In today's video ill be playing in World of Tanks Blitz and comparing two incredibly strong heavy tanks the super conqueror and the Chieftain mk.6 My Discord / discord Support my content / droodlesblitz
I have love and hate relationship with super chonk. I love the tank because It's armor and hulldown capability. In the other side, I hate this tank because I can't pen super chonk hulldown and I doesn't have it 😢
what good about the super conque is the spaced armor, it can bounce heat and hesh shell, which is good Also chieftain has less armor than S.conqueror, the chieftain has too much weak spot, the turret also can be penned when doing a hulldown, but the mobility is more good than S,conqueror
super conq's copula is easy to pen with standard pen at that, lol, chieftain you have to load premium to hit the turret. BTW, long time no upload now @Tobi Kun, zup?
@@flav5361 what i mean is, chieftain's turret is penable with HEAT & cupola is kind of tricky to hit, but the S.Conq's cupola is penable with any standard ammo, even hulldown the S.Conq is penable just under its gun, or at least based on my experiences...
I only have the chieftain and kinda want the super conq as well, when was the last time they sold super conq at the market? And was it crate or direct purchase?
‘The Chieftain mk 6 is a lightly armoured heavy tank’ Unlike in real life where it had awesome armour, and was in fact the best armoured mbt in the world when first introduced into service. Up yours Wargaming
@@adamantium2311 The engine was a dog. But Wargaming have sold the Chieftain seriously short. In real life it was an extremely formidable mtb for it’s time, far more heavily armoured than in blitz
@@adamantium2311 i guess never was introduced as standard or never seen a battle,but never saw production is kinda of false, iirc around 2 IS-7's were built,which had an armour profile much better than that of the Maus,because of the pike nose and rounded turret
Man I still can't decide which one I want to get! I'm at the conqueror right now and I'm loving it! My tier x gun is the same exact one as the s conqueror so I know what it's like for damage when I get one of the tier x tanks. But I LOVE the looks of the s con, and the chieftain aswell! And I was breaking it down (or tried to break down the numbers) it terms of turret armor, I love the s con more because it also has that extra 20mm plates on the front of the turret, and has the 20 mm plates on the top of the hull, which can easily be a game changer. I notice that the chieftain has thick armor (if not thicker) then the s con. But the chieftain doesn't seem like a hulldown up front kind of tank, unlike the s con. I feel like the chieftain shines best when you use it as almost a marksman/sniper tank. But since when I play upfront/ assault, I feel like the s con could be better? I'm not sure, what are the experts thinking? Oh, I also know the chieftain has better pen on its gun, then the s con or the other heavy.
I heard the super conq was easy pen at the turret when it was released so what happened? Did they buff the turret armor? I went inactive by the time this was released so i know less
Aesthetically, sconq only looks very sexy on its legendary camo, but almost all camo (except june bp camo which made me want to gouge my eyes) looks good on Chieftain mk6. I use motley trap on summer, leafy flecks on desert, and its legendary royal camo on winter maps
I feel like in the terms of the heavy tanks role, the mark 6 is more defensive as the SQ is more offensive. I know the DPM might say otherwise but in terms of how they can frontline the SQ is more suitable
Isnt it supposed to be other way around. Mk6 relies on its mobility and high dpm. While sconq has better turret to make itself more comfy in hulldown. Also you are not going to compete with and medium tank with that mobility unlike mk6
It's all very subjective. You can argue it's offensive and vice versa. My reasons I consider it offensive is. Less gun bloom, APCR instead of HEAT, HESH instead of HE, can facehug, brawl and frontline. Of course it can be defensive too, no doubt. But I wouldn't just simply slap a role on it because of "armor" As the RU-vidr said himself, the SQ is great at aggressive (offense) while the mark 6 cannot be as aggro.
Droodles i have a good idea for you, you should track the times that the most blitz vids are sent out and time your vids to be sent out when no one elses is
Can you make a video on the IS-6 as it is in an offer in the store right now. Also, Fun fact: IS-6's high penetration gun has better shell velocity than the Chieftain Mk. 6
not really necessary, anyone will tell you its a mediocre tank. of course, every vehicle can be good if it fits your playstyle just right or if played by a top 10 player but the is6 is just not worth it sadly. the gun isnt the greatest at its tier and the armor lacks insanely after slowly being powercrept, anyone can go through the turret and upper plate with premium, and its decent shell velocity doesnt really make up for that xD
In the future can we expect to come out Super Conqueror directly in the shop for gold? How much time passed since they introduced this vehicle and selling in the crates? We have seen T22 Medium for gold so, one day this tank also has to come for gold. It is not that OP
I like Chieftain Mk. 6 more, I think medium playstyle is better than heavy playstyle. If you always move forward, back and right, left; Mk. 6 gets a lot of bounces. Note: Chieftain's gold shell's penetration is lower than SC's but the average dmg of it is 360, not 340.
This is just King Kong Vs Godzilla I own the mk6 and it’s fun. But I’ve heard too much about them and their similarities and ppl always like to compare them
Bought the crates bundle for 34.99 got the super conq, keiler object 286/4 (already had it so 3 mill credits) and a chinese medium idk has a bunch of shit on the turret
Droodles What are your thoughts on a new tech tree. What nation should it be. Because I was thinking South Africa 🇿🇦 or Some other nation should be added too the game.
@@danielloader9625 which tech tree would it be on? There's no countries close to south Africa that already have a tech tree. Wg is gonna have to add a new tech tree to add south African tanks.
It depends since the s conq is slower than e5 so getting into position may have you be welcomed by a barrage of pre aimed shots while chieftain has less armour and more annoying weakspots than e5 including that he-able hatch so you might get hit with a 1k shot
@@eet2169 If you’re facehugging the VK and using APCR, then maybe yes. If you’re not, then VK’s upper plate is nigh invulnerable. Objectively, VK is better than the SConq. The SConq lacks side hull armor to survive in urban combat. VK is like the Swiss knife of heavies: 10 degrees gun depression for working ridge lines, rear turret placement for quality sidescraping, and overall strong hull for any situation. The SConq hulldown is better than the VK, but once pushed out of a hulldown situation, the VK is much better. I’m not even mentioning the 289 AP penetration on the VK running calibrated shells.
I can understand why Grille 15 didn't run spall liner, I'm grinding WT4 and the thing does jack sh*t to help. In like 40 games it's helped me against about 5 shots of HE
