Which Game looks better Visually 

That's because they probably use the same engine but proceed to add more unnecessary and gamebreaking details and bugs which they don't bother to optimize the game

@@Chilllinus You must be blind bro, it is a game that looks next gen and yet can still be playable on a 1650.

They need to sell video cards, some are partnered with video card makers. So they add unneeded bloat to the game to "justify" the higher requirement.

look next gen for real ? You born in the fortnite era or what ? Batman Arkham Knight is the one looking next gen in comparison here

Optimization is a hell of thing

by*

@@met3uz854 uhhhhhhhhhhh NUH UH

Despite launching 8 years ago

Suicide Squade killed Rocksteady

Then bankrupt

Funny how the woke Devs justify ugly characters for "realism" then put a realistic looking characters into a hyper stylized fortnite looking world. When games goes woke, creativity goes to toilet, there is no dream and fantasy anymore, just a psychological cultural totalitarianism from the left.

alright this one was one of the best comments ive read on this

This comment is perfect

😂😂😂

Ak had a great story. The only bad moments were Jason's spoilers, that's literally it

AK's flaws weren't the story, it was the overuse of the Batmobile with the absurd number of tank battles and the lack of real boss fights; Especially when you consider that City and especially Origins had some pretty decent bosses

Fax​@@TheBowtieBatman

@@JThePervertedSummonerSometimes I think am the only one who enjoyed the tank battles I mean they are really easy

Not just story wise. Biss fights are garbage too. It didn't win goty unlike City

Cant wait till we can play Super mario bros with NES graphics that only runs on 90000$ GPUs . Thats next-degen im waiting for !

Bc instead of designing good looking settings and characters and art style, the main target is polygon count these days.

Exactly and the CPU usage is off the charts

Its a 4 player multiplayer with a bigger sized open workd that’s 48gb and it still manages to look decent

Knight runs amazing on my 4 year old i5 1050 laptop. Only things I have to turn down is the simulated smoke and debris.

confused water

Looks like jelly rather than water 😆

Jelly water

😂😂😂

I feel like the water animation is set to super speed I doubt they care looks like a low budget game I’ve seen better indie games that are cheaper and looked better with good performance

Games back then had more care and love and games today.

Metropolis in SS feels like Springfield from the Simpsons at times

@@ImTheReverse exactly nothing about the city screams alien invasion. It looks like an abandoned Disneyland

uuhhh except thats not true, arkham games always have this convenient excuse to not have npc, yeah yeah nice looking city but there is no one there

@@verguco6051 city and knight had penguin/joker/two face thugs and tyger/militia forces all over the map.

@@verguco6051 "Convenient excuse" Like city wide mayhem causing evacuation/ curfew (in origins) or the city you're in being a prison? SS has a valid excuse with the world being taken over but unlike arkham games it doesn't feel like a real place people do or have lived in but just an arena

Almost 70% of the UI elements are useless

their entire design philosophy seems to be to put as many things in your face at once constantly

Atleast half of it can be turned off thank god

its funny cuz right after we see the most poluted UI i've seen, we see the batmobile running with only a literal radar

Ubisoft sends its regards

It's funny because in its day I don't really recall arkham knight being adored. Maybe because of the rocky launch state, worse story than city (not bad but didn't maintain the extremely high quality I'd say), and people's concerns over the batmobile. But looking back, oh boy was the gameplay incredible. They really did follow through on "be the batman".

Agreed, same goes with Bioware.

⁠@@erikkreem3584people always complain I remember finishing Arkham Knight and loving it but as soon as I went on the internet everyone be saying they used the Batmobile too much and that the story was trash and Arkham city was better. Like enjoy the game it’s a masterpiece regardless if you think another game is better

Thanks, it makes me wonder what Rocksteady has been doing during these 9 years because the level of detail and graphics quality can be compared even to Arkham City

@@NikTek Wtf are you writing. AK is a single player and does not need to run on servers or on a netcode with different hardware, SS does need to do all of it. Multiplayer games have to have less cpu overload then sp games, meaning less destruction, less physics etc by the number of npc's alone in the game the cpu side of things is already doing a lot putting in more could be a problem. Just watch digital foundry.

product, not game

@@justdude8115real

@@justdude8115both are products

​@@fishfood8711 One is a product first and foremost, with everything added as selling points.

I'd be hesitant to call Suicide Squad a game. After all, games are supposed to be fun.

you could try beating him up XD

Ok that was really good😂

I thought cars would just bounce off without any damage just like every other modern trash, but i was impressed by the destruction physics, especially when you hit them in the batmobile.

wow that is an assault on the eyes. could not imagine buying this trash

Nah, that’s just Aquaman down there😂

He knows too much. Unplug him and end the sim now!

@@ShaneDehPain Check this video: "These Two Games are 13 Years Apart"

arkham asylum looks better than this slop

Batman on the SNES looks better

The delusion is crazy, I’m playing right now and the graphics and models are better than Knight, you saying it’s worse than city is ultimate hating

@@lTSVlBE you are one of 6k people that were dumb enough to pay $70 for this trash. really understand the magnitude of that. even the average idiot knew to stay away from this game but your stupidity knows no bounds. if you are actually just coping, i hope you know you can refund the game.

I think you mean Arkham Knight.

@@jamesmcdavid1673😐

🤓 ​@@jamesmcdavid1673

@@ShaneDehPain also environment artist they did great jobs they didn't care about how many copies it would sell they cared about core gameplay and game design

Honestly felt more like saints row there. Especially the purple countdown

Honestly, if you close your eyes it sounds like overwatch gameplay. Bleh

how else are modern games supposed to keep zoomers attention spans?

Shit looks like a mobile game ui

​@@steluste💀

​@@steluste this shit looks exactly like gangstar vegas

I use UE5 and I used UE3 is not the engine, is the lazy incompetent people that is being hired nowadays.

It's funny because i played Arkham Knight on release and the graphics were good but in that year i thought that those graphics were going to be the standard for PS4/Xbox/PC... i didn't realize that it would turn to be a new "crysis" of sorts

@@Archivosdelosvideojuegos I don't know man. All Unreal Engine 5 games look the same to me. All terrible. And then you have Unreal Engine 4 games like Callisto Protocol, FF VII Remake, or Gears 5 that look 10x times better than Unreal 5. Proprietary engines are by far the best though. They are unique in comparison to Unreal where all games look the same

@@Archivosdelosvideojuegos eh maybe it's true that developers didn't learn how to use the engine properly yet but it's also true that all UE5 games we got so far just look bland and blurry... They all look the same (bad) and run bad. Exactly why I don't play games using those engines, cause those games ore often lazy and aren't as good overall as games that use inhouse engine.

@@Johnny.1994 To me the best you can currently get is RE Engine. Looks really good, has the most realistic hair with hair strands in RE4R and has insanely good performance. Even with my AMD GPU I could play RE4R at max settings in 4k INCLUDING RT with 90+ FPS.

Just got to wipe the slate clean and start over again I suppose but I really look forward to hearing what Hundred Stars Studios gets upto now going forward after watching this disastrous shitshow

I'm glad the cofounders left the studio... The real rocksteady would never release such a game and disrespecting arkham batmans legacy

Nah, the artists pretty much do what they're told. Someone *_approved_* that UI. They should get the blame. Just look at 2:08. Jesus Christ... Everything is all over the place.

That’s what I was thinking lol

It moves in such gross and unnatural ways possible

@@ledorito9091 Rocksteady within 9 years forgot how water works lmao

why is the game's name so bih

If Knight was made out of passion then it wouldn't have sucked so much and been the only sucky game in the series. Nobody should blame Rocksteady for this, obviously they were forced to make this kind of game and it just didn't work, no wonder so many people left.

@@cenciende9401 Knight was one of the best in the series bud, what kind of crack have you been smoking?

​@@cenciende9401Every single game in the Arkham series, including both Origins and Knight, were peak Batman material. Tf you yappin' about dude?

its an embarrassment they should be ashamed

This also applies do DC as a whole.

That's hilarious. People said the same thing when knight came out because it was so much worse than city. 😅 Knight e en fired Paul dinni

they are both cash-grab , a fucking company job is to make money not art , the difference is the meta made by players , when you see a fortnite skin that took 3h to create make almost the same as entire game that took years to make you understand what fucked up the industry , like they say : don't blame the player , blame the game ' and companies are just players in this industry game , they follow the money , i mean when you see FIFA game thats a copy past every year made 5x times what elden ring made ( and it can make it every year ) what can you do

​​@@frogglen6350it wasn't, it was much better than city, city gets boring after completing story, and knight has more content bigger map more details than city

the co-founders of rocksteady did leave to create their own new studio called 100 star games. this was some months before suicide squad: kill rocksteady lol

Same thing has happened to every other good studio, it seems.

@@russian_pwn_u Lmao I wasn't aware, but that does explain a lot

theyre not dead lol they just got new jobs

I heard the original devs all left and got replaced by new ones. I don't know if it's true, but if it is, I wonder how and why

Yeah, literally. I laughed when he aimed at a car tire xD

I remember when crowbcat did that resident evil 4 video and it backfired so he started blocking and hiding comments. Total weakling

​@@frogglen6350Re4make sucked. Sorry your internet daddy didnt like it bro

In basically all ways, even down to deliberate cherrypicking. I mean, you don't need any effort to make Suicide Squad look worse than Arkham Knight, but I do find it weird how the last example is a barren and uninteresting road in SS and the single most destroyed and detailed road in AK. Likewise, AK suffers from occasional pop-in and stuttering, and I can't tell if SS does so too, because noone ever compares these aspects. I'm not saying that SS is better than AK, I'm not blind and stupid. But I can't shave off the feeling that some of these comparisons are kinfd of rigged in AK's favor

​@@imooumoo4Nah that game was good, if you don't like it then that's fine. Don't come at others for liking it.

As if Arkham knight wasn’t doing the same exact thing

it wasnt ahead of its time many games looked just as good in not better (ac unity, tf2, witcher 3, bf1) but then devs became lazy and started social experimenting to see how bad they could make their game before people stop buying them

Even ryse son of Rome looks better which came out 11 years ago

You’re exactly right. Arkham knight also had baked lighting aswell as only taking place at night. When the game showed daytime with Gordon it looked horrible because the poor texture work and saturation was highlighted. Fog,filters, road textures etc. ss also has day night cycle.

Graphical Fidelity

Wrong. Nobody should blame Rocksteady for this, obviously they were forced to make this kind of game and it just didn't work, no wonder so many people left. Something people with a clue know: the studios, unless they are self-published and self-owned, do not have as much power as you think.

The few fanboys who actually bought it like it. Nobody else bought it. It has 12 thousand played on launch. The original Counter Strike from 2000 has more than that daily. Haha

That’s just Aquaman down there😂

Aquaman is being controlled by Brainiac lol

THEY really do ruin everything they get their grubby hands on. Luckily recent world events have exposed them as the parasites that they are. ESG will fall when they do.

Esg?

@@giltyakhtar It's a essentially a scoring system for business if they align with global order standards set by the UN. These standards usually translates to the exclusion of white men, while putting trans, gays, whites *only* in interracial relationships, sexualizing children, demonizing white history etc. on a pedestal as the perfect standard. If you don't adhere to those standards then big investment companies like Blackrock and Vanguard will not want to have anything to do with your company because of its social credit score. These standards ofcourse have been pushed to the broad public through advertising, entertainment and other avenues for years no to the point where nobody recognizes it as abnormal. These standards are typically set by people hellbent on steering the world into a direction they see fit. These people are big names like Klaus Schwab, Bloomberg, Zuckerberg, Epstein, Rothschild's, George Soros, and oddly enough have very similar sounding names but I'm sure that's just an odd coincidence.

@@MaggotAddict21 Or you're simply not their audience. Make your own game, then?

If you hire a bunch of leftie loonatics this is the result.

now that guy was ahead of his time saying this in 1995

"Wirth's law is an adage on computer performance which states that software is getting slower more rapidly than hardware is becoming faster." Yes.

@@b.shes.2643 ye because the requirements are getting heavier and bloat the code. Also game devs basically never implemented any design principles/patterns, but rather let their code be a working mess

Arkham knight came out 8 years ago😂😂

Aquaman lol

Fortnite kids 😢

Any source to prove that, I'm genuinely curious to know.. or is this another one of those "trust me bro"?

@@anonymous_dot_com2326it is true that the majority of old rocksteady developers who worked on the Arkham series have left long time ago check google, but i don’t know about the replacement with wokes peoples.

true this is what modern gaming has become and this has to stop now man

They didn't dedica 7 years to develop the game. Which one is your source? They did more things beside SS.

@@mariano98ify the only other thing they worked on besides suicide squad was a unnamed shooter game that got canceled a couple years into development. They've been working on suicide squad since then.

They claimed this in the official suicide squad discord in a q&a and it was also confirmed by jason schreier a year back

Or you're just not the audience they're targeting.