Hartford Schroeder was handed a Princess Title on a silver platter all willy nilly. CA sends her photo to BP, announcing. here's Lilly. Bio-Mom Stassi admits she let's MM use Hartford to portray Lilly. Screenshots Taken of All
They cannot be in the LOS, as the child must be 'born of the body', not rented or even surrogate. Hazard himself needs to be removed though. MM desperately wants to be queen which is only possible if Haz is king. Her extreme ambition makes me afraid for the Wales' safety.
Why gave they not been? I do not think in a constitutional monarchy, the government and the palace courtiers are less astute than we Royal Roguies. Everything has looked "off" since the sliding baby bump(s) of the first "pregnancy". And what's up w/ the hysterectomy stories? It just seems odd that if HALF of this weirdness around the Sussex children is even HALF true, that there has been nothing coming from palace or gov't officials. Instead, the two children are given Prince and Princess titles. The British secret service surely knows whatever there is to know. The public may never know the whole story......but I surely am VERY curious. 😕😮
@@oldtiredm53The children weren't 'given' anything it was automatic according to the law. Do you really think that our Royal Family, our Government and all our security officials together are not as bright as posters on social media?
@@farmgirl6866 I have been watching Vanderpump for 11 years. I’m very familiar with Stassi and Beau. That is NOT their baby. But I’m sure Stassi is flattered.
Why did the royals say they have never met Archie? Why would a professional photographer not set his time correctly on his camera? Why would there be a hold on this photo? Too many questions....
@Bluebougainvillea Tyler Perry has said "I have not met Lili, no one has met Lili". You would think her "godfather" at least would have met her. Archie probably belongs to Just Sparry, he certainly isn't hers bc I watched the Archie moonbump drop to her knees
Could someone please tell me if there was a 2nd South Park episode (even if they were the topic for a shorter time). I have looked everywhere and I can not find anything more than the 2023 "World Privacy Tour". Any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated. - Much Love & Cheers NYC
Allegedly Catherine arrived in a car in a blue dress for that Christening photo but within a few minutes is in a pink dress sitting down in the picture.
Doll. Moves when pressing side of arm. Photo of the Queen and Prince Philip faked also. Queen wouldn’t wear what she was wearing in photo to greet grandchild or for a christening.
I feel that having that amount of $$$ can buy you anything. The sad thing is, these two don't know how to be discrete with their purchases. Had they brought their kids out, in a more normal fashion, none of us would be asking any questions. They are the Odd Couple in the Worst Horror Costumes of Nasty Personalities.
That picture never happened in real life. It is absolutely photoshopped imo. It is very strange how this woman allegedly gave birth in complete secrecy twice, had 2 christenings in complete secrecy, two birth certificates that are questionable of two children that nobody in the general public has ever seen.
No doctor signed off on Archie's birth the first and only time that's happened with a royal birth. The doctor Meghan claimed delivered Archie was out of the country on family holiday when he was born. Archie's birth certificate list mother as the Dutchess of Sussex with no name Harry's full name & title are listed as father. Odd indeed.
Let's get real...I'd like to know what the charade is all about...I guess she didn't want the RF to know that she had a hysterectomy and therefore could not produce any royal children with Hazzy...😮
Spencer ladies were raised as aristocrats and have been around RF all their lives. Lady Jane would never attend a royal event in casual clothes and Panama hat
@@janefairless7410 If she had some secateurs handy she could prune a few roses in that hat. There are multiple pictures of her wearing some very stylish hats.
A different child every pic, or the same really old ones. The hair colour goes from brown, red, to blonde for the boy. Hardly any pics of "lili", the same one of August in the blue suit.
Always thought it was a photoshopped picture. Princess Catherine would never have worn that colour to a Christening. The ladies usually wear white or cream, except M of course to Prince Louis’s because she wanted to stand out.
Markle stood out all right at Louis’s christening. She looked like an olive with toothpick legs. Just a tiny contrast to the pickle dress when the suggested colors were red,white,or blue.
@@mischa9587 .......she far TOO CONTROLLING to ever hire/pay anybody else to dress her - and it shows. ONLY at the very beginning of their "relationship when she was just worming her way into the R.F. did she ever look suitably attired.
Check the reflection in the mirror! The Queen was not there and said she never met Archificial! So there is that! I would take the QE11 words over Me-Again! Also why are William and Kate floating and fuzzy?
True, but the only photo I've seen with the late Queen and Archie together was the Christening photo. *The Queen wasn't anywhere near close enough to actually SEE the baby*
The Pat Tillman Award, honoring AMERICAN veteran war hero Pat Tillman, who was killed in Afghanistan, should go to a deserving AMERICAN - not to BRITISH Prince Harry! Please sign the petition "Request ESPN to Rethink Awarding the Pat Tillman Award to BRITISH Prince Harry" Only 670 signatures needed to get to 68,000 signatures! The award should be given to a deserving AMERICAN veteran! Make your voice heard! We can do this! There's strength in numbers! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
There was no christening. There is no way the Queen and Catherine would ever wear those clothes. When the Sussex Squad was berating Catherine about her photo, I asked about these photos.
Many people have noticed the photo was manipulated. just the incorrect christening dress for many of those "guests", then onto the missing chair legs, and the out of scale people . .
It's so blatantly photoshopped as to be ridiculous. Not only would Catherine be at least 7' tall, she is hovering on that chair! She is also wearing amazing shoes, with only one heel.. ... , Lady Jane is wearing a gardening hat here, but the funniest is that ' archie' has a FOOT for a hand! That bulge behind the fingers is a heel. The only other photoshopped Harkle photo is the very weird one of them with ' the children' [ a Christmas photo?] where MM has at least 7 toes.
If photo is real, I believe Princess Catherine purposely wear this outfit because when Prince Louis was christened, Meghan wore that olive outfit instead of the following the light colors the others wore 🇺🇸
Since Sidley Twins dad reviewed that picture with the "children" and pointed out all the photoshop fails the Harkles haven't put out pictures. Lol!😅😂🎉 Yay Sidley dad!❤
Princess Catherine, bless her heart. The poor woman grimaces in photos with Meghan. This portrait of the family is giving off major tension. Meghan has that effect on everyone she meets.
Sorry, you're forgetting perspective. Objects or living things closer to the camera or viewer appear larger than objects or living things further away from the camera or viewer. Even in short distances. William is behind and further away from the camera than Catherine, so she looks larger. Look at how Harry seems huge compared to his admittedly short mother in law, and the Queen looks larger than King Charles. Perspective is how the eye sees and judges distance.
Always knew that Photo of alleged Christian it was photoshopped, look at the size of Princess Catherine as well, also Queen Camilla as well as Prince William and the mirror. Not forget there was no way the Archbishop of Canterbury attended for the Ceremony he was a long way away at some other Church function he needed to be, he couldn’t possibly be in two places as the same time.
Jesus, are you saying that photo wasn't photoshopped? Hazard didn't know how old his son is 2 days or 2 weeks. Their intention is to promote artificial is for real 🤷 Unfortunately, they were caught out lying for 6yrs and, even if they told the truth, I would not believe it. The boy who cried wolf.
The date of Archie's christening was July 6 2019, but the date of the original photo of this occasion was May 8 2019???? Are Meghan and Harry able to time travel?
Take a look at tge photo when the Queen and Prince Phillip with Doria staring down at so called baby Archie. Danja Zone said immediately the Queen and Prince Phillip was cut & pasted.
Harry and Megan's faces look as if they have been through a filter. They are both so smooth and shiny without a wrinkle or a spot. Also, Harry has hair.
The first thing I noticed which I can’t take my eyes off, is the size of Catherine. She is HUGE and out of proportion to everyone else. I’m sure this photo has been manipulated. Regarding Camilla’s outfit - the decoration could easily have been “removed” using photoshop and other slight alterations made. I think it’s the same outfit.
Imo, this entire pic was photoshopped. I don't think this event ever took place. P.S. Coincidentally, I was watching Alfred Hitchcock's "Psycho" when this video popped up. I don't believe in "coincidences." Also, Hitchcock was a perfectionist and paid enormous attention to every single detail. He said that filming a movie was boring since he had already story boarded it prior. You, Jesus, have that same keen eye and perfectionism. 🧐🧐💜💜
I thought someone had pointed out that the actual clock in that room was much smaller than the one in the picture. I wonder what time was on that clock, if this allegation was true. Zara has said no one in the RF ever met Archie Harrison/Harry's son - maybe she did not include the christening as a meeting
The way the figures are grouped always made me think that they maybe intended to crop out Charles, Camilla, William and Catherine at some stage in the future, and have just the parents and baby, backed by Doria and Diana’s two sisters!!
There's no way I will ever believe this " christening pic" is authentic. The Bishop of Canterbury who was supposed to officiate the event was in another part of the country at the time of supposed "christening". Different child for the black and white "christening" photo as well.
I wonder, was there a dress color code for the ladies to wear. What would happen if Princess Catherine wore shocking pink dress instead of the pastel? Would it bother Meghan, since Meghan used to wear an outfit of a different color than the rest of the people in the picture to stand out or was it to be a rebel.
All the people beside and behind the couch were added later. You can clearly see...Harry wanted a picture with him megan and archie alone but that was not wjat the RF wanted so they were added so the pictire couldbe released to the public. This is not the Monarchy of Harry... 😂
I realise Catherine is in the front of the others, but she seems so much bigger than everyone else. I know she is tall, but her face is bigger than the others???? I think - if anything - she was photoshopped in.