Where Do Electrons Get Their Everlasting Energy? 

Spoiler alert: NO ANSWER GIVEN

In other words, they dont know.

“Definitely not an orbit” *perpetually depicts orbit models*

Electron walks into a bar and starts critisizing everything: the bar is filthy....the beer is flat...the waitress is ugly. Bartender says: Why are you so negative?

Funny thing about quantum mechanics is that it's similar to abstract art paintings. Everyone pretends to understand it...

Electrons get their energy from drinking RedBull, it gives them wings.

I think we know far, far more about outer space than we ever will understand about "inner space".

Amazing that a few people figured this out over a hundred years ago. The rest of us today are left scratching our heads at an algebra problem.

Thank you for explaining from where do electrons get their everlasting energy. Based on the sofisticated explanation seems like actually nobody knows from where !

This video doesn’t answer the question it asks.

Nobody knows from where electrons get their energy. But the particle physicists definitely are clueless 😂😂😂

I would have loved if they teached us the theory in this detail in our schools rather than just giving us formulas and doing random calculations for exams

You did not answer your own question, where do electrons get their everlasting energy. Supposedly all elementary particles get their mass from the Higgs field, maybe it provides energy also? Just asking!

Very nice video and review. Reminded me of why I like physics & chemistry, had flashbacks to learning about orbitals & electron shells over 50 years ago. Should've mentioned electron state jumping from shell to shell though. And you really didn't explain where the energy comes from, which was the title that drew my attention.

If she said how the energy doesn't deplete I completely missed it

It appears that the thing that has saved Quantum Mechanics is its incredible prediction accuracy, which has been used in practical engineering. Its inability to “make sense” has been long forgiven and forgotten, except by die hard academics still searching for “meaning”.

Did not provide the answer for "WHERE..." electrons get their perpetual energy.

Hmmm. I'm still not getting this. Unless electrons are either static "somethings", or travel unimpeded in a straight line, it seems to me that they still have some sort of limitless energy. Somehow I'm still missing something in this explanation.

At their own tiny gas stations

Thank you for the effort of creating this video! You chose very beautiful images and was very careful to explain the electron properties. I believe you have a lot of potential for possible improvements in your future videos. Firstly, I would dedicate more attention to a proper ending or conclusion to the videos. The ending here was pretty much abrupt. You do not necessarily have to follow the formula "subscribe, thanks for watching, etc", but you might think about the art of story telling. You are trying to tell a story, an arch which has an introduction, a question or problem being answered, and at the end a conclusion. Some other channels might give you good ideas on how to do so. I think your English pronunciation is pretty good. I am also a non-native speaker, I am from Brazil. I would just work on the pronunciation of some words which begin with "w", which were being pronounced as if it was German, with a "v" sound... It took me some time to understand some words and that you were trying to make an analogy with falling into a "well". Keep it up! I wish you all the best for your channel.

If we name a rule then we can pretend to understand it with no freaking idea what enforces that rule, or where that rule came from. We just say, "Because that's Bob's Rule!!".

Everything has a vabration as long the temperature is over absolute zero... It might take up energy from the surroundings

well explained but billions of years old electrons how do they continue their energy state? ae we living inside a simulation andinorde for simulation to constantly continue it is then constantly energised?

This sounds like every energy that the electron looses in the lowest energy level is directed directly back to itself. That could happen if space is bent inwards in all directions toward it. This is in a sense expected, as without the trick of renormalisation the electrin should have infnite energy and hence create a singularity. The question is: why would such a singularity/black hole only affect the electron and nothing else around it?

Physical reality looks and acts like a big perpetual motion machine. Every perpetual motion machine has a hidden supply of endless energy. You have not found the supply yet. You have found a way to swim around in the weirdness of science.

Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .

Bottom line: we can observe how the world works but not explain the how or why?

Very descriptive....still haven't answered the question though. Why is there any energy at all?

You forgot to answer the question? There are some good pointers here from followers. The question about electrons is a good one. Try again.

If only this video existed when I went to school - so good

Sometime we have issues with perception;, electrons move close to speed of light, so, for them the time is almost frozen, they have a very short time in they'r time, but in our time they have infinite time, and the orbit can be explained as; electrons move in the strait line in they'r perspective, but the proton curve the space, so for us and the protons, electrons seems to spin around the proton, that's why a number of protons can retain a fixed number of electrons on they'r orbit, atoms with more electrons decay to they'r stable form, in they'r perspective instantly, in ours depends of the stability of the atom, if they have less electrons they will capture electrons till become stable. But we need to always depict subatomic particles as they travel at close to the speed of light, so, they'r energy dissipate very quickly in they'r time as observers, but in ours as observers seems that they have infinite energy not being able to explain why they don't slow down or collapse into the nucleus.

“An orbit is a state of constant acceleration”, this is a bit misleading. What they mean is it is in a constant state of change of direction. Although it may maintain the same rotational velocity, because it isn’t moving in a linear way, it is accelerating rotationally.

I always wondered about that. Kept me up nights, it did.

How spooky, I had just asked myself this question a couple of days ago and YT presents me this video.

IF you can answer the title question correctly, you can go collect your Nobel prize.

I'm going to watch it again.

We go in circle. The rules and principles were discovered to explain the behavior of the electron. And then we say the electrons must behave this way because of the rules we discovered. This is not science.

I heard some where that an electron can only be excited once. is it true ? If yes then plz tell me why, i couldn't find it on net

The nucleus imparts a wave function energy onto the electrons, giving them a probability cloud around the nucleus. In free space electrons lack this energy imparted from the nucleus and only has it's spin up or down energy and behaves as a point particle.

We can observe , measure and classify beyond that I don't think we know much .

Electron: Dude, check those bodatious vaves.

Could it be that, matter inside a black hole is turned into energy? An (almost) infinitely small energy field with (almost) infinite energy?

So the question still remains without the answer?

PERIODIC TABLE OF THE ELEMENTS: Potential completion of the Periodic Table of the Elements: I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2). Chemical Element #119 (8s1): #119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell. Chemical Element #120 (8s2): #120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars. When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way. In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically). If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better. (Except of course for those who might be in the way of a periodic nova or supernova. They might have a no good, very bad, horrible day.)

All physical systems seek to lose their energy as fast as their environment will allow. A cup of hot water will cool faster when placed in a cold room than if placed in a warm room. But when the temperatures are balanced, then no more cooling will occur and no more energy is lost. The electron does not have everlasting energy, it just exists in a environment that does not permit it to lose energy

So where energy electrons get? The answer is that if electron and proton is a particles the electron try to satisfy positive charge of proton. The biggest force of attraction is in opposite site of electron positional. So electron like entropy goes where biggest attraction. So from here is coming Heisenberg principle, - we get probability of electron . The question is why electron not fall to proton to make neutron answer is how neutron star forming , - after big explosion where force of proton repel force was overcome

I think electrons get there energy from the fact that they trade charges from each other. The duality of everything thing in the universe is crazy from the micro to the macro

The electron does not have a cloud of probabilities. The cloud of probabilities exists only in our observations -- i.e. when two quants interact.

I was hoping you would explain if the electron violates the first law of thermodynamics. Is the electron in perpetual motion?

What I find absoloutely amazing, and to also add incomprehensible, is that it was 'discovered' (or determined?) that electrons spin - snd this was in c.1932!!

Thank you very much.

Thanks for the video and all the data provided in it. I have only one question: where do electrons get their everlasting energy?

Thank you!

The origin of matter and energy is unknown to a rigid physical scientific model. We are far too arrogant and blind to improve the prime analysis (Socrates) and the improved version of it, the scientific method (Francis Bacon). “Beyond the veil of time and matter does the truth lie in wait, but therein it will be far too late.”

so if electrons arent made out of anything smaller (possibly out of those energy waves) does that mean that every single electron in the entire universe has the same mass?

As Luke Skywalker may have said, "Amazing,, every word of what you just said is wrong." Electrons are enclosing shells, not orbiting moons. Spin and magnetic moment come from their extended structure. The ground state isn't the lowest possible energy state, just the first nonradiative state.

Memories of Fermi-Dirac statistics in Quantum Statistical Mechanics....

It’s something we derive power from by movement. A negative charge attracts a positive charge, and so on. 💯🤟

Now I understand, positive repels negative because of Pauli and there are neutron stars and black holes.

Think about permanent magnets. Put 2 ring magnets on a shaft, same poles facing, and they will stay repelled for a very loooooong time. Not quite a perpetual motion machine, but certainly a machine close to doing perpetual WORK (ie. lifting the weight of the magnet on top).

This was very enjoyable.

Is it possible that after a collapse to a black hole there's something else that prevents gravity from an infinite collapse? Another "quantum barrier"?

Light supports most particle behaviour.

Thanks a lot

1:43 - They are not orbits; they are orbitals. This distinction is important.

A magnetic field can generate energy. The nuclei are charged when they enter the sun’s magnetic field. Then they reach out around them and grab free uncharged protons that are floating nearby. This explains the ring of fire around the perimeter of the sun’s magnetic field. Dark matter are just uncharged protons that have not been able to find a charged nuclei

"Then from that gigantic form of Mahā-Viṣṇu, Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu expands and enters into every universe. From Him, Brahmā, Viṣṇu and Śiva expand. Viṣṇu as Kṣīrodakaśāyī enters into the hearts of all living entities, as well as into all material elements, including the atom. The Brahma-saṁhitā says, aṇḍāntara-stha-paramāṇu-cayāntara-stham: (BS 5.35) “The Lord is within this universe and also within every atom." Krsna Book, 87

From the universal energy locker under e for electron.

Thank you for this simple explanation. Unfortunately, I'm too simple to understand a word of it. If anybody wants me I'll be off watching Bugs Bunny cartoons.

I have a passing interest in advancements in science as it helps in my abstract and spiritual retrospections. The following musings are one such, I grant that I maybe entirely wrong.

I found myself thinking, "liken it to a vell?" and then "Liken this to a vave". I figured out from the accompanying video that she meant "well" and "wave"

still doesn't answer the question, in the end it is just orbiting the nuclear perpetually from where its energy it get?

I guess we don't really know. But, we have learned how to make use of those ting charged little darlings, and we are thankful for that. We may never "know" what the universe is about because we are just beginning to understand, model, the physiscal world we perceive, as we percieve it.

From the neighbour universe sheet, because electrons are not particles: They just seem to be particles when intersecting wiht our sheet.

Very informative 😮!!

A perfect parody of the imagination of people in Physics who find an excuse in Mathematics to 'explain' what they are only guessing at.

Sounds like perpetual motion?Since all particles gained their energy from the start( big bang?)and still have the same energy,it seems.

Ahhhh! Well, that explains it... I still have no freaking clue what "it" is. But that explains it.

You do know electrons don't actually orbit rhe nucleus, right? Why do your graphics show them doing so?

From 220 v you get it and 340 v

Super cool, but what on earth is a valve in this context?

"IF" my current theory of everything is correct, currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test, but 'if' true, then the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up space and time itself as well as everything else in existence. TOE Idea: Short version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test): The 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this universe. The strong and weak nuclear forces are derivatives of the electromagnetic ('em') interactions between quarks and electrons. The nucleus is a magnetic field boundary. 'Gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. THEORY OF EVERYTHING IDEA: Revised TOE: 3/25/2017b. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. (The 'stationary photon' does not really exist, it is mentioned basically only to help describe what a stationary photon would do.) 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.

Electeons are my favorate particle.

So are we supposed to tell YOU where electrons get their energy - because that question was not answered in the video.

“If u want to understand the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy frequency and vibration.” Nikola Tesla

😅😮😅😮😅😅😅😅well information good show you 😅😅😅

Just your daily dose of "scientific" ChatGPT videos.

Is it really a cloud of probabilities or does it just behave like that from our observations?

Imagine a PhD level texts in front of nursary children. common people's and just similar in understanding and intrests for quantum physics..

Wouldn’t this come down to quantum physics that mere mortals can not understand?

Great Vid but bottom line is (same as Philosophy) "It is stranger than we can think" RBS Haldane.

So when an electron falls below the lowest possible energy state is falls into the nucleus and interacts with a proton to create a neutron?

Infinity = video explaining this video, then a video to explain the explaination, then a video to explain that explaination video etc. . . .

Not a physicist, but based on your explanation, a black hole ought to have infinite density, meaning it is a TRUE solid, with no space between electrons, protons, and neutrons inside the black hole. If this is true, then it would explain how a black hole can emit energy, since effectively, a black hole is a "gigantic atom" that once it gets to a point where not another particle can be added, it must emit excess particles or that would break the basic fundamentals of quantum mechanics. We do see this with a few images that have been taken of black holes. They are not purely "black". There are emissions coming out.

Good point but how does electrons in an electric circuit work?

I am a commerce student and going deep into science makes me curious it feels like magic and when you dont understand a thing but you like it, mesmerised by it..we generally call them god or godly creature..is not it

You never answered the question from the title.

Great.

1...so from where the electron is getting kinetic energy...? 2...electron is orbiting and electron is orbiting and travelling ...so in both condition it will radiate energy....??? 3...what is difference between radiation and emitting

What happens of they stop spinning?