When a slasher villain breaks into a gun owner's home 

I fear it's kinda realistic

*literally California*

Weapons were better back in my days

@@Dark_Peace I own an arming sword for home defense

Its not like real bad guys use Guns nowadays...

shotguns be better weapon fast reload time if u got short 1 and shells are big and able reload fast

@The blue fox overlord I disagree. I'd say a rifle like an ar-15 is the superior home defense weapon. And reloading takes a couple seconds.

Honestly so does owning swords

@@josiahjackson3757 I agree, a rifle is the best thing for home defense, any missed shots penetrate the walls and alert my neighbors.

@@josiahjackson3757 i also disagree. Tear gas grenade is clearly the easiest and most effective way to separate intruder from themselves and push them out the house

The Great Equalizer

Yep, in the art of Smith and Wesson.

Taw Khan do be like:

Thai Kwon do. THAI KWON DO. It's taekwondo. Please.

Me being a 3rd degree black belt in karate: "Uhmmmm... you said you're in my house? Okay. Check the bedroom closet. You should see a gi and belt, so you know what you're getting into. There's more weapons in there if you need them too. I got plenty down here."

@@Gacha_gays gacha gay

"Fight me like a man." "How about I turn the insides of your head into the outsides instead?"

Lol

@@Jungleali Seriously, though. Even OC spray followed by some axe work would deal with a nutjob like this quite thoroughly.

"Fight me on MY terms where I have the advantage!"

And, oddly enough, real people trying to punch/stab gun wielders to death.

We all get video recommendations for "fastest draw competition" and have to practice!

Completely safe

Absolutely. I'm doing it right now.

I actually do swing guns soooo.... this is totally possible.

Yeah we keep it loaded while spinning

I mean, if they overstepped their authority, definitely.

@@kingol4801 Certainly the bank robber over stepped his authoritah. Yes.

Ghost face’s power is in having teammates. Good luck trying to aim on one of them when the other one is creeping right behind you (kinda “Clever girl” moment in Jurassic Park).

which, as long as you dont leave him on the nanite healing table after you blow him to hell, will work

Yeah, his real horror factor comes from all the stalking he does prior to the kill to prepare. He knows your patterns well, cause he's been spying on you for the last month. Take that away, he's just a creepy sneaky dude with a knife.

How so?

@@writer5790 a disarmed person makes it a whole lot easier for the slasher to slash.

@@apinecone2753 wouldn't the "slasher" just use a gun?

@@writer5790 Hence why the potential victim should always have a gun too. Firearms are the universal equilizer.

@@writer5790 yeah, but criminals will always have guns, because if I'm going to break laws why would I care how many I'm breaking, instead the question becomes what does the victim have to defend themselves

Yep happened in Florida. Some dumbass broke into the people's home while they were on vacation for 2 weeks somehow got stuck in the garage and lived off dog food all that time along with water out of the inside garden hose and he sued and won. America people where criminals have more rights than you.

Doesn't mean you aren't going to jail.

@@byronsenior6499 Most states have "stand your ground" and "castle doctrine" laws, so youre typically safe to defend yourself with lethal force on your own property

@@Styrac Oh, guess that's more of a US thing.

@@byronsenior6499 Might be. I know some countries basically don’t allow self defense. (And I’m not talking about specifically with a gun but in general)

Someone once sued someone cause he got shot by a booby trap when he was breaking into a house And won

@@Aresenal1739 Who was his lawyer, Fletcher Reede? Lmao

@@Aresenal1739 how? that's insane.

@@spencerreid2086 Short story: if I remember right, it had something to do with the booby trap being unreasonable force to protect property while the home owners were gone Long story: here’s a 21 minute video that goes over the story, the court case verbal argument, and the conclusion’s reasoning ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-bV9ppvY8Nx4.htmlsi=1NyazxsnYnzcRNM2

zach star alfred: hey look bruce, THAT GUY will never kill anyone else ever again. maybe you should give that some fucking thought.

@@jackadams3878 I don't think that you understand the (in-universe) reasoning behind Batman. I fully acknowledge that the various universes of DC don't make sense under scrutiny... (I doubt you actually want me to defend Batman storytelling, and others have done way better than I. TLDR; a major point of Batman being Batman, is that it is not healthy and he is self-destructive... but he is self-destructive in the least self-destructive way he can manage.

@@coltondodger For me batman is the only "hero" with a good reason why he doesn't want to kill. He knows that if he does it he won't be able to stop because he acknowledges his mind isn't right.

Not sure if thats even scientifically possible.

In defence of Scream it's meant to be a sort of parody of horror

@@johnsmith8981 Isn't that The scary movie and not Scream?

@@currentlyaliveanddead6733 scream is a parody, and scary movie is a parody of scream

I too long for that day.

Except most of them have some kind of immortality/super-durability.

Maybe he "missed" another way, we never saw it... Follow up for the next movie!

Idk, the Scream villains tend to die every movie, though they're also like a hydra, spawning more everytime you "cut off their heads"

The joke in future videos could be that he gets replaced by a different Ghost Face, following the trend of the movies.

Of course lol! Bad guys are made of meat and they aren't freaking Army Rangers or anything. Shoot them and you don't get stabbed.

@@homerman76 They don't use enough fire, once reduced to ash, it can't regenerate.

To spin on our fingers

To defend themselves from slasher villains.

Because the 2nd Amendment exists

@@phantom6276 murica

Not everyone needs them, slasher villains don't they need knives. But everyone else needs them.

An armed civilian, correcting myself before someone else can

I'd watch it.

Giving away great ideas, but probably won't see it because it's harmful to the mainstream agenda

That would be awesome! A serial killer who's loved ones were killed by a "slasher villain".

So the punisher?

“Of course I am. That’s why I bought a gun.”

​ @K. W. Pillsbury Yeah it's called living in the real world. Even ignoring the fact that bears and wolves exist, a knife will kill you, so unless you want to spend years becoming a competent dagger fighter, and then still losing because once you get hand-to-hand victory is basically a coinflip, a gun is the right reaction. It's called taking your safety into your own hands and not trusting security theatre to do it for you. Feeling safe and being safe ain't the same thing; sometimes fear is the appropriate reaction.

@@k.w.pillsbury4070 Some of us live in the real world. I had a break in. I had a gun. It didn’t end well for the intruder. I was able to keep my family safe, because I had a gun. I bet it’s really easy to be calling others chicken over the internet for having the means and will to defend themselves when you’ve never been in a life or death situation yourself. But in the real world, people like you are the ones who end up on the news in articles like “guy who has break in robbed and pistol whipped 50 times” or “missing family found dead in river after being kidnapped and held as hostages for 3 days.” You’re far from the first person to have said that gun owners are scared or paranoid. But we aren’t; we just choose to be prepared instead of living in a fantasy where we’re all safe and nobody ever has to defend themselves. I also own a fire extinguisher. I guess I’m terrified of fires./s

@@QualityPen WOOAAH BROO. I am 100% in favor of gun ownership to prevent situations of harm. I can’t tell you how many guns are in my current home. I think you may have misread my intentions. What I meant was “Yes, I am afraid or punks like you. That’s why I bought a gun to defend myself.” I was in no way calling gun owners senseless cowards, or saying they’re weak for having a gun.

A gun will only protect you from a distance, so if your house is small a knife is more than capable of taking down the hero-with-a-gun. Maybe you need a kevlar body armour as well as a gun? Something to keep you safe long enough to get the gun aimed.

Until he runs out of ammo. Or ends up drawing hordes of zombies to his house due to the report of the firearm. Or finds out that hitting a moving target in the head is harder than it looks.

Real guns tend to be quite bad in those hypothetical situations, since you won’t have Hollywood’s infinite ammo clip.

That's some appropriate fear that leads to respecting others' personal property.

"If violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended victim who can do it. The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge nor jury. Therefore what he must be taught to fear is his victim." -Jeff Cooper

*private property

@@cypherpunk121 *home. You could be living in an apartment, and not own the place. Or be staying at a friend's home.

@@godlikemachine645 "personal" property doesn't exist. You either own something or you don't.

He seems to be relatively centered, I think

The key to entertainment is to never single out a portion of your base. Keep yourself ambiguous to all. Fire off in every direction

He just calls out the absurdities in everyday life regardless of the side.

Not everything needs to be about politics.

@@peris_arts_film9699 Yep, never take a stance, make fun of everyone and everything.

@Muntean Andrei funny thing is I was wondering why is he uploading daily, then I remember it's Christmas!

I can agree, even tho I'm not Christian

Best thing ever

@@Dr._Bo You don't need to be Christian to celebrate Christmas. I'm not religious at all and I still love the holiday.

@@Dr._Bo Bruh I know someone who's an atheist and celebrates Christmas, it doesn't matter lol

Should just…brought a gun

Honestly it is from a statistical standpoint; there are many times more successful defensive uses than even total gun deaths counting everything from murder to suicide to accidental discharge, orders of magnitude more uses. Most of the time it's present, make them crap themselves and run away, not even a shot fired. But in the other cases yeah, knife and gun are equal force, both deadly weapons, so absolutely you shoot down a nutbag with a knife.

I agree, although the main character scared me more

@@giin97 To be exact, total gun deaths range from 30k-40k including suicides, homicides, etc. while defensive uses of guns range from 60k-2.5M so even if we use the low end, that's still way more defensive uses.

You got a source for those figures?

Do you even watch his videos? Lmao be makes political statements all the time.

@@Boudiccanyc Where did I say he NEVER makes statements? My only point is that he's capable of making videos of such subjects without doing so.

@@ACEGAMER120 without making a political statement == without making any political statement. Review your logic. If he just makes one political statement, your main comment is wrong

@@truestopguardatruestop164 no, that's not how that works. @ACEGAMER120 merely said that zach has managed to make fun of a lot of topics without making a political statement, with each case being independent of each other. Now this does not say that Zach HASN'T made political statements in SOME videos; it merely states that he has made fun of many controversial topics without making a political statement in those individual videos.

This thread is a certified reddit moment.

Are you suggesting that coconuts migrate?

@@Huntermarvin Not at all, they could be carried!

@@Huntermarvin but the flight mass of a single African swallow would never carry a coconut.

@@alexzanderroberts995 wait a minute, suppose 2 swallows could carry them together!

Lol, already been said above, and yeah, it is 😂

i am that one guy.

Also muzzle discipline

@@killer13324 oh my God it's Jormungand Bourne

it is

Me starts speaking japanese and draws a katana

Same, lol.

Same asf

oddly enough, not the LEAST responsible I've seen. Don't watch Brandon Herrera's Darwin Award videos.

@@mutilator97 *fires RPG into the air*

@@mutilator97 I mean this guy spun it around by the trigger with it spinning into his face down barrel. Basically a darwin award

@@ML-sc3pt in his videos there’s a video of a man sitting on the barrel of a shotgun and giving himself a high speed colonoscopy

uh.. bro???? did u ever find out what it was???????

C’mon we gotta know what happened!

Is the belt ok???

@@Vivisectional He's dead, he finally found him

@@thehermitman822 The belt is fine, it freaks me out every time I see it though (I try to leave it exactly where it was for evidence just in case something did happen and the police actually cared to investigate). Its well worn, size 36 waist (for comparison I'm very skinny at size 29" waist), and its stamped with a floral pattern.

Same in Italy

Reasons as to why we don't live there lol

Slaves don't have rights

That's just absurd... on multiple levels.

Well, he didn't do the approved method of response! Come on, he should have pretended to be sleeping! Simple as that, we all know that if you pretend to sleep everything will be okay! Our politicians say so!!!!!!!

It's happened. Look for them, you can find articles.

@@immikeurnot Whatever happened to right and wrong? I think if you are knowingly committing a crime your rights should be forfeit. A criminal breaks into someones home, gets shot and sues them. Where is the judge that says "If you weren't breaking into his home you wouldn't be in a wheelchair."

@@eviljoshy3402 Any self-defense should be proportional to the level of immediate danger. Shooting some robber dead for trying to steal cash/a watch is objectively morally wrong.

@@kingol4801 I'm of the opinion that breaking into someone's home for any reason is morally wrong.

yes. if you are already with your gun in your hand and the villain calls you to alert the fact he is in your house, is pretty effective.

@@PROPAROXITONO I think you're missing the point. If someone's there to kill you (whether because you're a slasher villain invading their home, or the person who's home they're invading), police response time of even one minute is longer than you likely have before you're dead or seriously injured. Not sure about you, but I'd rather be alive to face my consequences than dead because I had to wait for the "right people" to come with their weapons.

@@KuraiLunae because people are targetting to kill you? I don't think that any western country is so fucked up, that this is a normal assumption. You could also be attacked by a bear while you are sitting at home if we are just making random shit up. Do you have a bear-deterrent spay around - just in case? Because a grizzley won't care much if he gets shot 1 or 2 times and the spray could help instead.

@@KuraiLunae You are statistically more likely to be killed by your own gun, or kill a family member with your own gun, than be killed by a home invader. You're also more likely to have your home invaded if you own guns because criminals want to sell those guns on the black market.

@@KuraiLunae but I said that the gun is pretty effective to defend you, that's not contradicting what I said. it is effective IF you are with the gun in your hand, the people invading your house call you alerting you they are there, and the person invading is using a knife, not a gun too. because if you are a responsible adult, you will keep your gun in a safe place, in a drawer where a kid can't find and whatever. and I don't know in the USA, I'm Brazillian, but here bandits don't usually alert you that they are invading, normally they enter your house quietly or when you open the door to attend them, which doesn't give you this precious minute to get your gun. and even if you get and the person who invaded your house suspect you will get your gun, he will shoot you before you have the chance to shoot him. and that isn't something in my head. there are statistics about that. just look for how much people "protect themselves" with guns and how much these same guns are used to kill an innocent, to suicide, or get stoled by the bandit and used in others crimes.

I've had my friends for 13 years. Yea.

With the other foster kids, sure.

Oh jeez, I'm going to have nightmares tonight now 😂

The great clown craze of '19-'20...

I sure hope husbands and wives aren’t blood relatives. Inbreeding can be a real problem.

Secretly it takes place in an alternate universe where the second amendment wasn’t expanded beyond what it meant. The right to bear arms only applies to forming a militia

It’s not impossible, though. It’s not like every household has a gun.

@@Skullhawk13 You have a reading comprehension problem, as well as a gross misunderstanding of what a militia is. "...[T]he right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." That's a pretty clear enumeration of a personal right. And the phrase about the militia very clearly does not mitigate that. In fact, the phrase about the militia directly implies that the formation of a militia is impossible without an individual right to firearm ownership and goes on to state, in no uncertain terms, that a "free state" is impossible without that right. You might not like the Second Amendment, but it says what it says.

@@MrMagnaniman that’s so interesting how you cite the expanded definition as of a Supreme Court ruling beyond the founders intention and make the exact same expanded definition. Private gun ownership was not a right for all citizens by default. You can go to the NRA circle-jerk all you want, but I don’t actually care about the people who are lifting restrictions on gun ownership when we’re the only country on earth to have yearly mass shootings and several per year. But sure I have a misunderstanding. You also automatically assumed I was against private gun ownership just because it’s not what the founders intended. I think having hand guns as a self-defense option is fine I just disagree with heavier firepower being so easily obtained. I don’t really base my morals on what 200 year old slave owners thought was right. There is no level where anything you have to say has even a tiny merit. You should really look into the history here from more than one source, So you can overcome your ignorance here. If RU-vid didn’t delete comments with links I’d gladly show you several sources.

@@MrMagnaniman the original definition and meaning was basically a State’s right to have citizen soldiers. It’s been usurped by the national guard. It was not about individual rights. It wasn’t until after the civil war the modern interpretation was decided by the Supreme Court.

Good reason not to invade another person's home.

Or an open carry permit

Or, you know, a normal person.

@@giin97 A normal person doesn't try to chase a guy with a knife or shoots him imo. Killing somebody isn't fun for normal people. It's why you have cops who after being charged by a person and shooting them puking their guts out and such. Also, you know, illegal. First thing necessary to claim self defense in the US is having a realistic belief of physical harm.(not saying this isn't the case somewhere else, focussing on the US here) And no, things like castle doctrine don't apply for this. It means he doesn't need to retreat from his home(like, if he could reach the backdoor of his house or something, I'll still call anyone not doing that an idiot and if it results in somebody dying a murderer, legal or not). The realistic belief for physical harm still needs to apply. A guy on his ass with a hand on the phone and a gun pointed towards him was 0 threat in this case.

@@Londronable ah, you were referring specifically to his eagerness to clear his dwelling. I took it more generally as a declaration that only sociopaths own guns. My mistake.

@@giin97 Ow, no. I mean, incredibly happy to live in a place with basically no guns, especially when it comes to dealing with cops and such, but if I lived in the US I'm getting myself a simple pistol for sure.

He's also got an engineering degree and a second channel where he talks about simple and complex stem subjects

@@a_d3mon i'm studying engineering as well, and yeah i have seen his other channels too :)

@@rebellioussunshine1819 Hey what do you know? I’m also studying engineering!

Keep him

As a vacuum technologist I learn more and more about less and less.

Difficult to do that if they've got two in the chest.

Radical Liberal idiots!!!!! In that case shoot ask questions later. One warning ⚠️ Leave property or else!!! Too bad innercity morons in Merica never learn. 😤 Need money 💰take out a loan, ask friend, family. Also pay back friends, family. A loan is never a gift!!! Or resettle debt through agency.

times have changed. our kids are getting worse...

This guy’s a genius

YES IT IS can't believe watching a video second time would be funnier than the first one

and like I was liking the first one a lot, it's incredible

Even in Scream it won’t work, since they have doubles/partners. Will be yet another “Clever girl” Jurassic park moment. So, yes, exactly. Most “slasher” villains cannot be stopped by bullets. Only “thriller” villains may be such

The usual solutions are to target people unlikely to have a gun (teens, very young adults, people at a college or some other place unlikely to be packing, etc), have the villain unable to be stopped by bullets, or have the gun toting guy get killed first, usually by surprise.

Movies like Scream and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre are probably the best arguments for the Second Amendment and gun ownership out there. Both villains would be dead within minutes or less, and they'd frankly look stupid instead of scary (especially Leatherface).

@@thunderbird1921 Texas Chainsaw Massacre actually took place during a time when gun ownership was more run of the mill than the politically charged stuff of today. Meanwhile, Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween and Friday the 13th pretty much continue without a single adjustment even if all of the protagonists have guns.

I think the one with the if veterans were in horror movies had that.

It’s not pro gun or anti gun. It’s just a skit.

Although Zach is fairly centrist with his skits, this is blatantly a pro-gun skit. It's something that I can see the NRA or USCCA funding and it proves the point that we've been saying that an armed population is one that's hard to victimize.

@@matthewjones39 Normy.