Why You NEED a DRIVER (for hacking games) 

ok

ok

Before we continue guess which sponsor I won’t buy from and will skip.

windows sucks because if something go wrong in the kernel the system just dies, in linux the system survives way more to even severe kernel faults. windows is a weak system that if one thing goes wrong, all the rest break together.

It would be great if Brilliant actually adhered to GDPR instead of just invading your privacy

or kernel level hacks rofl

@@DiamondBroPlayz has been done and is being sold for multiple years now, still detectable and detected numerous times.

@@rengomero1576 oof

@@DiamondBroPlayz that's how all Valorant hacks are, although I'd never recommend installing an unknown kernal level hack

@@MartianV2GG "kernal"

Windows rivals

Maybe shouldn't have cheated

@@UNTHESUNTHESUNTHES whos saying I have they are just malware at this point a full on invasion of privacy and windows was bad enough that you have to take this stuff out of it and now games need this too

Always have been, actually

thats....the entire point, to spy on your machine to try and make sure your not cheating, and there is no reason to get upset at the anti cheats, they would all vanish if cheating wasn't a problem in games, they just add extra development time and cost, but cheating is such a problem in online games nowadays that that extra cost is near mandatory for your game to be playable

did you know 1.93% of all QR-Codes are rickrolls

A true hero

You poor soul.

Thx, i couldnt be bothered grabbing my phone in the next room

When I scanned it, it only went to youtube's main page, hmm... I got lucky lol.

...that is why you disable the anticheats and create your own cheats.

I trust them to run on a separate hard drive with a separate windows install, for anything that isn't gaming i don't see a point ever using windows.

Why wouldn't you trust an anti cheat 💀

@@theFishy_ why would you?

@@theFishy_ how can you trust they dont take your data, same with cheats you dont make.

too bad it will make more invasive software because of you

@@handlesrtwitterdontbelivethem It's actually not invasive because it will fight the already existing invasive software.

@@reidafesta9131 and i will fight the existing soul you have

@@handlesrtwitterdontbelivethem but can they go higher than the Kernel?

@@kajojo2399 yes sir all security in computing can be defeated by a gods computer that changes 0s and 1s nobody can defeat the 0 and 1 find find

Any other subjects of game hacking you're interested in?

or maybe they don't want you/us to learn easily what they learned that spend so much time and effort yk.

You...are...videos 🎉

@@tim.martin Check out mine!

Man, he really is the videos ✊✊

just asked a taxi driver he said he works all day.

@@robsonrobbi1763 💀

@@robsonrobbi1763 i can't tell if you're serious or not but you're supposed to ask a truck driver, DUH!

@@lucaslindgren3237 i am very serious person.

@@robsonrobbi1763 can he work for me?

I dont believe any kernel to be well known by a single person lmao. Well, any kernel that is as large as the windows/linux kernel in scope.

the windows kernel for a previous version of windows NT is completely decompiled afaik its called the windows research kernel. so if you consider decompiled as "well understood" then there's that, but for comprehension-wise, sid6645 is more correct

You're correct. I recently found a Poker Cheating Bot that does exactly this, using ML and mouse inputs.

Pretty sure smurfing is just when you are skilled at a game but make a new account to play with/against lower skilled players temporarily.

@@itsv1p3r he's saying they think it is smurfing but it is actually machine learning bots (which is ridiculous they have only recently had any traction) as an occasional smurf myself in OW1 back in the day (peaked GM hitscan, if I play in anything below master it is unfair, it is not really that fun for me. But sometimes I would help friends rank up or whatever. It loses its charm fast but later on I was coaching so I would play with lower ranked players and even when not trying to specifically win just me being in the game tilts the balance significantly) I can tell you most of them were boosting or toxic, but they are real people. When you are one you know the other ones usually. So I do not think 'smurfs' are just robots, its literally toxic high ranked people who are for whatever reason either being paid to boost accounts or just want to sh on bad players. But when I do play seriously in a very low ranked game (if i am boosting a friend I obviously want to win) it does absolutely look like I am cheating sometimes but usually you can tell the difference because the way I would play was not, like, overly risky. Cheaters who were taking it seriously would bring a duo to protect/pocket them to stop people like me from being able to counter them (playing a oneshot hero counters a cheater if you can hit shots). But if you can't even try to hit a shot then they will always win. Almost beat a cheater who got to 4900 SR or something because he was braindead and would just run into the open and aimbot everyone on soldier. But they had a dva pocket so by the end of the match I could not even try to kill him and it was a waste of time. It is really discouraging, because a smurf you can learn from, when I was getting better I did pay attention to how they played and adapted (later on it was nice finding the same people and destroying them in return :) really felt like I had made progress improving, seeing an account a year later that had ruined my day playing far worse than me). iirc there was actually one bot in Overwatch and it was kind of funny, but it was pretty clearly not human and not very good. They also streamed it live. That was years ago so I am sure things have improved, but to make a truly human-like bot, well, the decisions AI or machine learning make is sometimes really weird in a competitive format. Something is always really off. Apparently they are getting very good, but the hope is that anti-cheats will use the same techniques in reverse. I don't know what that will say for false positives.

AIMr does this for free

this is to make sure you're not rigging your install to allow you to cheat before you boot up the game

@@xman10110 It also makes sure that any exploit in the anticheat software can be utilized by bad actors to do much worse things than cheating in a videogame.

cough cough *vanguard* cough cough

@@somdudewillson what would stop said bad actors from doing that while the game is running? having it run 24/7 is no more a security risk then having it run AT ALL

@@flamingscar5263 well imagine you play that game only like once a month and a zeroday in the anti-cheat is revealed while you were not playing

@georgedick1521 neka what???

Why would it avoid hwid bans💀 Maybe for the PC that the cheat is running on, but the other one where the game is running is still gonna be banned lol

@@Nioxs I’m not sure that’s why I’m asking. But if the memory is being read from a 3rd party device then it wouldn’t affect the main PC, no?

@@Karltyyy lmfao

@@Karltyyy It affects the PC where you play the game and start the AntiCheat

@@Karltyyy DMA allows you to bypass the need to read from memory locally, but you still need to write to memory for most cheat features. Most ACs will also be able to tell that you have a device installed and that might triggler flags. Also has nothing to do with avoiding HWID bans, just reduces detection vectors, if you get banned you're still HWID banned (there are other ways around this, just not DMA).

Those kind of things already exist and can be readily bought.

AIMr, its free and does this

He's indeed a great source of information for game hacking and allaround

or just patch the anticheat

@@Nickjack0310 ???? LOL

@@Nickjack0310 sure, but that is a much much harder task and would require far more moving parts in your program to circumvent the anticheat. the idea of not doing this is so that your cheat is efficient and as light weight as possible. some games ac is easier to "patch" but other more popular games require a lot of reverse engineering on the ac and i mean a *lot*

You dont need to make the rasp invisible, just connect it with usb cable and make it seem like elgato streamdeck or something else

@@ashxxiv better than ???? LOL guy

🤓

@@jordan13377 👺

Why would you even start?

​​@@Mart-E12 Cuz its fun and you learn a lot about the windows api and how games work

👍

"undetectable" -> This isn't true [anymore]. VGK and ESEA have proven, that you can easily detect DMA these days. Even with custom firmware.

@@ting1561 Define easily, because in the end of the day all it can do is try to parse known signatures of access, if i make a cheat and don't publish it's truly indetectable, DMA tracking is tricky as FUCK, and theoretically all you would need to do to write your own driver is to pay microshit to sign a buggy code like with VMWARE, or buy a driver exploit for a device you own, Heck, write your code to use the video card as DMA then it's a complete and absolute clusterfuck madness blackhole to try to block the cheat.

@@fss1704 Couldn't have said it better. Infact one of my favorite ways to access memory and bypass Anti-cheat doesn't even require DMA. You can use something like CosMapper to just manually map your driver before you launch the game. Works like a charm

@@adversemiller sweet, didn't knew this tool, i have a pc with a compromised intel me that was a legend reverse engineering hacks, watch god mode unlocked to have a grasp, used to cheat very well, just small fov aimhelp and triggerbot with esp invisible to the software, i exfiltrated the esp box data trough pci slot like i was using a gpio and the o.s. had absolutely no clue that there was anything connected, i used a bluepill to draw the esp boxes on top of a vga signal.

What are you doing, though

@D: I'm currently learning C language and then transitioning to C+ for development.

@@reverenddick8562 do you mean c++

@Realm Slayer yes, or CPP, as I've also seen it.

@@reverenddick8562 okay because I was a little bit confused when you said C+

Faceit Anticheat is almost as bad as vac. I remember back in the day almost every cheat available worked on vac and faceit.

it is better than matchmaking though, but i get your point hell i cheated in faceit with a free shit built in java paste that barely worked but account never got beaned

@@assssss3661 - 🤡🤡

No, AFAIK the proton version of eac is much less potent because, linux being a bit more secure than windows, it simply won't allow it to run in kernel mode.

Problem with linux is that you can just make a patch for your own kernel or anyone can modify it. Thats why no anticheat support.

​@@iwky1930 problem for enforcing anticheat on someone elses pc perhaps, great for using your own pc the way you want to though...

@@johanngambolputty5351 well yea i meant it as a problem in the case of anticheat support.

problem is that anticheat developers are control whores, linux can't run anticheat on root level only user level unlike windows.

It was not countless leaks, iirc it was just one about the F-16. It was non-critical information and something some random enlisted probably knew and had access to on something that wasn't SIPRNET. I have a lot of documents about the planes I flew on (Far more sensitive than the F-16) that are unclassified, but the general public doesn't really have access to them easily because they are part of our training, and what the public has is just generalized information. I have talked with some cheat devs of very expensive paid hacks and they are very talented people. Much more talented than the average pixelbot writer. You can tell the difference in class, it's like a drug dealer vs. the drug lord. They are able to get around anticheats long before anyone else and able to keep it updated, somehow. Their value becomes less and less useful as the anticheat is compromised, and this was the case for Overwatch, which started out having a decent anticheat (it stopped most memory cheats, which were the most dangerous for that game, where most things were server side, so most things could not be touched), but Blizzard neglected it and since it was in-house, it was fairly obfuscated but only got easier and easier to defeat. Most of the lower tier cheaters who sell stuff include malware (hwid spoofers are almost always malware for some unsuspecting kid) and they tend to be really dumb and scammers, who steal other people's cheats and resell them with some minor modifications. Many cheaters that do not develop are also very talented because they too enjoy reversing. It was annoying I had to do all this in secret despite myself never cheating because learning about these things was very informative for what was really possible, and what was out there; and what to look out for. I also forwarded cheats to Blizzard's line quite often but I doubt it made a difference. The community is very scummy and dangerous. Cheating is addictive like a drug if you lack empathy in some regard. But for every intelligent engineer and software dev (one I knew specifically would teach me how jank some of the worst cheats were) there are like 100 kiddos and scammers or more, treating it like a business, or trying to get people to do things for them for free while they do not care to learn anything. at some point in time many people need a lockpicker... someone has to be able to do it. There are also grey hats who go for reward money in return for finding exploits. It is a very interesting dynamic and I found cheaters to be interesting people. At the end of the day, though, the majority of them are ruining these games and often for very stupid reasons (everyone else is cheating is a common one by people coping they are bad).

@@felicitycno, there are at least three. One was on the specifications of some Chinese tank shell, don’t remember what the third one was.

Wdym now? Esp was literally something you could download for free in cod 2

The Windows kernel is a collection of multiple files and dynamic libraries and it is not modifiable since it is closed-source so modifying the kernel itelf is not viable and as a addition there are many counter measures to programs trying to modify any kernel driver or the kernel itself like Windows Patchguard

Anyone who doesn't have a problem with a piece of software they are forced to have running all the time at one of the most privileged levels in a computer OS, just quite simply either doesn't understand Computers or is a fucking idiot.

Let natural selection do its thing... :)

How does the installation process even happen on Windows?

Game genie basically. Thing is, legitimate peripherals are registered and have officially assigned identifiers. Now you can forge one of those, so automatics may not pick it up, but if enough sightings of an unusual device ID get associated with reported cheating, manual review is just going to get it flagged as a malicious peripheral. There are really only two ways around kernel monitoring. Either switch your memory injector's ID frequently enough that it doesnt get intercepted, or run the entire kernel in a virtual environment, and modify memory from outside the scope of its virtual kernel. This can go as far as airgap isolation and hardware debugging feom a second compuiter. At that point becomes impossible to detect the memory modification, and anti cheat has to fall back on reviewing performance, most likely with machine learning algorithms.

i think “most replayed” = “most skipped to”, so that makes perfect sense

bro do yk how to bypass eac

@@meth6922 what you want to if you want bypass it?

There's two sides of it, making them and using them. Making them is largely a "To see if I can, for the challenge" kind of thing, using them is likely more for attention and power fantasy and such. Yuh.

"I want the numbers that go along with being good at the game without putting in the effort to learn how to be good at the game."

sometimes games can get boring

In Proton anticheat don't run at all.

@@mik11112 it runs when it runs, thats what. i've played brawlhala(EAC), and dying light(vac) and those run, however many others don't.

@@mik11112 Not true. Many anti cheat software versions work just fine.

Of course, it does, for the system running in user mode is more secure. On Linux, running it as root or in the kernel makes little sense. Unlike on Windows, the user has full control over the operating system. Even an anti cheat operating on a kernel level can be defeated with a patched kernel, which would not be detectable. The situation is kind of similar to hiding magisk root on android, detecting it really does not work well through traditional means.

@@notjustforhackers4252 kernel-level anti-cheats for Windows don't work in proton though, but many user-space anti-cheats for Windows do

network traffic is encrypted

You either didn't watch the video, have a horrible understanding of English, or you were pile drive'd onto your head when you were an infant, and they decided to use your soft spot for chip condiments just to get something useful from you.

@cledtz 1. Well, the kernel is used to communicate with the drivers, and ? If your telling me that you need drivers to run a game - then we totally agree, but why would you make an video about it. Did you try to run a game without drivers :DD:D? Its clearly not going to run. You gave some examples but why ? What did it changed ? 3. I guess your the one who is not informed enough, I can hack a game right from the source code, I can change the game files of the game without running it , I can write some code that will change the way the game is played WITHOUT ANY OF THESE DRIVERS THAT ARE NEEDED TO RUN THIS GAME. What hacking are we talking about ? If the game is Online I can hack the database etc. Dude I think you should read alot more about game hacks and how they are made.And I would be careful with your language bcs the only stupid comment here is yours.

@@patrickslomian7423 excuse me but you don't have any idea what you're talking about.

@@foksha8278 thank you for your opinion, how many games did you Hack ?

@@patrickslomian7423 Hacking a database is beyond game hacking. If you can hack any database, then hack my youtube account😂 stop your nonsense🤡

lol public driver is gonna suck balls

if you still need this, no you shouldn't since it is directly operating on the kernel