What's the Fastest Half-Ton You Can Buy? World's Toughest Truck Drag Race #1 

The Fast Lane Truck First Which brand will take you to 300,000 thousand miles with the least amount of money in repairs. I already know the answer.. Second who in the hell would buy a Nissan?!?!!

The best never rest Ford

So these things will blast here in the Netherlands, below sea level 😎

wheres the chevy?

@@philllsxga.7737 A older 90s Chevy with a manual transmission.

😂 😂

3-5 days business days

😐🔫

Savage 💀💀

The gmc and ram looked identical to how much they lost by against thhe EcoBoost. Nothing will beat a twin turbo at 6500 feet above sea level lol.

Yeah, really

LMAO

Lmao!

Recalls are batting 1000%

Especially that ford.

That was in the video

that's what she said

The 2.7 eco boost is a nice motor too. They did a video with the 2.7 L against the 3.5L ecoboost they were neck and neck! I have a ram but I definitely like the fords that gonna be my next truck

Nissan with those highway gears hung in pretty good against the jimmy!

Shelter93 the 5.0 could take the hemi with no problem. The 5.6 Nissan vs the hemi would be a great race like you said

@@possummcdonald6388 a 5.0 would get slapped. Just less power.

ToAstYNaChO FYI the 5.0 has the same amount of power as the 5.7 hemi and the f150 lighter. Go be stupid somewhere else

Kchhibs not sure about the ram

your not just wrong your super wrong...some of these trucks are made in Mexico and WILL have major problems due to build quality...plus new vehicles are NOT made to last with all that touch screen BS and dated electronic junk...yes i said dated, just think of 20 year old technology today, you would have a Gateway Fax machine in a car from 1998

Agreed

stickloaf Parts in new vehicles are engineered to be as cheap as possible without sacrificing too much rigidity and strength. I'm unsure which one will be most reliable in the long run. My bets would probably be on the Titan or Tundra. Realistically though I'd probably take the GMC.

stickloaf the tiant and the f150 are built in the USA if I’m not mistaken

Brian... Absolutely! That's the race I want to see as well! Judging by how damn close the 5.0 was to the Ecoboost, I think it would beat the larger V8s. TFL please make it happen.

They need to get a more proper equipped 5.0, the 3.15 axle ratio is pretty lousy and the weakest available. With 3.55 or 3.73 the Coyote is way faster.

6.2 beats them... hes already done a video between the titan ram and chevy

bet the 5.0 could beat all of them

@@brianiannarelli1168 lmfao not a chance. My neighbor just traded his 16 5.0 on a 16 Chevy 6.2... there's no comparison... and I'm a ford guy

And the 400k miles you can drive it for.

That's pretty interesting

I’m saying man… everybody claims that there’s more reports on them than the 5.0 yet they don’t realize the ecoboost probably outsells the 5.0 7:1 lol I got 105,000 miles on mine and not a single issue 🙏🏽

Thanks for posting. I'm a Mopar guy, but love boost😁

Imagine every truck there with twin turbos!?

@@Rocksolidbullys well, GM does have a turbo 4. Just saying

DURAMAX_DELIGHT except you’re living in fantasy land, the 2019 Limited does have the 450hp/510lb-ft Raptor engine.

without watching the video and looking at you name and the level of butt hurt, I know who won. But given your argument, lets imagine the F-150 also had more cylinders and displacement.

DURAMAX_DELIGHT if they all had twin turbos the 5.0 would be on top but I know you’re a diesel man so it doesn’t really matter to you

No doubt...its entertaining....fierce loyalism...not sure why

When i became the sun.. people like what they like and will defend it without question, points can be argued all day but for what, if people like the Ford they will buy it, if people like the gmc they will buy it and so on, truth be told they are all disposable piles of tin foil at this point but cost as much as a house so no thanks, I will stick to motorcycles if I need a truck I can borrow one

@@Zonedout-sx1il 100 percent truth..they want to keep us financed for eternity!!

@@whenibecamethesun..8759 Yes, debt and you've become a slave to it.

@@oltob6707 me

Not this owner of a 2016 3.5L Ecoboost. (I've got the 3.55 rear end as well). I drive mine in Sport Mode all the time. But I blow everybody off the line. I get 50 yards ahead before most people clear the the intersection. And the funny thing is, you don't even have to punch it. Just about a quarter throttle gets it going pretty good. I get up to 100 mph in no time at all.

@@WhatDayIsItTrumpDay just hope it dont break down had SHO 3.5 Turbos no parts still waiting 3 months

They have to because they'll fall apart.

I take car of my ford thats why i drive slow. Watching all the slower trucks fly bye me in the fast lane. Lmfao

I had no idea how slow they were until I drove one and realised how slow it was.

Turbos will do that to you lol. Gotta love a good turbo.

Nice. Watch them cam phasers. They tend to fail quite fast on those EcoBrokes.

@@truthkeeperfilms no they don't lol plenty of people in my family have had eco boost and we've had one for almost 6years and it's never had a issue

@@thatmaverickguy859 - Good for you, seriously.. glad you didn't have an issue. I think most people have issues and don't know they do. They think rattle on start up is normal.

@@truthkeeperfilms yeah it runs smooth and clean

Ryan Belden yeah I noticed in this video that was the only engine note that sounded good to me. Everything else was too muffled or weak.

Gmc was the most dissapointing. They've got a 6.2 with a wimpy little puff of an exhaust sound.

@@andrewl.9736 These trucks are made to be quiet for a more comfortable ride. Put a nice aftermarket exhaust of your choice on the 6.2L and it'll sound just as great as any other truck.

I have driven ever type of new truck and the titan definitely has the loudest grunt coming from the engine.

It sounds like a 4 cylinder rice can Honda civic. Gmc and ram have the deep v8 rumble

Why are you surprised? The 5.0 has more hp but less torque. Makes it close BUT the ecoboost can get 100+ hp from a $500 tune sooo.

@@dn9418 the 5.0 makes 800hp with a Whipple and a warranty. You also get to keep your man card.

@@user-sv3yr2jd3z Yup I just got mine tuned on E85 and it makes 420 to the wheels now. That’s from 330 stock to 420 with just tune. The eco boost is solid for bolt on and tune. But that’s max, the coyote will handle forced induction in anyway

@@user-sv3yr2jd3z you will have to keep your “man” card in your shirt pocket because it will take everything in your wallet and then some to put a whipple on it

@@paulhunter9613 I don't even own an f150. I own a powerstroke puts more hp to the tire than 99.9% of any ecoboost out there. A Whipple 5.0 is penny's compared to building a diesel and a big factor in why I'm considering switching. The ecoboost is not capable of doing what I want the 5.0 is. It is so much more than the ecoboost, better in every way. Even ford who pushed ecoboost with everything in them finally seen the light. They got curb stomped by the TRX. What engine did they fight back with? Not a lame 6 cylinder.

I knew it too because these guys are Ford fan boys and their test are always have Ford winning to bad it is fake .My hemi has never lost to a Ford ecojunk.

Eric s which state you live in if South Carolina got one for ya

I live in Canada full of libtards out here but I love south Carolina.@@dominicanscuf1772

My buddy ordered his Tundra 5.7L from the factory with the TRD supercharger making 504 HP and 550 ft lbs tq. It will *MURDER* even tuned 3.5L ecoboosts. Everybody likes to ignore the fact that you can order a Tundra from the factory with the TRD (Toyota Racing Development) supercharger, complete with factory warranty intact.

Eric s that’s the biggest lie I’ve ever heard LMAOOOO

me too!

Me too, I love my truck

Me too , everyone says it doesnt sound tough well listen and look at Mike Tyson!!!!

Supposedly the 2.7 is faster than the 3.5

Until it breaks down...

Moral of the story people are gullible and beleive anything they see on the internet.

If you can deal with the turbo lag

Turbo for power not for reliability.

Until heat soak kicks in...

Daniel Heller true, but that was with the 6-speed transmission. Since both ecoboosts use the 10 speed now, I think the 3.5 is a bit faster

It is the most popular engine... but is not quicker than the 3.5EB gen2

its only interesting to people that drive that terd. If your truck is not a v8 , you likely squat to pee

@@chaznad5411what happened a little eco boost whip your v8’s ass?

I traded my 2.7eco for a 3.5 eco and it's waaaaaay quicker

I was fairly close to the EcoBoost. I would've liked to see it against the others as well.

I wanna see them with matching gear ratios. 3.55 or 3.31 both. I find it odd the ecoboost had 3.31 most of them are 3.73 and some 3.55.

@@braaap850 Can't ... The EcoBoost would smoke the tires with 3.73's

@@CGF1214 You act like the coyote is slow! They are so close in power it is barely noticeable. I gaurantee there would be less than a half a truck length between these trucks if they both had the same gears. 5.0 lost by 1 length and 3.15 gears when the ecoboost had 3.31.

They don’t own the trucks

Oslec Liedbag mine started having problems at 26k. Took a big loss to unload that turd.

Found On Road Dead. wanna know how to fix a ford? just but a chevy :)

@@bigdaddyvince182 buy an older chevy. I dont like the new design!

Vincent Novick gmc Give Me Cock, you trucks are transgender trucks, look like a Toyota non locking diff just all sorts of over priced shit

For people who want a product that’s ready to go the F-150 is a great truck. For guys like me who modify and want room to build they’re a bad buy. Turbo’s or not I’m not buying a pickup with a 6 cylinder in it.

Jason Whitlock 😂😂🎯 alotta internet mechanics

Savage ass 😂😂😂

No complaints, just wish they'd have had turbos on all the trucks. Forced vs natural aspiration isn't a fair race, the turbos on that 3.5 give it 75% of its hp lmao

@@Kodiak-xk5dc Don't want a V6 truck? You should get a Ranger or Colorado they have a 4 cylinder option.

Funny thing is the 2.7 is faster 0-60 and to the 1/4 mile than the 3.5 😂

Doc's Vendetta Ride Why?

Yep, the 2.7 ecoboost is even quicker than its Big brother, the 3.5 in stock form. Once reprogrammed or upping the boost, the 3.5 becomes the winner over the 2.7 and both become miles ahead of any other truck in existence including any V8.

@@ColdSmokes plus less weight

Kind of looks that way.

Alot

InnerGuide. Nothing official from ford itself. There is unofficial f150 from Hennessy and Roush. But they all cost $90k plus. Some are all about performance on the street. Some around making the raptor look slow not as off road worthy.

It's Limited

@@jldude84 I disagree after looking at the drive ratios for each transmission in each truck. Nissan may have a taller first gear, but both Ford and GM have more power oriented drive ratios in the middle of the transmission. A 3.15 or 3.31 axle ratio between these trucks will have a noticeable advantage over other competitors. I think the reason why the Nissan can hang is because the VK56VD maintains a pretty good torque/hp curve.

Should have done a top speed ungoverned run..totan would have got em

Found On Reservation Dump

Fix Or Repair Daily

Found On Roadside Dead

Really tough beer can

@@eduardohemi6091 yeah dumbass people talk shit about aluminum when it’s probably what their vehicle rides on... aluminum wheels 😂😂😂

@@freedomisntfree_44 aluminum body . A little kid with a rock can ruin your whole truck

@@freedomisntfree_44 you need a vehicle 10x lighter than everyone else’s in order to slightly edge on them lol. Fords junk

My two freinds saw bigfoot and a unicorn having sex lmao.

@@erics9754 lol

Roasted HD I have a 2017 2.7 eco boost and lemme tell you I’ve smoked mustangs to BMWs with this truck idk why so many people hate

Nope they wont

I eat dodges and fords trucks everyday I have a 2016 6.2 GMC sierra and it smokes them all........come get some and it's still stock! but a supercharger coming soon......

Imagine if they (the 2 Fords) ran a decent gear ratio in the rear end for this race???? The 3.15 and 3.31 are the two slowest rear-ends Ford makes. If they ran the 3.55 locker or the 3.73, it would have been even more embarrassing for the GM, Dodge and what ever else those were.

@@bryonscheer2759 well too bad it's slower than a V6. LOL!!!

@@nickhowell168 yeah No so go drive your 1999 ford Ranger!!!

Cool Squad damn what drugs are u on fords are trash

Fords rule. Chevys drool.

Norm Ross Fords crash chevy just dash on by 😂

@@normross1426 you 12?

More faster? Maybe you should take some online grammar lessons.

No it's not... I have the 3.5EB gen2 and test drove both 3.5EB and 2.7EB prior to my purchase.... the 2.7 feels faster from the start but runs out of steam in high rpms.. the 3.5EB pulls harder with a longer meatier torque curve all the way to the redline.... which makes the 3.5EB quicker

Just check the numbers

I have had both, sold the 3.5.and I have a 2.7 now and stock this 2.7 truck is faster and that's a fact for sure. And I know it would beat my 2013 3.5L to 100 mph everytime. Just because the 3.5 has more.horse doesnt.mean it's a faster truck.

what difference does it make?

@@olivierr.5752 Quite a bit. One mile above sea level puts the oxygen density to be less reducing natural aspirated engines by 15 to 20% power. the eco boost having 2 turbos makes up for that to some degree.

@@bryankeenan4803 oh ok I see. Thank you for explaining

The EcoBoost still wins...

@@kylesonsalla7620 video link?

The 3.5 is actually heavier than the 5.0 but it's worth every ounce.

The other trucks were 4x4. the two Fords were 2 wheel drive sooooo

Non Ya the ecoboost was 4x4 the coyote was a 2x4

@@quinnleverett4793 Why because it had tow hooks...had a 96 Dodge 3/4 2 wheel drive that had tow hooks

@@taylorswiftnumberon1 Negative....the Ecoboost was a 4X4. Don't go letting sour grapes get in the way of facts.

Non Ya no cause he literally said it was 4 wheel drive

190k on my 2012 3.5. Over half the miles towing 5 to 6 thousand pound box trailer. No problem at all pulling in the mountains in colorado. I'll definitely be getting another. Timing chain rattles if I let the oil go over 4k but this truck has made me a shit ton of money and put a smile on my face doing it.

The 5.0 coyote should be second place

The result would be: 1. 3.5L Ecoboost 2. 5.0L N/A 3. 6.2 N/A Really it wouldn't have made a big difference...

@Porky WithAPistol raptor doesn't compete

The hellcat ram will beat the raptor

Porky WithAPistol you sound like someone who read something false and decided to repeat it on here.

@@jabroni6199 You mean ford's own media white paper that said they only expect 170k miles out of the ecoboost engines?

@@MrJcjet post link, make sure it actually says exactly what you just said it said

That was the best part lol

Yeah

Funny how it's terrible, but it's practically the second fastest truck in this line up...

My 2.7 was stupid quick. Fastest truck I've owned. I've had a many V8s and they just didn't compare.

Yup. People running in the high 11s with just a tune.

Why would a smaller engine be faster when they're both twin turbos? Serious question.

@@slydog75 A hair lighter and the power curve (transmission is the same)

i own a 2.7 and it is jerky in sport and when i looked it on google, ford made the 2.7 the most jerky with the trans.

U do know that texas exists

Brandolyn- Games 🤣🤣🤣

Rado Animations it's the same as the GMC so there would be no point

That's why I Whipple supercharger my 6.2 and no more worries lol. Plenty of sad challengers too...

No

yeah but the 2.7 is faster

My CarKilledU its faster 0-60 after 60 the 3.5 will destroy the 2.7. It’s already been proven just watch any video out there

@@ZACH_95_ And it's also faster if you have any payload in or towing behind it even 0-60. The 3.5 is the king.

Yeah. It’s even better in the Ford GT MK II, which makes an astonishing 700 HORSEPOWER from that engine!

Because everything here would shit all over the 5.3L. That engine has ZERO chance of even holding its ground against any of the trucks in this video except for maybe the naturally aspirated V6 Ram.

Lol that was my point Chevy had to send there big motor in to keep up with the others. The 5.3 is at the bottom of the barrel. Even ram sent a v6 knowing it wouldn’t do good but yet they still did it Chevy wouldn’t even send there 5.3

Slowwwwwweee

@@papyro8054 wrong dummy...the 5.3 is NOT "the bottom of the heap", the 5.3 is a very strong running motor for it's displacement. It puts out 350 horsepower and around the same in torque right off the lot. Chevrolet makes a 4.3 V6 and a 4.8 V8 and they're good strong motors. The ONLY reason Ford's 3.5 V6 is so strong is that it has TWO turbochargers!

Then why do they always send there 6.2 and not the 5.4 even ram sent a v6 along with there v8 and it does not have a turbo on it. Chevy always does this in all these tests. If they would of sent the 5.3 it would of came in last out of all the v8 models!

I have a 2.7 ecoboost and having driven the coyote for a week I was not impressed. The 2.7 is faster. However I don't think any of the non turbos should even try to race any of the 3 ecoboosts. I would like to see the coyote against the other V8's.

EB would still win.

If the titan had a decent rear end gear ratio, it probably would have beat the GMC.

To be honest, had the Titan had something like the ram had in the rear (3.92) it might have beat even the eco boost. I mean it held on against the gmc really closely but had a wayyy taller rear end ratio. That things a beast, and that’s coming from a ford guy lol.

Imagine if the ecoboost had the 3.73 though

Nissan has something there, just need to put more money into the platform.

So why wouldn't you buy the v-6?

@@slydog75bc most of us truck owner/drivers don't look into buying a truck for efficiency or to save gas. I will never drive anything less than a v-8 on a pick up and gladly wave the ecoboost engine trucks past me cause they will never sound as good mine does, plus a supercharger would fix that real quick without sacrificing the sound.

@@roniebonilla8611 lol at the supercharger combo. You'd go spend an additional 8-10 grand just to keep up with a ecoboost. And heaven forbid the eco owner goes aftermarket turbos and tune. The HO 3.5 makes 455/510. Imagine what that will be with a good tune. Most truck owners aren't going to justify spending close to ten grand extra just to beat a factory truck configuration. I own a 2014 f150 5.0, and it's a turd compared to the new 5.0, which is a turd compared to the ecoboost. I get that truck guys love the v8 sound. But sound doesn't do any work. I towed a trailer and car to Georgia and back, and got out accelerated up a massive grade by an ecoboost f150 pulling a gigantic camper trailer. I was struggling at 45 in 3rd and he went by me like I was sitting still.

TWIN TURBO V6

Well quick, it's as capable as the rest lets be clear.... Ford ppl are just sad. sorry they all about the same thats a fact and facts matter.

A raptor? 🤦‍♂️ in that case should of brought out the yenko silverado

It probably because the Raptor isnt a stock vehicle. I think these guys should drag SVT vs SRT vehicles

@@ronaldworster6640 How is it not stock? It's a vehicle built by a department within the company. All components are factory components, manufactured by Ford, with a full manufacturer's warranty. SVT is a division within Ford. Ford doesn't send it out to be modified. (Like Roush or Hennessey) I happened to see someone driving in a Roush modified Raptor, today. HOLY CRAP!!! Now THAT is not a stock vehicle, by any means. LOL

The 5.0 was lighter with it being 2wd

Shut your pussy ass up. Ford better than all these trucks just facts 🤣

The new rams are butt ugly. They look like the old dodge durangos from the 90s. Atleast Ford is an American company

42 years #1 selling truck for a reason

Ram, gm and Toyota all three look like they are trying everything to capitalize on ford sales...and still cant do it..even nissan fronted a contract for a Cummins to boost its sales and poor little ram got a penestar v6....what does fiat know about trucks....mmmm nothing...

Yeah it would. The coyote is a beast

Well I have a 2018 5.0L with 3.73 rear end.... My buddy has a 2013 5.7 RAM with only 35,000kms and the 5.0 smokes it in a race.... I have no experience against a newer RAM, but at least my buddy has to keep quiet about his big fancy HEMI haha!

Why do the km matters? And what does the hemi have for the rear ?

CloneTrooper55 Gaming I’m not sure what the rear end in the HEMI is.... And I say 35,000kms because my F150 has 5,000kms and it’s not like I’m racing a 5 year old RAM with 250,000kms on it.... Just pointing out that’s it’s got low kms.

Yeah, I'd like to see the Coyote vs Hemi vs 6.2. WTG Ecoboost!

Ecoboost is fantastic at both. Best of both worlds.

Yes. Lol

2022 it's obviously just between lightning and the rivian. They aren't good at a lot of truck stuff but they are not going to get beat at drag racing by any combustion engine

@@Eric-zs6rd eh those trucks can't even tow 100 miles without running out of range, they shouldn't be in the tests.

5.3 is slooooooooow.

Better than the ram 6 cylinder a little slower than the Ram 5.7....

5.3's are slugs

At a mile above sea level, I would be more concerned if they weren't.

Shawn Elliott the 5.0 ford had the same disadvantage as the rest of the trucks yet it was 2nd fastest. The only one with the advantage was the 3.5 ecoboost.

No ford has beaten my hemi with 3.92 gears yet so I am sure this was fixed.

Peter Jamieson put a tundra in there and see what happens

Peter Jamieson more speed= less torque therefore fastest truck is the weakest

While your '97 may be made of steel and appear "solid" because of it, don't let that fool you into believing the 10th Gen trucks were/are any more sturdy, or safe than any generation built after them. Have you ever seen the amount of frame and body flex on a 10th Gen F150? How about their crash ratings? They were absolutely dismal for their time. If you pit any 10th Gen F150 against a current 13th Gen, it would lose badly in every conceivable category. Yes, they're pricey and yes they're complex....but that's simply a reflection of the industry and inflation adjustment. Not to mention options found on a full blown Lariat of the 90's era can be had on even the most basic of models today. Don't let nostalgia, ignorance and personal bias get in the way of cold hard facts when it comes to making an "informed" decision. As far as engine choice goes. The Ecoboost isn't for everyone. Despite the unarguable superiority of the package itself, some guys just "need" to hear that V8 growl under hood when they press the loud pedal. Heck...I'm one of them...but I recognise that I'm giving up a "superior platform" for the sake of nostalgia and personal bias. That being the case....the Coyote is probably the best V8 Ford (or most any manufacturer for that matter) has built in the last 40-years.

My dad still has his 97 he bought off the lot, 358K and still going! Sure, you can somewhat tell the 4.6's age but no real motor problems. Only have had replace/re-machined heads after 250k(??) But still a very solid work truck.

I’m a Ford guy myself. I own a 07 5.4, and a 17 3.5. Fact is the 3.5 will out pull, out tow and still win a drag race than just about anything in its class, and it is a safer vehicle to boot.....

Mine to it has 300,000 an still gets me to work everyday

I go with and stay with what works my friend . Like I said , I'm a Ford guy thru and thru , and far from ignorant ... please believe that , so don't try to educate me , or take me to school so to speak , as far as trucks go , I've pulled , hauled , towed , stump jerked , hammered on , overworked pushed to the limit and bent Fords , Chevy , Dodges , Jeeps , etc ... if you've done the same , Welcome to the Working Man's Real World Country Cub . Yes , the Coyote 5.0 is bad ass !! As is the old 300 - S6 Might be the only thing we agree on , other than that ..... You Say Tomoto ... Is Say Tomato !! Peace Out - MW

You're not a GM lover if you was you would have known that he didn't really put the power down in that GM Truck!

idk man, i have the 3,5 and i get 14 mpg, most stop and go traffic tho

@@ThePauldunbar :very true, indeed.

@@ThePauldunbar and they only perform that well a mile above sea level.

Only wins by the turbo set up in the high elevation my 6.2 is way way faster than the ecoturds

Vincent Moreno - That's because they can't compete!

They had a fricken Siera. WTF

Loulovesspeed did you not see the Sierra?

@@T3CHK1NG54 Sierras are much better built than junky Chevy's.

@@MrKnuckles8978 same exact frickin powertrains on a Silverado & Sierra (samr model years) you tool...smh. ONLY differences are styling on body parts.

Stanley Kania ahemmmm dodge

Nor Rams

Yep not rams

Kyler the Ram’s 6.4 is in a 2500 not a 1500 tho

Kyler lol dodge dont got crap on the new ecoboost 470hp 510 ft-lbs in the new raptor engine thats a 3.5l

Logan Hudson new 2019 Limited with the HO 3.5 EcoBoost will be awesome. 450hp/510 on tap for a lighter truck will be cool