Why Didn't America Become a Socialist Country? 

Dammit right winger why cant we have good life

You can combine all the leftist channels and you won’t even come close to the subscribers and views that Steven crowder has 😂😅

@@Rommie26 There is more than you think

@@sterlingmorse5409 not even close I’m centrist so I’m subscribed to many channel from the right and left It’s not even close

We will win...eventually. However, it is to be seen whether or not we win in time.

This is exactly what Thorstein Veblen said in his books, particularly in "The Theory of the Leisure Class".

PSA - Join a union! It barely costs anything, and it'll help everyone!

Dude... That is just like the best comment I have seen in a while

@BorisH I totally believe you, random internet person with a totally believable anecdote. I am very convinced.

@BorisH Justice isn't Justice unless it is for everyone. I don't want to be rich. I want everyone to be rich. I want happiness for everyone.

yup this was a thing

Dont forget the time the government massacred a commune of people because they had guns and lived off on their own

What the fuck!?

They also juuuuuuuuuust happened to have killed a bunch of people, including cops, Blown a bunch of stuff up, and launched full scale assaults on mines for the "crime" of hiring people who didn't join the union.... but usre, let's pretend they got shot for "trying to unionise."

Can I get a source on that?

@Tej the irony is you believing that you are living in a country free of propaganda and intellectual repression

@Tej Im no expert, but I think those are different words..

Top reason is that the worker class became prosperous. It’s hard to get riled up for a socialist revolution when you have a job, house, car, you take family vacations in Florida.

@Justin Bradburn The profit motive, which these people detest, is bound in 2nd law of thermodynamics. Any living being must consume more calories than they expend in gathering it, aka profit. Human civilizations rose once there were enough agricultural surplus to afford specialization... more profit. And every step of the way towards human development, this process, this quest for profit from nature, has advanced. And now we have these idiots come along and tell us the whole thing is wrong... that they have a non thermodynamic type model that is better Then, of course, look at their track record of entropy wreckage and rot

@babykuzi82 Ey there, I am actually very knowledgeable on Vietnam's situation. I wouldn't call it a socialist government after Ho Chi Minh died, more of a state-capitalist mix, and yea the government there is corrupt. I agree on your taxation. As for the larger federal government for the US, not going to sugarcoat it but we actually do not have a big government. We barely spend on welfare contrary to popular belief. Setting a national healthcare system will not cause a USSR style party member elite, it will in fact aid our doctors and increase them per capita, as in any other nation who has done such policies. As a Libertarian Socialist I am not really a big fan of Marxist-Leninist policies (which is a very broad definition mind you) , such as the USSR, and post-Ho Chi Minh Vietnam.

And if it does a real lot of stuff, it's communism!

@@zed6740 *ROBOT ROCK INTENSIFIES*

And to those who are afraid of government doing stuff: Problem?

are you guys stupid? governments are literal cancer leeching off people, you work hard and they tax your ass, print money, cause inflation etc all those things that make you poorer. if there was no government everybody would be better off

@@sten260 You need a government under capitalism to enforce private property rights. The only way to have a stateless society is by having a worker owned socialist economy.

Honestly I'm not sure most people on the right could tell you the difference between communism and liberalism

PSA - Join a union! It barely costs anything, and it'll help everyone!

@@imhappy5266 or addition and subtraction for that matter

@harlaudata Oh you mean capitalism that can not even work on paper in an ideal world. Yeah the left is bad for calling it what it is.

@harlaudata you're right I'm not an economist you're wrong about one thing I have enough empathy to realize that we have one in four children going hungry at night in the usa and that is a problem. Yes capitalism isn't "evil", but to be a good CO it requires that you become a psychopath, and highly narcissistic

Gave me a chill down my arms. We can always change, always improve.

Very nice words with context, but it remembers me of people denying white privilege

True.

Thank goodness because destiny is a liberal that thinks Palestinians are all terrorists ;)

PSA - Join a union! It barely costs anything, and it'll help everyone!

Bernie killed rosa

@@KcarlMarXs ye I know lol

rosa was a queen

@Irked Imperial meanie

Freikorps voran!

Makes sense. It went to Asia. Now it's in Africa I hear.

Yes. By both bourgeois liberal parties

@@vladimirlenin3562 Holy shit that's V.I. Lenin!!!!! Big fan! Please 🙏 give me ur autograph 😉😁

@@someesingh2827 ikr it is me

Thank god we are so blessed as to have no commies.

palmer sends his regards

+1 uwu

+1 ^

Wake the fuck up samurai, we have a gravel institute video to watch

Congrats yurafag!

Just need a few hundreds of deaths (Mostly news reporters and politicians) and we we'll get there Long live the socialist revolution

@@tamirj.b.n9814 no matter which human beeing you give such power - hes going to become corrupt - not because hes weak, but a human beeing is just not made for this much power. imho anarchy is the only way to reduce centralized power and put the power into the hands of the community.

@@rodabanane giving power to the community isn't always good There needs to be a leader and if any Joe could just be nice to someone to convince the community to do something stupid, then what's the point

@@tamirj.b.n9814 i guess you unfortunately didnt get my point, so again: a human ALWAYS gets corrupt with this much power. in the majority of human time there have been "leaders", sending their "slaves" into wars which often were driven by their own interest. capitalism is no exception. these system will always allow people to expploit others. this needs to stop.

@@rodabanane yes but I don't think the answer needs to be that radical

but it's constantly repeating so it becomes destiny. lol

@@suspicious2delicious Nah, it is as Mark Twain described: “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.”

@@joshualittlewolfe8550 That's just a play on words.

@@suspicious2delicious Not at all bro. It means that current developments may appear similar to historical events, but are never an exact 1:1 equivalent or copy. As you know, one letter at the front of a word can completely change it’s meaning and the consequences of its expression.

@@joshualittlewolfe8550 So you're saying there's never been an event that was ever exact? lol

PSA - Join a union! It barely costs anything, and it'll help everyone!

Donate to their Patreon if you can. They don’t take billionaire money.

Same it is a great channel ^^

ru-vid.com/show-UCOInEMAm0Y4VXoAfbJMR3Wg

ru-vid.com

It won't, for mysterious reasons...

Absolutely no chance. This carcass promotes where the money flows, so it will do them well to delist Gravel and other left outlets. Just another reason why socialism is based, wouldn't you love to have a public RU-vid funded by everyone?

@@eldizo_ Yes, I would. I'd love to be able to use and support an Internet not of companies, but of people.

I keep getting them in my recommendations after a new video comes out.

I can't even ring the bell, like RU-vid disabled it on this channel..

Send this to your friends and we can get there!

Pfft..if you break even with them they're outperforming massively. Manipulated...try on a free speech platform and see

@@mostlyfoldersabitofeveryth1989 free speech platforms? You mean the type that bans liberals? Lmao

@@allenwilliams7367 if that's the case I'm not in favor of that. I haven't seen it, but I will admit it would not surprise me if there are some platforms that are right leaning and do ban or throttle the other side. And if so that's problematic, but it doesn't make it not problematic that trillion dollar corporations are doing it just because it favors your views

@@mostlyfoldersabitofeveryth1989 SOMEONE OTHER THAN ME WINNING??? MUST BE FAKE??? WAAAAAAA

it's crazy how democrats are seen as leftist to americans, but far right to europeans

即使是中国，在我们的课本中，我们现在使用的也是中国特色社会主义，从1978年开始，共产主义被描述为无限遥远的理想状态。事实上是中国人在几十年的实践中认识到社会主义是真正符合人性和客观规律的生产模式。我们真的吸取了前苏联和中国文化大革命时期的教训。

Exactly, citing your sources is what differentiates the educators from the grifters.

Boosting this excellent point.

They’ve put citations in all their other vids idk why they’re not here

It’s 90% opinion in this video there isn’t much to link to

indeed

Exactly, the left has been brutally suppressed in the United States, often with violent force. This, more than anything else, is what has made it so hard for them to build even a basic foothold.

Bingo!

@@TheGravelInstitute Social democracy & Nordic model aren't really "socialism" though, it's more like social fascism Scandinavia maintained their wealth inequality & their class hierarchy & their monarchies... doesn't really sound revolutionary iyam

@@wtfhah Yep, that's stupid. USSR had a hierarchy - of party bureaucrats. China has a hierarchy. Any dictatorship has a hierarchy. Also, another facet of this ludicrous idea of "social fascism" is pontential to fall in to fascism - real fascism. newsflash. Anything can fall to fascism. It's a cancer.

@@JukeboxTheGhoul No, USSR had a much more flourishing democracy than USA ever had. China also has a more responsive & better functioning democracy than the US. Notice there was no storming of the capitol that took place in USSR or PRC. You are living under "dictatorship of the bourgeoisie". And it's only the "DotP" that can prevent this Fascism is far more likely to result from liberalism & capitalism

@John Spöner you’re missing the point, the quote is about how lots of US people see themselves as future millionaires and so vote for policies that benefit them instead of the average man or woman.

@@dominictemple they say in capitalism man exploits man well in socialism it’s vice versa

@@westg463 funny, but it is a shame that criticism of capitalism was for decades of the 20th Century very closely linked to murderous totalitarians who were more interested in ideological excuses to rule out kill than anything else.

@@dominictemple and it’s funny how people blame capitalism for what’s happening now it’s not capitalism it’s GOVERNMENT filled with incompetent people

Historically Socialists have always been very fun! I am young and I love it! Join us watch this video! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-y2pxMM1He9A.html

Same, let's make this happen.

Yupp that’s what I’m here for too.

Yeet

Sacrifice for the algorithm

Amen brother

And even Chile is slowly changing its ways.

@@bogdangiusca7431 They completely rejected neoliberlaism and are now rewriting the constitution. Unless this is forced down peoples throats through US backed coups or almost religious rhetoric, they opt for the social democratic way.

You just named imperialist countries, literally the antithesis of socialism. 🤦‍♂️

@@yuh1592 Taiwan and South Korea, the most imperialist of all countries. Nevertheless, even if in the past they had empires, like every other nation, now they are liberal democratic states.

@@ctrlaltdelmeir184 What are you talking about? Japan is imperialist today. South Korea isn’t even a legit country; it’s a U.S. puppet state established by the U.S. government. The DPRK is the rightful government of the entire Korean Peninsula.

I know the feels. As you learn more about how flawed our system is, it soon just becomes depressing tbh.

Not just the country. The world. Capitalism is everywhere, some systems are just slightly better than others. Cops still beat people to death in England.

@@funnylittlecreature Yea but the US is what I feel to be the worst. Many countries adopt some leftists policies like free healthcare or free education and the working class at least have a safety net above them. But in the US, anything even remotely close to the left instantly screams socialism to Americans

@@zed6740 Of course! What I’m saying is that we should hold other countries accountable too, lest we become like neoliberals or tankies.

@@funnylittlecreature Yea totally agree with you man! I think it would be best if we take both positives and negatives into account so that we can to a more reasonable conclusion on how to better overcome the challenges in our country.

"Fascism" ok bud

@@connorschrock2883 Yes. A bureaucracy that serves to give endless incentives to corporatists be it from the liberals to right wing “populists” is fascism

Utterly hilarious. You simpletons throw around the word fascism like confetti. Anyone right of Trotsky is a fascist to you.

@@harrymail7 true and based. anyone right of trotsky is a fascist

@@harrymail7 the modern republican party is openly fascist, as is anyone who supports then blindly like Prager u and company.

I knew it was a good idea to look up to you, Dodge

And this especially accounts to the elected progressive politicians that were funded by regular people to fight for policies that benefit regular people.

“The harsh realities we live in” Have you studied human history or traveled the world? 2020 western society seems to be anything but a “harsh reality.”

@@jb8408 I have, in fact, but have you considered that US politics affects people *outside* of the US, and that the premise of a harsh reality applies to other countries, including US client states? I see your argument, but there’s not much to it.

@@Official_Doge well, I’m sure your political ideas will bring the global utopia you desire 👍

Lots of them are already convinced, they're just confused about branding. The original People's Party was formed by a bunch of farmers.

The farmers are convinced, they just don't realize it. Farmer's co-ops, barn raising, government Farm Subsidies, price support for crops, being paid for not growing, and Welfare money is provided in amounts per capita comparable to big cities.

Build HSR and say hay wanna get to a nice city in 30 minutes flat?

Embracing capitalism doesn’t make it harder on yourself. Capitalism is better than socialism.

​@@grunklesmuffreally? Stay at the starting point if you want, but at this stage it's not even worth debating that, it's just a nuisance.

@@josecipriano3048 Capitalism, while flawed, is, in my opinion, better than socialism. Of course, both hare deep problems and my preferred economic model is a mixed system-the Nordic social democratic model is a good example.

Socialist is NOT the answer the USA will never be socialist

No

@@Steve-zc9ht sorry we are already socialist lol

Yes we need more socialism to fightback the socialism that isn't working now and then we can put more socialism in

@@Steve-zc9ht Neither is the Fascism both major parties have in mind.

Hm? I didn't know big green mad man thought socialism is based.

@@ARandomSpace Me neither

Pedro Pascal (The Mandalorian) is also a good one. He's actually distantly related to Allende, the Chilean president killed by the US-backed coup that put Pinochet in power in 9/11/1973

@@Sam_Hetfield what is the relationship between them? Some uncle grandpa cousin stuff?

@@1homelander179 Directly from Wikipedia: "His mother was the cousin of Andrés Pascal Allende (President Allende's nephew through his sister Laura), the leader of the Movement of the Revolutionary Left, an urban guerrilla movement dedicated to Pinochet's overthrow."

That explains the Covid19 failure

UwU

lol

Agreed.

Praise be!

@jvpiter thanks for the algorithm fact!

He PuT DoWN A SLavE ReBElLiOn

ThE GovERnmEnT Is NOt MEAnT tO ImPrOVE SoCiEtY

UwU

Good. Capitalism must fall.

@Ryan Alex college gives knowledge, intelligence must be developed through life experiences

Good points

this is a very good point tbh. I'm Singaporean and you just helped me realise that a lot of the "socialist" and "communist" policies that sg is famous for are themselves a direct response to having to build up the nation after WWII/colonisation/independence

Okay, your country lacked misery for you to be better than Latin countries, I could talk about that, but if your capital hadn't worked out right, my brothers wouldn't be dying to pass your border, things are very socialist around here. (I AM ASSUMING THAT THE AMERICAN SEA, OR ANY OTHER TYPE)

Yeah WWII catapulted the US to being the worlds economic super power because we didn't have to fight in the war until the very end out of self interest and therefore didn't feel any of the devastation that other countries did. (The only places attacked were territories that we didn't want to hassle of defending anyways, except Alaska and maybe Hawaii cause they could be used to invade the mainland.) The US got rich off selling supplies to the rest of the world while they fought and were devastated. Then the US demanded that the industries of all other countries retool to the US set standards (sizes for nuts and bolts, screw threads, standard measurements, plane parts, language, etc.) which further held back and costed all other countries while the US gained more monopolistic control. This further entrenched US control over the territories (even if they got their independence) because we threatened to cut off aid and trade if they didn't do/elect who we wanted and in places like the Philippines that had been devastated repeatedly by the Spanish, then us, then the Japanese, then us again, were utterly reliant on the US because of our foreign policy (and killing them all). This also happened in Europe to places like Greece. We essentially held them politically captive and threatened to starve their children en masse if they didn't cooperate.

People who criticize communism always overlook the fact that communist countries came from absolutely nothing. While the US came from untouched fast resources and land and the original immigrants after the pilgrims were exceptionally wealthy Europeans, the US had any Normas Headstart on any other societies that ever existed before and after its founding.

Yes

Yes

yes

Yes

Ya

And along racial lines

The problem with that idea is that Canada, which is just as suburban a nation as America (if not moreso) has a fairly robust socialist party (the New Democratic Party, which has real political power at the provincial level, winning many elections, and forming the official opposition much of the time they're not in power*). Moreover, Canadians enjoy a lot of the social programs that Americans keep rejecting, including universal health care, paid family/maternal leave, as well as mandatory paid vacation days. And even amongst most conservative Canadians, there really isn't a push to get rid of these social programs. Most people realize that nearly EVERYONE is better off with them than without them. And while rich people do hold disproportionate political power here (as is the case pretty much everywhere), the situation isn't nearly as dire as it is in the USA. You are limited in how much you can donate to a party or politician, and (so far) our courts have not equated money with speech (a la Citizens United). No, I think racism has a lot more to do with why the US has rejected socialism. Back when socialism was gaining a foothold in Europe (and Canada), America was a deeply segregated, racist society. White people would've gladly embraced socialism...if it was socialism by white people, FOR white people. The fact that it would help EVERYONE was the reason it never took off (and IS the reason it is still not so popular today). *Even where I live, in Manitoba (which is a moderately conservative place, by Canadian standards), the New Democratic Party held power for 17 consecutive years recently (1999-2016) winning 4 consecutive elections, gaining 44-49% of the vote each time (with 3 major parties, it usually only takes around 40% of the popular vote to win an election here). And if they had strong leadership, I think they could easily win again next time (weak leadership lost them the 2016 AND 2019 elections - I think they would've stood a chance both times with a better leader).

@@VoIcanoman You made a key point I wish the video would've also addressed, as to why socialism or any left party or even left policy failed to pass.

It doesn’t make sense given unions exist in the US and the people without transportation to unionize are located in the cities where the jobs are located

So u wanna live among bumbs and criminals?

The US has had a lot of immigration in the 19th century it wasn’t just the Chinese, blacks, Irish, Catholics, Chinese, immigration upset people as the immigrants took people’s jobs away because they were either underpaid as they easily replaced regular workers creating anti-immigrant sentiments

That anti-China hate is still thriving today, being drummed up by the US gov.

i'm an american anarchist. i had to look up the haymarket affair, i'd never heard of it before. that seems like a pretty strong sign.

That's because the Haymarket Affair was when a bunch of communists murdered some cops, and then pitched a fit because some of the cops dared to shoot back.

yeah man, it is always funny to me how right wingers talk as if they're going against the status quo. by doing what exactly? lol, enforcing gender norms, keeping america capitalist, and trying to reintroduce other outdated shitty ideas.

@@milesbrown2261 LOL. Acknowledging obvious reality and not stealing things is the 'status quo'?

If your obvious reality is maintaining capitalist economic systems, not expanding on labor laws meaningfully, not regulating mega-corps especially on the emissions they produce, not supporting democratization of our current government assuming you're an American and don't want to remove the filibuster, not supporting an expansion of infrastructure as the progressives had wanted, then yea, you're supporting the status quo. You saying it is an obvious reality is meaningless. I might as well say Libertarian Socialism is a obvious reality and that stealing your worker's wages is why the status quo is bad. Overall it adds nothing to the conversation. Now when you say not stealing things, I get two reactions. First are you saying that socialism is when you steal things and the more things you steal is communism? If that's the case please read political theory or at the very least go back to middle school. If that is not the case, and you're dogwhistling to the BLM protests, well sorry to inform you but they were less violent than the civil rights protests, and most violent riots of the BLM protests were instigated by the police. So are you against the 1900s Civil Rights Protests, and you don't like MLK? Don't believe me? Then let Harvard show you how you're wrong. www.radcliffe.harvard.edu/news-and-ideas/black-lives-matter-protesters-were-overwhelmingly-peaceful-our-research-finds I know I have very few to go off with your comment, so I am just putting a few pointers out there, but eh. One last thing, if you support regressing things like removing social security, or reducing government spending on welfare (which we already neglect), or support regressive policies on social issues like making abortion illegal, and putting a chokehold on LGBTQ+ rights, well sorry pal you aren't for the status quo, you are by definition a reactionary. If you want to reply and to disprove anything I have said, go for it. I may remember to look back at this comment (probably not) and reply. @Ken Abbott

@@kenabbott8585 you are clearly a troll, lol.

@@zana397 "you are clearly a troll, lol." You clearly can't come up with an actual argument. LOL.

i wish Bernie and Mike had super-powers.

@@donHooligan why? what kind of infantile shit are you on?

@@wtfhah to stop fascism, ass-puddle.

Your pfp looks like you just got caught trying to hide a body.

@@omegahaxors3306 i got caught trying to bury elon

@@mush1e979 Epic.

@harlaudata they'd no doubt get angry calls from parents about teachers 'indoctrinating' the children

RIP brother ho

And really it's not even that the younger generation is radical, they're just asking for more social rights like European countries. Our radicalism is European norm.

Why are you hoping for radical leftism

Because conservatism is an inherently self-destructive ideology.

@@Mythil I think you mean relativism

Same "horror" of "Radical Militant Youth" was exploited for "Law and Order" in the 60's~70s. Private Prison Industry Won.

Very scary to see city/state/federal government own utilities. Your house can be taken from you if you don't pay your water bill for a city-owned water company, but you won't have that problem if it was privately-owned

@@cantstanja How TF can you say that with a straight face when mere months ago there was that catastrophic power grid failure in Texas because it was all privately-owned and the companies didn't maintain it properly because it was cheaper than winterizing it? Public utilities aren't something that should be run like a business because it leads to disasters born of neglect and greed. Profit perverts purpose. When the Nazis coined the concept of "privatization" by selling off Germany's state-owned industries to their wealthy industrialist friends, they weren't doing it because they thought it would be more efficient. It was all to enrich the oligarchs at the expense of everyone else's well-being.

Very true. There is a rich history of support for the Socialist Party and for socialists active outside of the SP. It is remarkable just how effective socialists have been despite the Democratic-Republican joint efforts to weaken the movement. Duly elected socialist legislators were expelled from office for simply being socialist. Yet over 1000 socialists were elected to public office in the U.S during the first 20 years of the 20th century. Take a look at a map identifying successful socialist campaigns at depts.washington.edu/moves/SP_map-elected.shtml But for the bipartisan conspiracy to keep socialists out of office coupled with the "red scare", Socialists would have been even more successful.

@@cantstanja lol no, pretty much all communities here run their own water treatment plant and I've never heard of that happening ever. Also in Saskatchewan we have provincial phone, power, natural gas and insurance companies. What a joy. Thanks to Tommy Douglas.

@@cantstanja you mean like the privately owned housing millions got kicked out of during the pandemic because they couldnt afford the rent due to being unable to work due to covid? yeah privately owned essentials really protect you well

Progressive = keep changing = no values.

no time like the present.

Young people are becoming progressive and wanting real change !

✊🏽✊🏽✊🏽

You can blow out a candle but you cannot blow out the fire of the socialist movement.

😂😂🤣

Got it, we're working on our effects right now and I'll send this to our designer. We've moved past this style for future videos so this will be the last one with effects like this.

@@TheGravelInstitute I'm gonna suggest different animators if possible. I always feel like the content is so dense and the animation only does a nominal job to enhance the understanding. Please keep your options open.

@@gueverdura6717 I like the animators style, and I think it gets better with each video

Yeah, take a page from the Vox videos playbook. They have the best animations of any channel IMHO.

@@zigfreidbop Kurzgesagt? Alan Becker? And many other channels I forgot?

UwU

Neither Canada nor Australia have very good social support programs either. Medicare in Canada for example, is very minimal, and doesn't cover a lot, like long term care, dental, ambulances, vision and hearing, physiotherapy, prescription drugs, mental health, and a host of other things.

@@philpottkentucky4802 Medicare in the US doesn't cover dental, ambulances, vision or hearing. There is a gigantic donut hole which makes prescriptions cost an arm and two legs, and whole host of other things. Bernard has tried to improve it but he has to fight two political parties just to move forward one inch.

Religion is also a big problem. 'Protestant work ethics' and 'prosperity gospel' practically teach people to hate poor people for their failures. If you look at the support for the Republican party: 25% of Americans that believe every word of the bible is true, 15% of Americans that are wannabe millionaires, owners of small business/stocks/property. That's it. That's the support base. If you succeed in making the newer generation less religious and more skeptical of religion, then the Republican party vanishes.

@@muuhpropertyyy2465 I would argue that the left’s abandonment of religion altogether has been harmful to left successfully organizing. Please keep in mind that religious leaders like Robert Rauschenbush fought to end child labor and developed the social gospel, later people like Martin Luther King Jr. lead civil rights and a United socialist movement. There has been a concerted effort to crush modernist Christianity which is largely anti-literalist and social gospel. Religious literalism and fundamentalism was a reactionary movement against the Modernist theological liberalism popular in Mainline Christianity. By 1900 most mainline clergy accepted evolution and science. But a backlash occurred in the 1920’s most famously with Monkey Trial Since then fundamentalists vs modernists played out in almost every denomination causing splits in the denominations themselves. But look how it has played out in more contemporary times, Obama walks away from the UCC church after Rev Wright‘s sermon criticizing US imperialism is made public, while Trump invites fundamentalists to the White House. As a result, Mainline churches which are progressive liberal Modernist historical critical and anti-literal and their leaders are marginalized in a very peculiar way in the USA. But I would argue that this is in part a type of state sponsored oppression. The US government actually sent troops to South America to crush Liberation Theology. A similar thing has happened domestically but through careful manipulation instead. Mainline churches believe in separation of church and state, but that is a political position. In fact the origin of the idea came from John Locke’s correspondence with Huguenots. Thereby Locke wrote in 1689, that "the church itself is a thing absolutely separate and distinct from the commonwealth.“ But this doesn’t mean that a church does not have political interests.

Ha e you tried improving yourself? And not worrying about repressing your neighbors? Nobody wants your BS.

Couldn't have been said any better than that 👏