WORLDS BEST UFO Photo? CALVINE PHOTO Investigation 

Someone needs to get help (from their local university?) to carry out underground sonar testing to see whats going on underneath. _GOUND PENETRATING RADAR._ A lot of underground drilling occurs under Walmart buildings btw - noisy and rowdy for locals. Note: In the UK - not US - if you own freehold land you own it all the way down to the earth's core and up to the stratosphere. This law may have been altered during the last agenda 21 fiasco update so need to confirm. They may be drilling sideways under your land.

Thank you for watching, Kevin. This is a very intriguing story that I was unaware of. I am going to do some research on this. I appreaciate you sharing.

@@seanturi hey " SEAN , I just wanted to thank you for sharing your CONTENT with us ! I myself just turned 65 in dec 2022; and have always been intrigued "UFOS . well anyway as a kid I loved airplanes and still do , I remember when I was in my 20s , I remember about 3 in the morning I went outside to my backyard to get some fresh air , I looked towards the south west and seen this bright light Streek across the sky traveling faster than anything I've ever seen with no sound !!! of course I told myself that's strange than about 30 seconds later or less (lol 2 MILITARY JETS were hot on it's Azz , that told me what I thought I was seeing was STRANGE.....

Thank you so much for your kind words! I am thrilled to hear that you enjoy my content on mysterious topics. Your support means a lot and I am grateful for your encouragement to continue growing the channel. I'll keep working hard to bring you more engaging and thought-provoking content. Thank you again for being a part of the channel!

Hi Ashton! That is a great compliment, thank you! I am just one month into this channel so brace for impact. I will be producing a lot more on a regular basis. Stay tuned!

Subbed

@@ophiolatreia93 with your help we hit over 1000 subs this month. Thank you!

Thanks for watching, Paul. I appreciate your input. We are looking to bring on additional researchers for even more information in future videos. Stay tuned!

Thank you for watching! Based on my research it seems to be an area that has a lot of flight activity. I am thinking this is the case of this shot.

Thanks, Mike! Stay tuned. We have some very interesting video topics in the queue...

Thanks for watching, Michael! This is fascinating. The Amaury Rivera testimony has been mentioned in other comments. I have it on my video board. Perhaps I will do this one in the near future. Thank you!

@@seanturi top man 👍

Thanks for watching, Adrian. I appreciate the feedback 👍

Thank you, Francisco! Your recognition means a lot to me. Producing these videos is quite time-consuming, but I am committed to putting in the effort to make them as accurate and high-quality as possible. I am currently putting together a team to help me increase the frequency of my content. Stay tuned for more exciting updates!

Thanks so much!

Thanks, David!

I appreciate you watching and getting your support. Let's see what information comes up in 2023!

More to come!

Thanks, Shane. Much apprecaited!

YES!

That's exactly what I see!

Thanks for watching, Chris! I haven't heard of this one! I appreciate your input and thanks for sharing!

@@seanturi Thanks very much,All the best 😁👍👽

i thought the same thing especially when he removed the island and placed it on the other image

Thank you!

Thanks for watching this video and sharing your input on this video as well. In my last video airport fencing was mentioned which I wanted to address in this video. With that being said, I have read comments posted in this video that say the same as what you have mentioned. Agreed, many layers to each of these photos and topics. Keep the critical feedback coming. I'll do my best to keep things as unbiased and accurate as possible.

Thanks for watching, Larry. Thank you for tuning in! More to come...

Thanks for watching, James. You've got to find that photo! Would be very interesting to see.

@@seanturi Hi Sean, Ive looked and looked and it was in a large album of UFO material with others! I was a NICAP member. I think what may have happened is when I moved the album got lost. Maybe someone who found it may come forward. It was an 8X10 black and white perfectly clear photo. The Detail was unbelievable. It truly is the absolute clearest I’ve ever seen. It was like taking a photo of a car. It was about 500ft away over a field! Jim Mondok

Upload it

A county sheriff department has it's own ufos??

@@jamesmondok8635 can you upload it on your RU-vid?

Thank you, Karim!

Thanks so much, Demetrios! A lot more to come. Stay tuned!

Thank you for watching, William. Your input is greatly appreciated. I completely agree with your comment. It seems that information on black op projects is dispersed in fragments, making it difficult to gain a complete understanding of them. Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this topic.

Thanks so much, Ralph! Stay tuned. We have some exciting topics in the queue...

Thank you for watching! Yes, please share. It might become an inspiration for a future video...

Thanks for watching, Scott. I have added this one to my video board as a possible video topic. I appreciate your feedback.

Thank you for viewing! It is possible!

Hi David, very good content and sighting report. I really enjoyed it. I will paste an interesting sighting report that I found the other day using Wayback Machine and I wonder whether description matches with your bird. Look below, please. Ok, so read this sighting report. "I would like to describe the sighting of what I can only term a very unusual aircraft. Whether or not this sighting pertains to Aurora I cannot say for sure, you will have to judge for yourself. I live in the White Mountains of New Hampshire, sighting various military aircraft in the area is nothing new, A-10 "Warthogs" for example can be seen training in the area as often as several times a week. Other aircraft I have seen include the B-52 and various tanker or cargo planes which are difficult to identify by varient (usually around the time of a military deployment). About a month ago a friend and I saw something outside my experience, as far as I know nothing in the "public" US inventory can do what this plane did. It was about 20 minutes before sunset and the sky was clear. We first sighted the plane on the Western horizon at what I estimate was an altitude of 45,000 feet, I base this estimate on other aircraft I have observed in the area and the known height of nearby mountains. What seemed to be the contrail of another aircraft could be seen several miles behind the aircraft and perhaps 10,000 ft. lower and headed north or northwest (a tanker perhaps?) From the moment we saw the aircraft it was gaining altitude and continued to climb the entire time it was in view. By the time it was directly over my position it was perhaps 65,000 ft. up though I admit I had no kind of instrument or calculation to confirm this. It was certainly higher than I had ever seen any military or comercial aircraft fly. In my estimate the plane was between 100 and 130 ft. long and had a delta wing design not too far removed from an SR71 except that the edges of the wings were more rounded and seemed to taper slightly towards the tail. The wingspan was perhaps 60 ft. The color reflected in the full light of the sunset was a muted grey and seemed to reflect very little sunlight, though darkly colored I would not say it was black though it is hard to say in those lighting conditions. The aircraft moved very fast, faster than any other I have seen though I could not give a specific estimate. We did not hear any obvious sonic booms. The aircraft had either two or four engines, placed in the rear and located on either side perhaps 10 - 20 ft. from the center beam of the tail. The tail seemed to taper back slightly in the center behind the engine exhaust points. The confusion on the number of engines comes from the appearance of the contrail, two sets of contrails were evident and both seemed to twist or corkscrew somehow, not unlike the way the contrail from two paired engines on a B-52 will look like one somewhat "twisted" contrail, except there you see four of these instead of two and the engines are distinct and obvious on the wings. In retrospect I've concluded that their were two very powerful engines on the plane. The aircraft's rate of climb seemed to increase and at this point we heard the only engine noise since we sighted it, a strange "wail" followed by a low pitched "wooshing" sound. Never heard anything like it. The aircraft then seemed to continue to increase speed as well as altitude, it continued on a course of almost due east until it vanished from sight. I would not hazard even a guess of its altitude when last sighted, but I have never seen anything even come close. Far beyond the range of standard aircraft. I am quite sure about the shape and layout of the aircraft. That shape resembles nothing except the SR71 or the "Valkyrie" which are not flying any longer. I found this page in an attempt to explain what my friend and I had seen, only after ruling out everthing else did I consider the possibility of the Aurora. When my friend (who does not know anything about airplanes) saw several shots of the possible Aurora contrails remarked "thats just like the trail that strange plane we saw left" I began to consider the possibility. Recently my friend and I saw a program with video footage of what might be two Auroura's in flight, we were shocked and were both convinced this was the aircraft we had seen. If you choose to post this account please refer to me only by initials. If you could offer an alternate explanation, please do so, I have never been at such a loss to identify an aircraft, I am certain we saw something outside of the public inventory. Thanks, CH" Is the aforementioned sighting spot on with your sighting when it comes with the aircraft design, appearance?

Thanks for watching and taking the time to share your story here, David. This is very fascinating. Let me digest this is circle back around with questions...

This is very fascinating story as well, Michal. I appreciate your taking the time to post this.

@@RallyRacingVideo THIS sounds very much like the shape we were looking at. SR71 with the fore section removed. " the plane was between 100 and 130 ft. long and had a delta wing design not too far removed from an SR71 except that the edges of the wings were more rounded and seemed to taper slightly towards the tail. " SR-&1's are 57' wide and 107' long so your description would be excellent for for that aircraft. The Blackbirds were flying clear up to 1998 and with NASA after that. The given Max ceiling in 85,000 ft & max speed is given as at Mach 3.3 at 80,000 ft. Although both are reportedly understated. If that bad boy that you saw was 65,000'+ in altitude, I'm not sure that there's enough air at that altitude to create a sonic boom. There's a couple of real good short stories abut the "Habu" here. If you look at the pic or the 3 parked together, they too appear gray, not black. That pic is at the NASA ramp onto Rogers Dry. It exits onto the mud by the "315" on the giant compass rose. I believe that 1 0f these three is the bird currently on display at the NASA museum on north base and the other at the main base museum on Rosamond Blvd. Those 3 are all NASA birds as they're wearing the white NASA band on the tail And if you look at google earth for Edwards at the moment, there appear to be 2 of the Rockwell X-34 space planes sitting on the tie down area west the apron to the lake bed by the 315.

Thank you for watching, John! ha, the power of the algorithm.

@@seanturi Yes. Is it only me? Sometimes l'm thinking of a subject: an old film perhaps or an old 60s pop star and WHAM l get a recommendation from YT! (My friend before he passed away said he doesn't believe in coincidence. I'm beginning to believe him.) I think there is much ADVANCED tech not released to the public, hidden, or simply from fear of being cloned in China and / or used against us.

Thank you for watching! I am hoping more data comes out on this. Perhaps a future video? I appreciate your support.

Professor Simon, it is a pleasure to have you watch the video. Like so many of these types of images there are so many big questions that linger. As you well know, there are so many theories on this picture. One that is coming up in the comments is that it is a row boat. That is a new one for me! Thanks for watching. More to come…

ha, that would put us on a different trajectory with this video.

Thanks for watching! Do you think it is military or something else?

@@seanturi impossible to know looking at a still image. It’s a 2D image of a 3D event. Only think you can really know is that it was a secret.

Thank you for watching, Lawrence. Billy Meir has been mentioned to me several times. I will do a deep dive into his work and see if I can add a critical eye to his photos. If so, I will create a video featuring some of his images.

@@seanturi I will be looking forward to that video, his photos are the eye candy to get you to look, his scientific and other information is where the case absolutely destroys every other UFO case ever and his prophetic warnings if the people would listen to them would save a few million lives same with his predictions.

@@seanturi Billy Meier wrote back in 1947 a letter to all governments warning them about future times, when you read the letter its very clear he is talking about current days events taking place, also in every contact he has with these extraterrestrials he numbers them so when things happen that he has said will happen, people can't say he just added it, especially when people have various books the man has written all over the world.

@@seanturi Sorry I forgot his letter to all governments is contact report 779

Thank you for watching, Marcio! I appreciate your input. You could be right. There are some other photos allegedly which might hold some further evidence on the location.

Thank you for watching, Paolo. I would love to see the shot. You can send it to youtube@seanturi.com

Thanks for watching, Sonya! George Lucas got us again!

You got a subscriber out of me outstanding job

Thank you for watching and subscribing! I appreciate the feedback.

Nick Pope ....... right, nuff said.

@@peterbarratt8699 it is always difficult to separate fact from fiction in these cases. The fact that the MOD refused to release the files for another 50 years though seems to suggest there is something worth looking at.

Thank you for tuning in and for your supportive comments. I fully agree with your observations. The fact that the MOD chose to keep this particular shot for so many decades is indeed a significant red flag. If any new, relevant information comes to light on this topic, I will definitely consider doing a follow-up video. Thank you for your continued interest and support.

Thanks for watching. Agreed!

Thanks for watching, James. It is one of the theories about this photo. I am yet to find any evidence of which airfield it could have been taken at.

Thanks for watching, Charles. This is great input and much appreciated. I will look into the Bonnybridge cases. If I feel I can offer critical feedback Ill do video on it.

Very interesting. I was unaware of this.

@@seanturi Yes you own up to space and down to the core but l don't think its the same law in the US. In fact, they may have since changed it. Agenda 21: a lot of rights and old laws like this have been removed whilst we're all focusing on covld or wars abroad.

Thanks for watching! I will add it to the video link to the description area, "Flying Aircraft"

Thanks for watching, Dadson. I would agree that 99% of the photos and video out there can be explained. Light refraction, interference, etc. is definitely some of the explanations for these types of shots.

Thank you for watching, Jay! I do agree that we need additional evidience outside of photos and video. It seems we are beginning to see creditable witnesses come forward with different types of sightings. I am curious what is to come in the next 5 years.

This is interesting. I haven't heard of this theory.

Really? Where did you read this? Share the article if you have it. I would love to read. Thanks for watching!

Lol, you mean he is leaning forward!

Thank you for watching! I like your input on this. Sounds plausible.

Thank you for watching, Kay! It is one of the theories about this photo. What are your thoughts?

Thank you for tuning in! Professor Simon has a wealth of knowledge on these subjects, and I highly recommend his content. I've personally watched several of his videos and have been impressed by the depth and quality of his work

Thanks for watching, Richard. Interesting point. I appreciate you sharing.

Thanks for watching, Sri. I do have Twitter, however, I will most likely be using RU-vid and Discord for community chat on these video topics. The evidence being released over the past ten years has piqued my interest further. I appreciate your input!

@@seanturi "Piqued", if I may be so bold.

@@peterbarratt8699 Please do! Thank you for catching that 👍

Thank you for watching! There is a theory out there that it is a fishing weight tossed in front of the camera . A rock is just as plausible. I feel like it would have some motion blur if it were. Keep thinking outside the box. I appreciate the iput.

Thank you for watching! It is possible. Many say that it is.

Thanks for watching! Elon is at it again...

haha this is true

Thanks for watching and keeping me on point!

Hey Rudy, thanks for watching. I will add this to my video board!

@@seanturi great!!! I know of the Amaury story because I lived in the US Virgin Islands where I had a sighting along with four other friends one night at a beach,and I know without a shadow of a doubt that what we saw was not made here on this planet.great video ,new sub...

@@rfh2012 Very interesting! I'll do some digging on this topic...

@@seanturi here I found a video on it for you,but maybe you can dig up some more. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YU_jnSlDv2U.html

@@seanturi there's a longer documentary on this where he explains how he was taken and how the poor guy fainted and peed his pants from the fear 🥺

Thanks for watching, Edward. This is a good point that you make.

But why would aliens fly near a city or place where it could be seen?

@@Yellow-Rose I have wondered this myself. You could apply the same quesiton to a black op military aircraft. Good question!

Thank you for watching, Ned. I agree that there seem to be more and more credible sources confirming these unknowns. Let's see what 2023 brings...

@@seanturi Hey Sean yes it seems to be gaining huge momentum on RU-vid especially. I've follow the subject for 30 years. I think we only know 1% of what's going on, but people from agencies now maybe retired are starting to come out. Check out the Ariel school and Westall school cases.... Eye witness testimonies for me are the best. I would reckon maybe 10℅ of cases are reported the rest are not for fear of ridicule, loosing a job, being laughed at etc... Which the American government and other governments set out to do since the 4Os...

Thanks for watching. I would love to see those other photos if they exist. They are supposedly held until year 2076.

@Sean Turi Yes... and dont count on that you get to see them in 2076.. Im sure they wont be able to find any trace of them by then.. and will deny ever having heard about this ufo photograph or event. The funny thing I find.. is if its a staged photograph.. why classify it till 2076.. unless of course.. its something else.

@@DerUfo I think you will be right when that date comes.

Thanks for watching, David. I wish I had definitive answers to why this material was protected. I appreciate your input.

This is a great question. Really makes you wonder if this is true.

I have not - I will do a quick search on it. Thanks for sharing!

@@seanturi ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-uhmaWy62jmo.html I've found it !😉👍 Bonjour de France l'ami ✌😉👍🇫🇷

Thanks for watching and bringing this to my attention. I will be adding a link in my description to their video pertaining to this image.

Thanks for watching, Victor. ha that I have not heard of.

Thank you for viewing, Patrick! How big was the object?

Thank you for your reply I would say judging because it was close to a house in broad daylight 250 I'm roughly around the same size in diameter it was almost perfect sphere had a strange mirage effect like heat coming off a Road something to that effect the time my friend had seen it it must have moved at least half a mile away we were working part-time security and he had binoculars so we used them to view the object very celestial. By the way I love the show lot of your videos are very interesting👍👍👍

Thanks for watching, Justin. Billy Meier has been mentioned a bunch in the comments. I have added his photos to my video queue list. I will do a video on them if I feel I can offer a unique perspective. Stay tuned!

Thank you for watching! The diamond/triangle shape seems to be a theme. Who are the women with the radioactive burns? I will look into it as a possible video topic.

The word diamond also equals 33 in numerology.

Thanks for the thumbs up!

Thanks for watching, Doug. I watched a number of his videos and theories on this image. Which of his do you think is most plausible?

I will look into this. Thank you for letting me know!

Thanks for watching, Will. Great question. I have asked myself that same question.

Thanks for watching, Alan. Are you referring to the thumbnail or photo in the video?

You can see many copies of the image in Professor Simons site. Just search for the Calvine incident.

Thanks for watching, Keith. This is great feedback and is appreciated. I have put it in my back pocket for future videos. Stay tuned!

@@peterbarratt8699 Thanks Peter!

Thanks for watching. It is definitely a theory on this image. Another viewer mentioned it was of another island in that loch. Perhaps in the future we will visit that area and take a look.

Thanks for watching, Marge. It is definitely on my top 5 that I have seen.

Thanks for watching, Tom! Good catch 👍 2076. I added a correction in the description.

I appreciate your input - time travel is a whole other rabbit hole. Perhaps a future video? We really don't know what is behind the curtain with available technology. It is a fascinating subject.

@@seanturi it depends on how you view the time your traveling in. For example a distant star with planets we are viewing are from the time we are viewing. In a way we are looking back at that time period not this one. But if we could instantly travel to what we are viewing by exceeding the speed of light in travel we would be in the observed time

@@nicholaspinkard1189 I see what you are saying. I am going to add the time travel theory to my board. I will want to speak to some physicists before conducting this video. This one is outside of my wheel house but a very interesting topic.

This is a whole other theory to unearth. Maybe a future video?

Thank you for watching, Vern. I haven't heard of this? Would you happen to have a copy?

UFO magazines were a much more popular in the 60s. I don't have any copies. It's possible that some are still published. I would check book stores like Barnes and Noble.

Since the 'photographers' identity has not been released, no-one could possibly know of any other photos released by the 2 'hikers'.

@@vernscheck9089 Thank you!

Thanks for watching. I wish I knew definitively.

True!

Thanks for tuning in! This is another theory I stumbled upon during my research. It would require precise timing to execute. It can't be ruled out. Thank you for sharing!

Thanks for watching, Stu! This is a great question and a crucial piece of information. From what I read, there is a theory that they are being held until 2076 and another theory that they have been released. However, I haven't read any information that indicates their current whereabouts.

Seems I read something sounding as if someone had seen them at one time.

@@stulax1216 That could be possible

Thanks for watching! I will take a look at what you have. Much appreciated.

Thank you for watching! As a photographer who works with photo manipulation, I understand where you're coming from. The reality is anything can be edited realistically. One flag for me is why was the information on this held until 2076? What are your thoughts?

The so-called plane is not even a reflection, since it would have been upside down in that configuration. It is an added feature, as is the fence line, as is the trees, and if you look carefully, the background hill line within the fence line.

Hey Chris, thanks for watching. It is definitely a theory that comes up.

Thank you for watching, John. Your theory is sound. It is quite possible that they used it as a disguise for another endeavor.

@@seanturi can you imagine better hands than american hands today?

The rest of the claimed photos were never revealed, or released.

Thanks for watching, Doug. I watched a number of his videos and theories on this image. Which of his do you think is most plausible?