If you believe in these ‘scientists,’ we truly are doomed as a species. Jesus tap dancing Christ. Save us, please! Anyone! Superman? Batman? Catwoman? PLEASE?
@browhat4008 Because people wouldn’t pay ungodly amounts of money for their cancer to disappear? Use your brain and let some air under that tinfoil hat
It's takes decades of research and testing between finding a discovery, and turning it into a safe method of treatment for humans. And along the way, they might find that it won't work for myriad reasons.
Usually the organizations funding a particular research own the rights to whatever was discovered. If what was discovered turns out to be less profitable than what’s currently used, it’s shelved indefinitely. This is also part of why approaches like diet and fasting aren’t highly supported by professional research despite their continually reported effectiveness. There’s no profit in it.
@@AegisAuras That's the most retarded thing I have ever heard, straight from Reddit I presume? Why treating cancer is so hard is because there is no such thing as THE cancer, all humans who develop and suffer from cancer are in a unique case. There is no kill all treatment in ever evolving disease. Countries around the globe are pouring billions into cancer research, there is no profitability in cancer treatment. The people funding are not looking for profitability, it doesn't exist. Also people up high controlling the money and where it flows also get cancer and die to cancer quite frequently, they are not getting some special shelved doses because they don't exist. Go outside, breath fresh air instead of rotting your brain making video game content, might be less retarded. Cancer is malfunctioning cells, there is no diet that kills malfunctioning cells. To properly treat cancer, you need to somehow kill all the malfunctionig cells without killing the good ones. That is an incredibly tall task. Do tell me about this killswitch diet that executes all the correct malfunctioning cells Absolute chimp brain, they teach how cancer works in elementary school.
because test trials dont get too human stages, we currently have one that works for aids and cancer at the same time but its only worked on about 3 people so far.
Because stupid people like think all cancer are similar, it is not like that. There is not ONE cure for cancer there exist as many cures as different cancer exist...
I have lost my cousin sister just 15 days ago. She was such a fighter, battling breast cancer for the past 18 years. She was 30 at the time of her death. God willing, let us pray that this study finds a real cure for cancer. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
The thing is, breakthroughs are just… breakthroughs. Like this one, it isn’t a solution, it’s just a way to maybe cure cancer, they aren’t even sure about it yet. So of course it won’t happen any time soon.
I agree. I think that most discoveries like this should get fast track status from the FDA. But, unfortunately, most do not, and they linger in the clinical trial world never to be heard from again unless the end result is a drug, ready for market, sometimes decades later. I have Waldenstroms Syndrome. It is a non-hodgkins lymphoma that attacks the blood cells. It is not curable, but it is treatable. It is a rare form of blood cancer only effecting 3000 people a year in the US. Two treatments that are afforded to me is a BTK inhibitor (Brukinsa) and the other is (Rituximab) a monoconial antibody therapy. Without getting "wonky" in terms of their explanation and modality, Burkinsa, interferes with the communication of the cancer cells, via Burtons Tyrosine Kinase and prevents them from multiplying. The other, Rituximab, seeks out the surface of the cancer cell, identified as CD-20 and let's the immune system know that it needs destroying. Both of these drugs are very cutting edge pharmaceuticals that employ a stop gap measure within cancer cells by destroying their communication and replication. However, even though I have the latest and greatest for my particular malady, I am in my eighth month of therapy and still, I am not close to turning the corner in terms of at least a temporary remission. As I have said, WM is treatable, not curable. Once I do get some sort of relief, it can, and will, raise its ugly head again in the future. In addition, these treatments are not cheap. A sixty day supply of Burkinsa for example is 12,000 dollars. Rituximab is close to 25,000 dollars for one infusion. I am thankful I have insurance. But for those who don't, cost will be a barrier to access. Another problem that will have to be addressed for those who are afflicted and don't have the resources. Money, unfortunately, gets in the way of everything. To summarize, I believe that in my opinion, there is no "one" kill switch for cancer. Each comes with its own different "electrical system" Finding and targeting those differences effectively has been a medical challenge for decades now. While we have come a long way with the pharmaceutical end of treating the big "C", I think the future of a.possible cure for most, if not all cancers is through DNA engineering. Finding the defective genetic code that causes a particular cancer (in my case it is MYD88 LS65P) correct that code, and being permanent relief to the patient. While there is progress on that front, it is still a long way, away...
These people are creating hazards for humanity. Anyone who understands this would not want to risk the consequences. Yet they keep going it’s just a matter of time before these idiots let a deadly outbreak for trying to solve answers we don’t have capacity to. How many diseases have they created and they masked it by saying we found a solution? These liars will wipe out humanity.
@@Bretaxyis there a need to write such comment? Do you have a heart or any empathy at all? There are certain things unknown to us, and even you don't have answers in your pocket. What I do know is that you should be ashamed for writing this comment. Have a good day
That is strange. My co-worker at the university we worked in was part of a study that used the HeLa line of cancer cells that were sent to the space station. Their research found the cancer cells slowed down replication in zero gravity but when brought back to earth’s gravity, began to replicate like normal.
They do say in the video that this cancer was not restrained by surrounding tissue, so possibly the opposite is true when it is surrounded with tissue? Just a guess
@@TheFallen-xi2irwhy would they? If the cells aid in the development of curing a disease that killed her it’s stupid for the family to disagree with what they did.
This makes you realise how important it is to invest in space travel and exploration. By doing so, you're effectively advancing humanity in all other areas as well. So no, it is not a waste to invest in space just because we have "other priorities."
Fine we can go to space. But we do not need to go to the moon. And we absolutely do not need to go to Mars. A planet which has nothing waiting for us on it but death. Also, while I’m at it, if you knew anything about space exploration? You would know the insane amounts of greenhouse gases that each engine releases every launch. Effectively making the problem worse at home while “trying to save us.” 🤦♂️
My mother was diagnosed with cancer... After five years of treatment, cancer came back unexpectedly spreading to most of the internal organs... When the doctor told me that they are helpless now and it's the palliative care next, my first thought was, if we can send people to space or have successful lunar and even mars missions, why can't we find a cure for this deadly disease... I was actually angry with the world...
Bro why are u comparing health industry and space ? 2 different subject. Yes they also works for it .but they also trying to find solutions ,maybe it can be harder than making civilisation on Mars. u don't need to be angry for that .
@@jedaaayou’re right in a way about it being a whole bunch of different diseases but you’re also wrong when you said there’s no cure. We can treat all different types of cancer and lots of people go into remission and beat cancer everyday sure it could come back but it doesn’t always and if healthcare was better a hell of a lot more people would beat it obviously you can’t save everyone but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try
why was this discovered in 2013 and is just now being released as new information? why havent there been clinical trials in the last 11 years? or was the fact that big pharma wouldnt let this pass
big pharma intentionally never provides cures... big pharma makes more money when people are unhealthy which means only the billionaires in the right social circles receive any cures.
We are all happy but lets not hope this is a cover up on the many scientists that have been killed, because they already found a cure to cancer, and now they running this story like "they" discovered it. Slowly we might realize they have the answers to everything but only revieal them when necessary. I do believe everything they say, but i hope they dont claim it as their own discovery. Or that the many stories of scientists getting killed dont overshadows this research if this is a true legit discovery. I dont know what to believe anymore. I just want good for humanity, but so many fishy things are going on if you dig down to it.... peace
@@Piss_Off_Plz Even though the bible describes exactly how we see and view the Earth. Motionless and flat. Hmm. You carry on believing fairytale fron NASA who are not only known liars, but everything they do is debunked 🤡😂
Interesting: in the movie ‘Contact’, the wealthy industrialist Hadden tells Dr Arroway that he’s living at the Mir space station because ‘it’s keeping the cancer from eating him alive’
So in the movie Contact, when S.R. Hadden goes to the MIR space station because of his cancer, he might have just exacerbated his cancer’s progression.
Ha.. interesting... im so glad theres people like you in this world cuz i never thought of that 😊 ... it does make the science in the movie dated a bit now.
@@restart426 Hadden was basically Carl Sagan writing himself into the story as if he was a billionaire... very heart touching moment in the movie if ur a sagan fan 😢😊
*Hallelujah!!!! The daily jesus devotional has been a huge part of my transformation, God is good 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻was owning a loan of $47,000 to the bank for my son's brain surgery (David), Now I'm no longer in debt after I invested $12,000 and got my payout of m $270,500 every months,God bless Chloe Linda Henderson🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸..*
After I raised up to 325k trading with her I bought a new House and a car here in the states 🇺🇸🇺🇸 also paid for my son's surgery (Oscar). Glory to God.shalom.
You should watch. The reason they believed it went out of control because of the removal of microgravity, and there shouldn't be a ton or radiation in the ship or making it through the bag I wish they had more to say, tho. The topic is actually an interesting one, and all the on/off switches the body has a lot of potential just waiting to be worked
So considering that we used to have 2 1/2 atmospheres we would have been an exceedingly lot healthier, perhaps we should protect our own atmosphere, even though it is only one atmosphere.
The contribution of the atmosphere towards gravity on a planet is tiny. Which is what was effecting the rate of cancer. A lack of gravity. I'd say poor nutrition, rushed vaccines and an increasingly sedentary lifestyle have a lot more to do with why people are less healthy.
I would not. I mean if you cannot be treated for example you have nothing to loose, except maybe dying a few days prior, probably not even that much because a trip to space is normally not a few days but a few minutes or so. Why loose the last chance to see space if you will die whatever you do? I would do it the experience is worth more i think.
If anyone remembers the movie Contact, written by Carl Sagan, with Jodie Foster in it. Her facilitator, the billionaire Hadden, lives in space to beat cancer (they cited a NASA research to prove that cancer slows down/stops in microgravity).
Well if it was real life, he just fu¢ked up, because the scientists are saying according to this, that it speeds up and grows rapidly. So he would probably be dead in a week. What there saying is they can still take this research and possibly still find a cure. Hopefully they do. 3 people in my street all died in the same month 2 years ago, and one only found out she had cancer 5 weeks before she died. She went to the doctor's to ask for something to help her sleep because her sore back was stopping her get a decent sleep. She only started to get a sore back 2 weeks before she went to the doctor's about it thinking she pulled something. So even if she went to the doctor's about it when the pain started, she would have still been to late to save her life. She was only 51. Cancer the word alone scares me.
@@Matt92Machine nasa is science fiction and works for the devil to try to hide Gods biblical flat earth and to try to prove Gods word the bible wrong and try .to prove there is no Jesus aka Gods son......
Wow, this is amazing. We need more videos like this for those" why do we need to explore space we have enough problem on earth" folks. This is why explore space.
@@juntus89 if u wanna speak about education it’s had not has. Also gene editing, the humane genome, measuring the universe, Higgs Boson, tons of medical breakthroughs. U may want to go back to sleep.
Gravity? What about the massive energy/spectrum of energies going through the cell? Increases in gamma, x-ray, UVA, UVB, etc. This sounds like they’ve completely forgotten about these energies.
Not forgotten, maybe not mentioned in such a short clip. Remember, these are pros that study these things daily. Theses short clips are just tasters. If someone is interested, they can follow up on the subject.
@@shmookinsit's not like it takes much extra time or energy to add "or UV rays" after "gravity." They didn't explain in what way the lack of gravity contributes, it was just assumed to be the primary factor.
Melanoma develops as a direct result of sun exposure, so it would make sense that removing the Earth's atmosphere and getting those UV rays directly up in space would increase the impact of them on the cancer cells. Very odd that they've seemingly assumed it's gravity to blame.
It would be interesting to know how they came to think it was gravity and not the lack of an electromagnetic field. Unless the ISS is still within that... but I doubt it. Perhaps ISS has some kind of radioactive protection that allows them to discount that. I mean otherwise all of our astronauts are coming back to Earth with cancer.
I understand there needs to be clinical trials. And that is all good for the future. But there are people who have a 100% chance of being dead before the trials even start. If they have no other option, why not allow them to choose on their own? Allow them to decide to take the risk instead of telling them, "Nope, we can't give you that chance to live, you'll just have to die because the trials haven't been completed and analyzed."
Two points, first clinical trials can include patients who don't have any other hope. A cancer specialist is going to try and find those trials for their patients who might be helped by them. But it's not like there's an infinite supply of new drugs that you can just pick up at your nearest hospital. You need to be close enough to take part, and have a reasonable chance to be helped because there are going to be other patients in the same situation but who have a better chance of being helped. Think of it like the trolley problem, if you have enough medication for a thousand patients who do you pick to treat with it? And even then it's still not that simple, not all treatments extend life. Sometimes even the biggest breakthrough won't help a patient's quality or quantity of life. Which I'm actually very passionate about. My aunt developed cancer when I was very little and her family managed to get her to the best most exclusive specialist there was. She got the most cutting edge treatment and decades later her husband told me it was still his biggest regret in life. The treatments turned out to be worse than useless. She spent her final days in agony and those days probably came much sooner than if she had received palliative care. She spent less time with her family who were all traumatized by the experience. It feels like the right thing to do, but sometimes it's really not. That urge to try anything at any cost is how we all feel but genuinely always try to find out what your doctor would do in the same situation. The answer for the best quality and quantity of life may be cutting edge treatment but it also might be no treatment at all.
@@cupguin Indeed, my mother is on her second treatment, seems doing well, but doctor already gave her a time horizon when things will get worse as her immune system gets weaker as she ages, she is almost 70 now! Clinical trials is either hit or miss already for her.
@@cupguin , Interesting, you say, "...what your doctor would do in the same situation." When my father was first diagnosed with glioblastoma the first doctors he had performed surgery but 'could only remove 20%' of the tumor. I was out of the country when all this was discovered and decided upon. Once back home I educated myself as much as possible on his situation and was very angry that surgery was even considered at that prospect of such a % rate! That type of tumor "grows too fast for its own good"__outer cells die off fast while core cells continue reproducing at a faster rate. 'In my opinion', that was just a money maker for those 2 doctors! 😣 I sought out other options for my father and after we told his neurolgist [we] decided not to do chemotherapy, the oncologist called me for an explanation why. I asked if he would answer honestly, "If this was YOUR father, mother, wife, or child__would you have them to do chemotherapy?" He said, "Well__no.'' I asked, "And why is that?" He replied, "Because it's poison, and I wouldn't want them to go through that."__to which I replied, "That's exactly why my father's not doing it, either." I thanked him for giving me an honest answer__he never tried to sway us after that. 😺
But the good news is now they can test cancer treatment way faster than here on earth, so they can see effectiveness of treatment and won’t take years and years to complete a study
@monicarenee7949 thats hopefully, it won't mutate into a transmissible form and escape somehow. And yes, there are transmissible cancers, I'm not aware of any human ones, but there are canine versions. It's also a shame they'll be destroying the ISS soon. Hopefully, it won't take them decades to build a new one.
Does that mean that if you get on the carnival ride Gravitron a few times a day will it gradually start to turn off cancer after a year or more ? This ride actually increases gravity 3 times the normal force of gravity, which would mean its possible to slow cancer 3times ,cancer growth would take 30 years instead of 10 years or possibly destroy cancer over time since it doesn't have the right gravity to live it might give up and die.
The rest of your body, especially organs like brain, heart and lungs, will not work well with a sudden big change in gravity. Not for the amount of time it might take to cure cancer cells.
Supposedly, ADAR1 is not there solely to impulse metastasisit, it probably has other functionality or, at least, other effects. Switching off ADAR1 without knowing what it is globally going to do with the patient seems rather risky. Especially if it is going to be done by an "off the shelf" medicine.
Seems like high gravity will be bad for cancer cells. But those cells are in a human, so what other effects high gravity will have on a human or an animal?
Cosmic radiation is the reason, but fortunately on earth it's magnetic field stops them to penetrate also atmosphere here on earth cosmic particles interact with all sort of particles and lose their energy by scattering in low energy particles
@@polarspirit Sureeee. We can just double earth rotation. 4 hours work, 4 hours free time and 4 hours sleep! Big bubbles no troubles. On the other hand MAYBE we should start by NOT subsidising fossil fuels while we are geoengineering ourselves out of a home, by spewing greenhouses gasses out in insane amounts. Atmospheric carbon content SHOULD be at 220 PPM and now have passed 420 PPM! Progress!? WE are the monkey generation or actually worse. Name me one other mammal that deliberately and knowingly destroy the very habitat that created our species and allowed us to multiply and thrive!? I will centrifuge your logic because you seem to be spinning to slow!
@@RaffleE46The bulky space suits still exist. They're called EVA suits and used outside the ships while in Space. The ones shown here are IVA suits which are only used during launches and reentry. They are also unpressurized here. They get pretty bulky and stiff when they become pressurized, which happens during launch.
Do you guys even know what cancer is?? You know its just bad cells so basically you have have cancer now in your body, its just that your body is able to detect it and break them down.. its not a virus or bacteria
It was contained in a bag as shown in the video, you want them to do that inside your body? It's a completely different thing to contain cancer within the body and to have a container filled with cancer.
Idk how to ask this on Google but I was curious. Cancer dies when it's host dies, and we have stuff that can make it seem like a human died right? so what would cancer do if it believes it's host is dead even though they're actually not?
A reverse engineering question. But one I think that has been thought of. Almost like the pufferfish/cuddlefish poison to make a person seem dead/false death.
@@brooklynvlogs9396 A good theory, but the person would "technically" still have (the) cancer even if the growths stopped. If reactivated would excel in growth extremely quickly and eat away at anything it sees. Cancer cells wouldn't be able to die of course until the patient themself died, I suspect their life would still be cut short a few years unlike other people due to aging and reactivation if the cells recognize that the host is still alive. I don't think it would work in the long run due to each person being exposed to different amounts of sunbathed radiation.
@@Kogasengaha_Hishoshi at least from what I was reading online blood has to stop pumping for 3 days before every cells in the body is dead (including the cancer ones) and I'm guessing we don't exactly have a way to make that happen without actually killing the person. 😅 And I'm supposing we wouldn't be able to just freeze the area to stop blood flowing for 3 days and let the cancer die that way? 🤔
@@brooklynvlogs9396 If we could, Cancer would already be a distant thing lol And it depends on where you cut the blood flow and WHERE THE CANCER EVEN IS. More than likely its in a vital death spot regardless :/ Top of the head/skull/All over the Cranium ect ect (Where any cancer can be) And even within 5-15 minutes of no blood flow/oxygen in anyone's blood flow can cause problems. Even some cells can still even be alive after 3 days frozen, sometimes goddamn years cuz.... it still can be a dormant cell lol Obviously not Cap.America style with cryo kind of sleep but to a degree. Kind of like if you put a cockroach into liquid nitrogen it can still live if you give it time lol.
Thank you all for your devotion to kill what has killed so many of us. I have the strongest faith that soon you all will prevail and countless amounts of lives will be saved. I wish you all the very best of everything. Blessings!!
