This guy is not a pro. He's ranks 1145.? Are you kidding me? 😂 He was going easy on this kid to make a fight more interesting. It's like watching a 10 year old black belt going against a fully grown 250 pound man. It's ridiculous.
100%. She gave a great performance and was not disgraced in anyway. Every point mattered, every point counted and her skill is undeniable. One to watch in the coming years no doubt.
I really enjoyed the fact that she doesn't grunt/scream like too many female players of the past. The detractors of the practice were always correct - loud grunting/screaming was just a way to hide the sound of the racket striking the ball to disguise the strength of the shot and gain an advantage.
@@quietackshon I'm not sure the age is irrelevant, either because younger means better body condition usually, or because it could mean she has less experience.
@@Braselton21based on this match you’d expect Serena would beat this guy and he’s ranked a bit outside 1000. I don’t know why you’d think she’d be 1000
Nah I don’t really think it’s an argument between pro male and female players. However fans always make it a heated political discussion. Serena said several times she would lose badly against male pro players so….
Unfortunately, it is political. Think about these trans athletes wreck havoc in woman sports. Individuals with low male ranking and low testosterone steamroll their competitors. Here we have a male with decent ranking and with normal testosterone level, it's hard to imagine a different outcome.
@@chubun6631 we don’t have a trans person in tennis. I don’t know if its allowed but it wouldn’t be fair at all. The pro male tennis players are athletically superior to the woman so it makes no sense for them to compete. On the other hand the wta players still train probably as hard so it’s not like i am belittling them or anything. They have a good product for a female sport. The wta is the most popular female sport out there and produced many stars like Graf, Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Osaka who earn more money than a lot of male players.
It's a lose-lose situation for the guy. He wins: "Ohh you won against a girl, you think you're a tough guy?" He loses: "Daaamn you lost against a girl, that's so embarrassing."
And notice, he relaxed early because he broke her first serve and then she fought and made the first set extend. But the first volley this showed, she got him in the perfect place, her hitting forehand and him in his backhand...and it still didn't matter. He relaxed again in the second set and she broke his serve again. But, this is pro level vs club level. I didn't even know they ranked players passed 500.
you're absolutely right, he should have just let the girl win.Who needs all that bothersome stuff about pushing boundaries and spurring each other on? And who gives a hoot about the excitement of competition or the sheer delight of overcoming challenges?
I think more highly of both players after this match. No drama, no posturing, no complaints, just good competition for the fans when they didn't have to do it at all. Go get some titles, Andreeva!
@@kevinerose Yeah, that's the thing : anyone within a sport, is generally happy to play everyone, and respectful, so they already know, everyone knows. The reality check, when needed, generally happens off-camera, during training. Serena Williams knew, and also knows that Murray was joking, Ronda Rousey knows that she can't really fight men… there was just that female fighter who, because she was going all out during sparring, thought that the men she sparred with were also going all out… until one actually did and knocked her down.
@@kevinerose It's mostly social constructivists that pretend there is no difference between men and women. That all dispariaties are caused because men are oppressing women. Then trying to correct those disparities with discrimination. Like women getting the same pay while playing less games or in a different league. Because girls.
Man that crowd was really pulling for her. Quite a difference in the volume of applause when she scored a point compared to the polite golf claps when he did. 😂😂😂
To be fair, the applause felt more like encouragement for her to keep fighting. I think the crowd liked him too but he wasn't the one showing signs of exhaustion. She really could use the boost from the crowd a bit more than him. The crowd still clapped pretty loudly for him when he made really great shots. But near the end his shots seemed to get a lot easier as she got more and more tired.
I thought this was a pretty fun game to watch. A nice blend of technique and tactics, versus speed and power. It created a very dynamic game where it was very clear as to how their individual approach to the match played out set by set. It was also interesting watching them both size each other up through the first 4 sets and adjust their play style accordingly. Such as when she tried to match him on power the first set, but by the 3rd, she was starting to get gassed, and he was just getting warm and hitting his stride. So she started to play more tactical cross court off speed shots, and tried to force him to move vertically on the court more. In return he started playing the edges more, and started to rely more on cross court backhands, to up the tempo. Which she also adjusted on her baseline distance to try and cover off his backhands, and again changed up her shots trying to draw him to the net. Great stuff! It is that kind of real time tactical interplay set by set that i dont think you really get to see develop in tight ranked match ups, where the play styles are so close to each other, that unless you are a seasoned tennis fan, its hard to spot thr difference. This really broke it down to the base elements, if you will. I found this match extremely entertaining, and its the kind of thing i wish was a possible to have happen more often, but given the unfortunate politics that would undoubtedly get in the way, its highly unlikely. Kind of a shame.
Very suprising outcome. I definitely expected something close to 6-1 6-1, you could clearly see she trained a lot more than he does. Her placement and technique was better, but it couldnt beat the differences between power and stamina that were in his favour. well done both for playing this match.
He was a bit tight in the first set. if they were to play with no crowd then it will be 6-1 6-1. but credit to her for playing this match. I hope she win a big title next year.
Quite a good match. He committed a number of unforced errors early on, but she committed very few throughout the match. That helped keep things pretty even until Set 2, when she was clearly tiring and he was still relatively fresh. She tried a lot of drops shots, which no doubt she was used to seeing work, but he was faster than her female opponents and ran most of them down. All in all a good match, but let's remember their respective rankings.
Those drop shots were out of desperation. I doubt she tries than in a more even match-up. She dictated every point in the first set, she actually could have won it. That much effort is absolutely exhausting. Even in the second set you could tell she was more talented, but there was just no way to keep up body to body. Hence the drop shots. You can tell she didn't even have the strength to hot those drop shots, they were terribly executed and were only tried because she didn't see any other way to reasonably continue the point. I honestly think that if she was a 20 year old or 22 year old that she would have won the match (if he was exactly who he is right now)
@@KoiKoy56 She'd be around Serena's skill level and capability at that age and McEnroe says it would take a rank 700 male to beat Serena, so that checks out.
Yeah, the respective rankings is the whole point. Trying to line up where the women's league would end up playing in the men's league is the question. Some ignoramuses think #1 women would be in striking distance of #1 men. That's clearly not the case.
She played incredibly well. It looked like she was just getting tired toward the end, though. She wasn't getting returns that she might have earlier in the match. The guy was serving absolute bullets, but she returned them beautifully. Fun match to watch. Made me want to pull out my rackets and go play again (for the first time in like 15 years).
That was awesome and interesting on so many levels. Could see the cobwebs come off on the one side, and a very pro attitude devoid of ego on the other. Kudos to them both! Finally a tennis match I could listen to without turning the audio all the way down as well, a very welcome change.
If you check the guy's bio, he played some local M15 matches in his home country France where he managed to salvage some ATP points. His total price money is less than $2500. With some random points like that you enter the official ATP ranking. In other countries, there are also probably hundreds of players like him without an official ATP ranking. In the beginning he seemed to be nervous and having to get used to the big crowd and the different play style, but after that he realized there was no chance of losing and he loosened up a bit. Guy probably hangs around a year or maybe a couple of years at the bottom of the ATP lists before realizing making a living is very harsh at that level and drops off. Andreeva on the other hand has a really bright future ahead of her! She will storm the top of the WTA ranking.
Get a good draw through qualifying and there you are. I've spent a fair bit of time watching those level tournaments when they come through town. The main draw standard is amazing. Quallies have a bunch of people burning through money (usually their parents. Interesting chats with them on the sidelines) that are a bazillion levels below the standard required. then theres all the local guys who get into quallies as anyone can get in if there is a spot in the draw. Quallies also has some really really really high level players.... Very much luck of the draw. One of the local guys in his 40s was smoking these kids into the main draw until he realised he was going to be the oldest person person on the ATP rankings and choked it up. Being a thousand year old grinder, in the heat , against 20 year olds didn't help either. He was clearly a level above these ' professionals' as a guy who played a few hours a week. ( He was a very high level junior player. Who has 10s of thousands of hours in but chose a finance degree over tennis and now has enough money and time to mess about at tournaments when they come through town. I have enough to come down and watch... ) You can also get some dude coming back from injury that was ranked inside the top 200 in the first round of quallies and get completely and utterly humiliated.
As a person who has played entry level atp tournaments this is 100% accurate, which means there is 1000s of guys that could beat him with no rank, it’s crazy, the depth of the sport in Europe especially.
To be fair to the guy the pressure would have been pretty bad, lose he's a joke, win and still people would knock him. To anyone just casually following tennis the young woman is an elite junior champ almost certainly a future top tenner and probably a Slam Champ in the not too distant future, the man probably won't hit those heights yet I'd still call him a terrific player thats how tough and deep the talent is on the mens tour.
Both of them were very one dimensional. You'll never hear from him again. Her, maybe. The WTA tour is so god awful these days that she definitely has a shot at making a dent in the tour.
@@alani3992 The fact that "anybody can win things now" is the opposite of what you describe. Previously, there was a level where you had a few players at the top, and a big gap to the chasers. Now, there is a smaller gap to the following players, because the level as a whole has risen so much. Go back to the days of the Williams' sisters. They were power players, who blasted everyone off court. The both had huge serves, serving around 125 - 130 mph, and the chasing players served nowhere near that. Today, you have less of a gap between the top servers, and the chasing players, just as an example. Also, ground strokes; players today hit the ball, on average, closer in speed and spin. They have better coaching, with the advent of facilities that focus on movement and recovery, ice baths, etc. There is a level of professionalism that has been increasing year after year. Your comments are a joke, because you have no clue what you're talking about.
Her backhand is amazing. Even though she's a top 50 player and he's very low ranked I thought she would get crushed. But she surprised me by taking advantage of the guys's initial power when hitting the ball back. Anyone who played tennis with some technique knows that one can adjust to a more powerful player just by hittibg back as long as he keeps the ball on court instead of hitting winner shots. In any case good for both of them. Great match
I played tennis at a high level, I also coach tennis. One thing seldom mentioned when talking about men vs women in tennis is the fact their styles are completely different. The men's game is built on top spin and ball placement, the women's game is flat, hyper aggressive and they're trying to overpower each other. It's much easier to use the pace someone else gives you and to add height, depth and top spin to their shot. Women's balls also pass much lower over the net. When you add the fact that men are already stronger than women and can generate the same power much easier, receiving a flat, lower passing shorter ball that is slower than what they're used to when playing against other men allows them to dominate women with angles and depth as they can hit the ball perfectly at that sweet spot at hip level. Players like Rafa and Nole keep you behind the baseline or their top spin makes you hit the ball at shoulder level or even higher, which is much harder to do. Also men tend to play with more variety, so more slices to slow down the pace of the game, more approach shots using the slice, drop shots, high kick serves, serve and volley and etc.
Unfortuantely, this is the 'modern' womens game - introduced largely by the Maria "Mindless Basher" Sharapova and taken to its extreme by Williams. Consider how Justine Henin used to play - that was a "thinking woman's" tennis.
Imagine playing this match vs a clay court specialist on clay. It will definitely be 6-0 ,6-0. She won a few games on her serve because it was a fast indoor court
Thing is, there's technique to it. Mens sports are all techniques. They work to get the techniques better, which inturn makes the game evolve. Women sports I feel is just them wanting a piece of the pie. I'm not hating, but men and women sports will never be equal. I just hope sports never sees a day where there are men and women in the same team, it only works on video games.
That was to fun match to watch! I commend both these players, as each played hard, and didn't make it a gimmick. Respectful and both sportsmen about it. No matter the outcome both these players gained me as a fan. Even the crowd showed respect for the players. Unheard of these days.
Guy plays good... Just took him a while to get used to the flat shots instead of heavy topspin. Almost all his errors in the first set were into the net because of it.
@@paulb3243 This isn't why women don't play 5. In fact I remember when the women used to play best of 5 at the year end championships up until about 1998. The women agreed to play best of 5 at gland slams years ago, in the early 90's when the equal pay disputes were highly discusses but this was them blocked by tv execs due to messing with their scheduling. I also believe Serna was quoted as saying that even in her tenure on the players council women again said they were willing to go best of five, again they were not taken up on the offer.
No, the guy played bad. In the first set, he didn´t really know, what to do. For an ATP1100 he really looked stupid. Normally, he should be able to shot/blast her easily away. But he has no real weapons, guess, he will never do much better than ATP 700-900. I have friends, which are ranked higher and lower than him, but both would easy destroy her. I know a couple, where he is around ATP 1500 and she is WTA around 100, she gets a 6:0/6:0 by him on clay. They play in different speed dimensions.
Good on *both* players for playing that game. So much pressure on both of them in many ways, and it was extremely competitive in the first set. The result was the one that (almost) all of us would have expected, but I enjoyed watching it, and I commend Andreeva on having the guts to take part in such a contest!
It's a teenage girl, and not only that, a very talented one, a future star. Against a nobody, is only logical the crowd would lean to the tennis prodigy Mirra Andreeva.
Congratulations and a big thank you to both players for being willing to play publicly under such circumstances. This must have been very difficult for both of them: for him, because he is a guy; for her, because she is much higher ranked on the WTA tour. The match was actually very enjoyable to watch with her being a more balanced and complete player in terms of ball placement and point construction, and him being a harder hitter. Well done. Much respect to both players regardless of who wan. She's someone I was look for on the WTA tour.
" for her, because she is much higher ranked on the WTA tour." he would be highly ranked too if he decided to 'identify as a woman', probably higher than her
What's wrong with his ball placement? Not only is he a harder hitter, but his placement is superior, as well. The fact is she's way out of her league and is inferior overall to him. BTW, he obviously took it easy on her the first set, allowing her to seem competitive....lol!
Two warriors entered the square and honored each other by playing each other the respectfully and at 100% effort. This is what sports is about. No politics, no agendas... just merit! I think she is a very great athlete as she had more to lose since her ranking is so much higher in women. She could have said NO and not give fuel to a debate thats so talked about nowadays. They shaked hands and called it a day, move on to the next match. Wish we could see this level of sportmanship more often at the highest level.
She proved that the level of the WTA is a joke compared to the ATP. That does not mean the WTA is illegitimate, it just means we have to face reality as well as come back to the question of equal pay on the two circuits.
i respect your point, i even want to support it. but i think the man had more to lose... way more! he is a professional man and could have lost against a 16 year old girl in his sport. a sport that benefits from strength and experience. naaah he cant lose that or he will be laughed at for the next 50 years.
Regardless of the whole gender thing, it's always fun to see people around the same level who have major differences battle. It's like watching a 125lb black belt fight a 260lb white belt.
@@omerfidan892 Yeah, I had a feeling that endurance would be a key factor. The man generated pace with less effort. The WTA player was keeping up with it, but it was tiring her out.
@@Marc-vk7rl True. Federer, righty, one handed backhand, attacker, pure finesse and skill. Rafa, lefty, two handed backhand, defender, lightning speed, athleticism. One of the most entertaining matchups of all time for sure.
I commend them both. They each could’ve refused and would’ve been well within their rights to do so. I don’t think anyone could’ve faulted them for that had they done so. But they certainly didn’t disappoint and gave not only the audience, but the world an amazing match you don’t always get to see. Bravo!
@@elhananhardaway8728 Since you don’t understand, you act like you know better? Like you’re ridiculing the thought because, …..well, you don’t say why. LMAO
@@elhananhardaway8728 Really? She has NOTHING to lose here, but he have everything to lose there. If he win, okay, it was Vs a woman. We see the scores because we are interesseted and follow tennis, but if he lose, every News will show the score all day long....
@@orwellknew9112 extraordinary claim require extraordinary proof: the claim was "and would’ve been well within their rights to do so" beyond the obvious that true, free individuals are not obligated to participate in sports. The one political motivation for her not to want to participate would be that it was going to provided clear data confirming the obvious to everyone but some nuts meetoo feminist. But for all we know she is not dumb and just wanted the experience, and possibly the money, and was not trying to make a feminist statement. He had nothing to loose. he will get a stipend, and if he loose.. well he is ranked 1175, she is ranked 54....
@@XxKidnoffxX "but if he lose, every News will show the score all day long...." and show that she beat a 1000+ ranked man... it is like an Autralian National Women soccer team, ranked 5 in the world, beating a U15 Boy team.. oh wait they lost that game 7-0. There is no doubt that there exist plenty of men tennis player out there that she can beat.. it is just that at her very best, being world #1, she could not win a men decent national level tournament.
@@stevemahoney1733 It means certain days she plays better than what her ranking tells us. She is 16 and ranked 57, she's gonna be top 20 even top 10 next season
@@stevemahoney1733 she's still 16 and hasn't really played on the wta tour since april, now she pretty much has direct entry in every tournament in 2024 and is only going to get better
@@_youssef1989You're most likely right however, we don't give excuses to professionals based on age when she's in a win / win & he's in a lose / lose situation.By then giving her another out we're stacking the deck in her favour....something we wouldn't do for him, correct?
I had a female friend of mine that was a CIF champ in high school and was teaching tennis professionally. I told her I was rusty but used to play a lot of tennis when I was younger and that we should play. She laughed at me and said she would whoop my ass. I was 42 and she was 30. I beat her 6-1, 6-0. My power was too much for her so she would stand far back and then I would drop shot her. She had no chance. Also, she'd never returned such a hard serve. I also dated a professional tennis player and got to play against her and her pro doubles partner. They paired me up with a 50+ year old woman(I was 28) that had only been playing tennis for only 2 years. But she was the former number 1 women's racketball player in the world(so she learned quickly). We battled back and forth for 1 grueling set and beat them in a tie breaker. They were so pissed they wouldn't shake hands and stormed off. I wish I was dating the 50 year old... she was hot and bad ass!
Really loved this. Kudos to the guy for accepting to play her, I think he wanted to know her game before striking appropriately & that's why the first set(edited) was more fun. She'll beat most of the top 10 players in the WTA in a matter of time. She's a threat to the top 10 WTA stars. I love her style of play, calm, confident( good body posture too) & she didn't take it personal like the delusional Claressa shields gal who got KOd by an unknown male boxer from Russia & thinks she can outbox a male welterweight champion.
She handled the harder pace for the most part early in the first set but she was worn out in the second set. This could have been from hitting “heavier balls” as talked about by pro women when commentating in the booth when preparing for a mixed doubles match. Or, she might have tired out because she is only 16. She may have faded against a top 10 female player in the same way. Younger pro male players often struggle in tough 5-set matches and they may find this becomes a strength after a few years on the tour. I really enjoyed the earlier part of this as they seemed very well matched. Also, whoever coached the female player through that backhand did a great job! She gets every ounce of body weight and strength into a consistent hard-struck ball. Great form in a 2-handler like hers is grace in motion. Thanks for posting this!
"She handled the harder pace for the most part early in the first set but she was worn out in the second set." Yeah, that's how I saw it, also. She seemed to be worn out in the second set, and appeared to try to slow the pace by hitting higher and slower return shots. She also began to hit more unforced errors in the second set, likely from fatigue. Meanwhile, he seemed to cruise through the first two games of the first set, and then he unleashed his normal pace in the third game.
For sure For this man, was the biggest crowd he ever met in tenis court. Matched with 57s of man rank should end 6:0, 6:0 For male. About Age in wiman tenis is not so clear - the Best Age as in man tenis. Inteligence and muscles For man are Best around 25-35. It seems.
Well, it isn't really the pace that a man would use to put anyone, especially women, under pressure in a point. The spin is what would really help... So in reality, if he hits flat balls she can compete. If he uses a lot of heavy topspin she'll get blown off the court, she won't have the upper-body strength or stamina to keep up and respond in kind.
She faded because because he is a man and hits heavy. He is barely ranked and as many have noted could be ranked due to luck and some local showings in France. His career barely has any record on the ATP tour. And still if anything it seemed he was nervous and took it a bit easy especially in the beginning. She would do a lot worse in a 5 set match. Whether you get an older woman wouldn't make much of a difference. Well matched here says a lot. He's a bottom of the barrel player barely somewhere in the 1000s and she's on a trajectory for top 50. And he still beat her fairly casually.
She played very well. Regardless of rank or male/female Ghazouani is exactly the type of player she needs to practice against to get to the next level against her normal competition. Good for both of them putting on a good exhibition🙏🏽
a 16 year old who's already in the top 50 in the world is on track to be a top 5 player. I have a feeling she will become very well known by the time she hits her 20's! She played well.
It is quite clear that she was more or less even in the first set, but collapsed physically in the second......like Serena said, there is no way a top WTA player can make it with anyone in the ATP tour...
Funny how no one has been talking about this encounter, glad i got to see this, thanks for uploading it, you can clearly see that her talent shone through in the first set only proves that without the power of the male body made up for his lack of talent in the end, and in the second set because of her outstanding attempt and effort in the first she was almost exhausted in comparison to her male counterpart, as he usually has to play a best of five against most likely stronger male players than him so yeah good on her she will definitely have benefits from this experience dare i say she might break the top ten before she is 20 and only get better, anyways great match.
@@ajkorras Not really its pretty slow. When I saw Serena return a proper male serve she didnt even know where to move. So after few serves she decided to guess where the serve gonna go. Women just doesnt have the fast reflexes for 230km/s serves.
@@ajkorrasWell you can doubt that but its just facts. Many studies were made on this topic. Men have better reflexes and hand eye coordination in all age groups, thats why not even in esports women can compete with men.
But who is Yanis Ghazouani? He's not even in top 1000 in an individual sport discipline, which in turn means he either does a day job or relies on his family/government to sustain living. Which in turn means he falls outside of definition of "pro" -- the person who does it for the living. In the other hand, even though pro sports between sexes are nowhere equal, this 16-years-old girl will still beat you and anyone you know personally despite sex and age disadvantage. You have to appreciate how much work she put in to get where she is now.
@@somedud1140 he played 12 singles matches last year, won 6, and it was his first "pro" year winning less than $2500. She started in 2022 and has already won $1 mil. She definitely has far more experience in front of a crowd.
it was a great match, very entertaining. especially the 1st set when difference in stamina wasn't really a significant factor yet. I wish both athletes the best in their careers.
Nothing but respect for them both playing this and giving it their best. Especially Andreeva who goes into something like this knowing millions of people will say she should have lost if she loses, and that the guy must have been paid or tanking if she wins
I don't understand why this is even discussion ofcourse a guy with God given advantages will win over a woman at the pro level. Just it being competitive just shows you also how good the top women are also. Let's just enjoy the atp and wta without these useless comparisons.
Technically she was better at hitting her spots (as expected of a WTA player of her rank), but then it becomes the difference between 55mph and 70mph on the groundstrokes. She had to paint lines to pass him, while he didn't have to be as precise to pass her. Being stronger, taller, and faster on the court makes a HUGE difference that only truly transcendent skill can overcome, even against a player with a total of 6 ITF wins to his name.
@@HeavyTopspin we're talking about the 50 best woman in world, she has a team around her to help her acheive this technicity. A lot of variaty on the backend as well. but overall you've nailed it
Mira did well. The main difference was the male player having a bigger serve and able to win so many free points or create so many short balls. Rally’s wise they were evenly matched. This guy wipuld probably lose to iga or sabalenka. They have more weapons than Mirra.
@@kleeftonI agree. Top 70 = high skill level and accurate shot placement. But she’s a 16 year old girl, so impossible to compete athletically against a man. So her strategy must be: go for long rallies because his ranking of 1,100 means he will make unforced errors. And for him: his strategy should be to hit harder or to places a girl cannot run fast enough to be able to return a shot. Deep to her opposite corner followed by a drop shot. And try to end rallies quickly via power shots because long rallies favor her accuracy over his.
I really appreciate Andreeva playing this match. She could have had a day off for rest during the tournament which might have been a benefit. They gave a good show for the fans who came to the tournament. She is a fighter with good speed around the court. She could be really, really good as her game matures. It was an exhibition and they wanted to make it entertaining for the fans. I think the first two games, he didn't think he had do too much to win or was nervous that he didn't want to be seen as picking on a little girl. After that, he realized that he had to take it more seriously and play hard or he would get beaten badly. He upped his effort and they played evenly for a while, which is what you do in an exhibition. At 5-5, not wanting to lose the set, he started to play more aggressively, hitting closer to the corners, running her more, and advancing to the net when appropriate. At 5-1 in the second, he either got lazy or gifted her a game to make the score look better. She did a good job of making him play hard to win.
This is what I saw too. He was playing for fun and to keep it interesting. He wasn't going to let her win but wasn't playing to win most of the time. The first two games caught him a little off guard and needed to seek out the right level to play at. Without question she still made some nice shots and he made some real mistakes. She played a very clean game, but when he stepped up the heat, it was like he was a different player. Maybe he is naturally a hot/cold player like that, but I doubt it. Second set she was just too gassed. In some ways, it would have been interesting if she won the first set. Would she have pushed the second set harder or play more defensive, and make the push in the third?
When I was a junior, I played against a lot of top nationally ranked women. I’d win almost every match. If it went to three sets, I would win for sure. However, sometimes I’d lose the first set because getting used to the different pace and playing style can be difficult. Although I was usually more consistent, I couldn’t believe how they’d try to attack almost every single shot no matter what I was throwing at them and they wouldn’t care if they missed. This sometimes paid off for them. Also they are very good at attacking second serve and the return of your return forcing you to have the start the rally with low and fast paced balls which you’re not used to and can throw you off
@@OscarEggen I don’t think do. He’s just recounting his experience to add context to what we just watched. I found his post interesting. I think you misunderstood his motive.
@@OscarEggen His experience is very interesting, adds great value to the context of this match. I appreciate his efforts to provide his experience. I hope he continues to provide his insights by ignoring mean people out there.
Fascinating match. He was completely unprepared for her consistency and ability to adjust to pace. He, on the other hand, really didn’t have a lot of variety in his game and he really pushed to assert himself with high-risk bombs in the first set. After those first 3 games, he finally adjusted to longer points, played for consistency and never looked back. Her body language was super interesting to watch as he’d effortlessly chase down excellent drop shots. Clearly she wasn’t used to that male first-step power. At the end of the day, she looked far more refined than him in her game. That may be the result of coaching and resources. I highly doubt that a guy at his level has a lot of his own money to spend on elite coaching.
Correct. He made a little over $2,000 in singles prize money for all of 2023. Probably didn't cover travel to the tournaments. He's basically an amateur who has to have another job, or parents who pay for everything.
Very competitive match! Congrats to both players. It actually was pretty close. I remember Chris Evert saying when she was no 1 in the world I think, that her brother, who was a college player, not even sure if he was ranked, could still beat her.
Yep. Serena Williams was asked how she'd go against Andy Murray (I think it was 2016 after each had won Wimbledon). She said if she was given two points (30-0/0-30) each game, he'd still probably beat her 6-0.
@@Hiltok She also said that she really doubted she would win a single rally against Federer. And still she made more money than him. Doesn't sound fair, does it?
If we reward results in what they play against, then it’s plenty fair that Serena earned equivalent or maybe more money. I like both the men’s and women’s games and watch quite equally. Both should be rewarded for their efforts equally. Both are arguable GOATS for their divisions in the sport. Seems plenty fair to me that they made a shit ton of money. I don’t think Federer cares either way. Federer makes money off of the Women’s game by the way. He has a sports agency. His Agency is an agent of Coco Gauff. She is sponsored by a couple of Federer’s other companies. He profits off of the women’s game, so again, I don’t think he gives a shit what Serena got paid.
@@TheGeorgeD13 I agree with you. In any event, sports don't pay for 'fairness'. They pay for entertainment, and the top level of women's tennis delivers on that.
Remember, she can probably afford coaching unlike him. Kudos to him. He really prroved why men are leagues above women in tennis and why there is a division.
I started playing Tennis when I was 17 and I advanced pretty quickly, as I loved it. 3 years later, I was in college, and the D1 women's team was ranked around 25 in the nation. I'd struck up a friendship with the number one women's player, and played her twice in matches, losing both times, though the scores were close (6-4, 7-6 was one; I don't recall the other, but it was something similar). Physically, we were pretty equal, both weighing around 145 lbs., but mentally, her 15+ years of competitive tennis beat my 3 years pretty handily, as she seemed to win the big points.
It was quality tennis with very few errors. Andreeva did very well, did not give up even though her stamina lowered a bit at the end. She will go far! I think it was a great idea from the organisers, the crowd got to see a matchup that is very rare and it was an entertaining match.
Not an avid tennis fan but I would have expected the outcome to be a bloodbath so congrats to the young lady for an amazing performance, wish her a very succesful carreer. Also hat off to the guy, took some balls to play this game and risk being remembered as "that guy who got beaten by a girl" forever.
@@dandiehm8414Well yeah, but even rank 1045 is much better than 99% of people. You'd think by that point that the skill level would still be high enough that the physical advantages would be able to dominate more than they did. This result seems to suggest that if they got a top 10 women's player she might have had a serious chance of winning. Which is interesting given in most sports even the best women in the world would seriously struggle against even semi-pro men. Like how in football/soccer the best women's teams in the world get beaten 10-0 by teams of 14 year old boys playing for unremarkable American teams.
@@pauthang2439 and remember that she is a small 16 woman and has only played against women while he is a grown up and strong man that has always played against men. Ranking is meaningless if you don't compare at least the body size and power. Best female athlete on 100m track runs as fast as 1400th male athlete. Yes, men hit stronger and run faster, please compare what's comparable and look at her great technique and consistency.
@@johnkofi-theultimatelife1315 no doubt about her technique and consistency. but like you said men hit stronger and run faster. Even if she is playing against a small 16 man and who has similar training like her, that 16 year old will beat this girl. no knock on this girl but that is the biological realty. also, the stats about best female athlete on 100 m tracks runs as fast as 1400th male athlete illustrates that point as well.
@@pauthang2439 yep, let's just stop comparing rankings, it doesn't make any sense. This proves that Tennis doesn't rely on technique and skill as much as power and speed.
The progress of the match well reflects the two respective different rankings: Andreeva n° 57 is more accurate in placing the ball in the opponent's court, she makes fewer mistakes and has a more varied strategy; Ghazouani, n° 1145 is very good at hitting the ball, but he makes a lot of unforced errors, especially when the point needs only to be closed. The big difference lies in their respective physical strength. Andreeva spent a lot to stay at Ghazouani's athletic level in the first set and in the second she almost ran out of gas. Good match, anyway.
Andreeva shows as 12.61 UTR for singles and Yanis shows as 13.25. The outcome was pretty close to expected. Iga shows 13.30, Gauff 12.97, Pegula 12.93.
Apparently he was not prepared for the match, not to mention mentally playing a female. If she were male with the same game, he would prob have won more easy.
it's hard playing against a woman for a man, the returns come much slower and that ruins your timing, you make mistakes you wouldn't with the ball moving at the speed you are used to. You could tell that as the match went on he was slowly adjusting and eventually his power and endurance were always going to be too much for her. She is used to playing 3 set matches, he is used to playing 5 sets, that will always ultimately give a man a massive advantage. I don't know why the women haven't been moved up to 5 set matches, they get paid the same as the men but if a woman plays every round and goes 3 sets, her maximum sets played would be the the same as the minimum sets played by the men. I don't see how that is fair or equal, personally.
absolutely agree it is really tough playing women in singles because the ball comes much more flat without the powerful topspin and it's really hard to rip the ball on the return because the timing is totally different it's almost like playing a different sport.@@bipolarminddroppings
@@yamamancha that's absolutely true when it boils down to technique and strategy and also fitness, women don't train for five sets. tennis is one of the toughest professional sports on the planet, next to MMA, is absolutely amazing the level of fitness and training it takes to become a successful professional tennis player. only a thousand or so can survive at any one time on the circuit and 50% of those have to rely on local sponsorship or daddy's money. it's a tough life, I don't know why they don't make more movies about tennis players because it is an interesting topic.
More respect for the male player. He is not even making a living playing tennis and he is not used to big crowds watching his matches, so he had to get used to his surroundings. If the male player won it was expected, it the male player lost he would be ridiculed, even though the female player is ranked 57.
Don't you feel sorry for the guy? He's obviously a better tennis player than she, but she will become a millionaire, and he won't even be able to live of his tennis.
I don’t see why you would feel sorry for the guy? He’s not a very skilled player compared to the woman. He won simply because of testosterone giving him way more power and speed than she’ll ever face in the women’s game. If he had the power of a woman, he’d lose badly due to his comparative lack in skill. His only hope of winning was to be a man. To rise in the ranks in the men’s game, he needs to up his skills quite a bit.
