Awesome job Tuomi! When you wanna say the object form (in this case, that you are learning the Hungarian language), consider the "-t" suffix (-at, -et, ot, -öt, -ut, -üt depending on the word). So, the correct way is to say "nagyon szeretem a magyar nyelvet" and "most tanulom a magyar nyelvet". Hope this helps, and keep up the good work! Totally impressive, respect!
Hei Tuomi, terveisiä Unkarista. Toivottavasti nautit unkarin oppimisesta, suomi on yksi suosikkikielistäni. Kulttuurimme ovat niin samanlaisia, että haluan puhua suomea.
I recall a Hungarian person telling me about his trip to Finland. He fell asleep on the flight and woke up when the plane arrived in Finland. The pilots were speaking Finnish, as was everyone around him. He thought he had a seizure because it all sounded like his own language, but he didn't understand a word.
In real, I learn finnish and when I begin, I was thinking why am I doing that, but 6 month after, when you have good vocabulary and know how to conjugate and all it becomes easier Edit: sometimes hard to understand while hearing
Actually i find much more hungarian sounded word in estonian than in finnish. Other hungarians propably feel the same as those funny line happens to be twice in the comments. The Lajos one.
Hungarian seems to have more consonants, Finnish vowels, and Estonian something in between them. The melody of these languages has something that connects them, but the most difficult seems to be Hungarian, I am writing it from the perspective of a person who speaks Polish, we have a lot of sounds quite similar to Hungarian, but it is too distant to feel any other similarity.
I swear I love Hungary. I want to visit so bad and see Balaton and Budapest and all the smaller places. I looked on Google Maps and the nature is like a fairytale. If I had to move somewhere it would be Hungary. Maybe one day I will. Love from Finland
@@morlano3074 Oh but it's like that everywhere :/ The coldest and rudest people in every country tend to inhabit the capital city. Everyone is hella busy and unfriendly 😅 This is the case in Helsinki, as well 🤷♀️ And beautiful and unattractive places together make any city. (Most bigger towns in Finland are somewhat unattractive, lol but the nature is beautiful if you like that) I want to see everything in Hungary 😊 I planned going on an interrail and travelling to Hungary and some surrounding countries a couple years back but I became pregnant and had a child so I had to cancel. I'm still waiting for a good moment to go 😁 I hope you get to travel around Fennoscandia, too!
Hungarian is such an underrated language. Everyone’s talking about how Finnish and Estonian are so charming and unique to listen to. Hungarian is just as nice
Uralic language all are vocal languages, but only finish has still voval harmony, and Minor language Võro. Estonians lost they vocal harmony few centurys ago, but have no idea abput Hungary. But all them stull build vocals same way.
Grover S. Krantz (1931-2002), a world-renowned American anthropologist and professor at Washington State University, in his work The Geographical Formation of European Languages, recognizes Hungarian, which has been treated as Europe's stepchild until now, as the founder of Europe's culture. According to him, the u.n. "Indo-European languages" developed very late in Europe. That is why 30% of their vocabulary is not of "Indo-European" origin, and there are no "Indo-European" river names on the early maps of Europe. We are more interested in the following sentence: "...so the Greek language was formed in its current location in 6500 BC, and the Celtic language in Ireland in 3500 BC. The antiquity of the Hungarian language in the Carpathian Basin is similarly surprising; I find that its origins lead to the Mesolithic, preceding the Stone Age." Furthermore: "At least on one important point, the theory of people's migration is the opposite of the previous theorem. It is generally believed that the Hungarians of the Urals in the IX. century, they moved into the Carpathian basin from an eastern area. I find that all groups speaking the Uralic language spread from Hungary, in a much earlier age, in the opposite direction." Grover S. Krantz, The Geographical Formation of European Languages. (Ősi Örökségünk Alapítvány, Budapest, 2000) Original title and publisher of the work: Geographical Development of European Languages Peter Lang Publishing Inc. New York 1988. Translated by: Imre Kálmán
Grover S. Krantz (1931-2002), a world-renowned American anthropologist and professor at Washington State University, in his work The Geographical Formation of European Languages, recognizes Hungarian, which has been treated as Europe's stepchild until now, as the founder of Europe's culture. According to him, the u.n. "Indo-European languages" developed very late in Europe. That is why 30% of their vocabulary is not of "Indo-European" origin, and there are no "Indo-European" river names on the early maps of Europe. We are more interested in the following sentence: "...so the Greek language was formed in its current location in 6500 BC, and the Celtic language in Ireland in 3500 BC. The antiquity of the Hungarian language in the Carpathian Basin is similarly surprising; I find that its origins lead to the Mesolithic, preceding the Stone Age." Furthermore: "At least on one important point, the theory of people's migration is the opposite of the previous theorem. It is generally believed that the Hungarians of the Urals in the IX. century, they moved into the Carpathian basin from an eastern area. I find that all groups speaking the Uralic language spread from Hungary, in a much earlier age, in the opposite direction." Grover S. Krantz, The Geographical Formation of European Languages. (Ősi Örökségünk Alapítvány, Budapest, 2000) Original title and publisher of the work: Geographical Development of European Languages Peter Lang Publishing Inc. New York 1988. Translated by: Imre Kálmán bilecz.blog.hu/2018/03/22/about_the_origin_of_the_hungarian_language
All three languages seem to have the same cadence, probably because of the tendency to emphasize the first syllable of a word, regardless how many syllables in the word. I speak some Finnish and Hungarian and they all sound pleasant to my ear.
OMG...I never heard the tree languages spoken and placed together like this. Incredible. I felt, like i'm drunk, and peoples are talking in my house. Doesn't sounds foreign at all. Almost upsetting, how come i don't understand it. :)
Sziasztok. Nagyon szép a Magyar nyelv . Magyarul szeretek tanulni, de nem értettem amit mondott, mert a gyönyörű nő nagyon gyorsan beszél. Köszönöm szépen
I'm usually thrown off by the s c z sounds when trying to listen to Hungarian. I tend to associate those with Slavic languages. This was a very good sample.
Finnish language feels so relaxed. In Estonian I could recognise some international words such as kilometer, millimeter, centimeter. Maybe in Finnish and Hungarian it's the same, idk. I just like this stuff
Those are universal words and are understandable in any language using metric units. PS you write them as kilomeeter, millimeeter and sentimeeter in Estonian. Est has a lot of double vowel words.
Hungarian has a few more sounds than Finnish or Estonian. Mostly consonantal, like sh and ch ( as in chart), and zh. Estonian has almost exactly the same sounds as Finnish, rounded u, rounded o (ö), heavy on the consonants k, p, l, s, and n in particular. It was cool to hear them all together.
For me as a hungarian, finnish and estonian sounds VERY similar. The only thing gives estonian away, that it has no vowel harmony like the other two. Listening to it for a while there comes a suspicion that it is something different than finnish. And that 'õ' voice.. :)
that’s true! as a finn without any study of estonian language i can barely understand what was said. with the hungarian i was in total loss. i see there’s some sounds that doesn’t come up in either finnish or the estonian one, like the ”s” sound is more soft with some ”h” in it. if that makes any sense. I wonder if you are hearing ”ö” sound and if there’s some similar sound in hungarian? 🤔
Languages sounds to non speakers: Hungarian🇭🇺: Esetesh höesheöüshehesöshiö Finnish🇫🇮: Kukkeneseissemnekkakokkarikkonenpoihha Estonian🇪🇪: Hayyonolüklüyesterveistikuohtomecoponutviis
Pretty accurate, but I think what you wanted to write was: HU esett is a hó, ő sem hessegeti el a hőt. 'The snow did fall, he/she doesn't send the heat away.'
@@darkfantasybrun5381 they mean the phonology, not the vocabulary. It's like how greek and Spanish have similar phonology but are mutually unintelligible.
Would be more interesting if you included mansi, mokshan, erzän, Karelian, udmurt and Mari languages. All of them are heavily russianized (slavicized) in pronounciation and vocabulary.
Ural Altai has been debunked many times, Altai itself has also been debunked. Only reason you turks claim you're related to us uralics is because your peoples have failed to achieve anything notable after the Osman dynasty fell, except the Armenian genocide of course, but hey, the exception proves the rule.
@@themondayguy ei kyllä ole turkkilaisten kanssa siinä asiassa mitään tekemistä. Tällänen teoria kyllä löytyy, mutta teoria on teoria, ja se ei ole faktaa. On paljon todennäköisempiäkin teorioita olemassa. Ainiin tämäkin väite että suomalaiset olisivat mongoleita, on nazi saksalaisen lääkärin päätelmiä, ilman että hän edes tiesi tarkkaan miltä me edes näytämme. Hänen mukaansa meillä olisi ruskeat silmät, tumma tukka, ja olemme tummempia, kuin muut eurooppalaiset, mutta no, ulos kun menee, niin huomaa että aika reisille mentiin. Myös swedut ovat tätä jauhanneet, mutta itseasiassa meijän tarkasta alkuperästä ei ole mitään täyttä varmuutta Suomalaisten aasialaisiin silmiin? Meillä on Hei pääosin siniset silmät ja näytämme ihan eurooppalaisille. Meillä ei ole aasialaisia silmiä tai niiden muotoja. Silmät ovat ihan samat mitä löytyy yleisestikin eurooppalaisilla valkoisilla ihmisillä. Me emme ole tummempia. Meillä on enemmän dna:ssa kyllä aasialaista perää kuin esim läntisen euroopan mailla, mutta tämä ei ole mikään poikkeuksellisen suuri lukema kuitenkaan, mikä tekisi meistä aasialaisia jotenkin enemmän, kuin eurooppalaisia
it is actually pretty easy to pick up basic estonian imo as a native speaker of a germanic language. I understood surprisingly lot off what was said, despite not knowing the language. I have just listened to it from my 3 visits to the country, and when I was together with an Estonian for a few years. Never tried to learn it, and its been years since I listened to it last.
Only proto words are similar between hungarian and suomi. Keep in mind, that we are speaking about origins of several thousend years. In the early 13th century a hungarian speaking minority still existed in the ural region, but was wiped out after the mongol invasion. The same happened to many uralic tribes.
@Covers Guitar hm. A nemet behatás is valóban stimmel. Így van ,nem török ,azonban ha jobban megfigyeled a halotti beszéd 1195-ös hangzását ,nagyon durván törökösen hangzik 😮: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-gtgepLR6AsI.html Itt inkább mondtam volna én magam is valami egy belső ázsiai/török nyelvnek,ismeretlen eredetű hatásokkal, mintsem kifejezetten urálinak. De egyébként ,ha megnézed ,anno mi voltunk a legdélebbi területén a nyelvcsaládnak,már már a mai Kazahsztán határát súrolta a Magna Hungaria ,mi voltunk a legközelebb minden mongol/szkíta/,török menőcsávó randalírozásaihoz ,úgyhogy ezért is van az hogy a miénkbe több törökös elem került mint mint pl a legészakkbra élő/ vándorolt finnekébe. Így van. Ma már nagyon tág a genetikai diaszpóra,ami sajnos gáz ,de legalább a nyelvünket meg tudtuk őrizni😎
For me as estonian i like finnish some worlds are soo different but some are same :) but hingerian i sust do not undesthend 95%of it meyby somting but bretty weird
@@Mate_Antal_Zoltan We have Vowel Harmony while Estonian got rid of it. We have Front (A, O, U), Back (Ä, Ö, Y) and Neutral (E, I) Vowels. Words can only be either made with front or back vowels. Neutral vowels can exist in both words. Compound words that got fused from two seperate words originally are an exception. For example "Tällainen", which was originally "Tämän lainen". Examples of Vowel harmony. If we conjugate the word "Käytävä" meaning "corridor", to mean "from the corridor", it would be "Käytävältä". And same with "Talo" which means "House", to mean "from the House", it would be "Talolta". In both cases the rest of the word follows vowel harmony. It's not "Käytävälta" or "Taloltä", because it break vowel harmony. It sounds wrong to our ears, and looks wrong to our eyes to have those back vowels and front vowels mixed in one word like that. Estonian didn't conserve this feature after it broke from Proto-Finnic, while Finnish conserved it.
As a fellow Hungarian, I disagree. For example we use a lot of "sh" and "ch" sounds, which the other two don't even really have. That alone makes Hungarian sound quite different.
Hi! I’m hungarian and I wanna start to learn to speak finnish. As I know it’s a very hard language like the hungarian too. I hope I’ll be fine and sucsess. Is the grammar difficult? Thx for the answers 😊🇭🇺❤️🇫🇮
As a Hungarian speaker I perceive Finnish and Estonian very similar, although they are clearly distinguishable. Apart from maybe the intonation, going by how the languages sound, I wouldn't put Hungarian in the same group with Finnish and Estonian.
I mean, of course the sound of Hungarian is going to be completely different from other Uralic languages since Hungarian has been developing with different influences for thousands of years. But there are still clear signs about the relation between Hungarian and other Uralic languages. Things such as grammar, the 21% or so confirmed Uralic derived/inherited words in Hungarian (out of which a large chunk is some of the most basic, everyday words) along with regular sound correspondents between the two. Some of these correspondents are as follows: (Hu/Fi/Ee) Hungarian f corresponds to Fi/Ee p fa/puu/puu fél/pelätä/pelgama fő/pää/peä Before front vowels, Hungarian k corresponds to Fi/Ee k könny/kyynele/küünistama kéz/käsi/käsi kő/kivi/kivi Before back vowels, Hungarian h corresponds to Fi/Ee k hal/kala/kala ház/kota/koda húgy/kusi/kusi Hungarian t corresponds to Fi/Ee t tél/talvi/talv tud/tuntea/tundma
@tommeiner9983 it doesn't mean that it's correct though. There are several different theories, also some that question the taxonomy of specifically the uralic languages.
I just read a few comments and wondering how people can have argument about languages:) This is ridiculous. This is not a competition, you cannot rank them by how they sounds.
Opinion is subjective. :) It’s all based on the way it sounds. Some languages sound more melodic, some more poetic, some a lot more blunt. I think they all sound beautiful, but I like how Estonian sounds the most.
There are several Saami languages. I think 6-9? Three are spoken in Finland. Are there weather reports available in these languages or is it only Russian in Russia? Saami weather reports are available.
I don't speak in neither of these languages, but I can tell apart all 3, especially Magyar from other 2. As a native turkic speaker I can even catch some similar words in Hungarian and it sounds more like Udmurtian than Finnish or Estonian
It’s not weird. 1541-1699. There was plenty of time to receive some words. Nearly four thousand years before when we Finnish, Estonian, Hungarian speak same languages, proto uralic. Afterward Hungarian wandered long route and got in touch with tribes who spoke turks languages.
@@istvanpeterkovacs730 A türk eredetű szavaink többsége a honfoglalás előtti időkből származik. A vándorlások során sok türk néppel érintkeztek elődeink (kazah, baskír stb...).
My great grandfather was hungarian and volunteered to go to Finland to fight the Russians in ww2. He said many others did too. I guess that was a long time ago, not sure if it's still the same.
