Тёмный

Why Your Decisions Are Meaningless And Choice Is An Illusion - Today's Topic 

Cracked
Подписаться 2,7 млн
Просмотров 976 тыс.
50% 1

SUBSCRIBE HERE: goo.gl/ITTCPW
Why do people even argue about this?
CLICK HERE for more INTERNET PARTY - goo.gl/u7DWFM
CLICK HERE for more ROM.COM SEASON 2 - goo.gl/hAi0RY
CLICK HERE for more ROM.COM SEASON 1 - goo.gl/dWNuKx
CLICK HERE For more AFTER HOURS: goo.gl/Nrg6Jh
CLICK HERE For the CinemaSins Team-Up Playlist: goo.gl/6Fr465
WATCH every episode of STARSHIP ICARUS here - goo.gl/21RejZ
See more www.cracked.com
LIKE us on: / cracked
FOLLOW us on: / cracked
FOLLOW us on: / cracked

Приколы

Опубликовано:

 

25 июн 2015

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 4,5 тыс.   
@SultenZone
@SultenZone 8 лет назад
It's kinda scary how simultaneously, 'Acted Katie' is trying to prove that free will exists by moving freely, stating that no one can control her, but we all know that's just part of the script.
@dahelmang
@dahelmang 8 лет назад
+SultenZone But if she chooses to rebel, will she be fired?
@shill1444
@shill1444 8 лет назад
That is so meta but yes. lol
@Zandonus
@Zandonus 8 лет назад
+s Hill they could have broken the 4th wall about it, and still manage to explain the argument- like "I was reading the script that said: Burst into dance after partner says bla bla, and then she just says "I just won't do it, while mentioning the script, as if predetermination is still not real" And still not get fired, thus being predetermined to wiggle her way out of being fired while making clever use of free will?
@shill1444
@shill1444 8 лет назад
You're right! That's where I thought they were going. lol
@mysimpletoon
@mysimpletoon 8 лет назад
+SultenZone Woah.
@davidroberts1689
@davidroberts1689 8 лет назад
The Ancient Greeks used to say, even if you are not responsible for your actions you should act like it.
@Frivolitility
@Frivolitility 8 лет назад
The ironic thing is we have no choice but to act like we have a choice.
@phoenixsr2241
@phoenixsr2241 7 лет назад
They totally didn't cover that in this video. You and your thoughts are soooo original.
@alphabetApperatus
@alphabetApperatus 7 лет назад
Phoenix SR someone sounds a little sour. ur mom not give u a kiss before she left the house?
@danieltaylor5371
@danieltaylor5371 7 лет назад
Whats the deal with people acting like, for the lack of a better phrase, little bitches on comment pages? mr phoenixsr sounds so cranky he has to belittle someone in order to feel a fraction better about himself. stop the hate
@tsanjoubrahma7763
@tsanjoubrahma7763 7 лет назад
he was predetermined to act like a little bitchly
@Unhacker
@Unhacker 6 лет назад
"Look at your liver!" is something I really need to work into more conversations.
@kurtfeierabend1206
@kurtfeierabend1206 3 года назад
Gotta do it right: "Look at you Liver. LOOK AT IT!" Timing is everything.
@AnnoyingMoose
@AnnoyingMoose 3 года назад
She looked towards where her liver was when he said that but if she had actually seen her liver at that point (instead of her clothes covering her skin covering her liver) the conversation would have been drastically different from that point onwards!
@Artist452
@Artist452 2 года назад
I just woke up from this crazy dream. I chose to order a refrigerated track of beer and destroyed my liver. Then, I put on rabbit ears, ran through the building at work in my under ware and got fired. Hypothetically, if freewill existed I might have done that.
@azam148
@azam148 5 лет назад
I wish I had a friend with whom I can have such convos. Most ppl are just boring.
@gaming2top759
@gaming2top759 5 лет назад
Boring and stupid just like me and you
@justxfitness6417
@justxfitness6417 5 лет назад
Azam M email me
@dialatedmcd
@dialatedmcd 4 года назад
I'm the exception.
@freethinker3083
@freethinker3083 4 года назад
Let’s all exchange emails and have group messages! 😁
@justxfitness6417
@justxfitness6417 4 года назад
Unique Mitchell u got twitter or IG? I'm wit it just don't wanna put my email here lol
@zacharylahana2883
@zacharylahana2883 9 лет назад
REALITY IS AN ILLUSION THE UNIVERSE IS A HOLOGRAM BUY GOLD BYEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@XFIGHTER715
@XFIGHTER715 9 лет назад
dammit bill
@cindirose3390
@cindirose3390 9 лет назад
Zachary Lahana Is the gold a hologram? It sure does not feel like a hologram when I count out my cash to buy gold. Did you really mean that reality stuff? Are you just playing with words?
@zacharylahana2883
@zacharylahana2883 9 лет назад
That's it. You're all grounded. Go to your room and watch the entire Gravity Falls series, and come out once you've learned your lesson.
@russellmcrae247
@russellmcrae247 9 лет назад
Nice reference
@jackieboyborden
@jackieboyborden 9 лет назад
Freewill exists in the freedom to pursue your will, but you will never act out of your own will. Every decision you make is one that you would make, you can't decide something you wouldn't decide.
@VendErre
@VendErre 9 лет назад
Hey that's pretty good. You must Thelema.
@dation0000
@dation0000 9 лет назад
Jack Borden stop fucking my brain it hurts
@AntiGravityC9
@AntiGravityC9 9 лет назад
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
@tmntsuperhiros
@tmntsuperhiros 9 лет назад
Do you mean based on a person's personality? What is the thing or force that drives what an individual's will is? And if every individual will is different what evolutionary function does it serve?
@roygbiv176
@roygbiv176 9 лет назад
Jack Borden Hobbes
@dogstar7925
@dogstar7925 7 лет назад
"The chemistry kit that is earth plus millions of years equals magic" Perfect
@theobserver314
@theobserver314 4 года назад
Long answer: 0:00 Short answer: "Reality is an illusion the universe is a hologram, Buy gold bye!" ~ Bill Cipher
@occamsrazor1285
@occamsrazor1285 8 лет назад
the lack of free will doesn't mean the release from responsibility
@Johntub3
@Johntub3 8 лет назад
+Occams Razor Well, it does and it doesn't. You can punish people for commiting crimes for pragmatic reasons, like protecting society, What you cannot rightfully do is find people responsible for their actions. Criminals are ultimately not responsible for their actions as they were determined to commit crimes they cannot be found responsible for as they were boud to commit them by the mix of internal and external causes. They had no choice. But you can still punish them for doing so to maintain relative order. But then again, there is no ultimate morality, or point in living anyway. that's why I find modern western naturalism depressing.
@Johntub3
@Johntub3 8 лет назад
***** You can, because someone has to keep those rottenn apples away from the rest of society. And that someone doesn't really have a choice.
@Johntub3
@Johntub3 8 лет назад
***** Yeah, that's pretty much the epitomy of post-modern materialistic humanism. Thre is no absolute sence of justice or morality. Heck, there is no free will to begin with. Our existence is but one insanely improbable accident. Thre is no reason, no purpose, thre is no use. All we have is here and now so let's eat, drink and fuck with no regards to long-term concequences of our actions for tomorow we die. It is rather depressing if you just think about it.
@Johntub3
@Johntub3 8 лет назад
***** I know. Calvinists as a wing of evangelical movement presuppose determinism. Islam is completely deterministic belief system. It is clear that we are making our choices for a reason. thre is concrete relation between cause and effect. It would be absurd to assume otherwise. When you are making a choice, you are determined by mix of countless internal and external factors (including emotions such as hatred) and reductionist would probably say it all goes down to collisions of subatomic particles. But I believe that although you are determined by mix of factors, you are not predetermined to decide either way. In some intuitive decisions you might be, but that's beside my point. And due to quantum-mechanic nature of our universe there is really no way to disprooove the very possibility. (Well, it depends on what interpretation of quantum mechanics you prefer, but let's not get into that.) There is many definitions or "levels" of free will. The absolute free will would assume you are omniscient godlike figure, who knows everything and also knows every implication and aspect of either thinkable choice of each decision of Theirs. the lowest would be the sence, that you are not really deciding your own choices, but you bear the responsibiliy for your actions nonetheless. We are clearly not omniscient, but I'd like to believe we are making meaningfull choices nonetheless.
@deltax930
@deltax930 8 лет назад
+Jan Škopek Why can't you blame the individual? A person is just a sum of the things they were born with, have experienced and have done. If that sum of experience and genetics is a bad person then why can't I blame it/them. Sure they were 'destine' to make those choices, but the choices were theirs just the same.
@JcGross93
@JcGross93 8 лет назад
I like how people argue about things we can't prove, using arguments we can't prove either.
@eddieking2976
@eddieking2976 5 лет назад
Boss walks in: I was preordained to fire you two for goofing off.
@kamidarko
@kamidarko 8 лет назад
The only real answer to this question is, "It doesn't matter." The idea of free will or predetermination only exists in retrospect.
@amymcclenny5369
@amymcclenny5369 6 лет назад
Please explain. I understand the concept of the only real answer being "It doesn't matter." ... however, you lost me when you said that predetermination only exists in retrospect. Please explain.
@MultiMaikimaik
@MultiMaikimaik 6 лет назад
God DAMN! Well said! :D
@arx3516
@arx3516 6 лет назад
True.
@TomMerle
@TomMerle 5 лет назад
This is called 'apathism'-- I subscribe to it
@yourkingdomcomeyourwillbedone
@yourkingdomcomeyourwillbedone 5 лет назад
So did you "choose" to give up "choice"?
@BennysGamingAttic
@BennysGamingAttic 8 лет назад
I can predict the future...I'm going to post a comment on a cracked video on youtube.
@BennysGamingAttic
@BennysGamingAttic 8 лет назад
+Ben Anderson and a reply
@BennysGamingAttic
@BennysGamingAttic 8 лет назад
+Ben Anderson and I'm going to upvote my own comment
@TheKrensada
@TheKrensada 8 лет назад
+Ben Anderson or was it your destiny to do these things?
@JustChadC
@JustChadC 8 лет назад
+TheKrensada maybe it was not Not his free will but his predetermination not.
@couleurles337
@couleurles337 8 лет назад
+Ben Anderson I can predict the future too. Tomorrow the world will end.* *I didn't say I could accurately predict the future.
@pbldiaz28
@pbldiaz28 9 лет назад
Im all for philosophy, but some of your fans' heads might explode. You did a good job explaining it though, I'm down for the cracked school of philosophy
@GreenGearMood
@GreenGearMood 9 лет назад
pablo diaz You are a kisser of ass. One who does not yet realize he will never be rewarded for it.
@SinisterGrapefruit
@SinisterGrapefruit 9 лет назад
GreenGearMood You are an edgy edgemeister. One who does not yet realize your opinions are not universal, nor appreciated by anyone.
@GreenGearMood
@GreenGearMood 9 лет назад
SinisterGrapefruit How are you calling me edgy? In this, of ALL contexts? Think about it.
@GreenGearMood
@GreenGearMood 9 лет назад
Paradigm shift That's not what edgy means.
@gametv9on
@gametv9on 9 лет назад
GreenGearMood idiot xD
@creatureslim
@creatureslim 7 лет назад
"choice is just an illusion that we see when we look back down the road we have traveled" max payne
@JamenLS
@JamenLS 7 лет назад
I'm too high for this
@jpm199
@jpm199 4 года назад
Not enough
@Syrange13
@Syrange13 9 лет назад
My two cents: everything you just talked about is confined within the human mind. All the connections and contradictions that you bring up are the products of a very complicated bio-computer, that has evolved for one purpose only: reproduce. As soon as we try to back away from the human experience, philosophy becomes meaningless. The concept of free will is a human construct, that most likely loses its meaning when try to apply it to the grand scheme of the universe. The same applies to the laws that we base our logic on.
@TrindyForce
@TrindyForce 9 лет назад
Syrange13 Isn't that something they addressed themselves...
@VendErre
@VendErre 9 лет назад
Reading Christopher Hyatt, I presume?
@JoyMusic23
@JoyMusic23 9 лет назад
Syrange13 Most logical comment on the internet
@violetp642
@violetp642 9 лет назад
Syrange13 Why do you think that reproduction is the only purpose for which that very complicated bio-computer evolved?
@kagutsuchi969
@kagutsuchi969 9 лет назад
Adia Aira Because life itself is driven by reproduction. Every part of the body is evolved to better aid the survival of the creature reproducing. It's advantageous for the vessel to adapt continuously. Our social nature is merely as a result to ensure that more of our species can survive compared to the difficulty a human would have as a solitary animal. Consider if you will, bees. Several species of bee are solitary and because of that survival is purely determined by its ability to gather food and protect itself until it can reproduce. Colonies developed as a way to protect the individual among the numerous. So too has our bond developed through the evolution of apes. We produce massive amounts of oxytocin when we mate, in order to establish a bond between the mates, likewise with childbirth and even stroking an animal. We receive rushes of dopamine when we do something beneficial to our survival to program our responses in future to those stimuli. Our bodies crave salt because it is a rarity in the natural world and as an animal without tools it was necessary to actively seek out salty foods. We react to sour things because it was an indicator of spoiled food. When people yawn, others will as well, as a sympathetic response. When people vomit, others will as well, because if the food is poisoned it's beneficial to the group to purge it. When someone is afraid, chemicals are released in their sweat that causes others to become fearful. All of these things are simply to make sure that we survive to reproduce. Humans just have a better understanding of cause and effect, and as such we can calculate what is most beneficial in regard to the life we perceive. The human understanding of life is flawed by our own concepts that we attempt force reality to exist in. We are taught that life is subject to rules like needing money in order to clothe, feed or house ourselves, when in fact the only thing that makes that possible is us believing that money has any relevance to the universe. I can't fish, unless I have a piece of paper allowing me to. I can't walk the earth unless I have certain papers that allow me to cross imaginary lines we create in the dirt. I can't construct a home on land I do not have a piece of paper that says I'm allowed to by other humans. Yet no other animal needs to pay for its food, or its shelter. When they are hungry they eat, when they need to rest they construct their burrow or create a hollow in a tree. We created order out of reality and claimed immutably that is how life is. Though the point of addressing this, is to show that reality doesn't exist within the constraints we impose. We can appreciate our accomplishments, but the inevitable fact is, our existence is merely an extension to pass on our genetics in order to survive.
@WillieJeng
@WillieJeng 9 лет назад
The Stanley Parable
@gametv9on
@gametv9on 9 лет назад
Willie Jeng now that brings the whole argument on a higher level
@moeman813
@moeman813 9 лет назад
You make a good argument my friend
@GrammeStudio
@GrammeStudio 9 лет назад
Willie Jeng what is the stanley parable?
@baileyface54
@baileyface54 9 лет назад
Gram T A highly meta indie game that I highly recommend. Google it, or find it on steam
@krneel128
@krneel128 9 лет назад
Paradigm shift not really.
@miyuden4118
@miyuden4118 6 лет назад
Explaining "Reality" with a Science Fiction movie.. So we live in a Movie reality now. lol
@phoenix9531
@phoenix9531 5 лет назад
This is absolutely fantastic writing and a great summary of the most important arguments aswell. Whoever conceptualized and wrote this does really know the topic well. Im impressed.
@theGamingtrees
@theGamingtrees 2 года назад
Honestly I would assume it was written by Micheal, he's done a decent amount of psychedelics and from what I can tell he understands this stuff to a good level
@GuyWithAnAmazingHat
@GuyWithAnAmazingHat 9 лет назад
According to that neuroscience paper they showed and other new studies, scientists have discovered that our 'choices' are just a list of commands dished out by the brain before we even make a conscious decision. It is a list of prioritised actions in queue that your brain will roll out from time to time, and it overrides whatever action you are currently having, making you think that you have suddenly made a decision.
@tmntsuperhiros
@tmntsuperhiros 9 лет назад
Would you happen to have a link? It sounds interesting. Oddly though from a philosophical standpoint (and I guess to some degree a biological one) what purpose does it serve a species to find out that what it does had no purpose? If there is no free will, what mechanism or force of nature would drive a human being to consider whether or not it has free will, much less to conclude it doesn't and thereby accomplish nothing?
@GuyWithAnAmazingHat
@GuyWithAnAmazingHat 9 лет назад
tmntsuperhiros io9 also has an indepth article on the subject with links: io9.com/5975778/scientific-evidence-that-you-probably-dont-have-free-will
@Axalon45
@Axalon45 9 лет назад
tmntsuperhiros Questioning free will is thus far a construct exclusive to humans, derived from the perception of choice that our everyday lives present us with. Realization of the reality of such a situation need not have a purpose, positive or negative, as the situations entire existence is a byproduct of our big heads rather than an inherent feature of life.
@prkrdp
@prkrdp 9 лет назад
GuyWithAnAmazingHat So is deja vu just something that happens when you subconsciously thought you already did something on your "list"?
@GuyWithAnAmazingHat
@GuyWithAnAmazingHat 9 лет назад
Lazy Coconut Yes, something like that. One thing about this 'list' is that hundreds if not thousands of actions happen at fractions of a second. Your brain is gathering information and reacting to them while maintaining your bodily functions. When doing such, there would be 'input lag', where certain neural pathways may become congested or is simply a longer path. Let's say you see something with your eyes, it will send information to the visual cortex and prefrontal cortex, for processing of the image and referencing with past memories to try to recognise something. If one signal travels faster than the other even for a fraction of a second, your brain might process those two pieces of information as two separate instances, resulting in you thinking that you've experienced it before.
@nejtilsvampe
@nejtilsvampe 9 лет назад
The fact that you have no free will is not really relevant to the question of responsibility. If a bear attacks you and wants to murder you, he is just acting on his basic instincts. It's not the bears fault, it didn't choose to be a bear, it's not really *responsible* for its actions in any meaningful way. But is that really a consideration worth making anyway? Aren't you going to kill or lock the bear up to prevent the vessel you call yourself from dying, regardless of whether or not the bear is responsible for its actions? Therefore, whether psychopaths have free will or not, we are going to lock them up either way, so it doesn't really matter.
@Stonegoal
@Stonegoal 9 лет назад
nejtilsvampe Why do people now a days want to lock other people up? You do understand that people are paid to guard them, feed them, wash their clothes, give them healthcare, etc. "Psychopaths" sounds like a murder. Just kill them. If you do not have the evidence you might want to increase the amount of cameras in that area of the city; paid for by our money printing government.
@nejtilsvampe
@nejtilsvampe 9 лет назад
Travis Romig If you watch John Olivers 'last week tonight', he had a segment about the death penalty. Basically it's _more_ expensive to execute somebody, than it is to imprison them. Moreover, I know this isn't the practice in USA, but in western European countries, particularly Scandinavia (where I live), the idea is not only to keep dangerous people away from the general population, but to *rehabilitate* them. So that they can re-enter society, and contribute to the economy and culture. Perhaps, even repaying all that food and housing that you mention, through the taxes that he otherwise wouldn't have produced. -So much for the economic argument. And it has been proven conclusively, that corporal punishment does *not* serve as a deterrent for crime. And I'd argue, if somebody is going to make an impulsive crime - he'd be more likely to make a more severe offense, i.e. killing more people - knowing that he is to be executed anyway, because what is stopping you at that point? If he on the other hand gets a chance to get back in society after he has served his sentence, he has a reason to make reparations for his offence, rather than escalating it.
@Stonegoal
@Stonegoal 9 лет назад
nejtilsvampe It cost a bullet and it takes 10 secs. Its hard to get normal people a job why do you believe its going to be easy to get a murderer a job and why should we?
@Stonegoal
@Stonegoal 9 лет назад
nejtilsvampe "if somebody is going to make an impulsive crime - he'd be more likely to make a more severe offense, i.e. killing more people - knowing that he is to be executed anyway, because what is stopping you at that point?" Those are the worse type. You should shoot them and take a look at their parents, family and friends for possible problems.
@OIVI3IV
@OIVI3IV 9 лет назад
If you do not believe what our Scandinavian friend said about "John Oliver Tonight" I would suggest reading this, www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/costs-death-penalty
@TheSqoou
@TheSqoou 7 лет назад
George Carlin said we're alive to make plastic.
@bobieawuah5879
@bobieawuah5879 7 лет назад
Only if I could have these types of conversations in real life
@xthe_nojx5820
@xthe_nojx5820 7 лет назад
Sandy Strand Probably, but you not yet.
@bobbobson4277
@bobbobson4277 5 лет назад
I do wish I had a script writer
@McDougle625
@McDougle625 5 лет назад
This is what happens when you grow up as "digital natives".
@gaming2top759
@gaming2top759 5 лет назад
Just find some events for smarties
@SchwaPPi
@SchwaPPi 4 года назад
Email me
@ChrisLeeW00
@ChrisLeeW00 8 лет назад
So...free will doesn't exist but believing in it makes you a better person? Interesting.
@tdawg281
@tdawg281 8 лет назад
Pretty much. The concept of free will is a physical illusion, but it is necessary in our context. Morality, humanity, and all those vague words are ultimately social constructs far removed from the basic physical realities of the universe. So the actions that we take can't be defined just by what we know about the core of the universe; once you realize that nothing about us is special, you can move on and try to make it special *for us*.
@andreluismarin8095
@andreluismarin8095 8 лет назад
+Christopher wootton determinism shouldn´t have that effect, but for many people I think I would have to agree. Not everyone has the opportunities to find ways to improve themselves or it doesn´t come easy, so then it´s a lot easier to blame it on ¨destiny¨, however I doubt that being selfish, mean, disloyal or deceitful has any strong influence on whether you are determinist or believe in freewill. If you are a ¨bad¨ person then you are just ¨bad¨ (probably influenced by your genetics, sociocultural status, life long opportunities and what you ate that morning).
@andreluismarin8095
@andreluismarin8095 8 лет назад
+Nitron DSP explain, please
@smokeemifyougotem9662
@smokeemifyougotem9662 8 лет назад
+TDawg no it really isint 90% of humanity bealives in some god or free will yet they are are fucking shitty people who lie cheat and steal. the 10% who accept there is no god and or no freewill are less likely to do bad things I mean the only big problem was stallen. hitler was actually Christian. but either way free will or not a lion will eat to live and a human will always do whats in there best interest and the ones who do things for others are just doing it to feel good at the end of the day
@Terilice1
@Terilice1 8 лет назад
+D. Lyrium so much this. seriously maybe head executive of crack (who i love) told this kid to make this video just to read comments like this. omg.... HES TRYING TO CREATE A PHILOSPHER STONE
@BennyVibes
@BennyVibes 8 лет назад
So my porn addiction isn't my own fault? Thank fuck!
@mr.cifuentes1779
@mr.cifuentes1779 7 лет назад
Benny Vibes you were predetermined, but its okay.
@jonm3388
@jonm3388 8 лет назад
Whos the "we" or "i" that chooses? Choices are made , but you'll find no individual controller. Do what you wiil, but you have no understanding what wills the will.
@justabitofjunkie2595
@justabitofjunkie2595 8 лет назад
Yep. Thoughts just appear in our consciousness, we don't ever choose them. You can like whatever you like, but you can't choose what you like. You can want whatever you want, but you can't choose what you want. Et cetera...
@jonm3388
@jonm3388 8 лет назад
Yessir. Mind blowing lol
@DomR1997
@DomR1997 8 лет назад
+Just a bit of Junkie Yep. That's all up to the guy sitting behind the screen with the controller screaming "Come on fuck face, Ace that test so I can go to the next level!"
@negheve2428
@negheve2428 7 лет назад
Well, this is one of the biggest questions in science. There are given conditions and rules the universe follows, but the question is: How did it all start? What was the initial state like? Why was it the way it was? What dit it emerge from? Why are the laws of nature the way they are?
@justabitofjunkie2595
@justabitofjunkie2595 7 лет назад
Elysius Well I don't think the "I" or "self" is a big question, I think it was in the past, but has since been adequately answered. There is no "I" or "self", at most there's just an illusion of one. This idea definitely enjoys the preponderance of evidence. As for the other questions, I'll assume, hopefully correctly, that "it" usually refers to the universe: "How did it all start" - I don't know, but I also can't assume that it did in fact "start". We're most likely part of just one universe out of a possibly infinite amount. "What was the initial state like?" - I don't know, but I also can't assume that there was an initial state. "Why was it the way it was?" - Because, duh. In all seriousness, and in our direct universe at least, it's governed by deterministic cause and effect. It is the way it is because of past events. This possibly breaks down when looking "outside" of our universe, but we can't really assume laws of nature outside of our "local" spacetime, one way or the other. There almost certainly is no meaning, purpose, or "reason" for anything at all to exist, if that's how you meant it. "What did it emerge from?" - I don't know, but the universe is probably just one of many bubble universes surrounded by a negative vacuum. This is the best explanatory reason for the big bang currently. "Why are the laws of nature the way they are?" - I'm not sure this can be satisfied. It's more about "how" laws of nature work, and not why they work, as they most likely don't have innate purposes or meanings, but can be used to explain natural phenomena.
@meh2521
@meh2521 4 года назад
I love that face he makes when he says "IT IS MY DESTINY" 😂
@alexblack8660
@alexblack8660 8 лет назад
All of time is like a set movie, and our consciousness is a personal play button.
@PizzaPlatypus
@PizzaPlatypus 9 лет назад
The laws of physics are a model not a definite thing, and often things come down to probability there's no certainty in the vast majority of things, even when broken down to specific areas. Radioactive decay for example. Also either way it doesn't really matter, free will and the illusion of free will makes no difference, you feel the experience of free will, whether that's an illusion or not doesn't really have any effect on our lives. Determinism basically is probably true but also it doesn't matter that it is, just like our total lack of ability to truly know anything, we can never know the truth but we can build models of the way our group perception of reality works which is all we really need.
@malcolmgraham8319
@malcolmgraham8319 9 лет назад
Wilf Shaw See also: Intentionalism vs Consequentialism, Kant: Ought implies can
@mr.conductor6168
@mr.conductor6168 9 лет назад
Wilf Shaw Cracked really should have clarified this in the video - they left out an arguably large chunk of the argument.
@S3anyBoy
@S3anyBoy 9 лет назад
Bill Donaldson They did in passing "even if quantum physics means that the universe is based on randomness, it just means you can't predict outcomes, not that you actually affect them" or something like that.
@PizzaPlatypus
@PizzaPlatypus 9 лет назад
S3anyBoy didn't really cover the idea that it doesn't matter though.
@malcolmgraham8319
@malcolmgraham8319 9 лет назад
Should be implied.
@camerondale6529
@camerondale6529 7 лет назад
"Identity" is ego and the illusion of separateness. "I ams" forged by the I Am That I Am.
@kevinpurdy8063
@kevinpurdy8063 4 года назад
Isaiah 45:6-7. Good and evil are controlled opposition. We're all puppets apart of the cosmic puppet show. The "I am" is omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient. Therefore the creator is in everything and everyone forever. Aum/om.
@Emerardo
@Emerardo 5 лет назад
Every choice we make is predetermined by things we have previously experienced, which were influenced by other things that influenced those events, and so on. Its basically a domino effect. The thing is thats incredibly obvious. And I dont say that to sound smart or intelligent, I mean people are over complicating what is such an obvious idea. Whether consiously or subconsiously, all of our choices are influenced by previous experiences, which were influenced by previous previous experiences. But by the very definition of what free will is, we still have it. We dont have the inability to make choices, but as living creatures our past experiences influence our character. When people refer to free will they refer whether you want to order a salad or a soup at a resteraunt, for example. Not if technically speaking you act on nothing you have ever witnessed, thought or experienced. Sorry for the overuse of the word "experience." I cant find an efficent synonym
@bryan_mancia2549
@bryan_mancia2549 4 года назад
The Emerald Warriors exactly but based off predetermined decisions caused by other decisions and ur dna you’ll be influenced to act a certain way and subconsciously choose soup or salad before you even consciously think about it
@hoparoundme
@hoparoundme 4 года назад
It's not about whether we experience things or have consciousness or anything like that. Think about it like this: You're running a simulation of something, so you set up rules and the starting parameters for the simulation (ie the laws of physics and the start of the universe.) Based on that information, you can compute and predict exactly what is going to happen in that simulation up until the end of time. No matter how many times you run the simulation, you will always get the same result. If there are certain rules like that, and you can't go back and change the parameters, there is no way to alter what is going to happen later on in the simulation. That's exactly how the world operates, and because the decisions that you are going to make in the future aren't just effected by experience and consciousness, but actually *caused* by the stuff that happened before and the laws of physics, you only *appear* to have the ability to make choices because that's what you were *bound* to experience. This is actually a really cool philosophical question and there are a lot of papers on it from a lot of perspectives. The general consensus from modern philosophers who are studying the field is that the world *is* actually deterministic, but the meta-ethical questions that spawn from that perspective are actually where things get really juicy. This field is definitely not obvious when you actually get into it, and it's so deep and broad that we've spent literally thousands of years considering these questions, so don't worry about sounding smart *or* intelligent. So, when people talk about free will they aren't talking about whether you have *want* to order a salad or a soup, they are talking about whether you had the ability to *change* whether you were going to have wanted a salad or a soup. Physics says that you were destined to order the salad since the big bang.
@MultiMaikimaik
@MultiMaikimaik 4 года назад
well if i have the coice between soup or salad im going to go back to past experiences in my head to determine wether i like soup or salad more (ofc more complicated "what do i need now?", "this is too heavy, too salty, too whatever for what i want right now" but still past experiences inform what im going to do) if i have only eaten my grandmas salad which tastes amazing im gonna order salad.. soo..still no free will?
@MultiMaikimaik
@MultiMaikimaik 4 года назад
Altruithism aight gonna contradict what i just commented, but thats what is so interesting..the more you know the less sure you are about what is true.. it is true that, if i set up a universe with objects that interact in a predictable way, i can determine what is going to happen at what point in time. BUT thats probably not how our universe works. we live in a universe with *heisenbergs uncertainty principle*, which states NOT that its hard to detemine a particles speed and location at the same time because our technology isn't good enough, it states that it is physically IMPOSSIBLE for anything to know a particles location and speed at the same time. it states that a particles movement is inherently random in our universe. so there are things that could influence your brain, behaviour, or character that are not determined. soooo..maybe still free will? also how do you make your text bold? thats really cool :D
@colinjava8447
@colinjava8447 4 года назад
I'm not sure how your defining free will, but I would say it was something like the ability to act independently of nature. I would say we are not free to choose, we only strongly feel that we are.
@Vallavender333
@Vallavender333 8 лет назад
i was pre determined to make this comment
@Under_Growth
@Under_Growth 8 лет назад
no you weren't..... oh wait fuuuuck
@Vallavender333
@Vallavender333 8 лет назад
You were pre determined to doubt me
@Short-ox4xf
@Short-ox4xf 8 лет назад
+sofullofpiss i would like to hear why not if you have the time.
@deanreaver3268
@deanreaver3268 8 лет назад
And I was pre determined to like said comment.
@AlxM96
@AlxM96 8 лет назад
I was predetermined to like it.
@TC-st9nt
@TC-st9nt 9 лет назад
"Either you believe God is Omniscient and can see everything that your going to do for the rest of your life, in which case you have no free will..." This is wrong. The two are not mutually exclusive. Just because God knows WHAT choice your going to make, doesn't mean he forces you to make that choice. It's still yours to make. You have to keep in mind that God exists outside of time. If time were like a river, God is standing on the bank of that river watching it. He's not standing in the river directing it's flow. Pre-determination and Free Will are actually mutually exclusive.
@Axalon45
@Axalon45 9 лет назад
Anthony Caputa I would argue that it depends on HOW God knows about what actions you will take. If he knows your actions because he is able to observe them directly as a timeless being, then your "choice" isn't really a choice because it had no alternative. Your action was the action you would choose, not the one you chose. God not choosing for us does not mean we have a choice. However, if God's knowledge is extrapolative based on total knowledge of all events and interactive outcomes on every scale within the universe in which we are bound, then free will has more of an argument. Our actions are not predetermined, just able to be predicted to 100% accuracy given a being with absolute knowledge of the now. This would preclude God being an entity that exists outside of time, but I don't believe that such a "limitation" diminishes the posed omnipotent and omniscient nature of such a being.
@1001011011010
@1001011011010 9 лет назад
It goes something like this: People can choose whatever they want to do. There were alternative choices these people could have made, but these people each opted for the choices which they did make, and not any other choices (obviously). And God, being able to know anything at any point in the future (or timeless, if you will), knows what these people did. Put another way: Time exists on our own plane and as we move through it, meaning we make the future as it happens. However, time is done on God's plane. The choices we made have been made to Him, but we are still making them, and further choices will be made. I don't see why so many people have trouble with that.
@kagutsuchi969
@kagutsuchi969 9 лет назад
Anthony Caputa Assuming, this is related to the judeo-christian concept of a deity, free will can not exist as our decisions are said to influence the eternity we receive. The deity presented as yahweh, is considered the three omni's: Omnipresent, being everywhere at once. Omniscient, knows everything that will occur past, present and future, as well as omnipotent. Now since the deity knows everything that will occur, it already knew before creating the universe who would end up in hell. Thus their being in hell is directly linked to being created to end up there. It knows every decision anyone would ever make and is literally there watching them do it at every point in their lives. They are destined to burn before they are made. Nobody can make a decision that the deity doesn't already know. It's like saying a toy car on a track has the free will to go wherever it wants to despite the fact that it is on a track and every outcome of its movements are predetermined. Complicated further as this isn't the only construct of what a deity is. To completely explore this, you'd have to define what a god is and its interactions with reality.
@autolycus100
@autolycus100 9 лет назад
Anthony Caputa nothing can exist outside of time. Time is the only dimension necessary to make a decision or an observation. If god exist, he cant be outside of time because if he were, he couldnt act on reality or even observe it. Because you need the passage of time to do things. Omniscience make no sense either. if you are the creator and you know everything that ever happen and will ever happen, then you cannot judge someone which is part of the creation for his actions in that system you have created. You already know what that person will do, therefore you already have condamned or glorify his actions before he made them, which also mean that freewill doesnt exist since you are already have judged him before that person as weighted the pros and cons of his decision. And by the way, if you have faith, yes God force you to do his bidding. If you dont do what he tell you, you go to hell or purgatory where your soul is tortured for all eternity. If you do what he wants, you go to heaven where you receive bliss for all eternity. Its not freewill if you have to obey a dictator who happened to buy you off with a gift or punish you with torture if you dont obey his law. Freewill doesnt simply mean that you have a choice to make, it mean having to make choices without threats or recompenses. It means making mistakes to learn and grow, and also not being judge by someone else standards of what is wrong or right. Someone who claim he has freewill cannot say he has faith. You either believe in something intangible that direct your life and tell you the answer to all your moral choices or you have freewill and you built your own code through experience without the fear or gratification of someone else judgement. I say this as part of a philosophical debate by the way, i respect whichever way someone want to live his life, with or without faith. Good day!
@TC-st9nt
@TC-st9nt 9 лет назад
kagutsuchi969 "Now since the deity knows everything that will occur, it already knew before creating the universe who would end up in hell. Thus their being in hell is directly linked to being created to end up there." I'm sorry lol, but you're just saying the same thing they said in the video. God didn't create you, so that you would go to hell. He didn't sit down before creating the world and say "Ok I'm sending Kag to hell, Lyrium to Heaven, and Stimard is going to purgatory," Instead it would have been more like "Let's see where Kag is going to end up," and he flips on a television and watches the entirety of your life 5 billion years before it ever happens.
@beckx101
@beckx101 3 года назад
"A man can do what he wants, but not want what he wants." Arthur Schopenhauer
@debopamseal1072
@debopamseal1072 7 лет назад
As long as I can make my body do what I want, I am ok, thats free will enough for me!
@something.icantrememberany1365
what if you want to do something you can't physically do?
@iTyncWithReality
@iTyncWithReality 5 лет назад
My nigga! That's what I'm talking about.
@colinjava8447
@colinjava8447 4 года назад
You can mostly, but the wants themselves you can't choose. That's why the illusion is so strong. If you really had free will you could instantly want to start knitting or skateboarding, but your brain is shaped to like certain things and not others.
@8ballirish
@8ballirish 9 лет назад
So I didn't choose to watch this video?
@doger944
@doger944 9 лет назад
Eightball Irish Everything that's happened in the past, the creation of the internet, your birth, you owning a computer, you finding cracked, you seeing this video and your mood today, led you to click on it.
@Anndgrim
@Anndgrim 9 лет назад
Eightball Irish You made that choice but you couldn't have made another one.
@doger944
@doger944 9 лет назад
Anndgrim exactly!
@TC-st9nt
@TC-st9nt 9 лет назад
doger944 But that doesn't exclude the fact that he still made a conscious choice to watch it.
@doger944
@doger944 9 лет назад
Anthony Caputa Only from his perspective.
@Arm4g3dd0nX
@Arm4g3dd0nX 9 лет назад
Aaaaaand all this is incorrect. The subatomic level exists probabilistically, so determinism cannot foresee specifically which event will occur, rather it must foresee the ever branching could-be's that can happen whenever one of two states may randomly occur. This property of the subatomic is already being toyed with in labs. Being able to somehow use it advantageously is the goal. Who is to say that a synapse, something we still don't understand well, doesn't already utilize this subatomic randomness. P.S.: I make no claims that this proves free will. I do make claims that determinism, how we previously viewed it, does not hold up. And so the assumption that free will must prove itself against the previously accepted concept of determinism is false. We still don't know enough, on either side, to place one concept as accepted, and the other as requiring the burden of proof.
@Axalon45
@Axalon45 9 лет назад
Arm4g3dd0nX Until I am made aware of some relation between the probabilistic nature of the subatomic and the behavior of the atomic, I will hold that one is not likely to exist in any meaningful way. Hell, I'm still not wholly convinced that this perceived nature isn't simply derived from a limitation of instrumentation. Us being unable to make satisfactory predictions of subatomic matter does not mean that this matter does not have stricter rules that it adheres to when we aren't poking it trying to get a peek. The only means of observation I've ever heard of are direct, involving collisions of often near equal sized particles and therefor inherently disruptive, to the observation. Is there a more indirect method of measure for these observations?
@darwinxavier3516
@darwinxavier3516 9 лет назад
Arm4g3dd0nX There is also the issue that randomness on the subatomic scale might have such infinitesimal significance that whatever differences it made would be completely imperceptible and probably irrelevant. I say irrelevant because the kinds of things people would want to predict are on the human scale.
@gumbilicious1
@gumbilicious1 9 лет назад
Arm4g3dd0nX for the sake of argument (because the Cracked RU-vid video comments section is where determinism and free will should be discussed) i will state that just because quantum mechanics seems to deviate from a concept of classical determinism doesn't mean quantum mechanics is nondeterministic. quantum mechanics doesn't describe a position of an object, but it does describe a superposition of an object with it's wave equation. this evolution of the wave equation forward and backward through time is a type of determinism. it might not allow us to predict where a photon ends up in a double slit experiment but it does readily allow us to predict the distribution of photons when the experiment is run many times. this is quantum determinism. so i'd say you have only discredited the concept of classical determinism (at least on the microscopic scale) and replaced in with quantum determinism. free will is still up for debate. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism#Other_matters_of_quantum_determinism included is a link with a super fancy equation.
@Teth47
@Teth47 9 лет назад
Arm4g3dd0nX As far as we know, yes, however, we're pretty sure quantum physics isn't the bottom level of reality, given that it's probabilistic in much the same way as classical elements used to be considered probabilistic until we worked out the underlying operations that give rise to those phenomena...
@Arm4g3dd0nX
@Arm4g3dd0nX 9 лет назад
Teth47 I absolutely agree. I think a lot of the complexity and confoundedness we find ourselves facing is due to defining concepts slightly off kilter (such as time, space, nothingness, infinity, mass, speed, etc), and assuming that our senses and instruments are showing us the whole iceberg of what is going on.
@prosimulate
@prosimulate 3 года назад
Destiny chooses you. You do not choose destiny. Always lived by this.
@bofreely.7383
@bofreely.7383 7 лет назад
This got me questioning life
@jonm3388
@jonm3388 7 лет назад
Dylan Decent Everything gets "you" questioning life. Either way, the way it is is the way it was is and will be. It's been happening the same way "your" whole life.
@jonm3388
@jonm3388 7 лет назад
Anjali Uberbeater yes it can be a crazy road. And the body definitely dies.
@dougrogan379
@dougrogan379 7 лет назад
J Money not if you freeze it.
@chiroxxxrt
@chiroxxxrt 6 лет назад
john smith love your comment lol but true I tell everyone we are not gonna be winners in life cause we all are going to die no matter what
@TacticsTechniquesandProcedures
Dylan Decent "only kindness matters" -- jewel... Well, actually Jesus Christ's words but it's a truth absent from any script or text.
@brendanmccabe2249
@brendanmccabe2249 9 лет назад
wow hilarious the ad before this vid was the coke choose ad and we all know its original coke you take
@JCstone1000
@JCstone1000 9 лет назад
Brendan McCabe the 'choose happiness' campaign is pretty philosophically tricky when you try and define happiness and the concept of good.
@xenathcytrin202
@xenathcytrin202 9 лет назад
Terncote I'm guessing the secret ingredient is happiness they stole from ethiopians.
@barelycompetent9220
@barelycompetent9220 9 лет назад
TLDR: whatever you want. Unless you were supposed to want that all along
@danieltaylor5371
@danieltaylor5371 7 лет назад
What a great video guys, keep it up! Loved the whole thing and especially the ending
@thomasmann3894
@thomasmann3894 7 лет назад
The best organized convo I have ever heard ever........I love this convo like crazy.....You guys should continue it
@reallyWyrd
@reallyWyrd 8 лет назад
The writing and acting on this are superb.
@legoinsomniac
@legoinsomniac 9 лет назад
Bit more deep than the usual today's topic but I'm down haha
@antred11
@antred11 8 лет назад
My personal, half-educated opinion. Even if we live in a 100%-deterministic universe, the fact that we don't and CAN'T know all the variables means that we're unable to predict with absolute certainty what the outcome of anything will be, so for all practical purposes we have free will even if we technically don't.
@Version2LP
@Version2LP 8 лет назад
By far the most accurate, and easy to convey, way to explain this out of all these comments. On a large enough scale, everything may happen in a completely predictable way by knowing all variables, and how they interact with one other to cause actions. But from an individual level, we can't see all the variables. We can't even understand all the variables in ourselves. From our perspective, we are making our own choice because we can't know the outcome. And if a person is nothing but the result of cause and effect leading up to that moment, then who's to say you aren't making the decision, based on who you have become?
@gankhef5564
@gankhef5564 8 лет назад
I think you're talking about a different kind of determinism. You'd be hard pressed to find a theorist who still holds to the classical kind of determinism that relies on a measurable number of variable, chaos theory does a good job at refuting that kind of determinism, but it doesn't really seem to shed light on the question of free will's existence.
@chaumas
@chaumas 8 лет назад
As you look at larger and larger scales, the randomness of the universe evens out. For example, if you're looking at the orbits of planets, you might as well be looking at a perfectly deterministic universe, because the random component is so slight as to be unmeasurable. It's very plausible that even at the scale of human brains, things are _practically_ deterministic. Consider a man-made classical computer, for example. Sure, they're subject to quantum effects like everything else, but everything we do with them relies on the assumption that they behave deterministically, and except in extremely rare circumstances, that assumption is borne out. The fact is that we just don't know enough about how brains work yet to know if they behave in way that could reasonably be described as "non-deterministic". But even if they do, the only reason for that is quantum uncertainty. It's not like randomness is some secret sauce that magically conjures free will into being. After all, if you have a computer program that makes decisions deterministically, and then you plug a true random number generator into it (say one based on radioactive decay), it would be ridiculous to say that the computer now has "free will".
@orppranator5230
@orppranator5230 7 лет назад
Yes... and even if we do know all the variables, predicting the future is just someone reading out what someone else did.
@sentvero2025
@sentvero2025 7 лет назад
Gan Khef You are like a person that denies gravity. "Hard Determinism is true but therefore free will is an illusion and you should act and feel like you have no free will!" Sorry but that's not going to happen. Even if determinism is true and we aren't responsible for our actions doesn't change our experience/or illusion of it.
@grizzlixx
@grizzlixx 7 лет назад
the problem with 'free will is just an illusion' is that it's impossible to deny because you can literally handwave everything as "that was predetermined to happen" no matter what.
@KainMalice
@KainMalice 10 месяцев назад
Says the guy with 700club in his name. By your logic, I could just say Jesus made me do it.
@demetrewoods6342
@demetrewoods6342 9 лет назад
Best "Today's Topic" ever! :)
@valzugg
@valzugg 8 лет назад
Realizing there is no free will releases us from guilt, hate, anxiety, etc, and makes any notion of "self" an illusion. It's just another way to define enlightenment. But it doesn't matter how well you can logically prove it to be true, no proof will ever seem complete enough because the only reason we think there is a free will is because it makes our lives seem at least a bit meaningful. It's a belief entirely based on rationalizations.
@debarooo22
@debarooo22 6 лет назад
i would be a lot lazier and reckless if I thought there was no free will
@syxxvralrock5759
@syxxvralrock5759 6 лет назад
Exactly, if free will doesn't exist, would then your desire to not participate become free will or a new program your body is sending it. If that was the case the body is illogical and doesn't understand it's functions. You can do things that are against the health of your body consciously. If we were an evolution that always sorts 'what needs to be done' people would be simply more successful as a function of existence. This is not true, we need to enact our wills in order to accomplish anything. Simply put, is there a successful person doing anything in the world right now that didn't put in the work to becoming successful? Work always predates success. This work is proof of our will, because if it isn't then shouldn't we all either be optimal always following our 'coordinates'. The mere ability to act differently than what you need proves free will. Otherwise need would always dictate your actions and you'd have no time for 'wanting' anything.
@FlamasNegras
@FlamasNegras 6 лет назад
Trying to believe you actions doesn't matter to feel better about yourself is just running from reality.
@egyptjohnson8076
@egyptjohnson8076 6 лет назад
Val Well said....
@KlintKaras
@KlintKaras 6 лет назад
Val and the reverse is people cling to the hope there isn't free will due to how scary it is knowing ,what you decide can have an impact.so its easier to think there is no free will,which life isn't easy .so while it does come down to personal belief,you should always know there's a chance you're wrong and take that into account...
@zackjackson5004
@zackjackson5004 7 лет назад
I won't accept that all of my actions are predetermined simply because there is always more than one choice to a situation, determined by an individual. We all have an effect on determining what the future will look like
@Fnidner
@Fnidner 6 лет назад
I can't believe Cracked is giving me stuff for philosophical debate. Can't count how many times I've seen this video...
@GodfreyVanZoom8
@GodfreyVanZoom8 9 лет назад
If you think of the universe as a giant computer and everything in it as variables then what we perceive as choice is actually just variables reacting with each other in the only way they possibly know how. Given a set of circumstances the human brain only ever knows one way to react to it and while each brain may be unique there is nothing unique about the way each brain reacts to a particular scenario
@supershawnodeseninja
@supershawnodeseninja 7 лет назад
here's the point that I'm stuck on: let's leave out anything mystical or spiritual, if I am the result of my experiences, then isn't it still me who makes choices? like if I am my brain and my brain tells my muscles to do stuff, that sounds like me making a choice. even if it's predetermined it's still freedom. like when someone says "you didn't decide that your brain chemistry did" I hear "you didn't decide that you did"
@nagysamuel2575
@nagysamuel2575 6 лет назад
supershawnodeseninja what i understand is These predeterminations come from experiencing events or simply consuming experience from people or happenings in our lives, this is how our brains grow Because nothing, not even a thought can be made or generated from nothingness So the brain consumes this data ( which is not decided by you, because you didn't decide wether or not or when or how you can see it ) and generates this simulation which is your personality and thoughts So you cant say that eating an apple instead of a banana is free will, because thats what your brain decided to do BASED on other thoughts that you had no control over
@nagysamuel2575
@nagysamuel2575 6 лет назад
Talos Thoren you make a good point with that seeking out new education thing But isn't that also predetermined ? I mean aren't we SUPPOSED to tend to seek out that information that is predetermined by our brain ? Its really confusing, and believing that free will doesn't exist is really terrorizing for me I mean doesn't that make us copies, that it doesn't matter how much you try to be free It doesn't matter because its all pre-fuckin-determined I really fuckin hope that im wrong
@mynameismike1864
@mynameismike1864 6 лет назад
"You can choose a ready guide in some celestial voice If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice You can choose from phantom fears and kindness that can kill I will choose a path that's clear I will choose freewill"
@woodrobin
@woodrobin 3 года назад
The argument that you can't alter the 4th dimension (time) because you can perceive it, like the other 3, makes no sense. You can see the ground next to you, then dig a hole, altering its depth. You can see the sky above you, then build a house with a roof and live in it, changing the apparent amount of height. You can alter elements within the three dimensions you perceive, as well as having other events alter things within those three dimensions. Being able to perceive a 4th dimension doesn't preclude altering it. Interstellar, the movie they use as the main example, has the protagonists interacting across time and altering the timeline. Predestination as an argument also has no requirement that you be able to perceive time as a dimension. They're unrelated concepts.
@llyrghmnghyll
@llyrghmnghyll 8 лет назад
1) Consciousness isn't a force, it's a theater. it's essentially a stop gap that allows decision making to be observed before the consequences are enacted. However even here the decision making isn't a conscious process, it's merely the observation that a decision was altered. Consciousness is essentially a way to record decisions we don't make. It's a useful tool for creative behavior, but not a causal force. 2) Free Will as a scientific concept is not possible for most of the reasons stated herein. It's unnecessary for cause and effect. It doesn't explain anything we can't better explain in another way. And if we add it into our understanding it makes things needlessly more complicated. 3) Free Will is a necessary social construct. Society is not possible without consequences for action. Consequences aren't acceptable unless they are deemed beneficial and fair. punishment for behavior that one has no control over is neither beneficial nor fair. Free Will is hence necessary for society to function. The human organism does not deal with the world as it exists, it deals with a narrative that functions to tie up the details of our lives. we have to include free will and the sense of self in that for our world to function, even if objectively they are hocus pocus.
@EmmaDilemma039
@EmmaDilemma039 7 лет назад
Drake Depew nobody else in the comments understands this. And I would add that it's kind of impossible to be aware of free will, or the lack thereof. We can't fully explain our own behavior, so we assume that choice, aka free will, is involved. It's an intuitive bias. But true free will would mean we have total control over our brain, and therefore our bodies. I could will myself to become blind; no longer interpret the light coming into my eyes. To be perfectly autonomous, we'd have to be immortal gods that don't interact with the outside world. Yet we think we have choice, so in effect we believe ourselves to be godlike. So god is the ideal projection of ourselves.
@a64738
@a64738 6 лет назад
I would say free will exist exactly because the world and society would simply not function without it... If no free will exist then punishment is just animal cruelty. Non of thees scientific ideas about free will not existing is any proof of anything. It is still just ideas and very nutty ideas it is indeed. Closest thing to a proof of free will you will probably get is that you are self aware, but I have met many people who in all practicality have no free will and act like a NPC in a computer game...
@alexanderjakubsen2198
@alexanderjakubsen2198 8 лет назад
Look up compatibilism. Not only can free will exist in a deterministic framework, freewill in any meaningful sense can ONLY exist within a deterministic framework. But yeah, arguing against an actress playing a straw man is a great way to build a philosophical case. NOT!
@candidmic7866
@candidmic7866 8 лет назад
+Alexander Jakubsen HE'S WRONG.YOU CAN ALTER THE FUTURE BUT ALL THE POSSIBITIES ARE PREDETERMINED. MEANING YOU CAN CHOOSE WHICH PATH TO GO BECAUSE ALL THE PATHS ALREADY EXIST. FREE WILL EXISTS BUT ON A FIXED TIMELINE THAT CAN GO MANY FIXED DIRECTIONS. WE DECIDE WHICH DIRECTION WE WANT TO GO WHICH IS WHY LIFE DOESN'T ALWAYS MAKE SENSE AND LACKS CONTINUITY BECAUSE WE CHANGE OUR MINDS AND DO SOMETHING THAT ALTERS OUR TIMELINE. SO WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IN FREE WILL OR NOT, YOU ARE "RIGHT" EITHER WAY. ITS "ALL" PREDETERMINED, THE KEYWORD IS "ALL" AND WE EXIST WITHIN THAT "ALL", AMONG MANY OPTIONS WHICH IS WHAT WE LIVE FOR. MEANING WE CAN CHANGE OUR DIRECTION IN LIFE ON A WHIM, ON PURPOSE, OR BY AN ACCIDENT. IF HE WERE RIGHT AND OUR EXISTENCE IS ENTIRELY PREDETERMINED, WE WOULD TELEPATHICALLY KNOW FROM BIRTH WHAT TO DO AND WERE TO GO , LIKE A PART OF A SINGLE FUNCTION MACHINE. THE "MACHINE" WE ARE A PART OF HAS MANY FUNCTIONS, MEANING MANY POSSIBILITIES IN IT'S FUNCTIONING WHICH WE EFFECT ON A DAY TO DAY BASIS WITHOUT DISRUPTING OR MALFUNCTIONING THE MACHINE BECAUSE IT KNOWS ALL OUR COMMANDS.
@thewigglytruth
@thewigglytruth 8 лет назад
+KlarK Kent I THINK YOU HAVE ALL CAPS ON, NO ONE WANTS TO READ YOUR ALL CAPS PARAGRAPH. Also you may have forgotten how the enter button and paragraphs work. Typing like that does nothing whatsoever to improve your point, nor does it give it more impact.
@candidmic7866
@candidmic7866 8 лет назад
Waffle Demon uhm sorry? better? the message was more important but didn't know my random youtube comment was being graded. hopefully you got the point of the message, unless caps makes it hard for you to read.
@moscanaveia
@moscanaveia 8 лет назад
+Alexander Jakubsen Well, you've blatantly stated that free will in any meaningful sense can only exist within a deterministic framework. That's the sort of statement that would require a follow-up explanation, rather than a complaint about a humour channel on youtube building cartoon characters discussing "philosophical topics". I am genuinely interested in your statement, by the way.
@darkcynite
@darkcynite 8 лет назад
+Alexander Jakubsen I think the best case scenario for anything approaching freewill is a decision tree or flow chart with weighted probabilities determined by truly random seed input. Many world interpretation would suggest I am one product of probabilities assuming decisions are quantum which if they aren't I'd want to make them so or what ever best randomness I can find. We likely can never know for sure the apparent randomness is truly random. Though if synthetic true randomness were possible it would be a wonderful thing for the establishment of this kind of freewill. The illusion could always be of practical value in a social species which needs to model others and others modeling them.
@marctronixx
@marctronixx 5 лет назад
First off, the cinematography here was CHOICE! Editing was immaculate! Color timing, pacing, reaction shots... BRAVO!!!! Secondly, the young lady here was gorgeous, and when she was dancing I think I fell in love.... Props to all the crew involved with this!! and no disrespect to her husband/man/boyfriend/girlfriend... :)
@dannyvalastro2974
@dannyvalastro2974 3 года назад
There is no choice get a brain
@BrandonCristal
@BrandonCristal 8 лет назад
This is low key my favorite Cracked video
@whitherwhence
@whitherwhence 8 лет назад
Time is not what you think. People think of time as a strict line of cause and effect, but it's more like a big ball of... wibely wobely... timey wimey... stuff.
@MultiMaikimaik
@MultiMaikimaik 6 лет назад
...what?
@bensons2405
@bensons2405 6 лет назад
5:30 "derp. oh look what i did, i am so god-like. I meanT to do that." LOL i have actually heard free will debates dumbed down to that level.
@matthewmcnamara2306
@matthewmcnamara2306 6 лет назад
The weeping angels are coming...
@Ryan_Nath
@Ryan_Nath 6 лет назад
Time's a human concept fam, it doesn't exist. Time was invented for the slave
@lawrencemorris2261
@lawrencemorris2261 6 лет назад
Oaky Oak truth is, without a control group, we will never know. We could be constantly freezing or replaying time and not notice it. A good control group would be a star, but we would still have no idea if we froze or not by observing a star billions of miles away.
@TheCrash480
@TheCrash480 7 лет назад
I always explain this by referring to 'nature and nurture', or genetics and circumstances. Your brain forms initially based on your genetics, and then is 'shaped' (For lack of a word) by the events/circumstances you experience. The product of the two is what determines your personality and, by extension, the choices you will make. You can't control your genetics and you can't control the circumstances you're born (Or more accurately, conceived) into, which means that the final product (Your personality and choices) must also beyond your control.
@cubah1
@cubah1 4 года назад
The Crash coupled with cause and effect and probability, determines the outcome of your choices.
@jpm199
@jpm199 4 года назад
Yeah, and who were you conceived by? People with no free will, conceived by.......BOOM ok pause rewind, see? that was the big bang. So what are we, in any real sense, other than just an irrecognizable eternal mass that just happened to grow a conscience, which then needed to explain things as time and space and that suddenly felt separated from the rest of the whole thing. I WAS BORN INTO THIS WORLD, you say, but were you? Where were you before being born? Where will you go tomorrow when brain go bye-bye? The whole thing at once. And you won't have to make any "sense of it". Fucking bliss, right? I mean above bliss but bliss as well. And we're the same thing now
@alastorlapid2365
@alastorlapid2365 2 года назад
Also, people for some reason think that determinism being false equals free will being true, which isn't the case. The existance of probability does not imply we in some way control that probability.
@TheCrash480
@TheCrash480 2 года назад
​@@alastorlapid2365 I've had this exact argument with someone before, I've had someone keep arguing over and over that 'determinism hasn't been proven', and it didn't matter how many times I tried to explain why this was irrelevant in a discussion of free will, he'd soon revert back to arguments against determinism. I firmly agree that free will _cannot_ exist, but I actually personally believe that our universe _isn't_ deterministic; the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics implies a true randomness at the smallest scales. Many worlds on the other hand implies that every possibility of a quantum interaction is played out, but I'd personally argue that this still results in a sort of functional randomness, as you could argue that what 'world line' something exists on is itself random. In other words the outcome of quantum events isn't 'determined' from the perspective of a single universe, as the universe doesn't know (for lack of a better word) what world line it'll end up on after a quantum interaction, making the quantum interaction fundamentally unpredictable and therefore functionally random; the multiverse itself would be deterministic, but things would be non-deterministic from the perspective of any individual universe.
@robertmckeown5315
@robertmckeown5315 6 лет назад
I am hooked on this channel for life. :-)
@archiewoosung5062
@archiewoosung5062 5 лет назад
Couldn't see any argument except that if the future can be foreseen, there is no free will. Who can look into the future?
@americantoastman7296
@americantoastman7296 4 года назад
Yeah they base half the videos argumentation on interstellars depiction of time. We have no idea if that is even close to accurate.
@1210620
@1210620 9 лет назад
1. free will is resulted from knowledge of outcome. without consciousness, the universe would follow a set state of effect. knowledge of that causality results in the free will of outcome. 2. we can effect physics. ... we HAVE defied the laws of physics. the laws of physics are patterns observed of the universe that change as our perception of the universe changes.
@RaptorJesus
@RaptorJesus 8 лет назад
+Gerard Newell Well no. We haven't defied physics, we've defied our understanding of physics. Two very different things.
@1210620
@1210620 8 лет назад
+RaptorJesus tomato tomato. unless you're one of those religious absolutist physics students... in which case: agree to disagree.
@RaptorJesus
@RaptorJesus 8 лет назад
Gerard Newell No, no. Our understanding of physics will likely never be 100%. Because something happens violates our understanding doesn't mean it violates physics. Clearly, it didn't. It happened.
@1210620
@1210620 8 лет назад
That's a religious way of looking at physics. "It's absolute and perfect and even when we flawed beings defy these laws, it's by its will that we defy it." Perzonally, i disagree with it because by that definition, no physics actually exist. Every law of physics is an observational guess that doesn't mean anything because they all can be conscientiously defied. But hey, whatever truth you serve, that's cool. Physics are the observational natural law of the universe which can be undermined by the consciousness of people and their ability to understand the natural state of the universe.
@1210620
@1210620 8 лет назад
+Ben Saberi that's actually 100% untrue. A globe is defined as a scaled model of the earth. The Earth is definately not a model of itself. There's a difference between language, math and science; all of which are methods of interpretation, study and communication of the world around us. No observation, communication or study of the world can be absolute because of humanity's flaws in faith, belief, understanding, reason, sense etc, but we can observe absolutes. can/can't, does/doesn't, true/false, yes/no. there are gray areas. ... but there are absolutes in these fields agreed upon in communication. so, the question is specifically: can man defy the laws of physics. what is the law of physics? a law of physics is an observed and agreed upon fact of how the universe works that the natural tendency of reality follows at all times: have we countered and defied these natural tendencies? yes. so have we defied the laws of physics? yes. Let me try try to express my point: nothing can move faster than the speed of light: until we make particles move faster than the speed of light.... we have done it.
@SamWatsonTV
@SamWatsonTV 9 лет назад
Really demotivated me from studying.
@tomjack1000000
@tomjack1000000 9 лет назад
Stop making excuses go back to studying
@Crick1952
@Crick1952 9 лет назад
TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR PREDETERMINED COURSE THAT YOU HAVE NO EFFECT OR CONTROL OVER!!!!
@XdmsT
@XdmsT 9 лет назад
Fuck studying and do something you like. Find a hobby and make it your proffesion...
@Anndgrim
@Anndgrim 9 лет назад
Crick1952 He does. His personality is still what defines his actions, it just means that his personality and the physical state of his brain are the same thing.
@Dead-cg1yy
@Dead-cg1yy 5 лет назад
Predeterminism is not the same as determinism. The former says time is written, the latter describes it as a continuation that’s constantly blooming. In either case, we don’t have free will.
@rorysimpson8716
@rorysimpson8716 2 года назад
Watching this as a philosophy nerd, "this is just entertainment don't um, actually." *raises pointer finger, takes a deep breath and...*
@ThisNameWasAvaliblle
@ThisNameWasAvaliblle 9 лет назад
I was pre determined to comment like and subscribe ?! Oh shit...
@TakeThisification
@TakeThisification 9 лет назад
Goddamn, this is interesting and insightful content.
@noahmotion6101
@noahmotion6101 6 лет назад
your best video yet. thank you for sharing
@danimations1440
@danimations1440 6 лет назад
Another fun topic as always!
@saraha180
@saraha180 8 лет назад
The argument that an omniscient god isn't compatible with free will isn't entirely sound. Inherent in the notion of a god is the notion of transcendence: that a god can do things that we can't. Perhaps said god can grant us free will without running afoul of determinism, because he sees time and causality in a different way that we can't even imagine. You can't posit the supernatural and then complain that the supernatural can't be supernatural. (Lowercase _g_ because I'm speaking of the notion of gods in general, not any specific conception of god.)
@justlurkin
@justlurkin 8 лет назад
You are the first person I've bumped into that finally understands this concept. Human beings are so lacking in humility that they believe their minds and senses are all that's necessary to understand everything that there is to be understood. They fail to understand that maybe there are concepts that we just can't and never will be able to comprehend. Maybe it is possible for some being more advanced that us to both know our futures and give us free will, but people just say nooooooooo, since it doesn't make sense to me then it doesn't exist.
@justabitofjunkie2595
@justabitofjunkie2595 8 лет назад
You guys get it wrong. An omniscient god isn't compatible with free will because of a very simple reason, and there's no way around it. Let's say there's a god named Bob, Bob is omniscient. Bob knows everything, this includes knowledge of the future, and all futures, including it's own, AKA everything, AKA omniscience. If Bob knows he's going to a baseball game tomorrow at noon he is never free to make a choice about going to the baseball game. If Bob can choose not to go to the baseball game at the last minute, he was not omniscient. This is a simple mathematical expression, and as I stated earlier, there's no way around it. Bob being both omniscient and able to make choices contradicts itself and is easily shown with algebra to be false. Bob can either be omniscient or possess free will, they cannot do both. It shares the same problems as other similar godly paradoxes, such as the omnipotence paradox. Can god create a rock so heavy that not even himself can lift it? If he can, he can't lift the rock, so there's something he can't do, so he's not omnipotent, and vice versa. Real simple stuff guys.
@saraha180
@saraha180 8 лет назад
+Just a bit of Junkie Yours is a common line of argument, but it depends on your conception of "causality," "paradox," "time," "future," "omniscience," "true", "false," "free," "contradict," and "mathematical." It doesn't account for the possibility that the possibility space may be larger than what you think it is. Can you prove that the mathematical framework you're relying on can evaluate every possibility and that it's free from contradictions? In standard logic, a contradiction implies that one of you assumptions is faulty. Can you prove that it's omniscience and not, for example, the very notion of _true_ and _false_ as applied to reality? Even within the study of mathematics, there are formulations of logic that don't follow the same rules you propose (e.g., intuitionistic logic). You have your beliefs about what is true and inviolable. I'm not even saying that they're wrong, or that I disagree with them. I'm saying that your argument essentially begs the question by insisting on a nontrivial set of assumptions, including that a god can't violate your preferred rules of logic.
@justabitofjunkie2595
@justabitofjunkie2595 8 лет назад
Sarah Hmmm sometimes even simple, concrete explanations aren't good enough for some people, obviously nor are mathematical proofs. Your argument falls into the same category as Russell's Teapot. Your right, we don't know everything, but to assume without evidence that facts are not facts, and that our definitions of terms are wrong, is irrational and a huge jump in logic. Occam's Razor also comes to mind. I guess you want to take a page out of Bill Clinton's book and say "It depends on what the definition of "is" is". We have no reason to believe the things you said are true, whether you believe them yourself or not. You can't prove that there isn't a celestial teapot orbiting the sun between the Earth and Mars, but to believe that there is just because it is not falsifiable is a failure in logic and an irrational belief. Bertrand Russell settled this line of argument long ago. Now, if you would like to get back into the mathematical proof it's quite simple. Assertion 1) God is omniscient 2) Omniscience includes all knowledge, including knowledge of all futures, including its own 3) God is free to make choices that can alter it's own future. Now, if 1 is true, 2 must be true. If 3 is true, 1 MUST be false. It's an airtight argument, there's no room for wiggling definitions. If you know your own future, you can't change it nor make decisions, choices, or judgments. If you can make decisions that alter the future, then you are not omniscient and you did not know the future. There's no reason to believe that it would work any other way, and to assert that it would, would require faith without a shred of evidence to substantiate it. I can't prove that you're not an invisible pink unicorn typing your comments from Alpha Centauri, but that doesn't lend any credence whatsoever to it being true. I have a strong feeling that we are just going to have to agree to disagree. It's impossible for us to go anywhere with this if we can't even agree on the definitions of terms used. Cheers.
@justlurkin
@justlurkin 8 лет назад
+Just a bit of Junkie You answered your own question just now when you said it requires faith. That is what God tells people to have in the first place and not to lean on their own understanding so for you to say that it is a contradiction, you would first have to acknowledge that you did not do what God said you should do. Now if the Bible did not exist, then maybe you would have a point but since it does then all belief in a God has a starting point and you can't compare it to a pink unicorn which is actually is completely out of nowhere.
@RealCoolGuy
@RealCoolGuy 9 лет назад
The argument for or against free will never really made any sense to me. If free will exists then we will pick our own destiny that will result in certain situations but if those situations are predestined, we still must complete the actions that lead us to that point. Either way, we don't know what's going to happen or what would have been different if other paths were taken since we call only exist from one perspective and time travel does not and never will exist.
@Stonegoal
@Stonegoal 9 лет назад
RealCoolGuy Its simple determinism promotes research because freewill is the claim that brains are just randomizers. Determinism directly supports psychology and sociology. There will be no one(a god or something like it) outside of the universe with all knowledge able to influence events to control us so it doesn't matter that the universe is deterministic. But when people make claims that brains have freewill it takes money and people away from psychology and sociology so we will understand the mind slower.
@sirmuttonchops7353
@sirmuttonchops7353 9 лет назад
RealCoolGuy Actually, time travel is in some theories possible, although they have their own problems to work out still. Regardless, it seems like you're overcomplicating determinism. Where you grew up, the people around you, your genetics, etc., all have a direct effect on how you interpret the world in the long-term scope of things. These can be seen as circumstances, and those circumstances lead to decisions (obviously basic at first as a baby or toddler, but still very important to your development). Those decisions led to putting you in new circumstances, lead you to make new decisions, which then determine your new circumstances, which then determine your new decisions, and so on. The basic idea is, because you could not choose those initial genetic predispositions, environmental circumstances, and intrapersonal connections (which are the things that determine your earliest decisions, which in turn determine your next set of circumstances, and so forth), you have no real freedom to your will.
@HertzyandEunice
@HertzyandEunice 9 лет назад
^Exactly. The thing is, that same line of thought also describes how things act everywhere. It's all cause and effect, and whether you actually have a will or not doesn't matter. You could in fact be a rock and everything that happens during your existence would follow because of previous and current circumstances.
@Julian-df2pj
@Julian-df2pj 8 лет назад
This is like The Merovingian and Morpheus discussing in that one scene except without the black clothes and green filter.
@kennymos9007
@kennymos9007 5 лет назад
I love you guys. Thank you for the video.
@andrijadragovic7470
@andrijadragovic7470 8 лет назад
Yes, the argument that you make is that nobody can actually break out of the chains of their future because whatever they do is the future. So, essentially - because determinism. And I supported that for a long time before realizing that it's only a matter of definition. If someone physically ties you up, we can definitely say that you do not have the option to move, and do not have free will. That's because: a) you're physically tied, b) you wouldn't have made the choice to move anyway, or c) both of the above. But usually when we say that a person is incapable of doing something, we assume that even if that person wanted to do that, they wouldn't be able to. And that's the point. Yes, everything is predetermined and yes, I don't get to make real decisions but that's only because I the choices I make are the choices I *want* to make (even though my wish to make that choice was influenced by other things). If I say that I can make the decision to, for example, open my fridge and eat cake right now, It means that *assuming that I wanted to*, I could go open the fridge and eat cake. Me making that decision is a result of a combination of both me wanting to make that decision and being physically able to do that. So now, the only problem is how you define "being able to". You can say that the choices we make are influenced by what we want, which is influenced by other stuff and that the choices we make are definitely going to be determined by past events, but those choices are only made because of the fact that they seemed the most reasonable at the time. The choices you make are determined by something but that "something" is reason. Your thinking and evaluation of options given to you is what causes you to choose one option over the other. What they're basically saying is: In 5 seconds, you are either going to be sitting or not sitting. And you have the option to make both of these choices but in 5 seconds you are definitely going to pick one option and not pick the other. You cannot change which option you pick because as soon as you change it, that becomes what you picked and in 5 seconds you are bound to make a single choice which you cannot change because it's predetermined. You are going to make one of those choices and you cannot escape that or change it in any way. But you don't need to escape it. As long as you made the conscious decision to sit or not sit (most likely sit, unless you're one of those standing desk assholes), it doesn't matter if you were bound to make one of those choices. The choices you make are determined by what is most beneficial to you and the fact that the choice is predetermined isn't important because you made that decision based on your will.Your will that has to be determined by something. You are free and the fact that you have to make choices isn't limiting. Logically, your will is determined by your wishes and as long as you get to make choices based on what you want, we can say that you have free will. Even if your wishes are determined by something that's still free will because even if you try to escape the "bounds" of determinism, that would be going against your wishes. You don't get to control your wishes because to do that you'd need to wish to control your wishes. Even if some evil god-like entity comes along and changes your wishes that's still free will because your choices aren't being changed. What's being changed is your wishes upon which your choices are based and if an alien controls my mind and makes me want to eat the cake in my fridge that's still okay because I can do that. If the choices you make are based on what you want then you have free will. And if your wishes are determined by something else then we just need to change the definition of having free will to... Well, you can't have free will because in order to do that you'd have to take multiple opposite choices and if you can't sit and stand up at the same time you're always restricted by not being able to make the other choice. *THE PROBLEM IS A MATTER OF DEFINITION.*
@Fuar11
@Fuar11 6 лет назад
You understand it as it is. That is the cause of a lot of issues. Our definition of the things we socially construct and that are physically there.
@bensons2405
@bensons2405 6 лет назад
or an different option, i defy your laughable primitive laws of fundamental physics and escape. hence forth proving my superiority and difference between free will and determinism also belittling you in the process with an feeling of inferiority. LOL
@americantoastman7296
@americantoastman7296 4 года назад
I like the idea, but I think there's a logical fallacy involved. The idea that in 5 seconds Ill either do A or NOT A is obviously correct, but attributing this to predetermination is fallacious. Instead I feel like its much more logical to assume its due to the fact that time only allows for one instance, one choice at one given moment. I could never do both things at the same time, but you make it seem like this is what I would have to do to disprove your hypothesis. Youre asking the impossible.
@jacobtanner3544
@jacobtanner3544 8 лет назад
What ever is going on I doubt its simple enough for a mortal to understand
@mista_fur3346
@mista_fur3346 6 лет назад
I understand, but it would blow your puny little mind.
@albinhjertstrom1602
@albinhjertstrom1602 7 лет назад
This might not be the perfect video to watch on a lonley friday night
@chaumas
@chaumas 8 лет назад
The last two lines of this crack me up every time I watch it.
@jasonggabbott
@jasonggabbott 3 года назад
How many times do you watch this?
@joeljohnson6140
@joeljohnson6140 5 лет назад
🤔I was predetermined to be lost in all this 🤔
@colinjava8447
@colinjava8447 4 года назад
What don't you get?
@Nordy941
@Nordy941 7 лет назад
I used to think this then I did a lot of thinking in jail. The past does not control the future. The past got you to where you are right now. You woke up in the bed that you did today because of the past. However, the future isn't written buy the past It dosen't matter where you woke up today. That you can't change. It matters where you wake up tomorrow. And the only why to change that is by changing yourself today.
@matbbm
@matbbm 6 лет назад
Wow you are a great scientist
@matbbm
@matbbm 6 лет назад
Not. Go back to jail you spazmoid
@FuryTA
@FuryTA 6 лет назад
I know its old but thanks for this.
@helensmith7596
@helensmith7596 6 лет назад
Mark Nordhausen so yr future decisions will be based on yr past. No free will
@r4nger5tube
@r4nger5tube 6 лет назад
Thank you. That was so much fun!
@JoelReid
@JoelReid 8 лет назад
It is possible to have free will and predeterminism. But only if the future has not been determined yet. This does not mean there are multiple futures, only that we can not predict the future, only make good guesses... unless the following is true: if there is a god who knows the future, then he/she is basing that on knowing what our choices are before we make them, but not interfering with our choices. The god might use those choices to their advantage (or ours) but allow them. A teacher or parent does this to some extent with kids. They might give a kid a choice or question in the full knowledge of what choice the child will pick in order to arrive at a lesson or conclusion. One could argue that there is no choice as the options are usually directive to one option, but that does not preclude the alternative. A good challenge is to ask about the story of Mount Sinai in the Bible/Torah. Here God is ready to wipe out the Israelites and go off somewhere else. But then Moses convinces God to give them another chance. The issue is: if God is all knowing then he would know Moses would change his mind and so why bother the whole act in the first place? Especially as he has made promises he can not revoke and therefore can not kill the Israelites. Well, this is a tricky theological as well as philosophical discussion, but basically it revolves around that if God (the adult) knows the future then he chooses to sometimes ignore this future in order to give the opportunity for his followers (the kids) to choose a wise choice... Of course, maybe a god is just a really cunning manipulator who set it all up from the big bang and we cant help but flow with their river.
@Lynchy626
@Lynchy626 8 лет назад
+Joel Reid Why indeed. Could it be that he did that for the sake of his much vaunted (and very confusing) plan? Or is it because he himself has to follow a path? Perhaps even he is below something else. We don't know. Its likely that we never will, nor is it possible to know without frying your brain.
@CrayPlaySwe
@CrayPlaySwe 8 лет назад
+Lynchy626 If he's all-knowing, that means that he knows what you're going to do before you are even born. If he knonws what you're going to do, how can you claim to have free will?
@Lynchy626
@Lynchy626 8 лет назад
Cray Play Exactly. If he know you're going to do it, then you were already going to do it, then you're choice was predestined, then you have no free will. Its a point I've been trying to make on other comments, here I just pointed out some flaws in the argument this man made.
@JoelReid
@JoelReid 8 лет назад
If you knew you would make a desicion it is still free will.The issue is you have chosen to in future make that decision. The issue is most people see free will as a random choice made in the current moment. There is nothing to suggest that our choice at the moment is not made up of many small choices in the past. This may look like predestined, but it is not if you consider each small choice is random, it just is not of any noticable value. Consider for example that my end goal is to have pancakes tomorrow. I might wash the dishes today, include flour in my shopping list last week, buy a spatula last year, a fry pan five years ago, learn to make pancakes ten years ago... all those were choices made to determine the larger choice today.
@Lynchy626
@Lynchy626 8 лет назад
+Joel Reid Yes those choices ALLOWED you to make that choice. However, Free Will is defined as " the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion." If you were always going to make that choice, then it was predestined. Fated. You acted according to fate. Thus, it does not fit within the definition of free will.
@WAX1138
@WAX1138 9 лет назад
You're a passenger on the bus of life not the driver you can choose seats change your clothes talk to whoever you want sleep eat jump out the window but you're not driving the bus
@malcolmgraham8319
@malcolmgraham8319 9 лет назад
Donald Baker Not quite how that works. You're like the seat on the bus. You're moving and you are there.
@Minstorm34
@Minstorm34 9 лет назад
no
@WAX1138
@WAX1138 9 лет назад
Only if you assume causality and time work the way that most people perceive that they work instead of the way that physics describes that they may actually work.
@malcolmgraham8319
@malcolmgraham8319 9 лет назад
Are you referring to Machio Kaku's mention of the Heisenberg Uncertainty principal because that was addressed in the video.
@WAX1138
@WAX1138 9 лет назад
Time is a more fundamental imperative of the universe beyond just the part that we perceive. It would seem the time flows evenly through all of the 10 dimensions of string theory and perhaps beyond that. This would explain why experiments have shown thermodynamics breaks down at temperatures near absolute zero and recent indication of previously theorized tachyon like particles. Professor Murch at the University of Washington has some interesting results indicating time's actual nature news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/future-affects-past-quantum-state.aspx. Just one example
@aliasmask
@aliasmask 3 года назад
Very cool. You touched on most of the bases in an entertaining way. Imo, free will isn't the lack or predictability, just the opposite. People do things based on what they predict to be the best outcome for themselves in someway, but since they can't possible know all the factors there is a bit of uncertainty in their free will. Also, speaking of physics, Uncertainty Principle.
@theyellowmeteor
@theyellowmeteor Год назад
If people do things they predict to be the best outcome in some way, then given the same situation they will do the same things. So, no free will. Either you can predict people's actions based on their past, their genes, their beliefs, their mood at the time etc., and they have as much free will as a robot, or you can't, and they have as much free will as a random number generator.
@aliasmask
@aliasmask Год назад
@@theyellowmeteor The problem is information. You look at enough factors and can get a high degree or certitude, but it's not going to be 100% because not all factors can be considered when it comes to someone's thinking.
@theyellowmeteor
@theyellowmeteor Год назад
@@aliasmask Refer to my second paragraph.
@trvpyn
@trvpyn 7 лет назад
Elaine level moves there, lol. Keep it up!
@niklausfletcher2290
@niklausfletcher2290 7 лет назад
This makes no sense, just because you cant change the past (debatable) or the idea that the future, present and past all exist at the same time doesn't mean that the choices you make are all predetermined, you still make those choices.
@orppranator5230
@orppranator5230 7 лет назад
YES! and predicting the future is just someone reading out what you did
@satya4234
@satya4234 6 лет назад
Niklaus Fletcher Can you change the past?
@bensons2405
@bensons2405 6 лет назад
Naw, determinism is just more awesome. It's like saying no matter what you do, you will still always pre determined to end up there. You can't even change the basic laws of physics, so how you think you have "free will"? further more you can't even prove that "free will" even exist. But you can however u can prove that determinism is very much real. That's what the difference is. One is an illusion the other is real power to effectively change the future...
@SweetcheeksMcGee
@SweetcheeksMcGee 5 лет назад
You don't decide to decide how you decide unless you're aware of your conditioning and how it's affected you, since you didn't have control over your upbringing, you don't control how you upbringing conditions you to make certain choices, your choices are based on your personal experiences, therefore your choices are limited to your perspective
@Emerardo
@Emerardo 5 лет назад
Every choice we make is predetermined by things we have previously experienced, which were influenced by other things that influenced those events, and so on. Its basically a domino effect. The thing is thats incredibly obvious. And I dont say that to sound smart or intelligent, I mean people are over complicating what is such an obvious idea. Whether consiously or subconsiously, all of our choices are influenced by previous experiences, which were influenced by previous previous experiences. But by the very definition of what free will is, we still have it. We dont have the inability to make choices, but as living creatures our past experiences influence our character. When people refer to free will they refer whether you want to order a salad or a soup at a resteraunt, for example. Not if technically speaking you act on nothing you have ever witnessed, thought or experienced. Sorry for the overuse of the word "experience." I cant find an efficent synonym
@thinklikeido
@thinklikeido 7 лет назад
Free Will is one of Rushes greatest songs!
@aa1bb2cc3dd4
@aa1bb2cc3dd4 4 года назад
On an unrelated yet interesting note, the actors of apollo 13 had to ride the vomit-comet to film the zero-g scenes.
@just10tyson
@just10tyson 6 лет назад
Literally the best video online
@theravens52
@theravens52 8 лет назад
If free will doesn't exist, how can we justifiably be held accountable for our actions? How can we punish a murderer for his or her choice to murder if that person was PREORDAINED to murder without the possible of altering that preordainment? Does that mean that morality doesn't exist? That right and wrong do not exist? I reject such a hypothesis because we live with the free will of ourselves and others every minute of our existence.
@lucioh1575
@lucioh1575 6 лет назад
You should punish people because it can prevent them from doing it again, wether by not allowing a situation where they could do it, or by making them want to avoid getting punished again. Until you can actually change someone's brain to not be criminal, you don't have much of another option. >Does that mean that morality doesn't exist? That right and wrong do not exist? Yes. It's all bullshit. WE make our own rules. That's why different cultures have different moral values. But here's the thing: for a rule to be applied and for people to get punished if it's not respected, some authority has to decide this, and this authority could be most people of a group. That's the idea with democracy. For example the vast majority of people in my country think it's fucked up to torture animals for fun, therefore it's illegal. However they seem to be fine with the idea of making chickens live in cages that are as big as a sheet of paper, even though you and I might find this immoral because of our ability to feel empathy.
@alastorlapid2365
@alastorlapid2365 2 года назад
Because it is our destiny.
@alastorlapid2365
@alastorlapid2365 2 года назад
Wanting something to be true doesn't make it true. The universe doesn't owe us anything.
@sharonkoivu1806
@sharonkoivu1806 7 лет назад
You telling me that Trump was predetermined by the universe.....
@MrAdrian1203
@MrAdrian1203 7 лет назад
Allan Koivu :-)))))))) no way :)))))))
@sharonkoivu1806
@sharonkoivu1806 7 лет назад
Yes the Universe is a gullible bumpkin....
@billyjimbobjr
@billyjimbobjr 7 лет назад
Over a long enough time line yes
@MoonchildOfDarkness
@MoonchildOfDarkness 7 лет назад
I think that if I like, zoom out on everythin, the fact that Trump got elected is a universal way of telling people to stop being a bunch of anger-ridden chumps. Because an anger-ridden chump is now head of a powerful country. Eh, in my opinion, anyway.
@Akirathedemonslayer5
@Akirathedemonslayer5 7 лет назад
The universe has no free will either m8
@kreadapelu8813
@kreadapelu8813 6 лет назад
I began watching the Today's Topic playlist while doing what I anticipated to be a long, boring journey in Elite Dangerous scanning systems for all they are worth between a 7 jump path I had been frequenting. At some point I discovered and subsequently determined to scan a system of more than 45 different astronomical bodies... The distances between the stars of this one system made the task last more than an hour. I rushed back to my home base and turned in the data I gathered. To my horror, that system did not yield even 150,000 credits. Others that I had only passed by and scanned nothing but the bare outline brought it more. The only thing that allowed me to bare the maddening event was the greatness of these people at Cracked and these fine videos they spew out like some sort of video spewing machine. 2 out of 10 stars. That is high rating, I mean... All the life we know of in the entire universe only gets one star.
@ZachsMind
@ZachsMind 7 лет назад
My liver wants to choose to have free will but I keep pouring beer into it.
@omniXenderman
@omniXenderman 8 лет назад
nothing is predetermined, quantum mechanics, superpositions, strings and all that. humans may be a collection of chemistry but we have at least some modicum of power to affect the randomness to an extent. just because randomess can be changed does not mean it is no longer random.....damn this is good weed......
@KingIsulgard
@KingIsulgard 8 лет назад
+omniXenderman Just because reality is random at it's fundaments doesn't mean we have any effect on it. We can only predict the most probably outcome of a quantum event but have no power to change the chance of that outcome either way.
@omniXenderman
@omniXenderman 8 лет назад
KingIsulgard at least we can attempt to, so free will does exist, even if its utterly innefectual
@KingIsulgard
@KingIsulgard 8 лет назад
+omniXenderman That honestly does not make sense. To have effect on the outcome of quantum events one would have to change the nature of reality itself, ergo create a new universe which is bases on will instead of chance. And ironically, creating that universe would just be the result of the physical rules of our universe leading through all these events to the outcome that we "want" to create such a universe. So really, there is no escape.
@zinqtable1092
@zinqtable1092 8 лет назад
+KingIsulgard Fuckin hate neurotypicals that won't except the truth.
@pablowa5947
@pablowa5947 8 лет назад
+omniXenderman The randomness of quantum mechanics does not apply on us, randomness aply only in the quantum level.
@syi666
@syi666 9 лет назад
super position
@Crick1952
@Crick1952 9 лет назад
They addressed that. They said it keeps everything from being predicted (Newton's Clockwork Universe) yet whatever happens can't be undone (no backwards time travel) therefore it is inevitable aka predetermined.
@cgibson345
@cgibson345 9 лет назад
MR. Mushroom it's talking about how our human observation changes the form the particle becomes, but because human actions are predetermined, that was to.
@dodopod
@dodopod 9 лет назад
MR. Mushroom It's not the future affecting the past. According to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, an object (in this case a helium atom) is neither a particle nor a wave until it is observed. The atom wasn't changed retroactively, it was neither particle nor wave when it traveled through the first pair of lasers. It only appeared to have been when it was observed.
@MARI0LAND
@MARI0LAND 9 лет назад
syi666 many worlds?
@rodneykennedy7314
@rodneykennedy7314 7 лет назад
what if your choices places you into a universe where the consequences of that choice play out but you didn't notice you moving into a different universe because of how often you shift universes
@americantoastman7296
@americantoastman7296 4 года назад
That was one of their counter arguments, but they didnt even debunk it.
@freddymeisner
@freddymeisner 7 лет назад
This is one of the best arguments for determinism I've heard in a while
@e5ten
@e5ten 7 лет назад
Your choices are based upon your circumstances. If you did something, but time then jumped back five minutes with nobody knowing, meaning the situation would be identical, and you would make the same choice. So if someone somehow knew your exact psychology, and physical make up, they could predict what you would do, assuming they knew what circumstances you would be in.
@naman245
@naman245 6 лет назад
That's obvious..lol
@Emerardo
@Emerardo 5 лет назад
Not necessarily true. A lot of choices we make as humans are based on subconscious thought.
Далее
Finger Heart - Fancy Refill (Inside Out Animation)
00:30
🎙СТРИМ на 4 МИЛЛИОНА🍋
3:12:45
Просмотров 1,3 млн
ВОТ ЧТО МЫ КУПИЛИ НА ALIEXPRESS
09:35
Просмотров 475 тыс.
МЕГА ФОКУС С ЧИПСАМИ
00:42
Просмотров 108 тыс.
Why Marriage is a Scam - Honest Ads
5:32
Просмотров 7 млн
The Most Controversial Children's Book in History
40:38
Why Metal Gear Solid V Is For Babies - Escort Mission
7:30
Is free will an illusion? | Uri Maoz | Big Think
5:35
Просмотров 141 тыс.
The Mystery of Free Will: Donald Hoffman
17:32
Просмотров 161 тыс.
Вилка для консервов 🥒
0:51
Просмотров 978 тыс.