What Kind of Messiah Are The Jews Waiting For? | WRETCHED 

Thanks Todd, I’ve often asked myself the same question

bring peace animals alive together❤

You get my sub 🤣‼️

Some Jews will be sucked in by the antichrist who will come in peace, be the political ruler of the world, and rebuild the temple under his 7 year peace covenant. But Jesus, the true messiah, doesn’t return until just before Armageddon, Revelation 16: 15 Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. That’s the last warning of Jesus for his return, and then in the next verse is Armageddon when he returns; 16 And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.

Mashiach will emerge with authority , spiritual power,miracles,prestige and might.

No we do not need a God Man! There is one God not 2

I pray that Jews re-think all this.Jesus did all the things that the Jews say the messiah would do. Could it be that the Jews in charge back then didn’t want their power and money affected ? Jesus was perfect, he was a sacrificial lamb who died for our sins. I feel the Jews of today are being mislead.

He needs to read OT just as he needs a haircut

Supporting verse please ? Because Jesus Christ born and died is written in Old Testament..

The king of heaven open your eyes isreal

Gidian saw god n thot he was going die until god said don't be scared.

Baalim. Yes the Christian Greco Roman Story is Baal. And Jesus was never and never called Immanuel in the New Testament

According to Rivon Krygier, among other things, they wait for a Messiah to fulfil Isaias 11. The funny thing is, Jesus already did that. The very early Church had two local Churches in the very first time of expansion. Jerusalem had been going for some time since Pentecost. Samaria was next, before whereever the Candace was. Was there envy between Jerusalem and Samaria? No. // And the envy of Ephraim shall be taken away, and the enemies of Juda shall perish: Ephraim shall not envy Juda, and Juda shall not fight against Ephraim. // Verses 11 and 12 already fulfilled in Acts 2. Has this fulfilment been cancelled? No. Christian Palestinians are still here to this very day. The logic some Israelis use to prove they never existed as a people actually proves they were a demilitarised people. Precisely according to prophecies enumerated by Tovia Singer. Some of them involve a word of peace going out. Some of them involve God's power over the nations. The Catholic Church has fulfilled both these prophecies. Take a look at Medieval Italy, I'll quote two works by GKC on two Medieval Italians : // War had broken out between Assisi and Perugia. It is now fashionable to say in a satirical spirit that such wars did not so much break out as to go on idefinitely between the city states of medieval Italy. It will be enough to say here that if one of those medieval wars had really gone on without stopping for a century, it might possibly have come within a remote distance of killing as many people as we kill in a year, in one of our great modern scientific wars between our great modern industrial empires. But the citizens of the medieval republic were certainly under the limitation of only being asked to die for the things with which they had always lived, the house they inhabited, the shrines they venerated and the rulers and representatives they new; and had not the larger vision calling for them to die for the latest rumours about remote colonies as reported in anonymous newspapers. And if we infer from our own experience that war paralyzed civilization, we must at least admit that these warring towns turned out a number of paralytics who go by the names of Dante and Michael Angelo, Ariosto and Titian, Leonardo and Columbus, not to mention Catherine of Siena and the subject of this story. While we lament all this local patriotism as a hubbub of the Dark Ages, it must seem a rather curious fact that about three quarters of the greatest men who ever lived came out of these little towns and were often engaged in these little wars. It remains to be seen what will ultimately come out of our large towns; but there has been no sign of anything of this sort since they became large; and I have sometimes been haunted by a fancy of my youth, that these things will not come till there is a city wall around Clapham and the tocsin is rung at night to arm the citizens of Wimbledon. ... The crown of Sicily, a considerable centre of controversy at the time, was apparently claimed by a certain Gauthier de Brienne, and the Papal cause to aid which Gauthier was called in aroused enthusiasm among a number of young Assisians, including Francis, who proposed to march into Apulia on the count's behalf; perhaps his French name had something to do with it. For it must never be forgotten that though that world was in one sense a world of little things, it was a world of little things concerned with great things. There was more internationalism in the lands dotted with tiny republics than in the huge homogeneous impenetrable national divisions of to-day. The legal authority of the Assisian magistrates might hardly reach further than a bow-shot from their high embattled city walls. But their sympathies might be with the ride of the Normans through Sicily or the palace of the Troubadours at Toulouse; with the Emperor throned in the German forests or the great Pope dying in the exile of Salerno. Above all, it must be remembered that when the interests of an age are mainly religious they must be universal. Nothing can be more universal than the universe. And there are several things about the religious position at that particular moment which modern people not unnaturally fail to realise. For one thing, modern people naturally think of people so remote as ancient people, and even early people. We feel vaguely that these things happened in the first ages of the Church. The Church was already a good deal more than a thousand years old. That is, the Church was then rather older than France is now, a great deal older than England is now. And she looked old then; almost as old as she does now; possibly older than she does now. The Church looked like great Charlemagne with the long white beard, who had already fought a hundred wars with the heathen, and in the legend was bidden by an angel to go forth and fight once more though he was two thousand years old. ... ... Nevertheless, there is a queer quality in that time; which, while it was international was also internal and intimate. War, in the wide modern sense, is possible, not because more men disagree, but because more men agree. Under the peculiarly modern coercions, such as Compulsory Education and Conscription, there are such very large peaceful areas, that they can all agree upon War. In that age men disagreed even about war; and peace might break out anywhere. Peace was interrupted by feuds and feuds by pardons. // Was it Zachary 9 that Tovia Singer mentioned? FULFILLED.

Is antichrist their waiting for

God is one, God isn't human. if you're gonna pray to Jesus cuz of his mircales, you might as well pray to Moses for splitting the sea with his stick, Or maybe to Noah, for building his vessel in the middle of desert after being told by God that the flood is coming. Or Maybe Solomon for all the powers God has given him, Or maybe to Abraham for surviving the flame they threw him into. All Prophets had mircales, However, people should take their messages and believe, not worship 'em.

Very clear as king david and more jewish seeking to live with no work no holy no problem they want everything in simple way without work and it has to come simple way what they wanted everything has to come in very simple ways to them this what they wanted.

People forget, or didn’t pay attention. Jesus told us who the Jews are waiting on, their father is not ours. Why do you think they wanted him dead? He was NOT speaking in allegory when he said their father was the devil. He was telling them to their face he knew exactly who their father was.

Jesus is not God the Father or God the Son, because he tells us variously *the Father is greater than I* and *You must worship the Son as you worship the Father* and so we have to unravel the relationship. God is Spirit, Father and Son and Holy Spirit, this is the Trinity of One God. God has one Son begotten not made which means *Of Himself* this could be compared to the relationship we have with ourselves when we address ourselves with regard to any venture we ask how feasible it is, and we get our own answer, just as God who asks Himself any question He too receives His own answer from the faculty of Truth and also Wisdom because God's self loves Him the answer is always at a higher level of Truth and Wisdom taking into account God's righteousness and His Providence. The Word of the Lord is zealous to put into effect all that the Father has given Him, and as the Father creates Life the Son has life in Himself The Son has a privelidge in that everyone *through time* will hear his testimony and the children of God are his progeny which he sires (non-sexually) as a proxy for God the Father who has but One Son. In order to create the Children of God there has to be a feminine, this is the Holy Spirit who is the source of the human soul, this means that the human soul is feminine in males and females. *The exegesis of the soul* states _The sages that came before us gave the soul a feminine name, she also has a feminine nature and even has a womb_ Simeon told Mary that *and a sword shall pierce your own soul* this is a Holy Impregnation by the Word of the Lord that can occur during life when someone is either *convinced of his faith* or has received his _accounting of judgement during life_ where the Word of the Lord allows that person to see the child of God leaving his deceased body during judgement. So we are all to be the children of God by the fertility of the Virgin who is the Holy Spirit. There is no disputing that the Trinity is established in Jesus Christ but God is beyond comparison or limitation, yet according to biblical tradition a person could be given permission to rule co-equally with a human ruler and God responds to generosity with generosity, Jesus says in the Beatific Vision *I am wholehearted as is my Father wholehearted, you are halfhearted* Notice that He calls God the Father "my Father" . Therefore we can pray to Jesus and he can act accordingly to our needs. But Jesus is also the Son of Man, John 3:13 *No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven-the Son of Man* The process by which this was accomplished is that God made a promise to Abraham and his progeny, He adopted Jacob and renamed him ISRAEL Israel died and left Paradise a thousand years later 1400 years before Jesus, God said to Israel *You are my servant Israel in whom I shall be glorified* Jesus identified John the Baptist as Elijah redivivus and John the Baptist identified Jesus as Israel redivivus in John 1:26-27 _“I baptize with water,” John replied, “but among you stands one you do not know. 27 He is the one who comes after me, the straps of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie.”_ Together with John 3:13 the origin of Jesus is Israel so *Jesus is the Son of Man*

This man’s arguments are terrible. 1. There is only one God. No other share his glory or stand on his face. 2. Human sacrifices are the worst way to honor God. Sacrificing God is impossible, but the hubris to claim to have killed God is terrible as well. 3. Christ may have been sinless, as well as holy. However, there is no reason to believe the Messiah is going to be God, nor that God will become a man. When a person acts blamelessly, they are a true Son of God, and embody the spirit of God. To see them is to see God, but only through the human mirroring of righteousness. 4. God himself says in many places “Following the Laws are NOT too hard to do!” That he has NO5 given these laws beyond our ability. Reject the sin-loving notion that none can prove righteous but God. He begs us to live without transgression. We CAN, and in leu of succeeding this, repent and turn away from sin.

What's with all the walking around? And why so arrogant?

Dude, you couldn't be any more WRONG !!! Go talk to Rabbi Tovia Singer.

My only issue with this is your condescending attitude that is not Christ-like.

It is clearly... Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) . Since Hebrew Bible (the old testament) and the new testament come to that conclusion ... John 16 ... "“12 .. I have much more to say to you, more than you can now bear. 13 But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come. 14 He will glorify me because it is from me that he will receive what he will make known to you. 15 All that belongs to the Father is mine. That is why I said the Spirit will receive from me what he will make known to you." Here the Father refers to Allah (God), as the word Father is used in Bible to mention God (Allah) multiple times... and the snippet is what Jesus told his fellows before crucifixion. (From Bible point of view itself)

I don't know that what he said. But what are you talking about? Who is Jesus? Where is he now? What new testament? The Messiah is alive, today then for ever. You are nothing