When The Oscars Got It Right 

Caesar0411 both the god father games are pretty good. The first one is okay, the second one is phenomenal.

That's an offer they can't a refuse.

Followed by Scarface, hopefully.

Maybe when that sopranos movie comes out this year, or more accurately it’ll probably be an episode from the show

Yesteday I started replaying The Godfather: The Game, and today I see this, what are the odds

I'd rather say great terrible movies.

Stolen joke.

You had us in the first half I’m not gonna lie

So many people have stolen it I don’t know where it originated

@@frankmerker630 It's not necessarily a stolen joke. It's just a joke that's easy to come up with, so several people made the same joke.

The Best Animated Film category was created by Disney to fellate themselves. Spirited Away has been the only non-Disney film to win. And by that time, Disney had Studio Ghibli under it's distribution umbrella.

overlookers, Shrek won the first year the category was made.

@@overlookers Aside from Shrek, Wallace and Gromit, Happy Feet, Rango and Into The Spiderverse. Really, Pixar has been king more than Disney, at least until recently, and a whole lot of those winners really deserved it.

Agree, and sadly, those kind of movies (2D animation) probably will never won oscar again because academy will always prefer 3D animation movies

Lachlan and guess who owns Pixar

Yeah the fact that Williem Defoe wasn't even nominated is a crime

i like cheese

@@maxtoasted i like toast

C0SM1C I like turtles

C0SM1C I like beans

Maclunkey

I'm amaized they snubbed him again!

Martin Scorsese's reaction while his rap was the best thing of the night.

Bruh for a sec i thought u had the 100K subs checkmark

a statement that will some day be heard by the right people

No it needs women. Angry Red Women.

Mars wants milfs eh? ;D

I like Cheese

Don't worry .When Blue Origin finally land female astronauts there ,you can say we have Amazon women on Mars.

Helps that Chivo has taken a break after Revenant! But yeah, should've won for Jesse James.

Travis Spazz personally think he should’ve won in 2012 with Skyfall over Life of Pi, and again in 2013 with Prisoners over Gravity.

Also should’ve won in 2000 with Oh Brother Where Art Thou over Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon

Definitely should've won with either of the Assassination of Jesse James or No Country for Old Men over There Will Be Blood (which was good but basically just won for the giant oil rig). Personally I'd pick tAoJJ(btcRF)

@@cb1784 I'd pick either Sicario, NCFOM, or Skyfall, but honestly literally any of his other films would work just fine

Such a classic

The most underrated alien movie of all time

Ironically that's toned down from his actual body. Probably.

He got hoed so many times

You mean his dick?

But did it win an Oscar?

@@SJ9001 the kids that didn't wake up won 3 Oscars each, because they did wake up but acted asleep

Godfather 1&2 wernt good was said in the video above, says alot....

The movie also should’ve gotten a nomination for best director or best original screenplay.

Matt Wix Second best film of the decade.

Was Sandler honestly as good as the ones already nominated? You wanna put him over Willem Dafoe for example (Also snubbed)

@@14DANESSJ i'd nominate him or Willem Defoe over Banderas, Pryce, maybe Driver. Defoe should have 100 percent gotten a nod too. Supporting Actor would have made sense given his role in The Lighthouse being more as a foil for Pattinson's lead.

Who would you not have nominated instead of him?

Probably the best film I watched last year.

my favorite marvel movie ever

But what?

Masterpiece

Pooj's Variety Hour didn’t they win in 2016?

Podscar

I wish I could add more “likes” to your videos. 🤣 when you stated that this narrative was in the style of Pulp Fiction, rofl

That was a great year for movies 👌

I'll climb into that grave with you, I agree

Annihilation should have been shown in actual movie theaters. I’ll go to my grave damning the Hollywood producer who shunted this generations 2001: A Space Odyssey into the three theaters that do independent films then straight to Netflix

Fuck it make it a grave for 3

History will redeem it

Thank you!! Favorite of 2018!! Score, sound, adapted, cinematography etc.

I find 12 Angry Men unwatchable. The whole time I'm just muttering "...mistrial...mistrial...mistrial..."

@@jasonc3a lol true

Tu ru ru... tan tan tan tan tan tan tan tan

BBLettuce No... I searched for the end-credits too...

No because I’ve seen the film before...

And here's where John Williams ripped off the Jaws theme from: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RCct_tSQ8WY.html

The game of life it’s hard to play I’m going to lose it anyway The losing hand I’ll someday lay So this is all I have to say That suicide is painless it brings on many changes and I can take or leave it

You haven't seen pulp fiction or Forest Gump????

InCultured swine

Stop only going to the movies for superhero films.

@@goku8621 blade runner 2049 cries in the background

The only movie I’ve seen is the 2011 This is not a movie by Olallo Rubio. Sorry guys

Indeed, but at least he didn't get a nom just to lose for a 3rd year in a row

@@vb8428 I think that in the best supporting actor category he would have easily won

As was robert pattinsons

Who would you not have nominated instead of him?

Because Weinstein bribed the voters

creekandseminole Shakespeare in Love is the better movie. A thoroughly entertaining comedy. Witty, smart, beautifully shot. SPR has a great 20minute opening and then turns into an average war movie.

It would get called sexist in today's world for not including female soldiers

Blaine's Wasteland when Battlefield 1 gets called sexist for not having female soldiers in WW1, N7 might be right

It will be redeemed when they make the Dexter Jettster Stand-alone Star Wars story film

I feel like the supporting categories usually go to the right people because that category is almost always the most competitive.

It’s almost like you have to stand out as a supporting actor in a film to even get recognized to begin with

With 5 parts.

They probably didn't but yeah.....I hope so too.

@Chicken Dancer agreed! :))

I was literally about to comment this. I hope their motivations were in the right place & they didn’t just do it for forced diversity. I am all for diversity & I think that everyone deserves equal opportunity, but I personally can’t stand when people complain that no woman has been nominated for best director & think that a Woman has to be nominated every year. No they don’t, it should come down to who they think did the best job directing the film. I think it has been a problem in the industry that Women haven’t been given as much of chance as men & I’m glad to see them given more opportunities, but that doesn’t mean that a Woman should just be nominated because she is a Woman.

What about it?

@@daredevil6145 Saying that I think it should've got that award

I cant tell if this is a troll or not, because the prequels had awful special effects

@@GenGaara while I will agree on episodes 1 and 2, I find episode 3s effects to still hold up for the most part today, and look very good for the time

+MKaptain Karo The VFX in Ep. 3 weren't anything special by the time the film had come out, hence it not getting a nomination. Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones at least introduced some new VFX techniques and were very experimental in that regard, but Revenge of the Sith mostly just offered the same familiar stuff everyone was used to by 2005 and it didn't look that great compared to the competition. King Kong easily knocked it out of the park, with the exception of some really bad compositing here and there.

You can blame Harvey Weinstein for that.

Mr. Friendship “When you bring me out can you introduce me as Joker (2019)” -The Joker (2019) from Joker (2019)

@@autismobinch135 ** more joker

Agreed. Weirdly the three amigos were right behind Scorsese that year! Pan's Labyrinth, Babel, and Children of Men.

No it didn't mate. Children of men came out that year

Rocketman got a nomination

@@Enzophanis1892 oh yeah, forgot about that. but i still wanted to see it nominated for best picture or best actor for taron egerton or best costumes

Rah Sheen you make me sick

...was a TV series.

But imagine caring about the bridge over the river kwai.

lmfao YES. Jim Curry lip syncing to Welcome to the Jungle in a meat locker. Priceless.

@@jasonc3a Jim Curry and Tim Carrey?

Three bilborads is one of the best movies I ver ever seen, ridiculous it lost against that crappy mediocre film

@@isabellum4676 I totally agree. Films like Shape of Water or Green Book, which are average movies with many cliches are more likely to win the Best Picture-Oscar

Even if it didn't win, it should have gone to phantom thread

FACTS

“Popeye’s Chickin is Fuckn’ Awesome! >;•D”

He deserves it more for playing two very different roles in Jack and Jill

He needs it for Jack and Jill and pixels

My depression movie

Please don't, not even funny as a joke.

Not a snub because he was nominated. And Joaquin 100% deserved to win.

I think he already did that video

Parasite deserved it all. Truly flawless cinema.

Nah it's equity. Foreign films have less of a chance even if they're fantastic or better. Parasite deserved all that it got

@@stella-jm2fu Nope.

@@lexgil6520 I'm legit just explaining why????

@@stella-jm2fu If Jimmy can go to Joey's, Johnny's and Jerry's house, but the latter three can't go to Jimmy's house (all four having similar houses), than that's not fair for either Joey, Johnny or Jerry.

I loved Return of the King, but I thought Lost In Translation should've won best picture. I think back on that movie far more often than I do RotK.

He was mega snubbed

I think it's a great movie - with the proviso that you have to know quite a bit about old Hollywood and the Manson murders. If you don't, it's a beautifully shot, entertaining piece of nonsense. Is it fair to criticize the film for that required knowledge? F***ing oath it is. People criticize genre films all the time because they play on nostalgia/previous films/genre tropes/etc - films that do the same thing but with history aren't better, they are exactly the f***ing same. Which makes Once Upon a Time In Hollywood exactly as good as The Force Awakens (note: I loved both of these films).

Ehhhhh nah. I don’t think it’s as good as Tarantino’s other films but that’s not saying much. I thought the performances and the character work was what held that film up. Story was kind of nothing but the characters and acting and the cinematography and all those other things make it great. In my personal opinion.

Justin Murtagh I believe a film should be able to stand on its own two feet, without the need for exterior knowledge to make sense of the story. Your comparison to the Force Awakens is flawed - sure that movie relies heavily on nostalgia, but it’s story still functions on its own. Tarantino’s new film ONLY works if you have a decent amount of knowledge of 1960s Hollywood. Otherwise entire scenes and characters make no sense and are shoved into the story for no narrative reason With that said, I still don’t even think it works if you do know the people it’s about. Because it’s not actually about the Sharon Tate murders. It doesn’t explore the life and career of Sharon, what it was like to be her, or delve into the fucked up ideology of the killers. The movie (IMO) is bed described as Hollywood nostalgia porn. It’s surface level enjoyable due to the amazing actors but nothing underneath.

@@conorowens8382 So every movie set in WW2 should explain what WW2 was, which countries were involved, and why, and where those countries are.

bruh. They're obviously joking

Out of all the nominees none of them except one movie had Robert Deniro shooting Al Pacino in the face.

jbroti 004 lmaoooo