What Happens To The Animals I Don't Eat? | An Ethical Dilemma | IIT Madras | Q & A | Lecture 

👋

*Create a Better 🌎 and a Better You by.................Living Vegan* 💜

@@LouisGedo 🙏👶🙏

vegens are killing plants, don't they?

Became a patreon member. 🙌

Good point.

She's just putting up a what aboutery argument

Vegetable and grain agriculture lands are also created from deforestation and murdering of animals. These vegans are eating the same vegetables and grains cultivated in the lands that were the created on the expense of animals life, birds life , insects life,...etc..😊😊😊😊

wht=ats wrong with u.U wnt to extint animal life.why do u think they feel pain

@@munirajc3575 Go stand behind a horse, stick a pin in it and then see how much it feels pain. Extinct???? Humans artificially breed all these animals. They are not in nature. Of course they should be extinct. Listen to the video. Arvind explained it all.

Yeah In every case when human enter the nature and disturb it We lost a whole species

We do consume horses in russia.

​@@HOPE-jn2ufhumans eat horses but not in India but in western countries they eat horses

It's wrong . Some species are going to extinct because of climate change. Humans should eat animals to maintain conditions of nature. ~ (Average non vegan religious scientific clown )

Google the Biomass of Humans, livestock and Wildlife.

wht=ats wrong with u.U wnt to extint animal life.why do u think they feel pain

wht=ats wrong with u.U wnt to extint animal life.why do u think they feel pain

Great and lowly are RELATIVE. 😉 Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱

Better answer will be they will not be extinct just like dogs and cat they will continue to be around in limited number

@@Rollinstrikepackagebravo do you people even know there is a word called domesticated? they wont survive the wild they have been domesticated. you fools are comparing wild life with domesticated animals.

@@praveenpayiran You are making a fool of urself by posting this non sense comment.. I never said they could live in the wild.. yes they are domesticated animals so they will live in the village families just like pets in limited numbers.. they won't go extinct and they shouldn't be force bred, tortured, exploited and killed for our desires.. don't know what's so hard to understand this?

@@praveenpayiran Domesticated and created for food are fairly different things my friend....would be good if you posted some good questions for a debate here and also to get us thinking like the questions the girl asked!

@@Rollinstrikepackagebravo yes

Thank you for providing me with my daily LAUGH! 😂 Incidentally, are you VEGAN? 🌱

@@JagadguruSvamiVegananda I meant Greatest Of All Time and not the animal as it's clearly understood. And yes rooting for veganism 🌱

@@snehasiva1042 In your own words, define “VEGANISM”. ☝️🤔☝️

wht=ats wrong with u.U wnt to extint animal life.why do u think they feel pain

There are TWO reasons why vegans comprise a fraction of one percent of the population: The main reason is due to humans’ failure to care about what they put into their own bodies - as long as it tastes good, who gives a damn about the consequences to one’s own health, or to the ethical concerns regarding other creatures or the environment? The other reason is due to vegan advocates and animal rights activists being inept in their understanding of morality, as well as their abysmal grasp of human physiology. Almost every single vegan activist I know of, wrongly believes that we are omnivores, and they are CLUELESS in respect to metaethics and applied ethics. However, this is not the most unfortunate thing about the matter. The saddest thing is, that there is hardly a single vegan activist willing to spend even a single hour or so, in order to study proper diet and meta-ethics with the current World Teacher Himself, Jagadguru Svāmī Vegānanda, despite him freely offering to do so on his social media platforms. 😩

😇अहिंसा परमो धर्म 😇 ahiṃsā paramo dharma (“non-harm is the HIGHEST religious principle” or “non-violence is the GREATEST law”). Therefore, only a strict VEGAN can claim to be an adherent of the eternal religion (sanātana dharma).🌱

Ridiculous statement.

Also ED WINTERS

@@prabsyadav9222 Indeed, Mr. Edward “Winters” Gaunt’s understanding of metaethics is beyond reproach, which explains why he condones the MURDER of poor, innocent humans before they have the opportunity to even see the light of day. 👶 The fact that he repeatedly asserts that “humans are animals”, shows what an abject hypocrite is that MURDEROUS sinner. 😩 Furthermore, it is debatable whether Ed is truly vegan in his outlook, since he recently stated on the national television programme, GBNews, that he believes we ought NOT ban animal agriculture! “I’m not even saying that we should ban meat, dairy and eggs right now”. Mr. Ed Gaunt, So-called “VEGAN” activist. 😐 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Sl5GpxLXnuI.html Go to the 8:15 mark.

Thanks a lot. Truly appreciate the support 🙏

2 time biriyani ka intezaam ho gya bhai ka😋

If possible help Almighty animal sanctuary also sir Sai Vignesh is also an animal activist who had rescued many animals . Thank you

There are TWO reasons why vegans comprise a fraction of one percent of the population: The main reason is due to humans’ failure to care about what they put into their own bodies - as long as it tastes good, who gives a damn about the consequences to one’s own health, or to the ethical concerns regarding other creatures or the environment? The other reason is due to vegan advocates and animal rights activists being inept in their understanding of morality, as well as their abysmal grasp of human physiology. Almost every single vegan activist I know of, wrongly believes that we are omnivores, and they are CLUELESS in respect to metaethics and applied ethics. However, this is not the most unfortunate thing about the matter. The saddest thing is, that there is hardly a single vegan activist willing to spend even a single hour or so, in order to study proper diet and meta-ethics with the current World Teacher Himself, Jagadguru Svāmī Vegānanda, despite him freely offering to do so on his social media platforms. 😩

All farm animals must be released for rewilding. Aravind is an idiot to support anti natalist sentiment

Stating that - under certain circumstances - non-existence is preferable to existence - is not anti-natalism but simply common sense. For example, in the case of a child that is physically and mentally abused and then murdered, surely no one believes it is "better" that this child existed (even if it experienced some periods of happiness during its life)

@@MrGeekUSA I don't disagree with what you said. I say his argument seemed anti-natalistic because he subscribes to extinction, which is the end goal of anti-natalism. More importantly, it needs to be looked at from a conversational perspective, not as an individual statement. She: "What if the animals go extinct?" Him: "Let them be extinct; because ..." Regardless of the reason, he’s essentially saying: I ask you to have compassion and empathy for the animals and stop eating them so that their entire species will be eradicated from the face of the earth. It's not remotely appealing, to say the least. As a vegan (and an optimist?), I personally am not okay with extinction. Let's say that in the future, with the concerted efforts of vegans and vegan allies, evolved consciousness, and food innovation such as lab-grown meat, animal agriculture declines, and so does breeding. Do you think a vegan world, with its compassion for non-human animals, would let these species go extinct? There are sanctuaries right now that support farm animals. As she herself noted, people could adopt them. Maybe one day we'll have chickens, pigs, or cows as mainstream companion animals like dogs or cats. All of this is to say, extinction might not even be a reality, so why even say it? Especially since it’s not helping the conversation. From her introduction, I could see she was aligned with the vegan message. All she wanted was a little hope or assurance that her being vegan matters and helps these poor animals. I'm not sure if this conversation particularly helped with that. It's not just about facts or "common sense". People are not mere rational machines. Assuming otherwise shows a lack of empathy. How could it have turned out better? For starters, don't play into the "farm animals would be wiped out with veganism" trope. One of the stronger arguments, in my opinion, would be to highlight that animal agriculture is a leading cause of deforestation, resulting in habitat loss and accelerating the mass extinction of wild animals.

wht=ats wrong with u.U wnt to extint animal life.why do u think they feel pain

Because human brain gets scared when its pleasures or the things giving it pleasure seem to be in danger. It sees it as a danger and prepare responses.The other most important thing is not being a victim ourselves.

You simply mean nobody should have children

@@shivanandayalpi5617 you missed the point

@@Nature-s7g that's also a point.. seems you missed something important

@@shivanandayalpi5617 My friend, could you please tell me which important point I missed?

Absolutely ❤

She is acting childish

It's at IIT Madras

Patrick Babboumian, Nimai Delgado, Anastasia Zinchenko, Torre Washington, Zack Belknap, Brian Turner, Greg Lachance, Max Seabrook have already proven what you want Arvind to prove.

If they're capable to proliferate on their own, they would.. else they die..

Forest are destroyed by us monsters

@@lachimolalala6180 true

Do you know why - freedom is more important than living......

Domestic animals can't live in forest though

@@pranjalarora3193 then where they live.....

😇अहिंसा परमो धर्म 😇 ahiṃsā paramo dharma (“non-harm is the HIGHEST religious principle” or “non-violence is the GREATEST law”). Therefore, only a strict VEGAN can claim to be an adherent of the eternal religion (sanātana dharma).🌱

Torturing someone is sin

How?

That's not the point here ! Not all cows give this much milk only few breeds I.e indian hump cows give this much and in dairy industry if 12 litter is produced then not even 0.1 litre is given to male calf.thats the problem and btw how will the cow give birth? When u will impregnate her forcefully and u hv no right to do this! That's rape and abuse of nature

If u can make sure that cow and her child is not suffering and the cow is impregnated naturally then u may drink all the milk. No problem man ! Vegans are not stupid they just care about other creatures that why they want every one to change! Vegans are savior of nature❤

@@Nikunj-ch6pm Do you allow it in a human. No absolutely no, then why are you commenting foolishnes. Just accept that it is the part of food chain. You are just conserving his vegan thoughts.

these lunatics dont know how much a calf drinks and what will happen if they were let to drink the entire milk.

@@lachimolalala6180 see america and europe the so called vegans are stupid they will not agree with you they have been given an agenda and trained you can see them repeat the exact same lines and questions around the world its more like a cult