What Makes This Terminator Tank Extremely Lethal? 

nato is losing militarily, economically, and politically.

BMPT terminator 3 can be on the T14 chassis with a khinzhal module but instead of one 57mm gun there will be 2. I think it will be similar to T15 with a khinzhal module (2 Ataka missiles and 1 57mm gun, apfsds-120mm penetration on 60° armor from 1.5km)

terminator came in, to hold back nato hardware. Simple

Terminator in addition to 2x30mm auto cannon and 2x2 Ataka atmg's also has 1 7,62mm coaxial machinegun and 2x30mm grenade launchers on the side above the tracks.

@@darkmode8482😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

😂

it is NOT a tank!

Cool looking but junk.. when was the last news about them after the "deployment"? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@kdawg9477 there was a lot of news from Ukraine that the Russians are using them there, and there are a lot of videos

@@mosnicolae1678 It is very much a tank, its just not a MBT, or Main battle tank. its job is to fend off CAAT(combined anti armor team), and other fast movers that are threats to MBTs

@@kdawg9477 update: plenty of videos of terminators in Ukraine. They are whooping ass. Go to, war of regrets. 🍻

это были не танкисты, а фрицы. Скоро их ждет тоже самое что и в 1945, правильно вы подметили, последняя битва будет в берлине, не запомнили немцы урок - придется напоминать, привет из России и с наилучшими пожеланиями!

@@Alex_Brave777 I think you are right. Greetings to you as well!

@@Alex_Brave777 Apparently, FSB (the KGB replacement) agents are desperate to get out, they're on the inside; and know full-well that Russia can't win. And they know that criminal prosecutions are coming. Putin wants to drag this out-as it suits him, but the war needs to be prosecuted quickly. Ukraine have been saying for months they need 300-400 modern Western third-generation MBTs to finish the war by driving the invaders out. They're getting about 320. No Challenger 2 has ever been destroyed in combat-it's considered the best protected and safest MBT, M-1 Abrams destroyed over 500 Iraqi T-72s for no loss (only the M-2 Bradleys, working in hunter-killer teams with the M-1s destroyed more, for a few losses as they're IFVs with lighter armour-but they're a whole generation better than what Russia has, and bring a laser rangefinder to the battlefield for example-which is a capability the Ukranians didn't have before). And even American tankers say Leopard 2 is a better tank than the Abrams, which is very thirsty-a jet engine was chosen in part for logistics reasons: the M-1s are intended to share the fuel supply for the helicopters, as it's just easier with their doctrine of using gunships with MBTs as the ultimate tank hunting team. The MBTs use a lot of fuel, so it needs to be forward deployed, and with the Apaches, the fuel's already there. Or somesuch. Cold War doctrine, for fighting a near-pear enemy in Europe. But it's also a maintenance whore, the Americans weren't lying when they talked about the importance and difficulty of the logistics train. They take a lot to keep running, including a lot of specialists. Leopard has a diesel engine, and Leopard 2 is known for its very well armoured hull especially, as well as having the best mobility of any MBT, just as the Leopard 1 before it had. So it has horses for Spain. In short: you're a brainwashed fool. NOTHING you believe, is real.

The terminator is still an easy target if its not properly supported by infantry, also the first one has already been taken out in ukraine, what is the total number of terminators made... 20`?

@@legatilegions8055 у нас заводы сейчас 24\7 работают, сделаем много

First Terminator already been destroyed, yesterday. Likely near Kreminna, yeah.

@@user-mr5hk1dq8g every machine can be defeated, there are none that are impregnable to defeat, I do know that the terminator is a force multiplyer in a battalion. SAVAGE DESTRUCTION.

@@michaelmontgomery5326 they only have like 11 working models left lol

@@user-mr5hk1dq8g У хохлов больше 3000 танков и бмп уничтожили,а оно перемогает 1 терминатор-теперь вот натовские танки просрет и все о победе мечтает.

@@yeticonfettis They don't know, nobody knows how many there are, but there must be more, in addition the arms factories have begun to increase their production due to various factors... Nothing has been known about the destruction they comment on, and surely the ucros would use it as news international, knowing that these machines are considered the best of the Russian army...

Too bad they are not reliable and too expensive they choose to modernise their old soviet tanks because its more cost effective 😂😂

@@thomasgaucher-peressini тебе видней, давай в добровольцы, там увидишь :))

@@Georgson copium much

And its missiles at the sides of the turrent gets shot by an rpg, now it's useless

The role of this comedy tank is to appear on parades and be salivated over by trolls.

Unfortunately for the crew that will make it the first Target

@@andrewgreen1940 The Ukrainians weren't impressed. The biggest weakness seems to be its sensors. They don't give complete awareness. This is a death sentence in urban combat. It seems that the best defense for a tank in MOUT (military operations in urban terrain) is the good old MK I grunt.

Depth of the Russian arsenal….Translation: lack of faith in Russian infantry support of their armored columns

Lol 😂 idt Any Tank against ATGM weather American, German or Korean or Indian or Chinese will face same fate what Russian Tank R facing

- I need your Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk - You forgot to say "please!" - I forgot to say Kherson

Terminator needs kyiv

@@VivekSingh-fb8vp They'll cope better than you get jokes.

@@AlexKarasev we’ll get these territories without saying this word. The Luhansk region and the Crimea has already become our places . And if you know a piece of history dude these territories have been Russian and they have been given to Ukraine as a surprise. Nowadays we can say by a mistake.

It cleared the trees without hurting any tanks or infantry.

But it went boom

Why shooting if i can mined all the fields and everything pass would kaboom?

Yeah it came in fired and few hours later got an Excalibur in the face. Please understand Russian tech is not even close to Western tech.

@@iljavija Russian tech is better in some things and other way around. West is not superior in everything, please that🤣😆

well it didnt age well as one was destroyed.

@@correctionguy7632 Did anyone said it was made of unobtanium??

@@daemianbox Then how did the video "not age well"? We have videos of it being destroyed and other than that we have seen it shoot at empty forests. Made no impact on the conflict.

Россия не потеряла ни одной машины Терминатор на Украине,не ври, это укропропоганда! Лучше посмотри как она их уничтожает!

yes, but succesfully killed a lot of ukraine... or nato soldiers?

@@diawannoto You should worry more about your 3 days invasion of Ukraine instead of Nato, for now :)

Terminator imo (unless you are out on open ground), if it doesn't take you out first!

Well if I have a Javellin and TOW I kill both.

@@DOI_ARTS If you don't get killed first.

I wouldn't kill any of them because I don't live in Ukraine.

@@DOI_ARTS if you will have a chance...

same efficiency as the never seen T14 tank: two terminators was severely damaged from Ukrainians and after this, all 10 terminators was retired from the front...

Severely damaged your brain!

@@leneanderthalien Yeah suture like when Russia run out of missiles or the martyrs of snake island

@@leneanderthalien source?

@@leneanderthalien ссылку на повреждённые машины можно???

BMPT1 and 2 were, that’s the BMPT3. Like the T14, I’m not sure if it ever went into full production

@@jimohara yeah but i thought that it was named t15 armata the ifv variant

@@jimohara Geeks. I learn a lot from the comments. 👍😁😘🧐🤓

@@TamagoHead Do you know what a trainspotter is? Or what the hobby of trainspotting was? Geeks, sitting on platforms writing down the numbers of the trains pulling into the station in a collect them all sort of fashion? Very quaint pastime of a bygone era. My earliest memory was my father taking me to collect my brother from school and waiting to turn out onto the main road and a helicopter landing in the field next to us and watching all the soldiers jumping out, the first laying down to give cover and then the rest running to the perimeter of the field. That was pretty awesome to watch as a 4 yo. I’m no expert but I’ve always kept a long eye on all military tech since. You haven’t seen the remote control robot dogs that fire machine guns attached to their backs have you? If you had you wouldn’t be laughing. The world is turning into some sort of dystopian nightmare. Think how they’re going to attempt to improve on drones after this conflict. Who f**k are you calling me a geek? I’m not the one building a remote control robot dogs with a machine guns on their backs! Coming to protect kindergartens and communities near you soon, no doubt, as soon as the robot dog controlling people get the rest of the world in line. See you in the concentration camps, sucker.

@@jimohara Apologies, it was meant as a compliment. ☹️

it has no turret. lol

@@lexburen5932 the component moving in circles is a turret

thye have a lot of other sensors, satellite connectiona dn connection to a drone...and severla computers, tnak can go back home witout crew..in automode they can make a war alone..humans are not needed to control the fire oterwise it will blast everything that moves...it even work as anti aircraft wepaon..

All standard equipment on US armor since the 90s. GPS location and navigation through deep desert, thermal vision, and night vision were instrumental in both Gulf wars.

Meanwhile Ukraine killed 1/2 terminators in Russia. Russia has like 5 of these vehicles ? 🤣🤣🤣

The US has thousands of IFV's that are better than this terminator which has its guns shaking itself apart

@@takeshikovacs4728 🤡

As far as i know there are two guns because of the fact that they were Not able to implement a two Belt feed System te change the ammotype quikly from i dont know HE to AP So there are two guns with two different belts

@@dozan174 Oh I forgor that, yeah that right HE and AP are correct (It has specified detail I also forgor)

@@dozan174 я тебе открою военный секрет! Но в этих орудиях одинаковые ленты) Просто в ленте идут разные вариации осколочно-фугасных снарядов и бронибойных в порядке ленты) И поверь будь ты на 500, что на 2500 метрах от нее, ты бы понял что не хотел бы там находится, и все предыдущие выборы судьбы, привели тебя к фатальной ошибке!

а теперь скажи умник-а что будет плохого в том если такой дрон и вправду будет имется?

?v=RXNLXgdjLUQ Terminator in actions

It moves and shoots.

Saw a video on telegram channel, they were using tank and BMPT to attack advancing Ukraine army, well it wasn’t a good day to Ukrainians

@PEter Harrald +++

@PEter Harrald Having a drone is well and good, and knowing that a BMPT is nearby is too (though fuck being infantry with enemy heavy armor armed to the gills nearby). But the question is whether one has sufficient means available to take it out. And Ukrainians don't have sufficient means nearby.

Why not, one Excalibur in enough to finish it. One that was sent to UA lasted for 18 hours before it got blown to smithereens.

@@iljavija Not before it had highly likely liquidated dozens of Ukr nooseys and obliterated several Ukr vehicles.

Один ствол заряжен осколочно фугасными снарядами , а второй бронебойными . Поэтому в бою он будет стрелять из кажлого ствола отдельно

Keep in mind these fire *simulatneously*. They also have two very agressive muzzle brakes and are completely exposed. The barrels on these things shake violently and have horrendous accuracy and dispersion from being blasted about by the muzzle brake concussion. Ever stood next to someone firing a rifle with a brake like this? It's very unpleasant. Imagine that in 30mm

It's an anti infantry vehicle. 30mm is enough for that.

A ha ha 🤦 😄 This is not rust, this is such a painting

Деривация(2С38) have 57mm gun

What exactly is covered with rust?

See if it's enough or not ?v=RXNLXgdjLUQ

Shut up idt All TB 2 entering into Ukraine are wiped out within few days. Look like u haven't count the number

Don't you find it funny that ever since the russians started to use their SAMs to protect their slowly advancing forces that almost all drones including the Bayraktar has become pretty much useless? I guess you didn't notice the lack of new 'drone kino' supposedly wrecking russian armor. No new footage for months. That shows that the Bayraktar's time to shine has passed...

@@KondorDCS of course it's funny. How the orcs didn't use their SAMs until recently, that's funny.

Run, Forest, run as far as you can.

Stugna too!

yeah, at the service of their puppet masters - poor British, they don't even realize they live in a plantation of slaves

🤣🤣😂🇷🇺💪 I love how you dismantled that British gay dog

The irony. Almost a year and you still haven’t gotten close to taking Kiev. What a joke.

Says the person whose army ran out of fuel 30km across their own border.

@@Aisatsana1971 The ''special operation'' is to DEMILITARISE and DENAZIFY Ukraine, that is why the Ukrainian's are dropping like flies, and good riddance to them.

Smoke launches with frag grenades loaded. Yup a super weapon.😎😁

@@vonSchwartzwolfe two 30 mm automatic grenade launchers (AGS-17)

only if you use it against corrupt Capitol Hill .lol

Narrow? In cities it's crawling with hard-to-locate anti-tank stuff in (sometimes tall) buildings. It's the MBTs that have narrow vision.

Exactly. The west are pushing and pushing. FAAFO

haha, it is russia against nato, everyone helped ukraine, so why not use latest weapon, and if usa decided to join directly let there be WW 3.

It is sad that Russian tank turrets are logging more total flight hours than the Russian Air Force.

@@swaghauler8334 and more sad a anto soldiers media life ij front line its not even days,, but hours..

@@lunarkparkes You forgot to clarify: Ukrainian soldiers, specifically in Bajmut, live an average of 4 hours.

Yeah but twin cannons are cooler

🙄

@@FinalRepublic bang on

it would not be necessary for that because one, you can store much more ammo of 30mm than of 57mm or 75mm, secondly you don't need any extra pen on the 30mm because you have 4 ATGMs on this thing for destroying enemy armor and defensive positions (should you need to), you also have 2 30mm grenade launchers too that are able to fire over cover and destroy enemies hiding behind said cover, not to mention that a 57mm or 75mm would have far less of a rate of fire than 2 30mm and would be far less effective at suppressive fire which is extremely important in combat, and last but not least 2 30mm cannons are more than enough to destroy enemy APCs, IFVs, and motor vehicles, not to mention that 30mm shells are far cheaper to produce and produce in large quantities compared to 57mm and 75mm, and considering just about every other Russian APC and IFV uses 30mm shells it would also be much simpler for logistical reasons. also it's better to have 2 cannons than one because should one jam you have another cannon you can still use.

They don’t have secret stuff anymore. They don’t have the Soviet budget for secret wonderweapons.

Russia churning out tons of new groundbreaking kit like tsunami Poseidon torpedos , one to look out for is Russian EMP , aka the microwaver or putins speech “ I got high energy weapons “ . Some idiots can’t even get it’s not Soviet Union anymore, this is modern Russia

You know that even Russian generals and FSB agents are fleeing? I'm happy and laughing at all the goofy weirdos like you. 🤣👍

@@jurgmeier4547 he’s a realist unlike you , You make up fiction as a rational argument . Which way is the battlefront going ? West

🤣 get off the drugs

Even the US Army says the Bradley is under-gunned.

🤣🤣🤣

Твой Бредли это гробовозка. Менее смертоносней чем Бредли это же надо такое ляпнуть.

The Bradley is a piece of junk. That's why they are shipping them to Ukraine to be dismantled for scrap.

Nope

@@mbtenjoyer9487 yup

It was developed for Grozny. The lack of TRAINED infantry was the issue Russia was trying to address with this. It didn't pan out in Ukraine. There is no real substitute for SKILL in combined arms operations.

Okay, asshole. We realized that the USA is "The smartest and strongest" But where are your vaunted UAVs and ATGMs if the LPR is completely liberated

It is also going to be the first Target of an infantry anti-tank team

@@swaghauler8334 No, it was developed for urban warfare, based on the experience from the caucasus conflict, which is different.

Those are dual 2A42 30mm guns, shared with BMP-2 and Ka-52 chopper. Also there is a PKTM machine gun.

@@Max_Da_G He's referring to the thumbnail, where the uploader has unnecessarily photoshopped a third 30mm barrel onto the turret, which seems silly to me too

@@pyrosish I didn't even look at the pic lol I thought he meant that BMPT only has one 30mm gun! Oooops...

these area useful to clear objective from infrantry

Well thats a lie, there has been no such a "NATO publication" that claimed that.

the only thing i would not get closer woith a rpg, cause i would be shot first.i have seen nato soldeirs trying to shoot it after some seconds you dont se any shoot from the otherside, theya ll died or they did run away...

These are not conscripts using these units. Russia is using "contract" forces as they call them which is Professional Voluntary Soldiers. The unit they embedded them into in Dec 21 is a professional unit.

@@Knight_Kin of course they need contractors. Their army is a joke, and they can't mobilize because the government is lying to their people about it not being a war, but a "special operation".

@@Knight_Kin professional replacing ERA with egg cartons and rubber sheets🤷🏻‍♂️

Ukraine declared the fourth total mobilization already. Russia has used only 30% of the military group concentrated before the war on the Ukrainian border, and did 2-3 full rotations of acting troops already... Ukraine is a graveyard for Ukrainians themselves and for thousands of foreign mercenaries from all the world!

@@maksimluzin1121 they'll keep coming, too. Russia has taken more casualties in 6 months than they did in their entire invasion of Afghanistan, which is really pathetic given their army's size compared to Ukraine.

But gepard is a anti air not a support vechicel

The important part is the hull…The turret is unmanned with a hull of a tank, this AFV is very survivable than all BMP variants.

У этой бмпт стоит Активная защита последнего поколения, так что поверь,эта штука и Абрамс в силах разобрать на запчасти

It doesn't look like it's designed to face down a main battle tank. Only main battle tanks are built for that role, with anti tank vehicle and man portable missiles filling in the rest.

@@Knight_Kin yes it is…it has ataka ATGMS capable of penetrating 800mm of composite armor.

@@Knight_Kin Он и не предназначен для борьбы с танками. Я только сказал что он может разобрать любой танк, при себе стоимости дешевле западного танка в несколько раз дешевле

Taps forehead "Can't destroy what isn't there" There's like, what, 14 T-14s produced so far?

No 125

@@skankshunts2156 doesn't matter how many they have if their army is too incompetent to keep them fueled. The whole world is laughing at them.

@@skankshunts2156 125 T14 ? my arse you little shrink head, they maybe dreaming of 125 T14s ;) lmfao

You are wrong

And expensive

this is literally just an uparmoured bmp with more elevation

US/NATO long ago chose war. Wtf you expect???

@@aniviamain309 Did you not see the video my guy? ITS HIGHLY ARMORED

both of us know that's bullshit, if any BMPT has been captured of destroyed the Ukranians would be full of propaganda like it was with the Moskva

2 was severely damaged, all 10 was retired from front...today zero in action

@@leneanderthalien need to know that

@@leneanderthalien Check again they are currently being used now

Wait till you in the front…don’t be stupid

In short everything

@@elozinoemeovrode9779 yeah chopped like metballs..

Performs a valuable function When it blows up, the Russians know they are engaging the enemy

@@jamesricker3997 None of them have been destroyed though, but they are also no longer in Ukraine. They were shipped back to Russia.

A lot of gay ass fanboying in here. Any proof, or is it the western propaganda bumping your gums from their hand up your ass, lol!? Russia holds all but the entire Southeast of UKRAINE and does so at a numbers disadvantage of 3 to 1 for Ukraine. Russia is whooping that ass, but keep talking that Zelensky talk where he argues that Ukraine is retreating forward, and Russia is advancing bacwards, LMAO!

Sure it doesnt 😁

@@voidtempering8700 check again, they are easy prey for Excalibur ammo.

But great for parades 😭 lol

I believe only 2 or 3 of the originals in Ukraine have not been destroyed or sent back to Russia for repair.

@@losthero0 must read and learn a lot my friend...

So why the ukranians got bitten ,lossing every day ground and doing defensive retririting war then???You watch too much one-sided brainwashing mass media mate!

@@Mr777koko You need to tell your English teacher they failed.

@@Mr777koko keep cool...must wait ..sorry it's hard time for you to understand..

You know nothing about military hardware, little boy.

Regardless, russia is a junk country

this is bullshitt. why they dont bring the mighty t-90 to Ukraine? affraid of javelin or nlaw? 😂

I mean, Ukrainians shot down atleast 3 KA-52s with Stugna-P (an ATGM without proximity fuse), so i don't know why ruSSians can't do the same with Atakas. Skill issue maybe? 😏 Or the fact that Vichrs are way too expensive for tanks to use 😏

@@pixelion1579 T-90s are already in Ukraine, what are you talking about?

I Love this machine, In such small number's it is not a threat :)

This machine is a beast in urban warfare, just look at it's capabilities in close quarters and narrow passages.

@@Knight_Kin in cities itll still die to infantry, like any other vehicle

@@aniviamain309 ага-поэтому лучше вообще быть без брони-ведь ее все равно подобьют!-ты наверное какой то гений!ахаха

Don't worry, the drone(s) that watches over this thing is armed also. The newest system is completely automated, no crew required.

Exactly

Like any tank... At first, try to hit such a small head from a range of 1-2 kilometers...

of course of course))) and in winter Russia only wins, you always said so before losing 😂

That’s a nice copium subscription you’re on. You must be giving your dealer your last penny. Terminators don’t have turrets, also only one has been destroyed so far after a year of fighting. Meanwhile Ukraine has close to 0 tanks left, their tank reserves have been so completely drained that they have to resort to begging the west to send them tanks.

I doubt the Americans or the British have something that can take hits from Javelin and NLAW.

What’s your point? You’re saying an anti-tank missile can take out a tank? Man you must be a genius to be able to figure that out

@@starship9629 My point is they have been irrelevent in Ukraine.They aren't anything special is all

@@richlopez5896 And one more thing. Just because these can be taken out by a Javelin doesn't mean they're irrelevant or nothing special. By that logic, no tank on this planet is anything special and relevant

@@starship9629 They are irrelevent because Russia CAN'T put them into combat in Ukraine because they have very few and it is a big loss and propaganda to get it shown destroyed on social media like their T-90M was.They ARE irrelevent because they are just for parades like their T-14 tank is

How would rotating the muzzle breaks change anything for the good of accuracy

@@kalgstol Are you not witness to the shockwaves of firing shaking the barrels laterally...

@@idgaf5252 are you not listening to yourself. Physics guy. If you rotate the muzzle break 90° you will have the same effect, just up and down, not side to side. As for accuracy, I would prefer covering a larger area left, right than have elevation off and shoot over their head

@@kalgstol I see you liking your own comment lmao, I'm still right, you can't argue a vertical muzzle break wouldn't reduce the barrels from wobbling.

@@idgaf5252 Do you have an example of a single gun in the world that uses muzzle brake/compensator that vents vertically? Also being in a building these babies shoot at, even 2 meter dispersion is enough to send me running the hell outta there. Wouldn't be much good since those rounds penetrate building right through...

@@Mal101M did you see the Ukrainian parade of Russian Vehicles destroyed in Kiev? Do you see Russian troops marching in Kiev? I think we both know who's talking truth here and it's not Russia and it's definitely not you

No reports of a terminator being taken out by a Javelin. Source?

@@Narukosaki Did you see how ukraine has lost 25% of their country now and none of their supposed counterattacks have achieved anything? Of course they can inflict losses on the russians, but considering that their losses are around 70k KIA....I wouldn't hold my breath for Ukraine's victory if I were you.

If getting destroyed by the impact of a Javelin = bad tank, then there is no such thing as a good tank, since the Javelin and other top attack AT weapons are practically lethal to any tank, and in case of the Javelin, even active protection systems, such as the throphy(israeli APS that is being adopted by the US military on newer Abrams tanks) can't stop a Javelin when its on top attack mode.

@@LoboalphaMASTER it's not only the machine it's the tactics that is used you might have the greatest tank of all time but if you have bad tactics you're going to lose

The BMP-T was actually deployed to Ukraine. I saw a video of it getting attack by artillery round (with another 2 tanks next to it). Not sure what happened to it cause all vehicles reversed and video ended. Cool to look at but it is junk. No news of it after months