No video :(

Wilson Combat P320 Grip Module Review

Подписаться 250

Просмотров 28 тыс.

50% 1

An in-depth review of the Wilson Combat P320 grip module + a comparison with the original Sig Sauer grip module.
0:00 - Introduction
0:30 - Grip Size
1:10 - Beaver Tail
1:40 - Magwell Flare
2:10 - Magazine Fit
3:38 - Front Tapering
4:23 - Trigger Guard
4:55 - Slide Catch Guard
5:55 - Font & Lettering Style
6:22 - Trigger Guard Undercuts
7:32 - Grip Texture
8:33 - Conclusion / Pros & Cons
11:33 - Final Thoughts on Grip Modules

Опубликовано:

14 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 37

@nashuaovw 13 дней назад

Wilson Combat makes great grip modules. I have one on my P320C - incredibly comfortable in the hand. Much better than the stock Sig grip modules.

@Snapper314 Год назад

I have both of these grips. After a couple of range trips and and many many dry fire and presentation drills I made a choice. I ordered a second Sig Sauer Carry Grip Large for my second P320. It just pointed more naturally for me, while both shot well.

@mongooseguns2679 Год назад

Yep, after more range time I still think the original 320 grip is the best. I use the large as well. Definitely still room for improvement but it just fills up my hand better.

@jeffanon1772 11 месяцев назад

Love my Wilson Combat P320 replacement module...the old style magazines will not seat fully due to the "ears" that match the slots at the grip bottom of the factory module, but it only takes a few minutes to remove the magazine baseplate, use a pair of small diagonal wire cutterd to snipnoff the ears, sand the cuts smooth, & reassemble the magazine...

@thegunstoreguy Год назад

Waiting on my Wilson Combat grip to arrive. Looks very nice on your pistol.

@user-xy6zz7mx8o 2 месяца назад

I have a 250 and this video really helped me decide to go with the Wilson. I have small hands

@Ming-Chan Год назад

I went with the black Wilson combat grip for my M17 as well and I have to admit it has a good aesthetic going for it. Also during the time of me writing this comment, I think Springfield with the new Echelon hit the nail on the head with their grip modules having interchangeable backstraps out of the box, hoping Sig or somebody tries to do the same.

@MrFlamethrower32 Месяц назад

One thing no one mentions, is how cheap the oem coyote p320 modules feel. The black varients feel like they have an extra layer of plastic or something. Meanwhile the coyote is very smooth and feels like a dollar store toy. I bought one and immediately thought i got a knockoff. Paint was peeling on the inside, when i shot it the paint would actually start to melt and drops of paint were in the module. When i shared on the sig subreddit, they all said it was a real module. For $70 that is a slap in the face!

@BOSSm16man 2 месяца назад

I feel like a smoother side makes it a little more comfortable for carry. I have some pretty aggressive texture grips and they eat up my side a little bit and sometimes grabs my shirt when getting out of the car.

@krmtdfrg Год назад

I have the Wilson Combat for the P320 XCompact and I love it on my firearm

@StevenMikey Год назад

Does this one have the safety?

@krmtdfrg Год назад

@@StevenMikey no it does not

@johnhoward3525 Год назад

Wilson FTW all day. Thinner up top where it needs to be, flared magwell helps get a tighter grip without squeezing any harder, texter is far better. Only con is I prefer the square trigger guard. Otherwise, way better and doesn't cost an arm and a leg more than standard.

@DentSideDee71 Год назад

Stamped?

@johnhoward3525 Год назад

@Dee Jay If your talking about the texture, I think it is stamped. Still better than stock IMO. The stock P320 X series though is better.

@jmorefit1 3 месяца назад

Thank you for this comparison!

@mikepurcell9952 Год назад

I think the wilson combat is alot more comfortable

@neilhand4657 7 месяцев назад

LOVE MY WILSON COMBAT MODULE FOR MY COMPACY 320. SURE WISH THEY MADE ONE FOR THE XTEN 10mm!!!!!

@exowolffe1386 6 месяцев назад

did you go with the WC compact or the WC carry?

@johntownley83 4 месяца назад

Do you have a link where you went and got that grip module? I have checked Wilson combat and cannot find this grip module. I also have a m17 and would like to get this grip module but having trouble finding it

@mongooseguns2679 4 месяца назад

Yep, absolutely. I don’t have the exact link on hand, but I got this particular one from MidwayUSA. I also have gotten grips from Midwest Gunworks. Both are great, just make sure the module you get has the safety cut out.

@bhief473 Год назад

Have you considered putting a weight kit in the Wilson combat grip? Was curious what it would weigh

@Duwils Год назад

I love the feel that is nice but not overly aggressive. I also considered the rubberized Talon grip, but think that it would negate the true feel of a WC grip. I have the Carry II with the RXP X-Compact and full-sized 17-round and 21-round mags (great for range not so much for concealment.) I recently got 2 sets of the tungsten weights and while it isn't a huge difference, you can feel the additional weight. I feel like it balances the gun even more. DJM but I was greedy and also got the X-Compact WC Grip Module as well as they were on sale and with the S&H why not. I may get a new FCU and I am debating a Carry X-Change kit for a 2nd P320. The more pronounced beavertail is a blessing and a curse. It is a welcome secure grip while shooting, but a lil annoying when carrying when it shifts. Tip on the weights that I found online - Use a 1" piece of heat shrink tp seat the weights to keep them snug without permanently adding them.

@ezpeezy58 9 месяцев назад

What is the exact model and size for the m17? Is it WCP320 - CARRY? Sorry if it was mentioned...didnt catch it. Thanks.

@mongooseguns2679 8 месяцев назад

Sorry for the late reply - The P320 has 3 categories: Full, Carry, and Compact. Compacts take 15 round mags and higher, whereas Full and Carry take 17 round mags and higher. Carry differs from Full because it has a shorter rail, which is compatible with 3.9” and 4.7” barrel slides. Full frames are only compatible with 4.7” barrel slides and up. The M17 and M18 take the same Carry size frame. So the one you specified is the correct one.

@DentSideDee71 Год назад

The original grip is beautiful don’t get me wrong I just don’t see myself enjoying the flare on the newer one

@meyou6212 Год назад

What's the length of the barrel on the slide you threw on it at the end?

@SlowPokeShootingSports 4 месяца назад

Which grip size is this? I dont see a full size with a safety... All I can find is the carry size

@mongooseguns2679 4 месяца назад

Yeah the names are a bit of a misnomer. The M17 uses a carry size module. The full size will work too, the only difference is the length of the dust cover (the part that covers the guide rod). The grip itself is the exact same size between full size and carry size. The carry size is usually better because it will also work for shorter Sigs like the M18.

@SlowPokeShootingSports 4 месяца назад

@@mongooseguns2679 thanks for the reply! I'm thinking really hard about picking one up!

@daishi9000 Год назад

what lenght slide is that?

@mongooseguns2679 Год назад

This is the standard M17 4.7" slide

@StevenMikey Год назад

Thanks guys this is a question I was going to ask!

@buckeyerob3744 Год назад

Is that a 1911 style slide safety ?

@chelseykamron4143 Год назад

😢 'Promo SM'

@DigitalCity-sj4es 6 месяцев назад

I say this, If Sig thought the grip needed to be like the wilson combat one they would have made it like that, quite a bit of RnD went into this...I think people simply want to change because they assume it will be better and its cool. But function over tacticool is my route.

@mongooseguns2679 6 месяцев назад

I agree. As I've gotten more range time with both modules, I can confidently say the original module is far better than the WC grip.