And after the atrocities in India, even theists will start denying God. If God exists, and this is how he wants Indians to behave, he can go f himself.
Bro chill If he is eligible even in Collegium he will surely become. You see I'm pursuing Law in Delhi, I'm first Gen Lawyer and by no way I can't compete with Second or Third gen lawyers. On the other hand These Chandrachud's are 5-6 Gen Lawyers and you think most of people can compete with them? They have had Learnt all Legal terms just by having Dinner with Family by 7-10 years 😂 U C they have huge depth knowledge of Law so Collegium selects those who are eligible for that seat
@@mohammedzakir1592 after u become a lawyer and are competent how do u feel is still someone chooses their family over you? That’s a fucked up system and must go. Else let’s bring back monarchy instead of elections
@@KRISHNAVERMA-sk9ye they flew because of attrocities in those countries in the nam eof religion. but people like AAPTARDS were very happy to keep rohingyas and bangladeshis, why question now???
@@KRISHNAVERMA-sk9yeMany people just like you sadly don't understand the CAA and vaguely argue. The law is not calling out anyone newly. Its just providing citizenship to people who have already come here before December 2014.
@@trilliondreams9048 yes bro. Modiji left aliens. I will write to him that we should also include aliens in the CAA act because they are also living. They also deserve to be Indian🙂😊.
It didn't see where it lacked the argument but the thing on caa which he pointed out lacks many points, so careful consideration should be and correct measures should be taken, so it would be on point.
The whole premise of his lecture is useless as he has neglected the very basis of this act which is the ppl affected by partition of India. He is talking about every other persecuted ppl in the world which we don't have any link with.😂
Peacefuls hate Jews more than Hindus and Christians. They killed Daniel Pearl who was an American journalist just because he was a Jew. There are no jews left in these three countries
There are Hindus in North Sri Lanka who have faced "historical persecution", why have they been excluded? Sirf muslim majority neighbouring countries ke Hindus ko bachana hae, baki Muslim minority neighbouring countries ka nehi?
There's 40 lakh advocates in India Why should only his opinion matter? Just because he's the son of CJI and grandson of former CJI?? Isn't it a feudal mindset?? Isn't it supporting uncle judges syndrome?
@@whoxxx your own old comment says that "why this women (sudha Murthy) is important to be interviewed?" So according to you sudha Murthy is not important but this moron is Doglapan ka course kiye ho kya bhai?
@@nitinchauhan1909 Sir I will watch it. I clearly mentioned in my comment, if a person can't understand what's being written then I don't know what will make them understand. As you have already stated "Why should only his opinion matter?" means you believes are aligned with the others with the similar believes. So just wanted respected you and the similar others to use social media as a platform and tagging the concerned institutions and personnel to display your thoughts publicly. Or maybe you are too afraid to do so and just having fun all by yourself hiding behind a screen and criticizing the faulty system from the safe distance. Is that so ?
The whole premise of his lecture is useless as he has neglected the very underlying basis of this act which is the ppl affected by partition of India. He is talking about every other persecuted ppl in the world which we don't have any link with.😂😂
Bro first thing first ….CAA is just providing an expedited path to avail citizenship to certain communities while others can still avail the citizenship through the previous route that is citizenship act of 1957 so don’t worry and just don’t spread or fall into propaganda
Education and logic point needed to take things on serious note..also you need to true indian and hindu to get this. U guys need magicians only 😅😅right
Why the hell on earth do we need more people from other countries when our own population in not being managed properly. And on religious grounds is a big no no as it totally violates the constitutional norms.
Hindus and other people of indic religions in our neighbouring countries were promised equal treatment and dignity. Both Pakistan and Bangladesh have failed in it. It is India's duty and dharma to save its people. They are our people. I do not want any muslim from Pakistan or Bangladesh to get Indian citizenship they made their choice to establish muslim countries by breaking ours let them stay and rot there.
Hindus and other people of indic religions in our neighbouring countries were promised equal treatment and dignity. Both Pakistan and Bangladesh have failed in it. It is India's duty and dharma to save its people. They are our people. I do not want any muslim from Pakistan or Bangladesh to get Indian citizenship they made their choice to establish muslim countries by breaking ours let them stay and rot there.
The Constitution guarantees equality to citizen not to refugee and a hindu in bangladesh and in afpak can't be equated to muslims. The Constitution also talks about equal protection of law.
The point being my friend, there was no need for this act altogether. This act is only in place to appease the vote bank. Those people would've gotten citizenship anyhow, but they brought this act, singling out a certain minority, spreading hate against them just to win votes.
Brother Pakistan Bangladesh doesn't even exist before 1947 It's our akhand bharat That why we should take care of our brother and sister who faced religious atrocity Just because of Gandhi and jinah type leader India's partition happened 98% of Muslim voted in favour of separate country and because of our beloved Gandhi ji Even after partition same number of Muslim still there is india then what's the fucking point of partition
Will we have him as supreme court judge? For he seems to be from the sickular school of thought, Not knowing the history of India, believing "India that is Bharat" came into being only after 1947. India that is Bharat is a true secular/plural society not because of its constitution but due to indigenous religions, practices and their ethos.
iska baap yahi same soch rakhta hai do you think isne asman se sikha what they discuss in family dinner he learned all from there. colegium is most deangrous for indian socity becaus is still british judiciary wiht differnet oclor running in indpedent india
@@rajachowdhary7052laws themselves all over the world are mostly a result of the British system. The very right wing extremist party you support stands for election for Parliament based on a Westminister model. Again, it has been derived from Britain. Why don't you study in Gurukuls and Madrasas? Why is it in English that you are typing ? Do type in Sanskrit. Half read people like you supporting those calling liberals "sickular" are the reason we are here today. Money stolen through Electoral bonds galore, the political scams have just been started.
@@parthivchakraborty8253plural means having different cultures not accepting the all religion into our country and the religions which were accepted mostly were home for main home land ie india and only countries were from undivided India (ie Pakistan ,afghan and Bangladesh) this law allows the immigrants that arrived before 2014 and now it is 2024 basically after 11 years Muslims can also apply for citizenship act . First read the CAA bill and then talk . Now it’s been 10 years so then Muslims can also apply for citizenship in india , it’s sad to see people like you just following the personalities and not revising the bill which makes me think how dumb and idiotic you are . Such a shame.
@@ProfB27 These nepo ppl think very high of themselves. They think only they r highly intelligent & all others are f00ls. Typical colonial mindset like British.
Koi isi Israel the citizen Act dika do bhai Aur sir oo sorry my lord Ahamadiya and Shia or even Azrael don't have any right in India waqt Don't consider them muslim but your father has Said it's there personal matter we can't interfere with them.😂
@@Cyscon According to the Jewish Law of Return, all Jews, no matter where they were born, are Israeli citizens by right. The law refers to every person born to a Jewish parent, or who is a convert to Judaism, and is not a member of another religion. Le proof bhai Aur waqt wala baat to sahi hai
If they include srilanka , they will have to include Muslims as minority in the list so they just removed it even though many migrants are there from srilanka and Myanmar
@@onlytolearn a mere google search before commenting is too much to expect from a “ sangamitra WhatsApp university “ student ?? Which special act allows citizenship to srilanakans from 1983 ?
Wait you can’t critique the government, How dare he raise genuine questions. No! HOW DARE HE QUESTIONS THE ALMIGHTY GOD THAT IS BJP. We should have BJP run the courts. Because it already runs the government, The Election Commission, The Media, The Religion and best of all, the idiots who vote for them.
*How flawed this logic is* Jews, Ahmadiyas Bahavis or whatever were not our original ancestors, they migrated to India from some where else. We gave them refuge that time because at that time they were persecuted, it doesn't means we will give our entire country to them.
Are you not a descendant of Aryans( the OG colonisers of India) who themselves came from outside and invaded India? 😅 Read Aryan Migration. Adivasis are the only native of India. Study child.
@@prismaticindia9046 So, obviously I am not an Adivasi, I don't think I am indigenous to the land, my ethnicity or culture would be Bengali, my religion is Islam, both culture and religion goes back several generations, my mother tongue is a sub dialect of bengali, called syleti. which is widely spoken in Bangladesh today. My state is Assam, dead proud of the Assamese culture as well. I speak 6 languages at best, Assamese, Bengoli, Syleti, Hindi, English and Arabic. So, what would I be? Right now, An Indian with the traces of several cultures, language and religion, example of the pride in the hearts of our freedom fighters.
Bhai toh apne Desh ke logo ka sochna chahiye na. Doosre Desh ki minorities se hame kya. Chahe Hindu ho yaa Jew yaa koi aur. Unke purvaj India nahi aaye toh hamari galti hai
@@sakshamjain9494 Kitne nirlajj aur insensitive ho. Jara libtard mindset se bahar aao. Lehru-Gandi ne hi unko roka tha India aane se. Kaha tha ki Paxtan se hum guarantee lenge ki unke saath injustice nahi hogi. Aur murkh ye refugees log pehle se hi India mein hai. Unke liye ye Act ek rahat ki baat hai. Jain ho lekin apne Tirthankaro se kuch sikha nahi aisa lagta tumne.
If they include srilanka , they will have to include Muslims as minority in the list so they just removed it even though many migrants are there from srilanka and Myanmar
The whole idea of CAA is to fasten the process of citizenship for "Historically Proven Persecutions of Religious Minorities" in pak, ban and afg. We have no data for jews , or any other group this guys talking about. As for anyone who is not included in CAA he/she can still use CitizenShip act of 1955 . This argument of "why not him or him " is just illogical theoretical bullshit created by people like him who failed to understand a simple act.
Isn't that exactly the reason Atheists/Ex-Muslims would want to seek refuge in India? Only celebrates Ex-Muslims in Podcasts, but when it comes to giving them refuge, No thanks. 🤣
What kind of lawyer is he??? Why can't people just read what CAA is? This law is for oppressed people from neighbouring countries. Everyone has right to apply for the citizenship if u go by the process, well jews, bahaiys can apply Mr.lawyer. this lawyer is just making his name. I think he needs to study law. Jews have been given citizenship. Well in congress point of view your are absolutely right, which has always left out all those oppressed people by these countries. Can he dare to ask the questions to congress?? I don't think so Coming to atheist, in the name of secularism they have been mon sense, they cannot defend out culture, they only know to say non sense. Well i think those people clapping for atheist are I'll mindset guys.
What a great thinker who doesn't know history of India. India was partitioned on basis of religion and only in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh Hindu are tortured.
@@bullwhite9695 They are nepo lawyers and judges. Product of nepotism, partiality & favouritism. He is there only bcoz he belongs to their closed friend circle, can speak fake accent English and bcoz his father is CJI. Otherwise such idi0t would hav not been even entertained by these SC lawyers and judges.
Just to make clear respectfully hazaras r shia muslim nd they belong to minority sect of muslims technically they r muslims. Hazaras r not minority muslims. 2 billion ppl firmly believes kadyanis r kafirs/non-muslim. How cud u even say to them muslim 😅😅😅. Every speaker wants to hear clapping for himself feom audiwnce.
If you are a Jew regardless of country where you live in you can move to Israel and claim citizenship. Whereas if you are a Buddhist, Bhutan will treat you as a foreigner. No citizenship on the basis of religion in Bhutan. You have to accept the fact that if persecution is on the basis of religion, citizenship will be given on the basis of religion. It's called humanity. These kind of people present half facts to gain popularity. Shame on you.
Jews are not seeking citizenship in India because of persecution from pakistan, bangladesh and afghanistan. There are no jews in these countries and no jews is coming from these countries. And the jews who already live in India are already citizens for several generations. You need to study the CAA which is specifically built for specific countries in our neighbourhood for their minorities which are persecuted. Where do other people come in these. You should also need to understand that we can't take all of their population as India is already so much populated. So we can only be selective in this case. How can you be so ignorant when you are so much educated and son of CJI.
There is a process for obtaining citizenship. CAA doesn't take away that process. CAA has been deliberately designed that way. Not only limited to certain religions, it is also restricted to certain countries only. If you open up CAA for everyone, the entire population of those countries will knock at your door tomorrow.
Our population is increasing and is highest in world. While millions of our own people live in poverty how the hell are we gonna bring in more people and sustain
You left out a simple logic ....the muslims who created Pakistan and later Bangladesh were muslims who didn't believe in the idea of India. The muslims who stayed back in India beleived in the idea of India , our Muslims worked hard to make India grow .... Now that India is successful, why the Muslims of Pakistan n Bangladesh be given easy Indian citizenship when 2 generation back they broke India .... Dont you think thats doing injustice to Indian Muslims more than anyone else...the people who stayed in India and built India be given equal footing with people who actually broke India
My dear clever human being, in 2018 there were 4 Jews in Dhaka, There were two Jewish families in Bangladesh [after independence], but both migrated to India - one in 1973 and the other in 1975, their families lived more than 11 yrs they can get citizenship, no one restricts them by law. Also there are officially no Jews remaining in Afghanistan today, all who existed earlier went off to Israel. Only one self-declared Jew, is present in Pakistan. For ur information no Jew is left and those who are there, they came to India. Many Pakistani Jews joined local Jew community and have got citizenship. All the Bene Jews, Baghdadi Jews and Cochin Jews are only in India with citizenship. We gave citizenship to those communities who are not legally provided with rights by constitution of these states. These states promote islam of any sect legally. So they have constitutional rights. The CAA is to give citizenship to those who migrated due to no constitutional background in Islamic neighbours of India. Also if we include Balochis and others, it would poke Pakistan, because there is a demand for a nation on basis of their ethnicity and if we do give them citizenship , we would be seen by international community as of we are funding to Pakistani separatists and it prevents India from questioning Khalistani separatists. Its like Myanmar saying as you gives have a tribal conflict in Manipur, Kuki tribes are given citizenship , it escalates situation of conflict between tribes and nations also... So to defend FP , we didn't include them. If relations worsen , they blame us, soo we should be careful...
First of all Buddhism originated in india no further question. And for jews i think there is not single jews immigrants from these country and atheist it can be used as a loop hole but yes we can think about jews and theist, and Muslim minorities but from my knowledge islam does not teaches about caste😂😂😂😂
I'm not against Jews being granted citizenship...but Israel is their Ancestral land...also there are no Jews in Afg,Pak or Ban. Jews if persecuted anywhere will go to Israel first.
Is it that hard for this guy to understand that this bill is for those countries that share immediate land boundary with India, what kind of a lawyer is he?
Trying to "win the argument"??...just tell us are you for or against the CAA principally?? The act is brought-in to fulfill the promise made by Indian State to the non-Muslim Indians who were left starnded in Pakistan during partition. - CAA is applicable for the people who hv already come in India from these 3 countries - which has no Jews and Bahais (so you are factually incorrect) To answer this lad: 1. Jews - although i stand with jews but they have no locus standi to be included in CAA - they can get citizenship if they seek for it. And as pointed above thrs no jew who came to India from Pakistan seeking citizenship. Such a lame argument. 2. Buddist - Thats a religion born in Bharat while thr relics have been torn down in pk. Ofcourse they should be included just like sikhs and jains. 3. Christians - well India being ruled by British, thrs a huge lot of Hindus who embraced Christianity and they are persecuted in pk all the same. But they r Indian all the way. 4. Atheists - if you understand the core of CAA - it revolves around "religious persecution" - hope you understand 5. Categories of Muslims - different sects within a religion have different "beliefs", just like shwetambar and digambars in Jainism; nirankari and amritdhari in Sikhism. But they are Jains and sikhs. You will understand, if you "try" to understand the plight of people, instead of your urge to win the argument...such a shame. 6. Bahai's - dont even want to get in others. Guy is a good "orator", wish he had a good understanding of the "matter" as well.
Is this guy related to cji somehow but he is not smart he thinks that he is funny and making a valid point but he is not and all the audience laughing are they actually real orbjust recorded voices
I have seen many jews who come to India after retirement and they always told me that they feel included, accepted and safe here that's why many jews come India from Israel after retirement to experience the culture and enjoy their life.
What about Pervez Musharraf. Poor soul persecuted in Pakistan, why he is not included. He was no country. And it's not answer to say that "retired army general of enemy state".
morons are those , who make laws without a logic or poor logic. khud apne statement ko examine kar, Tere mai ratti bhar dimag nahe hai, sabko lag gaya pata.
