What If You Removed The 10 Richest Countries? 

India, china, Us ,Brazi,l Japan,Indonesia...😂 half of the richest already in the list

​@@SAMtheRambler1Probably the world population would be around at 3.8 billion, without these countries, for sure.

Mexico will never die

@@SAMtheRambler1 Japan doesn't make the list. India, China, USA, Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria, Brazil, Bangladesh, Russia, Mexico. Ethiopia 11 and Japan 12.

Not a good idea to use a countries GDP. The only measure that works is GDP / person.

That's a good point. Pretty obvious. Why did I and the creators miss that?

He meant the top 3 (China, USA, and Japan)

@@vincent_hall because India wasn’t included in that number, because India is not in the top 3 GDP (USA, China, and Japan)

@@rememberthiscomment7434 3:15 he said 10 richest country not 3.

it was probably an error in the script, he got it mixed up with the top three being gone

Remove Russia, then stop. 😂

You mean China and India have the greatest contribution to global warming and pollution…. The UK and US in particular are fighting climate change more than anyone

Removing the 10 richest countries the world would be...poorer!!!!

@@linaribaldi3829 yes a lot poorer indeed, but also a lot of less tensions around the world. and by removing the US and China and india UK France there would be a lot less nukes and arms deals creating less tension. population wise we would be back in the 90s around 6 billion people, GDP wise i guess around 70s or 80s not sure about that tho. the only wild cards left would be Russia, North Korea, Iran and possibly Pakistan that could create tensions in the world.

@@TM0TP that's your personal opinion which I do not share. If you remove the richest you'll only have fewer hospitals, fewer schools, fewer means of communication, fewew facilities for anybody... Humanity wouldn't be engaged in scientific discoveries buy only in petty controverties... likes in the Middle Ages.... and ignorance (which come with scarce education ) would rule the world...

@@linaribaldi3829 welp so did western Europe after the fall of the Romans you know something called the dark ages but look at western Europe now lol no one is relevant civilizations rise and fall until better more advanced civilizations take shape

Not just markets, but also a great loss of industrial capacity and technology development.

So would the Saudi Aramco…

Iranian Revolution on steroids. 😢

prob russia tbh

canada and australia too lol

Per capita income or total income measures the average income earned per person in a given area in a specified year. It is calculated by dividing the area's total income by its total population. Per capita income is national income divided by population size.

India and China stop there long, staring match that they’ve been doing for centuries in actually start fighting each other

-Trade between Chile and Argentina is now much more efficient -Andean nations, especially Ecuador grow in population with more habitable land -Switzerland submits to NATO because it can't use its defense tool: The Alps -Caucasus nations also join NATO because of Russian troops on the border -India and China frequently throw an small-scale invasion at each other

Major Losses to India and China too. They will loose their rivers and will start fighting.

Very creative mind.

Yeah, the thing the first props up in Google is not in order literally if you click on Australia, I will say Australia has the 13th largest GDP on earth don’t trust the first source google gives you Google just giving you a list of countries, despite what you actually search

😂 We need debt.

French guyana was not removed on the map. Same for new caledonia or british falklands. This would be consistent if Alaska still appeared on the map, which is not the case.

One can hope.

Hah. Yeah, that tends to happen when someone whose best weapons consist of burning rocks and loud screaming pissess off someone who's in the top 10 of weapons systems innovators world-wide.

Yes, this video didn't seem to focus much on the climatic impact of removing these countries.

I'm an Indian and my country cannot be called based on GDP, but China is far ahead.

let me say that you are under estimating China

The 2 comments above me only look at the skyscrapers but never look at the people who own them.. they don't have freedom but their poverty is even worse than usa poverty... in China most people are still struggling to get basic food, just imagine if u put the top cities of the world all the most expensive cities in the world into a developing country.. usa is suffering in homelessness with nyc and los Angelo's, but imagine china with just as or more expensive cities and people earning about 15% or 1/7 or something of usa.. the news of usa gets to us because they're allowed to interact with the outer world, china doesn't have that freedom, but just imagine 8 Chinese earn as much as 1 usa, and they both have to pay for expensive cities and China has the more expensive or just as expensive cities and we all know the homelessness problem in usa, but we can't know about China.

@@JustCallMeAarav Lol.... You sound S T U P I D even though your comment is long. Stop consuming the Western Media too much.

@@thetribalwriter I am saying if usa is so homeless than imagine china

Germany? The 4th richest country in the world? You're not sure it's in the top 10 richest countries?

You mean the government can be rich but the people can still be poor

India is rich bruh

No Alphabet, Netflix, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon. (No Amazon WS means no Netflix.) No MasterCard or Visa or PayPal. Far fewer consumers. Much less pollution. Far poorer China. NATO poor, in trouble from Russia. No UN HQ. Taiwan is China. China is generally on top. Far more piracy. Less food. Much less charity money. Israel is in trouble. Panama gets much less/no money for the canal. Much less innovation. No US proxy wars.

Just in case you were wondering, Nigeria is the highest GDP in all of Africa and 32nd Pl. Do with this info as you will.

Not curious. Have you seen Africa? I'm from there. It's not curious at all.

Because of GDP they have resources that other people want and can make them good

Alr but still

GDP, people can be poor, he is talking about that country.

No change? Or not censorship.

@@vincent_hall that’s a joke, a dumb one by a joke

Yes, it is

Nope

That’s not what GDP is per capita is just a average among the humans that live in the country. It’s not a special more accurate mathematical super solution. I said yes if you use per capita, of course he would have a video. Just would be a different video with different countries besides for the United States. I’m not comparing apples to oranges your comparing one countries economy to another countries economy. It’s like singing that Apple shouldn’t be considered one of the richest companies on earth because if you average it out through all the deploy, you get a totally different number and if you compare its overall revenue to another company, you’re comparing apples to oranges because you’re not comparing the average salary of the people who work there. Per capita has it uses GDP hat as its uses. GDP purchasing power has its uses Stop thinking one is better than the other.

What, with Russia having free rein to do as it liked? Wake up.

Not true at all! Iran, Russia, Palestine, N. Korea, Myanmar and all African countries still exist.

😂

No they are you just want to sound smart.

No

No

Yeah, different people have different definitions were all these things

Yes, people say that turkey is transcontinental that was in trope up. It has land on Europe there for it’s on the continent of Europe, Europe, has been considered a continent since the time of the ancient Greeks. So please learn some actual geography stuff before you make a comment.

@@zach2382 l could run rings around you in Geography. Europe and Asia are not continents. Eurasia is. Where is the ocean between Europe and Asia? People should stop confusing Geopolitical terms for Geographical ones and vice versa. Same with Mexico. Geograhically it's a Western country but Geopoliticallly it's not a Western Country. Same with Australia and NZ, they're, Geographically, Eastern countries but Geopoliticallly they're Western Countries. Possibly the same could be said for Japan and S Korea

@@zach2382 all you have to do is get the taxonomies right.

@@Chapps1941 what are you talking about? You know absolutely nothing you have no idea how geography works whatsoever have no idea how continent came to be you know nothing about anything you can’t even run rings around the sign post. Mexico is a country in the continent of North America. What does that have to do with anything? Yes, Mexico is a western country. Do you know anything next to anything about Mexico whatsoever? Geopolitics have nothing to do with continents and where countries are. Where did you get the idea that they do from? Did you just make it up? I bet you made it up. Geopolitically just means how the government of a country is run and its relationship to other countries has nothing to do with where is the country is located. Türkiye is a transcontinental country. Countries can be on more than one continent. There’s no reason why they shouldn’t. You are confusing such a basic concept of what a continent is a continent is geographical also has some cultural things in there, but it’s mostly geographical. Turkey has land on both sides of the Bosporus strait. It doesn’t matter that Turks came from Asia. It doesn’t matter that it’s capital Ankara is an Asia. It doesn’t matter that motivates people live in Asia. It does not matter that turkey is a Muslim nation. None of that matters. So, in conclusion, you know, absolutely nothing about geography in your entire comment has proven that. You have no idea what you’re talking about. And should stop.

Japan??

Yes, please. Then remove Xi Jinping and the rest of his CCP.

Can we just remove the oppressive governments? I know many countries would just come up with more dictators though. But they'd have another chance. That said, it's always the people's fault if they get a bad government.

That’s asking for controversy lol.

That is PPP not nominal

@@zach2382That is neither.