World of Warships- Top 5 Most Hated Ships

Подписаться 57 тыс.

Просмотров 60 тыс.

50% 1

Hey guys, today we take a look at five ships that have earned the ire of the playerbase! Let me know what ships should have been included on this list below!
Apply for TSIOF here!: docs.google.com/forms/d/1U1jf...\
Patreon Link: / sealord
Discord: / discord
Music:
Ross Rowley:
/ ross-rowley
www.rossrowley.com
Music by Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio
Outro Music: Stranger Think- C418
Have a replay? Send it here!: SealordMountbatten@gmail.com
Follow me on Twitch!: / sea_lord_mountbatten
Music: Stranger Think- C418
Ross Rowley: / ross-rowley
/ radon
Music: Stranger Think- C418
Ross Rowley: / ross-rowley
/ radon i=1553897018&app=itunes
UltraNova: / @ultranova
Turbo: / @turboa
Chapters:
0:00 List Intro
0:43 5.Conde
4:46 4.FDR
8:38 3.Smolensk
12:04 2.Nahkimov
17:16 1.Any Submarine

Игры

Опубликовано:

11 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 326

@adrianbyrdziak5130 Год назад

Another thing on Nahkimov - it's invulnerable to fighters. Let me explain - fighters have been programmed to attack only planes that still have ordinance and not waste ammunition on planes that do not pose a threat. This works fine for most aircraft carriers. But russians ... do you see the problem? The Russians may ignore the fighters, because even if the fighters start attacking, the Soviet carrier will drop its payload and the fighter planes will say, "These planes are not a threat. Looking for another target". This is stupid because a Soviet aircraft carrier can drop a target, even with fighter cover, without losing any aircraft. Your aircraft carrier IS NOT ABLE TO PROTECT YOU. Welcome to world of warships

@aristosachaion_ Год назад

This also means CVs can't even defend themselves against a Nakhimov. And yet still there are "people" who cut this company slack.

@silwarhd3851 Год назад

@@aristosachaion_ I got some really good games ruined because my fighters would do shit against a Chkalov. So stupid.

@GrasshopperKelly Год назад

Nakhimov and to a similar extent Chkalov and Pobeda get colossal immunity periods to AA damage. I've happily deplaned multiple FDR's. It's almost impossible vs Nakhimov, even if the player is disabled and *tries* throwing aircraft away...

@SteelxWolf Год назад

Maybe its almost like the old system was better?

@GrasshopperKelly Год назад

@@SteelxWolf not judging by what people complain about still. Which is being spotted, terrible CV players on their own teams, and damage. They did about as much damage with the unicum players, they did a hell of a lot *More* spotting, including torpedoes, and few CV players were even "okay" above tier 5.

@KPen3750 Год назад

I can remember my early days of WOWS, years ago, probably 2016 or 17, when the two ships I hated most were the Atlanta and Helena. (Sighs) good times, gooood times

@apertureemployee215 Год назад

Belfast, Kamikaze, Guilio Cesare etc

@davidmichaud4871 Год назад

Atlanta for me. This was 2016.

@DrAhzek Год назад

I think Helena was in 2018, after the split happened. It's not even the date but the fact that Helena was by Wargaming's design a mediocre ship from the start (not bad, but not great). You most likely mean the old Cleveland that was an insane firestarter in the old days and most likely the reasons why the split happened the way we see it today (with Cleve being pushed to T8, where it is a decent ship at best...and doing PepsiCola a favor by pushing it down to T6 where it can actually shine).

@laudennis8633 Год назад

Back in the day you need a skill point to know if you're spotted! Good old days. Though my highest techline ship is still Cleve I got form the uptier...

@zedburg Год назад

I hated Belfast with a passion

@leesargent65 Год назад

My biggest gripe about subs is that the damage control usage to clear a ping leaves you so vulnerable, not least because the damage control cool down is much longer than that of the sonar ping. The sub just pings you again or you get set on fire or flooded by something else. Puts far too much pressure on one consumable. I have seen a vid of someone from WG saying "we know people hate subs, but what can we do?" So what do they do, fully release them anyway. They do not fix the many existing problems or bugs whilst introducing even more problems and create even more imbalance. That's before things like the matchmaker not even attempting to create even matches so you get constant roll overs. The latest waterline also talks about implementing cross server matches for new player games (likely to be expanded in the future for higher tiers), which is clearly due to a lack of new players. They are so greedy they just don't get that they are most of the problem and I doubt they ever will. Upgrading my PC soon as I cannot see me playing this game into 2023.

@oldRighty1 Год назад

Yeah, at least if the DC to clear a ping would last a minute, long enough for them to look for someone else...

@itscrabby9010 Год назад

the only real change they could do is give the ping the same cooldown as the torps

@Andy.Gledhill.Models. Год назад

Exactly my beef with subs. Using Damage Con to mitigate a sonar ping is the dumbest thing that Wargaming have ever put into the game. Why is it so hard for them to just add another consumable to counter a sonar lock. I need a damage con to actually heal bloody damage. Not to waste it on countering a stupid sub.

@jimr5703 Год назад

You are experiencing hallucinations. WG said there would NEVER be submarines in WoWs.

@leesargent65 Год назад

@@jimr5703 Yes so true. They also said that Superships would only be available for those who had ground the lines and had three tier 10 ships. 3 months later they are announcing that they are flogging Superships to any whale that can afford it. Nothing surprises me anymore.

@Apollyon-er4ut Год назад

I hear you regarding the Conde from CB, but if it were nerfed (burst mode removed) you'd feel the same way about the annapolis. It actually has 3 salvos instead of two like the Conde. The truth is, all the T11 shouldn't be allowed in T10 CB, AND they need to call them what they are: T11.

@richardcobb1555 Год назад

Submarines have totally changed my opinion of how much fun it is to play WoWS. Now I mostly just play Co-op to avoid them for the most part. Random is NOT fun anymore.

@szymonkania3068 Год назад

Im a new player to WoWs, around 400 battles, i stick mostly to tier VI crusiers and when i see that the ship have to drop the depth charges manualy on top of the sub instead of having a plane i basically assume i have no protection against subs. Trying to chase them is pointless cause they are fast like motorboats and if i leave my cover to depth charge them im being nuked by enemy team and even if i sacrafice and hit them with all my depth charges (I was palying huanghe AA and anti sub build, 4 drops, 3 bombs in payload, once i scored 9 hits and the sub was still floating) its not guaranteed u will sink it. Having hydro is also pointless to fight them because 2km spot range is ridicoulous. Like... I can spot little torps from 3km away but cant spot thick fat underwater metal trashcan from the same distance?

@OwenIsDaBoss Год назад

I still remember when the FDR was in testing. Being in my Venezia, seeing a squad of rocket planes get to me, shoot me way before my AA even activates, then HALVES MY HEALTH. God that thing is nuts

@svenfricke2961 Год назад

If you think Eagle is broken - i today had the "pleasure" of playing against a Sekuriyu.

@arongyorffy3070 Год назад

It is maybe just me, but nowadays I don't think that Smolensk is that "bad". They are fairy rare, and most of the time they are not anymore annyoing than a Kitakaze or F.Sherman.

@00spinz35 Год назад

I kinda agree, it's just a better HE spammer, it's like smolensk is a bullet wound and the other HE spammers are a stab wound, they both suck but one may be worse than the other

@anidiot2818 Год назад

Same for me. Smolensk is annoying to play against, but it doesn't have that much battle Impact. I hate fighting Smalands way more. It has the tools to deal with any class, is an annoying HE spammer and doesn't even have a citadel in the first place.

@arongyorffy3070 Год назад

@@anidiot2818 My personal demon in this game is the Kitakaze, insane DPM, very powerful torpedos, no citadell and japanese HE

@Virgilfinnatell Год назад

Agreed. I would probably have replaced her with USS SUS

@belsteed6050 Год назад

@@anidiot2818 totally Smaland is a real threat; it counters almost everything. It can shred aircraft too, it has almost everything and has one of the best AA. That's like almost unfair. You need a long range DD with high velocity to trade with her but that's about it.

@jimmyasbell261 Год назад

In my opinion, a huge problem with subs, while trying to avoid being hit by torpedoes, you are forced to maneuver your ship in a direction that will get you blapped by any other surface ship in range. CV's have no counter play to Subs. So, like the typical person who is willing to play this class of ship (while it is broken), will go straight for the CV knowing this... People complain about CV's in general, however AA is more effective than given credit for with the newer AA DDs. A Holland and a few other high tier tech line DDs will shred a squadron very quickly by themselves. Having said all that, FDR is broken for sure and it does deserve it's place on your list. One major complaint with WG is, they appear not to care about these problems. They won't listen to player feedback and make changes accordingly. They have received my last dollar last year and After my premium time expires, I will probably just stop playing this game as much sometime in 2023. Been playing almost 7 years. Starting to feel like I am in an abusive relationship... I love the game, I hate the company. Time to move on suppose.

@bigwitt187 Год назад

When did they ever care about player feedback?

@Panzer_Runner Год назад

@@bigwitt187 they never did and never will

@Evangeline.F Год назад

Ah yes, Smolensk... Never forget, Smolensk was considered toxic low-skill gameplay and overpopulated the matches, so she got three different mechanic changes to screw it over and a nerf to her armour scheme to make her midsection overmatchable by the heavier cruisers. And then people discovered that Thunderer, released at the same time, was just as much a lazy toxic ship that overpopulated the queue, so it got a nerf of its range to "only" 21 km. That's it.

@Talshere88 Год назад

By putting it at 21km you bring it into range of basically all equivalent teir BBs is the thing. And it's not the best armoured among its peers. It removed its ability to just sit on the map border and has to join the rest of the BBs in open water behind the cover.

@Evangeline.F Год назад

@@Talshere88 It's a BB. It has enough armour to bounce most BBs when angled. The only BBs that overmatch it and had issues matching 24 km range (without using spotter plane) are Hannover and Incomparable. Indeed, the only T10 BBs that now could reach it and couldn't before are the Germans, as Conq matched the range, Montana, Repu and Yamato exceed the range. Colombo still falls short. And for any BB that cannot overmatch, shooting a BB with cruiser levels of rudder shift at 21 km is still often just a wasted shot, as the amount of damage is limited and the Thunderer will just bounce most shots by angling. Basically throws all impact out the window trying to hit a dodgy BB with BB grade armour, at least T9 BB grade hp pool and an improved repair party that can go dark if it really needs to. Fact is, range was the least issue with the ship. In good hands Smolensk nerfs actually matter, Thunderer "nerfs" don't, because a good Thunderer player knows that their ship is sturdy and stealthy enough to be able to play at something like 15 km and nail most T10 cruisers with overmatch...

@TheChonaman Год назад

For mid-tier players, Kamikaze, and Giulio Cesare, would be good adds to this list. A lot of Giulio and Kamikaze players have an insane number of games in these ships and use them as exploit or farming vessels. Check the stats on them. Giulio::1.3MM battles, 57% WR. Kamkaze: 2 MM + battles, 57% WR.

@jayde1708 Год назад

Giulio win rate on Asia server 61% !

@FuzioN_GD Год назад

Jean Bart. This is by far my most hated ship in the game. There's NOTHING you can do if the damn thing decides to sit bow in while shooting ALL guns (which are deadly and have a reload booster because french bias doesn't exist, right?) and being immune to any shell under 457mm

@meneldal Год назад

Your main turret breaks quite easily, especially if you're bow in. So even without overmatch you can weaken them significantly. They burn pretty well too, not like German BBs but still.

@pitdoctor Год назад

The limited time I play WOWS anymore, the only ships that I hate are CVs and Subs. Pretty much anything else can be dealt with.

@mindclaw915 Год назад

I personally love subs, and I fall in between the two groups pointed out by Mountbatten. So, if you find me in game, I can survive, but most times I don't do too much damage.

@thefancyapple1823 Год назад

I like the fact that the Kearsarge, you know the half aircraft carrier and half battleship doesn't get anything to deal with subs. Like yeah they get their tiny tims but no asw planes or anything like Really?

@Straswa Год назад

Poor Celebes cries in the corner with no ASW nor airstrikes. It even has depth charge racks modeled on its stern.

@drgenki6491 Год назад

@@Straswa All dutch tech-tree line cruisers do not have ANY defences against submarines, even their airstrike cannot hit them. Only chance to sink them is immediately fire at them when they are at surface.

@Straswa Год назад

@@drgenki6491 Right.

@Tundraviper41 Год назад

the fact the Russian carriers unlike regular carriers is that they can return to the ship controls when the planes attack an enemy. so they can deploy another attack when your strike aircraft and skip bombers drop their bombs. having played them up to tier 8, i can say the are really broken. i seen a thunderer on my team a while back when they first came out, thunder and the enemy nahkimov where the only two ships left in the match. down to the wire. both ships were separated by an island in the center of the map. the thunderer was at full health and the cv was at 80%. in less then 1 minute and 43 seconds the nahkimov completely destroyed the thunderer from full health to dead. it blew not only our minds but the enemy teams as well. russian CVs with the rocket assisted takeoff makes all Russian cvs more dangerous at close range which is a powerful advantage unique to them and their statistics.

@lackystricker1984 Год назад

What I don't understand is why the quintessential submarine hunting CVs don't have any way of hunting them, no depth charges or sonar buoys... historically planes were the nightmare of u-boats.

@Hydra360ci Год назад

That one is easy... they don't want their special class hunting their new special class. It's basically why CV's can't take each other out in the first 3 minutes of the game.

@Shooterlot Год назад

As far as CVs or subs being worse, I think it depends on the situation and what class you play. I play a lot of DDs and CVs make them super unfun to play. I will add that sub's at least have to take a risk to do damage, there is a chance to find it and kill it. CVs get to hide the whole match and do damage with impunity.

@Andy.Gledhill.Models. Год назад

The trouble is, when you go chasing after that sub in your DD or Cruiser. To drop depth charges on him. It usually ends up taking you out of position and into the fire of other enemy guns.

@jeremygrimes9006 Год назад

Less experienced player here, so forgive me if I seem uninformed on higher tier actions, but can't you just see where the bombers spawn from and track the CV that way?

@snailboi6902 8 месяцев назад

@@jeremygrimes9006yes, but getting within spotting range is difficult to do and only half of the battle. the entire time you are chasing the cv down, he will be dropping strikes on you, which you either must dodge (lmao) or tank. on top of that you need to shoot and kill the cv, which is super annoying to do. automatic dcp with a 60s duration, armored decks and trolly citadels mean cvs can be tankier than battleships. and this is assuming a 1v1. most of the time you would have to get through the ships in your way to think about shooting at the cv. there is zero counterplay - you can't dodge, because planes are more maneuverable. you can't avoid him, because he decides who he is striking. you can't stop his strikes, because aa fire doesn't do enough damage to shoot down his planes. you can't deplane him, because he has magical plane building factories. you can't charge him down either because his team is in the way and cvs hit 30 knots, meaning they are on equal speed with all bbs and ca/cls at higher tiers, apart from a 1-2 knot difference. dds can catch up very well except the stealthiness of dds is completely removed by plane spotting and dodging isn't an option even with the increased maneuverability of dds. add on top of this that strikes do lots of damage and break your aa (permanently, mind you) while the planes can be 3d printed makes it a very unfair and incredibly unfun class to fight.

@saxonian6634 Год назад

Conde, they simply need to make a localised lockout on the reload booster when the F mode is used, so they are seperate choices that can't be used in combination. I'd put USA and Eagle top, simply for their ability to spot the entire map within seconds of the game starting. As a DD main, I'm more annoyed at being perma-spotted by CVs than I am by having to dodge CV attacks (as much as I despise that too). I'd also add ships no longer in game. I'm lucky to have many of them, including the main culprits (Smolensk, Smaland, Thunderer) but what are new players meant to do when they face these ships and the game says 'tough, you will never have them'? I'm fine with things being very time consuming to get, but I think it's a real kick in the face to attracting new players when some of the most OP ships they face will literally never be available to them.

@jammo7370 Год назад

Super CVs cant spot the entire map that fast, they have the regular T10 planes for a couple minutes before the jets come online, the spotting isn’t that much better than T10 carriers, it’s the ridiculous damage and a complete inability to react to the jets that’s the problem. Sussy torps do obscene damage per drop and this is AFTER wg nerfed it several times.

@NachoManRandySandwich Год назад

I have all of them except the Eagle 😂 for now 🤣

@ArterialCanine Год назад

The biggest issue with Subs is that they do not promote TEAM play. they are a single player solo game style and their spotting, you have no defence (in a DD for example) constantly spotted by what and from where (if it don't ping and stays at periscope) so you can't attack, if you do your dead. getting spotted by a sub in any other class and your like where is it and by scanning for it your losing your situational awareness. It is a hard enough skill to get the team to maintain especially those without an operational background let alone if they totally lose it due to the sub.

@aayansaluja2305 Год назад

hi man ive been watching u since 2018 and i rlly luv ur channel and also keep up the content!!! i love these top 5 or other top 5/top 10 lists!!!!!!!!! keep it up!!!!!!!!!!!

@KaguyasBeat Год назад

I'm surprised Thunderer wasn't on here. Feel like you were the number one person advocating how broken that ship was during a time everyone was like "It's just really good not OP". I still hate dealing with that thing. The range nerfs to it helped with the problem sure but just like with Smolensk: It's one of the most annoying surface ships to deal with to this day.

@matthewvenci2430 Год назад

Who says it’s not OP???

@Pincer88 Год назад

Wholeheartedly agree. Though not being very good at subs myself, if I manage to find an isolated BB (or indeed a Dutch cruiser), timing your dive, simply pinging them a single time to make them burn their damage repair and the party is on. Playing the Dutcha lot - it's the line I started with - subs are excrutiatingly frustrating. Dutch CCs need to get close and tug in behind island cover to make their guns and the airstrike useful. That already meant getting into DD range and staying on your toes against torpedo runs, but subs ruin that play considerably. So best is to team up with a CC or DD with you managing the triple A and the other guy/gal taking care of subs. Maybe that's the thing we all need to do by the way: teaming up and really coordinating a division. Pinging just isn't going to cut it anymore.

@ShaneMcGrath. Год назад

I'd agree with that list, Subs homing torps are still BS despite the nerf. I remember it used to be Wooster that was farming/spamming everyone before Smolensk. Also it depends what ship I'm playing as to what is annoying, I would say 80% of the time I play Jean Bart they match me against my nemesis Musashi and it's not really a fair fight as most times it's bow on brawls. I'll lose against those big guns and my shells do no damage and force me to switch to HE as they just outheal it while their AP destroys me, Have to really play strategically and try and flank to get those juicy citadels. Thunderer can also be a pain in the butt for a lot of ships out there to play against.

@Hydra360ci Год назад

Don't forget... both the Musashi and Jean Bart are pretty much helpless against a sub. Since they can only call planes 5km away from themselves. Musashi more so than Jean Bart, since at least the Jean Bart is maneuverable and fast.

@keithrobertson9075 Год назад

yeah, what's with that? How can we evade/avoid GUIDED torps?

@BlackHearthguard Год назад

@@keithrobertson9075 They stop homing in their terminal phase, you can turn out or use your throttle to avoid them in the right ships.

@stalkingtiger777 Год назад

Your forgetting that subs make you burn your damacon over and over again. That one aspect alone has cost me many a ship.

@gustavocabrerea1341 Год назад

It seeths with irony that you put subs at #1, which I'd say AT LEAST 85% of the community can agree with, and WeeGee is STILL deciding to push them into early access soon...

@paulrasmussen8953 Год назад

Wg is not that smart.

@gustavocabrerea1341 Год назад

@@paulrasmussen8953 Trust me, they're more than aware of their decisions, they just decide to go along with them anyways.

@paulrasmussen8953 Год назад

@@gustavocabrerea1341 hence why they are not smart

@Mooncricketstinks Год назад

@@paulrasmussen8953 being smart is subjective to interpretation in this regard. The original PR dockyard wasn't smart at all and they fixed it. The fact they had scandals prompting eu law to force list percent change in lootboxes, kong/godzilla scam, Santa crate shortlist scanda, etc. Promising not to introduce subs or guns bigger than yammy, both broken, i could go on. Weegee is smart but also criminal driven profiteering. The "not smart" is the playerbase who continues to funnel them huge amounts of money for digital items, and support their unscrupulous behavior.

@paulrasmussen8953 Год назад

@@Mooncricketstinks the proposed dockyard was good what they dod on release was not

@7thsealord888 Год назад

Completely with you as regards hating Subs. Historical accuracy has never been a priority in WOW, I realize that. But WOW subs are so wildly crazily different from reality (AND the rest of the game itself) that we might as well just say they have wizards on board.

@Saddy231 Год назад

7:45 I can confirm, my AA build worcester decimates FDR planes

@Omniknightish Год назад

Am I the only one who remembers when WG said they were never going to add subs to the game? They are way to much of a pain to deal with and against someone who knows what they are doing you can have three or four fairly nicely homing torpedoes coming at you.

@raymondliew2725 Год назад

Jean Bart and all those Heavy French Cruiser should be on the list, coz of all those "Bow In and bounce everything"

@danpower-JP Год назад

For me, it's the Asashio. It has deep water torpedoes which are only detectable right on impact and cause flooding every time they hit along with causing as much damage as a citadel. The torpedoes ignores torpedo protection and hydro doesn't doesn't do much good against them either. To top that all off, the torpedoes have a ludicrous 20km range and the only downside is their fairly long reload time of 112 seconds which still isn't the slowest torpedo reload time and also only having 8 per side. The concealment is also quite low like with most DDs and has a smoke generator along with a torpedo reload booster

@ArterialCanine Год назад

Hate is such a strong word. I h8 Subs, I h8 CV's, I h8 the Strasbourg. There are many too h8 certainly more than 5 lol so tough choices. Good job your getting in now before the h8 train starts for the Hampshire. :P

@davemartin8409 Год назад

I think a rework for subs, something like a mode like Metal Gear Solid could make subs an interesting class. I think the current game doesn't translate the role of subs well as they are modeled on the U.S.N. subs; surface craft that can submerge for short periods of time. German u-boats were designed differently with features that defined the role of u-boats.

@treyschmitz6784 Год назад

My clan member was in that game with you in the FDR xD

@Khaos82_ Год назад

I honestly don't think WG will ever figure out how to balance Subs.

@BlackHearthguard Год назад

I honestly don't think balancing SSs or CVs is even possible.

@danpower-JP Год назад

Trying to grind tier 7, the Musashi has really got on my nerves. The presence of a CV means that it would be either kept in check or given spotting so that it can aim better. The worst part about it is that is can see tier 7 ships who stand little chance against it due to it's armor, health, guns and range that it fires at. I had to pray that the Musashi didn't obliterate me in a single salvo when facing it. It's not as bad if you are facing it at tier 8 or 9 or as a DD but it is still an absolute pain for tier 7 players. And to top that, it's range means that it can CV snipe given that it has sight on the enemy CV. The Musashi is also hard to get to thanks to being far behind enemy lines which means you have to either get through them or their AA and by then the Musashi would have either disappeared or have killed you

@mikeconnor7394 Год назад

I wanted the FDR since it was released - I really hated playing against it - and yes it’s so slow - but it kills something every 25 seconds!

@kaollachan Год назад

for the sub part, don t forget that urss ship bb hve limited repair party, that it is a pain to have your turret turn around in bb and some cruiser when trying to aim that asw, and that they are so annoying that even weegee want to put automated asw on CV XD

@TheL0vecake Год назад

Got to love when a Nahkimov planes start their attack run and my AA stops firing, then when the planes are leaving my AA starts up again for 2 seconds before the planes are gone.................

@SteveRosner Год назад

Don't think I've laughed this hard before while watching your sub crash into the #3 ship of this video.

@AlphaEra Год назад

Don't forget "The Silent Service", one of the best manga about war and submarine :D

@lackystricker1984 Год назад

Zao in the old time... Shoot and not spoted..... Insane

@darkroom0716 Год назад

At.least when Submarine players make a mistake they can be punished via being targeted and destroyed, even if you have to stop what you are doing to kill them. A CV player is only punished if they make repeated repeated bad attacks on heavily heavily AAd targets. Even then, do they lose health? Do they die? Nope. They just take a break and get more planes.

@leethax100 Год назад

Almost every sub player I run across is an account winrate in the forties, and a sub winrate of fifty five plus. And woe betide you if you run into a real unicum in a sub, or even worse, the player who'se still pulling a forty percent in a sub.

@GrasshopperKelly Год назад

Nakhimov was night and day vs playing Pobeda. Aircraft suddenly gained some actual speed (Serov feels faster than its torpedo bombers), and the immunity periods vs AA is stupid...

@tonyennis1787 Год назад

20:00 when you're dueling a good sub player, it takes your total focus. And then the other reds shoot you to pieces. I have sunk many subs only to be deleted by a BB I didn't notice because I was distracted. And it is SO BAD when you're uptiered against a sub.

@alexroselle 10 месяцев назад

you're absolutely right about #1... any non-braindead submarine player is this game's equivalent of the poison headcrabs in Half-Life 2, in that if you detect them nearby you have to immediately stop anything else you're doing to kill them with extreme prejudice and/or go evasive, often by over-exposing yourself to fire from other enemies.

@gregoryfolsom7882 Год назад

Conde wouldn't be nearly the cancer it is if it didn't have penetration AND accuracy boosted during burst fire. Annapolis is a good continuation of the Des Moines line, and the burst fire takes forEVER to reload comparatively.

@gaiuscaesar3841 Год назад

Ah the Smolensk. The ship that forced the Commander skill rework, just because WG could not admit they released yet another busted-broken soviet ship.

@hiddentruth1982 Год назад

sonar ping doesn't tell you where the sub is. it just gives you an idea of what direction they are.

@steveoltjenbruns2366 Год назад

You have to find the Sonar flash on the water. When a sub pings it also shows on the water right in front of the sub. That’s where you aim to drop your air strike. But a smart sub commander is moving

@TheShopvac Год назад

They have to do something about the homing torpedoes. They are so broken. Perhaps they should be like the burst fire mode and the reload is doubled/tripled.

@tpersch3359 Год назад

Another thing about subs is that they shot torpedoes, and torpedo damage is not as healable as others, I think it’s around 10% same as the default healable citadel damage for most ships. So if you play a BB and get hit by sub torps for 30k, you can heal 3k of that, but those torps can cause flooding so you damage con it. And by the time your immunity period is up your being pinged by the sub again, and this repeats until you die.

@BlackHearthguard Год назад

Never damage con a single fire or flood, if you can, try and outheal it.

@mrwittstruck11 Год назад

FDR the big nerf was the torp spread was larger increasing the dispersion. A good CV player with a bad BB player would make this change neglegable

@Falcion-FF Год назад

21:52 subs are annoying mosquitos because you can blew them off of the sea..... Well. For me, cvs are annoying mosquitoes that you can't even destroy and you gotta deal with it till the end of the match, dealing damage to the poor selected ship AT WILL and keeping this poor ship spotted for a very long time Am i the only one asking for a general AA buff?

@ashleyphotog Год назад

never heard of any hate on the Conde, plenty of other ships to hate over this one, like every CV

@silverblack4060 Год назад

Once a sub focuses on you it's a ball ache. Constantly trying to avoid torps and not actually playing in the battle

@realmorecon9687 Год назад

And on the number 1 spot is... Any submarine 🤣 Agreed. As for me, I don't really play subs (except on subsims) since they're paper cup fragile. They're more fragile than the soda cans: destroyers. But I think, maybe, if they make submarines even more fragile than they are now in-game e.g. massively less HP, significantly less torpedo damage but slightly more flooding chance but with significantly less flooding damage it would appeal to many players.

@felixknoll781 Год назад

The sickest sup is the Japanese premium because it's literally a submergeabel dd.

@MrEyescream Год назад

I hope the new Hybrid BBs have something to murder the subs. My Kearsarge has nothing :(

@mikesheldon1957 Год назад

If you are in a BB then the best way to deal with a sub is to charge at it and if you are close his homing torps wont work and eventually he WILL have to surface so then you nuke them

@PengkoleksiTobrut Год назад

well, whenever i play golden lion i always face tier 10 submarine but no cv. i think they need data to fill their spread sheet.

@barbedwirerat661 Год назад

FDR hate is mostly from past reputation as being Nakhimov-level OP. It really was super disruptive for some time after it came out, even when grouped-up it could knock out ships quickly with the repeated strikes from a single squadron. However, from what I have seen lately it looks like it underperforms compared to the other Tier X CVs. Planes get chewed-up rather easily now from AA. Fighters do very little to protect the team from other player's CVs. Rocket attack planes do very low damage. Bombs get dodged. Torpedo spreads are more bark than bite...except perhaps for low health ships that are not in a position to be able to turn. The biggest FDR complaints I see now in-game are from mad players on the FDR team saying it is not contributing enough...that is the sentiment but more colorful words tend to be used. Just as you have noticed, I also have not seen very many FDRs in-game anymore, which I think is more reflective of the CV now being trash. If it really was better than most CVs, it would still get played frequently. Oh how the mighty have fallen...

@sardaukerlegion Год назад

I can only agree 100 % on this list

@zedburg Год назад

I'm surprised "Any Aircraft Carrier" wasn't on the list.

@missk1697 Год назад

Indomitable? Bearn?

@EvoraGT430 Год назад

@@missk1697 Yep, them too.

@NeptuniaMorgan Год назад

@@EvoraGT430 Bearn actually being fun if you park your fighters in front of the enemy CV. Like that’s the only way I think a CV can be actually fun.

@FltCaptAlan Год назад

look with 118 karma in game, I can spread the "love" to all the subs AND the CVs in game a few times, if I want to (and decide to go into randoms in the first place, especially now that more ships can go into ops

@GreggFellows Год назад

when you have a double cv and double sub game you'll just hate the game........ slowly bit by bit the fun is going

@veritas4887 Год назад

Let me correct you on one bit. It's not just the enemy team that hates the submarine. EVERYONE hates the submarine.

@ruif1971 Год назад

You forgot FDR can't link attacks, after every squadron attack it has a 20 second cool off b4 next set in the squadron can start an attack.

@urbanworm7881 Год назад

U nailed it

@danieldeak9141 Год назад

Imagine the satsuma with the supercruisers burst fire. Sheesh

@jaysonnunley6602 Год назад

I bought the directors cut of das boot good movie

@themistikcrow Год назад

18:24 I feel called out

@naeemahangarzadeh9959 10 месяцев назад

I now need a torpedo plushie... I haven't laughed that hard in a long time. I dunno how yall get these amazing sub games... I get radar'd from behind a mountain from a ship i didn't know was there and then my Gato experiences some strong pornography of depth charges

@pete5177 Год назад

Most hated: subs, super ships, hybrids, CVs. In that order for me.

@veritas4887 Год назад

Back in the days when Smolensk had 19.2km...that single-handedly sealed the decision of Stalingrad for many players. Ofc you can't hit anything substantial at 19.2, but it was SO annoying. Then it was nerfed to 16.0 max and given 16mm which made it near unusable unless you're in a division or in ranked because everybody knows to get rid of you first. But when you're in a smoke division, just saying.

@drewbyronmeadows2208 Год назад

I quit playing for almost 2 years out of frustration with the Smolensk

@sethalos Год назад

1) all subs 2) all cv's 3) 1 and 2 4) All of the above.

@xLuna18 Год назад

5) all superships

@keithrobertson9075 Год назад

This

@kicktaylor Год назад

I don’t know how this isn’t just a list of air craft carriers

@UrielUK Год назад

Thunderer ? Kleber, Worcester and super OP Smaland :P I like to hunt Conde playing Yolo Emilio :P Ps. I like subs but cv should have some squadron against them, every sub should fear cv.

@skoomd4447 Год назад

Idk why people have such an issue with subs when destroyers are 10x more op. First time encoutering sub, i got sunk. Everytime after is cake once you learn u just drive towards the ping or away. Destroyers on the other hand can one shot bb, now thats op af

@davidmichaud4871 Год назад

There is not alot in between you say. Well I say that about the cv and sub players space between there ears.

@ABCWCTR Год назад

my comment on sub: at least cv sniping dds can spot a thing or two

@MechFrankaTLieu Год назад

Smolensk really not a problem even back then , I've play the ship and play against the ship , its more the community's big gun mentality doing themselves a dis-service , so using AP would over-pen, then switch to HE , just like the pan Asian CLAA they had pretty much paper thin armor and not much HP, todays play style of not tanking and not taking any is what's hurting the big guns - do not forward, do not group with the forward vanguard to work with them, just back lane camping and shooting from distance then well some countering from distance I shall say warranted , in fact like to see more of them from both torpedoes and mad guns

@JP-su8bp Год назад

Interesting how submarines not being overpowered @18:00 transitions to skilled players being able to dominate a battle @18:42. That many submarine players are lame makes the situation even worse.

@EvoraGT430 Год назад

They're usually so lame they cannot even play CVs.

@Hydra360ci Год назад

If u go to like T5, there is always someone in those low tiers asking how do they get subs... And of course, the game unlocks T10 subs to these guys, eventually.

@kenrodmelrocity4241 Год назад

LOL so glad you put "any sub" in first place, that was my first thought when I opened and started watching your video. Terrible addition to the game.

@robertshaver4432 Год назад

Submarines: The best counterplay ship for them is Lightning! BTW submarines can be hydro detected at full depth: My Lightning hydro detects them at 2k: Sorry Jingles, Myth Busted!

@steveoltjenbruns2366 Год назад

Can confirm. I think there’s a couple other ships too but definitely have been spotted at max depth by hydro.

@robertshaver4432 Год назад

@@steveoltjenbruns2366 thank you for the confirm. Yes there are other good sub hunters too but I think Lighning is the best one. Sharp turn radius + hard hitting depth charges and of course a 3 min hydro. Thanks Again!

@Virgilfinnatell Год назад

Kinda surprised USS SUS isn't on this list. I feel like she would have been a much more hated ship nowadays than Smolensk tbh. Smolensk is kinda just annoying only, while USS SUS basically ruins any kind of fun. Just bc conde is on this list doesn't mean other superships can't be.

@povilassiurblys447 Год назад

After submarines i play only co-op,and looking for some new game to start.

@JimBlock999 Год назад

I did not spoil myself by hovering above the number 1 on the time line, and had a good laugh when the most annoying ship got announced. 😄

@Brom2855 Год назад

Subs can be considered OP in that they can spread out rather than shotgun their torps. Why a problem? A ship that dodged first one hasn't time to react to the next ones.

@Rolkatsuki Год назад

my top 5 most hated ships is: 5th: any HE spammer. 4th: any ship with radar. 3rd: any CV. 2nd: any supership. 1st: any Submarine. honorable mentions: any ship that's russian bias. (sarcasm intended)

@BiscuitWaite Год назад

I thought they incorporated visualized pings..... I have yet to see it

@marlenestockton2269 Год назад

We have 425 ship in port....420 of them are hated. Nerf'ed and balanced to death. Thank you.

@pauloakwood9208 Год назад

Subs would be better if their speed was actually closer to the submerged speeds in that era. No WWII sub moved at 30+ knots under water. Also, homing torps? Where did that come from?

@Dan7909dan Год назад

for me the main Vermont with AA built FDR is not that much just another fly. but when nakhimov even Vermont AA useless

@happyboysuper7723 Год назад

Hey guys, I cant find my festival gifts in wows. I have played couple of times with my tier X conqueror but there are no supercontainers. Any help?

@Hydra360ci Год назад

It's not active yet.... not sure when it goes active but I think it's sometime this week. Probably Wednesday.

@cirno9356 Год назад

soon added to the list . hampshire xD

@warchild1673 Год назад

Subs wouldn't bother me so much if they didn't have homing torps. There torps should shoot like a dd. Shoot at guessed direction of enemy. Ping should only give ship and it's direction.

@mikep9690 Год назад

My biggest problem with subs is they move way to fast dived. They should be 1/4 speed at max depth half at periscope

@ColCurtis Год назад

I agree, but in real life the deeper you are the faster you can travel and remain quiet due to less cavitation at greater depths. Maybe they should add a cavitation mechanic that changes your detect range based on speed and depth

@Hydra360ci Год назад

u know... that's completely backwards to actual subs. Periscopes should be easier to spot at higher speeds, plus sound is a lot more detectable at shallow depths.

@mikep9690 Год назад

@@ColCurtis that's only true for teardrop shaped subs (nuclear) so that could be the big draw sor the supper subs t11

@ColCurtis Год назад

@@mikep9690 no I don't think it's only true for teardrop shaped subs, it has to do with the speed the propellers can spin. At depth the high pressure prevents water from boiling on the low pressure side of the propeller allowing you to spin the prop faster.