GENERAL PURPOSE HYBRID APS-C CAMERAS Sony a6100 (Best budget mirrorless camera): $750 at SDP.io/a6100 Sony a6400 (Mid-range mirrorless): $900 at SDP.io/a6400 Sony a6600 (Sports & wildlife mirrorless): $1,400 at SDP.io/a6600 BEST FULL-FRAME TRAVEL MIRRORLESS CAMERA Sony a7C: $1,800 at SDP.io/a7C BEST PROFESSIONAL FULL-FRAME MIRRORLESS CAMERAS Sony a7 III: $2,000 at SDP.io/a73 Sony a7 IV: $2,500 at SDP.io/a74 BEST HIGH-RESOLUTION FULL-FRAME MIRRORLESS CAMERAS Sony a7R IV ($3,200): SDP.io/a7R4 Sony a7R V ($3,900): SDP.io/a7R5 BEST MIRRORLESS VIDEO CAMERAS Sony ZV-E10 ($700): SDP.io/ZVE10 Sony ZV-E1 ($2,200): SDP.io/ZVE1 BEST CINEMA CAMERAS Sony FX30 ($1,800): SDP.io/FX30 Sony FX3 ($3,900): SDP.io/FX3 BEST VIDEO-FIRST HYBRID CAMERA Sony a7S III ($3,500): SDP.io/a7S3
I had a long time ago Sony A900 and i loved it. Then i've decided to buy SLT - A99. Later i moved to mirrorless camera A7 Mark 1 (and from a-mount to e-mount). And month ago i bought ZV-E1. And it's absolutly great for RU-vid videos. I use 3 lenses: 1. Samyang 35-150 f/2-2.8 FE 2. Samyang 24mm f/2.8 FE and 3. Minolta 50mm f/1.7 with Adapter LA-EA5
Just over a year ago I changed from the Sony A7RII to the A7 IV. I lost a few pixels but gained better focus, menus and battery life. I have now used for Africa and Antarctica and love the upgrade.
After decades as a Pentaxian, I eventually switched to Fujifilm (X-T2, then X-T4) and, a few months back, a Sony A7C. I didn't plan to go with Sony but I found the A7C in classifieds for a ridiculously low price. I couldn't resist. I like the size and, with a compact or pancake lens, it would be perfect to do street of travel photography. In all honesty, I have been looking at a camera that would help me compensate for my shaking hands and failing eyesight. Then Sony came out with the A7IV and the A7RV. I went with the latter. I turn 69 in 2 weeks and I decided that I could make a few $acrifice$ and treat myself for this type of camera. I have 2 say that the A7RV is the best one for me so far! Really enjoying it, even though it may be too much camera for me.
You have a great setup....!! If you do not print big and pixel peep, you can also try a cheap used Olympus E-M1 Mark II or III with its 17mm f2.8 lens. The stabilisation is excellent for helping with shaky hands. I use a mark II myself and suggested the same to my Uncle, who is 72. He is very happy with the weight and stabilisation.
I have been a professional Pentaxian since the 80s (yes, we do exist), but have recently switched mostly to Sony. While I love the build quality, ergonomics, and UX of my Pentax gear (I kept a K-1 and a slew of lenses), the tech of the new Sonys, especially regarding autofocus, is just too awesome to pass up.
We must have followed a similar pattern because I have been a Pentaxian myself since the late 70's (Spotmatic F). I eventually sold my K-1 kit and switched to Fuji and now, to Sony. The Sony AF is too awesome to pass up. Totally in agreement with you.
@@speterlewis & thankfully Sony is actively listening to ppl, the recent a7RV tilt/selfie screen design is a great example, seems optimal to satisfy every type of user (vlogger/photographer etc...)
One of the great things about the a6600 is its size. Plus the apsc lens line up is great. Pair it with the highly rated 70-350 zoom and whatever Sony or third party lens to fill in the wide range (for example the tamron 17-70) and you have a compact kit for travel photos. We do some motorcycle travel and size matters-haha- small and mighty.
I think the most important piece of advice for beginners is to BUY USED! Due to the lower price, you can either save money on the same camera, or get a better camera for the same price. Especially if buying from B&H, KEH, Adorama, etc., there is very little risk associated as well.
I shoot A7r3 and might eventually replace with a7r5 but in no rush. Complex menus is a very minor issue. If you own the camera you find the settings you want and can store them on several one touch buttons. Tony’s comment on length of time to clear 100 shots is interesting. Talk about spray and pray!
I know you both use Sony and have a lot of experience with all cameras in general. But, the amount of time and effort that went into this video must be mindblowing. I don't shoot Sony. However, I do appreciate the work you put into this video. I feel there should be a second channel with behind the scenes videos. Great job!
Well, I was an early adopter and bought the Sony a7. That camera made me happy. Sony, however, did not like that and release the a7R, then a7II, then a7RII…. Anyway, I keep shooting and ignore the bliss costing more than six times as much. No regrets.😊
Before buying any of these cameras I would suggest depending on your budget check the used Market. For around $900 or $1,500 or even at the $3,000 price range you can get a much better product unless you have to buy brand new.
I don't really know why I watch your videos because you usually talk about expensive cameras and equipment. I like to keep it low budget. But your tips on general photography keep helping me continually raise the bar. Keep up the content!
I got the A7r ii still, upgraded to A7riv and just picked up the A1. All amazing cameras~ I do mostly stills but the flip screen really would make such a difference for the A1 JUST because of the price point but really happy with all the full frames.
I don't agree about your assessment of the flash on the a6xxx series, one of the reasons I have not upgraded my a6500 to the a6600 is them removing the flash (the buffer is smaller too). I use it more than you I think i would but it is a great little flash because of the mechanism use to store the flash allows you to use your finger and point the flash up and ceiling bounce it. In a pinch when you need to react fast it is a great little flash to keep that iso down indoors.
@@mirrorlessny The other body are the Sony A7RIVA which is 99.99% the same as the A7RIV, I like to have two Camera bodies that works in the same way. Lenses are many, most used are Sony 14mm 1.8 GM, Sony 24mm 1.4 GM, Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 35mm 2.0 Aspherical, Voigtländer Macro APO-Lanthar 65mm 2.0 Aspherical, Sony 135mm 1.8 GM, some times I also use the Sony Zeiss Sonnar 55mm 1.8, I have just sold my Sony 200-600mm 5.6-6.3 G Lens, so until I find out which Long Tele Lens to get, I use some of my analog Lenses, 300mm 5.6, 300mm 2.8, I have many very good analog Lenses.
@@mirrorlessny I do not like zoom Lenses, yes the Sony 200-600 are a bit heavy and big, it is very well built, it can be very sharp, but on the Sony R-series Cameras there are issues with the stabilizers in the Lens and Camera that do not always work well together, so even if you use a fast shutter speed and you have nailed the focus correct, then images often gets blurred. But it is as far as I know only an issue in the Sony R-series Cameras.
Nice overview, you two. One thing I recommend you include in your next review is the key difference in weight between APS-C and full frame systems. The APS_C bodies WITH their respective lens system are often smaller and lighter, and choosing a higher resolution sensor camera could put you on a par with some full-frame systems, something a landscape photographer hiking up mountains could appreciate.
Tony already has some fantastic content comparing sensor sizes. It would be nice to see a video that does a practical comparison of Sony's APS-C and FF systems based on the lenses available for each, and the use cases each are optimal for. Most photos and videos can be taken by APS-C size sensors just fine. It's at the extremes (widest angle, widest aperture, and/or lowest ISO) where FF truly makes a difference. FF also produces sharper results on average since LW/PH is higher for a larger image circle by default due to optical physics/economics.
I'm using a ZV-E10 although I know it was design for vlogging/video, I mostly use it for Photography... my reason for that is: - First, I have a bad eyesight that means I always wear a Eyeglasses. So not having a EVF is not a big deal for me. - Second, if we compare a6100 to ZV-E10. ZV-E10 has a latest firmware, better Auto Focus, updated color science. and I mean, seriously the only thing you would consider a a6100 is because of the EVF. but ZV-E10 is better on that price range..
I think you can't beat the A7iv (for hybrid) and FX30 (for video) for value for money. The A1 is the speed king, the A7Rv the high resolution king. The FX3 and A7Siii are best for video, whereby I personally prefer the A7Siii for the viewfinder and the shutter. I am less tempted by all the other models. The older A7Riii is now an absolute bargain, and I always loved the image output out of that camera for photography.
Another great video guys! I am still head over heels in love with my a7siii after 2 and a half years. I do wish that Sony would give us a firmware update with focus breathing comp and animal eye in video, but other than that, I feel like my camera is still one of the best in class for video, and I am STILL blown away by the footage I take. Best camera I ever owned by far! I primarily shoot video but it works really well for me as a hybrid, the photos I get are excellent quality especially when paired with my Sony glass. I do also have a cheeky Fuji XT4 which I adore for photo only shoots when I want to feel a bit old school, but my a7siii is my go to and my pride and joy. What I adore about Sony cameras is autofocus. rarely missing a shot is huge when you are low on time, light is changing or you are filming out in the real world you have no control over. And yes I agree the 9 million dot viewfinder is INSANE and that is why I would still pick the a7siii over the ZV-E1 or FX3 every time - I use it all the time when shooting outside and it's critical in sunshine and even more so in places like beaches where there is a lot of sun and ambient reflection. I don't think the viewfinder gets talked about enough! Can I just quickly mention HLG and HDR production - I got into this last year on my a7siii and now shoot all my real estate in HLG3 and its looks INSANE. I'm kinda shook that more people aren't producing HDR content online, as Dolby Vision video will automatically play in SDR if no HDR screen is detected it's a win win and RU-vid fully supports it you just upload one HDR file that's it! Anyway sorry went off piste it just looks SO GOOD! Love watching your videos because I am just so into camera gear and love geeking out with you, I feel part of the club I know that's sad 🤣
I am using an a6000 with a few lenses. It does great work with fast shutter speed, but low light it does struggle. Has a decent amount of noise. But with a tripod and a remote, I am able to take good star trail, and milky way shots. Luckily I have a proper flash. I do plan to get a full frame, just wasn't sure which one. I am on the fence with the a7iv and the a7Riii. I am doing portrait and landscape work, so I do plan to get 2 or three lenses for that body. I will keep the a6000 as a back up, just in case, and also to quickly switch to a lens for the situation.
Love from Mississauga, Ontario, Canada! Us entire family of 5, including a 7 year old, is Pentaxian. We have 4 Pentax cameras among us and Pentax lenses to cater to the interest of each of us. On your recommendation on another video, we bought a Canon EOS RP just to experiment with mirrorless world. Cameras are expensive. Lenses cost other extra dollars. We are border-line photography enthusiasts and have decided to use economical cameras and spend money on traveling and on photography instead. We think those Canadian $3000 and above cameras give diminishing returns.
Truly like the A7c; it’s appeal is really it’s size, but don’t most of the ff lenses pretty much defeat it’s purpose for travel? It seems like the APSC line a much better fit if you want something that can fit in a large pocket and want to be able to get outside (hiking etc). Total gear should be around 1kg or only a bit more in my view. Appreciated the overview!
Guys, great summary of the upper end of the market but what about the RX range? My daily is my RX100 VII, sure it’s a 1” sensor etc etc but it’s the camera I take almost everywhere because of its size and capabilities. There is also the RX10 IV, and before you choke on your coffee it’s a great camera for someone like my wife who enjoys photography but doesn’t want to become involved with multi lens cameras. Every photographer is different and Sony have some great entry level and casual amateur cameras for those who aren’t satisfied with smart phones, thank you Sony
Since i'm not shooting commercially anymore there is no point for me going Sony anymore. The last Sony's i owned were A7 III's and they served me very well. But i sold all of my gear and got a Fuji, added the X-H2 lately. It does everything for my private needs, can shoot 8k if i want, tho i stick to 4k downsampled from 8k. The funny thing is i dont miss my favorite glass i had on the Sony's - the Sigma 135mm 1.8. For the Fuji i grabbed the Viltrox 75mm 1.2 which gives me pretty much the same results. I'd go as far and would say even better than the big Sigma gun. i kept my Godox flashes, just switched the trigger (love that).
@@mirrorlessny if he finds it for $1000 then sure. if its closer to $2000 then the canon r6 is a better deal. the modern cameras have more fps and better autofocus.
Had a6400 and a7III, both great cameras. Then the Nikon Z5, poor autofocus once you get used to the Sony, but it takes great photos. I am now using a Canon R6II and currently the best I have ever used, it also has the best grip. Among the top aps-c cameras that I have used is the M50 mark II, very high-quality photos for little money, just buy ef-m 22mm f/2.
Such a great video. The best I've seen so far compare and explain the Sony Series. Love your Video! I have the A7c, totally happy with and fit to all of my needs. Everyone who wants to start in the Sony World should watch your video first. 😉 Thanks
I’m a professional using Nikon DSLR system and I’m looking at changing camera systems to Sony. I have no idea of these models so this was helpful thank you
I've owned a number of Sony cameras over the years, but my favorite one thus far is the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10IV. With a built-in 24-600mm equivalent lens that is sharp throughout the range, it's great for when you need to travel light. The RX10 line hasn't been updated for many years despite the rumors, but it's still great for so many shooting situations. Sony, if you're listening, I'm still looking for an RX10V.
I LOVED my RX10iv and I'm loving my a9. I am waiting for used a1 prices to get down to the $3500 range. That lens on the RX10 is insane, but the sensor really falls apart in low light.
Between my wife and me we have the Sony a6000, a1, a2. We love them all. I do mostly Astrophotography but also wildlife, and landscape photography. I also have Canon, Fujifilm , and Pentax cameras. I love photography. Great information on these new cameras. Thanks.
literally just bought an a7rii for under 1k shipped. from adorama even. great condition 21k shutter count. used can be good. feel like i got lucky with the shutter count.
Right now A7III is only $1698 at B&H and elsewhere, $300 off . The A7iii is STILL a highly relevant camera today and a bargain at this price point. Would I rather have an A7RV?, yes!, but the price excludes my budget. I own an A7iii and what I saved in purchase price has afforded me to purchase more lenses.
I'm still using the A7R2 and though I spend a lot of time looking at the R5 I spend even more being happy with what I'm getting from the R2. I'd recommend it still as it's a steal used. All the bells and whistles? No, not even dog eye, but it's a great entry point to get going, to build up your lenses, and to figure out what the next step will be and why.
Sony is quite a good system because it gives you plenty of options for different budgets. That is why I'm shooting using A9, which I was able to get (used) for 1999 Euro. Mechanical shutter in used camera doesn't matter as it is meant to be used with electronic shutter mainly ...
pawelmod, me to..i had a 7III first, but wanted more mgp and bought a used 7RIII... but no the AF a didt like and 42mgp was allright but no great combo with my 200-600 it felt strange, until I bought a used A9(2100 euro) I was sold...24mgp stacked/ the tracking/ 20 fps / and the electronic shutter its great...I do wildlife and planes///greets from the Netherlands
Just added a second A99ii to my first one. Most inexpensive and dependable Sony FF currently . 12 fps 42mpx 5 axis in body stabilization Dual slots Very good handling 399 ospdaf points Perfect fit for my photography
I started during the pandemic with shooting birds in flight. The Sony RX10IV was my first camera. It was great. Upgraded to the a6400 but it was too slow for action and I fortunately found a used Sony a9 for a 1700 Euro deal, with a 3 year warranty from Sony. I will never look back :-)
Thank you, amazing video. I still shoot with the A73, but I'm longing for some fresh air .. especially bc I got the new 70-200GMII. I'm eyeing the A7R5 now... but I hesitate because I know that in 2 years it might as well be outdated again...
I shoot my kids marching band performances with an a6600. I am constantly in high+ mode and hitting to buffer. I’d love to move up to the a1. I know that camera is way more than I need, but I’d rather have too much than too little. Honestly, the A7iv is probably more than I need with the unlimited buffer from the CF Express card.
@@idol031808 yeah 24 1.4 is probably the best optically corrected lens by sony. But I needed a bit more reach so I opted for 20mm. Also planning to buy 16-35gm ii when it will be released
You left out the RX100. ??? My grandkids are going to Europe and the RX100 VII is what I was thinking of getting them because of the built in zoom, no camera bag, stabilization, good auto focus and easy to shoot.
Great video which you don’t see elsewhere covering all current Sony lineup. Seeing this video of Sony lineup proved that Sony definitively know the current market of cameras and knows that this market is not solely defined by photography or Cinema as Canon does. There is vlogging, run and gun video.
Just started watching this but I have to say REALLY??? Where was this a week ago? I had my A6000 for 6 months and decided it was time to go up and I argued with myself for weeks over the A7 iii and the A7r iii. Adorama made my mind up for me. They put up a used 7r iii for a price I could NOT pass up and pulled the trigger. I have absolutely no regrets!!! Thank you though for this video. I know there are thousands out there like me having a hard time making the same decision.
I am a Sony still Photographer user (I never do video), I will recommend these Sony Cameras, if your are on a very tight budget, then the Sony 6100 or 6400, if you want a better Camera then Sony A6600. If you want the best overall, Sony Camera then the Sony A7RIIIA, Sony A7RIVA or Sony A7RV.
I shoot the A1 as most of my shooting is for BIF, but it works great with everything I point it at. It's by far the most productive camera I've ever owned, with amazing AF hit acquition times and amazing tracking. Would kill for the A7RV style flip screen to allow me to shoot more easily from a low-to-the-ground or above-my-head perspective in portrait aspect ratio. Other than that, it's been gold.
I'm a MFT user and thinking of getting an A7C for portraits and video. Would love to get the A7IV but it's quite a jump in price and I'd like to spend it on good glass. I also shoot wildlife and landscapes whenever possible.
Are there significant pros and cons between in body stabilization and stabilized lenses? referring to the fact that the a6600 is the only one of the 6000 series with in body stabilization.
I have brought a lot of my gear off your reviews and recommendations, so thank you for all your advice and in depth information. I brought Sony A7R iii after you reviewed it upon its release. I’m considering upgrading to Sony A7R V, but disappointed that to shoot 10 FPS, I would have to drop to Lossy instead of Uncompressed Raw. I note you mention 30 FPS a lot with your a1’s ( which is Lossy) are shooters losing much information shooting Sony Lossy vs uncompressed raw for wild life/Sports. My consideration for upgrading to Sony A7r V is for African Safari in September, where a1 is out of my budget, but 10 FPS is minimum I would want if upgrading. Thank you again for all your content
Got the a7 m2 for 600 bucks brand new on the used marked. It has its limitations but its more than good enough. Yes its old, but it still take beautiful pictures. the things that annoying is that sony could push out a new software update so it could get more features that i wish it had.
Nice summary of all the Sony cams in a relatively short video. I shoot with the A7iv and it's the best camera I've owned. I looked at the A7iii for a long time, but I didn't like the grip at all. Shooting with a D750 for a long time got me spoiled with Nikon's great grips, so I waited until Sony got the message. The A7iv is so much easier in the hand, it's the best option for me as an enthusiast.
Very good video, as usual 👍. I had the Canon 50D and 7D. Then I switched more to video, smartphone entry level, gained a lot of knowlege and switched to the Sony ZV-1.But because filmmaking is my passion now I bought an A7IV and love it so far. The hybrid possibilities are awesome. From my point of view the most versatile camera at the moment 😍🤩 especially with the sigma 16-28mm also for content creation. Also made a video about this lense on the A7IV on my YT channel 😎
Hey I read you had a canon I currently have a canon 80D looking to upgrade but I’m stuck between 3 cameras the Sony A7iii , Sony A7IV and Sony A7Siii I love taking videos and photos and I’m looking to get a camera where I won’t need to upgrade for a while any suggestions? I’m looking forward to take it at a families wedding and film the party and take photos I got two months to get use to the Sony camera appreciate any advice
Great video, and my advice is to buy used as you can get some very good bargin. Mist of my camera gear is used and you look after it well it will out last you !
Sorry folks I still like my R5 for birds and wildlife. Less expensive than both the A1 or A9ll and the results are fantastic. Using the RF100-500 (agreed not cheap). Thanks for the Sony look.
cant get wrong with any brand at this age. however. The rf lenses cost like a bomb. They are very big and heavy too. If you’re happy using it then why not. They are all good.
I shoot youtube videos with A7III and its more or less getting the job done. I want to know if its worth upgrading to zv1 that sony just announced. Is in body 10 bit footage worth it? I saw your zv1 review and loved tony's faux skater moves while showing the follow feature on zv1.
As a hobby photo and video maker I was using a6000 - it's still available in the shops and is a cheapest option for beginners - then a6300, a6600 and A7III. Today I use a pair of a6600 and A7III - they have matching colors (helps combining footage shot from 2 angles), and they share the same long lasting batteries and seem to never overheat. Both of them are pretty sweet for wildlife photography, and a6600 also serves as a teleconverter with it's x1,5 crop, although evf lag and lack of animal eye autofocus and overall poor autofocus performance in video sometimes trouble me. I think all of these cameras I've used have some poor image stabilization, if any - using them for video without gimbal or tripod is, I'd say, impossible. I prefer GoPro with its perfect out of the box stabilization for "on the go" video shooting. Overall I like these cameras, and feel no urge to upgrade the bodies any time soon. Sony release new cameras several times a year and give them better and better features each time, but lenses seem to never get old, so I prefer investing in better glass nowadays.
I have always liked high-megapixel cameras. Recently I started switching from Nikon to Sony because, after years of waiting for them, they really don't have anything exciting for me to upgrade from my pair of D810. I purchase an A7R5 and I can tell is a camera that I will keep for many years to come, my Nikons have been with me for 8 years and I still like them but my needs have increased. Now I'm learning video with the Sony and it seems that I would need a video camera and I'm debating between the FX30 and the FX3 mostly because of price, but I believe that in the end, the FX3 will be cheaper if I don't have to purchase two types of lenses as I would be if I have a full frame and a crop sensor camera at the same time.
Thanks so much for the best video ever it is very helpful till now and I am a beginner at photography I really love photography and I want to work as a Photographer and I choose to go with a Sony a6400 and 18-135mm lens I don't know which lens to buy next, I shoot mostly bportraits and travel photography I appreciate it and if anyone can help me out with choosing another lens will be great to me ❤❤
I love this video! It has really helped break down camera choices for us as we are upgrading in the near future from the Nikon D3100. Would the A7 IV have enough resolution to get crisp photos for larger prints…11x14 and up?
I have a6400 and I wish Sony will add a new firmware for it something like a bird eye AF and vertical object framing over video would be nice too 😆 But for now I think I have to be gratefull for it's AF speed and accuracy 😅
Ironically, the pixel shift image comparison of the A7R IV vs A7R V actually favors the older body. They didn't use the section of the image with all the motion artifacts in the A7R IV.
I’m finally ready to upgrade from my canon 70d and make the jump to mirrorless. It’s too difficult traveling with that DSLR can someone recommend a mirrorless that excels in both photo and video that you can get under 2000 with a decent lens?
I have the A1 and shoot mainly wildlife. I am trying to find a video on how to shoot wildlife action video with the sony A1. There are many setup for stills but very few on A1 video. Thanks for all your great work!
Any suggestions for a camera for an artist needing to take high quality photos of their artwork (especially paintings)? Possibly for use in creating very high quality prints.
