Тёмный
No video :(

What the Supreme Court decision overturning Chevron deference means to you 

Federal News Network
Подписаться 1,3 тыс.
Просмотров 9 тыс.
50% 1

Read the transcript here: federalnewsnet...
The Supreme Court last week overturned a 40 year precedent. In a case brought by New England fisherman, the court reversed what's been know as Chevron deference. In the 1984 case, the courts said judges should generally defer to federal agencies when rules they make are reasonable, and the enabling law was ambiguous. Last week's decision reverses that thinking. For what this may mean for agency rulemaking operations, the Federal Drive with Tom Temin turned to the chair of the Administrative Conference of the United States, Andy Fois.

Опубликовано:

 

22 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 34   
@user-ix3zs1iz3t
@user-ix3zs1iz3t Месяц назад
It was legalized extortion it took forty years to get it done.
@chanelv5373
@chanelv5373 12 дней назад
Excellent breakdown. Simple terms for everyone to understand. Thank you Tom.
@renereed3023
@renereed3023 Месяц назад
Unelected agencies empowering,& imposing fines, is unconstitutional.
@jkdaprynce
@jkdaprynce Месяц назад
Hopefully this brings the price of all fish down a bit, not just herring.
@SkareMii
@SkareMii Месяц назад
Ha!
@John-lj8rv
@John-lj8rv Месяц назад
It means deprivation of rights under color of law comes to an end after forty long unconstitutional years.
@markhagerman3072
@markhagerman3072 3 дня назад
Closer to ninety years.
@jakebrown6291
@jakebrown6291 Месяц назад
This is a good thing removing the Chevron Deference.
@CVenza
@CVenza 6 дней назад
How will the general public be able to approach this new rule to apply to their legal matters now? Where do they begin?
@markhagerman3072
@markhagerman3072 Месяц назад
This is a great decision! If an agency's leaders believe the agency needs additional authority, beyond that prescribed in existing law, the correct approach is for the agency to draft legislation providing for that, and send the draft to Congress along with a request for it to be passed.
@katiek.8808
@katiek.8808 3 дня назад
This is how it happens. What they do is vote on fill in the blank pages.
@DerpMcDerp101
@DerpMcDerp101 Месяц назад
These courts have been able to turn purple into green for far to long.
@jimolson9649
@jimolson9649 17 дней назад
Government is but an agency to the state the state being the sovereign people.
@jimolson9649
@jimolson9649 17 дней назад
Will this decision Force judges to operate an article 3 Court rather than a military court?
@dennishowland7495
@dennishowland7495 Месяц назад
How about the wind farm in the ocean.that make no sense
@Sagora123
@Sagora123 Месяц назад
So, not at all worried about our water-ways being poisoned from fracking/chemicals, not concerned about regulations and standards for what’s deemed safe? You’re saying it’s good to not defer to a separate panel filled with experts when we do have ambiguous laws that ultimately affect our lives. So if your land becomes contaminated, you do not want to have a higher governing body to ensure companies like BP and Exxon do not skimp on regulations? Meaning, because the court says so, that’s it? No more oversight? I’m confused why people see this as a good thing. Power? Supreme Court justices just granted more power to the president recently. You can trust that they’ll do the same for the people?
@shelbystepp8462
@shelbystepp8462 Месяц назад
this is an incredibly underrated comment and spot on
@RolandSchitt
@RolandSchitt Месяц назад
You fail to comprehend just how brain damaged the Trump cult is
@sshomesteaders1776
@sshomesteaders1776 Месяц назад
I hear you but respectively disagree ......the Congress needs to get off their butts and create common sense laws that will protect us......a 3 or 4 letter agency does NOT have the best interests of the people of this country, those 3 or 4 letter agencies only do what whatever the ruling parties want
@RolandSchitt
@RolandSchitt Месяц назад
@@sshomesteaders1776 A. You sound like a Fox "news" junkie B. Do you trust Marjorie "The Hillbilly" Taylor Greene and Lauren "The prostitute" Boebert to create quality laws?
@mikefowler301
@mikefowler301 Месяц назад
Oh yeah full of experts my arse, How old are you and have you ever had to deal with bureaucrats? Well I have, If you think for one minute our world is going to be polluted because YOUR so called experts can't create laws/impose nasty arse fines then you need to move to europe. Who is the best expert for interpreting law? Fricken judges DUH!!!! not your so called experts, They need to get a law passed do it the same way the PEOPLE do, through congress. Jeebus you people think were gonna turn into china.
@jimtwodogs3084
@jimtwodogs3084 Месяц назад
The first nature of business is to feather your own nest.
@mikefowler301
@mikefowler301 Месяц назад
Ignorance must be bliss huh buddy? 1984 is when chevron came into being They took the power from the "Judicial" and gave it to the "executive" branch, They just now figured out this craps unconstitutional so they took it back. You need a brain.
Далее
Goodbye Chevron Doctrine: #ATF Furious!
22:55
Просмотров 201 тыс.
IMF's Georgieva on Economic Impact of Generative AI
17:35
What is the Chevron Doctrine?
2:17
Просмотров 13 тыс.
Time to Revisit Chevron Deference?
1:25:33
Просмотров 5 тыс.