The unbiblical idea that Noah cursed Ham, and thereby all of Ham’s descendants, was used to justify the African slave trade, and is still used by some today to justify racism, prejudice, and discrimination against people of color. Let it be clearly said. Noah did not curse Ham. Noah did not curse all of Ham’s descendants. Rather, Noah only cursed Canaan, one of Ham’s sons, and through Canaan, all of Canaan’s descendants. Why and to what end? Please continue reading. What is abundantly clear, however, is that this account in Genesis 9 regarding Noah, Ham, and Canaan does not, in any way, support slavery or racism in any form.
Genesis 9 records the story of Noah getting drunk, being found naked in his tent, and then cursing Canaan. In this video we answer your question: Why did Noah curse Canaan instead of Ham?
Source: www.gotquestio...
*** Check out, Bible Munch!
@BibleMunch
/ biblemunch
*** Recent Bible Munch Videos:
James 1:2-4 - How to Face Trials in Life & Find Joy
• How to Face Trials in ...
John 4:24 - Is there a wrong way to worship?
• Is there a wrong way t...
Philippians 4:13 - What this misused verse really means.
• Philippians 4:13 - The...
*** Recommended Resource:
The Genesis Flood: The Biblical Record and Its Scientific Implications, 50th Anniversary Edition
By: John C. Whitcomb, Henry M. Morris
bit.ly/42kZwsO
*** Related Questions:
Why did Noah get drunk after the flood?
www.gotquestio...
What does it mean to uncover nakedness in the Bible?
www.gotquestio...
Who were the sons of Noah, and what happened to them and their descendants?
www.gotquestio...
Intro/Outro Music: www.purple-pla...
Note: Some links may be affiliate links that cost you nothing, but help us share the word of God.
23 апр 2023