Why Apple Killed a $3 Billion Investment 

Futurama "eye phone" ftw

and then you will get LED Type C-2.0 which will be actually downgrade back to normal LED (just different packaging)

But are we talking about type c 2.0 or 3.2

😂

@@fekett you mean usb 3.2 gen 1x2, 2x1 or 2x2

Yeah poor editing

@@_Super_Hans_ Don't blame creators for cutting corners on a dying platform that Google refuses to fix?

@@AutismoGamerdying platform? It's only the most popular video hosting website in the world, with 2.4 billion monthly active users.

RU-vid dying 😂​@@AutismoGamer

thats because your mind goes straight to complaining, thats not a good thing

I think they went a little too far. I didn’t realize there was any background music until I read this and turned the volume up pretty loud.

@@Mineman268I didn’t notice the background music either, but I massively prefer it without background music, makes it much easier for me, personally, to concentrate on what the presenter is saying.

@@Mineman268 just shows its pointless to have it and annoying once you can hear it.

I never really noticed the background music but I noticed speech was way clearer than usual. Much prefer not having any background music

Yeah this is much nicer

I just hope it doesn't go down a patent rabbit hole

Let’s not forget how convoluted was the story of OLED. Took an incredibly long time to get it where it is.

The holy grail of screen tech.

Microled is probably never happening except for the very largest screens. Self-emissive quantum dot displays will be mass produced faster and be a much more natural eveloution of oled for small displays. at that point there would be no point in investing in microled.

Begone bot

nah it'll just take more time than expected.

@@Xfade81 it's basically abandoned. much more investment is going into self-emissive quantum dots. microled might go the way of FED and SEd displays that were reseached and ultimately abandoned in favor of oled. sometmes a better option emerges first.

Apple ditched, but they buy their displays from Samsung anyway so it doesn't matter.

Yes that was the issue with the manufacturing

The yields were awful

Was looking for that comment! Thank god im not alone 😂👌🏼

They do use a particular gradient for the background and the font seems very reminiscent as well! 🥹

i dont think u can prevent organic materials degrading :/

And eye tracking-induced motion blur. LCDs still can be better because you can strobe the backlight.

@@Hanfos Which is why I buy LCDs. When I buy a screen, I expect to still use it in 14 years. In fact, I have an LCD from 14 years ago that currently serves as my nephew's monitor.

@@eldibs My monitor is going strong after 10 years while my Galaxy S7 was burned in after 2 years or even after 1 year.

Literally can’t. The O in OLED is Organic. You can put in every protection possible like Pixel Shift, Auto Dim, heat sinks to dissipate heat, MLA to boost brightness without increasing power, etc but every moment you run current through an OLED pixel, you’re shortening its lifespan. All of those mitigate the problem and extend its life but doesn’t stop burn in from eventually happening. It’s an organic material and use degrades it. They’ve gotten really, really good at burn in prevention for TVs and varied content. But PC monitors have to deal with static elements like icons or taskbars

You don’t for most products other than maybe monitors I think

​@@anshulshah1703 it will happen anywhere where u have static images and faster when high screen brightness its just a matter of time and unbalanced usage on desktop its often the game hud or 16:9 ratio when 21:9 monitor from videos on smartphones its often the status bar and navigation bar on handhelds like steam deck and nintendo switch also the game hud on tv also the game hud and if watching the same channel all the time the logo of it burn-in is just pixel degradation of pixels which got more used than the others so they aged faster so when u have some pixels which always have to glow bright white they ofc will age faster and when u watch non stop 16:9 content on a non 16:9 screen the the borders on the left and right side with degrade much slower than all others cuz they are always turned off i know its not oled but had hardcore burn-in on my plasma tv back when i bought destiny 1 ps4 bundle played the game non stop for 2 weeks and then i had burn in my ammunition indicator for years in it on bottom left XD

NanoLED bruh

Nanomachines, son​@@TheMarkJoergensen

​@@anshulshah1703burn in occurs on literally everything with an oled, i have burn in on my phone rn

Art directors mainly I think

Squidward: Fuutuuure, fuutuuure, fuutuuure.

Especially ones that have the characters waving their arms all over the place. That trop should've been put to bed after motion controls failed to revolutionize gaming.

I don't think its done for, but QLED is a good stepping stone. I understand Samsung is incorporating micro LED into their backlights, so they're probably eventually gonna switch when they work things out.

Haha, me too, it works out though because I don't really need a new TV right now.

Not everyone will know Arch when they see it, so you'll have to keep on telling them.

@@DavidCowie2022 most people won't know what arch is unless you are at a convention or something with people likely to use Linux.

It uses micro oled, which is oled on a silicon wafer.

@@mcmadness110 that's... what micrOLED is.

@@willfancher9775 micro oled and micro led aren't the same

@@willfancher9775No, Micro OLED and Micro LED are different.

It did

Inflation...😂

Also explains why Vision Pro is expensive, each Micro LED cost Apple $1000 to make.

That would be crazy to see, but the bandwidth requirements would be INSANE. over a BILLION pixels for just a 1080 cube.

@@Soandnb agreed also the COST of them that be nightmare fuel

my point exactly!! The companies obviously care about the failure rate during manufacturing, not after 2 years after the warrants expires

You get a good picture which lasts long, or a great picture which doesn't last long. It's a trade off, not everything can be perfect

Exactly what I was thinking one minute into the video 😤

​@@keppycsthat just means we havent advanced enough

@@keppycs then there's this 100 year old tech just lurking around called CRTs that didn't have these problems. It had other problems, but longevity wasn't one of them.

It's almost like they picked them out for the job

Huuh? It does not? well I always thought it used microOLED as I think apple said it themselves and now, after searching the web, it says that Vision Pro indeed uses MicroOLED Technology. Is there something I'm missing?

The Vision Pro uses micro-OLED, not microLED. They are not the same.​@@zabaxa1008

​@@zabaxa1008It was microOLED, missed the O there

@@aravindpallippara1577 😄😄guess I was missing O the whole time😂. Great coincidence, thanks for the correction

@@zabaxa1008 that O haunted me. I was so sure they announced microLED.

nah we've got Micro-OLED for that

@@smallbutdeadly931 as well. Both are technologies great for VR. Really depends on what lens array you're using which one would be a better choice.

When making the monocristalls needed for wafers you often spin them during the formation which leads to a cylindrical form. These cylinders are then cut into thin wafer that are round

​@@yonko5220 This is correct. And cutting round dies out of a round wafer would actually be hugely inefficient if you think about it. Tons of unused space in-between. Not to mention that it would be unnecessary difficult to cut.