@@ThomisticInstitute FYI Antipope Francis isn't the pope. The pope is Pope Gregory XVIII. See tcwblog. As for your talk, it is lacking perfection. Granted through ignorance you cite at least one schismatic and probably heretical document - LG. The title is possibly - hopefully mistakenly - manipulative. Any typical viewer will say that the Church must be separate from the state because that is the law. But theoretically this is illegitimate. Only a Catholic confessional state is strictly legitimate.
Could another lead move at 36:20 not be a kind of pure critique? Using Nietzsche against the moderns so to speak, in the spirit Chesterton ascribes to God when he answered Job’s skepticism with a deeper skepticism?
