Why everyone fears this commander. 

Would love to see you guys brew a few Brawl decks and go at it for a collaboration video.

Please do some BO3 you two! Love you both

I was so so hyped when I saw CGB getting matched with you in his vid D:

I saw the scoop

That instant scoop was really funny 😂

I’m out of the loop, where is cgb in this vid

@@mightyhulk1483 it’s in one of cgb‘s video. LVD scooped rightaway as he saw the name

I suspect it was more of a scoop to Golos. I def scoop to certain commanders.

i honestly wouldve loved to see the match and it looked like cgb was excited for it too. idk why legend dodged

@@PerfectlyPaintedPixels not LVD usual behavior

I know Lvd strays away from using alchemy cards, but I don't know if he ever explained why. So I got to ask, what exactly is wrong with alchemy cards? From what I know they're just virtual only cards.

@@reokado4783they aren’t balanced as well as paper. Frankly they are mostly way too good or efficient, very p2w feature from your friends at hasbro

@@reokado4783 Probably just hopping on the bandwagon to get props from people like the commenter above. As a content creator, you'd think they'd like playing with a larger cardpool with interesting effects that you don't get in paper. Crokeyz shows that the cards can be fun.

@@cardgamesletsgo2079nice strawman argument. Crokeyz still antisemitic on stream?

@@reokado4783 I think it's the increased complexity of some of the alchemy cards; in paper mechanics are limited in complexity because you keep track of everything manually; look at Draugr Necromancer from Kaldheim: the one and only purpose of putting the "Ice Counter" on the exiled card is to keep track of what was exiled by Draugr Necromancer and by extension what you can cast from your opponents exile thanks to Draugr Necromancer. In alchemy, something like "Perpetually" is too complicated for paper because there's no easy way to keep track of the changed effects for that SPECIFIC card that, most importantly, are kept even between zones such as the battlefield, exile, graveyard, your hand, and ESPECIALLY your library. Also things that a player isn't capable of doing without the aid of a program, like "seek" which fetches *RANDOM* cards from your library, which if a player tries to do in paper comes with the complication of not being able to without a doubt prove the seeked card was indeed random and not cherry-picked by the searcher. also there's a growing trend/meme of magic cards these days having way too much text, which Alchemy Cards indulge in frequently.

I even crafted Grave Pact for this deck, but ended up cutting it since we're relatively light on creatures. Will be much better in a deck like Jadar that actively sacrifices its own creatures.

Dude I know, and I've tried her a couple times for pioneer at my lgs but I'm a crappy builder 😂

Same. Love when legend gets cheeky.

same!

I know Lvd strays away from using alchemy cards, but I don't know if he ever explained why. So I got to ask, what exactly is wrong with alchemy cards? From what I know they're just virtual only cards.

​@@reokado4783 they're virtual only because they use mechanics that wouldn't be possible in paper magic. It defies the game sense and intuitions that people have developed for decades, and they're just not worth that cost

​@@reokado4783the thing that causes friction is that they are more cards to have to memorise which you'll never see in a real life game, plus some virtual-only mechanics are unintuitive and clunky. Basically, some people feel they aren't worth the effort of trying to learn. Because a lot of viewers have this opinion, content creators get forced into it as well because any Alchemy-forward content will not be watched as much so they won't get the same revenue on it

@@collin4555 You don't got to go into too much detail, but can I get an example of a card that would only work on arena and why its affect wouldn't be possible in paper magic? Like would it be too much of a time constraint to do in paper magic? Is that what you mean?

Never mind, I looked into it a little more and I get it now. Arena changed existing cards for rebalancing purposes. Yeah, I can get why that would urk people.

You just click and drag them into a different column.

More or less, although newer commanders are subject to change.

@@LegenVD I ask only because I was surprised to see Etali, Atraxa, et al, appear across from you. is Tergrid on the format boogeyman list?

@@FrelanceEQ Yeah feels like it, but I don't think it necessarily deserves to be.

"say you are a bad person without saying you are a bad person"

@@Jejfimwianfn 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Yes, of course you can Thoughtseize yourself, but LVD meant that in won't trigger Tergrid's ability, she cares only about opponent's discarding

The upside is usually not worth the drawback.

Countered, because they just let it sit there on the stack forever deciding if they are going to counter or just casting Opt.

In my conclusion I said that I couldn't recommend the deck because it's stuck in hell queue.

@@LegenVD Yeah I know. But you certainly showed a majority of winning games. I appreciate your response, but it definitely doesn't perform as well as your games in the video would suggest. For those of us who follow your channel for deck ideas, it turns a month of grinding in to a waste of wildcards.

As I mentioned at the end of the video I can’t recommend the deck. But making use of that free mulligan to look for more mana acceleration is important.

lol you can’t win with tergrid 😂

@@honestabe411 lol you need to bash on other comments to make you feel good about yourself. Good for you man. Too bad you need it tho

@@Scorpionrzz I feel good when I win games of mtg

I did not recommend building the deck for good reason!

Why assume its a rage quit? People have lives. On top of that, he was obviously making that deck as content, knowing cgb could be recording and spoil his deck. Thus the quit.

Still could have been someone else

Why dislike?

@@stupidstutesman2444 for the lie in the title. No one is afraid of this garbage ))