Not at hustler casino live! He found a good spot until he provided unsubstantiated evidences that led him to his down fall. Do you want to play against him where he wants his money back after he lost a pot? Come on man!
@@ShawshankLam I highly doubt that the apology tour will repair his image. Name me a player that is willing to play against him without risking that he will ask the losing pot back to him!
@@Alexandertygreat are you nuts? Garret is not welcomed by the whole poker world right now, not just Hustler. No one would want to play poker with a man like him, especially for those bosses
I would bet small like 40% pot and fold to a raise. But this is also because I will sometimes bet small on the river with the nuts to induce a raise. With this small bet I think J8 will call and only full houses will raise and with the raise being around pot sized, it’s an easy fold.
@@hugovaz777 But when he went nuclear about Robbi, then that's when his toxic side came out. The fallout forced the HCL folks to decide if he was worth keeping. When they let him go, they were trying to see "How do we make normal poker people interested in poker again?" That's when they turned to Alexandra "Alex Moneymaker" Botez, who won 450 grand in "Ludwig Ahgren's Million-Dollar Game." She had a good friend base in the Creator Community, so she brought in several streamers with good pockets to play "Creator Nights," and she has also been testing her "pain threshholds" with "Max Pain Monday" appearances.
You play poker to win money. It is the players that he played with that has issues with him since he won too much. I bet you would feel the same way if you play against Garrett!
@@LA-xj3tz He took too much and they took umbrage with him. They then went to Nick, and the J-4 fiasco with Robbi forced that issue into an uglier light than needed to be.
Nitucci sold him so hard in my opinion for a random bimbo. Without Garret, HCL was basically nothing and now that it is more popular, Garrett is no longer needed. I know it is all business at the end of the day, but have some decency. Nitucci just doesn’t look the honourable type.
Its an awful river punt from Garrett. 100% agree with Jonathan's analysis, I only add that to check-call your opponent has to be floating with some pretty spicy combos as well as turning some weaker pairs into bluffs. Most opponents will not stick around with (say) KT clubs or AT diamonds.
Only some people miss him. But I am among them. Garrett is a very good poker player. What they are showcasing now is just crazy players… By the way, I used to get in big trouble playing J7-I don’t play it anymore. Even J7s is trouble. So in Garrett’s spot, I typically check-call the river. But I can see how going 1/2 pot-fold might be a good option. We no longer have the nuts, so we can go for a non-polarizing bet size and just fold to a raise. Check-call exposes us to having to call a shove, and Gal could have hit boats and flushes. We block some flushes but no boats. Honestly I can’t see betting the river with T9 here with both spades and boats coming in. And if Gal shoves, I don’t think it’s an obvious check-call, either. Maybe check and randomize to a shove?
You think a good player donk jams that river holding a flopped offsuit straight with no blockers? LMAO! You don't know what a good player is obviously.. He donked this hand like he donked it off to Robbie with 8 high and not only claimed he was cheated (again while holding 8 high FFS!) then bullied the money back, that's a scumbag move.
@@RoCkShaDoWWaLkEr LOL You obv. spent about 30 seconds on your analysis. Garrett knows Gal won't bet weaker hands very often, so he can only get a reasonable amount of value by betting. The spades were a backdoor and a boat is unlikely, given how soft Gal played it. So Garrett will get a small amount of value with his shove, but he can't get value by checking. Garrett must have believed (1) Gal has very few bluffs in his range, and (2) Gal would not bet weaker hands. So his choices were to shove to maximize the small amount of value that he could get, or check/fold. The shove is A LOT better for his table image.
x/call...... depending on how much he bets, we now have a marginal hand considering Gals range and ours. We need to put some of our best nut hands in our xing range on this river so that when gal does decide to shove we don't just have a bunch of folds, but this hand just doesn't have great equity against a shove range on this river. However, we have a straight and a lot of bets less than pot will force us to call, otherwise he's going to be able to overbluff us although, what bluffs?
I’d probably make the bet and fold to the raise. And yes I did pause. 😊 Just went back and saw how small the raise would be. Maybe check and fold to a shove??
tl;dr around 70% check-fold, 30% jam I think it's an awkward spot, because I don't think we have a way of winning by checking. We chose to overbet, so checking now says basically that we have a straight or nothing, so we'll have to fold to a jam. I think we have no claim to the flush, so the best we can do is to either give up and cut losses or jam semibluff, which is actually a rare case of beating large chunk of opponent calling range, as by jamming we rep JJ or 88, so J8 and AJ might call. Obviously this time jamming would make us broke, but on average I don't think it's bad.
Garrett's bet on the river really surprised me. What hands does Gal have when he calls flop, and then calls the massive overbet on the turn? I'm thinking primarily 2 pair, sets, flush draws, and straight draws. Straight draws are even questionable as a gutshot isn't getting a good price on that turn, esp. with the SPR at that point. For the former hands, almost all of them improved on that river! J8 didn't, but that's about it. Now, maybe because Garrett thinks Gal is too call happy, he thinks that Gal is more weighted toward single pair holdings like a pair of jacks, or maybe top pair that improved on the turn, like queen/jack. That seems pretty thin to me - too much of Gal's range there improved on the river, and the portion that didn't is too likely to fold to your all-in. Consider - if you're Gal, which hands do you have that call flop, turn, and river that do NOT beat Garrett?
what hand calls a flop check raise and a overbet turn that you beat now on the river and calls a bet? J8s maybe or QJ?? I don't know. I would probably check and fold or bet small and fold to raise since the other guy really likes calling.
Gal is a savage, went toe to toe with Garret in the first stream in HC. He beat Garret in a sensational hand with both having air and reraising each other all streets. Best dogfight I have seen in my life.
I think we still need to bet river, we have enough nutted hands they can't freely jam into us. Backdoor spades getting there is probably bad for our range in that I don't think we can have much JXss here and things like ATss are often 3-betting pre-flop limiting our gut-shots + over + backdoor spades, still I think we have a large enough percentage of the flushes and boats we shouldn't be checking range here and we are usually going to be good when called. That said if we bet and get jammed on I don't think we can call (our 9s is a great blocker but we just look so strong they should not be bluffing often). If stack sizes were a bit deeper I'd probably go with 2/3s, given that we are slightly too short for that so I like the 21,000 suggested.
I like the shove. Could get hero called by a lot of 2 pair hands. Usually still good. I play mostly 5 card plo so this river is like an auto lose but not in this game. Garrett bluffs big here enough he certainly stands to get value. Like gal with kk with k of spades easily could call. And a nit roll btw. Just annoying to call that slow with a hand that can't fold and against a balanced player. Only way i can understand is if that 68k is the bottom of his roll, which is doubtful.
Garrett: "Dude slowrolled me" Gal: "Dude scared the shit out of me" When the board pairs on the river I bet half the pot and get ready to fold to a raise. I think Garrett was expecting to win when Gal just called.
What would I do? Silently cry because my flopped nut flushes never survive the runout. RIP nut flush. Then I would call anyway because I wouldn't believe my luck could be that bad.
Here is what happened. Robbie, if I remember her name, thought she had a 3 in her hand for bottom pair. Or whatever that card was. She even said "can you beat a 3" Then she probably was so embarrassed after the fact and had a brain fart she didn't say it. Then stuck with some other story. He got mad. To me it was as clear as day she misread her hand. I have done it in the past. Once I thought I had quad 66s when all I had was 55 and I played it like I had it and got a player to fold. I show my high hand quads only to realized I didn't have quads and started laughing with my head on the table. I even flipped my cards up as someone said "you hit the high hand" and I was about to say "yea". So he needs to get over it. His behavior was inexcusable. He is a pro. He is rich. Has he ever made an apology? OBVIOUS she misread her hand. Anyways...... Hustler Casino made a business move. He is not good for business. So they didn't let him on the show. We are in a crazy world of any wrong doing can ruin your popularity on social networks even if it's a lie and you have to unscrew the situation. Once the damage is done, it is hard to undo. Depp is an example. Didn't get cast until that divorce trial ended and the truth got out. No one likes Ezra Miller due to his antics from mental illness Everyone loves Jason Mamoa. Aquaman was just an ok movie - made a mountain of money The Flash was a good movie - Just hit the 1/2 way mark to break even.
If I remember correctly. During the game, one player asked robbie if she has a 3. Which she replied "No. this is pure bluffcatcher" She later changed her narrative to misreas her hand during the post game interview.
@@yrag89 I rewatched it because I didn't remember her saying that originally, and it sounds like someone asked "Do you have pocket 3s?" to which she responded "No, this is a pure bluff catcher." At no point did she say "Can you beat a 3?" I agree, this story about misreading her hand was after the fact. I vaguely recall something like that.
The river jam is a mistake, what can homie have that would call and GA beats? That is the worst card in the deck. This has to be a check and work backward
I don't miss him in the slightest. Wanting or not wanting certain players in the game is not or shouldn't be up to him. Hustler have virtually said as much, hence he doesn't play there
What a stupid nit roll. You only lose to 88. Garrett is super agro and he could be bluffing. He could have a straight, a flush going for value. I don’t fault Garrett for jamming because he knows his image.
YES, I AGREE WE MISS HIM. BUT, I DON'T HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT HIM RETURN MONEY. SO, HE DONE ! IT ONLY ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND SOMETHING. GARRETT CAN MAKE IT BACK WITH IN HOURS.
I don't miss Garrett. I think his behavior in the Robbi incident was deplorable, and bad for poker in general. We should be encouraging amateurs to play, at whatever stakes they are willing to play at.
He loses to more hands than it seems, lets see you have 70 grand on the table and snap call an all in when you're behind a few hands. The one remaining combo of Pocket jacks and pocket queens (plus pocket 8s) would play the hand the same way when they fill up on the river. Anyone shoving a flush on a paired board would be an idiot so considering a bigger boat for all your chips is reasonable for these stakes.
Well, That was an ugly river. I still have to beliveve I am good here much of the time. I am a tight player but I have to keep betting i I were Garrett.
Just dropped in to say that I don't really miss Garrett all that much, thought I would. Good player but I find the dynamics of the games much more interesting now without him.
Whoever made the thumbnail for this video missed an opportunity to have Garrett dabbing his tears with hundred dollar bills. Easily five times more funny appealing and clickable.
No, we don't miss him one single bit. We just wish Garrett well on his fatherhood journey and hope he's a better parent than he was after losing to Robbie 😂🎉🙌
Fun to watch Garrett? Rarely. More fun to watch games without Garrett. But I could watch the Robbi hand 1000 times, Garrett was fun to watch in that one. Then he let it destroy his career by asking for the money back, and doubling down in 10 different ways after that. Narcissist be gone! Good riddance.
Minority opinion here but I don’t miss him - he always seemed like a moralistic phony to me before the J2 scandal and his response to that has made him completely unpalatable to me now.
@@johnbrandon94016 disagree. when someone betted without looking at the cards, it was crazy and lucky. she betted because she is crazy!!! not cheating.
@@aheroictaxidriver3180Shut up simp. Never in my life have I seen somebody call that huge amount of money with J4 as a bluff catcher, let alone from a social player. Too good to be true, 100 procent cheating. The fact that she gave him the money back right away is a huge red flag. If I really won in an honest way, I wouldn’t return a single penny even if my life depended on it. But she knew she was in deep waters where she didn’t belong. Also, she did mention that she thought he had A high, so why would you call with J high?
Bullies have no place in poker, Garrett is a bad actor. He made HCL boring and unwatchable. 9/10o on that board at the river is destroyed by any of the flop and turn calling range the flopped straight is against. I find that often a flopped straight is never good at the river when my first 2 street bets are called and the river flushes and boats out. This hand shows how wrong people are thinking Garrett is a great player, he donk jammed the river like he donked to Robbie while holding 8 high and claiming he was cheated.
