WHICH GAME IS BETTER? Ghost Recon Breakpoint vs Ghost Recon Wildlands 

Alright I keep getting comments about this so o figured I’d just explain it in the comments. I messed up in the video when I said the Nomad from Wildlands and Breakpoint are different characters. I know they are the same, at the time of making this video for some reason the fact that they had different voice actors made me think they were different characters. That’s my bad though sorry.

You forgot to mention that Bolivia feels like a living, breathing, populated place with a history and a culture, while Auroa feels barren

The whole killer robot is thing is just too corny for me wildlands is way better

Give me EVERYTHING Wildlands with Breakpoint Graphics and I'm set.

My vote will always be Ghost Recon Wildlands And more I already defeat every bosses except for El Sueno

Wildlands: > Story - Realistic > Bolivia - lively with all civilians, topography, weather and have a radio station that is funny > AI Teammates - more controlled (as of last update) > SKill Tree - simple and easy to use > Enemy AI - Cartel is deadly, Unidad is VERY deadly Breakpoint: > Story - Too much sci fi (too many drones and terminators) > Auroa - dead island, not much civilians, just full of so called wolves, no radio stations, wandering around the world is boring > AI Teammates - more dumber and the control system is messed up, they just made it more complicated > Skill Tree - a mess really > Enemy AI - dumber than wildlands really, Wolves are supposed to be SF guys right? UNIDAD is a way deadlier enemy not to mention Los Extranjeros. You think the latest update in BP is challenging, try Ghost Mode (extreme).

The few things in breakpoint that I wish Wildlands had: 1.helmet attachments go on helmets you already have instead of getting a whole new helmet 2.prone camo 3.hiding bodies 4.boots tucked in 5.more paint options on clothes and accessories 6.coming to breakpoint in a few days - choosing what weapons your ai teammates use. Wildlands is the better game and those things listed above were some of the only things Ubisoft got right with BP

I don’t know, I feel like Nomad is way more interesting in Wildlands than Breakpoint.

After playing for more than 200 hours with my friend I personally I love Wildlands more than Breakpoint. Be it with controls, map and also the Tier difficulty (optional) which makes it more challenging.. Vehicle control is a bit odd in Breakpoint and slower than Wildlands.

Another thing to add, and this goes along with the boring travel of Breakpoint. There are no radios in the vehicles, and without the casual chatter of a squad, you're just left with dead silence on your travels. But to give Breakpoint a piece of credit, the injury system is pretty cool (in my opinion), there's something satisfying about limping your way out of enemy lines, sneaking through the jungle as you try to get back to a bivoac to heal... I guess with Breakpoint and Wildlands, the phrase "One step forward, and two steps back" come to mind

I feel as if one of the best parts of Wildlands is that you can make a connection to the story because it's actually happening around the world so it's more realistic and you can make yourself feel like your actually there

I'm out here still playing future soldier

Wildlands is a quite brilliant game. Breakpoint is simply fine. It does feel a bit rushed. I wish Ubisoft wouldn't do this. They don't need to. It harms their reputation. I get the impression that if the suits could just be compelled to take a back seat and let the talented developers do what they do you'd have a great company on your hands.

Just FYI, Wildlands has a far larger map than breakpoint. On top of that, the map is a lot more diverse. There are way more biomes in wildlands than there are in breakpoint and they all feel distinct.

They need to make a ghost recon while there in the middle east or sum, like Afghanistan or Iraq or sum idk

Wildlands: We will give you the customization options necessary to look any way you want. Breakpoint: We will be removing all the customization. Here’s a BDSM suit and night vision goggles. Have fun.

Here's my take in Breakpoint v Wildlands. Breakpoint has some improvements, them being moving bodies, prone camo, cosmetics, and thats about it. Breakpoint is missing 70% of what made Wildlands the masterpiece it was. To my knowledge, only 2 things from Wildlands have been incorporated recently (AI Teammates, Prone System) and nothing else. The things that make the game awful outweigh the improvements. Story, movement, ammo, difficulty, open world, Vehicles, etc. Story is horrendously setup, and the only thing that redeems it is Walker, which like you said, has very little screen time and no clear tie to Nomad (unless you played Wildlands which makes it understandable). Movement is meh, the only drawback being no strafing, but still, changes the game a lot. Ammo is god awful, they really need to go back to weapon type ammo, not caliber. If they go caliber, the need to at least get it right, because the Five Seven does not shoot 5.56 rounds, it shoots 5.7 rounds, hence being named, the 5.7. No challenge whatsoever, unless in extreme and maybe in advanced. There's no risk whatsoever to not going stealth, besides maybe one reinforcement caller who summons, at most, one heli that can get taken down in microseconds, where in Wildlands, if you weren't stealth, an alarm might go off, calling a heli, SB might call reinforcements, Unidad might get to level 4 patrol, etc. It was actually a dangerous situation. Not to mention Tier mode (fancier extreme difficulty) or Ghost Mode (perma-death) which made it all the more important to go stealth. The world is just barren. There has to be some kind of lore explanation for the lack of civies in the world, like a lockdown or something, because it is just empty as hell. Vehicles are terrible compared to Wildlands, specifically motorcycles. This isn't even the extent of the BS in Breakpoint, but I have a suggestion for difficulty. If Breakpoint gets the patrol level system incorporated for Wolves, it will be so much more fun and intense. Imagine getting chased through the jungle by 3 trucks and a helicopter. Imagine the Wolves actually feeling like trained forces (as they are literally former Ghosts) and being more challenging than Bolivian Spec Ops. If 4 Ghosts can dismantle an entire country, why can't an army of Ghosts take out 1-4 Ghosts? And also, get rid of gear mode and bullet sponging. It makes sense for the raid and behemoths but nothing else. I should be able to get an unsupressed Koblin Shot right through the little crack in the drone's armor and blow it up.

Personally I loved wildlands but I played it for to long I have over 1000 hours in wildlands so for now I like breakpoint more but if I had to choose it would be wildlands. LOVE UR VIDEOS

I uninstalled Ghost Recon Breakpoint as they ruined the game when they decided to have a Wolf Drone or Sky Hawk fly over every three minutes, along with magic spawning choppers every 30 seconds. Cheers Kit

Wildlands ftw . what sealed the deal for me was that breakpoint NEEDED to be always online which is ridiculous

Whenever I look at Wildlands environment I see myself exploring the terrain of Bolivia, tackling the Unidad and Santa Blanca. Whenever I see Auroa I see a sterile artificially created environment akin to a Jurassic world mutant which for all intents and purposes should look real and believable, but doesn't. I don't know why but there's something unnatural about the island that cannot be said for Bolivia. Maybe it's due to the Wildlands team actually travelling there and taking many photos and descriptions or maybe it was something else idk. But something is wrong.

God, breakpoint was my first ghost recon game, I had no knowledge about the games before hand and I was disappointed so much. I got wildlands recently and it is so much better

Our vote also goes to Wildlands. While both game has their pros and cons, Wildlands felt WAAAY more like a real location. Wildlands setting with civilians driving around and walking around bustling villas felt way more alive than Breakpoint, where practically every vehicle you see coming down the road is an enemy vehicle with a mounted machinegun. I don't know if that's the case with every version of Breakpoint on every platform, but it was certainly the case on the Xbox.

Imagine if they released a Wildlands Remastered with better graphics, the option to hide bodies and even more customizations. Granted, I've always loved the wildlands customization. I avoided breakpoint when it first released due to word of mouth advice from other gamers. It had a lot of issues I was brought aware of. It's been out for a good amount of time now. Is it improved? Is it worth purchasing while it's at a discount of $29.99?

I think the breakpoint open world is incredible, especially the jungle biomes. The issue is the giant mountains that make most of the map unplayable (completely correct referring to it as dead space)

Real Country, a living Gigantic, Atmospheric open World, No enemy drones, No futuristic overload, No Loot, No Hub. For me, the winner is very clear. With over 300 hr. Playtime, Wildlands is one of my favorite PS4 Games ever.

I'll save y'all 11 minutes. Wildlands.

wild lands is on a different level then breakpoint

I’m sorry but I’ve got to disagree with the points on the open world, breakpoints map seemed very similar all the way throughout with only three varieties: muddy green swampy/mountainous area, snowy mountainous area or urban hi-tech city/base. However wildlands was much more varied with desert, snowy mountains + salt flats, jungle and everything in between (by “in between” I mean that it transitions, for example where el sueno is located is mountainous but not snowy). As well as this wildlands map is bigger than breakpoints one, wildlands map is actually the biggest Ubisoft map yet interestingly. That being said, I agreed with, on the most part, everything else In the video. And also while I’m here nomad from breakpoint IS nomad from wildlands just in the future.

I agree that wildlands is the superior game for a number of reasons. But primarily because of the story. Breakpoint doesn't just have an obscure story, it also fails to make the villains, well... villainous. The sicarios in wildlands are blatantly evil - kidnapping, pillaging, corrupting the local government, crucifying dissenting locals, imprisoning rebels and locals, and using them for their rituals. You don't think twice about eliminating a Santa Blanca sicario. I do however have some reservations about eliminating Sentinel forces - which shouldn't be the case in a Tom Clancy game. Yes Sentinel forces look ominous, but are they evil like the sicarios? I would say that the Sentinel forces are more gray than black. At best they're bringing military strength to an otherwise vulnerable country. At worst, Sentinel is just... douchy. With the exception of Walker executing a fellow soldier, and Skell employees being forced to work on national defense, there's nothing all that compelling about eliminating Sentinel soldiers. Many of the Sentinel bases hold outcasts (rebels) as prisoners. The outcasts are regarded as terrorists even by Nomad. So why the hell am I ghosting an entire camp just to bust out a terrorist? That's drastically different than freeing rebels from the Santa Blanca camps. Ubisoft really didn't think that one through. The whole 'good guy gone bad' storyline has been used in so many Tom Clancy games that it's becoming cliche. It was used at least twice in wildlands, and now Ubisoft has based an entire game on it. It's simply unrealistic. The more a Tom Clancy game resembles real life, the more players will love it. Other things that breathed life into wildlands that are missing from breakpoint: a CIA contact (e.g. Bowman) to brief you on missions, AI teammates (as mentioned in the video), and entertaining radio. Those long rides to your mission are awkwardly quiet, and could sure use some music, or an Aurora version of DJ Perico. Who knows, there might actually be radio but I wouldn't know. The breakpoint audio glitches so often that I really don't know what I'm missing. Also the flight and driving physics is noticeably worse in breakpoint. And in breakpoint, you really have to grind for skill points. Wildlands had a better balance between effort and upgrades. One thing I would disagree with is Aurora having more environmental diversity than wildlands. Both have mountains, forests, and jungles. But wildlands also has deserts and salt flats. But despite the landscape graphics being worse in breakpoint, Aurora is more visually appealing. I guess that I'm too far into breakpoint to stop playing. Hope the ending doesn't suck as much as the wildlands ending.

I’m not even gonna lie. They should of just kept it rolling with the Fallen ghosts dlc instead of the campaign they put in breakpoint the skills were better and it was much more suspenseful

WILDLANDS hands down

For me Wildlands is better. There are only a few elements from Breakpoint that i would like in Wildlands. I always get the feeling that Breakpoint was originally supposed to be a Splinter Cell game game.

Loved Wildlands. One of my favorite Co Op games ever. Especially on the hardest difficulty. Tried to play Breakpoint, it does not have the same feeling as it's predecessor at all. And something that turned me down was the fact that it spawns enemies literally every 50 meters on the road. I just want to take it slow and enjoy the world. I don't need enemies exactly everywhere! And if I get spotted by that drone airplane, there will be enemies at my position in ten seconds, I mean come on?! And don't get me started on the drones. The game is not made for playing on the hardest difficulty, making it hard to play. Making me sad because Wildlands was such an awesome experience.

how could anyone score breakpoint higher for the map, it's literally a downgrade in all areas LMAO

It sucks that Breakpoint had to turn out so bad. The few mechanics and optimizations that DID IMPROVE from Wildlands would have been highly appreciated in Wildlands but alas everything else fell short. Breakpoint has damn near no soul. You're out in the wild and it's just a vast open space of nothingness. No decent ambient music, no populated villages, no signs of culture or civilization, no life to the land. Also I really want to know their design philosophy for even adding futuristic drones or some shit. I thought the idea for the sequel and truly what everyone wanted was a more immersive and realistic....? Anyways fuck it. It is what it is. Vote with your wallet. Don't give them money for chicken shit, that includes upcoming titles like Assassin's Creed Valhalla.

I think the wildlands is better. I do like some of the customisation from breAkpoint. The gear looks like the real thing. Hiding in the mud is a nice feature and the characters move like real operators. Ghost recon could make it more realistic, for example only having one primary weapon or Realistic back packs like the army actually uses. I believe the next game should be closer to milsim.

The open world comparison was bizarre. Breakpoint's world is empty, shallow and dead. Wildlands world feels lively with historical locations, traffic, people talking to each other, cooking, dancing, and kids playing on playgrounds. Music in wildlands makes exploration even more enjoyable, i almost never used teleportation, unlike Breakpoint where i couldnt bother myself travelling through the dead swamps and had to teleport every hundred metres

That's like asking what death would you prefer, death by fire, or death by fire ants? Both are excruciating but at least you stop feeling pain once the flames burn your flesh off. Neither is enjoyable. I'll choose any Assassin's Creed or Division game, however if the choice is truly limited to Ghost Recon, then I'd choose Wildlands because the quests meshed with the world design. In Breakpoint it did not. After barely escaping a horrific helicopter crash, losing 95% of my team of brothers, stealthily avoided numerous patrols to not trigger any alarms, armed with turn of the Century tactical hand me downs, a pistol and 3 magazines for C-TAR, I finally discover a small village of civilians. Speaking to an elderly fisherman, rather than ask for directions or assistance my character accepts a quest to return with scrap metal in order to help this unknown senior build a lure, with a gruff "Sounds good". No, this does not sound good. You're stranded on an island defended by helicopter eating drones and you have the utter lack of awareness to accept a lure crafting quest. I turned the game off and that was it. If a game is that corny while trying to be serious in the first few hours, what's it going to degrade to in the late game? lol

Wildland is a real treat...i find myself playing till this day...Bolívia is incredible....

WILDLANDS ALLDAY EVERYDAY, THE ONLY THING I WISH WILDLANDS HAD WAS THE ABILITY TO HIDE BODIES AND CUT THROUGH FENCES AND BARRIERS OTHER THEN THAT WILDLANDS ALLDAY EVERYDAY

Thank you for this mate, I think I'll definitely get Wildlands.

Well So Teammates are here on Ghost Recon Breakpoint, could you please make an updated video such as this?

Just finished the advertised "main campaign" and am utterly disgusted to the level money-grabbing it has become and how much of a downgrade it has been in terms of immersiveness and atmosphere compared to Ghost Recon Wildlands. The good side: The dirt simulation and terrain deformation are impressive, really liked the new camouflaging mechanic. guns sound pretty neat, the new micro-animations are pretty cool and eye-catching, you can only change guns at camps you make which is also pretty cool. You can craft some boosts for your activities with gathered resources (collecting plants, killing animals) such as medical syringes, stamina boosts, fatigue boosts, collecting water to avoid dehydration, etc. Climbing physics has been improved a lot, and if you get fatigued, you will slip your balance while running downhill which is pretty cool. If you get severe bullet injury or deep cuts, you player struggles to run and if you get more injuries your player has to drag himself to safety while using a shaky sidearm as the only usable weapon as you apply bandages and medkits, the animations for applying the bandages are also impressively neat and realistic. You need to hide bodies after you kill them to avoid raising alerts and the security drones make it challenging enough. The car handling is much smoother now and there are a lot of variations for some weapon models such as the AK47, which can be found in 3 variants: 5.56 variant for CQC, normal variant for mid-range, assault variant for intensive fights (no suppressor), DMR variant for long-range combat. The variants are neatly detailed as well. The drones make it a little more challenging now and over-all, the mechanics and micro-animations, details, and graphics are pretty impressive. THE BAD SIDE: Firstly your AI teammates are *****g braindead robots that do not talk unless there's an enemy approaching or there's intel nearby. The "immersive new map" is ***** dead, there's nothing but trees and dumbass birds and pigs. You can't walk two inches without having a patrol sticking their nose in your butt. The civilian A.I is so annoying that it almost feels like the devs want to PUSH YOU TO massacre them. The map is really empty and filled with repetitive side quests. The side quests feel boring but must be done to purchase new gear. You need to buy useful weapons at shops now using in-game currency. Most of the weapons that can be collected in the world are pretty useless and a really big hassle to obtain. Useful attachments need to be bought from the shop, you cannot modify your weapon like Wildlands anymore, only able to change magazines and foregrips. You need to buy weapon paint from shops unlike Wildlands, each one priced at exasperating rates, Ubisoft tried to put in microtransaction with this tactic. good basic clothing that does not make you look like a hillbilly on a field-trip also needs to be bought from the shop and have disgustingly high rates. There are no special debriefs for each mission, only bland voice actings with A.I animated facial expressions that make it very boring to watch. Nomad's new voice actor sounds like he's trying WAY too hard to have a deep voice and sound intimidating. *SPOILERS AHEAD* They kill off Weaver, the character they developed in Wildlands at the first 10 minutes of the game and make Holt, a disabled NPC that lies on a med-bed for the rest of the game. Midas is captured but you need to pay Ubisoft more to get him freed. The story makes you feel like you're fighting on the wrong side of the team, I regret killing Walker and feel like I did more of a favor to the evil than the good. Not only does the story suck ass, but you also don't even get the entire conclusion of the story in the 50 dollar game you buy. You need to spend another 30 dollars to get the year-pass to get the rest of the story and conclusion, they're not even DLCs. The atmosphere and the character interaction are so generic and Hollywoodized you almost cringe while playing them. The only character I grew an attachment for and was impressed by was Walker, who you need to kill off. Walker's character has a proper backstory, has proper development that justifies his necessary evil. His character in-game is also very realistic. His character makes me wish there was an option to join his cause. On the other hand, you have Nomad who is just a dumb muscle with a dumb voice and no broad vision. The tactical bits of the game were fun to play but the ambiance of the was very poor, which makes it irritating to play. The atmosphere has no proper identity and all the sheer number of soldiers you kill (most of which are innocent) HEAVILY outweighs the number of killings done by Walker and almost makes you feel like the villain here. Then there's the microtransaction you need to pay to complete the rest of the story. In my honest opinion, I would not even recommend playing it if it was cracked. They gave a half-assed story and tried to extend it like a TV show. I went back to play Wildlands after I played Breakpoint, and Wildlands, with its 1000000 more bugs and performance issues than Breakpoint, felt more immersive and fun to play. I would stop waiting for the crack if I were you

Who would like a wildlands remastered, with better movement and more tactical movements and tactical gameplay

There are a few things that you left out that make Wildlands even better. 1. Breakpoint has so many more bugs 2. Breakpoint’s bullet physics are terrible. Bullets will go straight and then just drop off of a table while Wildlands gives guns more range a smoother bullet drop. 3. Wildlands allowed you to drive through the open world without being insta spotted while driving. If you drove at a regular speed, then you didn’t look suspicious, so the enemy ai would assume you were just any other driver. I know that Breakpoint is under marshal law, but that just leads me to the next point. 4. Wildlands world was much more alive and filled with people that made it seem like the real world. If you crash your car, or it gets blown up by an enemy, it’s really hard to get a new vehicle because there are no civilians to take the cars from.

I LIKE more now Breakpoint cause the new Teammate EVENT,,before i LIKE WILDLANDS MORE cause that,,but if in Breakpoint we can use the Teammate this make the diferents,,I LIKE MORE NOW BREAKPOINT CAUSE TEAMMATE,PICK PLANTS AND SO MANY THINK I LOVED:)

as a brazillian, I would love to see a GR game here, dealing with the corruption of the state and the gangs in our "favelas", and we can also see some wildlands connection, since Brazil and Bolivia are next to each other.

I've spent hundreds of hours in wildlands to reach Tier 1, replaying missions over and over again but its still more enjoyable than breakpoint. I remember walking around villages in wildlands it feels "real", while in breakpoint u cant do that anymore because of wolves and DRONES!!. YES, Wildlands is 100% better than Breakpoint. If you want to play open world realistic milsim shooter arma 3 is the best option

I bought the wildlands after the breakpoint. After experiencing the wildlands I returned and played the breakpoint. I spent 15 minutes to realize how monotonous and lifeless the breakpoint is compared to the wildlands. I like them both, but now I'm going to Wildlands.

Wild land is better in every way.U can ride around the world without getting detected by a damn drone every 5 min. No drone fight. The map on breakpoint is big but it feels annoying to explore due to drone.

Totally agree with your points here. Nice organized video as well!

me watching this having both games trynna decide which one I should play today

Whenever I play Breakpoint, I miss the little things like the rebels talking, the civilians in the streets, the RADIO STATION while driving Bolivia felt better than Auroa, the games have very different feelings But, with the update, Breakpoint was improved. WIldlands is just better

Breakpoint has a lifeless empty huge open world. Wildlands has a good open world with people and villages and rebels that will help you out thro your journey ! Breakpoint has repetitive missions. Wilands has a decent Variety of missions.

Great video! I like the format and completely agree with your opinions

1 vote for BP, I love to play like a lonewolf, Survival, one thing about BP that make me enjoy is when i decide to go some place i must think how to move, how to get thing done without enemy detect and survive when all enemy rush on me, i don't give a shit how many drones they have because it's not too hard to beat them. WL is better in some perspective for me but BP is my choice if i have to vote. BTW cut scene in BP it's pretty boring..

It feels like Ubisoft is divided between making good games and making buggy half-baked cash grabs

Wildlands is way better. Breakpoint feels like a shitty version of Metal Gear Solid

They added teammates now but that still doesnt change the fact they don't act like operators. Both Wildlands and break point need a "keep tight" option so my teammates aren't sitting outside the base waiting orders and stack up when your infiltrating.

One thing that I really hate in breakpoint are the facial expressions

I think my most hated difference in Breakpoint is the civilian dialogue and behaviour. They're extremely irritating with their offended hipster voices. Also they way they barely react to gun fights in a logical way, instead just awkwardly crouching in place. I like that in Wildlands they would at least run away, sometimes being hazard and distraction to avoid shooting while they ran past you. On a side note, I especially loved how civilians behaved in Future Soldier in that they would first drop to the ground then slowly crawl away until finally making a run for it.

A agree until the open world part.. breakpoint is beautiful, but soooo empty! It is so boring to cross the differents terrains. If your lucky you will see 2 or 3 guys and a motocross every 10 minutes! But great video 👍

Going to get one thing straight the reason why you can’t holster your weapons in breakpoint it’s because you’re on a crash island with drones in the air that can cut you down in minutes That’s why you can’t holster your weapon

I've played every Ghost Recon, the whole brand. I actually prefer breakpoint than widlands. Btw breakpoint is just new and the dev are actually doing great choices for the rest of the game. So for me breakpoint is clearly better

Me : Making a very cool idea of Outfit GRB : Take it all out

remember me when u hit 1 million

Just subscribed because of your approach..I'm literally here to decide which to buy and didnt want spoilers..and you stated that..SUB EARNED 👌🏻😎

I only have one problem, why are you hating on Breakpoint so much? It literally came out less than a year ago, I like them both equally, but why are you hating on it, its was supposed to be the hunter becomes the hunted, and you say it's more difficult to stealth, but you can just camouflage in the ground. It seems to you are more bias towards wildlands.

Great vid man! An updated comparison vid would be interested as Breakpoint has had a year of huge updates plus bots now!

I think Wildlands does Nomad better than Breakpoint. He has just enough character given to you in conversations and cutscenes that you can grow some attachment to him and still role-play/imprint yourself onto him at the same time. Breakpoint nomad is like _TOO_ blank to grow an attachment too, and because he doesn’t get any nice development moments, as a player you don’t even really want to imprint yourself onto him.

Wildlands. Traveling civilians, roads that actually go between places (which made cars viable), no civilian vehicles or interaction, less gun customization, no annoying ass drones flying in the air and spotting you every time you move, shoot, or even shoot them down. There’s no such thing as stealth in this game

I wanna see ghost recon wild lands vs farcry 5

Honestly, wildlands just felt better. Breakpoint tried to bring realism, but felt like it didn't fully deliver. Wildlands made it feel like you were fighting a super powerful cartel and your gear did the job.

I'm watching this and heard you mention "I'm almost at 700 subscribers" and here you are almost to 9k. Congrats man

what i think people missed the point about breakpoint is, you are stranded and hunted, so no radio in and no ridiculous gaming crutches. In breakpoint, you can customize how you want to play which i loved very much. Injuries, short stamina and slow gameplay, no HUD etc. I just think breakpoint for me has more "realism" attached to it

I’ve easily put 1500 hours in wildlands and can easily say it was one of the most underrated games I’ve played. Considering how excited I was for Breakpoint to come out and fix some issues that Wildlands had suffered, I had little expectations. When I barley hit my 50th hour in Breakpoint, I was greatly disappointed because they had lost that spark that had made Wildlands special. I understand games have glitches and such but I believe when you develop a sequel to a game, that you add better weapons and such. After learning that Ubisoft put in the “Shoot to Loot “ I became uninterested immediately because I saw the pay walls that stopped me from playing that game. In my opinion, I wish I could get my money back from Breakpoint because the community on it is toxic, it’s hard to find a good solid team, and the gameplay itself isn’t something I can find interesting nor exciting. Even the map of Breakpoint makes little to no sense on how and why it is and where it’s at. All in all, Wildlands in my opinion easily scores a 9/10 on my list while Breakpoint is at 6/10. I hope in the future they remaster Wildlands because I will easily spend $60 again. Thank you all for reading and stay safe out there and keep on gaming!

Nomad is the same guy in both games that's why he is dressed the same in both games and had the same squad mates in both games even though they die in the beginning of Breakpoint.

I feel like wildlands is alive island with people driving car around the road and walking down the street but in breakpoint there's none of it walkin it's like a ghost island with absolutely nothing feel so empty on the island. So I prefer wildlands.

i didnt enjoy breakoint at all. what made wildlands for me was the immediate access to be able to get any gun and attachment you wanted from the start, you just had to find them. not to mention the customization. being able to larp any way i wanted was what keeps me playing wildlands to this day.

Wildlands feels like it takes years to finish the campaign or anything.

This video was well put together, you deserve more subscribers

what about pvp mode? the fact that breakpoint removed the character classes, and now turned anyone into a mini rambo?

A.I teammates are now in the game buddy!! Amazing video though keep it up

i need to add this, WILDLANDS HAS PERMADEATH!!!!

For me: Wildlands: big map with a lot of biomes, Bolivia feels alive with civilians, cars, planes. The story is.. Ok, but the best part is that you can focus on each region, for example you can clear pucara, collect everything, do all missions and after clearing the area you can move to another area, there's no need to jump around Bolivia. The weapon system makes you want to explore everything so you can unlock better gear Unfortunately the enemy AI is stupid to the point that is not exactly fair, enemy aways know where you are even if they didn't see you. But Unidad is deadly and challenging. Ok radio station and a relatively good soundtrack. I would say Wildlands is a 8/10 game, could have a better enemy AI (the same from breakpoint for example) As for Breakpoint The map is big but.. Feels empty, no cars on the road, less civilians, the island feels empty The story is OK too and I even liked the fact that is "near future", not a "star wars" future but a couple of futuristic things... But the big problem is, the story throws you around the island, so you can't focus on a specific region And to make things worst the "weapons with level" thing makes exploring useless because you can buy better weapons and things on the store, also, if you find a weapon on a crate, that's basically yours, so no point in exploring and finding blueprints to craft them because you will aways find a better one The AI is really good on flanking, hunting you, except for the reinforcements systems that is too weak, but breakpoint has a better enemy AI, enemy's move all the time looking for cover and really search you ass. Heavys are a cool addition but the enemy AI itself is not deadly as wildlands. I really don't mind the drones and tanks, I do like shooting them, the only "new" enemy that bothers me is the predator, that is more a inconvenience than a real challenge. Also, the damage system is broken, sometimes a enemy dies with one shot while you are playing stealth and sometimes it takes 5 shots to kill while in wildlands you can kill anyone with one shot when being stealth everytime. No radio, and barely no soundtrack. Breakpoint is a 4/10 game, it has better things over wildlands but wildlands is still better. Edit: I forgot to mention, the "hurt system" from Breakpoint is stupid, and the "sliding down the mountain" is stupid too and some of the animations (being hurt, healing, reloading special bullets) locking you in place is dumb too.

Following last weeks update on Breakpoint, they added AI teammates and have a mission that grants access to a missile strike similar to the rebel mortars in Wildlands. I would suggest either doing something like an updated video or something to compensate for the updates and patches.

The only reason I play Breakpoint is because you can customize your very own GI Joe character

I'll be in the minority, but I prefer Breakpoint across the board

I don't care what anyone says this is the highest quality review I've seen. There will always be something someone can criticize. Awesome job man - Big fan!

Hey assassin will you make this video again later when the updates for BP are live? And what I mean by that is when AI and new content is available in the game

Just bought ghost recon wild lands today, thank you for this video I’m really hyped to play. Just gotta wait for the download

Bruh.... lets just be honest, wildlands is way better then breakpoint and has way more story content

I remember in WL that the drugs are expanding in Asia, meaning that it could start another Wildlands-style game where the Asian variant of Los Estranjeros (forgot how to type it) could be in some bigger Unidad-style bases. Maybe this time we will be in the government's grace since they are not that capable tech wise and Rebels would be our enemies this time around. I could imagine that instead of El Sueño, we could get 3 main bosses called the "Trifacto" or something. Maybe Triads? Or El Sueño's brother or cousins? And they also revealed all possible Wildlands-style sequels: Africa, Europe, and Asia as the key places where the Santa Blanca Cartel previously sent alot of coca to (I just saw it in Bowman's briefing)

i’ve only logged about 5 hours in breakpoint, and i’m close to 100 in wildlands, and i feel very drawn to both games. my issue is the population on the island. there are nearly no civilians in breakpoint, and wildlands was bustling with activity. i feel like wildlands was perfect in that aspect, if they could have carried that over into breakpoint it would be the perfect sequel

I played Breakpoint first and liked it. Especially the immersive mode that has been added later. Than I got Wildlands in a sale and I thought this game felt like a true sequel. Much better Storytelling. Improved gameplay with more skills and possibilities to play the game. Also more condens believable world. Especially with adding civilians to the game that make the world much more believable. So I like wildlands more too. But both games are great

Breakpoint is 20$ rn and wild lands is 66 someone tell me witch I should buy

I think what needs to be done is a prequel to wildlands. A story wherein Nomad and the OG team becomes who they are as a team. I mean from Ukraine until Colombia, and at the game's final cutscene, was Nomad seeing that footage of El Sueño executing an entire Bolivian family. And also I really wanna know what happened "that one time". I still don't have the answer to that.

The better game is wildlands,,, More fun and better story and, Breakpoint is a downgrade

I agreed with everything except the open world scores. Bolivia felt so much more diverse and lived in than aurora. Breakpoint has better graphics but less substance. Also wildlands has this vastness that I can’t explain. The open world feels more open instead of a jillion randomly placed trees that all look the same like breakpoint