"We did lose momentum" in Ukraine because of delay in Congress approving aid, Graham says  

So, in 1939, when Hitler said (just as Vladimir Putin has done), that Germany needed some 'Lebensraum', and first annexed the Sudetenland, then Czechoslovakia and Poland, you would have supported Neville Chamberlain's policy of appeasement, rather than putting English or French lives at risk? Just as Charles Lindbergh and Henry Ford in the United States advocated? Do I understand that right? It's Europe's problem, not America's, is that right?

LEAVE

​@@rickrose5377 your one sided view of history along with all that unbridled arrogance is what led many of us to start listening to them in the first place. Suppose i should thank you and say; keep up the good work buddy! 😂

@@operator9858 Well, the laughing emoji certainly seals your case. I suppose that's the last resort of people who are incapable of argument and ignorant of history. Let's be clear: I asked some questions of the OP to try to understand and clarify his point of view. He hasn't replied (probably, in part, because his position is indefensible), so you've elected to act as his surrogate. So let me ask you some questions: You referred to my "one sided [sic] view of history". Do you mean we've misunderstood Hitler and the Nazis -- that they were not so bad, and that we were wrong to oppose them? Do you nean that Neville Chamberlain's strategy of appeasement was right? Or do you mean that Vladimir Putin's criminal aggression into Ukraine is defensible, and that it's understandable that he should want to annex it. That Putin's nostalgia for the larger, more powerful empire in which he grew up is understandable, and that we are wrong to oppose him? Answer me, please, because until you do, here's what I think. I think you're an ignoramus who doesn't know what he's talking about.

@@operator9858 Well, the laughing emoji certainly seals your case. I suppose that's the last resort of people who are incapable of argument and ignorant of history. Let's be clear: I asked some questions of the OP to try to understand and clarify his point of view. He hasn't replied (probably, in part, because his position is indefensible), so you've elected to act as his surrogate. So let me ask you some questions: You referred to my "one sided [sic] view of history". Do you mean we've misunderstood Hitler and the Nazis -- that they were not so bad, and that we were wrong to oppose them? Do you nean that Neville Chamberlain's strategy of appeasement was right? Or do you mean that Vladimir Putin's criminal aggression into Ukraine is defensible, and that it's understandable that he should want to annex it. That Putin's nostalgia for the larger, more powerful empire in which he grew up is understandable, and that we are wrong to oppose him? Answer me, please, because until you do, here's what I think. I think you're an ignoramus who doesn't know what he's talking about.

Without Europe, the U.S. economy would fold, think about that.

@@richardhenry5961 No, not really. If we weren’t spending trillions to support Europe defensively, spending on climate accords, funding over half of the UN, NATO…we’d be just fine.

@@drewolm You have a very narrow perception of the world. Its called a World economy. Maybe you need to read a book on World economics.

@@richardhenry5961 No, not really. The whole globalism thing doesn’t really work. What you may be referring to is trade, that can be worked out. Europe absolutely, no doubt needs the USA for military support. A strong US leader, not the one we have now, would make sure Europe understands who’s holding the cards.

MIC is a big donar for Graham. He doesn't care about Ukraine its the money.