WORLD IN CONFLICT - UNIT HISTORICAL INACCURACIES 1989 - PART 3 FINALE [BONUS] 

Note: I accidentally misidentified the Kamov KA-25, as an MI-25. It’s an error, that I should have looked out for.

Hello, I really liked your video, one of the things I would like you to talk about is that the C-141 and IL-76 fly very low and that the Soviet air carriers carry AK-47s when they should carry the AKS-74N and RPG. 18

Thanks for the video, comrade) I didn't even know that there were American ATGMs and machine guns in the Soviet fortifications

With regards to the ranges of the various units in game, every RTS or RTT game does this. This range compression is done to make the game playable, balanced, and intuitive for the user, not every game can or should be an ARMA like simulation, they're meant for fun. For the small squad sizes and non-standard uniforms this is something I can see as possible, since in real-life wars the dress code quickly becomes more of a suggestion as stocks of new uniforms get drawn down for conscripts and sometimes one for one replacements for damaged articles of clothing is not possible. The small squad sizes are something we do also see on both sides in the Ukraine War as heavy manpower losses and the prevalence of heavy fire support have reduced most squads down to 4-6 dudes. I remember seeing some Russian Assault infantry manual about how a typical storm squad would have like 2-3 guys with LMGs and RPGs covering 2-3 riflemen in an assault because the modern battlefield is so deadly anything bigger is too much of a target.

Apparently in the final mission, if you fail to take Seattle back in time, a B83 thermonuclear bomb (capable of 1.2 Megatons) would be dropped onto the city, top prevent the Chinese from landing, but the in-game cutscene just uses the default tactical nuclear missile illustrate that.

1:32 if i remembere correctly, if you have a unit or ally futher ahead to spot a enemy, the tanks can engage futher that what they can see on their own in some degree, specially when having a forest on the way so i guess it futher echances the need of combine arms and teamwork to make full use of eacj capability's xD

The M256 gun on the Abrams model is mounted on the right side of the gunshield, not the left like it is in real life. Also, its coax is just a hole in the gunshield instead of being a tube sticking out from it.

3:50 well yes but to have it not firing it isn't that unrealistic as far as I know, because to fire the ATGM was quiet expensive so the crews should only use it when really necessary wich would be quiet rarely, because there are only a hand full of situations, where the missile hast an advantage. The fighting distances often would be more in range of the gun due to the terrain, buildings or forests. And the recon Bo-105 shouldn't carry weapons at all. The Version you mentioned would be the PAH 1 (Panzerabwehhubschrauber 1) with the HOT 1 or PAH 1A1 with the HOT 2. The recon variant was the VBH (Verbindungshubschrauber) wich didn't carry any weaponary But evewn due to all this detail-mistakes in the game, it is quiet astonishing, how detailed it is. I mean, this game is more than 15 years old but the graphics looks like from somewhen in the 2010s

3:29 shouldn’t the M551 Sheridan also have amphibious capabilities? It can deploy a canvas screen, and then cross bodies of water.

4:51 They are 6B5 Ulej and paratroopers have been seen using 6B3 but in a larger conflict they could be seen with 6B5, only the berets could be brought by the platoon commanders

2:45 Ka-25

What recon helo would the soviets have

4:29 If we talk about the airborne forces they would have to use the TTSKO suit and for the deserts they would have to use afghanka suits

pt 76 can swim. that game is a joke.

Hello, I really liked your video, one of the things I would like you to talk about is that the C-141 and IL-76 fly very low and that the Soviet air carriers carry AK-47s when they should carry the AKS-74N and RPG. 18