Keep in mind that the powers of Hindsight do not exist when you're actively involved in a hand. Sure, you can easily judge how I played my hands after I reveal what my opponents are holding, but the same can not be said when you're facing the pressure of a timed game and the desire to want to win a hand. You can only go by the best decision you can make at the time given your limited information. Please also keep in mind that I play in a deep stack game, so opening ranges are completely different than your standard 100 Big Blind game. I'm providing free entertainment and education, so if you like what you see, please Like my content, Subscribe to my channel, and Comment below anything you'd want to see in the future or have us change in our video editing format. Any interaction at all helps push the RU-vid algorithm to spread my videos further.
Thank you so much for your support! My wife and I will try to get more videos out as fast as possible. I have video footage for 8 videos lined up with audio finished for 4, but editing takes a long time.
I thought about it, but at this point, with how much time my wife has put into figuring all of this stuff out, I think I have less odds than hitting a one-outter of getting away with doing something like that without getting choked out...
I like that you have a game plan ahead of time Qd9d hand even though I thought your trips were good you still considered all of the possible hands and what you would do if you got raised large, very nice! I’m learning (I’m about 3 or 4 weeks in playing cash games and I like it 😁), thanks for sharing!
i like the review of the last hand, i wouldve 100% called there. but you folded for a good reason. bad implied odds + ur most likely behind. good laydown
@@AeroPlaysPoker when you're recording on an iphone you just press and hold the area that you want to focus lock. a yelow square will come up and it will say something like AE/AF LOCK
If I was to hire a poker coach, I'd consider ya. I like how you do the hand breakdowns. You add in things like player history. You adjust your play depending on whether the table is tight or loose. Maybe if ya can't quite get the channel to 3k followers as fast as you'd like, maybe ya might consider it...
@AeroPlaysPoker No....I cut my poker teeth long ago at Foxwoods. I'm not sure if it's changed I haven't played live since Covid but I've been told it's softer in Vegas. That whole strip from Atlantic City up to Boston is nothing but grinders.
My VPIP is probably pretty low... What people that watch too much live stream don't understand is that live poker pros spend most of their time folding, and this is even more true now that I've started making these videos. K-10 in any position other than on the button in a limped pot? Instant fold. I rather play 5-6 or 5-7 suited. I rarely run into kicker issues. That's not to say that I'm a knit or never bluff. I just don't play mediocre hands.
With the A9 hand a smooth call would of been a good shout, maybe you would of got 1 more stab from the villain and then perhaps you could of done a small raise at the end which he may of called? Then again, maybe from the next card, he would have just checked/folded.
@AeroPlaysPoker tbh, this is the first time I'm learning about this. What's the strategy and significance behind this sliding scale sizing? I can understand from a positional perspective, but I would love to hear more of your thoughts.
@@iviadiviax get a feel for your table. Raise bigger on looser tables to shorten how many callers get. It also makes your range of hands unpredictable if sometimes you have 7-8 suited for a $25 raise and other times it's a hand like Queens
@@SketchyPoker Thank you! If the guy had air, I don't think he's betting any river anyways. On the other hand, if he had a big Ace, 99, or .001% or the time 22, I wanted to get it all in by the river.
I'm really surprised to hear you make a math error. At 15:00 When you have to call 900 and the pot is 3700, you're putting in 900 to win a pot of 3700, not a pot of 4600. You can't include your call when you're calculating the odds TO call. So you'd be getting just over 4:1 on your call. Now I don't think it's a very bad call with the OESD - although 5c might be bad, and a Tx isn't really as good for you as you would hope... I mean I probably call there because I'm not that good but just sayin, the math is wrong.
I haven’t made it to that point. But if the pot is 3700 and the bet was 900 your call does count in the odds of what you could win. The WIN will be 4600. You call counts as part of the pot.
@@somepeoplecanthandlethetruth So if we're flipping a coin, and I offer you fifty cents for your dollar if it is heads, you definitely should call since you're getting 1.50 when you win? The odds are 1:1 and by your logic the payout is 3:2 so it's a 100% call all day!
4:1 on your call is the same as saying 1 in 5, which is 20%. There is no math error. It's two different ways of saying the same thing. In your calculation, you are saying you can eat 4 slices of pie if you win, and lose one slice of pie if you lose, aka 4 to 1. In my calculation, I am saying I only need to risk my one slice of pie to take down the entire pot of 5 slices of pie, which will indeed be $4600 when the pot is calculated and pushed to me. You are saying I need to risk 900 for a net gain of 3700. I am saying I need to risk 900 for a gross gain of 4600. It's the same thing said two different ways. When calculating odds in terms of percentages, you DO include the cost of your call into the main pot, just as you need to include your slice of the pie into the main pie, because the math needs to add up to 100% aka the whole pie. 🥧
Here, it is actually YOUR calculation which is incorrect in your example. The pot will indeed be $1.50, but the risk is NOT 1:1. In your example, the $1 is two slices of pie that you risk to win 1 slice of pie. Your win odds would be 50%, but you'd be risking 67% of the pot, since 100 into 150 is 67%, thus making it a bad call.
@@magiciangob I’ll simply, if pre-flop 3 players put in a $100 each you have exactly $100 in front of you and you make the call and are all in. You win the pot and stack your chips, how much will you have?
the 67s hand only has 15% odds against sets and straight as the hand played, and drawing dead against a higher flush. The only case you have more than 20% odds is you against a set and an over pair. Seems a negative EV call considering all those 3 scenarios.
@@SketchyPoker Gambler's high 😅 I'm still stacking chips from the massive win. I have a tendency to make more mistakes when I'm still high from a big previous hand.
Thanks for all the hard effort you do to make this content 👏 I'd like to improve my game but my bankroll isn't the best I don't make alot of money and if I save up a good enough bankroll it can take me atleast 6months I'd like to play as much hands as I can to get more experience, I hear that online is the way to start up But since these California laws suck and can't play$$, I seen some vloggers they post up that club GG THEY they have a secret room you can play tournaments and small stakes cash ,where would I find this
I wouldn't know. I'm a live cash player. I've played all over both nothern and southern California though. Tons of card rooms available from Capital, Stones, and Thunder Valley in the North down to Commerce Casino, The Bike, and Hustler in the south. You also have Lucky Chances and Bay 101 in the Bay Area.
OJ was guilty as any person in history. Blackboy. He even wrote a book about how he done it. And lost the civil case. He didn’t get convicted but letting him go free was cheaper than riots and looting. But this is a fantastic poker vlog not a true crime vlog.
Oh you mean when I had Aces full of 9's? Yes, you're technically correct. Although in a 2-5 game with a 1500 capped buy in, I can't say it's a very common play for someone to 3-bet with pocket 2's. 😅 I mean anything's possible, but I try to cater my thoughts towards the plausible as opposed to the possible. But I wish my opponent really did have pocket 2's!
Hrm, I've watched a couple episodes of this Poker Beast, and I'm completely baffled by the comparison. He's a white guy, much younger than me, and plays 1-3 with a $300 buy in. I'm Asian and play 2-5 in Las Vegas with a $1500 buy in. There's almost no similarity at all. 😅
I get the circumstances behind the hand, but it is funny that you called 1 million blinds with seven high all in, but then we’re talking about “player of my caliber” lol
The math is explained why I made the call with 7-high 😅 My calls with draws are almost always mathematical, based on what my opponents are most likely holding. I folded my 4-7 of spades flush draw for only $115 based on implied odds.
So far I've noticed you only show winning hands and when you smash the board.. anyone can win when you get the cards, have the nuts or don't have hard decisions.. The reason Mariano is liked is because he teaches you the thought process while In hard positions and shows you when he gets lucky or the massive losses.. You can't win'3m all like Poker Beast who only lasted a year because he showed how awesome he was when he hit the good cards.. we all know you are a grinder.. but we are looking to see a fyll spectrum of ups and downs and card dead tines and when to pick your bluffs because youre card dead and strategy on tells,.. do you ever plan to show your face and personality or are you jist going to read from the script like bradowen.. which is fine i guess? But why have a vlog if you're so successful at poker? Fame? You want to be like rampage,Mariano,brad? And be invited to live streams? You have to show your face on Livestream and you're not willing to show your face?? So it's just really weird and mechanical... I like it , i like your show because I'm a rec player attempting to go pro when I feel I have a proper bankroll, and sufficient skill.... I guess im confused on your intent... Are you here to teach poker for free?? There has to be objectives so we can connect on a better with your audience like rec players like me .
I show both winning and losing hands as long as there is anything to be learned from them. I only have two videos released so far, so it's hard to make an assumption that I only show winning hands. I'm pretty sure in my first video, I show nothing but losing hands at first before I finally make a recovery with the QQ hand. Pretty sure I was down $575 in the first hour and a half. Please continue to keep watching and I'm sure you'll run into plenty of losing hands that I discuss. Although I do also recall folding my very last hand of AJ in the first video. I don't go deep into the explanation that time though because I use it as a cliff hanger leading into the second video. If you look at the one Short I currently have out, you'll see that I experience VERY few session losses though, so there's a whole lot more winning hands to show than losing ones. As for my motivation for these vlogs, it's the same as most RU-vidrs! The same thing we do every day, Pinky. Try and take over the world!
This guy is just a hater because he's lackin brother. Ive seen all the vlogs and this is my instant favorite. Cant wait to see more! You're giving away all the secrets though lmao😂@AeroPlaysPoker
@Ant5632 Wow, thank you so much for the incredible compliment! 🥰 We'll try our best to keep up with your expectations! What other poker vlogs do you watch?
A9s: Technically 22 is not completely dead. It has 1 out. I think a smaller raise, maybe just a call, would have been better. Villain can't have too many hands that are going to call a big x-raise, other than exactly 22 or 99. ATo: If you only get called by better (no matter the bet size), you have permission to bet any two cards. QQ: "I'm happy to get it all in with him" - completely forgetting about the original raiser, who can still come over the top. 76hh: You didn't have anywhere near 13 - 15 outs. 88: What would you expect to fold when you bet just over pot (that won't fold to a smaller bet) when the river is a complete brick?
May, on 7,6s... if he did not have anywhere near 13-15 outs, how many outs did he have and is the difference of actual outs negligible in the amount of equity needed to justify the call? I guess what I'm saying is, does his math check out on the reason for the call and are you splitting hairs here with the outs comment. Your thoughts?
@@MattNunez89 Against one player I don't think it should affect his play much, but against 2 players who are VERY interested in the pot, both of them going all in as if hero doesn't even matter, hero could be drawing completely dead vs a made straight and bigger flush draw. Assuming he has an AMAZING combo draw I think was a huge mistake when both players still in the hand are pretty much saying f*** you.
@@MaydayAggroI think you're ignoring the proper context though. You're making it seem like when the turn comes the BB went all in, original raiser also shoves, and Aero calls. I would agree with you if that were the case and im going to bet that Aero would as well and would have folded to two shoves on the turn. But that's not how the hand played out. The BB checked, original raiser bet $400, Aero calls, BB shoves, original raiser shoves, and now Aero is making a decision on how much more he has to put in in relation to the pot and how much equity he has. With his equity, how can you say that risking $900 to win $4,600 is anywhere near a bad play?
@@MattNunez89 Pot size to call size: 4600 to 900. Remaining cards to total outs: 46 to 9. Pot odds: 3700 to 900, Odds to improve: 37 to 9. Right at indifference. Considering the pot size is actually slightly under 4600, it's technically a slightly bad play. "Well we didn't have to call all of that at once." No, but it all went in, so calling 400 then 500 is the same as calling 900.
@@MaydayAggro appreciate your feedback. Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts. Just trying to be a sponge and soak all points of view up
