ton of money he can buy millions of shares at once. For people like you and me we would need our whole lifetime to crack a few hundred thousand in profits. Which if we teach our kids to do the same thing and not squander it they should be able to make a few million in their lifetimes. They teach their kids and now the real money starts flowing because the more money you have the more money you can make.
By YouSum Live 00:00:00 Uncertainty in predicting market movements. 00:00:19 Long-term belief in stock value appreciation. 00:00:42 Favorable view of stock price declines. 00:00:45 Consistent stock buying behavior since youth. 00:01:10 Historical perspective on American business success. 00:01:39 Self-inflicted errors as primary stock risk. 00:01:57 Continuous stock purchasing, especially during declines. By YouSum Live
Off course he feels better when stocks go down, they are cheaper for hugh investors like himself that have unlimited capital to grab stocks for a song. The smaller investors take a hugh hit. At least the man wants to pay his taxes !
Anthony Ahearn Maybe you take a huge hit because you don't know what you are doing. Everyone I know have done fine with investments. I'm a small average investor and feel better when stocks go down as well. That's why my 401k is over 1.4 million and Roth IRA is $800k. Interest,dividends,and compounding along with contributing does wonders. Just this week alone my Oneok and a couple of REITs paid out over $6k in reinvested dividends.
Only reason he looks at the stock market is because he wants to see if some idiot made a dive and somebody made a dive he likes to get it in on it like a hawk seeing that they make some money off maybe a 30% or 40% death other than that he doesn't even really care about the market at all he just purchases businesses that he likes then weights
When you’re worth $80 billion I guess it’s OK when stocks go down. If you’re someone that’s depending upon your retirement portfolio to live and the market goes down big time it’s not such a good thing Warren. By the way Warren do you really need to be worth $80 billion? Why not give away 40 billion and feed and house people in this country that go to bed hungry every night without a roof over their head. I’m sure you could get by on a measly $40 billion.
I see exactly what you are saying, but 80 billion in net worth is not the same as having 80 billion in cash. Most of that 80 billion is hard at work making more money while simultaneously paying workers wages. If he were to give away 40 billion of his worth it would no doubt help many people but it would also cost many workers their jobs.
Warren Buffett is giving away 90% of his wealth when he dies. He and Bill Gates have teamed up to channel their wealth for charity. By the way, the market goes up over a persons life time. If a person invests in stable dividend paying stocks they won't be bothered by market corrections because their wealth will still be worth so much more than if they had not have invested it. Not to mention the huge buying opportunities that become available during a large correction that they can apply their dividend cash towards and income savings.
Chad Gammon You did not get my point. I never said he’s not a philanthropist. My point is do you really need $80 billion? I know you’re simpleminded but try to grasp the point.
