Woke Tiktoker HATES Britain for its colonial past 

@@simulify8726 like He said, historically accurate. You proved him correct by questioning western historian's narrative. He played the game well. you just played along with him.

century of humiliation

@@carkawalakhatulistiwa your existence is.

I couldn't agree more but, I would add that we are not responsible for the actions of long dead ancestors. Accurate interpretation of historical records is the foundation stone of peace and harmony.

@@brianmcdonald7107 exactly. Forgive but don't forget

He is not wrong though.

@@AndrewDixon69 Nope, he's right abt the tiktok. Just morally void too.

​​@@AndrewDixon69bruh so it's ok to steal from other people put it in a museum and basically colonize them and treat them like animals the border suck the only thing that the British were good at but for some reason they didn't want to do that there because it was hot or something

@@AndrewDixon69 stop stealing stuff and making it your own and rewriting history so it aline with your hypocrisy

​@@AndrewDixon69His thoughts that british didn't wanted the partition is actually wrong , Completely agree that Muslims didn't wanted to live with us , and they wanted a separate country ,but also after three days of independence it was a british who signed the attack on kashmir "OPERATION GULMARGG" , because they wanted partition at every cost , reason being they wanted to control Pakistan and put it as a proxy against the Russians in Xinjiang where they were having nuclear Weapons test.

😂😂😂

"YOU OVERCOOKED HIM YOU SANDWIDCHGSGREG"

"STOP IT, YOU'RE BURNING IT. Bloody amateur."

Yeah it did happen so should I condemn what my ancestors did? Yes, did we treat people as lower caste? No.

@@kennedy072 Yes, the Muslims did.

Yes Muslims treated others as lower​ class @@kennedy072

​@@kennedy072Sure they did. If its a slave its a lower caste

​@@nerminerminerminermislaves in Islamic law are regarded similar to a family member, the practices might've been otherwise but that's not the case for everything.

we are filling rapidly with angry muslims who hate Britain and want revenge, for everything from the Crusades (which were defensive actions), to Afghanistan. I don't think they like Hindus and Sikhs much either. Wonder where British refugees will go if it gets critical. Indians, at least, have a homeland to return to. We don't

We did some bad things to India but without British rule there wouldn’t have been a political union called India. Brits gave India democracy, free press and the rule of law. Brits gave India railway. Between 2016 and 2020 the UK sent £1.9 billion in aid to India..

@@johnxforce4 some bad things 3.5 million people die in famine because of you and you call it some bad things ? That's just the biggest one and we paid for railways you did not do it out of your own pocket.and leave all this also please tell me when you ruled for 200 years in that region British raj was for almost 100 years so when it ended people told you transition will take 5-6 years maybe more for it to be peaceful and all what did you guys do 6 fucking months even our leaders asked British to stay so partition and all the things could go smoothly you royaly fucked it up.and i an indian so from my perspective let's forget all this let's forget partition also now when india was free you guys left india struggled alot for technology development and all that where was Britain ? Don't you think it would have made good impression on Indians if British companies and government were helping out india in development and it would have benefitted you also in long run but no you guys were busy wagging tail for Americans

@@johnxforce4 and 2 billion euros seriously dude ? Who do you think we are pakistan no one asked for your money and first of all Indian government does not accept aid from British it's you people doing all this through ngos and stuff pushing your propaganda in exchange in name of Christianity again which is not welcomed here. And you know what we don't care anymore as a country we are richer than you my kids generation will be richer than you British in personal wealth also and you guys are and will be irrelevant to the world just and american lapdog people acknowledge you because of your past in present there's nothing impressive and future is even more bleak for you guys so i don't have hatred for you people i have pity for what you have become and what future holds for you mini pakistan you will become i am waiting for that day ✌️✌️✌️

you live in Britain because its better than India ....right...

Not always true but you're right for about 99% of it.

While people who watch tiktok claim the opposite

Is the enclave still around?

Not in China

@@buni1934 yes. My dad is an engineer for them

You missed one: Hates England, Scotland and Wales and the indigenous people there.

@@freddiemedley5580 No they are just too stupid and uneducated about Britain to know about northern ireland😂

@@freddiemedley5580 Northern Ireland is part of the UK, not Britain.

@@ChrisR395 Britain is the British isles

Average Hindu comment: check

And very true

@@whitezombie10 Yup. Humans are animals. Just like every other animal on the planet, the strong prey on the weak. Chances are, at some point in history, your ancestors were the strong ones preying on the weak of the time.

not the islamic prophet and his 5 caliphates after him

Not sealand.

@@Damnahh sure you can.

Pakistani always brainwash NRIs that British did that in reality muslim league aked for a separate country

True haha

he keeps saying us....is he saying pak are indians now...very convenient

They probably would have gladly steered clear of Pakistan my friend and I think they tried several times but sadly geopolitics of the time and yes, Russia.. Needed to expand their influence in the region to basically counter the Russian one. I think that was the only ever real value of pakistan.

before 1947 there was no pakistan it was a part of india untill some mughal ka chodal breaked it

Easy answer, the British wear

​@@RaiyanNazif no true answer - Muslim invaders.

Great idea. Lets move our families to Britain and then teach our children to hate it. Only a Pakistani coulf have such a brilliant idea. Coudin marriage does wonders for intellectual development.

Who win? 😂

Facts!

Rhodesia took over Egypt in 1489

@@avus-kw2f213 and turkey doesn't exist am i right?

@@Ralampos no, but they deserved it... wait

@@RalamposYES lol

Repatriation time.....

I hate people who live in the country they supposedly hate due to historical and political reasons

No. He's not British. Clearly he doesn't want the best for people like me, doesn't look like one of me, and sounds like nothing would make him happier than cultural genocide if British people, and he makes this pretty clear in his video. What he is, is a subversive pretender and a national security risk.

Yeah wants to come and enjoy the benefits of the country but doesn’t support or respect the customs of the native population. I’d start deporting people who have that much hate for supposedly they’re own country.

@Fox2 he’s a British Indian, British isn’t an ethnicity. English is.

Because they know that Pakistan is not so good a place to LIVE!

what kinda racist bs are you talking about? Your talking points are literally nazi talking points btw. Embarassing.

((( )))

Or Metatron.

cyrillic and latin alphabets are related symbols like A, M,T,X,O and K are the same , plus others like S and C make the same sound like the sea or the C and Bee and Vee sound similar

@@eioclementi1355 still if someone told me that they were the same id want to shoot them tbh

@@eioclementi1355 Greek alphabet was the base for Cyrillic due to Greek Christian orthodox monks visiting the old Russian empire, when they didn´t have an alphabet

dont blame the religion blame the ppl

Just then? My head went nuts when this tik tok guy said the all of the indian sub continent was one nation. Like, what? Not even under the mughals was all of the sub continent united. Like what the hell is this guy even talking about he literally doesn't know anything at all about history.

@@ceejay1476 in india hindu muslim(Sunni) we hate each other to our core. The only way of peacefull coexistence is ignoring other side existence or u get very rich and untouched by society.

​@@Damnahh no read the Koran first

The Mugals were not the saints the Muslim portray them and not the devils the Hindus potrayed them. They were not there to loot. They were just as native as everybody else as it became there home.

Well.done......a great summary.......South Asian Jingoism is laughable,.almost childish in its delusion....feeble, emotional outbursts.....

​@@billprendgergast8976 what I find laughable is that some of them blame the British for the caste system I used to work with an Indian chef and he told me that the caste system was already in place when the British got there and it comes from all the way back to when Alexander the great conquered the indus Valley

@@Yoshimitsu420 Exactly. In writings from that period the British were appalled.by the caste discrimination and treatment of the untouchables. It still goes on today..Yet the Indians somehow manage to manipulate every problem into 'The British did it'...I have lived in both Japan and India..Japan is possibly 400 years ahead of India and a highly polished civilization. When Indians sprout about how great India is I often retort." Japan had a Shinkansen in 1964. India did not have a single working toilet."

What the hell is bengali? Dont you have any nation to represent?

​@@soumodipkarmakar402You don't know what the British did to Bengalis Almost a million Bengalis died due to a famine artificially created by Winston Churchill. we don't need Whites talking about Indian History, we already know it better

@@prasheel_ashok_shetty 🤡Bengali? No nationality?

​@@prasheel_ashok_shettyDuring the Bengal famine, there was a war. Thanks to the Government of India Act 1935, the British Raj Government in Delhi was not responsible for food and agriculture, that power was transferred to the provincial government now run by Indians. Burma, which was part of the British Empire, and in cases of earlier famines in India supplied rice was now part of the enemy Japanese Empire. Other provinces themselves refused to help Bengal but when the British Rac Central government forced them to help, they all complained that the British Raj Government is breaking the Government of India Act 1935. PM McKenzie King of Canada offered to send grain but Churchill argued that it would take a lot of time so instead ordered Australia to send 440000 tons of wheat to Bengal in the middle of a World War. He also did a grain swap with Sri Lanka or Ceylon. 50000 tons of grain blew up in Bombay docks. Viceroy of India, Lord Wavell on seeing the situation, called in the Indian Army in the middle of the war to distribute food. Since most of the soldiers were North Indians eating primarily wheat based bread or roti and most Bengalis were rice eaters, the population had to be trained. Also Hindu Marwari merchants were hoarding grain even when Bengalis were dying all around them as they were connected to Congress and wanted to destabilize the ruling Muslim majority party of Bengal, the Krishak praja Party. Know real history not anti British Congressi propaganda.

@@prasheel_ashok_shetty bro it was a fucking cyclone. And the British+ Dominions shipped hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of tons of grain to India in an attempt to alleviate the famine while at the same time Britain was almost starving.

We do learn our history but the version that our government and intellectuals want us to learn. For example in Mexico they teach us all about the native civilizations but nothing about the history of Spain, who conquered the land and started our national culture. They just casually teach us that the Spaniards came out of nowhere for no reason, just to plunder the land

Some of these countries are controlled by totalitarian regimes who obviously don't want their people to really learn about the historic truth.

German bro we know our history very well than u bcoz it is well recorded every moment, who r u preaching to look at u, how stupid u were wanted to conquer whole world 😂 f'd up by allies

Exactly 💯

We do. Its just that everyone else sleeps through those classes

Aren't you angry if the British deliberately drew a map in one month and gave cashmere to India without clear boundaries and made the two countries go to war and some of Pakistan's GDP had to be used for the military. they also do the same thing to Palestine

@@carkawalakhatulistiwa If they could have, Indians would have done the same

@@carkawalakhatulistiwa the Israel Palestine issue happened because the Arabs refused division of Palestine.Israel was even ok with sharing Jerusalem with the Arab palestine, but the Arabs refused. and stop watching too much zakir naik. that terrorist is going to get you killed someday . if you want your own good , report him to authorities for acts of inciting violence.

finally , something we can agree on. and what are your views on the pakistani history textbooks controversy?

@@carkawalakhatulistiwa no matter how they drew it, both sides would not agree. War is the only solution to those that refuse conciliation.

What is the use of Taj Mahal? Nothing. It just became a tourist attraction. Also, because of the Mughal Empire that many Indians were forced to convert to islam and eventually became the reason why it has been divided into 3 countries.

Taj Mahal was a Hindu Temple actually .. the Mughals brought nothing but persecution and death .. the british brought science and technology

#sedlyf

Those Turkic/ moguls were bad boys !

He should have let some of his conquered subjects live, built a global media empire to amplify their grievances, and established a banking system to empower them. *Then* he'd be well known like funny-mustache-man, and the ADL would hound his ancestors forever.

He didn't just die. He cursed his own tomb that anyone who would try to unearthen his resting place will be cursed with endless cycles of Death. USSR under Stalin did that. and we all know what happened next.

@@patriotenfield3276 just came for this comment

It's not really mental gymnastics, it's the academic dogma of our age. Like I guess you can call it mental gymnastics, but understand that the universities are literally teaching them to do those specific gymnastic moves.

There is also a post-colonialism created Eden-like fantasy, as in " everything will be fine now that we have chased the evil colonizers". There are many examples that prove the opposite.

cause the truth makes non whites look really really bad

Wakanda 😂

The only skills shown by this guy is his avoidance of historical reality. He knows nothing about reality, never mind history. He thinks historical reality is a morality play, and all he wants to know is not what happened, but who are the goodies and baddies. This is a caricature of history-but he prefers to wallow in his ignorance and stupidity. I'd bet good money this gut has never been near a library but did his research via ignorant You Tube and Tik Tok postings.

It's a dump that's why they came to India soon it will return to it's glory of swamps as it always was and people will leave the dump 😂😂😂

Might? Dude I live in the states and we’re on the same exact sinking ship.

why are you replying to yourself@@aaacsacahh9088

you are right well i am a indian and when it came to history indian education system only blame british but never try to touch mughals

@@vaibhavthakur9234 well then it prove that indians are not one people or nation

@@vaibhavthakur9234 okya look i agree that indians have same roots but indians are so much differente from one an another that they are like different nation china and europe are genetically homogeneous then india

@@vaibhavthakur9234 they look bit differente not completly different and that can be say about chinese like northern han chinese are taller and lighter then southern han chinese but the truth is truth india is more like africa then anything like europe or china besite from genetics i think for nation to be unite they alaways need some kind of force in india case mughal and british empire unite it and in china's case mongal and manchu unite it

How many Indians did the British nobility or royals marry? Let's be real they thought of Indians as a lesser race.

Artificial boundaries are pretty much a colonial concept, in the past there were Kingdoms under an Empire based on logical natural geographical boundaries, no straight lines.

Yeah true! Political leaders changed under several Dynasties but culture remained intact more or less!😅

Except for where the different cultures had a tradition of killing each other over religion.

@@richardrutter9605 like what?

@@AnoopSingh-sq2po en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_India

yep

I'd say 100% at this point. Even the top ones get more stuff wrong, at least in this area

then why queen hadn't apologised for the sins of British empire.

@@Mrinal-og6tg Why haven't the descendants of other empires ( Muhgal,Han, Sassanid, Russian, Spanish,French and especially Belgian) apologised?

@@nigelbagguley7606 Exactly, he won't respond cause he's got no other points. Plus he doesn't know about her 'dont explain don't complain ' policy

He would but the UK won't leave his country alone that's the problem. Oh and the UK is biggest shithole on earth

Many people said that to your grandparents but they didn't.

@@unknown-mx9it oh man😂😂😂

​@@unknown-mx9it Just nailed it bro

If you don't like brown people and especially Indians then return our antiques which are in that THIEF MARKET aka British museum and return that Kohinoor

Lol 😂

😂😂

😂 👍

😂👍🏻

Agreed 💯👍

I also find it interesting that he doesn't expand on *who* taught him this. It certainly wasn't the British school system, I can tell you that for free. His racist parents are who taught him that and that is somehow Britain's fault.

The tensions between Indians and Pakistanis occurred before the Brits were involved in India. It’s ironic, hilariously embarrassing, but anti-British for a Pakistani to try and claim that the disunity between Indians and Pakistanis only occurred because of Britain, when it was the Muslims in India that pushed for their own state because they didn’t want to be ruled by a non-Muslim majority. He is playing on an anti-white, anti-British, anti-western narrative that because Indians are Pakistanis are both South Asian and ‘brown’ then they must have always seen themselves as united brothers, when it was their huge cultural differences that distinguish them from each other more than anything.

Indeed !

Leicester, (no to long ago), became majority non English, (and I mean English), with massive imported foreign problems... Birmingham, (though not far behind), is minority English, (and I mean English), and again, with massive imported foreign problems... little to non of the foreign people's who settled in England, were ever assimilated & absorbed by the native population... and thus, are still foreign people's... who clearly have imported their foreign problems to our land... England. As an Englishman... there is one fraise which will always be said by us Englishmen long after England ill's have been purged, and that is... *"We were never asked"!*

He's a pakistani.

Dude both this Mughal offshoot and the white pompous brit both were colonisers of our country and looted our country dry. And they would do it again if given the opportunity. So don’t be so naive, decolonize your mind and stand up for yourself and your community. Set your own narrative and don’t let these outsiders set the narrative.

Muslims never colonised India, it was conquest.

He’s chatting nonsense. How much do you even know about Indian history?

@Abdur I know enough! What I do agree with is if british are evil for colonizing india, then so are mughals! I dont see much of a difference in terms of atrocities. Past is past, and the future is what matters and indias looks 👌

@@arijitnath9626 India is doing itself now because they have a large working population and a thriving economy and it’s getting stronger. Empires have always invaded and killed, there are good and bad in all empires. “I know enough” lol typical response from someone who doesn’t know enough!

As a arab you fell superior of all races. After all you are the true descendents of ismael. 😂

There are a lot of words this type of person love to throw around without understanding (or perhaps not caring) what the actual meaning behind the words are.

It´s just a tactic to shut down uncomfotable opinions in the west.

It’s not about being racist You can’t justify your occupation of a whole subcontinent just because some other people did it Especially if you are not even from the same continent or have the same culture I don’t support either of them but you can see that he is super pro Britain as if they were angels

That's not even mentioning the Royal Navy's West Africa Squadron, which patrolled the Atlantic and captured slave ships, freeing 150,000 or so slaves in the process. True it was inefficient and disease was rampant, but what can you expect when, for the longest time, they were pretty much alone in doing this and had next to nothing to gain from this?

You have been had, LOL

Romans: *Sorry I couldn't hear you over this decisive Roman victory*

"I use tiktok" {Translate} "I'm a fucking idiot"

@@fvckgoo9le242 haha this is music to my ears

You should just rephrase ‘surface level history’ to propaganda.

He should be expelled to his native homeland. After all, he shows far more loyalty to Pakistan than the UK.

Hmm could have said the same about India before Britan threw us under the bus

@@yedhukrishnan6700 Always someone else's fault, isn't it...

@@yedhukrishnan6700 No you couldn't lol

​@@yedhukrishnan6700unless you were a widow, then you would be burned like a witch...

But isn’t this like the idea of Europe or the Holy Roman Empire. More a concept than a nation for most of history

Stay woke, beloved❣️

I don't agree with reparations as well but due to entirely different reasons. First of all England can never pay back for all the atrocities and tyranny committed here. Putting a monetary cap on those would be disrespectful to all those who have died due to the unfair governance during colonial times. Secondly, reparations in the form of apologies would be much more appreciated than some sum of money. Thirdly, even if England wanted to give monetary payment, whom would it be given to - the raj has been divided into India, Pakistan, bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan and Pakistani economies are falling so they might need some aid, but India and Bangladesh don't. And, these are not the only countries who were colonised. If, England starts giving reparations to all the colonised countries in monetary form, it would go into debt. Improving trade relations and investing in those economies would be much better than going the other route.

The Anglo-Saxons stole 45 trillion dollars of the South Asian subcontinent. Whether they pay it back is a separate matter.

Similar thing to the black Americans who want reparations. They're happy to ignore the millenia of slavery perpetrated by Africans on other Africans, but since the white people bought people who were already enslaved by their own race, suddenly white people have to cough up money for it

dumbest reasoning to keep all the artifacts

​@@farukhsheikh5790 May I ask one thing, What's an Apology gonna do? We Indians need no apology. It would be crocodile tears anyway.

Indeed. Also what people did to their own people were different back then, then what we would do now. yes as well that many other countries and cultures were trying to invade. As far I have had history the Mongolians tried to come into Europe. Other European countries invaded other European countries. The Ottoman Empire try to come into Europe as well. Yet these were often forgotten or people just didn't care about it because we don't pretend to have an innocent history because we very well know that no single country/culture has an innocent history. That also helps. I just hope people will never do it again... although Russia is now invading Ukraine, but that was the leader that decided that the people were all surprised. I guess it's always the elite. The rest of the people are always surprised. I am just happy to know that my family never left my homeland at least not back to 1400s.

Just like in a few years we will forget about what USA did in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and people will forget about what Russia is doing in Ukraine.

​@@Lipi9148 yes.

​@@Lipi9148 majority of people these days don't even know that the Soviets invaded Afghanistan too, or even know that the US lost the war in Vietnam.

@@johnr797 I find it hilarious when western countries lecture Asian and African countries and teach us how to live, how to think and set rules for how democracy should be and all they do is invade other sovereign nation for pure selfish reasons and trade with non-democratic nations.

It’s basically mass mentality heckling. People who are driven purely by a toxic combination of slogans, fallacies, buzzwords and emotionalism.

The people who spread that nonsense are the same people who spread Scottish independence. They will fracture this world with their ideologies and everyone will end up bankrupt. The Welsh and Scottish economies are built up by England, if the union collapses, ALL members would suffer. The people who spread this ideology are the ones trying to attain power for themselves by breaking away like that Scottish b*tch (I don't remember her name). The reason they say such things is to put themselves in a better position, not necessarily everyone else.

@@meekos699 verry true.

To be fair, the Welsh had it really good. It still exists, most countries conquered 700 years ago don’t exist, let alone keep their history, language and culture.

@@maxdavis7722 Not for lack of trying though. It truly is a testament to the indomitable will of the remaining Celtic people that they still exist at all. If they were pretty much any other people the Welsh and Irish would've been completely erased/assimilated, just like the rest of the Britons in modern day England and Scotland, or like the Gauls in modern day France.

@@ryujin9568 that’s very unlikely. Suggesting that every other group that didn’t survive to this point simply weren’t as tough or resilient as the celts is really just an insult to them. It’s much more likely that the English just cared much less about homogeneity in their nation (which is generally pretty much true, it’s very individualist and hasn’t done much historically to force the English together). England also recognised the Welsh people very early on, the Welsh really didn’t have to do much fighting to exist, the English gave it to them during the Tudor period. Finally the celts are not resilient at all, they dominated most of Europe and lost pretty much all land they covered.

India was called Golden bird" Capital of spirituality and trade Birthplace of major Eastern rlgns Look what b.r.i.t. did

just because you saw one bridge from british time does not mean all bridges built by british have survived for 100 years. try to understand the bias in our observation.

Akbar was the only tolerant among them. and despite being tolerant,he destroyed many temples in chitoorgarh just to show Maharana Pratap how much he is powerful.

No man, I agree with most of what he said. But EIC stealing trillions is mostly true. If you are really Indian, you should what they did to our farmers for growing spices and cotton. (Spices were like gold at the time). Also, the Idea of India existing long back even though for most of its history, India was in pieces. There are mentions of unified India in texts.

There is some truth to the tik tok guys narrative as well bengal famine did happen. British slaughtered a lot of indians. Also Kashmir they left it unresolved and india and Pakistan are in indefinite arms race while the rest of the world gets real development.

Ignorance is not an excuse.

@@geraldg350 yeah, it's a mistake

Yeah why should a British school teach the history of India?? If you want all of the world you have to stay in school for all your life

@@whitezombie10 you don't have to stay in school all your life, but committing to that fact will teach the history of the world.

They also censor in US. So...

It's almost like they expect lo leave high school with a Phd in each subject. And sometimes they do teach X subject matter, but people fail to recognise they were not interested at all, or were probably complaining about "what am I gonna use this for in real life?", or the teacher constantly had to stop the class to address disruptive students. BTW "What am I gonna use this for?"... I graduated high school in '97. History is not my livelihood, but it certainly keeps me entertained during my spare time and helps me get a better understanding about current issues, countries, cultures, etc.

You are not Indian.

@@abhinandsnath Well you guessed by the username. Fair assumption I’d say but there are plenty of Christians here so he could be Indian

@@harshvardhanmankotia6492 Yeah. But it's not the usual Indian Christian name.

@@abhinandsnath what is the usual indian christian name? jai john, williams pandey, george thakur?

@@harshvardhanmankotia6492 it could be a made up name.

Do you mean the owner of this channel?

Yes…wait is he British? Did I just make a racist comment? I’m sorry

@@justinbowers2749No, he’s not.

Then that’s on me, apologies

Ok history professor or so called expert

@@srgplay4526 Did he say he was a professor or expert? No. No he did not. He hasn't even given his opinion on the matter, which equates to his beliefs.

@@plantboy6249 so why do u mind what I reply/comment just fk off

Really give us back our 45 trillion😂😂

The Indians that fought the Japanese to save the Brritish Raj reading your comment: 👁👄👁

@@netaji-thebritishslayerif they had 45 trillion dollars in the past they would have conquered the world 🤡

​@@netaji-thebritishslayer what equation led you to that figure?

@@netaji-thebritishslayer That figure is literally a lie, youd know where it comes from if you watched the vid - which you didn't.

Disagree

Saying something like "Muslim" colonisers is same as saying "Christians" colonised Europe. Which though is true to some extent but is very different from British colonialism of Asian and African countries where British were invaders and not natives to the land. They were racially motivated to commit acts of racial violence against people of the land and consider them as not equal humans. They looted from their counties and made themselves rich and then they made a run back to their countries leaving the natives of the colonies to die from famine. Muslims were almost always natives of the land they ruled. They never took the wealth out other nation in most cases and made the areas they ruled as their country or capital, they didn't rule from London from example. So the analogy put by him was wrong and unacceptable.

@@blackpanthar906 Jesus Christ dude, so because the motives were racially based instead of ethnicity based, the r4 p3, pillage, murder & conquest is all ok then?the analogy works fine, you just don’t like it

@@blackpanthar906 “Muslims were always natives” no, the Hindus were there first as they always have been “The Muslims never took wealth out of the country” again, categorically false, they also destroyed idols & temples filled with gold “They never ruled from a far away place like London” so because they moved in & started ruling over everyone, it makes all of this just fine?

@@blackpanthar906 sorry Muslims of india still can't live with hindus..imagine how brutal Muslim invaders were...British empire was way better then Muslim invaders....

They need to go back

@@ImWatchingYou69 you can’t do jack shit to make them leave, seethe

@Michelle-bm5pg If I moved to India and then cried about how it doesn't feel like home would you keep the same energy

@@WhiteSage2 i dont think you would be deported though would you?

@@plantboy6249 and why shouldn’t you be?

facts

Indians and Dogs not allowed us a myth. There is zero proof something like this existed.

Indians and dogs not allowed was a myth.

Lol this isn't whataboutary😂 This is just basic facts.if you think the Pakistani guy is telling the truth then you might wanna get your brain checked.

​@JamesMacDonald-dy6mythey did nothing with them Tamil never genocide them It was only a trade dispute Tamils didn't ruled anywhere in Indonesia

Yeah, ALL empires, no exceptions

No there is a difference between degree of evil. Islam categorically teaches non believers as worse than animals. Same can't be said about hindu or Buddhist belief. Hindus welcomed even Jewish and persian refugees. Has any islamic country welcomed any non muslim refuge, thry don't even allow muslims from other sect.

He said only maurya United india, what about Maratha?? He just lied. Brits got it from them. Not from “broken” country. Having kingdoms isn’t broken. It’s normal. Europe has broken countries by languages even today. Even with major differences, india is more united, even back then, they had relative peace amongst different people. It was NOT game of thrones like world back then. He just lied. And he’s got no idea about d 45 trillion calculations. He was taught that Raj gave india modernity, not decimated textile, academic, naval/shipping, metallurgy industries. No mention of ethnic cleansing of people by destroying d gurukul/temple related industries. No mention of wiping out nature and species in india. No mention of forcing Hindumisic propaganda to neuter entire civilization over d century. And on and on… He’s obviously clueless.

@Stardust Meant To Shine No he's not.

evil? this lie of racism was and still with us so he's thinking what happened in india stopped that still the trend today. ' now they changed to more confusion they don't know anything else racism is like a runaway train . look when they had to leave mozambique did the destroy the infrastructure of the country that how they operate its not a matter of countries suffered by conquering nation. this criminal belief of racism don't want the world to live a normal life just for their benefits. when you had your education and a nice life through racism you can be bias and if you were always in a subservient or brought up in that environment as person that from india you will agree even if you live with the racists for so long

"Overall sentiment of Indian People is always against the invaders before the British". Please don't speak for all the Indian people when you want to vent out your hatred/bigotry and butt hurt ego.

Thanks for your racism !!

The British were worse than the Nazis. Thats also a fact. I hate how the British will deny that lol. The British will pay for their crimes. Dont need to say anything else lol.

@@wingaard idk why but why is it so hard to accept that british empire was not some gods empire that saved everyone....they were wrong as much as mughal empire but somehow just stating facts makes him (the above comment) racist?

Bro this tiktoker is an idiot Pakistani. Who thinks the partition was done by Brits by actually his grandfather voted for partition which was jinnahs idea for two nation theory. I am glad his grandfather went to pakistan. And this dude escaped pakistan only to destroy the good democracy of Britain. As an Indian I am feeling lucky.

They could but the British fucked everything up to even let Indians enjoy anything. I mean it was the greatest source of revenue for that nation so...your welcome i guess?

They waged a war to join nit not a option

yes but when you been together for so many years in the british era why you have to choise to divide india again...so it was a logic choise to vote for keep all princely states together

@@razoo911 what?

Bro not 500 there were 1000

Iron man of India.❤

Yep. He has a no bias approach which is good

Nah, Robert Sepher has that spot, but yeah, this guy is good.

@Stardust Meant To Shine elaborate

@Stardust Meant To Shine I appreciate your explanation. I believe this youtuber is trying to give a neutral(ish) perspective and simply give the correct facts on the matter (which he doesnt always do right). I dont think he is justifying the British Empire, but simply explaining that there is no point in hating Britain as a nation, as you might as well hate everyone.

Honest? No he's not.

@PedroOrtega1993 na. Europe. Because most of the people of the subcontinent were united by a common political entity in the past, just like how a lot of Europe was under the Roman empire.

@@riichobamin7612 Not like Europe. Else SovietUnion would have never collapsed. As Bharatiya, Our history, believes, needs, comfort, our administrative concept (such as Panchayat system), social systems (Learn about Varn system), policies, law... has a sync. You won't know that if you surround yourself with fantasies made you by fake European historians. (Back in British era they were obsessed with pushing everything within 5000year time frame to hold on to AdamEve time frame) All this nuisance, began after Sepoy mutiny, to create gap between social classes, upper cast, lower cast, AryanInvasion, Lemuria.... Goes on... Attempts still continue...

@@riscnx bro did you even read my comment ? Also you are REALLY mainland India-centric. Come to my home state of Arunachal. We NEVER had any "Varna" system here. Before 1947, there was no "sync" between us nd mainland India. Same goes for states like Nagaland, Mizoram and Meghalay. As well as Sikkim. And you speak about "fantasies". And I said that Roman Empire had ruled a "lot of Europe", that is why there is a LOT of similarities between the languages and cultures of Spain, Italy, France etc, just like how their is a LOT of cultural similarities between UP, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar. People from these states can EASILY shift between them and will require minimum amount of cultural and linguistic adjustment. Whereas, say, if a Haryanavi person wants to shift to Kerela, the cultural and linguistic adjustments will be greater, and if he/she wants to shift Arunachal or Nagaland, then the cultural and linguistic adjustment will be same as moving into a different country because of the racial, historical, cultural and linguistic differences. And that is why I was comparing India to a united Europe. Just like how their is minimal cultural and linguistic differences between the states of Hindi belt, the same applies to the countries that were integral in the Roman Empire (Italy, France, Spain and Portugal). The linguistic diffence between these countries is minimal as these languages are more or less derived from Vulgar Latin. And same for their cultures. Next time read the comment properly, don't let your jealousy and hatred for Europe/West cloud your judgement, and learn about India properly.

@@riichobamin7612 Dude I hope you notice that Nomads and tribes don't have Varna system, in fact it's not even meant for them? Be it anywhere in India, Banjara, Gurjar, Swaran, Adi or Apatani. I agree North east had major demographic shifts in last thousand years. In fact many fresh settlement of many nomadic groups & tribes. But despite that settled communities of Assamese followed exact same system. And no, Roman Empire is not what you think. Beyond the walls of Roman cities, Roman Empire was just like any other Barbarian village. Rome had not control or local administrative muscle. Rome was just an urban centric civilisation. India & China have always been different, we had very well established hierarchical systems. The administration structure was identical all over India, Even British operated in same structure, which is why they managed to expand so quickly, and local populations had not problems.

@@riscnx bro, you are COMPLETELY missing my point. 1. To counter your "Rome was just urban centric", so were all Indian empires that controlled majority of the Indian subcontinent. That is why there is such diversity in India. We often joke that languages change every 50KM or so in India. Why do you think that is ? It is because all pan-India empires like the Gupta, Maurya, Mughal, Maratha, British India etc were also urban centric. 2. Not all settles communities follow the Varna system in north-east. My father's tribe, the Apatani, have been settled for centuries. We have private properties and paddy fields that go back generations. And we had no clue what Varna system was until 1947. 3. You fail to see similarities between the Republic of India and a hypothetical united Europe. (A.) You can equate the countries of the Romance languages (French, Spainish, Italian and Portuguese) with the Hindi belt. These countries are linguistically similar, just like the states of the Hindi belt where the lingua franca, i.e. Hindustani, is spoken albeit with different regional dialects. (B.) You can compare the Slav and the Germanic people with the Dravidian group. Another major linguistic group who share more in common with their own fellow Slavic(Serbian Croatian, etc) /Germanic (the various tribes of Germany)/Dravidian (Tamils, Kannadiags, Telgu) ethnic groups than they with the Romance/Hindi belt group BUT still share lots of history together due to a large empire like the Roman (for Europe) and the Gupta, Maurya and the Mughal (for Indian subcontinent) that ruled them all together for some time atleast. (C.) You can compare the Sami, a minority group in various nordic countries, with the various tribes of north east due to the fact that they are a minority w.r.t. population, culture and language. Do you have any more disagreements ?

And yet, the ability of the Sanatana Dharma to absorb the light from all sources (which was the pluralism that Mahatma Gandhi and Swami Vivekananda supported) has allowed it prosper. Despite the harms committed by Islamic invasions in the North (people like Aurangzeb were particularly problematic), there were also more harmonious interactions in the South as well as in many parts of the North thanks to the pluralistic efforts of people such as Kabir and even Emperor Akbar (to a certain extent). I would also say that British rule was significantly worse than any other major Empire as it was during their period when India's economy stagnated and declined. During the Mughal era and before, it was one of the largest in the world. The Mughals did not carry the Taj Mahal out of India. Throughout history, people have faced opposition when they tried to express the truth. Prophet Muhammad was famously forced to escape from Mecca to Medina in order to escape persecution. The early Christians faced animosity from both the Jews and the Romans. What was done to the Jews during the 20th century is not hidden from most individuals. India, and Sanatana Dharma, have thankfully had and incorporated ideas such as Advaita Vedanta and Anekantavada that have helped it see the truth in more than one location. The Islamic view of Wahdat al Wujud has some interesting points of agreement with Advaita (particularly on the idea of the unity of being). Of course, we should not be ignorant and pretend that Islamic extremism and other threats do not exist. I only hope that such issues can be resolved through a meaningful dialogue rather than potentially immensely destructive conflicts that would cause a loss of much that is valuable. 🙏🇮🇳☮️☮️

While we blame the British we don’t see the plank in our own eyes. The biggest enemy was not Mughals, British, Portuguese or Persians or Greeks. It was Hinduism itself! Caste wickedness brought us to our knees. That’s why we couldn’t fight not defend. We were already beaten and burdened by the society. Still you are not wantin to accept this fact.

The British rediscovered alot of your lost architecture and did alot of archeological digs to preserve your history. Have you ever watched Praveen Mohan he travels all through India to study your temples, and other ancient sites. He gives the French,and British Officers and Explorers credit for rediscovering the ancient sites and helping preserve them. He says the Muslim Invaders tried to destroy alot of the Sacred Temples and even tried to outlaw other Religions such as Hinduism, that's why there were wars. The British Never outlawed The Hindu Religion or destroyed your ancient architecture! It is good that India is becoming a stronger country, I'm proud that India is America's ally and I'm glad you're Not China's ally. America could hate the British for what they did to our country and my ancestors could hate them for what they did to Ireland, but it's Not anyone living today that's at fault, or anyone living today suffering from those times.

​@@michellerichardson1427lol rediscover architecture? While robbing everything else? The Mughals integrated into India, the British robbed India blind.

I can't take anybody who says "Britisher" seriously. And you are still at risk? 🤣 stfu the only people India is at risk to is its own people

Because he's very safe in UK

Mate this guy is gem. He always presents opinions which are different from the mainstream bootlickers

@@abhishekanand3067 is he He thinks British Empire united india then what the fuck is Bharat.

He thinks india was always divided because india has some 300 language and people have different skin color. Look how is he whitewashing British atrocities.

Typical orientalist.

Well truth be told a big part of India is populated by proto-aryans who migrated into India from... Central Asia (weird huh?) that pushed out and displaced Dravidians to the South and settled in their place. So your point is kinda moot. Doesn't matter if Mughal rulers where not ethnic Indians (whatever that means. Technically there is no such thing as an Indian ethnicity, race, culture or religion. It's a patchwork of hundreds if not thousands of ethnicities). India as a "Nation" was kinda invented when the English created the British Indian Empire. In short, every nation is another nation's "invader" and not one is exempt of the sin of domination. Some rulers in history are individually worst than some others, but don't let that overshadow the achievements of the other "good" rulers that existed in every dynasty line.

LOL, i guess you don't know the history of anywhere apart from india. Google up who khalid ibn al walid was.

@@moorishwarrior341 stfu mulla. I don't care about your history. For the umpteenth time don't shove your history up everywhere. This wasn't even about you lol.

@Abhi This shows how intellectual you are just like your prime minister who identifies people by their clothes lol. Don't give too much stress on your Lil brain. I knowy history from neutral sources, not like your school books where Maharana Pratap and shivaji were the mightiest rules of the world who defeated Mughals🤣🤣

@@moorishwarrior341 Bro you serious? That's clearly Hindu flags behind him . Saffron in colour and triangle shaped

@@rrajputofficial5024 I was replying to the original post that peshwa baji Rao wasn't the only undefeated general in the subcontinent as claimed by the guy

Because you are one

@@dharmatejareddy. If someone who says truth is sanghi then i am proud sanghi 🙏🏻

Same here bro!

​@@dharmatejareddy.get a brain

@@dharmatejareddy. congee 🧢

As an Indian you're right, the partition was needed or else india would have become another yugoslavia

you really think that? India has more than 200 million muslims still, are they still fighting against each other? Except politicians, I don't think anyone really hates muslims except because they are viewed as Pakistani and the media constantly discriminates against them. Muslim League was created by handful of landlord and Nawabs who felt that THEY wouldn't be represented, not the majority of the population. It's same as the Russian revolution where not the oppressed and underrepresented people fight for equality and justice,, but a handful of radicals that imposed their ideology to everyone.

@@CoolManCoolMan123 you're out of touch with reality

@@glitchboi3537 tell me how am I out of touch with reality?

@@CoolManCoolMan123 India still has Muslims left. What about Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh? They are barely existent there and are declining rapidly. Without the partition, there would have been events like Rawalpindi riots, Noakhali Massacre and Direct Action Day, and probably even a civil war.

Bro All the Invasions, be it European, Central Asian, or Islamic, were plundering India. They didn't directly want to benefit us from it. British Education and Railway was there to help Britain exploit India's Resources. Mughals spent so much on their own entertainment (The Gardens, the palaces) that no one wanted India to Benefit, be it the Mughals, the British, or other Europeans. This guy is justifying Colonialism by taking a rant on British. He is bashing the other guy for cherry-picking the facts, but he himself is cherry-picking British deeds amongst atrocities and sugarcoating colonialism.

Nonsense. Mughals couldn't break Indian spine. Brits did it easily by converting India and pausing its progress, ruining it's culture for 70 years

They made them for themselves not for you

@@Timeisless Who are using it now? … Them or us?

@@Helicopter007no one. That’s gone. What people are using now is something made by themselves for themselves. Are we to thank somebody who stabbed us for giving us a free knife?

Not even a "weekender", more like a boozy Friday night

@@willbass2869 yeah

the weekend historian is history legends, it is shocking for him to make a historical rant video where he gets so many basic facts wrong. the tiktoker is definitely more cringe and inaccurate, history legends is only a short distance behind him

@@jewishmafiosiandganglord6930 3 likes btw

It's only a shame if one values every opinion one encounters equally. Educated people who are ignorant by bias exist. Can't avoid need to critically think

Well said.

@@subhajit201 you mean the man which was discharged from the army, and after the local population were put under curfew but refused to comply? Due to violent protests. And which massacre do you mean? The larger Muslim one? Or the smaller British one? Don't spread your lies here

The British carried out several massacres of unarmed Indian civilians, including the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in 1919, where British soldiers opened fire on a peaceful crowd of protestors in Amritsar, killing over 1,000 people.

@@vedantbelurkar why do you care more about a lesser massacre which was an accident than a deliberate one between Muslims and Sikhs?

and it was visa versa

Their mindset of raping and killing hindus only because their holy books says kill the pegans and invade their land (quran chapter 9 verse 6 and many more).........and history of hindus heing raped and inslaved massacred are the reasons.....we have hard feeling for isl@m and their's radical followers .

So you see, the problem

It had to do more with Post partition politics and the politicisation of Muslims by pakistan. Pakistan used religion as a justifying tool to do everything against India. Even in kashmir they used religion as a motive to invade.

@TT vice versa.

maybe because hindus were massacred outright by the islamic empires - I mean why should I feel nnice to a minority which gets appeased in every single elction - have made their own sharia law as civil law . their descendants in india had ancestors who voted for pakistan , they support pakistan in cricket match . why on earth should I care if they are hated coz they deserved it

Sas thing is, they wanna cancel him because he left the ukrainian bias long ago.

😂 He said only maurya United india, what about Maratha?? He just lied. Brits got it from them. Not from “broken” country. Having kingdoms isn’t broken. It’s normal. Europe has broken countries by languages even today. Even with major differences, india is more united, even back then, they had relative peace amongst different people. It was NOT game of thrones like world back then. He just lied. And he’s got no idea about d 45 trillion calculations. He was taught that Raj gave india modernity, not decimated textile, academic, naval/shipping, metallurgy industries. No mention of ethnic cleansing of people by destroying d gurukul/temple related industries. No mention of wiping out nature and species in india. No mention of forcing Hindumisic propaganda to neuter entire civilization over d century. And on and on… He’s obviously clueless.

They lived and spent the money in India: for themselves! And... by what right did they suppress Indians?

paxtanys getout of britain is number 1 trend in UK now

Yeah, his ancestors voluntarily came. If he doesn't like it, he can go back

He doesn't have a visa

@@nledaig then kick him

@@whitezombie10 Why? I don't go around kicking dafties. He was born in the UK.

Why is he hated for the Bengal famine? He's not a god who can prevent natural disasters, and also the British system could mitigate this if not for Japanese invading Burma to cut off supplies and a world war literally being fought.

@@TheSm1thers Don't forget that also Bengal suffered multiple famines before and after Churchill, but it's much easier for people to ignore context and find someone else to blame for any misgivings.

@@MrBannystar Exactly, and he even tried to address the problem by sending someone over to take charge of the situation and trying to get aid from allies despite being so restricted at the time with what could be done.

@@TheSm1thers because Britain ruled India and still extracted crops from during this time. If you rule people, you are responsible for its governance and if you take food away from starving people, erm… you’re probably at fault. There were other famines in British colonies but why not in Britain?

@@Smashedpuppet "There were other famines in British colonies but why not in Britain?" To reverse it: There was a Blitz in Britain but why not India? Do you see how silly that line of logic is? Not all parts of a global empire are going to be affected by all events in the same way.