Why Religion & Science are Completely Incompatible 

"I cannot recall the last time something like that happened in politics or religion.” (1987)" Friend Sagan, that is because you are thick or ly-ing, or both.

"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is, than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." No argument there. What if atheism is the delusion? There is good evidence the God of the bible exists, what evidence do you have to support a belief in atheism?

​@@elkhuntr2816 Don't ask him, ask God.

@@elkhuntr2816 -- Atheism is simply a reply to this question -- Do you believe in any god? If the answer is No = Atheist... nothing more. So how can it be delusional when it makes no positive claim? AND there is ZERO Real Evidence for one. You said there is good evidence that the "god" of the bible Exists. If that were true, you and others would have Proven it by now. Be honest, it would make World News!! But... nothing. If there is Real Evidence, present it. Prove your god, should be easy.

@@gj9157 " Don't ask him, ask God." This is what the bible says: "The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good." The motivation behind atheism isn't complicated. The belief allows you to do what you want without ever having to face God. I'm just calling the atheist's bluff. They try to mock Christians as being "unscientific" and believing something without evidence. Its actually the opposite. There is good evidence (including scientific evidence) for God. Yet atheists rarely can provide any evidence to support their point of view. Its usually just "yeah, but I simply lack belief..." Doesn't matter, you still need arguments based on evidence for why you "lack belief..." Or counters to the evidence that does exist.

@@elkhuntr2816 -- Atheism is simply a reply to this question -- Do you believe in any god? If the answer is No = Atheist... nothing more. So how can it be delusional when it makes no positive claim? AND there is ZERO Real Evidence for one. You said there is good evidence that the "god" of the bible Exists. If that were true, you and others would have Proven it by now. Be honest, it would make World News. But... nothing. If there is Real Evidence, present it.

Any theistic religion is.

The only difference in your belief and mine. You see religion is harmful except yours. I see all religions as harmful.

Why do you think it's abusive?

@irwanlaksmono9421 I don't think it. I know it from first hand experience. The most insidious evil organized crime syndicate in all history. Diocese of Phoenix. Dale Fuschek, Jack John Spaulding, Father John Picard, Father Blaze. People committed suicide because of these frauds, pedophiles, con artists, and abusers. Psychopaths and sociopaths. That is what the Roman Catholic Church breeds, protects, and promotes. Pure human malevolence perfected. The tyranny of evil men for power, status, fame, greed, and money. "Religion poisons everything" - Christopher Hitchens

My mother told me just before she died, crying, that the four years just after WWII that she had to spend with those oh-so-pious nuns were much more horrible than the five years of war. She lived in Belgium.

Yes indeed.

True

I study religion and science and they are both beautiful. You atheists are mistaken if you think that science and religion are like two boxers in a boxing ring fighting eachother.

@@blupandax7902 I doubt what you mean about 'study' means what is in the dictionary, as you have proven you have no idea about what is the difference between the words Theory, Hypothesis, and the meaning of Peer-review.

@@dorkception2012 I know what those words mean. I studied biology and physics in school. I am more familiar with those words than you are.

I dont know any Christians who think you must be a Christian to be good. They just think that because they submit to christ, the wrong that they have done is covered, they dont think that christianity itself makes them better people or anything like that

@@user-nz8uy1zm3z Christians believe morality comes from god

and they make the laws and run the county`s, no wonder we are all in queer street!

My thoughts exactly

Or between an argument and its conclusion. The heavens display wonder....Therefore it is child abuse to say it was designed. Umm....WHAT?!?

@@martinmoffat5417 What are you even trying to say?

@@dorkception2012 The argumentation is illogical Observation: The universe displays wonder and complexity Conclusion: Therefore it is child abuse to say it was designed

Religion cannot go away as it is based on truth.

Some people will always be so self centered that even though they have a low IQ score, they're still better than everyone else. They can't even show actual evidence of their nothingness in the sky.

It will be replaced by the abuse of power. Look to all countries which "killed god."" Ask those who lived under them if their lives were so much better. Imagine post WW2 Western Europe without a single bombed cathedral rebuilt, or Notre Dame left as a post-conflagration relic to dead religion. Neither is beautiful. I happen to like beauty.

Science explains the workings of matter and energy in time and space. Religion explains why people and societies act as they do. In both cases, some are closer to what human flourishing requires, others, very detrimental. The plastics industry, and radical Islam are examples of detrimental of each.

@glenliesegang233 Science explains the workings of our environment. Science cannot and never will contradict the Bible. The Bible governs the cosmos, human behavior, government, business and all other things.

When 'science' can explain the existence of the universe, then it might have something worth listening to.

as if you know what is wrong to beginn with

​@@electricmanistso science doesn't have something worth listening to because we don't yet know all the intracacies of the origins of the cosmos? Therefore goddidit, amirite? I guess you should get off the amazing device you're reading this on, brought to you by science™.

@@electricmanist It’s called cosmology, in case you’ve forgotten.

@@MetaphysicalZero I do because I know that snakes and donkeys can’t talk for one.

ignorance is the same all over THIS world, and can be different and also the same on this side of the street and on the other.

@@MetaphysicalZero Your pedestrian comment is the perfect example of one of the least informative I have ever read. It is like saying that if the sun goes below the western horizon, we might be in for some darkness, at least until morning. Unfortunately, a severe blow to the side of the head and homeschooling can make people say that sort of stuff.

@@VaughanMcCue the comment was meant for ignorant people to react to it just in case you didn’t noticed

Its unfortunate that you cannot see the power within ALL matter. No doubt you've heard of atomic structures-- so now envisage this power extending to the furthest star in the universe. (Continuously too ) Sad that some of the 'greatest minds' (even you it seems) are unable to recognize the intelligent power within all that is ! Maybe you could start by explaining the source of atomic power ??

​@@electricmanist Do yourself a favour and pick up a physics textbook.

@@OmniversalInsect Oh do you know that I've always wanted to know why everything exists at all , not to mention why the speed of light is what it is, and how many galaxies (stars) there are in the universe-- and I almost forgot that mysterious force called gravity-- maybe it's not accidentally there just to keep our feet on the ground surely ? Perhaps it's got something to do with keeping our (associated ) planets at the same speed/distance from the sun ?? Strange don't you think, how all these things (plus millions of others) just happen to be so ? Do all these things happen just by themselves or perhaps God created it thus. ?? Now there's a thought worth considering ! Science doesn't seem to be able to explain all this does it ? Or (don't forget) why you- and billions of others exist at all for that matter !!

@@electricmanistmaking a god the answer to unknowns is infantile.

@@damienschwass9354 A really insightful comment, although I would be interested to know your explanation for the existence of all that is. (Including your self of course). (You might need to be thoughtful before you reply "that everything is an accident and without meaning "

Evidence made me atheist

I never was a theist. I was born an atheist. What made me never choose religion was all of the magical thinking and usually the ones pushing the religion were complete assholes and I didn't want to turn into one of them.

Everyone is born an Atheist and everyone remains so until religion is forced upon them.

He deceived you.Thats not science. In the same second youll see things moving by itself, you atheism will did instantly. "Exorcism World leading Psychiatric Authority speaks out" with Richard Gallagher

​@@JuanManuel-ep8doWhich? The Tiktaalik? That was proved wrong. Like all of them

OMG you actually bought into that? Shame on you! You are the ones who teach your kids about Santa Claus KNOWING that he is false. On the other hand Christians teach their kids the TRUTH that they are fearfully and wonderfully made bearing the imago Dei the likeness of God with each hair on their numbered by God. That God cares for them and loves them deeply.

My parents taught me Christian beliefs as a child, and I love them for it. My faith in Jesus is what protected me from living a disgusting life full of alcohol abuse.

@@martinmoffat5417 but he doesnt. Any of us can die in an instant. Would a loving god cause unnecessary suffering

Anyone who was raised in a religious family was GROOMED...you know, that thing the Far Right Wing is always screaming about.

@@random22453 You claim its unnecessary so the burden of proof rests on you to establish that. Christians do not have a complete comprehension of death and suffering. But we believe the suffering exists to expose our sins and the exercise of our free wills to rebel against the Creator. We believe in this way that God will bring more people out of darkness and into the fellowship of light

If that is your belief, do you believe once religion is abolished, people will begin to act rationally? Can you name the positive benefits of a positive religion? What do I mean? A positive religion promotes its followers to behave in ethical unselfish ways. A negative religion pits us vs them with hatred and violence towards "them." The truth of science is that it describes the world of things, the "is" of matter and energy, time and space. Religion describes the human condition and it's "ought to's" All living systems transcend lower levels of molecular interactions because they become "processes" and are really no longer "things." Humans transcend the strict dictates of molecular forces through informational processing by highly complex nervous systems in 2 major ways-as the logical verbal thinking about, and emotional processing of individual, group, societal, and national experience .

Yes. Eugenics, stop wasting resources on the premature, the Downs and other inferior syndrome infants and the elderly, and all the non-productive lives which drain natural resources and damage the planet further through plastic waste from the health care industry, and the use of resources for mere pleasure seeking humans who do not serve the greatest good. That is the rational, logical, scientific way humanity should advance. No religion should oppose cyborgs, parthenogenesis, social control as China's social media experiment is doing for stability and control of thought and opposition. Harvesting organs from those whose beliefs cause trouble for those in need is a good use of the bodies of those whose minds have been corrupted by religious beliefs who will not be indoctrinated or modified through aversive behavioral modification techniques, into model citizens, to serve as examples for those who would believe in anything higher than the State. Once god is dead, humanity is free from the 10 Commandments and everything implied by Imago Dei, free from the ridiculous notion "all humans are somehow equal." Gone is sin, evil is merely what someone decides for themselves it is. End the nonsense of religion. All power to our glorious human and AI leaders.

Well let's first dole out heaps of birth control or humanity will destroy the earth.

BRILLIANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Don't you think it's a little bit disingenuous to blame 85% of worlds population on what 12 people did? I just as well could blame science for the atom bcmb

And flying to the moon also gets some killed....

Flies you into...

​@@irenehartlmayr8369Stay silent and be thought a fool, instead of speaking and removing all doubt.

Religion is not about astronomy.But science was not around yet in those days...

The Bible made no claim about the sun revolving around the Earth. The Bible made claims about the order of creation. The Bible is correct.

​@@EnthusiasticTent-xt8fh There are more religious textbooks than just your little black book. Why is your religious beliefs better than any other?

@@Istandby666 My black book is 100% true.

​@@EnthusiasticTent-xt8fhthat's a statement you cannot possibly prove.😂 Your little black book is the quasi-historical account of a middle-eastern people, who's authors borrowed heavily from the stories and characters of other religions. The ancient writings found in your Bible, have never been translated looking through the lens of what the ancient people would have meant by certain ideas. I listened to a Jewish Rabbi explain that the creation story was considered poetry. It was never thought of as a literal account of creation. The cadence of the original Aramaic suggests poetry. There is not a preacher or priest in this country, who can say they "understand the bible." To interpret this ancient manuscript, you must not only be an expert in the three languages of Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek, but you must also understand the culture deeply, including all the nuances missed by outsiders. Not only that, but one must understand how all of that would have been different two-thousand and up to thirty-five hundred years ago. There is no such person alive today. If they say they are, they are deluding themselves. Your little black book has been made by religious fanatics, to be so much more than it can ever truly be... a cobbled together patchwork of various types of writing written by highly imaginative individuals.

And every time they find out they were wrong. Recently they have discovered galaxies there where should be any at all.That destroy big bang theory.

@@cristianpopescu78when new discoveries are made the textbooks are updated.

So far nothing has destroyed the big bang theory lol, you're misinformed. ​@cristianpopescu78

@@vadim666er In years.For people who knows history of science all new discoveries have been accepted in years.Even the theory of Continental plates was in the beginning ridiculed. Some are never regarded. Example: the Consciounesse isnt just a brain process , for which are strong evidence. It can exist beyond physical body, which chalenge atheistic Materialismus.

​@@cristianpopescu78what evidence is there that consciousness exists without a body? How are you defining consciousness exactly?

Your church failed you. That has nothing to do with Christianity. I recommend reading Mere Christianity by C.S Lewis as it is not primarily religious but rather fills that gap of what we all wish had been taught in church. He was a former Atheist and has now become a world renowned author both inside of and outside of the church ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ElNB3tldviA.htmlsi=iBzfz2xVOZAhFza-

Perhaps it's time to investigate the existence of the universe itself (not to mention the power of all the atomic structures of all matter) !?

Heaven is not physical,its a state of being.And materialism is a primitive mental state.

very logical of you, very logical, yes, you still trust the musings of your six year old mind

@@user-nz8uy1zm3z Very cynical indeed--worthy of a 6 year old perhaps.--on a good day !! Ok, so you don't accept the existence of a supreme creative mind (God), so let's be precise here, --do you really believe that everything that exists (both in this world and throughout the universe), to be nothing more than totally meaningless ? In the affirmative, how can you or your thoughts can have any sort of meaning when all that is, is meaningless. ?

Religion is dying, but politicians keep it alive, because it is useful to control the sheepl.

You are a Destroyer. Thanks for your admission.

​@@EnthusiasticTent-xt8fhSo are most gods, and people worship them.

I'm glad there are some atheists brave or stupid enough to admit their real goals

@@unkaumanguy1439 People only worship the God of the Bible. He's the only God.

Spot on!

Look around yourself while still on earth, not to mention the seemingly endless universe. Try explaining all that away !

@@electricmanist One does not have to know the answer in order to recognize what obviously isn't one.

Its a silly fixation to focus on a book and take that as the point of departure to put down everybody else.

@@maudeeb3502 What 'obviously' isn't ?? Remember. as far as we can tell. the universe has no limits . So where do you go from here ?

Try mushrooms. Not addictive and better than drinking Everything in moderation though

Hello! I think you were referring to Mr. Lawrence Krauss. He is the one speaking in the video. Just a friendly reply! 🙂🙂

What a comment. Bravo bro. Almost what i usually tell my mum and bro. I live in an African setting so it would be difficult for them to break free of the delusion

Right. You can see how both belief in God and a belief in science complement each other but some say otherwise. And yet some of the greatest minds amongst us believed in thy God especially those who came along with inventions or other technology advances as well as those who bought their artistic skills to bare from Michelangelo’s paintings to others who knew God and expressed it in their paintings as well as musical prodigies. Most people who don’t believe in God do so for many reasons and yet Billions believe in God so how do Billions believe in Something imaginary? And many say it’s caused great harm in society but what if no one believed in God at all? What if everyone did as thy wilt? Do you actually think this world would be a better place? Imagine a world without God where everyone resorted to their basic animalistic needs and had to take from others to survive or joined in groups to take on other groups of people. A mad max kind of world would entail and yet that is what is coming our way as many walk away from God and millions and millions more don’t even bother to understand if God is a valid concept to adhere to. But it’s always let’s blame those who believe in God because they are the problem and not those who do whatever they want to and don’t care what their consequences are for doing whatever comes to mind.

Necessity is the mother of invention.

@@Sue-xv8os then take from others to bring about your necessary survival because those days are coming..

@@davidrexford586 You must have slept during history class.

@@Sue-xv8os I got straight A’s in history class. What are you talking about? Why do some of you run around presupposing what I know and what I shouldn’t know? I should just do the same right? Should I run around and call everyone a complete idiot for not wanting to know God? I am no better than anyone else and don’t claim to be. A sinner saved by grace and nothing more. A sinner who decided to turn to God and I got my own proof of God and don’t run around bragging about it and telling others you must believe in God because I do. I just say everyone can Find God the same way I did or don’t. We all are given Faith by God to understand God with Romans12v3. So by Faith believe that scripture applies to all or don’t believe it. Go to God willingly or don’t go at all. And if you think don’t go at all is a way of forcing you to go anyways you determine that yourself.

He was good with his hands!

Yeah not a science textbook genius. There are other disciplines of knowledge. I should also mention that a scientific model doesn’t tell you anything either unless you grant the assumptions. That’s why they keep changing

@@martinmoffat5417 What assumptions have you heard about any peer-reviewed source that would claim anything that hasn't been proven? Also, do you understand the difference between the words 'Theory' and 'Hypothesis'? Every time some illiterate try to argue, how science is unreliable, is the first sign they have never actually learned what the scientific method even mean.

We know what the scientific method is, we just don’t feel convinced by it. Just because something is peer-reviewed doesn’t mean it’s true. Dark energy has been peer-reviewed enough to be considered a valid scientific theory, yet we still have scientists who oppose it and say the tired light theory is better than dark energy theory.

​@@martinmoffat5417 the only assumprtion that scientific model assumes is that all the observations that have ever been made are not all coincidently innacurate

Yup it's all in the mind, that's where it starts and ends when we stop the thinking and look at the content of our mind without judgement or coming to any conclusions, try it. You won't need drugs anymore

One can deny that life has any purpose, but how about morality, truth, or even love ? Without purpose everything is meaningless. Try living your life without these or any other values !!

They are treasured bits of literature. They are not rationally composed however. So an idiot like William Lane Craig can claim that the he believes that the ancient Israelites committed a genocide against the Canaanites, and can claim it was a justified genocide. In this regards,the Bible contains lovely bits of writing, but as a whole it is not great literature. It is not Homer,it is not Sophocles. Those are truly great.

@@oldpossum57 Sure, the bible appears to be the collected works of oral tradition passed down from generation to generation. The form of the Christ story is found something near 20 times in other cultures (Milthra, Osiris, etc). So the bible is a collected work of many writers, there's no way it would be considered coherent and rational as you were saying. But fragments of the bible are of great value. The gospel of john for example is a great mediation on the paradox of consciousness (R. Steiner). Most of the text I'm interested in though are pre-christian Gnostic texts such as Thunder Perfect Mind (Sophia the 36th archon). The more I get into the obscure texts, the more it becomes apparent that the ancients were not being literal in their stories, they are metaphysical meditations and allegories, generally limited to interpretation.

@@twobrainedserpent All of which is quite lovely. My favourite ancient texts are the Greek playwrights and Homer. While I am sure I read it with modern eyes, the critical insight of the late Charles Segal at Yale tells me my reading of Oedipus Tyrannus is not unreasonable, and certainly better than the hackneyed late Victorian Christian reading by Butcher and others. There are compelling bits of the NT, and the arc of the Christ story is obviously profoundly compelling. As a narrative, as a myth, it is a brilliant expression of human suffering and human desire. That said, our old understandings are drawn from the naive human mind. They are anthropocentric. Their actors are anthropomorphic, their mythic plots are human. I think we are at a place when we need to realize that our minds are those of highly social hunter/ gatherer apes, using three pound monkey- meat brains. Our scientific awareness is such that we can see ourselves as one primate species on a planet that is one of the rare ones to develop any life, let alone conscious life. One group of mathematicians, working out the odds of the Fermi paradox, suggested it is just possible that so far intelligent life like ours has only happened once. And in five million years* or less, will be no more. With that perspective, the “blue dot” perspective, I don’t think it especially valuable to be anthropocentric any more. * E. O. Wilson wrote that this was the average span for a mammalian species.

I disagree there are plenty of animals that are cruel and seem to enjoy torturing. Cats being one of them. But I think that it's a personality trait that we notice more in people because of at least in small part selection bias.

Bill really didn't make a compelling point tho

God IS religion Idk why zealots pretend to separate them

The cosmic emperor will have none of that. Hail me and worship me. I have not helped humans in any way since I created them!

Stephen King does a much better job at that.

Religion might be something entirely different from God, but the two are mutually exclusive. Without one the other would not exist.

@@JustReedand Dean Koontz.

Lemaître conceived of the Big Bang not because of his religion, but independently of it. There are many Catholics and Protestants for whom most of the Bible is just old stories, and jesus just a metaphor.

@@oldpossum57 I believe modern science developed out of a religious worldview (I refer you to Tom Holland & Alister McGrath) The title of the above video is Why Science & Religion are COMPLETELY Incompatible - "There is no conflict between religion and science." - Georges Lemaitre & “Science is beautiful. It deserves to be loved for itself, as it is a reflection of God’s creative thought.” - Lemaitre’s address on returning to Louvain University after receiving the Francqui Prize

@@AlanJas-ut6ym Lemaitre wrote in the 1950s. I know of a few scientistists including a Jesuit cosmologist who are still religious. But either they believe that the resurrection is just a metaphor or that the second law of thermodynamics can be broken at whim. If the latter, they are intellectual cheats. At the heart of all religious thought is magical thinking, irrational thought. Scientific thinking pushed the magic out. Laplace pushed gods out of cosmology around 1800: On n’a plus besoin de cette hypothèse. Darwin, trained for the Anglican priesthood, pushed gods out of the realm of biology. Crick, Watson & Franklin found the true mechanism of evolutionary variation. Freud, Adler, Jung started us on the road to understanding the human psyche. Richard Leakey and others showed how we descended from apes. Comparative human sciences explain why it is that we invent religions and gods. I cannot see any remaining purpose for your gods. I do see that belief in them promotes confusion, hatred, reckless conduct. Climate change appears to be a much greater existential threat than nuclear war. Having so many people falsely believing in pie in the sky does not advance the common interest.

@@AlanJas-ut6ym briefly checked your Holland & McGrath. They are not scientists. No scientist ever even contemplates gods when designing an hypothesis. Epistemologically, a theory containing a god or gods of the omni-sort would have zero explanatory power. In science, gods serve no purpose. Console yourself how you wish. But all the evidence says you indulge in wishful thinking.

Spiritual significance of religion is wishful thinking. Spiritual significance of the understanding of how the universe behaves is awesome.

@@Sue-xv8os Spiritual significance of the understanding of how the universe behaves is wishful thinking. Spiritual significance of religion is awesome.

There is no evidence of a god. Hence the fact that all societies have ethics proves there is a moral sense that originates in our primitive instincts. Every society comes to certain core beliefs. All societies protect their own against violence from within or from without. It is usually bad to kill or injure “us”, and acceptable under other circumstances to kill and harm “them”. Even today, army chaplains bless soldiers instead of risking death to prevent violence. Whereas rational thought within cultures has extended the sphere of “us” not only to all humans (in theory), but also to animals and the planet itself. Understanding how human ethical systems really work, instead of imagining an absolute set of prescriptions from a god, allows us to understand why we actually have moral quandaries about circumcision, abortion, capital punishment, gun ownership, military service, wars,. The inhospitable universe killing 250,000 in 2004 tsunami makes sense. The “mysterious ways of gods” are not good explanations. Science can explain why people do harm to others. Religions cannot.

You are just as significant as 80 kg of silica. Get used to it.

What's a devil? Words like hell, satan, evil, and the like only are created by breeders of religious books.

Google?

You would need to define the question better than that, and design a heck of an experiment. Then you would learn, “Some do, some don’t”.

There is no such thing as creator.

What creator? What evidence have you?

Scientific thinking provides some answers. Some questions will prove not to have answers. That there isn’t an answer is okay too.

Absolutely not. What's wrong with reality? Is standing on your own feet not better than hanging desperately onto your mother's skirt as an adult better.

It is not fairy tale because it takes time for electro magnetic waves to reach a certain distance.

For the most part it's a way for many people to earn a living. I don't think they believe either.

The earlier they start you on the drug the harder it is to quit.

If a cluster of galaxies were actually 5 billion light years away from us, you would never even come close to being able to observe it in a lifetime because the speed of information is too slow. That's how we know that the universe is in us, not vice versa as these scientists believe.

@@johnmalik7284 OMG. It doesn't work that way.

@@johnmalik7284 WTF are you babbling about? "the speed of information is too slow." 🤦😀

@@Seticzech Scientists, not all scientists, believe there is an observer, that actually exists, separate from observations. It is a false assumption. Scientists resist this fact because science is about observers explaining reality. You've heard them say "shut up and calculate"? They believe that matter, the observer, generates consciousness, generates information. If that's true then you would only be able to see 100 light years of of the universe if you lived for 100 years. Information speed is 186,000 miles per second.

So, if Dawkins says the encoding of DNA base sequences is digital, ( actually, not binary or base 10 but base 64) and a simple life form of 50 proteins 50 a.a. long ( not counting the 64! ways to fill in the codon to amino acid relationship called the genetic code) is 1 in 64^50*50, which is far greater than scientific criterion of any critical, crucial event must be less than 10^120 ( odds of randomly picking 1 specific proton in 10^10 universes) how do you explain the creation of life on Earth, twice ( review the DNA (or, RNA world) mechanisms plus the need for all the hardware with 10,000 preloaded tRNA molecules each correctly loaded with one specific amino acid? No self-copying anything can randomly generate the proofreading and DNA repair systems, without there can be no evolution... The evidence demands a Superintelligence which created it all. The properties of quarks are part of how spacetime behaves. Review the filling of electron s,p,d,f orbitals ( and they overlap!) as the proton number increases in the Periodic table. Only the precision of quark/EM/ gluon/electron charge, mass, velocity, can permit that. Review the number of spectral lines of hydrogen. Again, quark/electron precision. Some Easter Bunny or Sky Daddy to pull off those feats. Smarter than Bill Gates, Watson, and Crick combined. And smarter than all the particle physicists on Earth, combined. We don't even know what space and time really are, or energy, or gravity. All we can do is describe relationships. Doubt me? Take what I have written to a molecular biologist and quantum physicicist. Their standard answer is, " we don't know yet, but scientific progress eventually will." Not what the statistics show. Disprove a Superintelligence. Anyone can shoot the Easter Bunny full of holes. Even Elmer Fudd.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3t-hbhI99yQ.htmlsi=I_bhWPG_AJnNugxJ

Do you give some respect when the reality of the situation is their parents didn't tell them about Santa or the Easter Bunny and they managed to get all the way to high school (and possibly somehow past) without any friends bringing up the question or teachers bringing it up? My former high school teacher told us the story of the time he broke the news to a 10th grader as he assumed the whole class knew. Some other stories I've read also have sad backstories related to the kid's home life.

If your only going to have one god it has to be Bob Seger.

Hell is just a word created by man talking about God and the BIBLE. If you want to believe in Hell, then believe that your God created it. After all, your God created everything.

We don't need saving.

@@JustReed climate change too late so depressing to even type I am going to take a nap

@@chamicels 😊

@@JustReed lol

This comment section is quite a bit depressing in how lonely I feel browsing. No one's an absolute skeptic, they all think they got the answers. Its easier to start a conversation about aliens existing than it is about religion. Seems the only reason theists ever respond is some recruitment scheme, no one wants to help someone wonder about reality its self if it takes them elsewhere. The atheists are far better but these types of discussions are usually uninteresting to them, only had two atheists who were fun to talk to in terms of religion. All the others made it more fun to talk hobbies and sports.

Not only possible, it are factual two different things.

@@Robert-xs2mv that means that there is no science in churches, what does the word science means?

@@MetaphysicalZero That is your interpretation. It means something different to me.

@@Robert-xs2mv science means knowledge just in case you forgot the question. That here is no knowledge in churches aka science is like to say there is no possible calculation with numbers just to make a simple analogy. But if you think you know it better more power to you and God bless you in the future

What's the difference between true science & modern science?

Are you serious?

@@dorkception2012 Yes, I'm not saying Religion is correct literal facts. I'm saying that neuroscience has not gotten far enough.

@@nyworker What is unnatural to you, that our brain is capable of art and math at the same time? What is your experiment that proves your claim?

Yes. The mind that figured out scientific method and experimental controls and statistical analysis and acceptance that the answer might be counterintuitive is an extraordinary achievement. Science can explain why we make the art and music we do.

Original founders of science lived in a world of superstition and fear of being ostracized, locked up, tortured, or killed for non-belief.

“The founders of science were all Christian.” Bullshit! Many famous scientists were christians because of this accident: they lived in modern Europe when there was no other way to explain the existence of life than to invent gods. The prevailing culture was Christian so they were christians or Jews. Their religion did not lead them toward science. Likewise you might note these people were males: that is because women of the time were not educated. The Chinese and Indians and Arabs were doing math, astronomy and chemistry when the christians were living in squalid mud huts. The history of science and the history of democracy and of progress is the history of disbelieving in magical beings. Your god is now a completely unnecessary imaginary beast.