Тёмный
No video :(

What EXACTLY is Temperature?! 

The Science Asylum
Подписаться 686 тыс.
Просмотров 126 тыс.
50% 1

You may have heard temperature is just the kinetic energy of molecules, but that's a subtle lie. In this video, Nick Lucid explains those subtlies in the only way he knows how: CRAZY!
________________________________
VIDEO ANNOTATIONS
What is Energy REALLY?! • What is Energy REALLY?!
The Higgs Isn’t Real: • Video
Mass? Energy? What's The Difference? • Mass? Energy? What's T...
SOL and S'mores: • Can we Measure the Spe...
Pole-in-a-Barn Problem: • Fit a 6 ft Pole in a 5...
________________________________
COOL LINKS & SOURCES
Hyperphysics:
hyperphysics.ph...
hyperphysics.ph...
hyperphysics.ph...
hyperphysics.ph...
hyperphysics.ph...
Wikipedia:
en.wikipedia.or...
en.wikipedia.or...
en.wikipedia.or...
en.wikipedia.or...
________________________________
SCIENCE ASYLUM STUFF
More videos at: / thescienceasylum
Vlog: / thenicklucid
Facebook: / scienceasylum
Twitter: @nicklucid / nicklucid
Google+: www.google.com/...
Main Site: www.scienceasyl...
T-Shirts: scienceasylum.s...
________________________________
IMAGE CREDITS
Logo designed by: Ben Sharef
Stock Photos and Clipart
- Wikimedia Commons commons.wikimed...
- Openclipart openclipart.org/
- or I made them myself...
en.wikipedia.or...

Опубликовано:

 

27 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 389   
@jb_lofi
@jb_lofi 7 лет назад
Don't understand why these videos aren't more popular. Bloody good job.
@cashbonanza963
@cashbonanza963 7 лет назад
I've been watching science videos since 2012 like Vsauce, Veritasium, Seeker, SciShow... you name it. RU-vid has never suggested this channel to me until a couple of weeks ago. I think RU-vid have to revise their algorithms
@adeshpoz1167
@adeshpoz1167 6 лет назад
Cash Bonanza NOPE! It's just that RU-vid is a little biased.
@jhyland87
@jhyland87 7 лет назад
What I find funny is when I try to learn new concepts, I teach them to myself in my head, even asking questions and replying. These conversations are remarkably similar to that of you and your clone dude.. lol
@cucumbercytus
@cucumbercytus Год назад
Every. Day.
@abubakrshah6218
@abubakrshah6218 2 месяца назад
O. Or ​@@cucumbercytus
@spiralect
@spiralect 5 лет назад
People who not only KNOW a lot about a topic but also share what they know in an amazing understanding way>>>>>> UR DOING AMAZING!
@secularisrael
@secularisrael 7 лет назад
That's a good explanation of the practical meaning of temperature, but more generally the concept can be applied to any system with a Boltzmann distribution of energy, regardless of whether it is made up of "matter", and it can also be generalized into several kinds of "temperature" in the quantum case, e.g. based on the partial derivative of the energy with respect to entropy.
@sagarsharma-qf1hs
@sagarsharma-qf1hs 9 лет назад
Americans and the metric system don't go along...do they??
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 9 лет назад
sagar sharma No. We're one of only 3 countries that still use the old British imperial units: Liberia, Myanmar, and the United States of America
@sagarsharma-qf1hs
@sagarsharma-qf1hs 9 лет назад
***** Yes.. You should make a video on it...what are units area and why we need standard units.. and I understand why USA still use the imperial units, but why do liberia and Myanmar use those??
@TheJoshtheboss
@TheJoshtheboss 9 лет назад
***** Even that you have modified, e.g. U.S. Gallon :)
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 9 лет назад
sagar sharma They're called "imperial" because it's leftover from the British empire (which included many countries). It's actually a really good video idea.
@sagarsharma-qf1hs
@sagarsharma-qf1hs 9 лет назад
***** Well I am from India and India was also a major part of british empire...But i am very glad that India has adopted the metric system
@ornizjquinonesrivera3695
@ornizjquinonesrivera3695 6 лет назад
Dude you are awesome. I am a Mech. ENG on to study medicine thanks for helping me REMEMBER complex STUFF!
@seetheious9879
@seetheious9879 6 лет назад
So why doesn't the temperature drop inside a vaccuum chamber if we pump out most of the air? How many molecules do we need to take out of a chamber before it starts to cool significantly? Is it possible to insulate something with a near vacuum?
@Altorin
@Altorin 5 лет назад
A lot of human perception of temperature is also based on conductivity. Things that are more conductive feel colder to us because hear escapes into and out of it faster. It gives us a weird relationship with temperature because the actual number on the thermometer is just a small part of what goes into our perception of temperature.
@wassupyo4775
@wassupyo4775 3 года назад
Best explanation of temperature I’ve seen so far
@ManuTheGreat79
@ManuTheGreat79 4 года назад
Nice to see that you used Richard Feynman's temperature analogy with the damp towels.
@srikanthtupurani6316
@srikanthtupurani6316 6 лет назад
temperature indicates the average kinetic energy of the molecules in a substance. best example is if we have have a drum of water at 30 Celsius and a glass of water at 100Celsius. then we can see that the total kinetic energy of all the molecules in drum is much greater than total kinetic energy of all the molecules in glass of water. but if we look at average energy it is just opposite. temperature is due to molecular motion. the potential energy due to the bonding etc does not contribute to temperature
@ashutoshbhakuni303
@ashutoshbhakuni303 2 года назад
Could you pls do a supplementary video on why temperature doesnt change during melting and boiling? And what exactly is potential energy of molecules?
@hhandle
@hhandle Год назад
Look up latent heat temperature doesn't rise as the energy is being used to break intermolecular force and not contribute to kinetic energy
@holgerjrgensen2166
@holgerjrgensen2166 3 месяца назад
Heat and Freeze, is the Two Legs, as the entire Stuff-side walk on, all Stuff (+Mind-Stuff) is a certain composition of Heat and Freeze.
@philipberthiaume2314
@philipberthiaume2314 7 лет назад
Subscribed, thanks for video. One thing I always fail to understand is why ppl of science would use non metric measures. Imperial or US standard is so unhelpful when converting across vitually everything. My perfect temperature is 20°C. I am perfectly aware of it's relationship to freezing, boiling, my ideal body temp and the swimming pool next door. I also can easily translate to weight or volume if needed, all without having to use a calculator.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 7 лет назад
The U.S. is stubborn.
@Nehmo
@Nehmo 6 лет назад
If you mean to discuss the use of non-metric by this channel, Nick addresses it from time to time. He justifies his use of non-metric by the fact that a lot of his audience is still on non-metric.
@philipberthiaume2314
@philipberthiaume2314 6 лет назад
Thanks Hehmo for your helpful reply. I understand and certainly, there is a distinction between intent to provide entertainment and public awareness. My point then would be to say that anything related to science is usually to promote a better understanding of the natural world. It is is intuitive to use the most efficient models possible to describe whatever processes are involved and the use of non metric measures does not accomplish that. Thanks again!
@adeshpoz1167
@adeshpoz1167 6 лет назад
The Science Asylum So true dude. 😂 They have superiority. (Sorry to say but it's true.) They don't want to lose their things but say to do that to every country.😡
@Altorin
@Altorin 5 лет назад
@Adrijana Radosevic you need more data to convert weight into volume. They are measurements of two completely different things. Weight measures the earth's pull on something's mass. So if you take the weight and remove the influence of gravity you get its mass. Then you need to know the density of the substance you're measuring. Some things are heavier then other things. A cubic foot of iron has more mass then a cubic foot of water. If you know the density of a substance and you know it's mass you can figure out roughly how much volume that amount of stuff would fill. I say roughly because volumes don't always stack into neat and orderly numbers - take 1 cup of water and pour it into 1 cup of alcohol and mix them together and the result is a little less then 2 cups. Water molecules are small enough to slip between the alcohol molecules so the mixture takes up less space. So.. It's complex and is not a function you should be generally concerning yourself with.
@pselv11
@pselv11 4 года назад
Can someone please explain from 0.46 to 0.57 didnt quite follow what mr Lucid was trying to say.thanks.
@Violent2aShadow
@Violent2aShadow 5 лет назад
Cool video! I mean: I like the temperature of my videos to be on the cooler side.
@SuperVstech
@SuperVstech 5 лет назад
1:47 I am slightly turned on by the jiggle molecule... is that ok?
@naumanbaloch6008
@naumanbaloch6008 3 года назад
Temperature is a measure of a coldness or hotness of object. The temperature of an increase when it gain heat and decreases when it loses heat
@samaiatraforti9060
@samaiatraforti9060 4 года назад
I love Nick so much. Seeing his face makes me happy:) Spread the science fun yiew!!! Thankyou for sharing your gifts!
@TemploV
@TemploV 6 лет назад
you are the best in explaining everything, love it
@polontang7909
@polontang7909 2 года назад
If a body of mass accelerates linearly and speed inceases, the average kinetic energy per molecule increases. Does it mean the temperature of this body of mass increases? My instinct is no but I cannot explain why. From the individual molecule's point of view, the average kinetic energy must have increased. Does the molecule know which part of the kinetic energy is for temperature and which part is for the linear motion?
@bvagasky83
@bvagasky83 3 года назад
My favorite temperature is -40 degrees. Fahrenheit or Celsius, doesn't matter.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 3 года назад
Nice 👍
@alessandrobarbieri2098
@alessandrobarbieri2098 4 года назад
Remember: temperature is defined only for systems in a stable equilibrium state while energy and entropy are always defined. Also temperature is related to the tangent of the curve (in the energy-entropy plane) of the stable equilibrium states of a system. More infos on the thermodynamic book of Gyftopoulos-Beretta
@e8root
@e8root 6 лет назад
my fav temp is 1.417E32 K, not too warm not too cold ^_^
@pug7552
@pug7552 6 лет назад
Get this guy more subscribers already!!
@jamessever8936
@jamessever8936 7 лет назад
I am trying to figure out what the difference between temperature and pressure is on the microscopic level. They seem to be the same, both are due to the movement of the atoms/molecules. Yet they are described differently as p/t*v=c How does this work?
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 7 лет назад
Short Answer: Temperature is about the kinetic energy, whereas Pressure is about the momentum. Both kinetic energy and momentum have to do with movement, but they tell us different things about what the molecules will do.
@perttituorila4568
@perttituorila4568 4 года назад
I got into a big trouble with my one atom in a space thought experiment (how to define its heat). This video clarified it instantly! Thank you, sir!
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 4 года назад
You’re very welcome. Glad I could help! 😁
@IvanVesely920
@IvanVesely920 2 года назад
​@@ScienceAsylum I always had a similiar thing bugging me. Does it make sense to talk about the temperature of vacuum?
@jakehayes1345
@jakehayes1345 6 лет назад
wicked awesome ..... you are great! you don't duck the Q's by asking but what exactly is it??? and make me chuckle as well..
@parthabanerjee1234
@parthabanerjee1234 3 года назад
It is very important to be a little crazy.
@britoroque
@britoroque 4 года назад
Is it possible to cool things with microwaves? Why microwaves always hot things? Or with a magnetic field? Is it possible to cool something with a magnetic field?
@jamesquags
@jamesquags 4 года назад
This guy is the absolute best. I live near Ann Arbor and hope I run into him one day to give him a high 5
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 4 года назад
🙏
@Jjunior130
@Jjunior130 7 лет назад
3:03 mine is between 75 F and 84 F
@simonlewis9487
@simonlewis9487 5 лет назад
Wow,some ppl are going deep in these comments.. I'll have to wait for your comment response time on this to sort the wheat from the chaff,so to speak..
@stringsseeds
@stringsseeds 7 лет назад
It's a great video. I have a question hope it's not silly. How exactly is temperature passed from one object to another since they are just kinetic energy of electrons, atoms, and molecules? Meaning someone next to me running around in the room doesn't make me run too. Thanks in advance!
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 7 лет назад
Someone else running around a room doesn't have any effect on how you're moving.......... until they run right into you. That's what's happening on an atomic level with heat and temperature. If the atoms/molecules/particles can pump into each other, then they can exchange the energy. Sometimes they do that by directly touching and sometimes through whatever matter is in-between. If they're not touching and there is no matter in-between, the energy has to be turned into some type of light (usually infrared) and sent that way. Now matter what the method is though, it's about atoms/molecules/particles pumping into each other.
@stringsseeds
@stringsseeds 7 лет назад
Thanks very much. It is very clear. One question is how atoms/molecules/particles exchange energy? Is it through light (photons)?
@victherocker
@victherocker 7 лет назад
they bump into each other, one transmitting momentum into the other, making it move
@solapowsj25
@solapowsj25 4 года назад
It's just motion of molecules or atoms about a point. Terms team aperture (tem-perature) explain it well. Closely related terms are phonons, infrared rays, electromagnetic radiation, 🔥heat. About light 🌑, it takes more energy to knock the electron about inside the atoms, so a 100 watt LED visible light lamp won't heat 🔥up the object as much as IR would.
@tinypapitooo4065
@tinypapitooo4065 8 лет назад
im just watching this for my test so this is so helpfull thx for doing these vids
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 8 лет назад
+Spider Jokey You're welcome. Glad they're coming in handy.
@sagarsharma-qf1hs
@sagarsharma-qf1hs 9 лет назад
+Polska Pro....There is an absoulute hot..I meant there is a temperature which is considered to be the maximum limit of temp...its called 'Planck Temperature' its 2.55*1032 degrees Fahrenheit. Nick please correct me if I am wrong
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 9 лет назад
sagar sharma Well, yes, technically, it's *considered* the hottest temperature, but I'm not sure I'd put it in the same category as absolute zero. Absolute zero is the coldest because there isn't any motion less than no motion. Planck temperature may or may not be a physical limit. It's just that our laws of physics can't explain any temperatures hotter than it... we may just be wrong. Unfortunately, it's kinda tough to test it since that temperature has only existed in the universe once. [For some reason, Polska Pro has replies blocked. I can't even tag him in this post.]
@DrSagan
@DrSagan 9 лет назад
Hey nick. yesterday i was confused by a teacher , he told me that temperature is only the degree of hotness not coldness , because that we measure it with thermometer which means to measure heat . please nick could you really explain it to me because i am with my studies and i can make my prof understand as well. please let me know as fast as you can..
@SuperVstech
@SuperVstech 5 лет назад
Au Sagan teacher didn’t explain their answer properly... Temperature is motion of molecules... hotness and coldness are meaningless... heat is the amount of energy in an object. Temperature is the concentration of the heat. You can remove or add heat... you can’t add cold. You lose heat. You put a colder object in proximity to a warmer object it isn’t moving cold to the object, you are moving heat from the warm object to the cold one.
@arsg346kj
@arsg346kj 5 лет назад
I love the Batman shirt in the shower!
@ryanofottawa
@ryanofottawa Год назад
How does the kinetic energy of one molecule influence/interact with another? Is it that as one molecule "jiggles" so to does its influence on the electromagnetic field and when it approaches another molecule their individual effects on the field interact? I'm imagining a process similar to how photons were described as causing charges of molecules to wiggle in the Rayleigh scattering video. Basically how does heat transfer actually work?
@tom_something
@tom_something 4 года назад
I think you were the one who explained this in another video, but since temperature is about kinetic energy, if there's a mixture of more than one type of gas molecule, then when they reach temperature equilibrium, the molecules with less mass will have more speed per molecule than the larger gas molecules. This explains (though incompletely, as I understand it), why lighter gases more easily achieve escape velocity in the upper atmosphere. Really interesting stuff. It _is_ kind of weird to think that the intermolecular motion can't be directly translated to making the whole mass move faster or slower, but that's how averages work. Because velocity is squared in calculating KE, the average effective speed is positive. But if we re-added (thing?) direction to the kinetic energy, the whole system would be zero. Plus, we're already used to the idea that rotational momentum can't spontaneously become linear motion (and actually for the same reason: the linear speed is zero when you put all the chunks back together), so maybe it shouldn't be as hard to "let go" of as it seems at first.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 4 года назад
I think I might have mentioned it in my Mars video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fU0RN_dC2PY.html As for the "v" in KE being squared, you're right. If you wanted to account for the direction, you'd need to use linear momentum "p" instead. Adding up all the momentum's you'd get zero because that represents the _total_ momentum of the whole thing (i.e. it's center of mass).
@deluxeassortment
@deluxeassortment 5 лет назад
Heat has turned out to be far more confusing that I could have imagined. So far I have put together the understanding that atoms vibrate in specific patterns, and molecules vibrate as a combination of those patterns. The more atoms in a molecule, the more complex the motion. Do I have that right? What actually causes that motion, is it the vibration described by quantum physics? It makes me wonder what actual paths the nucleus and the electrons are taking that cause the motion.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
_"The more atoms in a molecule, the more complex the motion."_ This is correct. However, that doesn't have much influence on the amount of thermal energy something can have or the amount of heat it can transfer. All that matters for that is how kinetic energy is there, not how complex the motion is.
@deluxeassortment
@deluxeassortment 5 лет назад
@@ScienceAsylum You're awesome, thanks for always answering my questions!
@TJF588
@TJF588 9 лет назад
I was going to quote The Venture Brothers, but it looks like the Eldorado Canyon Mine Tour also attests to "a cool comfortable 70 degrees".
@ooloncolluphid7904
@ooloncolluphid7904 6 лет назад
My ideal temperature is 9. What's that? Nine _what?_ Oh, I don't know. Just 9.
@arnoldcaines9012
@arnoldcaines9012 6 лет назад
Sitting in the house: 68°. Outside: 73°. Riding the Harley: 82°.
@blueckaym
@blueckaym 5 лет назад
Nice illustration that we don't actually understand what is temperature :) (at least I don't) Good point that just naming averages isn't always helpful (and if it can lose meaning then imho that meaning wasn't very accurate in the first place). I think in order to understand Temperature better (at quantum level) we should try to observe and analyze exactly those extremes: absolute zero (if it's actually achievable, or at least test it mathematically if no possible in a lab), and how exactly temperature is transferred between objects with temperature difference. For example it wasn't that long ago I suddenly realized that if you need material contact to transfer temperature, then in vacuum of space even if "ambient temperature" is about 2°K you wouldn't freeze like you would in extreme cold on Earth (where you're either in water or air environment), or even if considering that vacuum isn't ideal the surrounding particles extreme scarcity would take away your temperature very very slowly ... Well turns out we lose temperature also by infra-red radiation which doesn't require material medium. But even if counting infrared radiation you would lose your temperature in space (in much higher temp.difference env.) slower than on Earth (in much lower temp.difference env.) - that's why we use vacuum in thermos bottles. Also particles in space might actually increase your temperature just as most of them increase Earth's temperature (well at least high-energy particles like the ones the Sun shoots at us). It's a similar question with the decompression expansion in vacuum. Fluids that don't have strong (or none at all) inter-molecular bonds would simply fly-away of rapidly decrease the frequency at which they hit each other. And we know from observation that in such cases temperature loss is very rapid (that how your deodorant gets colder when you use it for a bit longer). But this puzzles me - if during the decompression expansion of a gas its molecules are flying away from each other and for that period they hit each other less and less then how is temperature loss so fast?! :/ Also at these critical limits that many materials change their aggregate state - solid, liquid, gas & plasma we know (again from observation) that the big energy change leads to fast temperature changes. To simplify - at most elementary level - we know that why photons have only kinetic energy, they can still change electrons' energy levels, and apparently increase the atoms (and molecules) temperature. But assuming we can for example release (and measure the temperature of) a single hydrogen atom from ISS then how (and how fast) would this atom lose its temperature - or in other terms how it would lose its energy that it had just a moment ago at about 293°K (ie about 20°C in the space station). And have we mapped this energy change to the atom's constituent particles energies? Also why do we emit infrared radiation in space (assuming we're warmer than 0°K), I mean why not radio-waves? Do these energy-changes of the above H-atom only come in discreet levels - so that for example the H's electron can drop its energy-level with exactly one level; how to protons & neutrons lose energy in vacuum, and so on ...
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
1. Yes, we do always lose some temperature (thermal energy) by emitting infrared light. However, that process is pretty inefficient. Because of that, a major concern for spaceships is actually _overheating._ ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9Xs3mGhQGxM.html 2. The reason we emit (mostly) infrared light and not some other range on the EM spectrum is because of our temperature. As we cooled off, the peak frequency of that light would change. Eventually, we _could_ get cold enough that we'd emit a different type of light. Like you said, the average temperature of space is a little less than 2 kelvin. That's why we detect microwave/radio light coming from all directions in space. It's called the cosmic microwave background or CMB. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3tCMd1ytvWg.html 3. Yes, hydrogen's energy levels are discrete (just like any other atom). It can only absorb certain frequencies of light: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FQJj2kBJ5A8.html
@abaddonk1
@abaddonk1 6 лет назад
ok and what about the temperature of a small number of particles/molecules? btw great video
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 6 лет назад
How small? If you only have, say, 10 particles/molecules in the contain, it would be difficult to find someone who would call anything about that "temperature."
@batfan1939
@batfan1939 4 года назад
Outdoors, my ideal temperature is between 75 and 85 °F. Indoors, it's between 65 and 75 °F.
@MrFieldbranch
@MrFieldbranch 3 года назад
Can you please explain what static pressure really is in a pipe? What exactly has happened to the water molecules after the pump? Has the pipe become more "crowded" with water molecules? How does that work when water is considered incompressible?
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 3 года назад
Molecules don't _have_ to get more crowded to have more pressure. They just have to bump into each other (and the inner surface of whatever container they're in) more often. Getting more crowded is one way they can do that, but it's not the only way.
@TheImaginarygurl
@TheImaginarygurl 6 лет назад
I've always heard heat is infrared waves/infrared radiation. What's up with that?
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 6 лет назад
That's one way that heat can transfer between objects, but not the only way.
@Crazy-lb4im
@Crazy-lb4im 4 года назад
So the reason because temperature stabilises beetween objects is because of entropy right? Please correct me if I'm wrong because i've watched your newer videos and I feel like you would conclude it also here. Unless I'm getting something wrong and switching concepts or something.
@antman674
@antman674 3 года назад
Isn't 68-74 degrees the ideal temperature for ale fermentation?
@jasonmathias5343
@jasonmathias5343 4 года назад
Why do the 4 fundamental forces merge into one unified filed if temperature gets hot enough? I want to know why temperature unifies the universe into one filed, and one substance?
@potawatomi100
@potawatomi100 4 года назад
Love this video and have seen it multiple times.
@lanotasballesterosmadrigal1379
If all the molecules in a container are moving in the same direction at a particular speed, let's say running in circles clockwise because of a magnetic field or something, would you measure different temperatures spinning around the container in the same direction and with the same speed and standing still? In case you're spinning and it looks colder than the rest of the room to you, wouldn't you be you seeing a colder object passing energy to a hotter object? Thank you for your awesome videos.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 6 лет назад
It's possible that you could measure different temperatures in different places in a container. Temperature gradients are very common. That isn't anything that strange.
@lanotasballesterosmadrigal1379
I meant if all the particles in the container are moving in circles clockwise and you're moving "with them", they're not moving for you, so they don't have kinetic energy, so the container is cold from your point of view, colder than the rest of the room, but the static room is getting heat from it, isn't it?
@hymenpierce
@hymenpierce 3 года назад
So if there was no matter in the big bang, i.e. the universe existed in a small dense state of pure energy, how did the universe even have a temperature to cool off to allow baryo and leptogenesis and allow matter to form? Also EXACTLY what do they mean by pure energy? I hear that description a lot but have never seen it elaborated upon.
@Fif0l
@Fif0l 4 года назад
My ideal temperature is -30 degrees Celsius. Then I can wear those heavy woolen coats that make me look like a civil war general.
@josephsalomone
@josephsalomone 3 года назад
My favorite temperature is somewhere around 3 megakelvin. I enjoy fusing lithium.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 3 года назад
🤔 Interesting.
@mongoose404
@mongoose404 2 года назад
Hello Nick! Please explain how decreasing temperature by using lasers works.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 2 года назад
My friend Physics Girl made a video several years ago on that exact topic: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-hFkiMWrA2Bc.html
@swhbpocl
@swhbpocl 4 года назад
I don’t get it...yet...I’d like to see this down to quantum level, please. I temperature linear or quantified? I mean for a single molecule or smaller?
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 4 года назад
Temperature isn't something that exists on a subatomic level, so quantum mechanics isn't really relevant. Individual molecules can't have a temperature. It's something that emerges in a _collection_ of molecules.
@johannes7110
@johannes7110 9 лет назад
Im trying to grasp your two videos on pressure and temperature... So temperature is the movement of molecules if it does not change the shape of the macroscopic object. When we measure temperature with a Hg or alcohol thermometer we use that the liquid expands when the temperature goes up, that is it changes the borders of the object. Pressure is the force from the bumps of the molecules going in the direction of the probe? you talked about shifting spinning and so on. Can all these movements contribute to temperature and pressure? I mean if I measure the expanding of a liquid I have a hard time understanding why spinning could change the borders of an object. Also If pressure is the movement of the molecules applying a force to a surface and temperature is the molecules movements why do you get burnt by one and don't feel force and feel force by the other? Does it have to do with elastic and non elastic collisions with the surroundings?
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 9 лет назад
+Johannes Almborg Ok, so you're right that temperature is the motion of molecules and pressure is those molecules bumping into each other (and walls of containers and so on). These are two completely different ideas though. Yes, the molecules have to move to bump into each other, but it's not the motion /itself/ that creates pressure ...only the force during the bump. Pressure and temperature are sometimes related (one can go up as a /result/ of the other one going up), but that doesn't mean they're the same thing. In fact, sometimes temperature can go up /without/ pressure going up (volume goes up instead). We get burnt because *our* molecules can only move so much without chemical changes happening. A burn is a chemical change in your skin due to excess molecular motion. If you touch something hot, it has a lot of molecular motion in it and that can transfer to you through contact. Pressure, on the other hand, is about how hard the molecules are pushing, not how fast they're moving. Hope this clears things up.
@johannes7110
@johannes7110 9 лет назад
+The Science Asylum An example. You have a gas. what can exist in the gas? From what I understand the only thing that can exist is motion of the particles that make up the gas. So how do we derive the two man made units pressure and temperature? particles can bump in to stuff: like your finger, a surface or a probe. if the bump is like a rubber ball (the collision is called elastic) the particle bounce of the surface with the same speed but opposite direction as the particle had when moving towards the surface. This particle gives a force to the surface. We call that pressure. Heat is when the particle that smashes in to the surface like a wet ball of clay(the collision is called non-elastic). The surface is given all the energy of the particle and we precive this energy as heat. The thing with this is that you should still experience some sort of pressure from the gas even if the collision is non-elastic. So we can have pressure without heat but not heat without pressure? A solid object has some kind of retaining forces that make the particles adhere to become the object. Otherwise the same things apply. is this correct?
@JorgeFalconOnline
@JorgeFalconOnline 4 года назад
19~21c
@tejasmallikarjun8896
@tejasmallikarjun8896 6 лет назад
why is temperature constant at boiling point or melting point
@sudhanshubariar3894
@sudhanshubariar3894 4 года назад
If temperature is average kinetic energy of molecules of a matter then why its unit is Kelvin or celcius why not joule ?????? Please reply
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 4 года назад
1. When we first started measuring temperature, we didn't realize it was related to energy. 2. As you said, it's the _average_ KE, not the total KE. Measuring it in joules might get them confused.
@sudhanshubariar3894
@sudhanshubariar3894 4 года назад
@@ScienceAsylum Thanks
@StarcraftTurk
@StarcraftTurk 2 года назад
Good question
@FlatzoidsPerspective
@FlatzoidsPerspective 3 года назад
Love your videos man subbed! Would love to see you explain entropy hehe and that’s a joke because you just did lol
@tmdrake
@tmdrake 6 лет назад
This dragon likes his temp at 80 F....nice and toasty!
@sjoerdwiesmeijer7231
@sjoerdwiesmeijer7231 5 лет назад
I LOVE these videos!
@AnnoyingNewslettersPage6
@AnnoyingNewslettersPage6 2 года назад
I am kind of on board with you with the ideal temperature. I'll go with a little hotter on a windy day or in a windy area like by a lake, but in general I'll go for a little cooler so I can put on a flannel or something instead of being drenched in sweat because it's too hot. I've been stationed in the tundra of Fort wainwright, fairbanks, Alaska, which at the time the temperatures in winter time were 20° to -20° fahrenheit, not counting any wind chill, and it was also a dry cold then. I've also been stationed at Fort irwin, barstow, Mojave desert, bordering on Death Valley, California, we're temperatures would reach 120° Fahrenheit. And I would much rather be in the cold, where I can get warm or prevent getting cold in the first place, just by my choice of clothing, than somewhere hot, where the only recourse is air conditioning.
@Reddogovereasy
@Reddogovereasy 6 лет назад
If light does not have a temperature, that sort of makes sense, what is infrared light? How does infrared light create heat?
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 6 лет назад
Infrared light is just the light emitted by things at normal everyday temperatures (like our body temperature). If you get things hot enough, like an incandescent light bulb, they'll emit visible light instead.
@palmereldritch7822
@palmereldritch7822 5 лет назад
tricky part about all this "temperature" stuff for me is how one apply term "kinetic energy" to quantum object. What kinetic energy electron can have? Is this even right question? It is a wave after all. Ok, I can ask this about nuclei. At least it is not wave. Or is it? What is this moment, when molecule "absorb" quant of energy wich encrease it's kinetic energy? Or all this works some other way? How exactly termal energy flows from one molecule to another? Don't know answer on any of this questions.
@piyushchandra4758
@piyushchandra4758 2 года назад
Hi Nick! You say, "light doesn't have temperature" and "without matter, the concept of temperature doesn't even make sense". Then how come CMB and black holes have temperature associated with them? Thank you!
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 2 года назад
It helps to think of the CMB as the measurement we take of the average temperature of the _matter_ in the universe. As for black holes, we don't actually understand that one. We know the light emitted (Hawking radiation) tells us what the temperature value is, but we don't understand _why_ it has temperature.
@MarlandoCrosdale
@MarlandoCrosdale 3 года назад
I love the explanation for the most part but it kinda had me questioning my definition of temperature, only to find out that my definition was exactly what you said. But I don’t blame you I blame science.
@thesniperofcs
@thesniperofcs 2 года назад
I still don’t understand how it gets cold it winter time
@wisdom1966
@wisdom1966 3 года назад
Thanks , i was finding the answer & i got
@enriquegarciacota3914
@enriquegarciacota3914 2 года назад
Ok an average movement per molecule is a good short definition, thanks
@anthonymack2270
@anthonymack2270 3 года назад
Bro thank you so much. Took me an hour to find this information. I actually had to search "quantum temperature" 🤦‍♂️
@sadbucket
@sadbucket Год назад
So why don't we just measure kinetic energy in Joules/mol?
@nokian9005
@nokian9005 3 года назад
All jokes and memes aside, my favorite temperature of all time is 69 degrees F. Seriously. While driving, I always gravitate towards 69 degrees in my AC because it's not too hot nor too cold- it just feels perfect. Weirdly though, 69 MPH is also my favorite speed to drive at on the freeway- it's neither too fast nor too slow. It just feels "right". I am also getting close to 69k miles in my vehicle, so I'm excited for that.
@kafuuchino3236
@kafuuchino3236 3 года назад
One thing I'm still a little confused by - sure, temperature is the average kinetic energy per molecule, not counting the large-scale kinetic energy of things those molecules make up. But how big does a molecule have to be before its motions aren't part of temperature? It seems to me that a room full of perfectly elastic tennis balls (insert "Physics laaaaaand!" jingle here) in a vacuum in orbit around Earth (so no effect from gravity) would behave like a box of gas molecules in the ideal gas law. Yet it doesn't seem right to say the motions of those tennis balls are part of "temperature," even if their behaviour is more or less the same as molecules, just on a larger scale. But if not tennis balls, what about... marbles? Sand grains? Dust specks? Cells? Mitochondria? Ribosomes? Viruses? Protein molecules? Amino acids? Water molecules? Atoms? Atoms yes, marbles no. Where along that size hierarchy does motion stop being part of an object's temperature? If I say my liver (for example) is at a temperature of 37 degrees Celsius, I'm saying the molecules in it are moving around with a certain average kinetic energy. But what molecules are we talking about? Water molecules and other small molecules like amino acids, yes. What about larger molecules like proteins? Long strands of DNA? Entire chromosomes? After all, a chromosome does contain one really long molecule of DNA. How about the ribosomes in the liver cells, or any viruses that may be infecting them? I'm pretty sure we're not talking about my liver cells as a whole, and definitely not my entire liver! So where do we draw the line?
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 3 года назад
This is a great question! Thermal energy is generally considered to be only be motion on the molecule/atom level. Nothing larger and nothing smaller should be considered "thermal energy." Practically speaking though, it's a bit more subjective. If we're _measuring_ temperature, I bet motions on a slightly larger scale would still contribute to that measured temperature. It would be tough to draw a clear boundary on scale. Some things are definitely too big. Some things are definitely too small. But the things in-between are in a grey area.
@kafuuchino3236
@kafuuchino3236 3 года назад
​@@ScienceAsylum I understand that, but I'm confused as to where you'd draw the size line between "small enough to be considered a molecule" and "too big, not a molecule." Single atoms of noble gases? Yes. Water? Yes. Glucose and amino acids on their own? Presumably yes. But what about big molecules like buckyballs? Long polymers? Huge biomolecules like DNA or enzymes, are they considered single molecules as far as thermal energy is concerned and their kinetic energy does contribute to temperature, like water molecules, or composite bodies made of many smaller molecules that don't contribute to temperature as a whole, like you? A chromosome is a single DNA double helix wrapped around histone proteins. If we unwrap it and stretch it out straight, it'd be a centimetre long. Is that one molecule? Biochemists would say yes, but does the kinetic energy of that whole chromosome contribute to temperature (like a water molecule) or is it considered a big complex structure made of smaller molecules that contribute to temperature individually, like cells, people or planets? How do you designate what a "molecule" is in a giant covalent crystal lattice like silicon dioxide/quartz, glass or other minerals? Or metal structures, where the atoms' outer shells overlap, the electrons are delocalised over the whole structure, and a whole chunk of metal is basically one big molecule? I'm guessing the individual atoms in a metal count as the "molecules" that carry the kinetic energy - but delocalised electrons hold a benzene ring together too. Why is one benzene ring considered a single molecule, while an iron knife (for example) is not? If temperature was only about atoms, I'd get it - atoms are unambiguous structures. But "molecules" are just groups of atoms bonded together, and I'm wondering how big that bonded group has to be before it no longer counts as a molecule and its kinetic energy is considered mechanical work for a composite object rather than thermal motion.
@johnny_pilot
@johnny_pilot Год назад
What I just don't get is: why am I sitting here indoors in 17C on the thermometer in November all wrapped up in order to keep warm, yet I can actually sunbathe in 17C outdoor temperatures in late March? WTF?
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum Год назад
The human temperature sense is wild, isn't it?
@soliton4
@soliton4 6 лет назад
when water transitions from liquid to solid, the internal thermal engery reduces a lot. its the equivalent difference in thermal energy to water cooling from 80 degrees c to 0 degrees c. and yet it happens all at about the same temperature. so i am not completely convinced by this average explanation. ps: i just saw lost in space and got turned off by the quick freeze plot hole
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 6 лет назад
Except a phase transition doesn't require a temperature change. Thermal energy and temperature are not the same thing. Thermal energy is kinetic energy (what we call temperature) and _also_ potential energy (related to the bonds between molecules). It's the potential energy that changes during a phase transition.
@AlokKumar-ps1pm
@AlokKumar-ps1pm 6 лет назад
I love your videos because we understand esliye
@llerradish
@llerradish 2 года назад
81 degrees Fahrenheit or 27 to 30 degrees Celsius
@god3597
@god3597 4 года назад
What is heat and whats the difference between temperature and heat?
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 4 года назад
Temperature is related to the energy an object currently has. Heat is just the _transfer_ of energy from one place/object to another. It can only be called "heat" while it's in transit.
@michaelgalario6655
@michaelgalario6655 2 года назад
I am baffled by the concept of kinetic energy and potential energy. On which lense are we going to view and define it? Micro-level or macro-level? Generally, it is said that K.E. is energy in motion and P.E. is energy at rest. However Kinetic Molecular Theory states that "matter is made up of particles that are constantly moving." Solid matter for example, at a macro-level, can be observed having K.E. if it's moving, and P.E. if it's not. However, what we don't see at the micro-level are the particles which are always in motion (vibratory motion for atoms and even the electrons itself are in motion) even if the solid matter being observed appears not to be moving. Just want to know if there are any clear-cut explanations and/or definition with regard to how the K.E. should be understood or studied? Thinking about KMT, it gives me the impression that P.E. seems inexistent. Thanks
@tanujashinde9895
@tanujashinde9895 5 лет назад
This is wonderful.
@SpiritOfTheMist
@SpiritOfTheMist 6 лет назад
You said average to many times in this video (just kidding, your channel is awesome)
@workhardism
@workhardism 4 года назад
So your saying this vid was "Well above average" in more ways then one. :D
@Zebes61
@Zebes61 6 лет назад
These videos aren't so popular because most youtubers prefer more silly things than lucidly crazy things.
@vinceanthony7046
@vinceanthony7046 7 лет назад
My favorite temperature is 20-23.33 celcius.
@SaquibFaisal
@SaquibFaisal 4 года назад
Hey Nick! I watched a video on liquid helium. They showed that liquid helium climbed over and escaped the container. My question is, when it was climbing it had to do work against gravity. So where that energy is coming from to make it climb the wall? Second question: Where do you take such silly questions? On YT comment section or some other platform?
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 4 года назад
1) I don’t know 🤷‍♂️ I’d have to research it. 2) Here in the comments is definitely the best place 👍
@NitramGTi
@NitramGTi 2 года назад
Sounds like superfluidity.
@DANGJOS
@DANGJOS 4 года назад
@The Science Asylum Isn't there something missing here? Isn't it the average translational kinetic energy? Rotational and vibrational states add to the average kinetic energy, but not to the temperature. But they do increase the heat capacity; that is the amount of energy required to change the temperature by a certain amount.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 4 года назад
If temperature was only related to translational kinetic energy, then solids wouldn't have temperature.
@DANGJOS
@DANGJOS 4 года назад
@@ScienceAsylum But then how do you explain adding a certain amount of energy to oxygen gas and its temperature rising less than neon gas's temperature does. They both have the same amount of energy added, but different temperatures because of rotational states storing that energy in a non-translational form. I'll read my physics book again also, because maybe I misunderstood.
@DANGJOS
@DANGJOS 4 года назад
@@ScienceAsylum So I checked one of my physics books. It's called the *theorem of equipartition of energy.* It relates the average translational kinetic energy in three directions/dimensions to the temperature. Vibrational states and rotational states are not included. This is for an ideal gas. And if I remember correctly from my statistical thermodynamics/mechanics class, solids also have a sort of translational kinetic energy in three directions as well, except it's back and forth as an oscillator. This is why monatomic solids, like iron, have a heat capacity of about 25. It's Avogadro's number times Boltzmann's constant (8.3) for each dimension. Perhaps for solids it's the vibrational states for each molecule that contributes to extra heat capacity, but not directly to temperature. Rather the total motion of the entire molecule in the solid gives the temperature.
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 4 года назад
The reason adding thermal energy to something doesn't always increase the temperature is because thermal energy isn't just kinetic energy. It's _also_ *potential* energy. There is potential energy between the molecules in the substance and some of the energy goes there. Heat capacity is just a simple way of measuring the proportion that goes to potential vs kinetic. If more goes to potential, then less goes to kinetic and the temperature increase is smaller. This is the same reason that a phase change results in _zero_ increase in temperature. All the energy goes to potential during a phase change.
@DANGJOS
@DANGJOS 4 года назад
@@ScienceAsylum This is turning into a semantics issue. If you want to refer to rotational states and vibrational states as potential energy, then fine. Some may consider that kinetic energy. In the particular physics book (Serway-Jewett) I'm referring to, they make a distinction to call it *translational kinetic energy* because rotational states aren't included. Again, this is just semantics anyway, so it doesn't really matter. I wouldn't say that phase changes are entirely the same thing, although I understand what you're saying. Phase changes have to do with forming and breaking bonds, which I think everyone can agree is a change in potential energy. It's pretty clear there, but the issue in the above paragraph is less clear to me.
@skharris8
@skharris8 4 года назад
Bro we have the same towel. Great video though, that wasn't my only takeaway haha
@mukeshchand5301
@mukeshchand5301 5 лет назад
Mind blowing.
@truthphilic7938
@truthphilic7938 3 года назад
Sir, will you publish a video about Degrees of freedom? I find this item confusing
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 3 года назад
I talk about them a little in my video on Lagrangian Mechanics: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-MIBfKJHMWHU.html
@truthphilic7938
@truthphilic7938 3 года назад
@@ScienceAsylum thanks, sir Nick.
@sagarsharma-qf1hs
@sagarsharma-qf1hs 9 лет назад
Hey Nick I have been struggling to grasp a concept and I am sure you would be able to help me...It is a known fact that electricity is flow of electron. So if current is flowing from a conduction, say, a copper wire which has 29 electrons. So there are 29 electrons inside copper atom which makes up the conducting wire...So if electricity is flow of electron than definitely there must be some source from which this electron are coming from....what is that source?? and why doesn't that source run out of electron after it is used...If the source is the copper own electron which is flowing to do the work why is it that a time doesn't come where copper has no more electron which it can allow to flow as electric current...Sorry for big and confusing question but i m sure you would have understood the essence of my question...
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 9 лет назад
sagar sharma This is a very good question, which I'll be answering in a video soon (hopefully). It's the electrons in the copper wire that move around. The power source does not provide electrons. It provides energy. That's all. Once the electrons have energy, they fall from high energy (one end of a battery) to low energy (the other end of the battery). The wires never run out of electrons. The power source just runs out of the energy to move them.
@sagarsharma-qf1hs
@sagarsharma-qf1hs 9 лет назад
***** Oh thank you so much sir for answering it!!
@sagarsharma-qf1hs
@sagarsharma-qf1hs 9 лет назад
***** A video? Wow i cannot wait to see you make a video around this topic..
@adeshpoz1167
@adeshpoz1167 6 лет назад
The Science Asylum How come they can never run out of electrons? They have finite electrons for sure. Maybe the number is extremely large and hard to empty.☺
@julianr3830
@julianr3830 6 лет назад
Anup Pandey Electricity can only flow in a closed circuit so the electrons just Go around
@sagarsharma-qf1hs
@sagarsharma-qf1hs 9 лет назад
02:06 "Voice of reason" Hahahahahaha cant stop laughing
@deno265
@deno265 8 лет назад
Does adding temperatures makes sense ? example 100 + 100 =? [DEGREES CELSISUS]
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 8 лет назад
Yes, it makes sense. You can add anything like that as long as it has no direction (which includes temperature).
@AlexandarHullRichter
@AlexandarHullRichter 2 года назад
My ideal temperature is always 98.6°F.
@deenadayalanperumal1982
@deenadayalanperumal1982 7 лет назад
temperature is average kinetic energy...then is temperature times number of molecules in the system is its total energy?
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 7 лет назад
That would probably be on the correct order of magnitude (power of ten), but it wouldn't be exact. Also, it wouldn't be the total energy, it would just be the total random kinetic energy. There's a lot more energy in those particles than just random kinetic energy.
@Fartalot3000
@Fartalot3000 5 лет назад
Nick, what is the temperature if it is 0 degrees Celsius times 2? Or 10 degrees Celsius times 2? Is there a way to calculate that?
@ScienceAsylum
@ScienceAsylum 5 лет назад
I would only use operations like multiplication or division on the Kelvin scale. It's the only scale that makes physical sense.
Далее
What the HECK is Energy?
7:59
Просмотров 358 тыс.
What is Temperature?
16:37
Просмотров 19 тыс.
What is Physical Information?
9:53
Просмотров 203 тыс.
Molecular Temperature & Degrees of Freedom
14:10
Просмотров 119 тыс.
What is Temperature?
21:53
Просмотров 25 тыс.
How Hot Can It Get?
10:03
Просмотров 21 млн
The "Bowling Ball in a Boat" Paradox
8:05
Просмотров 245 тыс.
What the HECK is Mass?
7:41
Просмотров 313 тыс.
What *is* a photon?
23:22
Просмотров 194 тыс.
What is Heat? (Thermal Physics)
8:24
Просмотров 30 тыс.
What Are Gravitational Waves?
5:39
Просмотров 130 тыс.