Will the Catholic Church Change What It Teaches? An Archbishop on Dogma and The Magisterium | E101 

Cardinal Wilton Gregory for instance refers to President Biden as a cafeteria Catholic for picking and choosing parts of the faith while ignoring or even contradicting other aspects of his adherence.

@@user-mn9ej5bx6x He should talk,He does the same thing and let Biden take the eucharist knowing he is a public heretic, pushing abortion!

How do you know truths are given by the Church.

@@AlexLightGiver By Scripture and all the councils of the Catholic Church for 2000yrs! In the councils Dogma's are declared infallibly in canons therein!

@@dianneraimondi8382 None of that is true

@ValsVersion. It has in the past, and it eventually…will.

@@HannahClapham no. It has not on anything significant and not on faith and moral

He can only counsel her not to proceed with that process.

@@bridgefin Thanks. Interesting. I've been told the opposite from a pious, though seemingly unaware or morally at-variance doctor. Apparently, authoritatively delivered moral instruction would be in order.

@@MM22272 One cannot cooperate in evil.

@@bridgefin Great start for a homily.

My Rock is Jesus. You are free to choose yours

Oh, it's those sectarian falsehoods from tim spangler yet again. You know Jesus is our rock for Catholics so you are just being abusive. We depend on Him & it's part & parcel of belief in His giving the Keys of the Kingdom with no more of a contradiction when Jesus originally said it than it is now. You don't have to be persuaded of the same understanding but it's entirely biblical & based on our faith in Jesus😇 with or without the final authority of Tim.

@@josephodoherty7864 What sect am I echoing?

Archbishop Richard Smith of the Archdiocese of Edmonton :)

Yes, while not advocating for divorces.

@@bridgefin Thanks. That sounds like a conflict of interest morally and professionally. Firms feed on billable hours.

@@MM22272 You: So build your practice on general law but handle divorces as required.

@@bridgefin That doesn't resolve the conflict of interest.

@@MM22272 Protesting a client who is going through a divorce is not necessarily cooperating with the divorce. The divorce will happen in this culture. If it can't be avoided then there still is a valid need for legal advice and action. Otherwise unjust things will occur regarding alimony, assets, children. Achieving the best solution in God's eyes in the face of un-Godly activity is virtuous. And the lawyer can advocate for an alternative solution all during the process to try to preserve the marriage.

That old hate-filled, sectarian slur & BS shouldn't be spewed out by any Christian. Secondly , it is not a feeling of attraction That's not the sin. It is the acting on it that is, whether it is towards someone of the same or the opposite sex, so do we only accept applications to the priesthood from the completely asexual? Hate the Sin ; Love the sinner.

@@josephodoherty7864 It appeared in national news papers and Cardinals addressed it. That's why Francis wants it to stop.

Many idiots who believe in the satanic cult of sola scriptura a man made tradition invented by a devil possessed were trying to destroy the Church that Jesus established under the stewardship of Peter but nothing happened to it because Jesus has promised to Peter saying no gates of hell will prevail against it and will remain till Jesus comes back it is heretic protestant churches getting fragmented into countless denominations all contradicting each other all the time surely gates of hell is taking care of them.

Where did you get this ridiculous statistic from?

@@michaelhaywood8262 Published reports, discussed by Cardinal - Archbishops. That's why Pope Francis said that. He knows the numbers are probably over 54%.

Your history is wrong.

Wrong since the C11th AD. The grooming of the church role group to set up a celibacy law in the C11th AD was for economic advantage of the families of the familyist family member groomers of their and others' psychologically and or emotionally vulnerable family members by occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate, tax-exemption embezzlements and lower insurance cost by fraud. This occulting was achieved as hidden behind falsely purporting presuming consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ is a higher vocation than consecrated male female marriage vowed to God.

to Gerard McGorian, Whose “sleight of hand”? Who were the “people” that it “turns … off”? Was it groomed, and who by, with an occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate, inducement? What is the only power that withstands extreme tensions caused by this inducement and how are they withstood? When and why was it first possible to exercise this power worldwide? Was it when the first worldwide national accounts became available at the UNO from 1946 allowing a conclusion from testing these accounts to be acted on in 1964 simultaneously at the UNO Food and Agriculture Organisation and Pope St Paul V1’s Commission on Population? What caused the incomplete conclusion from acting on these accounts to be completed by Pope Francis in his consecrated celibate marriage on 17 June 2021 in the cases of inversion of role and identity by the Vatican state helper of the family role group of Cardinal Angelo Becciu (convicted on 18 December 2023) and nine others (today eight reported confirmed convicted) embezzlements of his procreation role gift charity donations and Italian Parliament “Zan” anti-homophobia bill unacceptable risk of fraud on his identity? Is the answer in the statements of Pope Francis on 16 June 2016 and 10 June 2021 and what and how was kept on 17 June 2021 in uncertainty of belief? Was this keeping of the multiplication of economic processes and non-economic progress by what was revealed at Exodus 3:14: “I AM WHO I AM”? Was this keeping as incomplete at the UK Oxford University Institute of Agricultural Economics in 1964 completed on 25 February 1991 in the roman catholic Archdiocese of Brisbane as confirmed by Pope St John Paul 2’s Council for the Laity on 29 September 1994 and his Council for the Family on 8 December 1995 at TTMHS, 24? Was a double keeping causing/caused by a third keeping as trinitarian? Was this third keeping in covenant, non-presumed reciprocity? Why and how are men “gods” (John 10:34)?

@@billyhw5492 Wrong? Have you kept in uncertainty of your belief the inseparability and qualitative equality of your history thinking and your having faith feeling?

Disciplines can be changed. Dogmas cannot. Celibacy is a discipline.

References and/or sources for your statement, please?

@@cindiloowhoo1166 Sure, Jesus is still teaching today and is accessible to you and everyone. The data is easily Googled. Most scholars are aware of this

That's an extremely bigoted comment with no apparent impetus except to advertise your sectarian hatred.

Agreed. Stupid question for a devoted con man.