When Will The Metaverse Actually Arrive? 

@@smashedits1678 yeah im thinking within the next 20 years, but not within the next 10. I am wondering what I should invest in, so that I am ahead of the “apple moment” in this new era.

I mean it definitely possible look at spacex 10 years ago vs today. Or ev sales in 2011 vs 2021. There’s a quote here “we often overestimate what we can do in 2 years and underestimate what we could do in 10”.

Great video. I still have a hard time imaging what the metaverse looks like as it takes off. Firstly I am not sure what would be the driver - entertainment (games, video) is a clear driver, but I have a hard time seeing it scale to 'metaverae' levels any time soon. I think work/productivity would be a better driver to get things started, but it is much less mature. It must make sense for general individual work, not just collaboration or design work. Secondly I have a hard time imagining the current style of headsets truly taking over. I think the fact that you can't see your surroundings (directly) and the fact that people can't see your face are big detractors in the short to medium term.

I just played vr for fun since 2017 the meta verse seems like a way facebook are finally going to invade our lives thurther and change what the original prupose of vr

4 hours a day! what thats a lot

re: The idea of AR or "smart glasses" -- this idea made me more at peace with people pulling down statues. But I realized with AR, if all we have is statue pedestals, then with AR one could idealize any statue they want on top of that pedestal. If you identify and honor so-and-so, just AR depict whoever you want on there. It's a huge change that wrecks current "tour busses". Plus I think it's a little "inbred"-thinking to make the world look like how you want it to look - diversity is more than skin and physical things, but we need a diversity of opposing thoughts and ideas. So I'm not saying this is all a GOOD thing - but it is something AR could potentially offer. And "when pigs fly" can become a thing now.

The problem arises when those AR glasses connect to the internet and more personal data than ever can be harvested.

@@ilowqualityripeverything7886 Not just "your" personal data, but also "presence" information of the community - facial recognition on everybody you pass by. How about this: what if AR projects data automatically about everyone you're passing by? People with criminal records, high-lighted with "danger" indicators? What if the system cross-references with wealthy people, so you know high-rollers are around you (business owners, etc), or maybe doctors or educators? How about icons above people's heads indicating things they are currently interested in -- clubs, sports, hobbies. Maybe even 'relationship status', indicated by a symbol virtualized over people's head? Maybe these could be offered voluntarily, but passive ID scanning is difficult to stop. I get the counterarguments here -- "what are we really solving with all this?" i.e. can't people just talk to each the old fashion way? I suppose a kind of "split" would happen - like we have this split between urban and rural now. This next frontier might be a kind of "hyper-society" or "cyber-society" of those willing to partake in this omni-information system - for all the positives and negatives. I don't have such a strong ego that I'm worried about compromises in personal information - no, I'm not an open book, but on the other hand I don't have anything to hide (from the government). And sure, that's easy to say, until they come after you -- or worse, a mistake or a bitter person frames me for something I was never involved with. Maybe blockchains help some of that, by making it very difficult to corrupt records. // Recall that "nations" is a fairly recent concept. To make modern society, we gave up freedoms - we all have a society security number, etc. And we're tracked by cameras now anyway, in the cities, with all those cameras doing license plate and facial registration, in real time. We've long forgotten what real true freedom means, but I hope that cost has been worth it -- for some amount of peace and prosperity, that resulted in technologies and quality of life that our ancestors couldn't even imagine....

@@ilowqualityripeverything7886 More personal data than ever? Have you never heard of a phone? That thing can track everything down from your blood pressure to morning routines, moods, iris details.

That's what I've been saying!

but people like you are a tiny minority how many people went off to go live in the woods? Most people just adapt to new tech.

@@JJ_0134 all of whats happening now is bible prophecy being fulfilled

Its insane

Do it while you can, soon there will be no more forest’s.

I think a split is probably eminent between those groups to an extent. It doesn’t help when things are subjected to words like addiction or that what someone does has no purpose. In that logic I mindlessly consume books that serve no purpose. They are a tremendous waste of time as the value of those books are entertainment only. The same could be said for cloud watching…a frivolous activity indeed. I hope that people continue to understand nuance and complexity as we continue to move forward as a society. That we continue to apply compassion and empathy towards complexity and allow people to enjoy what they like how they like it with out judgement. Wether that is fishing or online chat rooms.

Speaking from exp. I started using my devices to play games a lot and i started to get fat. I then took a gym membership and go to the gym everyday for 30 mins just to stay healthy, gaming has yet to impact me negatively. its fun and i have to taken steps to avoid its health consequences. cant say much abt eyes tho. also sometimes i take a break and go out to parks and such which is very relaxing. u said that it will be depressing, its actually the opposite tho, i feel very nice taking breaks from the high fantasy crazy worlds that i immerse myself in. its a good reset before i go and start another game. i think it will be the same with the future metaverse devices. i mean people didnt use phones but do now and still meet and live life at times.

I recommend reading the book brain jack by brian falkner. I think this book really puts VR into perspective. Some people will be able to use VR in a logical and measured way while others will simply become junkies. They will lose all sense of reality and reason. Unable to unplug and lost to their VR media.

Digital Apocalypse

@@MohammadAli-00798 yeah good point, I’m moderation I think the meta verse will be an amazing thing, but lots of money will be made if it’s highly addictive like phones. So will be amazing for many but problematic for some (I think)

If this takes off the way Mark is predicting, the problems were seeing social media and constantly present technology have on psychological and cognitive development in particular is going to look healthy in comparison. Imagine growing up with every impulse ready to be fed at all times. Something we’re already starting to see with virtual schooling and smart phones, only amplified by 1000. It’s crazy, we don’t even understand how social media and connectivity is influencing development because it’s developing faster than researchers can keep up with. So the consequences on personality, social, cognitive, and developmental psychology are not even completely understood yet. But we’re already seeing increasing rates of personality and mood disorders and anecdotal evidence that suggests that what’s happening to children brain development as a result of all of this connectivity is not great.

I still don't understand people like you who look at things as black and white. How old are you 90??

Perhaps. Invest in this tech early on, wait then profit and retire early. If you can’t stop this progression - good or bad, try to profit off of it, it ain’t illegal so... 😏📈

@@katjerouac let him express his opinion, why you getting offended lul

@@katjerouac What does age have to do with it? He touched on very real concerns and explained why he is concerned. People already spend far too much time staring at a screen. It stands to reason that if you make staring at a screen exponentially more engaging that people will spend even more time doing it. That’s only the tip of the ice burg. Think about the privacy issues with such a system in place along with AI. Think of the control that these companies will have over people’s lives. Do you really want to give up even more privacy and control to the tech billionaires? Instead of just disparaging someone for their opinion and offering no counter, I suggest you lay out your opposing argument in favor of the meta verse. Convenience? Or do you like it just because it sounds “cool” and damn the consequences?

@@katjerouac Hes not wrong... if we get a too good virtual reality or better a real deep dive. Its over for humanity. Anyone with basic knowledge of human behavior, or evolutionary psicology knows that. Needless to say... i love real world exercise, phisical prowess, and hate Zuc and his push for distopian bullshit, control of info and propaganda etc. But im totally in for a descent virtual reality sword and sorcery.

Thanks!

Your comment made me realize it. So true. Subscribed!

Keep u the value brother 🤙🏻

Thank you!

@@JohnCooganPlus yeah at first 5 seconds, I thought you were another D bag RU-vidr with typical lighting and set up. But you are actually extremely talented and I learned a few things myself watching your videos. Particularly with these fast-paced motion kind of vibe/flow. It’s unique 🥰

That’s awesome, I love hearing from people who found the channel early and stuck with it. It’s been so fun growing this. Glad to have you onboard!

@@JohnCooganPlus honestly your channel is so underrated. My favorite video is the one you talked about how you raised $2M from a single tweet.

Best video I've seen?

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. /John 3:16

@@fearGod8 amen!🙏

The human brain cant cope with all the tech at once they have to give it out in stages.

@@g0dseye80 maybe thats why they are pushing it out fast, so that the masses can be confused as to what is reality and whats fantasy...its an agenda

Have a bunch more deep dives planned.

Octupii have decentralized brains in each of those 8 arms to control it. We are still human. No matter what you do in a metaverse it's just fancy computer graphics attached to the face of a walking sack of meat.

​@@GlennDavey Forget the graphics. You can be in meta with just a command line terminal interface. The graphics are just one expression of the system state and algorithms involved. In BDO, for the most part you can't trade items (there are some exceptions). What kind of society/government is that? Imagine in real life we had that restriction - like imagine a native American tribe that came up with a culture like this: you took effort X to make item Y, which is bound to you -- you are physically prohibited from transferring item Y to anyone else. So inheritence is not an option (you can't gift the item Y to a friend, even upon death). That kind of thought would never happen in the real world. It's not quite Communist thinking. Back when Cambodia was being taken over, c. 1979 - the new regime ideal was everyone had to work. It's like "if you want to eat, you have to grow the rice" - and on one level, that seems fair, makes sense. But I think one of our greatest boons was the idea of leisure and giving a certain portion of society leisure to just think great ideas and try stuff, so they're not out in the field all day growing rice. But there's a balance - it falls apart when the ones gifted the time of leisure are dumb, corrupt, and self serving (and so unfortunately, eventually there is a sort "reset" -- like the French Revolution; chaos theory is ever present, as things are naturally dispositioned to disorder and decay, we must take great effort to maintain things in an order - an effort we fail to sustain indefinately). MAYBE meta is just that next evolution of leisure, and if you're not bogged down with physical things, some wild new ideas come about (Eddison maybe wouldn't have made the lightbulb if he was busy growing rice). When we're "virtualized" down to atomic level and can walk a system from the inside out, it's a whole new perspective and insight. // A day will come when people realize they can be quadriplegics and function just fine in meta -- no need to feed those arms and legs, and 3D print some artificial lungs and a heart, our "sack of meat" gets smaller and smaller, to eventually (perhaps) "uploading" our brains. // And it's interesting to consider that now a person can be content their whole lives with like 600 sq ft housing, there is absolutely no desire or need for the classic 2000+ sq ft house... Housing market crash, indeed.

@@voidstar1337 I'm not reading all that. I closed my Facebook in 2017. There's nothing Meta has, that I'm buying.

@@GlennDavey Fair enough - I don't endorse FB or their rebranded META (my account there was hacked by one of their employees and I've never bothered to go back). So to me "meta" is just the general concept of the metaverse, which will come with or without FB's involvement.

@@voidstar1337 Human civilization is dreaming past its own end.

Gwak gwak gwak

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. /John 3:16

He's rockin it wickid haad dood

Tnx You Sir

We will end up like Matrix

@@VioFax cope harder loser

The metaverse should be open-source and free from gov and big corp ownership. Basically the metaverse should be like the internet.

@@Commievn I agree lmao

Sorta just like the internet and smartphones No one wants to feel like it takes over, but if its always subtly in the background it becomes the norm

@@thepeatboggy yeah. AR is like a smartphone but better because of portability and extra features

Correct even if facebook does have so many billions of users, less than 50% could ever hope to afford the high spec technology required for it. But on the other hand, if it's not good looking then it won't feel immerse (if you know pokemon, it's like the difference in BDSP and Pokemon legends areceus) and to make it look great the price needs to be high but if the price is high then a lotta people can't get it... IDK how this problem could be solved

high spec of today is low spec of tomorrow :)

​@@vic_710 there's a school of thought that says immersion is to capture your mind, not just your eyes. shit feels immersive when what you're doing is meaningful and engaging. hi-res eye candy will get old very fast if thats the main attraction. It's important for sure, but... a good book doesn't have any pixels, is all i'm sayin.

@@ThomasARichardson Correct but to capture a human mind in thinking that what it's seeing is real, the objects that it's seeing have to seem as normal life like as possible and that needs high res. Yes as you said, what you do in it has to be meaningful but... even if it's the best book in the world, how many %cent of humans can actually get fully immersed in it?

Snap out of it lol you'll be one the first to have your life 'zucked' out of you lmao

I would buy one in a heartbeat if if it had sound. But 2K for an HMD that doesn't even have sound? Yes, you can plug your own stuff in, but I don't like cramming things in my ears. Index's sound is amazing...sounds better than any headphones I've ever heard and it doesn't even touch your ears. I think I'll get a Reverb to satisfy my craving for higher resolution until something better comes out.

Thanks a lot! The channel has more than doubled in the last month, so it's definitely growing!

I love VR gaming there's nothing like it but my issue is I can't play it for more than a few hours a day or i get super sick. I don't know how they can fix that. I know I would never have a headset on for 8hrs to do a job if it would get me sick after the 1st hours.

I appreciate that!

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. /John 3:16

@@fearGod8 ????

this meta thing goes against principle of death..... like you have to let go of people, making a vr version of the deceased does nothing but meddle with the persons feelings towards the deceased. forget about that, even if some of us dont believe in a religion, its obvious that humans wont survive long, our existence is going to decline sooner or later, it useless to spend money on something that teleports us into a fake dimension...… metaverse is nothing but trouble

Feeding AI biographies and then making interactive avatars based on the information? If you meant that, it's already a thing.

@@theseeker3073 Behavioural and personality

​@@nishathunnisa1431 Idk how is it with you, but I'd love to interact with an avatar based on Plato, Hannibal Barca, Da Vinci, Isaac Newton, or Nikola Tesla. So many exciting minds in history. Feed the AI with every piece of information that exists about the person, then you have a synthesized historical person that you can ask anything regarding them and have entire conversations with them. The potential of this for education is just immense.

@@JewLiSmile Yeah that already exists and is trialled in education technology.

Physical ownership is an illusion anyway. A bunch of atoms doesn't belong to you if you think about it.

@@bastialonso8354 No ones denying its a social construct. He's just saying its better for now at least.

I'm already nearsighted so I probably see in 2 K. 😂

Yes but interface of SL is bit complicated for me to use, i hope in future Second Life Developers will make one shop and one interface more simple like wear clothes, or make clothes/accessories fit the body, i like alot SL but interface it has to become more intuitive for everyone.

@@Katy950 that's not gonna happen. you couldnt simplify the UI, without simplifying the platform itself. and SL is inherently very complex and nerdy, and gives the user almost limitless control. but i have to agree, that it's an absolute handfull, with the complexity of a foreign operating system, and a steep learning curve, making it .. not the most acessible to newcomers. in 2011, linden labs did try to streamline most of the UI into a sidebar with the SL viewer 2, sacrificing a lot of the multitasking and customizability options of the client. it was pretty much universally hated, because it felt needlessly limiting, dumbed down and partonizing to existing users. but you may wanna give some 3rd party viewers a try sometimes. PS: there is the second life market place, at least. initially the whole ting with clothing was much easier, but with mesh avatars and clothing, it's a royal pain in the ass, i'm doing my best to avoid. SL is very open, and content is exclusively created by users, with no enforced standards. so often the parts of one avatar maker will not be compartible with another one's.

Hopefully soon! The growth has been crazy recently.

@@JohnCooganPlus , keep up the good work , mate! God bless and stay safe!

I remember watching his vids just a few months ago when there were only a few hundred views , wondering why he wasn’t huge… but pretty sure with this level of quality he will continue to crush it

we did it! 100k today

@@JohnCooganPlus congrats, man! Next up, 500k or 1mil! It’s possible!

Why do games need to be in a blockchain That justt seems useless

blockchain games?

What practical purpose do blockchain games even hold Its pretty shit if you literally can't edit your own game isnt it?

Just tryna get those crypto stonks I see

Definitely working on more Metaverse related content. There are lots of ways to get involved. You can learn programming, game development, 3D art. You could work at any of the dozens of companies that have metaverse initiatives. You could also go deep in crypto, since there are tons of Metaverse / Web3 projects there. DM me on Twitter if you want to chat more!

I would start by buying a Quest 2 or another VR headset if you don't have one already.

Well im telling you now ,, be ready for that ride in about 5 years , not 20.. it’s here

Absolutely

No one will like metaverse, it's just a buzzword which serves no purpose. Ask actual Software Engineers, they will laugh at your metaverse idea

@@iGhostr ummm 🤔 the software engineers are the ones who is creating the metaverse… this is a real thing ,,, so much, that you’re watching this video….

@@iGhostr Major companies like Intel, Nvidia, Meta, Microsoft, Epic and others are investigating billions of dollars right now to develop it. Are you saying that these companies are not smart enough to know where to invest their hard owned dollars?

Yeah that's a good point. I'm kinda worried about the physical and mental health implications the Metaverse could have. Eyes are adjusted to constantly be focusing on objects of different distances rather than one fixed distance which is the case with phones and headsets. There is also the implication of declining fitness and health with video games replacing sports as popular competitive entertainment as he said. Mental health wise I think going from a complex virtual reality back to the real work could be incredibly depressing. Who knows the implications! But I doubt the correct infrastructure to deal with these implications will be set up just as it isn't with social media. And I think it will be almost impossible to control how people interact with the Metaverse meaning that a dark web will also form here but be way more realistic. Thoughts?

@@tompenny5684 not sure if you know now but vrwave let's you order lenses for your headset. Not that expensive and no need to wear glasses. Cheers

John Carmack is a fucking god. A boundless entity that holds together all of space and time. He only manifested a projection of his being to this Earth so that we'd have DOOM.

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. /John 3:16

Why?

Why?

I remember you commenting! Thanks for backing the channel so early! You're a big part of why the channel is growing now!

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. /John 3:16

Trading crypto now would be wise, but trading without a professional is really bad, I tried to trade alone, I completely lost a lot of money till I started trading with expert Anthony Jeff that is a nice broker

I have heard a lot about investments with Anthony Jeff and how good he is, please how safe are the profits?

@@allicebailey2656 Woooo that man his good work has been everywhere. Been seeing a lot of good comments about him on several places. I feel more confident investing with him, I've been on the train for over two weeks now... best Broker for life

I have been able to arrange funds to invest I will kick off anytime soon, I have $3452 already. he's plug to success 😎

I got Anthony's Info, how good is he ?

Isn't it already? Or atleast for some people

I see what you are saying. I agree. Don’t you think there will be a need for people in the future that aren’t connected to the Meta to keep things functioning in the real world. I’m curious what you think about that.

Can't wait to eat virtual food and pretend not to starve to death. Also take a virtual dump on a toilet. Will be amazing. Fingers crossed fact checkers check everyone in real time and censor them for having an opinion.

​@@Sirdon77 Absolutely, in the near term. I live out in the country, off-grid - solar arrays and well-pumps for water. But as that equipment fails, yep, I still depend on manufacturers to make them (balanced with my own contribution to afford whatever the repair cost might be). And that's a concern I have about "city folk" who may take for granted on just how things work - like in the movie Fight Club or even Fifth Element, there is some dialog related to idea that it's a lot of people running around that ultimately makes things work -- from water treatment, power plants, road maintenance, etc. -- like the ending credits of a movie, all those hundreds of people involved that you never saw. I've had co-workers scoff at the idea of having kids - like it's "inconvenient." But when I look at a worker - like a delivery person or mechanic - I think "that's somebody's kid" and appreciate all the time invested in creating that talent. So, if people get too overly selfish and stop having kids, then r.i.p. a lot of services we all take for granted. BUT, here's the thing..... The only thing stopping us from invitro birth farms is our ideals of social norms (the old sci-fi Space Above and Beyond had some dialog related to this), plus our great ideal of equality -- which is certainly a noble ideal, but at the end of the day there are classes: you have some people who aren't quite college material or just are content at a daily grind job, versus bully-like people who are hard driven AND have great ideas (put another way: not everyone is an Elon Musk and holds meetings at 3am and works till 2am the next day, it's some people being "better" but certainly some people are more "driven"). Also, long term, we may replicate our entire intellect into meta or AI -- sure, that may be a couple hundreds years away. But that's sort of key to space travel - we can't travel as bags of water, but we could travel as a small SD chip. Right now, it's a fad to emulate things like eating, drinking, waste, stamina - as we try to replicate the physical universe as we know it. We'll get over that fad eventually, and when someone can make an NPC that's so advanced you can't tell it's not a traditional human intellect (i.e. maybe "uploading our brains") then we're on that path to being done with the physical world as we know it, and our traditional physical limitations (both the pain of that, but also the joy of that). No it's not a change that happens overnight, but it is a path we're going down with this meta-stuff. // Put another way: there are people in Japan who go months if not years without ever seeing another person physically. Absolutely that lifestyle only exist due to the generosity of thousands of people they don't see - to keep power running, deliver food, etc. One of our greatest inventions maybe 120 years ago was the high-rise and elevators -- people got off ground level, and could spend more leisure time just THINKING and doing stuff in their own space. Yes, we still have a dependency and relationship with the physical world - but this meta is like the new frontier, a new wild-wild west, and there will be a growing divide between the "old" and "new" world. Physical bodies get smaller, maybe you don't actually need legs and arms to function in meta -- yep, absolutely that sounds "weird" to most of us right now. But if our physical presence is wrecking the environment, or our physical existence is destroyed by biological warefare, well - we can migrate into a virtual resilient network (yea, someone could pull the power plug - but it really is a resilient network with data-centers now in orbit).

​@@v8matey The "real time" fact checking and censor ship is concerning to me. As a related idea, YT automatically scans for copyright violations. Separate to whether you agree or disagree this is a Good Thing or Not - the point is: it's automatically enforcement of policy. There is no moderation or human element involved. A judge can have leeway in sentencing, to some extent. In our town, they tried those red-light detectors and automatic tickets - it sent so many tickets, people weren't paying it, and it just made a mess for everyone, so they've removed it (since trying to make money off it couldn't exceed the cost of the system, something like that). My point, people talk about judges being corrupt and such - but that was part of the humanity. Say you stole a car -- that's bad. But a judge (and jury) could look at the circumstances, and maybe say "well, ok, someone stole your baby carriage with your baby in it, and you were compelled to borrow a car to go after that..." and decide community service instead of jail time (it's just a hypothetical extreme for the point). But when you have a robot servicing justice -- no human element, no compassion or understanding the context. "you played 2 minutes of Lady Gaga, your video is banned." Or maybe you played 2 minutes of some audio from some international band, that you don't even know if they exist anymore. The old system was never perfect, but it allowed for some "forgiveness" that meant diversification - people could mix and experiment with stuff. I don't want every YTer spending time trying to come up with original background music - that's not efficient. On the other hand, no, not every artist should get a mansion and million dollars for their 3 minute music creation. To phrase this another way: in the old days, it was 1:1 where an enforcer found a violation, and sentencing happened. Now it's imbalanced, we have automated enforces constantly scanning (and consuming associated resources with that scanning) for violations -- there is no leeway, there is no "grease" to let the "small violations" alone. This relates to the overall idea of lack of modern moderation in any digital content - we can't pay a moderator enough, and in any case, they can't moderate fast enough when EVERYONE has a voice. // So there are two points here, (1) the issue of copyright and its duration, and applying that on a global scale -- I'm in my own little local market, trying to make a spoof video for no-profit, but I'm banned because a portion sounds similar to this Mongolian band, etc. (2) the robotic and automated enforcement of policy. As a small example, back in the 1980s when my older sister worked at the skating ring -- she could let me in for free. Just a perk of the job. Now-a-days when everything is fully automated and systematic, there is no leeway, and these implicit "perks" that made really boring jobs bearable are all gone. That's the cost of automated enforcement of policy. Another small example is at drive-thru - you've got the person taking orders and handling your money, then they ask you to move forward so they handle the next customer more quickly. My old pastor met his wife by taking time to chit-chat at a drive-thru. Good lord managers, give these people some relief, let them slack a little.

I'll try to simplify the thought here: to "escape" in the past, Europeans went to the Americas and Australia. That option (on land) no longer exists, and ocean and space is very difficult for us. So, the next "frontier" could very well be virtual reality/cyberspace - where conceptually physical political entities may not have any jurisdiction (particularly if they can't associate a virtual identity with any physical one). Europeans "escaped" Europe and religious persecution. Perhaps meta is a potential way to escape modern social persecution - to either create your own verse, or to create island-verses of like-minded entities. And with enough entities involved, at what point does it become its own "nation" of sorts with its own sub-culture?

The question is *should* he do it

Thanks!

You mean chapter markers? For the different topics?

@@JohnCooganPlus yeah those would be very helpful

@@luigicolella9105 Cool, good to know.

I think augmented reality is the big future item. Imagine walking around a store or car dealership and getting real time info pop up in your vision. Grocery shopping? Real time nutrition pop ups that can fit into your diet plan or meal prep. Digital items on shelves so stores don't even need to be stocked...

That sounds like a large extreme

@@Forcoy many things that people were saying 10 years ago also sounded like a large extreme. And here we are today, where it all became a reality we live in.

@@jaujud remember 70 years ago when people said trains would kill you cause they were too fast? Did that ever happen? Or even further back when people said books would make people stop doing work? Also don't give the 2000s credit. They already thought this kind of technology would exist by 2010. There's an amazing video about this by knowledgehub under a series with a title along the words of "2000s predictions of the 2020" or smth like that.

@@Forcoy just because something became mainstream does not mean it does not bring new problems with it

@@jaujud I know? But they're not as extreme as you think Example: No. Not much that already exists willl be restricted to the metaverse. Because A LOT of people are very paranoid of the idea of the metaverse the companies already running services in real life would lose a lot of money from people who don't use the metaverse.

Hi, Do you need a virtual assistant?

@@mariakhan4502 what type of skills do you have? I dont want to get khanned 😂😂😂😂

Just wondering, bro-ski, how much moo-la you make a year? You some rich Saudi prince? 🤭

@@henryjohnson-ville3834 im a indices trader

@@modmaliCrtzGang You need a online helper of some sort? 🤭 My job can burn down to the ground for all I care.

Thank you, always my goal to deliver value in these!

@@JohnCooganPlus and I am grateful to have found you as an content creator. 🙌🏼

That's a good perspective. I think there are definitely risks to moving in this direction, but overall it can be positive if we work hard enough.

But honestly it feels like we're just being caged, we can't be human anymore we must be controlled by big corp.

right? I mean seriously from what i saw from the metaverse presentation there is nothing even close to games i can play now.

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. /John 3:16

😑

I agree with you

@@elvisstyler1689 Both are good to go into, but if profit must be considered then cryptocurrency is far better

I want to wake up one morning and find out my portfolio is $500,000,I know it possible

@@stevenwilliams7037 This is really depending on your investment curve,just invest wisely

@@carollhumenik3287 Plan your investment with good portfolio manager and I can assure you that in few months your account will be more than your dream

That's interesting... I didn't know that! I'll have to do more research to find the full original context. Thanks for pointing this out, I really try and get all these details right.

Yes, the iPhone was the main release of the night. Steve really knew how to create simple amazing products, but never had a single effort for social interactions, so for this part Mark needs to aim for himself tho. Lol

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. /John 3:16