William Lane Craig Talks Multiverse & Fine-Tuning | With  

Download FREE Cheat Sheet “The 4-Point Case For Christianity” 👉📱cutt.ly/ZYMC4nl

Thank God (literally) for men like Frank Turek and William Lane Craig.

He' got the whole world in His hands explained in science format!❤

Thank you. Shared this video on Facebook & Twitter (X).

I come from Poland and I thank God that I learned English! God how I respect and love these two🙏The only thing missing is Ravi Zacharias🤒🤒🤒

Thank You brother Frank for all that you’re doing for the Kingdom of God.

Good video

William Lane Craig is passing the torch of greatest living apologist to Frank Turek

I'm not gonna pretend to know this stuff so I will share what I know. 9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. 11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. 12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. 13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved

Who was the guy from Oxford he mentioned to spoke against the multiverse? I didn't catch that name.

What evidence do you have to support p.2?

Even if Multiverse exists.... None can reject the possibility of an all powerful and all knowing Creator.

Is the universe finely tuned for life or has the universe as it is enabled life?

Is there a reason Craig has stopped debating people?

It always comes down “I just want to do my thing “

Someone needs to explain to me how we know the values of the constants of the universe are all equally likely and do not follow a Gaussian distribution (like almost everything else in the universe). IQ is a combination of many variables too and ranges from 5-195 yet something like 70% of all people range in the middle 10 points. This is independent of the amount of people. With a sample size of 1 universe. How do we know our universe is one of the extremely rare IQ numbers and not in the middle. The odds it is one of the middle once is by definition much higher. We see the same in nonbiological physics. Add 2 dice rolls and the range is 2-12 yet the chance you roll 7 is much higher (1/6) than 2 or 12 (1/36).

❤❤❤❤❤

If it was an orderly and systematic expansion then it wasn't a bang or explosion in any way. Better to call it The Creative Expansion.

God has fine tuned Frank's hair color.

Multiverse would mean some kind of Universe Generator

Remember that the multiverse would also need its beginning...

Can a multiverse be binary in nature? Like one for Heaven and one where the Earth is located.

Hugh Ross of reasons to believe, believes that this universe has 10-11 dimensions of time & space & says that mathematics & physics have proof of these dimensions & higher dimensions!!

nao tenho fe para ser ateu!!

If the multiverse exists, there would be persistent attempts to travel between universes. And if someone cracks the code, there will be a huge mess. The multiverse is not something anyone should want. It sounds cool at first. But then, you have to consider what you know about human nature and all the things that can result from it, with the multiverse existing.

Premise 1 and 2 is not granted, so the argument fails. Why listen to this ignorant person regarding the universe? Why is this PhD in philosophy making such fallacious argument?

So where can we find your invisible friend?

A Hindu scripture quotes, time being the destroyer of worlds. Should we take generations as worlds? We can shape worlds with the awesome power of faith. We leave it where it belongs, in buildings that are not our homes. The only faith that can truly benefit society from the home, is adult couples can have their children without shame, guilt or regrets. Let’s teach our children to be productive members of society. Where the mothers of little babies and children aren’t leaning over them, with tears streaming down her cheeks, reminding herself and them, they are the final generation. Sure enough, they will be unfit and incapable of progressing their world. Faith is truly an underrated, unappreciated power.

WLC and Turek demand evidence for the multiverse theory but dont need any for the god hypothesis

In the beginning was the Logic (logos), and the Logic was with God, and the Logic was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. This is the correct rendering of Logos, and the prince of power of the air knows it which is why he tries to convince people it was an accident, no matter how illogical that is.

Multiverse is ad hoc with no evidence, Dr. Craig points out, if anyone doubts it then watch his debates on this topic and you'll see. Ad hoc- For the specific purpose, case, or situation at hand and for no other. Adjective definition: formed or used for specific or immediate problems or needs E.G "ad hoc solutions"

Im confused, how is that an argument against the multiverse?

Failing to understand how it can be A or B doesn't mean it's not. At least we know that chance and physical necessity exist. We don't know that God does. You need to prove the existence of the supernatural before presenting it as a serious option. An obvious option that we can be certain of is that we don't know, even though WLC very confidently states that he does.

Careful now. The multiverse may be a thing. I say this as a Christian. Fractal cosmology may show that multiverse is plausible. It's not this simple. Let's not make us look ignorant.

I believe that God created the universe like a chef would a recipe. While some parts have some violence to them they are orchestrated in a way so that the recipe turns out well.

Designer is the best possible explanation for every known in our reality.

I like how he said that physicists have to **imagine** the multiverse. Because that's all the multiverse "theory" is: imagination.

It's difficult to say anything about a sample of one.

And yet, William Lane Craig doesn't believe the 6 day creation in Genesis 1

One could argue it's fine tuned to produce abiogenesis and evolution as well.

Boaw!

I recently saw a video of a robot folding a shirt. I'm fully convinced that it was assembled by way of an explosion in an electronics factory. Just don't ask me where the factory and parts came from. "We don't know" is supposed to be the reasonable answer for that.

It seems the very fact that the universe must meet certain specifications strongly suggests that God had no other choice but to design it this way, thus is bound by certain external restrictions and would therefore not be the grounding of all things, as theists believe. Furthermore, knowing that life only exists in the tiniest fraction of 0.0000000000000001% of the universe makes the fine-tuning argument quite silly. Imagine... on our planet, there is a gymnasium at an abandoned school in New Brunswick, and inside this abandoned gymnasium there is a basketball in the corner of the room, and inside this basketball lives a colony of flubdubbin garbage mites. If they go outside the basketball they will all suffocate and die. This is the only basketball in the entire world where these mites exist. Does it make sense to say that this planet is perfectly fine-tuned for flubdubbin garbage mites? This is what it sounds like when a creationist says the universe is fine-tuned for human life. Finally (as if there aren't enough holes in this argument ready) the very idea that the universe is fine-tuned says nothing other than... it is fine-tuned. Plugging in a god explanation to explain what we do not yet understand doesn't really have much explanatory power other than, god did it. It doesn't say anything about how it happened. There is no way to objectively verify this claim by testing, making predictions, and most importantly, it is unfalsifiable. If humans remained satisfied with the idea that Zeus threw down lightning from Olympus we never would have discovered electricity. Sometimes the most honest answer is "I don't know" because it gives us permission to explore and investigate what the real answer is. I'm almost 100% confident that the idea of an eternal disembodied mind such as a creator god has been effectively disproven by the very same standard that the creationists use to argue against an eternal universe. The general objection is that if you were to traverse the entirety of the existence of the universe over an infinite past, you would never arrive at today, because you'd always have an infinite time left to go. Wouldn't the mind of a god have thoughts? If you were to observe every thought an infinite being ever had, you would never arrive at the thought to create the universe. It seems the theistic philosophers have been destroyed with their own weapon.

Multiverse is not a hypothesis which tries to explain the observed evidence. Just like panspermia, strong anthropic principle and punctuated equilibrium are not. Rather, every one of these supposed "hypotheses" exists simply and only to try to explain _away_ what we observe.

It's a meaningless topic.

If anyone uses the word infinite in an argument about physics, you can be sure that argument is total garbage.

Atheism is baseless until they can demonstrate our universe began without a great mind behind it. But they can't because it takes a mind to do a demonstration

Thanks CE... Multiverse 😅😂🤣 Sounds like nonsense...

This is a god of the gaps. He doesn’t even attempt to show that premise 2 is true, it’s simply asserted with no evidence

To believe in multi verse is to be a flat earther

To find God you have to search for the truth. To find God you have to know if what you are looking for exists. God is the intelligent creator of the universe. Do you want or don't want God to exist? It is better for you if God exists. For atheists death is the end, without knowing what happened and will happen. To find God you have to understand reality is eternal because from nothing can not be created something. Nothing is absence of existence. Nothing is what innocent and vulnerable children understand by nothing. Something minus something is nothing. Nothing is not something. Nothing is always nothing. Is something always something? Can something be destroyed to become nothingness for ever? Can something destroy self? From substance to eternal emptiness. We know reality is eternal. It's a fact. It's the truth. It's reality. Either the universe is eternal or what created the universe is eternal. Either what has a beginning of existence is eternal or what created what has a beginning of existence is eternal. Either the universe is eternal or God is eternal. You choose with free will. Do you want truth or deception? The truth is atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. To end the war the truth must be known.

Every atheist I've ever talked with bases their belief essentially on "There is no God and I hate him." On the issue of God, evidence and logic don't matter to them.

Hallelujah!!!! The daily Jesus devotional has been a huge part of my transformation, God is good, after years of addiction to drugs and sins God chased me down as I earn $112,500 monthly. My life and family has changed, Thank you Jesus!!!!

Listen up 😊 it takes more to be there and it reminds me of my past when i couldn't get anything done while now i have a home, $88k weekly profit and a lovely daughter!!

Fine tuning argument has been debunked so many times its not even funny. No. Not fine tuned for life. More like life is fine tuned for the universe it originates in. Wow way to get it wrong.