The discussion between the parties in the court hearing involves the disagreement over the parenting plan presented by the Guardian at Litem. There was a new amended plan that some were not aware of, leading to confusion and disagreements. The parties discussed summer parenting time and visitation schedules for the child, with one party requesting supervised visitation. There were also concerns raised about arrest records of one party, which will be addressed in a separate full hearing. The court requested clarification on specific disagreements with the plan to better understand the issues at hand.
The conversation is about an ammended guardian ad litem item report written report, with three versions, one in March of 23, one in November of 23, and the most recent one from yesterday. Miss Marshall mentioned not having the report, but the speaker can send it quickly via email. The report is crucial due to Mom`s child safety concerns, Mom requests time to consult legal counsel. London Bouvier also mentions putting information about Mr. Habib's arrest records into the case file. There is disagreement about the report, with the speaker stating they disagree with the entire thing and wanting the child to have contact with Habib. The conversation also mentions supervised visitation for the child.
The judge is reviewing a case involving allegations of drug use, home invasion, police chase, and marijuana cultivation by Mr. Habib, who has a history of criminal activity while living with his child's mother. The judge wants to review all reports before making a decision and suggests supervised visits for the father at the grandmother's house to rebuild the relationship with his child. The mother and father agree to this arrangement. The judge plans to revisit the case next month after further review of the reports.
The updated report discussed is the third written report, following previous reports in March and November of the same year. The report is related to a family court case involving child custody and visitation rights. The conversation also touched upon the need for legal counsel in the matter due to the seriousness of the issues at hand, particularly regarding the safety of the child involved. There were discussions about the parenting plan presented by the Guardian at Litem, and disagreements regarding the plan between the parties involved. Concerns were raised about the criminal history and drug use of one of the parents, leading to the need for a thorough review of the reports before proceeding with a hearing. As a temporary solution, supervised visitation was agreed upon at the grandmother's house to allow the parent to rebuild a relationship with the child.
In the next hearing:
• Mom Denying Dad Visita...
Mom Denying Dad Visitation Sent to Jail for 10 Days | Sheriff Sent to Arrest Mom
The speaker, who is the judge for Division 10, is conducting a civil contempt hearing with three matters on the calendar. The judge mentions reviewing recommendations and reports from the last hearing, but it is unclear how far they got in the process. Miss Bouvier is reminded to turn on his video for the ongoing hearing. The hearing may involves a custody or visitation dispute, with the mother potentially denying the father visitation rights.
Mom is representing the descendant in a legal matter and has not waived any rights. They have requested a jury trial and filed an amended notice of recusal. They have also cited relevant Georgia Code sections and asserted their right to a jury trial. The individual has presented all necessary documents to the court and excuses themselves from the proceeding. The court reminds them to turn their video back on and addresses their motion for recusal, which was denied due to lack of evidence. The court also notes that a custody matter cannot have a trial by jury. The individual's amended motion for recusal was not received by the court and will be denied for the same reasons as the original motion. The court stresses the importance of following proper procedures for filing motions.
In court, the judge is addressing someone named London Bouvier and emphasizing that they will be held accountable under the law as their representative. The judge emphasizes that if London Bouvier does not comply with the court's instructions, it will be London Bouvier who faces consequences, not any other representative they may claim to be. The judge encourages participation in the proceedings to ensure that London Bouvier's concerns are heard and addressed.
@courtwatchers
#court
#comedyvideo
#trending
#comedy
#viralshorts
#childsupport
#video
#viral
#familylaw #familycourt #court #livecourt #law #court #storytime #lawandcrime #childsupport #zoomcourt #courtcam #familycourt #courtdrama #crime #childbenefit #news #childmaintenance #zoomcourt
#judgesimpson #courtroomdrama #courtdrama
20 июн 2024
